Search

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the longitudinal postoperative relationship between physical activity, psychosocial factors, and physical function in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.Methods: We enrolled 248 participants undergoing surgery for a degenerative lumbar spine condition. Physical activity was measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X) at 6-weeks (6wk), 6-months (6M), 12-months (12M) and 24-months (24M) following spine surgery. Physical function (computerized adaptive test domain version of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) and psychosocial factors (pain self-efficacy, depression and fear of movement) were assessed at preoperative visit and 6wk, 6M, 12M and 24M after surgery. Structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques were utilized to analyze data, and results are represented as standardized regression weights (SRW). Overall SRW were computed across five imputed datasets to account for missing data. The mediation effect of each psychosocial factor on the effect of physical activity on physical function were computed [(SRW for effect of activity on psychosocial factor X SRW for effect of psychosocial factor on function) ÷ SRW for effect of activity on function]. Each SEM model was tested for model fit by assessing established fit indexes.Results: The overall effect of steps per day on physical function (SRW ranged from 0.08 to 0.19, p<0.05) was stronger compared to the overall effect of physical function on steps per day (SRW ranged from non-existent to 0.14, p<0.01 to 0.3). The effect of steps per day on physical function and function on steps per day remained consistent after accounting for psychosocial factors in each of the mediation models. Depression and fear of movement at 6M mediated 3.4% and 5.4% of the effect of steps per day at 6wk on physical function at 12M, respectively. Pain self-efficacy was not a statistically significant mediator.Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the relationship between physical activity and physical function is stronger than the relationship of function to activity. However, future research is needed to examine whether promoting physical activity during the early postoperative period may result in improvement of long-term physical function. Since depression and fear of movement had a very small mediating effect, additional work is needed to investigate other potential mediating factors such as pain catastrophizing, resilience and exercise self-efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spine surgery outcomes are variable. Patients who participate in and take responsibility for their recovery have improved health outcomes. Interventions to increase patient involvement in their care may improve health outcomes after a surgical procedure. We conducted a prospective interventional trial to compare the effectiveness of health behavior change counseling with usual care to improve health outcomes after lumbar spine surgical procedures.Methods: In this study, 122 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing a decompression surgical procedure from December 2009 through August 2012 were enrolled. Participants were assigned, according to enrollment date, to health behavior change counseling or usual care. Health behavior change counseling is a brief, telephone-based intervention intended to increase rehabilitation engagement through motivational interviewing strategies that elicit and strengthen motivation for change. Health behavior change counseling was designed to identify patients with low patient activation, to maximize postoperative rehabilitation engagement, to decrease pain and disability, and to improve functional recovery. Participants were assessed before the surgical procedure and for 3 years after the surgical procedure for pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and physical health (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, version 2). Differences in changes in health outcomes after the surgical procedure were compared between the health behavior change counseling group and the usual care group.Results: By 12 months, health behavior change counseling participants reported significantly greater reductions in pain intensity (p = 0.008) and disability (p = 0.028) and significantly greater improvement in physical health compared with usual care participants (p = 0.025). These differences were attenuated by 24 and 36 months after the surgical procedure. Early improvements in health outcomes were mediated by improvements in physical therapist-rated engagement and self-reported attendance at physical therapy sessions in the health behavior change counseling group.Conclusions: Health behavior change counseling improved health outcomes during the first 12 months after the surgical procedure through changes in rehabilitation engagement. Wider use of health behavior change counseling may lead to improved outcomes not only after lumbar spine surgery but also in other conditions for which rehabilitation is key to recovery.Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The minimum clinically important difference is a clinically relevant threshold of improvement. A substantial clinical benefit is a threshold of change that correlates with clinically important improvement. The Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire is a disease-specific, patient-reported outcomes instrument that was developed to be sensitive to changes associated with surgical treatment for degenerative cervical disc disease. To determine thresholds for change in these domain scores that are important from the patient's perspective, we estimated the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit values for this questionnaire's domain scores.Methods: We evaluated 252 patients from the Cervical Spine Research Society Outcomes Study at their six-month follow-up visits after anterior cervical spine decompression and arthrodesis. Using a receiver operating characteristics curve, with the health transition item of the Short Form-36 as an anchor, we determined that the minimum clinically important difference (the value that maximized sensitivity and specificity to differentiate the "somewhat better" and "much better" responses from others) and the substantial clinical benefit (the value that maximized sensitivity and specificity to differentiate the "much better" response from others) for our questionnaire's domain scores. Responses were scaled between 0 and 1 point; higher scores denoted more severe impairment. Patient and clinical characteristics were tested to determine their influence on score changes.Results: The minimum clinically important difference ranged from 0.13 point (for functional disability) to 0.24 point (for arm/shoulder pain). The substantial clinical benefit score ranged from 0.20 point (for functional disability or physical symptoms other than pain) to 0.30 point (for neck or arm/shoulder pain). Age, sex, and duration of current symptoms were not associated with change in our questionnaire's domain scores.Conclusions: A 0.13-point change in the functional disability domain score indicated a clinically important difference in a self-reported outcome after anterior cervical spine surgery. A 0.30-point change in neck pain after surgery indicated a clinically important clinical benefit. This information, coupled with previous reports of the psychometric stability of the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire, should increase the clinical utility of this patient-reported outcomes instrument. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focuses on educational opportunities of medical students and surgeons offered by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Goal to meet the expectations in academic practice; Commitment to help young members to establish a relationship with the Academy; Formation of a resident liaison council accredited by the orthopedic residency program.

