Search

Introduction: Specific assays of plasma rivaroxaban level are not always readily available with short turnaround time, which hamper the management of urgent clinical situations. In this study, we aimed to build a predictive formula of plasma rivaroxaban levels from international normalized ratio (INR) value and validated in real world clinical situations., Methods: Ninety-four patients who were taking rivaroxaban participated in the study. Patients were randomized into testing cohort and validation cohorts. The prediction formula was built from the testing cohort and then validated in validation cohort. The predictive performance was further validated on real-world clinical requests., Results: The root mean square error (RMSE) of the predictive formula for the testing and validation cohorts were 61.81 and 69.32 ng/mL, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for the formula to predict the threshold plasma rivaroxaban level of 75 ng/mL were 95% (95% CI: 85.4%-100%) and 87.5% (95% CI: 71.3%-100%), respectively, in real-world clinical situations., Conclusion: Plasma rivaroxaban level of threshold level of 75 ng/mL can be calculated from prediction formula by INR value with satisfactory accuracy and it can be used to guide the decision for reversal., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Data on the perioperative bleeding risk associated with elevated plasma levels of direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) are limited. This study examines perioperative red blood cell (RBC) loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor reversal., Methods: This retrospective analysis includes data from 32 patients who underwent urgent noncardiac surgery between 2018 and 2022. This study aims to analyze perioperative RBC loss in patients undergoing urgent surgery with a residual FXa inhibitor level exceeding 100 mcg/L and without preoperative FXa inhibitor antidote-based reversal or unspecific treatment with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). All patients were managed using a watch-and-wait strategy., Results: The last determination of FXa inhibitor plasma concentration prior to surgery showed a median of 245 mcg/L (IQR 144-345), with a median time interval of 3.8 h (IQR 2.4-7.2) before incision. Median RBC loss during surgery was 49 mL (IQR 0-253), 189 mL (IQR 104-217) until POD1 and 254 mL (IQR 58-265) until POD3. Only one patient required intraoperative treatment with 4-factor-PCC and none required reversal with andexanet alfa. Linear regression models found no significant influence of FXa inhibitor plasma levels on intraoperative RBC loss. Rivaroxaban was associated with higher RBC loss until postoperative Day 1 compared with apixaban. No thromboembolic events were observed., Conclusion: Despite markedly elevated plasma concentrations of residual direct FXa inhibitors, perioperative RBC loss was limited in patients undergoing urgent noncardiac surgery. The intraoperative watch-and-wait strategy with selective intraoperative FXa inhibitor reversal or treatment only when required appears to be an appropriate approach., (© 2024 The Author(s). Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB.)

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant medication that has been found to be beneficial for the management of thromboembolic events linked to the Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has resulted in more than 6 million deaths worldwide. Hence, a sensitive, selective, and green bioanalytically validated method was developed using RP-HPLC coupled with DAD for the simultaneous determination of rivaroxaban in human plasma, and two co-administered drugs, namely, paracetamol, an analgesic, and ceftriaxone, an antibiotic, that are used in the management of COVID-19. An Exsil 100 ODS C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used as the stationary phase, and acetonitrile: water: methanol at a ratio of 60:30:10 (v/v/v) was used in isocratic mode as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.7 ml/min. The method was validated over a concentration range of 0.1-10.0 µg/mL for rivaroxaban, and 1.0-15.0 µg/mL for paracetamol and ceftriaxone. The lower limits of detection (LLODs) were found to be 0.03, 0.32, and 0.32 µg/ml for rivaroxaban, paracetamol, and ceftriaxone, respectively. Moreover, the lower limits of quantitation (LLOQs) were found to be 0.1, 0.96, and 0.98 µg/ml. The developed method showed excellent accuracy and precision for the determination of the aforementioned drugs. Four metrics were used to evaluate the greenness of the developed method. The results revealed that the suggested method is green, with values of 81 and 0.6 for the analytical eco-scale and analytical greenness assessment (AGREE), respectively., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives : Rivaroxaban is a direct-acting anticoagulant used to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban is a substrate for P-glycoprotein, which is encoded by the ABCB1 gene. Rivaroxaban is also metabolized by the CYP3A5 gene. Therefore, the current study is carried out to study the effects of polymorphisms in the ABCB1 and CYP3A5 genes, which may affect the plasma levels of rivaroxaban, with subsequent clinical outcomes (bleeding events) associated with the therapy. Materials and Methods : The study was conducted on 66 naive patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban. Blood samples of rivaroxaban were taken at 3 h and after 1 month following the administration of the drug to measure plasma levels. The blood level of rivaroxaban was measured with an HPLC-UV detector. Sanger sequencing was used to find polymorphisms in the targeted genes. Coagulation parameters were measured at 3 h and after 1 month of administration of rivaroxaban. Frequencies of bleeding events were recorded throughout the one-month course of drug therapy. Results : The heterozygous and homozygous mutant genotypes of ABCB1 (rs2032582, rs1045642, rs1128503, and rs4148738) and CYP3A5 (rs776746) showed lower plasma concentrations as compared to the wild-type genotype. ABCB1 (rs2032582, rs1045642, rs1128503, and rs4148738) and CYP3A5 (rs776746) gene polymorphisms had a statistically significant impact on the plasma concentration of rivaroxaban among the heterozygous and homozygous mutant genotypes compared to the wild-type genotype. The heterozygous variant of ABCB1 and homozygous variant of CYP3A5 suffered more events of bleeding. Conclusions : It was concluded that ABCB1 (rs2032582, rs1045642, rs1128503, and rs4148738) and CYP3A5 (rs776746) gene polymorphisms had a significant impact on the plasma levels of rivaroxaban in patients treated for atrial fibrillation on day three as well as after one month of the therapy. The lowest plasma levels were observed in patients with a homozygous variant of ABCB1 (rs2032582, rs1045642, or rs4148738) along with the CYP3A5*1/*3 allele. The heterozygous variant of ABCB1 SNPs and homozygous variant of CYP3A5 SNPs suffered more events of bleeding.

Rationale: Rivaroxaban is an anticoagulant prescribed to patients who are at risk of medical conditions such as deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, and strokes caused by blood clots. The administration of this drug is monitored to adjust the dosage and evaluate patients' blood concentration. Rapid quantification of this drug in plasma could make it possible to ensure that the dose present in the blood of patients does not represent a danger for the medical intervention to be carried out., Methods: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry is usually employed to quantify rivaroxaban in blood, plasma, and serum. Here, an alternative method of analysis based on laser diode thermal desorption-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LDTD-QqQMS) was developed and comprehensively validated. This new method allows the quantification of rivaroxaban in less than 13 s from sample to sample. The extraction of rivaroxaban in human serum was done by a salting-out liquid-liquid extraction with acetonitrile and a saturated sodium chloride solution., Results: The proposed method allows the quantification of rivaroxaban in less than 13 s from sample to sample. During validation, all criteria were respected. The accuracy was <15% of the nominal value, the precision was <15%CV, and the recovery was ≥89.9%. There were no observed carryover or matrix effects. Analysis of the extracted samples established the stability of dry (24 h) and wet samples (1 week) when samples cannot be analyzed immediately, a considerable advantage in a clinical setting., Conclusions: This method improves sample throughput by more than 1200% compared to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods of analysis of rivaroxaban and decreases analysis costs by reducing solvent consumption and instrument time., (© 2024 The Author(s). Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Importance: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), comprising apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are commonly used medications to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Decisions about how to manage DOACs in patients undergoing a surgical or nonsurgical procedure are important to decrease the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism., Observations: For elective surgical or nonsurgical procedures, a standardized approach to perioperative DOAC management involves classifying the risk of procedure-related bleeding as minimal (eg, minor dental or skin procedures), low to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint replacement procedures). For patients undergoing minimal bleeding risk procedures, DOACs may be continued, or if there is concern about excessive bleeding, DOACs may be discontinued on the day of the procedure. Patients undergoing a low to moderate bleeding risk procedure should typically discontinue DOACs 1 day before the operation and restart DOACs 1 day after. Patients undergoing a high bleeding risk procedure should stop DOACs 2 days prior to the operation and restart DOACs 2 days after. With this perioperative DOAC management strategy, rates of thromboembolism (0.2%-0.4%) and major bleeding (1%-2%) are low and delays or cancellations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures are infrequent. Patients taking DOACs who need emergent (<6 hours after presentation) or urgent surgical procedures (6-24 hours after presentation) experience bleeding rates up to 23% and thromboembolism as high as 11%. Laboratory testing to measure preoperative DOAC levels may be useful to determine whether patients should receive a DOAC reversal agent (eg, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet-α) prior to an emergent or urgent procedure., Conclusions and Relevance: When patients who are taking a DOAC require an elective surgical or nonsurgical procedure, standardized management protocols can be applied that do not require testing DOAC levels or heparin bridging. When patients taking a DOAC require an emergent, urgent, or semiurgent surgical procedure, anticoagulant reversal agents may be appropriate when DOAC levels are elevated or not available.

