Search

BackgroundLittle is known about the role of global DNA methylation in recurrence and chemoresistance of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).MethodsWe performed whole genome bisulfite sequencing and transcriptome sequencing in 62 primary and recurrent tumors from 28 patients with stage III/IV HGSOC, of which 11 patients carried germline, pathogenic BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations.ResultsLandscapes of genome-wide methylation (on average 24.2 million CpGs per tumor) and transcriptomes in primary and recurrent tumors showed extensive heterogeneity between patients but were highly preserved in tumors from the same patient. We identified significant differences in the burden of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in tumors from BRCA1/2 compared to non-BRCA1/2 carriers (mean 659 DMRs and 388 DMRs in paired comparisons respectively). We identified overexpression of immune pathways in BRCA1/2 carriers compared to non-carriers, implicating an increased immune response in improved survival (P = 0.006) in these BRCA1/2 carriers.ConclusionThese findings indicate methylome and gene expression programs established in the primary tumor are conserved throughout disease progression, even after extensive chemotherapy treatment, and that changes in methylation and gene expression are unlikely to serve as drivers for chemoresistance in HGSOC.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the combination of pembrolizumab, cisplatin and gemcitabine in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.MethodsPatients received six cycles of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin on day 1 and day 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle. Pembrolizumab was administered on day 1 of cycles 3-6 and as maintenance monotherapy in cycles 7-34. Palliative radiation to a non-target symptomatic lesion was allowed. The primary objective was overall response rate by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival, time to progression, duration of response and overall survival.ResultsAn interim analysis for futility was performed at 18 evaluable patients. Overall response rate was 60%, duration of response was 4.9 months and time to progression was 5.2 months. Progression-free survival at 6 and 12 months was 43% and 5%. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months and median overall survival was 11.3 months. In all patients, CA125 levels reflected response and progression. There were no pseudoprogression events. After receiving palliative radiation during pembrolizumab maintenance, a patient with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma had an exceptional and durable response that is ongoing for greater than 2 years. After consultation with the sponsor, based on the modest duration of response observed at the interim analysis for futility, the decision was made to close the trial to further accrual.ConclusionsThe addition of pembrolizumab to cisplatin and gemcitabine did not appear to provide benefit beyond chemotherapy alone in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

BRCA1 or 2 mutations result in higher cancer risk for breast cancer (BC) and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) for carriers than exists in the general population. Optimal breast imaging surveillance in these patients has not been well defined. An Institutional Review Board-approved, multi-institutional retrospective chart review was performed. Patients diagnosed with BRCA-associated EOC between 1990-2015 were identified; demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. 192 BRCA mutation-positive patients with EOC were identified. 16/192 (8.3%) women were diagnosed with BC following EOC, at a median of 50 (range 5-327) months following EOC diagnosis and median age 59.5 (45-84) years. Breast cancer was most commonly detected on mammogram 7/16 (44%) or clinical exam 7/16 (44%). 2/16 (12.5%) had occult BC found during risk-reducing mastectomy. 14 (88%) had early-stage (0-2) disease. At mean follow-up of 8.1 years, 6 (37.5%) patients with BC following EOC had died due to EOC. The risk of BC diagnosis following EOC in BRCA mutation carriers is low; most of these BCs are early stage and diagnosed with mammography or physical exam. Overall, survival in BRCA mutation carriers is dominated by EOC-related mortality. Breast cancer surveillance in BRCA mutation carriers following EOC should prioritize nonsurgical strategies.

BackgroundObservational studies suggest greater height is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, but cannot exclude bias and/or confounding as explanations for this. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can provide evidence which may be less prone to bias.MethodsWe pooled data from 39 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies (16,395 cases; 23,003 controls). We applied two-stage predictor-substitution MR, using a weighted genetic risk score combining 609 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted height and risk were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.ResultsGreater genetically predicted height was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk overall (pooled-OR (pOR) = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 per 5 cm increase in height), and separately for invasive (pOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and borderline (pOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) tumours.ConclusionsWomen with a genetic propensity to being taller have increased risk of ovarian cancer. This suggests genes influencing height are involved in pathways promoting ovarian carcinogenesis.