Background: The United States has the highest rate of lumbar spine surgery in the world, with rates increasing over 200% since 1990. Medicare spends over $1 billion annually on lumbar spine surgery. Despite surgical advances, up to 40% of patients report chronic pain and disability following surgery. Our work has demonstrated that fear of movement is a risk factor for increased pain and disability and decreased physical function in patients following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and self-management treatments have the potential to address psychosocial risk factors and improve outcomes after spine surgery, but are unavailable or insufficiently adapted for postoperative care. Our research team developed a cognitive-behavioral based self-management approach to postoperative rehabilitation (Changing Behavior through Physical Therapy (CBPT)). Pilot testing of the CBPT program demonstrated greater improvement in pain, disability, physical and mental health, and physical performance compared to education. The current study compares which of two treatments provided by telephone - a CBPT Program or an Education Program about postoperative recovery - are more effective for improving patient-centered outcomes in adults following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions.Methods/design: A multi-center, comparative effectiveness trial will be conducted. Two hundred and sixty patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions will be recruited from two medical centers and community surgical practices. Participants will be randomly assigned to CBPT or Education at 6 weeks following surgery. Treatments consist of six weekly telephone sessions with a trained physical therapist. The primary outcome will be disability and secondary outcomes include pain, general health, and physical activity. Outcomes will be assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after surgery by an assessor masked to group allocation.Discussion: Effective rehabilitation treatments that can guide clinicians in their recommendations, and patients in their actions will have the potential to effect change in current clinical practice.Trial Registration: NCT02184143. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Since implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, more Americans have health insurance, and many racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare have improved. We previously reported that Black and Hispanic patients undergo surgery for spinal stenosis at lower rates than do white patients.Purpose: To assess changes in racial/ethnic disparities in rates of lumbar spinal surgery after passage of the ACA.Study Design: Retrospective analysis.Patient Sample: Approximately 3.2 million adults who underwent lumbar spinal surgery in the US from 2006 through 2014.Outcome Measures: Racial disparities in discharge rates before versus after ACA passage.Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Survey Supplement, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, criteria for definite lumbar spinal surgery, we calculated rates of lumbar spinal surgery as the number of hospital discharges divided by population estimates and stratified patients by race/ethnicity after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. Calendar years were stratified as before ACA passage (2006-2010) or after ACA passage (2011-2014). Poisson regression was used to model hospital discharge rates as a function of race/ethnicity before and after ACA passage after adjustment for potential confounders.Results: All rates are expressed per 1,000 persons. The overall median discharge rate decreased from 1.9 before ACA passage to 1.6 after ACA passage (p < .001). After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, the Black:White disparity in discharge rates decreased from 0.40:1 before ACA to 0.44:1 after ACA (p < .001). A similar decrease in the Hispanic:White disparity occurred, from 0.35:1 before ACA to 0.38:1 after ACA (p < .001).Conclusion: Small but significant decreases occurred in racial/ethnic disparities in hospital discharge rates for lumbar spinal surgery after ACA passage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Pain self-efficacy, or the belief that one can carry out activities despite pain, has been shown to be associated with back and neck pain severity. However, the literature correlating psychosocial factors to opioid use, barriers to proper opioid use, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores is sparse., Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether pain self-efficacy is associated with daily opioid use in patients presenting for spine surgery. The secondary aim was to determine whether there exists a threshold self-efficacy score that is predictive of daily preoperative opioid use and subsequently to correlate this threshold score with opioid beliefs, disability, resilience, patient activation, and PROMIS scores., Patient Sample: Five hundred seventy-eight elective spine surgery patients (286 females; mean age of 55 years) from a single institution were included in this study., Study Design/setting: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data., Outcome Measures: PROMIS scores, daily opioid use, opioid beliefs, disability, patient activation, resilience., Methods: Elective spine surgery patients at a single institution completed questionnaires preoperatively. Pain self-efficacy was measured by the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). Threshold linear regression with Bayesian information criteria was utilized to identify the optimal threshold associated with daily opioid use. Multivariable analysis controlled for age, sex, education, income, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and PROMIS-29, version 2 scores., Results: Of 578 patients, 100 (17.3%) reported daily opioid use. Threshold regression identified a PSEQ cutoff score of <22 as predictive of daily opioid use. On multivariable logistic regression, patients with a PSEQ score <22 had two times greater odds of being daily opioid users than those with a score ≥22. Further, PSEQ <22 was associated with lower patient activation; increased leg and back pain; higher ODI; higher PROMIS pain, fatigue, depression, and sleep scores; and lower PROMIS physical function and social satisfaction scores (p<.05 for all)., Conclusions: In patients presenting for elective spine surgery, a PSEQ score of <22 is associated with twice the odds of reporting daily opioid use. Further, this threshold is associated with greater pain, disability, fatigue, and depression. A PSEQ score <22 can identify patients at high risk for daily opioid use and can guide targeted rehabilitation to optimize postoperative quality of life., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests One or more of the authors declare financial or professional relationships on ICMJE-TSJ disclosure forms., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data., Objective: To assess the association between preoperative and postoperative mental health status with postoperative satisfaction in lumbar degenerative surgery patients., Summary of Background Data: Poor preoperative mental health has been shown to negatively affect postoperative satisfaction among spine surgery patients, but there is limited evidence on the impact of postoperative mental health on satisfaction., Materials and Methods: Adult patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative conditions at a single institution were included. Mental health was assessed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression and Anxiety scores. Satisfaction was assessed 12 months postoperatively using North American Spine Society Patient Satisfaction Index. The authors evaluated associations between mental health and satisfaction with univariate and multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounders. Preoperative depression/anxiety level was corrected for postoperative depression/anxiety level, and vice versa. Statistical significance was assessed at α=0.05., Results: A total of 183 patients (47% male individuals; avg. age, 62 y) were included. Depression was present in 27% preoperatively and 29% postoperatively, and anxiety in 50% preoperatively and 31% postoperatively. Ninteen percent reported postoperative dissatisfaction using the North American Spine Society Patient Satisfaction Index. Univariate analysis identified race, family income, relationship status, current smoking status, change in pain interference, and change in physical function as potential confounders. In adjusted analysis, odds of dissatisfaction were increased in those with mild postoperative depression (adjusted odds ratio=6.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-32; P=0.03) and moderate or severe postoperative depression (adjusted odds ratio=7.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-52; P=0.03). Preoperative and postoperative anxiety and preoperative depression were not associated with postoperative satisfaction., Conclusions: Following lumbar degenerative surgery, patients with postoperative depression, irrespective of preoperative depression status, have significantly higher odds of dissatisfaction. These results emphasize the importance of postoperative screening and treatment of depression in spine patients with dissatisfaction., Level of Evidence: Level III-nonrandomized cohort study., Competing Interests: R.R. received grant (TL1 TR003100) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate whether early postoperative walking is associated with "best outcome" and no opioid use at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery and establish a threshold for steps/day to inform clinical practice., Design: Secondary analysis from randomized controlled trial., Setting: Two academic medical centers in the United States., Participants: We enrolled 248 participants undergoing surgery for a degenerative lumbar spine condition (N=248). A total of 212 participants (mean age, 62.8±11.4y, 53.3% female) had valid walking data at baseline., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: Disability (Oswestry Disability Index), back and leg pain (Brief Pain Inventory), and opioid use (yes vs no) were assessed at baseline and 1 year after surgery. "Best outcome" was defined as Oswestry Disability Index ≤20, back pain ≤2, and leg pain ≤2. Steps/day (walking) was assessed with an accelerometer worn for at least 3 days and 10 h/d at 6 weeks after spine surgery, which was considered as study baseline. Separate multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between steps/day at 6 weeks and "best outcome" and no opioid use at 1-year. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a steps/day threshold for achieving outcomes., Results: Each additional 1000 steps/d at 6 weeks after spine surgery was associated with 41% higher odds of achieving "best outcome" (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.74) and 38% higher odds of no opioid use (95% CI, 1.09-1.76) at 1 year. Walking ≥3500 steps/d was associated with 3.75 times the odds (95% CI, 1.56-9.02) of achieving "best outcome" and 2.37 times the odds (95% CI, 1.07-5.24) of not using opioids., Conclusions: Walking early after surgery may optimize patient-reported outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. A 3500 steps/d threshold may serve as an initial recommendation during early postoperative counseling., (Copyright © 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify spine patients' barriers to appropriate postoperative opioid use, comfort with naloxone, knowledge of safe opioid disposal practices, and associated factors., Methods: We preoperatively surveyed 174 spine patients about psychobehavioral barriers to appropriate opioid use, comfort with naloxone, and knowledge about opioid disposal. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with barriers and knowledge (α = 0.05)., Results: Common barriers were fear of addiction (71%) and concern about disease progression (43%). Most patients (78%) had neutral/low confidence in the ability of nonopioid medications to control pain; most (57%) felt neutral or uncomfortable with using naloxone; and most (86%) were familiar with safe disposal. Anxiety was associated with fear of distracting the physician (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-14) and with lower odds of knowing safe disposal methods (aOR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.72). Opioid use during the preceding month was associated with comfort with naloxone (aOR, 4.9; 95% CI, 2.1-12). Patients with a higher educational level had lower odds of reporting fear of distracting the physician (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97), and those with previous postoperative opioid use had lower odds of concern about disease progression (aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.63) and with a belief in tolerating pain (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.95)., Conclusions: Many spine patients report barriers to appropriate postoperative opioid use and are neutral or uncomfortable with naloxone. Some are unfamiliar with safe disposal. Associated factors include anxiety, lack of recent opioid use, and no previous postoperative use., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To evaluate the risks and benefits of crossing the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) in cervical arthrodesis., Summary of Background Data: Whether the CTJ should be crossed in cervical arthrodesis remains up for debate. Keeping C7 as the distal end of the fusion risks adjacent segment disease (ASD) and can result in myelopathy or radiculopathy. Longer fusions are thought to increase operative risk and complexity but result in lower rates of ASD., Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing cervical spine fusion surgery ending at C7 or T1 with ≥1-year follow-up were included. To evaluate operative risk, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, and length of hospital stay were collected. To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and SF-12 questionnaires (PCS12 and MCS12) were obtained at follow-up. Revision surgery data were also obtained., Results: A total of 168 patients were included and divided into a C7 end-of-fusion cohort (NC7=59) and a T1 end-of-fusion cohort (NT1=109). Multivariate regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, race, surgical approach, and number of levels fused showed that EBL (P=0.12), operative time (P=0.07), and length of hospital stay (P=0.06) are not significantly different in the C7 and T1 end-of-fusion cohorts. Multivariate regression of PROs showed no significant difference in NDI (P=0.70), PCS12 (P=0.23), or MCS12 (P=0.15) between cohorts. Fisher analysis showed significantly higher revision rates in the C7 end-of-fusion cohort (7/59 for C7 vs. 2/109 for T1; odds ratio, 6.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-65.1; P=0.01)., Conclusions: Crossing the CTJ in cervical arthrodesis does not increase operative risk as measured by blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. However, it leads to lower revision rates, likely because of the avoidance of ASD, and comparable PROs. Thus, crossing the CTJ may help prevent ASD without negatively affecting operative risk or long-term PROs.