Background: The first purpose of this study was to determine whether a measurement of the level of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was possible with heparin-calibrated chromogenic anti-factor Xa activity (AXA). The second purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the antidote treatment decision level (30 or 50 ng/mL of DOAC) can be determined by unfractionated heparin (UHF)/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)-calibrated AXA., Methods: AXA was measured by using two reagents and dedicated analyzers (Sysmex CS-5100 analyzer and STA R Max3). Four types of calibrators were used: 1) Stago DOAC (rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban)-specific calibrator, 2) Stago LMWH calibrator, 3) Sysmex UHF calibrator, and 4) Sysmex LMWH calibrator. Regression analysis was used between assays. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed, and the concordance rate was calculated., Results: The correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.75 - 0.91 for rivaroxaban and 0.81 - 0.94 for apixaban. The correlation coefficient between edoxaban-calibrated AXA and Sysmex LMWH/Sysmex UHF calibrator-calibrated AXA was low (r = 0.47). Overall correlation between DOAC-calibrated AXA and Stago LMWH-calibrated AXA was linear, at only low concentration in all three DOACs. The concordance rate (89.3 - 100%) is good for de-termining the antidote management level by UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA, compared with those of DOAC-calibrated AXA in rivaroxaban and apixaban. The concordance rate ranged from 63% to 67% between Sysmex UFH/ LMWH-calibrated AXA and edoxaban-calibrated AXA., Conclusions: The findings of our study suggest limitations in calculating accurate concentrations, when using UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA to measure DOAC. This study demonstrates that UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA may be useful in determining the presence of DOACs at the cutoff level for the antidote treatment in rivarovaban and apixaban. However, in edoxaban, UFH/LMWH-calibrated AXA could not accurately measure the presence of DOACs at the cutoff for antidote treatment.

Despite a higher safety profile compared to vitamin K antagonists, rivaroxaban therapy is still connected with multiple adverse effects, such as a high risk of bleeding. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of rivaroxaban concentrations is suggested. An alternative to plasma samples can be dried blood spots (DBS), which minimize the cost of sample storage and transport. In this study, we developed a UPLC-MS/MS method for the analysis of rivaroxaban in DBS and plasma samples. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm; 3.5 µm, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a mobile phase consisting of water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% formic acid. The analytes were detected using a positive ionization mode by multiple reaction monitoring. We validated the method according to ICH guidelines. The precision and accuracy were satisfactory. Extraction recovery was approximately 57% and 66% for DBS and plasma samples, respectively. A high correlation between rivaroxaban concentrations in plasma and DBS samples collected from patients was confirmed with Deming regression. The suitability of both sampling techniques for the rivaroxaban TDM was also verified by Bland-Altman plots based on DBS-predicted and observed plasma concentrations. In addition, we found a significant relationship between rivaroxaban concentrations and coagulation parameters, including prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR).

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reflect anticoagulation agents given to treat or prevent thrombosis, having largely replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin. DOACs are given in fixed daily doses and generally do not need monitoring. However, there may be a variety of reasons that justify measurement of plasma DOAC levels in individual patients., Methods: We report updated findings for DOAC testing in our geographic region, using recent data from the RCPAQAP, an international external quality assessment (EQA) program, currently with some 40-60 participants in each of the different DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran) modules, to assess laboratory performance in this area. Data has been assessed for the past 5 years (2019-2023 inclusive), with 20 samples each per DOAC., Results: Data shows a limited repertoire of assays in use, and mostly consistency in reported numerical values when assessing proficiency samples. Available assays mostly comprised reagents from four manufacturing suppliers. There was good consistency across what participants identified as 'DOAC detected', but some variability when participants attempted to grade DOAC levels as low vs moderate vs high. Inter-laboratory/method coefficient of variation (CVs) were generally <15% for each DOAC, when present at >100 ng/mL., Conclusion: We hope our findings, reflecting on mostly consistent reporting of DOAC levels and interpretation provides reassurance for clinicians requesting these measurements, and helps support their implementation in regions where there is a paucity of test availability., (© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Routine monitoring of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) levels is not recommended but may be useful in certain clinical situations. There is a knowledge gap regarding the clinical use of DOAC levels in Australian hospitals., Aims: To evaluate the clinical settings, indications and changes to anticoagulant management associated with DOAC levels in a tertiary hospital in Northern Tasmania, Australia., Methods: Patients with one or more DOAC levels (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban) requested between January 2017 and December 2022 were identified. Retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical settings, indications, adequacy of request information and changes to clinical management associated with the measurement of DOAC levels., Results: One hundred and twenty-nine DOAC measurements (54 rivaroxaban, 66 apixaban and nine dabigatran) were performed in 98 patients between January 2017 and December 2022. Annual requests for DOAC levels increased significantly between 2017 and 2019 and remained stable between 2020 and 2021 but declined in 2022. Overall, the most common indication for a DOAC level was renal impairment, followed by bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. Approximately 25% of requests were for acute bleeding with a reversal/haemostatic agent given in 45% of patients, while 10% were prior to urgent surgery. Measurement of DOAC levels was associated with a change in management in 50% of cases. 10% of requests did not specify anticoagulant history., Conclusion: Trends in requests for DOAC levels have changed over time. Clinician education regarding the importance of providing specific anticoagulant history is essential. Future prospective studies investigating the clinical utility of DOAC levels in different clinical settings are needed., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

The evidence of rivaroxaban's pharmacokinetics in obese compared with non-obese populations remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of rivaroxaban between obese and non-obese populations under fed state. Participants who met the study's eligibility criteria were assigned into one of two groups: obese (body mass index ≥35 kg/m 2 ) or non-obese (body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ). A single dose of rivaroxaban 20 mg was orally administered to each participant. Nine blood samples over 48 h, and multiple urine samples over 18 h were collected and analyzed for rivaroxaban concentration using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass detector. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using WinNonlin software. Thirty-six participants were recruited into the study. No significant changes were observed between obese and non-obese participants in peak plasma concentration, time to reach peak plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 48 h or to infinity, elimination rate constant, half-life, apparent volume of distribution, apparent clearance, and fraction of drug excreted unchanged in urine over 18 h. Rivaroxaban's exposure was similar between the obese and non-obese subjects, and there were no significant differences in other pharmacokinetic parameters between the two groups. These results suggest that dose adjustment for rivaroxaban is probably unwarranted in the obese population., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for rivaroxaban and establish a model-based dosing guideline tailored to Chinese patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach was employed using Phoenix NLME 7.0 software to construct the PPK model for rivaroxaban. The PK of rivaroxaban was adequately characterized through a one-compartment model. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to formulate dosing guidelines applicable to different patient subgroups. Data from 60 Chinese DVT patients yielded 217 rivaroxaban plasma concentrations for analysis. The apparent clearance (CL/F) of rivaroxaban was found to be significantly influenced by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), identified as a major covariate. Based on Monte Carlo simulations, for the acute DVT treatment, a regimen of 15 mg, 10 mg, or 5 mg twice daily was associated with the highest total probability target attainment (PTA total ) in patients with normal, mildly impaired, or moderately impaired renal function, respectively. For the continued DVT treatment, a regimen of 20 mg, 15 mg, or 5 mg once daily exhibited the maximum PTA total in patients with normal, mildly impaired, or moderately impaired renal function, respectively. The recommendation label dose achieved the PK target in those with normal renal function. However, for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment, dose adjustments below the label recommendation might be necessary. The PPK model associated CL/F with the covariate eGFR. Utilizing the PPK model, a dosage regimen table was constructed to offer tailored dosing recommendations for Chinese DVT patients., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Aims: This study attempts to identify predictors associated with bleeding and stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) in Singaporean Asians taking rivaroxaban and apixaban., Methods: A total of 134 Singaporean patients on either rivaroxaban or apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included for this study. Baseline characteristics were recorded at recruitment while bleeding and SSE events were recorded during a 1-year follow-up. Peak and trough drug plasma concentrations were collected based on the dosing interval and pharmacokinetics of the drugs and quantified using high performance liquid chromatography. Characteristics of patients with or without bleeds were compared using relevant statistical tests. Multivariable regression that included covariates with p < 0.1 from an initial univariable regression was performed to analyse predictors that resulted in higher risk of bleeding in patients., Results: Median creatinine clearance (CrCl) was significantly lower in patients on rivaroxaban who experienced bleeds as compared to patients who did not experience bleeds (61.5 vs 70.8 mL/min, p = 0.047), while concomitant simvastatin use was found to be independently associated with a sixfold increased risk of bleeding (adjusted OR = 6.14 (95% CI: 1.18-31.97), p = 0.031) for rivaroxaban after controlling for body mass index, CrCl and having experienced a previous SSE., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that concomitant use of simvastatin with rivaroxaban may be associated with bleeding events in an Asian cohort. Further studies using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling are required to investigate the drug-drug interactions between these drugs., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