ImportanceBRCA mutation carriers are at increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, the incidence of breast cancer after a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), one of the tubal/peritoneal cancers collectively referred to as pelvic serous carcinomas, is not well known. Optimal breast cancer surveillance and detection for these patients have also not been well characterized.ObjectivesTo determine the incidence of breast cancer after a diagnosis of EOC and to evaluate the need for breast cancer surveillance for these patients.Design, setting, and participantsA retrospective database review of 364 patients who underwent BRCA mutation testing for EOC (stages I-IV) between 1998 and 2012 at an academic medical center with gynecologic and breast cancer centers.Main outcomes and measuresIncidence of breast cancer and methods of surveillance.ResultsOf 364 patients, 135 (37.1%) were found to carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The mean age of patients at diagnosis of EOC was 49.5 years (range, 28-89 years). Of the 135 patients, 12 (8.9%) developed breast cancer. The median time from diagnosis of EOC to diagnosis of breast cancer was 50.5 months. Annual mammography was performed for 80 patients (59.3%), with annual magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts performed for 60 patients (44.4%). Thirteen patients (9.6%) underwent a bilateral prophylactic mastectomy at a median of 23 months following EOC diagnosis. Breast cancer was most commonly diagnosed by mammography for 7 of the 12 patients (58.3%), 3 (25.0%) of whom had a palpable mass and 2 (16.7%) of whom had incidental breast cancer detected during a prophylactic mastectomy. Seven patients with breast cancer (58.3%) underwent a bilateral mastectomy. All patients had early-stage breast cancer (stages 0-II). Four patients (33.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, 4 of the 12 patients (33.3%) died of recurrent EOC after a diagnosis of breast cancer. The overall 10-year survival rate for the entire cohort of 135 patients was 17.0%.Conclusions and relevanceThe risk of metachronous breast cancer is low in patients with known BRCA mutations and EOC. A majority of these cases of breast cancer at an early stage are detected by use of mammography. Despite the small number of patients in our study, these results suggest that optimal breast cancer surveillance for patients with BRCA-associated EOC needs to be reevaluated given the low incidence of breast cancer among these high-risk patients. Confirmation of our findings from larger studies seems to be indicated.