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is associated with intervertebral disc degeneration of spinal instability. Here, we report that the cilia of nucleus pulposus (NP) cells mediate mechanotransduction to maintain anabolic activity in the discs. We found that mechanical stress promotes transport of parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R) to the cilia and enhances parathyroid hormone (PTH) signaling in NP cells. PTH induces transcription of integrin α v β 6 to activate the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-connective tissue growth factor (CCN2)-matrix proteins signaling cascade. Intermittent injection of PTH (iPTH) effectively attenuates disc degeneration of aged mice by direct signaling through NP cells, specifically improving intervertebral disc height and volume by increasing levels of TGF-β activity, CCN2, and aggrecan. PTH1R is expressed in both mouse and human NP cells. Importantly, knockout PTH1R or cilia in the NP cells results in significant disc degeneration and blunts the effect of PTH on attenuation of aged discs. Thus, mechanical stress-induced transport of PTH1R to the cilia enhances PTH signaling, which helps maintain intervertebral disc homeostasis, particularly during aging, indicating therapeutic potential of iPTH for DDD., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Study Design: Retrospective analysis., Objective: To determine the association of hospital and patient population characteristics with charges and payments for Medicare patients undergoing cervical spine surgery., Summary of Background Data: Third-party payers such as Medicare pay negotiated rates for health care services that represent a substantial savings from hospitals' list prices. Previous research has shown geographical variation in hospital charges. However, the association with other hospital and patient population characteristics is poorly understood., Methods: We determined the association of hospital characteristics (hospital size, ownership, location, teaching status, procedure volume, and geographical region) and patient population characteristics (proportion female, nonwhite, or with ≥1 comorbid conditions) with excess charges (difference between hospital charges and payments) and cost-to-charge ratio (ratio of payments to hospital charges) for Medicare patients undergoing cervical spine fusion without complication (MS-DRG 473). Significance levels were set at a P value less than 0.05., Results: The median excess charge was $59,799 (interquartile range, $41,668, $69,576) and cost-to-charge ratio was 25.8% (interquartile range, 20.4%, 32.7%). Higher excess charges were observed for urban hospitals (P = 0.003). There was an association between excess charges and procedure volume (P = 0.034) and proportion of patients with 1 or more comorbid conditions (P = 0.008). There were no differences based on hospital size, ownership, teaching status, geographical region, or proportion of female or nonwhite patients.Private hospitals had higher cost-to-charge ratios than government hospitals (P = 0.017). There was no association with hospital size, teaching status, geographical region, procedure volume, or proportion of patients who were female, nonwhite, or who had 1 or more comorbid conditions., Conclusion: The relationship between hospital charges and payments for cervical spine surgery without complication is associated with certain hospital and patient population characteristics. Further study is needed to determine whether these differences are associated with health outcomes., Level of Evidence: 3.