It is unclear whether elderly patients established on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have greater exposure to these drugs, which could subsequently increase their risk of bleeding. We assessed DOAC exposure and factors affecting it in a real-world elderly cohort of patients. For this, 151 medically stable hospital inpatients (76 established on apixaban, 61 on rivaroxaban, 14 on dabigatran) with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 84 (78-89) years were recruited. Patients provided blood samples for measurement of peak and trough plasma DOAC concentrations. There was up to 48-fold and 13-fold variation in trough and peak plasma drug concentrations respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients on apixaban had peak plasma drug concentrations within the reported ranges compared to those on either rivaroxaban or dabigatran (82·9% vs. 44·3% vs. 64·3% respectively; P < 0·001). A third of the variability in DOAC plasma concentrations was attributed to the influences of DOAC dosage, renal function and gender. To what extent the observed increases in DOAC exposure in the older patients is the cause of their increased risk of bleeding, which could potentially be ameliorated by dosing titration, requires further investigation., (© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Abstract: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vary in bioavailability and sites of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Data on DOAC use after major GIT surgery are limited. The aim of this case series was to report the impact of surgical resection or bypass of the GIT on rivaroxaban and apixaban peak plasma concentrations. This was a case series of patients who received rivaroxaban or apixaban after GIT surgery, during the period of July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban were assessed for the expected concentrations. Of the 27 assessed patients, 18 (66.7%) received rivaroxaban, and 9 (33.3%) received apixaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, 4 of 5 patients (80%) who underwent gastrectomy, and 3 of 3 patients (100%) who underwent duodenum and proximal jejunum exclusion had peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban lower than the effective range, whereas 11 of 11 patients (100%) who underwent distal bowel or ileostomy had peak rivaroxaban plasma within the effective range. After apixaban therapy, 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) who underwent total or partial gastrectomy achieved effective peak concentrations. All the patients who underwent proximal and distal bowel resection or bypass had peak concentrations of apixaban within the effective range. In conclusion, surgical resection or bypass of the upper GIT could affect DOAC absorption and subsequently peak plasma concentrations. This effect was more observed among rivaroxaban recipients. An injectable anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist may be preferred if DOAC concentrations cannot be measured after GIT surgery., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

In this study, we evaluated the in vitro stability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in blood samples of 57 patients under different storage conditions using functional coagulation assays. We determined the analyte concentrations (1) immediately after blood collection (baseline); (2) after storage of citrated whole blood (agitated) at room temperature and citrated plasma at room temperature and at 4 °C for 4, 8, and 24 h, respectively; and (3) after storage of citrated plasma at -20 °C for 30, 60, and 90 days. According to the concept of acceptable change limits (ACL), analytes were considered stable if the mean relative analyte recovery at a given time was >78%. The mean baseline values (range) of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban were 115 ng/mL (62-217), 129 ng/mL (31-215), 156 ng/mL (49-362), and 101 ng/mL (33-283), respectively. After applying the analyte stability limit, all four DOACs were stable for 24 h at room temperature and at 4 °C. The mean recovery after 24 h was 102-111% for dabigatran, 88-97% for rivaroxaban, 95-98% for apixaban, and 90-96% for edoxaban. When plasma samples were stored at -20 °C, the mean percentage deviation after 90 days for all four DOACs was ≤10%, even after three freeze-thaw cycles. Thus, for the correct determination of DOAC plasma concentrations, blood samples do not have to be analyzed immediately and can be stored at room temperature for up to 24 h before analysis. In clinical practice, blood sample transport and storage for DOAC measurements appear to be unproblematic.

