Search

The impact of exercise on pediatric tumor biology is essentially unknown. We explored the effects of regular exercise on tumor proteome profile (as assessed with liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry) in a mouse model of one of the most aggressive childhood malignancies, high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB). Tumor samples of 14 male mice (aged 6–8 wk) that were randomly allocated into an exercise (5-wk combined aerobic and resistance training) or nonexercise control group (6 and 8 mice/group, respectively) were analyzed. The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins database was used to generate a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and enrichment analyses. The Systems Biology Triangle (SBT) algorithm was applied for analyses at the functional category level. Tumors of exercised mice showed a higher and lower abundance of 101 and 150 proteins, respectively, than controls [false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05]. These proteins were enriched in metabolic pathways, amino acid metabolism, regulation of hormone levels, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling (FDR < 0.05). The SBT algorithm indicated that 184 and 126 categories showed a lower and higher abundance, respectively, in the tumors of exercised mice (FDR < 0.01). Categories with lower abundance were involved in energy production, whereas those with higher abundance were related to transcription/translation, apoptosis, and tumor suppression. Regular exercise altered the abundance of hundreds of intratumoral proteins and molecular pathways, particularly those involved in energy metabolism, apoptosis, and tumor suppression. These findings provide preliminary evidence of the molecular mechanisms underlying the potential effects of exercise in HR-NB. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: We used liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry to explore the impact of a 5-wk exercise intervention on the tumor proteome profile in a mouse model of one of the most aggressive childhood malignancies, high-risk neuroblastoma. Exercise altered the abundance of hundreds of proteins and pathways, particularly those involved in energy metabolism and tumor suppression. These molecular changes could mediate, at least partly, the potential antitumorigenic effects of exercise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of resistance power training (RPT, training with the individualized load and repetitions that maximize power output) and cycling power training (CPT, short sprint training) in professional cyclists. Methods: The participants (20 [2] y, peak oxygen uptake 78.0 [4.4] mL·kg−1·min−1) were randomly assigned to perform CPT (n = 8) or RPT (n = 10) in addition to their usual training regime for 7 weeks (2 sessions/wk). The training loads were continuously registered using the session rating of perceived exertion. The outcomes included endurance performance (8-min time trial and incremental test), as well as measures of muscle strength/power (1-repetition maximum and mean maximum propulsive power on the squat, hip thrust, and lunge exercises) and body composition (assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). Results: No between-group differences were found for training loads or for any outcome (P >.05). Both interventions resulted in increased time-trial performance, as well as in improvements in other endurance-related outcomes (ie, ventilatory threshold, respiratory compensation point; P <.05). A significant or quasi-significant increase (P =.068 and.047 for CPT and RPT, respectively) in bone mineral content was observed after both interventions. A significant reduction in fat mass (P =.017), along with a trend (P =.059) toward a reduced body mass, was observed after RPT, but not CPT (P =.076 for the group × time interaction effect). Significant benefits (P <.05) were also observed for most strength-related outcomes after RPT, but not CPT. Conclusion: CPT and RPT are both effective strategies for the improvement of endurance performance and bone health in professional cyclists, although the latter tends to result in greater improvements in body composition and muscle strength/power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Exercise might exert anti-tumoral effects in adult cancers but this question remains open in pediatric tumors, which frequently show a different biology compared to adult malignancies. We studied the effects of an exercise intervention on physical function, immune variables and tumoral response in a preclinical model of a highly aggressive pediatric cancer, high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB). Methods: 6-8-week-old male mice with orthotopically-induced HR-NB were assigned to a control (N=13) or exercise (5-week combined [aerobic+resistance]) group (N=17). Outcomes included physical function (cardiorespiratory fitness [CRF] and muscle strength), as well as related muscle molecular indicators, blood and tumor immune cell and molecular variables, tumor progression, clinical severity, and survival. Results: Exercise attenuated CRF decline (p=0.029 for the group-by-time interaction effect), which was accompanied by higher muscle levels of oxidative capacity (citrate synthase and respiratory chain complexes III, IV and V) and an indicator of antioxidant defense (glutathione reductase) in the