Objective: To determine the effect of health behavior change counseling (HBCC) on patient activation and the influence of patient activation on rehabilitation engagement, and to identify common barriers to engagement among individuals undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis., Design: Prospective clinical trial., Setting: Academic medical center., Participants: Consecutive lumbar spine surgery patients (N=122) defined in our companion article (Part I) were assigned to a control group (did not receive HBCC, n=59) or HBCC group (received HBCC, n=63)., Intervention: Brief motivational interviewing-based HBCC versus control (significance, P<.05)., Main Outcome Measures: We assessed patient activation before and after intervention. Rehabilitation engagement was assessed using the physical therapist-reported Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale and by a ratio of self-reported physical therapy and home exercise completion. Common barriers to rehabilitation engagement were identified through thematic analysis., Results: Patient activation predicted engagement (standardized regression weight, .682; P<.001). Postintervention patient activation was predicted by baseline patient activation (standardized regression weight, .808; P<.001) and receipt of HBCC (standardized regression weight, .444; P<.001). The effect of HBCC on rehabilitation engagement was mediated by patient activation (standardized regression weight, .079; P=.395). One-third of the HBCC group did not show improvement compared with the control group. Thematic analysis identified 3 common barriers to engagement: (1) low self-efficacy because of lack of knowledge and support (62%); (2) anxiety related to fear of movement (57%); and (3) concern about pain management (48%)., Conclusions: The influence of HBCC on rehabilitation engagement was mediated by patient activation. Despite improvements in patient activation, one-third of patients reported low rehabilitation engagement. Addressing these barriers should lead to greater improvements in rehabilitation engagement., (Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine whether a brief motivational interviewing [MI]-based health behavior change counseling (HBCC) intervention increased patient participation in physical therapy and/or home exercise programs (HEPs), reduced disability, and improved health status after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis., Design: Prospective clinical trial., Setting: Academic medical center., Participants: From December 2009 through August 2012, consecutive patients (N=122) underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and, based on enrollment date, were prospectively assigned to a control (n=59) or HBCC intervention (n=63) group in a prospective, lagged-control clinical trial., Interventions: Brief MI-based HBCC versus attention control., Main Outcome Measures: Rehabilitation participation (primary); disability and health status (secondary). Therapists assessed engagement in, and patients reported attendance at, postoperative rehabilitation (physical therapy and/or HEP). At 3 and 6 months, disability and health status were assessed (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, version 2 [SF-12v2]) (significance, P<.05)., Results: Compared with controls, HBCC patients had significantly higher rehabilitation engagement (21.20±4.56 vs 23.57±2.71, respectively; P<.001), higher physical therapy (.67±.21 vs .82±.16, respectively; P<.001) and HEP (.65±.23 vs .75±.22, respectively; P=.019) attendance, and better functional outcomes at 3 months (difference: ODI, -10.7±4.4, P=.015; SF-12v2, 6.2±2.2, P=.004) and 6 months (difference: ODI, -12.7±4.8, P=.008; SF-12v2, 8.9±2.4, P<.001). The proportion of the HBCC intervention impact on functional recovery mediated by rehabilitation participation was approximately half at 3 months and one-third at 6 months., Conclusions: HBCC can improve outcomes after spine surgery through improved rehabilitation participation., (Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: A retrospective review., Objective: Our goals were: (1) to document national trends in total hospital charges and length of stay (LOS) associated with anterior cervical spine procedures from 2000 through 2009 and (2) to evaluate how those trends relate to demographic factors., Summary of Background Data: Since 2000, the number of anterior cervical spine procedures has increased dramatically in the United States., Materials and Methods: We reviewed 86,622,872 hospital discharge records (2000-2009) from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and used ICD-9-CM codes to identify anterior cervical spine procedures (927,103). We assessed those records for outcomes (total hospital charges, LOS) and covariates (age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, geographic location, comorbidities, presence of traumatic cervical spine injury on admission) of interest and determined (with multivariable linear regression models) the independent effects of covariates on outcomes (significance, P<0.05)., Results: From 2000 through 2009, yearly charges significantly increased ($1.62 billion to $5.63 billion, respectively) and LOS significantly decreased (2.23±0.043 d to 2.20±0.045 d, respectively). The average hospital charges increased yearly after adjustment for covariates. All covariates but age were significant, independent predictors of hospital charges and LOS., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this investigation is the first to identify the significant demographic predictors of hospital charges and LOS associated with anterior cervical spine surgery.