Rivaroxaban is an anticoagulant (orally active direct Xa inhibitor) considered to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism and treat deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other cardiovascular complications. Bioanalytical methods for rivaroxaban quantification in plasma are necessary for application in pharmacokinetic studies, as well as in drug therapeutic monitoring. In this work, we developed and validated a sensitive bioanalytical method using LC-MS/MS for rivaroxaban quantification in human plasma using an one-step liquid-liquid extraction. The linear concentration range was 1-600 ng/mL. The bioanalytical method was also applied to pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. The results demonstrated that the method is rapid, sensitive, and adequate for application in pharmacokinetic studies., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Introduction: ST Genesia is a new automated system enabling quantitative standardized evaluation of thrombin generation (TG), for example, in patients receiving anti-Xa direct inhibitors (xabans). Data on its analytical performances are scarce., Methods: Over an 18-month period, repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy were assessed using STG-ThromboScreen (without or with thrombomodulin) or STG-DrugScreen reagents (corresponding to intermediate/high tissue-factor concentration, respectively), and controls. Furthermore, reproducibility was assessed using commercialized lyophilized and frozen normal pooled plasmas. Rivaroxaban and apixaban impacts on TG parameters were assessed using spiking experiments. Finally, a comparison with the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram method (CAT) (PPP reagent) was performed using plasma from healthy volunteers enrolled in the DRIVING-studyNCT01627665) before and after rivaroxaban intake., Results: For all dedicated quality control (QC) levels, inter-series coefficients of variations (CV) were <7% for temporal TG parameters, peak height (PH), and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), whether results were normalized with a dedicated reference plasma STG-RefPlasma or not. Noteworthy, STG-RefPlasma used for normalization displayed substantially high PH and ETP. Mean biases between the observed and manufacturer's assigned QC values were mostly <7%. Both rivaroxaban/apixaban plasma concentrations were significantly associated with TG parameters. Finally, Bland-Altman plots showed a good agreement between ST Genesia-STG-ThromboScreen and CAT method within the explored range of values, although biases could be observed (PH: 16.4 ± 13.2%, ETP: 17.8 ± 11.9%)., Conclusion: ST Genesia ® enables the reliable measurement of TG parameters in both in vitro and ex vivo xaban plasma samples using either STG-ThromboScreen or STG-DrugScreen according to xaban concentrations. The use of reference plasma, despite not completely reflecting a normal pooled plasma behavior, likely improves standardization and inter-laboratory comparisons., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Abstract: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be at higher risk of bleeding because of higher anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels. However, there is no postmarketing study investigating these DOAC plasma levels at the time of bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate DOAC levels at the time of a bleeding emergency. We analyzed 5440 patients examined at our Emergency Department in from April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019. During this period, we prospective identified 105 consecutive patients with bleeding while on long-term antithrombotic therapy; 49 patients had AF on DOACs. We compared DOAC levels in patients who bled against a control sample of 55 patients who tolerated long-term high dose DOAC therapy without any emergency. Samples of these patients were tested with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). Dabigatran-treated patients who bled had significantly higher anti-IIa levels when compared with trough (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and peak samples of controls (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Similarly, there were significantly higher anti-Xa levels in rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients with bleeding compared with trough control samples (rivaroxaban: 245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 52.5 ± 36.4 ng/mL, P <0.001 and apixaban: 311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001), as well as in apixaban-treated patients when compared with peak control samples (311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Finally, rivaroxaban anti-Xa levels in patients who bled tended to be higher compared with peak control samples (245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, P = 0.13). This observational study showed a significant difference in anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in patients with AF with bleeding complications compared with those who tolerated long-term high-dose DOAC therapy without bleeding complications., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite their usefulness in perioperative and acute care settings, factor-Xa inhibitor-specific assays are scarcely available, contrary to heparin anti-Xa assay. We assessed whether the heparin anti-Xa assay can (1) be used as a screening test to rule out apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid levels that contraindicate invasive procedures according to current guidelines (>30 ng·mL-1, >30 ng·mL-1, >0.1 µg·mL-1, and >0.1 IU·mL-1, respectively), (2) quantify the anticoagulant level if found significant, that is, if it exceeded the abovementioned threshold., Methods: In the derivation cohort then in the validation cohort, via receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, we evaluated the ability of heparin anti-Xa assay to detect levels of factor-Xa inhibitors above or below the abovementioned safety thresholds recommended for an invasive procedure (screening test). Among samples with relevant levels of factor-Xa inhibitor, we determined the conversion factor linking the measured level and heparin anti-Xa activity in a derivation cohort. In a validation cohort, the estimated level of each factor-Xa inhibitor was thus inferred from heparin anti-Xa activity. The agreement between measured and estimated levels of factor-Xa inhibitors was assessed., Results: Among 989 (355 patients) and 756 blood samples (420 patients) in the derivation and validation cohort, there was a strong linear relationship between heparin anti-Xa activities and factor-Xa inhibitors measured level (r = 0.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.99-0.99]). In the derivation cohort, heparin anti-Xa activity ≤0.2, ≤0.3, <0.1, <0.1 IU·mL-1 reliably ruled out a relevant level of apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid, respectively (area under the ROC curve ≥0.99). In the validation cohort, these cutoffs yielded excellent classification accuracy (≥96%). If this screening test indicated relevant level of factor-Xa inhibitor, estimated and measured levels closely agreed (Lin's correlation coefficient close to its maximal value: 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). More than 96% of the estimated levels fell into the predefined range of acceptability (ie, 80%-120% of the measured level)., Conclusions: A unique simple test already widely used to assay heparin was also useful for quantifying these 4 other anticoagulants. Both clinical and economic impacts of these findings should be assessed in a specific study., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Rivaroxaban is excreted from the body via multiple pathways involving glomerular filtration, drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms in P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 and CYP2J2 on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban. Eighty-six patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing AF catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. In these analyses, the dose-adjusted plasma trough concentration ratio (C 0h /D) of rivaroxaban was used as the pharmacokinetic index. The median (quartile range) rivaroxaban C 0h /D was 3.39 (2.08-5.21) ng/mL/mg (coefficient of variation: 80.5%). The C 0h /D did not differ significantly among ABCB1 c.3435C>T, c.2677G>A/T, c.1236C>T, ABCG2 c.421C>A, CYP3A5*3 and CYP2J2*7 genotypes. Stepwise selection multiple linear regression analysis showed that the estimated glomerular filtration rate was the only independent factor influencing the C 0h /D of rivaroxaban (R 2  = 0.152, P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the C 0h of rivaroxaban and prothrombin time (PT) (rho = 0.357, P = 0.001). In patients with NVAF, pharmacokinetic genotype tests are unlikely to be useful for prediction of the C 0h of rivaroxaban., (© 2020 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).)

Context: Rivaroxaban and ticagrelor are two common drugs for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome. However, the drug-drug interaction between them is still unknown., Objective: To investigate the effects of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in rats both in vivo and in vitro ., Materials and Methods: A sensitive and reliable UPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the determination of rivaroxaban in rat plasma. Ten Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into ticagrelor pre-treated group (10 mg/kg/day for 14 days) and control group. The pharmacokinetics of orally administered rivaroxaban (10 mg/kg, single dose) with or without ticagrelor pre-treatment was investigated with developed UPLC-MS/MS method. Additionally, Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes were also used to investigate the drug-drug interaction between these two drugs in vitro ., Results: The C max (221.34 ± 53.33 vs. 691.18 ± 238.31 ng/mL) and the AUC (0-t) (1060.97 ± 291.21 vs. 3483.03 ± 753.83 μg·h/L) of rivaroxaban increased significantly ( p  < 0.05) with ticagrelor pre-treatment. The MRT (0-∞) of rivaroxaban increased from 4.41 ± 0.79 to 5.97 ± 1.11 h, while the intrinsic clearance decreased from 9.93 ± 2.55 to 2.89 ± 0.63 L/h/kg (both p  < 0.05) after pre-treated with ticagrelor. Enzyme kinetic study indicated that ticagrelor decreased rivaroxaban metabolic clearance with the IC 50 value of 14.04 μmol/L., Conclusions: Our in vivo and in vitro results demonstrated that there is a drug-drug interaction between ticagrelor and rivaroxaban in rats. Further studies need to be carried out to verify whether similar interactions truly apply in humans and whether these interactions have clinical significance.

Approximately 1-2% of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation have an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) while on direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment every year. However, current evidence on stroke subtypes, pathophysiology and factors leading to the failure of DOAC preventive therapy in a "real world" setting is still scanty. This study aimed at investigating whether there is any relationship between DOAC plasma levels and the stroke occurrence, on the basis of the phenotypic classification and pathophysiology of the stroke, in a cohort of DOAC-treated patients admitted to our hospital for AIS over 1-year period. A total of 28 patients had DOAC plasma levels determined in emergency and were included in the study, nine patients receiving dabigatran, 11 rivaroxaban and 8 apixaban. The DOAC levels were low in 8/28 patients (28.6% of the sample), intermediate in 4 (14.3%) and high in 16 (57.1%). The most prevalent stroke subtype was the small vessel disease, according to the A-S-C-O phenotypic classification, in 53.6% of our sample. The most common clinical presentation was "minor stroke" in 71.4% of the cases. There was a significantly higher proportion of patients with high DOAC levels in the small vessel group, compared to the cardioembolic group without other phenotypes. The question arises as to the most suitable clinical management of AIS in these patients on DOACs. In the current absence of clear evidence, taking into account the DOAC levels (low/intermediate/high) and the underlying stroke pathophysiology, we present a flowchart of our proposed clinical management of ischemic stroke in patients while on DOAC.

The attractiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists, in addition to a better benefit-risk ratio, stems from the fact that no therapeutic drug monitoring is deemed necessary. This has been recently mitigated by the fact that increased dabigatran (D) plasma levels have been associated with hemorrhages, and is currently under scrutiny of the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate, in real conditions of use, whether patients with out-of-range DOAC blood concentrations (too high or too low) were associated with bleeding or thrombosis. Patients treated with D or rivaroxaban (R) were prospectively included in a hospital cohort. D and R plasma levels were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-at the physician's demand. We defined concentration range as "expected" within the 95% confidence interval of the mean concentration obtained from pivotal trials, and "out of range" when concentrations were outside of that interval. A blind assessment of concentrations versus occurrence of bleeding or thrombosis was performed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5 years ± 13.1), treated with D or R were included consecutively. They had a mean CHA2DS2-VASc at 4.4 ± 1.7 and a mean HAS-BLED score at 1.7 ± 0.9. Irrespective of the DOAC prescribed, patients presenting with out-of-range concentrations had significantly more bleeding or thrombosis than patients with expected concentrations (P < 0.001). Patients with bleeding were more prone to have concentrations beyond the 95 percentile (N = 62, P < 0.001), whereas patients with thrombosis were more likely to have concentrations below the fifth percentile (N = 26, P < 0.05). The main risks associated with hemorrhages were abnormal concentrations, a high HAS-BLED score, the patient's age, and the creatinine blood level. For thrombosis, a concentration below the fifth percentile was the only risk factor that was significant in our cohort. While D and R under current recommendation have a better benefit-risk ratio than warfarin, their safe usage could be further optimized by some degree of therapeutic monitoring.

