Search

Simple Summary: The interaction between the immune system, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is complex and multifaceted and involves all cellular elements of the tumour microenvironment, together with the molecules expressed and secreted in the inflamed milieu. In patients with both diseases, considering that COPD is thought to impair the immune response against tumour cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy appear to improve the pathological responses of NSCLC patients, showing promising improvements in survival. In the present review, we sought to understand the interaction between the two pathways and how the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC and COPD is affected in these patients. The interplay between the immune system and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is complex and multifaceted. In COPD, chronic inflammation and oxidative stress can lead to immune dysfunction that can exacerbate lung damage, further worsening the respiratory symptoms. In NSCLC, immune cells can recognise and attack the cancer cells, which, however, can evade or suppress the immune response by various mechanisms, such as expressing immune checkpoint proteins or secreting immunosuppressive cytokines, thus creating an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment that promotes cancer progression and metastasis. The interaction between COPD and NSCLC further complicates the immune response. In patients with both diseases, COPD can impair the immune response against cancer cells by reducing or suppressing the activity of immune cells, or altering their cytokine profile. Moreover, anti-cancer treatments can also affect the immune system and worsen COPD symptoms by causing lung inflammation and fibrosis. Immunotherapy itself can also cause immune-related adverse events that could worsen the respiratory symptoms in patients with COPD-compromised lungs. In the present review, we tried to understand the interplay between the two pathologies and how the efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with COPD is affected in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The sensitivity to chemotherapy of KRASG12C-mutated colorectal cancer has been investigated to verify whether the combination of chemotherapy plus a KRASG12C-inhibitor might become the standard of care in the near future. To this aim, the present retrospective study was designed to assess the performance of irinotecan vs. oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of KRASG12C-mutated mCRC patients and provide support for first-line decision making. In this setting of patients treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX +/− bevacizumab, irinotecan and oxaliplatin were compared using a propensity-score-matched analysis. The survival superiority of irinotecan was demonstrated over oxaliplatin in KRASG12C-mutated patients, while no differences were observed in a control cohort of KRASG12D-mutated patients. This should be considered when investigating chemotherapy plus targeted agent combinations. Background: KRASG12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has recently been recognized as a distinct druggable molecular entity; however, there are limited data on its sensitivity to standard chemotherapy. In the near future, the combination of chemotherapy plus a KRASG12C-inhibitor might become the standard of care; however, the optimal chemotherapy backbone is unknown. Methods: A multicentre retrospective analysis was conducted including KRASG12C-mutated mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI or FOLFOX +/− bevacizumab. Both unmatched and propensity-score-matched analysis (PSMA) were conducted, with PSMA controlling for: previous adjuvant chemotherapy, ECOG PS, use of bevacizumab in first line, timing of metastasis appearance, time from diagnosis to first-line start, number of metastatic sites, presence of mucinous component, gender, and age. Subgroup analyses were also performed to investigate subgroup treatment–effect interactions. KRASG12D-mutated patients were analysed as control. Results: One hundred and four patients treated with irinotecan-(N = 47) or oxaliplatin-based (N = 57) chemotherapy were included. In the unmatched population, objective response rate (ORR) and median (m) progression-free and overall survival (mPFS and mOS) were comparable between the treatment arms. However, a late (>12 months) PFS advantage was observed with irinotecan (HR 0.62, p = 0.02). In the PSMA-derived cohort, a significant improvement with irinotecan vs. oxaliplatin was observed for both PFS and OS: 12- and 24-month PFS rates of 55% vs. 31% and 40% vs. 0% (HR 0.40, p = 0.01) and mOS 37.9 vs. 21.7 months (HR 0.45, p = 0.045), respectively. According to the subgroup analysis, interaction effects between the presence of lung metastases and treatment groups were found in terms of PFS (p for interaction = 0.08) and OS (p for interaction = 0.03), with a higher benefit from irinotecan in patients without lung metastases. No difference between treatment groups was observed in the KRASG12D-mutated cohort (N = 153). Conclusions: First-line irinotecan-based regimens provided better survival results in KRASG12C-mutated mCRC patients and should be preferred over oxaliplatin. These findings should also be considered when investigating chemotherapy plus targeted agent combinations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: KRAS and BRAF mutations are well-established predictive and prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer; however, their impact in the adjuvant setting has not yet been established.Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of adjuvant phase III trials in patients with stage II and III colon cancer with available data on the impact of KRAS or BRAF mutations on both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Trials were subgrouped based on whether adjustment for microsatellite instability (MSI) was performed and the subgroup effect was analyzed through a meta-regression. To increase the precision of the estimates, a joint DFS-OS (so-called "multivariate") meta-analysis was performed. All statistical tests were 2-sided.Results: Nine trials were selected (QUASAR 2, PETACC-8, N0147, CALGB-89803, NSABP-C07, NSABP-C08, PETACC-3, QUASAR, MOSAIC) including a total of 10 893 patients. In the primary meta-analysis, KRAS mutation was associated with poor DFS (pooled hazard ratio [HR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.61, P < .001) and OS (pooled HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.55, P = .03) and BRAF mutation was also associated with poor DFS (pooled HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.78, P = .05) and OS (pooled HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.70, P < .001). The effect of the mutations on outcome was enhanced in the MSI-adjusted subgroup for both the KRAS mutation (pooled HR for DFS = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.79, P = .001; and pooled HR for OS = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.71, P = .03) and the BRAF mutation (pooled HR for DFS = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.22 to 2.07, P = .001; and pooled HR for OS = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.37 to 2.04, P < .001). The interaction between BRAF and MSI adjustment was statistically significant for DFS (Pinteraction = .02). This interaction was even more pronounced in the DFS-OS multivariate meta-analysis.Conclusions: Both KRAS and BRAF mutations were statistically significantly associated with both DFS and OS, with the mutation effect being enhanced by MSI adjustment. Effective adjuvant treatment for microsatellite-stable BRAF or KRAS-mutated colon cancer represents an unmet clinical need, and exploring the use of recently available BRAF and KRAS inhibitors in this setting would be highly desirable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]