Study Design: Retrospective national database analysis., Objective: Our goal was to estimate racial and ethnic differences in in-hospital complication and mortality rates associated with cervical spine surgery., Summary of Background Data: The impact of observed racial and ethnic disparities in orthopedic spine care use on morbidity and mortality is not well understood., Methods: On the basis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, there were 983,420 adult nontrauma hospital discharges from 2000 through 2009. In-hospital complications and mortality were the outcome variables. The primary independent variable was race/ethnicity (defined as non-Hispanic white [white], non-Hispanic black [black], and Hispanic). Covariates were age, sex, household income, insurance status, geographical location, hospital volume, and comorbidities. Multivariable regression models were used to determine the association between race/ethnicity and in-hospital complication and mortality. Significance was set at a P value less than 0.05., Results: The overall rates of an in-hospital complication or mortality were 4.09% and 0.42%, respectively. There were no differences in the rates of in-hospital complications or mortality between Hispanics and Caucasians. Compared with Caucasians, African Americans had higher odds of experiencing an in-hospital complication (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.48) and higher odds of dying during hospitalization (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.96)., Conclusion: Although there were no differences between Caucasians and Hispanics, African Americans had significantly higher rates of in-hospital complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery than did Caucasians. These differences persisted after adjusting for known risk factors for complications and mortality., Level of Evidence: 3.

Study Design: Prospective cohort study., Objective: To examine the relationship between improvement in pain intensity and subsequent improvement in physical function and disability during the first 12 months after lumbar spine surgery., Summary of Background Data: Little is known about how reduction of pain intensity after surgery may predict improvements in physical function and disability., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 260 individuals undergoing elective surgery for degenerative lumbar spine conditions from August 2005 through August 2011. Preoperative and postoperative (3, 6, and 12 mo) assessment tools were numeric pain rating scale, Short Form 12 version 2 physical component score (physical function), and Oswestry Disability Index (disability). Changes were defined using minimum clinically important differences. The association between improvement in pain intensity and subsequent improvement in physical function and disability during the first 12 postoperative months was assessed using standard regression methods. Significance was set at a P value less than 0.05., Results: Preoperatively, mean pain intensity was 5.2 (standard deviation, 2.4), physical function was 27.9 (standard deviation, 9.2), and disability was 40.1% (standard deviation, 16.8%). Pain intensity had improved in 164 (63.1%) patients by 3 and 6 months and in 184 (70.8%) by 12 months. Patients with improvement in pain postoperatively were more likely to have subsequent improvement in physical function (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.16) during the course of 12 postoperative months. The association between postoperative pain reduction and reduced disability was similar (odds ratio, 1.61; confidence interval, 1.12-2.33)., Conclusion: Most patients experienced clinically important postsurgical reductions in pain intensity by 3 months after surgery. Those patients were more likely to have clinically important improvement in physical function and reduction in disability during the first postoperative year., Level of Evidence: 1.