Objectives For revealing the peculiarities of the drug-drug interaction of rivaroxaban (substrate CYP3A4 and P-gp) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (verapamil - inhibitor CYP3A4 and P-gp and amlodipine - substrate CYP3A4) in patients 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NAF) we studied 128 patients. Methods All patients were divided into groups depending on the therapy taken: the 1st - rivaroxaban + amlodipine (n=51), the 2nd - rivaroxaban + verapamil (n=30), the control group - rivaroxaban without CCBs (n=47). A trough steady-state plasma concentration (C min,ss) of rivaroxaban, prothrombin time (PT) in the blood plasma and the event of clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding were assessed for each patient. Results Patient in group 2 had higher C min,ss of rivaroxaban, PT and CRNM than subjects in the control group (Me 73.8 [50.6-108.8] ng/mL vs. 40.5 [25.6-74.3] ng/mL; Me 14.8 [13.4-17.3] s vs. 13.8 [12.6-14.4] s; 34% vs. 13%, respectively, p<0.05 for all). When compared, the PT and complication rate in group 1 with the control group C min,ss of rivaroxaban were practically the same (p>0.05 for all). Conclusions In patients ≥80 years with NAF, the use of rivaroxaban in combination with verapamil may not be safe and can lead to CRNM bleeding.

Objective: Although rivaroxaban has recently become widely used for thrombosis treatment, it is difficult for clinicians to make clinical decisions in critical situations, such as emergent surgery or interventions, because a specific anti-Xa assay is not available in many laboratories. This study assessed the relationships between rivaroxaban-specific anti-factor Xa activity (AXA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH)-specific AXA and determined the cutoff level for UFH-specific AXA in critical situations for patients undergoing rivaroxaban therapy., Methods: Thirty-eight blood samples were collected from patients with cancer-associated thrombosis receiving rivaroxaban therapy. All samples were assessed using both rivaroxaban-specific and UFH-specific anti-Xa assays. Routine coagulation studies, including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time, were also conducted on the samples., Results: A positive dose-dependent correlation between rivaroxaban-specific and UFH-specific AXA was evident (R = 0.97; P < .0001). Rivaroxaban-specific AXA was also positively correlated with PT (R = 0.95; P < .0001) but only weakly with activated partial thromboplastin time (R = 0.67; P < .0001). Patients with plasma rivaroxaban concentrations <100 ng/mL were found to have UFH-specific AXA <1.41 IU/mL and PT <17.3 seconds, with sensitivities of 100% and 93.3% and specificities of 87.0% and 95.7%, respectively., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that UFH-calibrated AXA correlates strongly with plasma rivaroxaban concentration. This assay appears to be sensitive to the presence of rivaroxaban, which may be advantageous in the setting of assessing drug levels for critical events. These findings suggest that if a rivaroxaban-specific anti-Xa assay is unavailable, the chromogenic anti-Xa assay for UFH may be useful to assess the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The "on-therapy range" of direct oral anticoagulants is the 90% interval of drug concentration. Previously, we reported the on-therapy range of rivaroxaban in a single-center cohort. The present study aimed to confirm the range and intraindividual reproducibility in a multicenter cohort.Eligible patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation under rivaroxaban treatment for prevention of ischemic stroke were enrolled from nine institutes in Tokyo, Japan, between June 2016 and May 2017 (n = 324). The first and second (three months later) blood samples both taken within 1-5 hours after rivaroxaban intake were analyzed (n = 219). Plasma concentration of rivaroxaban (PC-Riv) and prothrombin time (PT) with five reagents were measured.The 90% interval of PC-Riv was 47.3-532.9 ng/mL. The 90% interval of PT measured with RecombiPlasTin 2G was 11.8-22.3 seconds, the widest range among the five reagents examined. PC-Riv reproducibility within a 90% interval was evaluated bidirectionally (first-to-second and second-to-first), and 92.4% of samples were reproducible. The change rate (CR) of PC-Riv between two samplings ranged widely, and high CR (≥54.3%, cutoff for predicting non-reproducibility) was predicted by concomitant drugs (non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist and thiazide) and mitral regurgitation.We reported the on-therapy range of rivaroxaban in a multicenter cohort. This range was consistent with that of a single-center cohort and was highly reproducible within three months in daily clinical practice. However, caution is necessary regarding several factors that may affect the intraindividual variation of PC-Riv.

Background Investigation of hemostasis is problematic when patients are on anticoagulant therapy. Rivaroxaban especially causes substantial interference, extending many clot-based tests, thereby leading to false positive or negative events. In particular, rivaroxaban affects some assays for activated protein C resistance (APCR). Methods We assessed, in an international setting, cross laboratory (n = 31) testing using four samples to evaluate rivaroxaban induced interference in APCR testing, and whether this interference could be neutralised. The samples comprised: (A) pool of normal plasma (APCR-negative control); (B) this normal pool spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (potential 'false' positive APCR event sample); (C) the rivaroxaban sample subsequently treated with a commercial direct oral anticoagulant 'DOAC-neutraliser' (DOAC Stop), or (D) treated with andexanet alfa (200 μg/mL). Testing was performed blind to sample type. Results The rivaroxaban-spiked sample generated false positive APCR results for some, but unexpectedly not most APCR-tests. The sample treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in the rivaroxaban-affected APCR assays, and did not otherwise adversely affect the rivaroxaban 'unaffected' APCR assays. The andexanet alfa-treated sample did not evidence correction of the false positive APCR, and instead unexpectedly exacerbated false positive APCR status with many tests. Conclusions DOAC Stop was able to neutralise any APCR interference induced by rivaroxaban. In contrast, andexanet alfa did not negate such interference, and instead unexpectedly created more false-positive APCR events.

No data are available on rivaroxaban use in renal transplant recipients and on its surmised interaction with immunosuppressants. The aim was to investigate potential interactions between rivaroxaban and immunosuppressants in this setting. Renal transplant recipients with a stable renal function treated with rivaroxaban and tacrolimus with or without everolimus were investigated. All drugs and creatinine concentrations were determined daily for 2 weeks after the start of anticoagulation. Blood samples were drawn at 8.00 am and 3-4 h later for trough and peak concentrations, respectively. Bleeding and thrombotic events were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 6 months. In 8 renal transplant patients, rivaroxaban levels showed a predictable pharmacokinetic trend, both at C trough (30-61 μg/L) and at C peak (143-449 μg/L), with limited variability in the 25th-75th percentile range. Tacrolimus (C trough 3-13 μg/L; C peak 3-16 μg/L), everolimus (C trough 3-11 μg/L; C peak 5-17 μg/L) and creatinine concentrations were stable as well. Immunosuppressors variability before and after rivaroxaban were 30% and 30% for tacrolimus, 27% and 29% for everolimus, respectively, as well as 14% and 3% for creatinine. For rivaroxaban monitoring, the reference change value better performed in identifying significant variations of its concentration. No patient had bleeding or thrombotic events, worsening of renal graft function, and signs of immunosuppressants toxicity during a mean follow-up of 23 (9-28) months. In conclusion, rivaroxaban does not seem to interact with tacrolimus and everolimus in renal transplant recipients. Both anticoagulant and immunosuppressive effects seem warranted, without major bleeding complications and effect on the graft function., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors reports a substantial direct or indirect commercial or financial incentive associated with publication of this article., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics may affect the rivaroxaban benefit-risk balance. This study aimed to quantify associations between model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), using data from the phase 3 ROCKET AF trial (NCT00403767). In ROCKET AF, 14,264 patients with NVAF were randomized to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily [OD], or 15 mg OD if creatinine clearance was 30-49 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (median follow-up: 707 days); rivaroxaban plasma concentration was measured in a subset of 161 patients. In this post hoc exposure-response analysis, a multivariate Cox model was used to correlate individual predicted rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with time-to-event efficacy and safety outcomes in 7061 and 7111 patients, respectively. There was no significant association between model-predicted rivaroxaban trough plasma concentration (C trough ) and efficacy outcomes. Creatinine clearance and history of stroke were significantly associated with efficacy outcomes. C trough was significantly associated with the composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding (hazard ratio [95th percentile vs. median]: 1.26 [95% confidence interval 1.13-1.40]) but not with major bleeding alone. The exposure-response relationship for major or NMCR bleeding was shallow with no clear threshold for an acceleration in risk. History of gastrointestinal bleeding had a greater influence on safety outcomes than C trough . These results support fixed rivaroxaban 15 mg and 20 mg OD dosages in NVAF. Therapeutic drug monitoring is unlikely to offer clinical benefits in this indication beyond evaluation of patient characteristics.