intervention arm (all p=0.001), as well as by higher levels of apoptosis (caspase-3, p=0.029) and angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, p=0.012). The proportion of 'hot-like' (i.e., with viable immune infiltrates in flow cytometry analyses) tumors tended to be higher (p=0.0789) in the exercise group (76.9%, vs. 33.3% in control mice). Exercise also promoted greater total immune (p=0.045) and myeloid cell (p=0.049) infiltration within the 'hot' tumors, with a higher proportion of two myeloid cell subsets (CD11C+ [dendritic] cells [p=0.049] and M2-like tumor-associated macrophages [p=0.028]), yet with no significant changes in lymphoid infiltrates or in circulating immune cells or chemokines/cytokines. No training effect was found either for muscle strength or anabolic status, cancer progression (tumor weight and metastasis, tumor microenvironment), clinical severity, or survival. Conclusions: Combined exercise appears as an effective strategy for attenuating physical function decline in a mouse model of HR-NB, also exerting some potential immune benefits within the tumor, which seem overall different from those previously reported in adult cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lung cancer has the highest incidence and mortality rate in the world. One of the most promising new cancer therapies in recent years is immunotherapy, which is based on the blockade of immune checkpoints such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Exercise training is beneficial to maintain and improve the quality of life of cancer patients, and it might also modulate the anti-tumoral efficiency of some chemotherapeutic agents. However, the potential of exercise combined with immunotherapy as a cancer therapy remains to be elucidated. Here, we examined the effects of exercise on tumor growth and its possible adjuvant effects when combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (nivolumab) in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Methods: We generated a PDX model using NOD-SCID gamma mice with subcutaneous grafts from tumor tissue of a patient with NSCLC. Animals were randomly assigned to one of four groups: non-exercise + isotype control (n=5), exercise + isotype control (n=5), non-exercise + nivolumab (n=6) or exercise + nivolumab (n=6). The animals undertook an 8-week moderate-intensity training regimen (treadmill aerobic exercise and strength training). Immunotherapy (nivolumab) or an isotype control was administered 2 days/week, for 6 weeks. Several tumor growth and microenvironment parameters were measured after the intervention. Results: Improvements in aerobic capacity and muscle strength (p=0.027 andp=0.005) were noted in exercised animals. Exercise alone reduced the tumor growth rate with respect to non-exercised mice (p=0.050). The double intervention (exercise + nivolumab) increased tumor necrosis and reduced apoptosis with respect to controls (p=0.026; p=0.030). All interventions achieved a reduction in proliferation compared with the control group (p=0.015, p=0.011, and p=0.011). Exercise alone increased myeloid tumor infiltrates (mostly neutrophils) with respect to the nivolumab only group (p=0.018). Finally, Vegf-a expression was higher in the nivolumab groups (in combination or not with exercise) than in exercise + isotype control group (p=0.045 and p=0.047, respectively). No other significant effects were found. Conclusions: Our results would suggest that aerobic and strength training should be studied as an adjuvant to cancer immunotherapy treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Childhood cancer patients are at risk of developing important adverse effects, mortality and disease relapse after treatments, which has a substantial economic impact on healthcare systems. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of supervised inhospital exercise on clinical endpoints during childhood cancer treatment. 169 children with a new diagnosis of cancer were divided into an exercise intervention (n = 68, 11 ± 4 years) or a control group (n = 101, 11 ± 3 years). The cohort was followed up from the start of treatment for up to five years. Supervised inhospital exercise intervention was performed during the neoadjuvant (for solid tumors) or intensive chemotherapy treatment period (for leukemias). The median duration of the intervention was 22 (interquartile range, 14‐28) weeks. We assessed survival, risk of disease relapse or metastasis, and days of hospitalization (primary outcomes), and cardiovascular function, anthropometry and blood variables (secondary outcomes). No exercise‐related adverse events were noted. The exercise group had significantly less days of hospitalization than the control group (P = .031), resulting in a lower (~−17%) mean total economic cost of hospitalization in the former. Moreover, echocardiography‐determined left ventricular function (ejection fraction and fractional shortening) was significantly impaired in the control group after treatment compared with baseline, whereas it was maintained in the exercise group (P = .024 and.021 for the between‐group differences, respectively). In conclusion, supervised inhospital exercise intervention is safe and plays a cardioprotective role, at least in the short term, in children with cancer, also reducing hospitalization time, and therefore alleviating the economic burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]