Background Context: The fear-avoidance model offers a promising framework for understanding the development of chronic postoperative pain and disability. However, limited research has examined this model in patients undergoing spinal surgery., Purpose: To determine whether preoperative and early postoperative fear of movement predicts pain, disability, and physical health at 6 months following spinal surgery for degenerative conditions, after controlling for depressive symptoms and other potential confounding variables., Study Design/setting: A prospective cohort study conducted at an academic outpatient clinic., Patient Sample: One hundred forty-one patients undergoing surgery for lumbar or cervical degenerative conditions., Outcome Measures: Self-reported pain and disability were measured with the Brief Pain Inventory and the Oswestry Disability Index/Neck Disability Index, respectively. The physical composite scale of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) measured physical health., Methods: Data collection occurred preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months following surgery. Fear of movement was measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and depression with the Prime-MD PHQ-9., Results: One hundred and twenty patients (85% follow-up) completed the 6-month postoperative assessment. Multivariable mixed-method linear regression analyses found that early postoperative fear of movement (6 weeks) predicted pain intensity, pain interference, disability, and physical health at 6-month follow-up (p<.05). Preoperative and early postoperative depression predicted pain interference, disability, and physical health., Conclusion: Results provide support for the fear-avoidance model in a postsurgical spine population. Early postoperative screening for fear of movement and depressive symptoms that do not acutely improve following surgical intervention appears warranted. Cognitive and behavioral strategies may be beneficial for postsurgical patients with high fear of movement and/or depressive symptoms., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Widespread use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) in cervical spine surgery has continued despite the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's 2008 notification regarding its adverse effects. Our study goals were to analyze how patient, surgical, and institutional factors influenced rhBMP use in cervical spinal fusion surgery and to examine the cervical-spine-specific in-hospital complications associated with rhBMP use., Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify 1,064,372 patients eighteen years or older who had undergone cervical spinal fusion surgery from 2003 through 2010. Of these patients, 84,726 (7.96%) received rhBMP. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze patient, surgical, and institutional factors associated with rhBMP use, and the relationship between rhBMP use and the development of in-hospital complications., Results: On multivariate analysis, patient age and sex, insurance type, surgical approach, use of autograft bone, and hospital teaching status, size, and region were significant predictors of rhBMP use. Use of rhBMP was a significant predictor of complications on univariate analysis and on multivariate analysis adjusted for patient age and sex, Charlson comorbidity score, insurance status, surgical approach, autograft bone use, and hospital teaching status, size, and region. Use of rhBMP was significantly associated with the development of dysphagia (prevalence, 2.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.53), dysphonia (prevalence, 0.28%; adjusted OR, 1.48), hematoma/seroma formation (prevalence, 0.7%; adjusted OR, 1.24), and neurological complications (prevalence, 0.84%; adjusted OR, 2.0). These complications were most commonly found after anterior cervical fusion surgery. Wound infections and neurological complications were most commonly found after posterior cervical fusion surgery. Dysphagia was most commonly found after circumferential fusion surgery., Conclusions: Indications for rhBMP use for cervical spinal fusion are multifactorial. Its use is associated with a significantly higher likelihood of cervical-spine-specific complications.

Study Design: Prospective survey., Objective: To determine the prevalence of use of presurgical psychological screening (PPS) among spine surgeons in the United States, identify factors associated with PPS use, evaluate surgeons' opinions of PPS, and investigate how PPS is applied in clinical practice., Summary of Background Data: The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends PPS for patients undergoing back surgery. The prevalence of PPS is unknown. Thus, it may be difficult to improve preoperative care for such patients with psychological conditions., Methods: An online survey invitation was emailed to 340 spine surgeons. Questions addressed surgeon characteristics (eg, number of years in practice), practice characteristics (eg, practice type), inclusion of integrated rehabilitation and psychological services, and use of PPS. The impact of psychological factors on rehabilitation and recovery was assessed using an 11-point Likert scale (0, no impact; 10, highest impact). We analyzed the 110 (32%) responses with a χ(2) test (significance, P<0.05)., Results: PPS was used by 37% (41) to screen for depression (100%) or anxiety (85%). PPS use was highest among surgeons with more experience, higher annual volume, and no university affiliation. Among those screening for fear avoidance, use was highest among surgeons more recently entering the field. Surgeons reported a strong belief regarding the impact of psychological factors on pain relief, adherence to therapy, and return to work (mean impact rating, >7.0); however, impact on return for follow-up was only moderate (mean rating, 5.8)., Conclusions: A minority of surgeons reported using PPS. Surgeons were less likely to use PPS if they had completed residency or begun practice within 14 years, had fewer than 200 cases annually, or were university affiliated. This study highlights the need to advocate for the use of North American Spine Society guidelines regarding the use of PPS.

Dysphonia and dysphagia are common complications of anterior cervical discectomy (ACD). We sought to determine the relationship between dysphagia and in-hospital mortality, complications, speech therapy/dysphagia training, length of hospitalization, and costs associated with ACD. Discharge data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1,649,871 patients who underwent ACD of fewer than four vertebrae for benign acquired disease between 2001 and 2010 were analyzed using cross-tabulations and multivariate regression modeling. Dysphagia was reported in 32,922 cases (2.0 %). Speech therapy/dysphagia training was reported in less than 0.1 % of all cases and in only 0.2 % of patients with dysphagia. Dysphagia was significantly associated with age ≥65 years (OR = 1.5 [95 % CI 1.4-1.7], P < 0.001), advanced comorbidity (OR = 2.3 [2.0-2.6], P < 0.001), revision surgery (OR = 2.7 [2.3-3.1], P < 0.001), disc prosthesis placement (OR = 1.5 [1.0-2.0], P = 0.029), and vocal cord paralysis (OR = 11.6 [8.3-16.1], P < 0.001). Dysphagia was a significant predictor of aspiration pneumonia (OR = 8.6 [6.7-10.9], P < 0.001), tracheostomy (OR = 2.3 [1.6-3.3], P < 0.001), gastrostomy (OR = 30.9 [25.3-37.8], P < 0.001), and speech therapy/dysphagia training (OR = 32.0 [15.4-66.4], P < 0.001). Aspiration pneumonia was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 15.9 [11.0-23.1], P < 0.001). Dysphagia, vocal cord paralysis, and aspiration pneumonia were significant predictors of increased length of hospitalization and hospital-related costs, with aspiration pneumonia having the single largest impact on length of hospitalization and costs. Dysphagia is significantly associated with increased morbidity, length of hospitalization, and hospital-related costs in ACD patients. Despite the known risk of dysphagia in ACD patients and an established role for the speech-language pathologist in dysphagia management, speech-language pathology intervention appears underutilized in this population.