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit-risk balance of therapy. The study objective was to assess the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (VTE-P) after hip/knee replacement surgery. Post hoc exposure-response analyses were conducted using data from the phase 3 RECORD1-4 studies, in which 12,729 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or enoxaparin for ≤ 39 days. Multivariate regression approaches were used to correlate model-predicted individual rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with outcomes. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and by making use of the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentration and dynamics of PT. No significant associations between rivaroxaban exposure and total VTE or major bleeding were identified. A significant association between exposure and a composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding from day 4 after surgery was observed. The relationship was shallow, with an approximate predicted absolute increase in a composite of major or NMCR bleeding from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.54] to 2.18% (95% CI 1.51-3.17) at the 5th and 95th percentiles of trough plasma concentration, respectively. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit-risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Hence, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-P.

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit-risk balance of therapy. This study assessed the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism treatment (VTE-T) using data from the phase 3 EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE studies. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and PT dynamics. The composite efficacy outcomes evaluated were recurrent deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and recurrent DVT, PE and all-cause death; safety outcomes were major bleeding and the composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding. Exposure-response relationships were evaluated using multivariate logistic and Cox regression for the twice-daily (BID) and once-daily (OD) dosing periods, respectively. Predicted rivaroxaban exposure and CrCl were significantly associated with both efficacy outcomes in the BID period. In the OD period, exposure was significantly associated with recurrent DVT and PE but not recurrent DVT, PE and all-cause death. The statistically significant exposure-efficacy relationships were shallow. Exposure-safety relationships were absent within the investigated exposure range. During both dosing periods, low baseline hemoglobin and prior bleeding were associated with the composite of major or NMCR bleeding. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit-risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Therefore, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-T.

Purpose: There is little evidence to guide the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with class III obesity. Clinicians face the dilemma that using DOACs in patients with class III obesity may not provide adequate anticoagulation, while avoiding DOACs may deprive them of a useful therapeutic option. We present 2 cases describing our experience navigating rivaroxaban use in patients with class III obesity and review available case reports of measurement of rivaroxaban levels using a calibrated anti-factor Xa assay., Summary: In patient case 1, the rivaroxaban trough level was within the reference range, and therapy was continued. In patient case 2, the rivaroxaban trough level was below the reference range, and the patient's anticoagulation therapy was switched to warfarin. No thromboembolic events were noted in the 2 patients more than 1 year (15 and 22 months, respectively) after initiation of anticoagulation therapy. Because of the many advantages associated with use of DOACs instead of vitamin K antagonists, further research is critical to enabling clinicians to use DOACs more confidently in a broader population., Conclusion: When monitoring rivaroxaban therapy in patients with class III obesity, there is uncertainty regarding clinical interpretation of drug levels that fall outside of established reference ranges, and monitoring is not standardized or widely available. In addition to case reports found in the literature, the presented cases highlight these challenges and differing clinical decisions made when evaluating rivaroxaban levels in patients with class III obesity., (© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Acute myocardial infarction is a leading cause of death worldwide. Though highly beneficial, reperfusion of myocardium is associated with reperfusion injury. While indirect inhibition of Factor Xa has been shown to attenuate myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Our study sought to evaluate the effect of rivaroxaban (RIV), a direct inhibitor of Factor Xa, on myocardial I/R injury and determine its cellular targets., Experimental Approach: We used a rat model of 40-min coronary ligation followed by reperfusion. RIV (3 mg/kg) was given per os 1 h before reperfusion. Infarct size and myocardial proteic expression of survival pathways were assessed at 120 and 30 min of reperfusion, respectively. Plasmatic levels of P-selectin and von Willebrand factor were measured at 60 min of reperfusion. Cellular RIV effects were assessed using hypoxia-reoxygenation (H/R) models on human umbilical vein endothelial cells and on rat cardiomyoblasts (H9c2 cell line)., Key Results: RIV decreased infarct size by 21% (42.9% vs. 54.2% in RIV-treated rats and controls respectively, P < 0.05) at blood concentrations similar to human therapeutic (387.7 ± 152.3 ng/mL) levels. RIV had no effect on H/R-induced modulation of endothelial phenotype, nor did it alter myocardial activation of reperfusion injury salvage kinase and survivor activating factor enhancement pathways at 30 min after reperfusion. However, RIV exerted a cytoprotective effect on H9c2 cells submitted to H/R., Conclusions: RIV decreased myocardial I/R injury in rats at concentrations similar to human therapeutic ones. This protection was not associated with endothelial phenotype modulation but rather with potential direct cytoprotection on cardiomyocytes.

Background: Pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring of anticoagulants require a simple, rapid, and reliable analytical method for monitoring plasma concentrations. The aims of the current work were to develop and validate a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of 3 direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) in human plasma that is suitable for pharmacokinetic studies and routine therapeutic drug monitoring in busy hospital laboratories., Methods: This method included a hydrolysis step to account for the active acylglucuronide metabolites of dabigatran that demonstrate an equivalent anticoagulant effect as dabigatran. After hydrolysis, a simple one-step protein precipitation was used for sample preparation. Total dabigatran (the sum of free dabigatran and the contribution from dabigatran acylglucuronides), rivaroxaban, and apixaban, and their corresponding isotopically labeled internal standards were resolved on a C18(2) column. All compounds were detected using electrospray ionization liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in the positive mode., Results: For all 3 anticoagulants, standard curves were linear over the concentration range of 1.0-1000 mcg/L (r > 0.99), bias was < ±10%, and intraday and interday coefficients of variation (imprecision) were <10%. The limit of quantification was 1.0 mcg/L. For all 3 anticoagulants and corresponding isotopically labeled internal standards, the absolute recoveries were similar and consistent, with mean values of 93%-102%. No significant matrix effects were observed., Conclusions: This method is simple, rapid, robust, and reliable and can be used to analyze the plasma concentrations of the drugs in patients on dabigatran or rivaroxaban therapy.

Background: Rivaroxaban, a novel oral anticoagulant drug, is widely used in clinical practice. There is no standardized laboratory monitoring for rivaroxaban, and its plasma concentration in Chinese patients with deep vein thrombosis is unclear. The rivaroxaban concentrations in human plasma and determine the steady-state concentration of rivaroxaban in patients with deep vein thrombosis are needed., Methods: An ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection method was developed. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters BEH C18 column with isocratic elution using a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile and water. Quantitation of the analytes was performed using positive ionization mode and mass transitions of m/z 437.3 → m/z 145.0 and m/z 440.1 → m/z 145.0 for rivaroxaban and the internal standard, respectively. Blood samples were collected at 0 h and 2 h after patients took rivaroxaban for 7 days or more., Results: The method was validated over the concentration range of 0.5 ~ 400 ng•mL - 1 with a very low limit of quantification of 0.5 ng·mL - 1 , and the intra- and inter-day precision (RSD%) were < 15%. The range of the steady state concentration in patients that took 15 mg rivaroxaban twice daily, 10 mg twice daily, 20 mg once daily, 15 mg once daily, and 10 mg once daily were 168.5 ~ 280.1 ng•mL - 1 , 74.2 ~ 271.4 ng•mL - 1 , 25.7 ~ 306.8 ng•mL - 1 , 24.5 ~ 306.4 ng•mL - 1 , and 15.4 ~ 229.2 ng•mL - 1 , respectively., Conclusions: The plasma rivaroxaban concentration in patients who took 10 mg rivaroxaban twice daily fluctuated less than that in patients who took 20 mg rivaroxaban once daily. The plasma concentration can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring for rivaroxaban.

