Search

The neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor gene generates two splice variants, referred to here as Y5(L) (long isoform) and Y5(S) (short isoform). Y5(L) mRNA differs from Y5(S) mRNA in its 5' end, generating a putative open reading frame with 30 additional nucleotides upstream of the initiator AUG compared with the Y5(S) mRNA. The purpose of the present work was to investigate the existence of the Y5(L) mRNA. The authenticity of this transcript was confirmed by isolating part of its 5' untranslated region through 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends and analysing its tissue distribution. To study the initiation of translation on Y5(L) mRNA, we cloned the Y5(L) cDNA and two Y5(L) cDNA mutants lacking the first or the second putative initiation start codon. Transient expression of the three plasmids in COS-7 cells and saturation binding experiments using (125)I-labelled polypeptide YY (PYY) as a ligand showed that initiation of translation on Y5(L) mRNA could start at the first AUG, giving rise to a Y5(L) receptor with an N-terminal 10-amino-acid extension when compared with the Y5(S) receptor. The human Y5(L) and Y5(S) receptor isoforms displayed similar affinity constants (1.3 nM and 1.5 nM respectively). [(125)I]PYY binding to COS-7 cells expressing either the Y5(L) or the Y5(S) isoform was inhibited with the same rank order of potency by a selection of six chemically diverse compounds: PYY>neuropeptide Y>pancreatic polypeptide>CGP71683A>Synaptic 34>Banyu 6. Comparison of the tissue distribution of Y5(L) and Y5(S) mRNAs, as determined by reverse transcription-PCR analysis, indicated that expression of Y5(L) mRNA occurs in a tissue-specific manner. Finally, we have shown that the two AUG triplets contained in the 5' untranslated region of Y5(L) mRNA did not affect receptor expression.

We report the characterization by genomics-based approach of the human H4-receptor gene structure. The H4-receptor gene have been mapped by radiation hybrid experiments (Gene Bridge 4) on chromosome 18q11.2, between the AFMBB11WH5 and CHLC.GATA85D10 markers. The H4-receptor gene spans more than 21 kbp and contains three exons separated by two large introns (>7 kbp). RT-PCR analysis showed that the H4-receptor gene encoded a 3.7 kb mRNA which did not seem to be alternatively spliced within its coding region. The H4-receptor transcripts were found to be highly expressed in peripheral tissues implicated in inflammatory responses such as leukocytes, spleen, lung, and liver. In addition, low expression level of the H4-receptor mRNA was also detected in several human brain regions. Analysis of the 5'-flanking region of the H4-receptor gene did not reveal the existence of canonical TATA or CAAT-box. However, several putative regulatory elements mediating TNFalpha or IL-6-stimulated transcriptional activation were detected. The uteroglobin promoter binding factor, known to mediate anti-inflammatory response of uteroglobin, in the lung, was also found in this region. Thus, the description of the H4-receptor gene promoter region will facilitate the elucidation of its transcriptional control by factors secreted during inflammatory responses., (Copyright 2001 Academic Press.)

We have identified from human liver eight alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1A)-AR) splice variants that were also expressed in human heart, prostate and hippocampus. Three of these alpha(1A)-AR isoforms (alpha(1A-1)-AR, alpha(1A-2a)-AR and alpha(1A-3a)-AR) gave rise to receptors with seven transmembrane domains (7TMalpha(1A)-AR). The other five (alpha(1A-2b)-AR, alpha(1A-2c)-AR, alpha(1A-3c)-AR, alpha(1A-5)-AR and alpha(1A-6)-AR) led to truncated receptors lacking transmembrane domain VII (6TMalpha(1A)-AR). The 7TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms transiently expressed in COS-7 cells bound [(3)H]prazosin with high affinity (K(d) 0.2 nM) and mediated a noradrenaline (norepinephrine)-induced increase in cytoplasmic free Ca(2+) concentration, whereas the 6TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms were incapable of ligand binding and signal transduction. Immunocytochemical studies with N-terminal epitope-tagged alpha(1A)-AR isoforms showed that the 7TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms were present both at the cell surface and in intracellular compartments, whereas the 6TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms were exclusively localized within the cell. Interestingly, in co-transfected cells, each truncated alpha(1A)-AR isoform inhibited [(3)H]prazosin binding and cell-surface trafficking of the co-expressed 'original' 7TMalpha(1A-1)-AR. However, there was no modification of either the [(3)H]prazosin-binding affinity or the pharmacological properties of alpha(1A-1)-AR. Immunoblotting experiments revealed that co-expression of the alpha(1A-1)-AR with 6TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms did not impair alpha(1A-1)-AR expression. Therefore the expression in human tissues of many truncated isoforms constitutes a new regulation pathway of biological properties of alpha(1A)-AR.

Uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3), a member of the UCP family, mainly expressed in skeletal muscle could be responsible for thermogenesis in humans. Since little is known about its regulation, we studied the 5' flanking region of the human UCP3 (hUCP3) gene, which potentially contains the promoter sequences. We report the hUCP3 transcription initiation on a G located 764 nucleotides upstream the A contained in the first translated codon. Therefore, hUCP3 first exon has 669 bases of untranslated sequence. We also report the cloning and sequencing of seven kilobases from the gene 5' end and analyze the features of the potential proximal promoter. The MyoD family binding motif, called E-box, is the most abundant on this region. Other muscle-specific motives present in the potential proximal promoter include a MEF2 site as well as binding sequences for ubiquitous factors such as GC box and two CAAT boxes. Additionally, three putative peroxisome proliferator and one thyroid hormone response elements (PPRE and TRE, respectively) are found, which suggest a potential role for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) and thyroid hormone in human UCP3 gene expression. The description of the promoter region of the UCP3 gene will facilitate the elucidation of its transcriptional control., (Copyright 1999 Academic Press.)

Resident peritoneal macrophages exposed to inflammatory stimuli (zymosan, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)) represent a widely used model for studying arachidonic acid metabolism and for screening of prostaglandin (PG) synthesis inhibitors. In the present study, cyclooxygenase 1 (COX1) was shown constitutively expressed in mouse adherent and non-adherent macrophages whereas expression of COX2 was observed only in adherent cells, even when cultured in minimal conditions (Ca-, Mg- and serum-free medium). The COX2 expression was amplified by arachidonic acid cascade stimulating agents (Ca, Mg, zymosan) and by LPS in a time-dependant manner; PGE2 by itself amplified LPS-induced COX2 expression. In well-defined experimental conditions of COX2 expression (LPS-stimulated adherent macrophages), we studied specific interactions of some representative anti-inflammatory drugs with COX2 enzymatic activity and expression. By contrast with dexamethasone, which reduced PGE2 release together with a strong reduction of COX2 expression (protein and mRNA), non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduced PGE2 synthesis without any effect at the COX2 mRNA level. This reduction of PGE2 production by NSAIDs resulted from either an exclusive enzymatic inhibition (aspirin, NS398, 6-Methoxy naphtyl acetic acid) or an enzymatic inhibition associated with a slight decrease of COX2 protein level (indomethacin). For paracetamol and salicylic acid, two weak inhibitors of COX enzymatic activity, reduction of PGE2 synthesis appeared to be related to reduced level of COX2. These findings show that the macrophage can be used as a cellular model to study specifically COX1 and COX2. In this cell type, COX2 expression is dependent on adhesion, enhanced by stimulation of arachidonic acid metabolism, and auto amplified by PGE2. Furthermore, the results indicate that known NSAIDs differ in their interaction with cyclooxygenase, being able to inhibit either COX2 enzymatic activity, and/or COX2 expression. However, further studies are required to determine the mechanism and the role of COX2 expression during inflammation in vivo, and to define more precisely the best target for new potent and safe NSAIDs.