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of Nationwide Inpatient Sample and US Census data., Objective: To (1) document national trends in surgical hospitalizations with the primary diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis from 2000 through 2009; and (2) evaluate how those trends relate to race and ethnicity., Summary of Background Data: In the United States, the rate of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery is increasing, and understanding how changing demographic trends impact hospitalization rates for this surgery is important., Methods: Multivariable regression models were used to determine associations between race and ethnicity and the rates of surgical hospitalization for lumbar spinal stenosis. All models were adjusted for age, sex, insurance, income status, geographical location, and comorbidities., Results: From 2000 through 2009, the overall surgical hospitalization rate increased by 30%. Surgical hospitalization rates for lumbar spinal stenosis in the United States varied substantially across racial and ethnic groups. In 2009, white, non-Hispanics had the highest rate (1.074 per 1000) compared with black, non-Hispanics (0.558 per 1000; P< 0.001), and Hispanics (0.339 per 1000; P< 0.001). The relative differences persisted across time., Conclusion: There were substantial differences in rates of surgical hospitalization among individuals of different racial and ethnic groups. Possible causes were (1) differences in clinical decision making among spine care providers with regard to offering surgical care to minority populations; (2) differences in access to care because of financial, educational, or geographical barriers; and (3) differences in attitudes toward surgical care among those of different racial and ethnic groups., Level of Evidence: 3.

In 2001, the Institute of Medicine issued a challenge to the American health care system to improve the quality of care by focusing on six major areas: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. The patient-centered model of care directly addresses important limits of surgical care of the lumbar spine, i.e., the lack of effective methods for increasing patient participation and engagement in post-operative follow-up. Recent evidence indicates that post-surgical outcomes are better among those with higher patient activation. We therefore developed an intervention based on the principles of motivational interviewing to increase patient activation: the Functional Recovery in Lumbar Spine Surgery Health Behavior Change Counseling (HBCC) intervention. The HBCC was designed to maximize post-operative engagement and participation in physical therapy and home exercise, to improve functional recovery, and to decrease pain in individuals undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery. From December 2009 through October 2012, 120 participants were recruited and divided into two groups: those receiving (intervention group, 60) and not receiving (control group, 60) the HBCC intervention. The current manuscript provides a detailed description of the theoretical framework and study design of the HBCC and describes the implementation of this health behavior intervention in a university-based spine service. The HBCC provides a model for conducting health behavioral research in a real-world setting., (© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although depressive symptoms are common among those living with back pain, there is limited information on the relationship between postsurgical pain reduction and changes in depressive symptoms. The objective of this prospective cohort study was to examine the change in pain and depressive symptoms and to characterize the relationship between pain and depressive symptoms after lumbar spine surgery. We assessed 260 individuals undergoing lumbar spine surgery preoperatively and postoperatively (3 and 6 months) using a pain intensity numeric rating scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale. The relationship between change in pain (a 2-point decrease or 30% reduction from the preoperative level) and depressive symptoms was examined using standard regression methods. Preoperatively, the mean pain intensity was 5.2 (SD 2.4) points, and the mean depressive symptom score was 5.03 (SD 2.44) points. At 3 months, individuals who experienced a reduction in pain (63%) were no more likely to experience a reduction in depressive symptoms (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] .58 to 1.98) than individuals who experienced no change from preoperative pain (34%). However, at 6 months, individuals who experienced a reduction in pain (63%) were nearly twice as likely to experience a reduction in depressive symptoms (odds ratio 1.93, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.25) as those who experienced no change or an increase in pain (31%). We found that most individuals experienced clinically important reductions in pain after surgery. We concluded that those whose pain level was reduced at 6 months were more likely to experience a reduction in depressive symptoms., (Copyright © 2012 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This article describes a rare congenital abnormality of anterior and posterior C1 fusion failure presenting after an acute athletic injury to the fibrous nonunion. C1 congenital malformations are rare, occurring in approximately 2% of patients; even rarer are combined anterior and posterior arch malformations in the same patient. Posterior ring abnormalities are more common than anterior ring injuries (4.5:1, respectively). To the authors' knowledge, combined anterior and posterior ring congenital malformations with subsequent injury have not been previously described. In the current patient, a congenital failure of fusion of the anterior and posterior arches of C1 was identified. The anterior fibrous nonunion was injured while the patient played football, leading to transient neurologic injury and dysphagia from soft tissue swelling. The patient was initially diagnosed with an acute fracture at another facility; however, given advanced imaging, flexion and extension views, and a normal neurologic examination, the authors diagnosed a traumatized congenital defect. The injury healed with a short period of cervical collar immobilization and supportive measures. Such malformations are usually found incidentally, but they can be symptomatic after trauma. Images to distinguish these deficits can be difficult because the differences between chronic nonunions and congenital malformations are subtle. Surgery is rarely indicated for congenital malformations because they are often stable even after injury; however, they may predispose patients to neurologic injury in the future with high-risk activities. Because the current patient had an increased chance of future injury secondary to the lack of bone formation in the C1 vertebrae, he was restricted from participating in contact sports., (Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.)