Clinical studies are needed to clarify the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in breastfeeding women. To support emerging clinical studies on investigating DOAC's transfer into breast milk, an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for quantifying three DOACs - apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban in human plasma and breast milk. Protein precipitation with methanol was performed for sample preparation. Chromatographic analysis was performed using a C18 column. The MS detection was performed in MRM mode. The method was validated in accordance with the European Guideline (EMA). The calibration range was 5-500 ng/mL in plasma and 5-250 ng/mL in breast milk. The within-batch and between-batch variability remained <9%. Recoveries ranged from 106.13% to 109.05% in plasma and from 93.40% to 107.91% in breast milk. The lot-to-lot matrix variability was within ±15% among a range of samples originating from many different subjects. All analytes were stable when stored for 24 h at room temperature, 7 days at 2-8 °C, and at least 5 weeks at -20 °C in both plasma and breast milk. The developed method fulfilled the EMA bioanalytical method validation guideline and was shown to be simple, fast, accurate and will now be used in a clinical trial evaluating the transfer of apixaban and rivaroxaban into human breast milk., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Declaration of Competing Interest The authors state that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

A high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric method for the determination of Rivaroxaban in human plasma has been developed and validated using Rivaroxaban D 4 as an internal standard. The extraction of analyte and internal standard was accomplished by solid phase extraction technique. The method has been validated over a concentration range of 5.96-801 ng/mL. Chromatographic separations were achieved using Gemini C18, 150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, column eluted at flow rate of 1.5 mL/min with mobile phase (acetonitrile: ammonium acetate buffer (80:20 v/v)). The overall run time of method was about 1.8 min with elution times of Rivaroxaban and its internal standard Rivaroxaban D 4 at around 1.18 min. The multiple reaction monitoring transitions were set at 436/145 (m/z) and 440/145 (m/z) for Rivaroxaban and Rivaroxaban D 4 , respectively. The calibration curves were linear (r 2  ≥ 0.99) over the range of 5.96-801 ng/mL with lower limit of quantitation validated at 5.96 ng/mL. Extraction recoveries were >88% for both rivaroxaban and its stable labeled internal standard rivaroxaban D 4 . The inter-day/between run precisions were ranged from 1.08% to 3.75%, while accuracy ranged from 96.3% to 102%. The presented method was used in pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers. Results of incurred sample reanalysis were within the acceptance range of ±20% of original value, for 98.3% of samples reanalyzed. This indicated good assay precision of target analytes in their real matrix at the employed experimental conditions. The applicability of the assay for the determination of the pharmacokinetic parameters was demonstrated.

Background: Accurate medication reconciliation in trauma patients is essential but difficult. Currently, there is no established clinical method of detecting direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in trauma patients. We hypothesized that a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS)-based assay can be used to accurately detect DOACs in trauma patients upon hospital arrival., Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 356 patients who provided informed consent including 10 healthy controls, 19 known positive or negative controls, and 327 trauma patients older than 65 years who were evaluated at our large, urban level 1 trauma center. The assay methodology was developed in healthy and known controls to detect apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran using LCMS and then applied to 327 samples from trauma patients. Standard medication reconciliation processes in the electronic medical record documenting DOAC usage were compared with LCMS results to determine overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of the assay., Results: Of 356 patients, 39 (10.96%) were on DOACs: 21 were on apixaban, 14 on rivaroxaban, and 4 on dabigatran. The overall accuracy of the assay for detecting any DOAC was 98.60%, with a sensitivity of 94.87% and specificity of 99.05% (PPV, 92.50%; NPV, 99.37%). The assay detected apixaban with a sensitivity of 90.48% and specificity of 99.10% (PPV, 86.36%; NPV 99.40%). There were three false-positive results and two false-negative LCMS results for apixaban. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were detected with 100% sensitivity and specificity., Conclusion: This LCMS-based assay was highly accurate in detecting DOACs in trauma patients. Further studies need to confirm the clinical efficacy of this LCMS assay and its value for medication reconciliation in trauma patients., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Test, level III.

Rapidly available tests might be useful to measure the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) in emergency situations as bleedings, surgery, or before thrombolysis. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of DOAs on global thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Coagulation parameters assessed at peak and trough in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban at steady-state (patients) were compared to those of healthy volunteers (controls). Citrated blood samples were tested by ROTEM using diluted EXTEM assay, with and without the addition of an anti-FXa catcher, and using ECATEM-B, with and without the addition of an anti-FIIa catcher. Overall 30 patients (10 for each DOA) and 15 controls were included. The mean clotting time (CT) of patients at peak and trough were significantly higher compared to controls. The mean CT was significantly shortened after the addition of the anti-FXa catcher to apixaban (p = 0.005 for peak and p = 0.009 for trough) and to rivaroxaban samples (p = 0.005 for both peak and trough) and after the addition of anti-FIIa cather to dabigatran samples (p = 0.005 for both peak and trough). ROC curve analyses showed a good accuracy for CT and for CT/CT + catcher (CTc) in measuring dabigatran anticoagulant activity (AUC 1.000 and 0.993, respectively); for CT, CT/CTc and clot formation time (CFT)/CFT + catcher (CFTc) in measuring both apixaban activity (0.917, 0.880 and 0.880, respectively) and rivaroxaban activity (0.973, 0.987 and 0.860, respectively). In this study the use of ad-hoc designed reagents and catcher molecules was able to accurately identify DOAs activity at ROTEM.

Background: The anticoagulant actions of oral direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors can be inferred from their observed plasma concentrations; however, the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of different FXa inhibitors have not been compared in clinically., Methods: The sensitivity of the rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban in the STA-Liquid Anti-FXa assay were compared, and the anti-FXa plasma concentrations were measured for PK assessments. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to assess population PK in 329 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. Patients were followed up for an average of 3.6 years., Results: Sensitivity was similar among the three drugs in this assay, which could directly compare plasma concentrations instead of anti-FXa activities. Overall exposure was greatest in 5 mg BID apixaban relative to other drugs (p < 0.001). The geometric mean AUC for the 0 to 24-h interval was 4550 ng h/mL for apixaban, 2710 ng h/mL for 15 mg QD rivaroxaban, and 1290 ng h/mL for 60 mg QD edoxaban. The PKs of 2.5 mg BID apixaban or 15 mg QD rivaroxaban were associated with hemorrhagic events., Conclusions: Apixaban was associated with greater exposure, higher trough concentrations in plasma compared with rivaroxaban or edoxaban. Furthermore, a higher plasma concentration may partially predict hemorrhagic events., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest SH has received honoraria for lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., and Daiichi-Sankyo, Ltd. There are no other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2019 The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Laboratory monitoring of rivaroxaban (RIV) is required under certain conditions. Mass spectrometry and anti-factor Xa assays are the recommended methods, which may not be readily available. Prothrombin time (PT) is the most widely used and simple coagulation assay. To set the cutoff PT and international normalized ratio (INR) to estimate RIV overdose status. RIV-spiked pooled normal plasma was used. PT test was performed using a CA-7000 coagulometer and Thromborel S reagent. The precise measurement of RIV concentration at the cut-off PT was evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) EP12-A2 guideline. The RIV concentration at 275 ng/mL was analyzed using 40 replicates. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value for the determination of RIV potential overdose status. An imprecision estimation of PT was conducted with 220.00 ng/mL, 247.50 ng/mL, 261.25 ng/mL, 288.75 ng/mL, 302.50 ng/mL and 330.00 ng/mL concentrations of RIV in 60 replicates. According to the ROC analysis, the cutoff clotting times and INR values to determine the overdose status of RIV were 13.45 s and 1.39. With these values, there was a 92.6% probability that plasma samples with RIV concentration ≤ 247.50 ng/mL yielded consistently negative (on-therapy dose) results, and those with ≥ 302.50 ng/mL yield consistent positive (potential overdose) results using our PT assay. PT with a reliable cutoff clotting time and INR can be used to determine the potential overdose status of RIV to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment by controlling the dose.