Purpose: This paper reports the efficacy of the poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib alone and in combination with the antiangiogenesis agent cediranib compared with cediranib alone in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Methods: This was open‐label, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03660826). Eligible patients had recurrent endometrial cancer, received at least one (<3) prior lines of chemotherapy, and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by histology (serous vs. other) to receive cediranib alone (reference arm), olaparib, or olaparib and cediranib for 28‐day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression‐free survival in the intention‐to‐treat population. Homologous repair deficiency was explored using the BROCA‐GO sequencing panel. Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled and all were included in the intention‐to‐treat analysis. Median age was 66 (range, 41–86) years and 47 (39.2%) had serous histology. Median progression‐free survival for cediranib was 3.8 months compared with 2.0 months for olaparib (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.91‐2.3] p =.935) and 5.5 months for olaparib/cediranib (hazard ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.43–1.14] p =.064). Four patients receiving the combination had a durable response lasting more than 20 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hypertension in the cediranib (36%) and olaparib/cediranib (33%) arms, fatigue (20.5% olaparib/cediranib), and diarrhea (17.9% cediranib). The BROCA‐GO panel results were not associated with response. Conclusion: The combination of cediranib and olaparib demonstrated modest clinical efficacy; however, the primary end point of the study was not met. The combination was safe without unexpected toxicity. Randomized study of cediranib compared with olaparib and the combination for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer demonstrated progression‐free survival of 3.8, 2.0, and 5.5 months respectively. The treatment toxicities were manageable but the study did not meet its primary end point. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As a class, PARPis work by disrupting DNA repair; however, they are metabolized by different pathways. Niraparib is metabolized by carboxylesterase-catalyzed amide hydrolysis, whereas olaparib and rucaparib are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Drugdrug interactions (DDIs) with other medications may change PARPi efficacy or safety in patients with aOC. Objective: This US-based, real-world study aimed to quantify and characterize patients with aOC who received CYP-inhibiting/inducing (CYP-i/i) medications when they initiated treatment or were eligible to receive PARPi first-line maintenance therapy (1LMT), to better understand the potential for DDIs with PARPis and other CYP-metabolized medications. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data with Optum® Enriched Oncology, which deterministically links medical and pharmacy claims with electronic health record data from providers across the continuum of care. Eligible patients were diagnosed with aOC between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2021; were aged ≥18 years at end of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (index date); had confirmed CYP-i/i medication use (≥1 claim between 90 days before to 120 days after index date); and had received or were eligible to receive PARPi 1LMT. Strong/moderate CYP-i/i medications were defined based on estimates of how much they increased/decreased drug exposure over time (area under the plasma concentration--time curve ratio). Patients in the PARPi-treated group received PARPi monotherapy for 1LMT (olaparib/rucaparib/niraparib). Patients in the PARPi-eligible group did not receive 1LMT within 120 days or start second-line treatment within 60 days of the index date. Descriptive statistics were used for patient characteristics. Results: The analysis included 1411 patients (PARPi treated, n=158; PARPi eligible, n=1253). Median age was 63 years for PARPi-treated patients and 64 years for PARPi-eligible patients. Among PARPi-treated patients, 46% (n=73) used niraparib, and 54% (n=85) used other PARPis metabolized by the CYP system (olaparib, 49% [n=77]; rucaparib, 5% [n=8]). The percentage of patients taking a strong/ moderate CYP-i/i medication was 38% (n=60) for the overall PARPi-treated group, 42% (n=36) for PARPi-treated patients who received olaparib or rucaparib, and 33% (n=414) for the PARPi-eligible group. For each group, the most common strong/moderate CYP-i/i medications were antiemetics and fluoroquinolone antibiotics (overall PARPi treated, 48% [n=29] and 28% [n=17], respectively; PARPi-treated olaparib/rucaparib, 50% [n=18] and 25% [n=9], respectively; and PARPi eligible, 41% [n=169] and 37% [n=154], respectively). Other common strong/moderate CYP-i/i medications were imidazole-related antifungals, calcium channel--blocking blood pressure medications, and topical antifungals. Conclusions: Patients with aOC may be treated with PARPi 1LMT to delay or prevent recurrence. Multiple PARPi options exist, including niraparib, which is metabolized by carboxylesterase-catalyzed amide hydrolysis, and olaparib and rucaparib, which are metabolized by the CYP system. In this analysis, 38% of PARPi-treated and 33% of PARPi-eligible patients with aOC also received medications that were strong/moderate CYP-i/i. Cotreatment with CYP-metabolized PARPis and CYP-i/i medications could potentially lead to DDIs that could alter the efficacy and tolerability of the PARPis. Additional studies are needed to understand this important issue. Funding: Funding for this study was provided by GSK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: There is a paucity of data analyzing the anatomic locations and dose volume metrics achieved for surgically transposed ovaries in patients desiring fertility or hormonal preservation receiving pelvic radiation therapy (RT), which were examined herein., Methods and Materials: This is a retrospective study including women who underwent ovarian transposition before pelvic RT between 2010 to 2020. The craniocaudal (CC) distance of the ovary centroid to the (1) plane of the sacral promontory, (2) iliac crest, and (3) the nearest distance between the ovary edge and RT planning target volume (PTV) were measured (cm). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and cut-point analysis estimating ovary location outside the PTV was performed., Results: Thirty-one ovaries were analyzed from 18 patients. Thirteen (72.2%) were treated with intensity modulated RT, and 5 (27.8%) were treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Most ovaries were located above the sacral promontory (64.5%, n = 20), below the iliac crest (96.8%, n = 30), and outside the PTV (64.5%, n = 20). The median distance from the ovaries to the sacral promontory, iliac crest, and PTV was 0.8 cm (interquartile range [IQR], -0.83 to 1.59 cm), -3.22 cm (IQR, -5.12 to -1.84 cm), and 0.9 cm (IQR, -1.0 to 1.9 cm), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and cut-point analysis demonstrated that distance from the iliac crest predicted an ovary to be outside the PTV with an optimal cut-point of -3.0 cm (C-index = 0.82). The median mean and maximum (Dmax) ovary doses were 15.5 Gy (IQR, 9.6-20.2 Gy) and 32.2 Gy (IQR 24.8-46.5 Gy), respectively., Conclusions: Despite most transposed ovaries being located outside the PTV, nearly all remained below the iliac crest and received RT doses associated with a high risk of ovarian failure. These findings deepen our understanding of the spatial relationship between transposed ovaries and dose to inform surgical and pre-RT planning and suggest that more aggressive ovary-sparing strategies are warranted., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Background: Niraparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in patients with ovarian cancer. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib versus placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer., Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA cohort and non-gBRCA cohort) and the type of non-gBRCA mutation and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival., Results: Of 553 enrolled patients, 203 were in the gBRCA cohort (with 138 assigned to niraparib and 65 to placebo), and 350 patients were in the non-gBRCA cohort (with 234 assigned to niraparib and 116 to placebo). Patients in the niraparib group had a significantly longer median duration of progression-free survival than did those in the placebo group, including 21.0 vs. 5.5 months in the gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.41), as compared with 12.9 months vs. 3.8 months in the non-gBRCA cohort for patients who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.59) and 9.3 months vs. 3.9 months in the overall non-gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61; P<0.001 for all three comparisons). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in the niraparib group were thrombocytopenia (in 33.8%), anemia (in 25.3%), and neutropenia (in 19.6%), which were managed with dose modifications., Conclusions: Among patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of gBRCA mutations or HRD status, with moderate bone marrow toxicity. (Funded by Tesaro; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01847274 .).