Background: Concern remains over reliable point-of-care testing to guide reversal of rivaroxaban, a commonly used factor Xa inhibitor, in high-acuity settings. Thromboelastography (TEG), a point-of-care viscoelastic assay, may have the ability to detect the anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban. The authors ascertained the association of apparent rivaroxaban concentration with thromboelastography reaction time, i.e., time elapsed from blood sample placement in analyzer until beginning of clot formation, as measured using TEG and TEG6S instruments (Haemonetics Corporation, USA), hypothesizing that reaction time would correlate to degree of functional factor Xa impairment., Methods: The authors prospectively performed a diagnostic accuracy study comparing coagulation assays to apparent (i.e., indirectly assessed) rivaroxaban concentration in trauma patients with and without preinjury rivaroxaban presenting to a single center between April 2016 and July 2018. Blood samples at admission and after reversal or 24 h postadmission underwent TEG, TEG6S, thrombin generation assay, anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay, prothrombin time (PT), and ecarin chromogenic assay testing. The authors determined correlation of kaolin TEG, TEG6S, and prothrombin time to apparent rivaroxaban concentration. Receiver operating characteristic curve compared capacity to distinguish therapeutic rivaroxaban concentration (i.e., greater than or equal to 50 ng/ml) from nontherapeutic concentrations., Results: Eighty rivaroxaban patients were compared to 20 controls. Significant strong correlations existed between rivaroxaban concentration and TEG reaction time (ρ = 0.67; P < 0.001), TEG6S reaction time (ρ = 0.68; P < 0.001), and prothrombin time (ρ = 0.73; P < 0.001), however reaction time remained within the defined normal range for the assay. Rivaroxaban concentration demonstrated strong but not significant association with coagulation assays postreversal (n = 9; TEG reaction time ρ = 0.62; P = 0.101; TEG6S reaction time ρ = 0.57; P = 0.112) and small nonsignificant association for controls (TEG reaction time: ρ = -0.04; P = 0.845; TEG6S reaction time: ρ = -0.09; P = 0.667; PT-neoplastine: ρ = 0.19; P = 0.301). Rivaroxaban concentration (area under the curve, 0.91) and TEG6S reaction time (area under the curve, 0.84) best predicted therapeutic rivaroxaban concentration and exhibited similar receiver operating characteristic curves (P = 0.180)., Conclusions: Although TEG6S demonstrates significant strong correlation with rivaroxaban concentration, values within normal range limit clinical utility rendering rivaroxaban concentration the gold standard in measuring anticoagulant effect.

Aim: A sensitive and reliable LC-MS/MS method has been established and validated to the quantitation of rivaroxaban (RIV) and TAK-438 in rat plasma using carbamazepine as internal standard. Results: The procedure of method validation was conducted according to the guidelines of EMA and US FDA. At the same time, the method was applied to pharmacokinetic interactions study between RIV and TAK-438 for the first time. When RIV and TAK-438 co-administration to rats, main pharmacokinetic parameters of TAK-438 like AUC (0-t) , AUC (0-∞) and C max had statistically significant increase. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of RIV have no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) when co-administered except for t 1/2 (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The results indicated that drug-drug interactions occurred between RIV and TAK-438 when co-administered to rats.

Background: Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor with substantial inter-individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Pharmacodynamic (PD) variability, especially assessed with thrombin generation (TG), has been less documented., Objectives: (i) To assess TG parameter time profiles in healthy volunteers, with TG being studied under different conditions and (ii) to model the relationship between rivaroxaban concentrations and TG parameters and subsequently estimate interindividual variability., Methods: Sixty healthy male volunteers (DRIVING-NCT01627665) received a single 40-mg rivaroxaban dose. Blood sampling was performed at baseline and 10 predefined time points over 24 h. The TG was investigated with the fully automated ST-Genesia system (Stago), using two tissue-factor (TF) concentrations, in the absence (-), or presence (+) of thrombomodulin (TM) for the lowest one. The PD models were built to characterize the relationships between plasma rivaroxaban concentrations and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) or peak height induced by the lowest TF concentration., Results: Thrombin generation parameter time profiles with the lowest TF concentration showed a good sensitivity to rivaroxaban, especially +TM (active protein C negative feedback). The relationship between rivaroxaban concentrations and TG parameters was modeled with a sigmoidal relation. Mean rivaroxaban concentrations halving the baseline value of ETP and peak height (-TM) (C 50 ) were of 284 and 33.2 ng/mL, respectively: +TM, C 50 declined to 19.4 and 13.8 ng/mL, reflecting a powerful inhibitory effect. The estimated C 50 population coefficients of variation were of 12.2% (-TM) and 31.3% (+TM) with the peak height models, 34.8% (+TM) with the ETP model., Conclusions: This low-rivaroxaban to moderate-rivaroxaban PD variability in healthy volunteers contrasts with the substantial PK variability and deserves to be studied in different patient settings., (© 2019 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Steady-state plasma concentrations of anticoagulants and the time since the previous administration in mainly outpatients with atrial fibrillation administered standard or reduced doses were analyzed for 110 elderly Japanese subjects (mean age, 76 years) treated with apixaban (2.5 or 5.0 mg twice daily), dabigatran etexilate (110 or 150 mg twice daily), edoxaban (30 or 60 mg once daily) or rivaroxaban (10 or 15 mg once daily) at one general hospital. The pharmacokinetics in patients treated with standard and reduced doses of the four anticoagulants using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was compared with the concentration ranges estimated using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Reduced doses of anticoagulants resulted in relatively small pharmacokinetic variations compared with the standard dose. Statistical analyses revealed that renal impairment is likely not the sole determinant factor for high plasma concentrations of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. Patients with atrial fibrillation should be treated with the correct doses of oral anticoagulants as specified in the package inserts (e.g. reduced doses for elderly patients, patients with low body weights and in combination with P-glycoprotein inhibitor drugs) to avoid excessive or insufficient doses of direct oral anticoagulants.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to prove the suitability of simultaneously administered microdoses of the factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs) rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban (100 µg in total). To evaluate drug-drug interactions, the impact of ketoconazole, a known strong inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein, was studied., Methods: In a crossover clinical trial, 18 healthy volunteers were randomized to the two treatments using microdoses of rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban alone and when coadministered with ketoconazole. Plasma and urine concentrations of microdosed apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban were quantified using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 pg/ml., Results: The microdosed FXaI cocktail showed similar pharmacokinetic parameters compared with published data, using normal therapeutic doses of each FXaI. Ketoconazole significantly increased exposure, with geometric mean AUC ratios of 1.90 (apixaban), 2.35 (edoxaban) and 2.27 (rivaroxaban)., Conclusion: The microdosed FXaI cocktail approach was able to precisely predict the drug interaction with ketoconazole. This is the first study that has been conducted to evaluate drug-drug interactions with a drug class, and the low administered doses also allow evaluation in vulnerable target populations., Study Protocol: EudraCT 2016-003024-23.

Introduction: Lupus anticoagulant (LA) investigation in patients on anticoagulant therapy is problematic. Rivaroxaban in particular causes significant interference, prolonging both LA screening and confirmation tests, and falsely raising LA screen/confirm ratios, leading to potential false identification of LA. The Russell Viper Venom Time (RVVT) assay, key to the investigation of LA, is especially sensitive to rivaroxaban., Materials and Methods: We assessed cross laboratory (n = 82) testing of four samples to investigate whether rivaroxaban induced interference in LA testing could be neutralised. Testing was performed blind to sample type. The samples comprised: (A) A pool of normal plasma (LA-negative control); (B) sample A spiked with rivaroxaban (200 ng/mL) to create rivaroxaban-induced interference (LA 'false' positive sample); (C) sample B subsequently treated with a commercial 'DOAC-neutraliser' (DOAC Stop); (D) sample B treated with andexanet alfa (200 μg/mL)., Results: As expected, the rivaroxaban-spiked sample (B) caused prolongation of most LA-tests, and also generated a falsely prolonged RVVT screen/confirm ratio (median 1.37, compared to 0.97 for sample A). The sample (C) treated with DOAC Stop evidenced a correction in LA-test clotting times, as well as neutralising the false positive LA (median RVVT screen/confirm ratio of 0.99). Although the andexanet alfa treated sample (D) also yielded a low median RVVT screen/confirm ratio of 0.88, it did not fully correct LA-test clotting times. Consistent with test findings, all laboratories interpreted samples A and C as being LA-negative. For sample B (rivaroxaban), 45.3% identified this as LA positive, and 38.7% identified LA interference. Most (61.3%) also identified sample D as LA negative, with the remainder (38.7%) identifying LA interference., Conclusions: DOAC Stop was able to neutralise the false LA activity induced by rivaroxaban, both in terms of clot-times and LA ratios. In contrast, whilst andexanet alfa negated the rivaroxaban-prolonged LA-ratio, it did not fully correct clot-times, leaving some residual LA interference, and requiring additional testing to investigate prolonged clotting times., (Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)