Study Design: Epidemiologic study using national administrative data., Objective: To compare anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for the treatment of cervical disc pathology in terms of (1) patient and hospital characteristics, length of stay, and total charges; and (2) temporal changes in those variables and in overall numbers., Summary of Background Data: Studies have shown that CDA has results and safety profiles comparable with those of ACDF, but information on patient and hospital characteristics and economical impact of CDA is lacking., Methods: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for all hospitalization records from 2005 through 2008 with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes corresponding to ACDF or CDA, used multivariable linear regression analyses (significance, P, 0.05) for patient and hospital characteristics, and calculated length of stay parameters. For total hospital charges, we used the consumer price index to convert all charges to 2008 US dollars., Results: Most of the 544,174 ACDF procedures occurred in the South; most of the 4,710 CDA procedures occurred in the West and South. Compared with patients undergoing ACDF, those undergoing CDA were younger (P, 0.001). Comorbid severity for ACDF increased over time (P, 0.001) but did not change for CDA (P = 0.664). Although hospital stay decreased for both groups, total hospital charges increased for ACDF but remained stable for CDA over time., Conclusion: Patients undergoing CDA tended to be younger and to have less comorbidity, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. The number of CDAs increased over time, although the percentage remained relatively small in comparison with that for ACDF.

Objective: To compare the factor structure of 6 short forms of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) by means of confirmatory factor analysis in patients after spinal surgery for degenerative conditions., Design: A cross-sectional survey study., Setting: University-based surgical clinic., Participants: Adults (N=137) treated by spinal surgery for a degenerative condition (ie, spinal stenosis, spondylosis with or without myelopathy, and spondylolisthesis)., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measure: Patients completed the TSK within 3 months of hospital discharge., Results: Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the 2-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11 had a reasonable fit for the data, with internal consistency values >.70. A 1-factor TSK-4 (items 3, 6, 7, and 11) demonstrated an excellent fit for the data, but an adequate internal consistency was not maintained. A poor fit was noted for the 1-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11, and a 4-item TSK (items 1, 2, 9, and 11)., Conclusions: The current study provides further evidence that specific short-form versions of the TSK may be useful for assessing fear of movement in surgical populations. Results support the measurement of fear of movement using the 2-factor, 13- and 11-item versions of the TSK in patients after spinal surgery. A TSK-4 (items 3, 6, 7, and 11) offers a promising alternative to the TSK-13 and TSK-11. However, further research is needed to test the validity and reliability of the TSK-4 in patients undergoing spinal surgery in order to support its use in a clinical environment. Researchers and clinicians interested in a shorter measure of fear of movement should consider using the TSK-11., (Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis of the Cervical Spine Research Society Outcomes Study, a longitudinal multicenter cohort study., Objective: To provide a statistical model for estimating health utility from the Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire (CSOQ) domain scores., Summary of Background Data: There is consensus among health-policy researchers that the results of economic evaluations of health can be reported in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). The CSOQ is a condition-specific instrument that assesses individuals across several domains, including neck and arm/shoulder pain and psychological distress., Methods: The CSOQ and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were prospectively administered before surgery (within 4 weeks) and after surgery (at 3, 6, and 24 months) to individuals undergoing anterior cervical decompression and fusion for degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. Using methods reported by Brazier et al, health utility (SF-6D) was estimated using the SF-36. Regression analyses were used on a training dataset (n = 164) to compute the SF-6D from the domain scores of the CSOQ. A validation dataset (n = 328) was used to estimate the SF-6D for comparison to the calculated health utility from the SF-36. RESULTS.: Domain scores were moderately correlated with health utility (SF-6D) (P < 0.001) with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.48 to 0.70. The regression equation to predict SF-6D on the basis of CSOQ domain scores and patient age using the training dataset accounted for 65% of the variation in health utility. In the validation dataset, predicted SF-6D was positively correlated with observed SF-6D (r = 0.680, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Our findings show that the CSOQ's domain scores can be used to estimate health-utility scores among those undergoing elective anterior cervical decompression and fusion for cervical degenerative disc disease. The ability to assess health utility, coupled with the psychometric properties of the CSOQ, should increase the clinical utility of this patient-reported outcomes instrument.

Background: Despite advances in surgical techniques, outcomes after spine surgery are highly variable. Recent research has highlighted the importance of individuals participating in, and taking responsibility for, their health and recovery. Patient activation, defined as an individual's propensity to engage in adaptive health behaviors leading to improved health outcomes, has been identified as a potentially important factor in this process. Our goal was to determine the association between preoperative patient activation and functional recovery after lumbar spine surgery., Methods: We prospectively followed sixty-five consecutive patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery from August 2005 through May 2006. Patient activation was assessed preoperatively as one of four stages. We assessed pain intensity, disability, and functional status preoperatively and postoperatively with use of a numeric rating scale for pain, the Oswestry Disability Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 (version 2). Comparisons were made for disability and functional status as a function of patient activation. Repeated-measures linear regression models were used to test the association between patient activation and functional recovery over time., Results: Preoperatively, we rated participant activation as low (Stage I, fifteen patients), high (Stage IV, sixteen patients), and intermediate (Stage II, twelve patients; Stage III, twenty-two patients; total, thirty-four patients). Overall, pain and disability decreased after surgery (p < 0.05). Stage-IV participants experienced a greater degree of decrease in pain (p = 0.049) and disability (p = 0.035) than did Stage-I participants. Overall, physical and mental health improved after surgery (p < 0.05), but only physical health differed according to patient activation, with a significantly smaller improvement in Stage-I participants than in Stage-IV participants (p = 0.044)., Conclusions: High patient activation was associated with better recovery after surgery. Increased patient activation may lead to improved functional recovery through increased physical therapy adherence after spine surgery in adults.

Study Design: Prospective cohort study., Objective: To examine differences between preoperative and postoperative fear of movement and investigate the relationship between fear of movement and pain, disability and physical health after spinal surgery for degenerative conditions., Summary of Background Data: Consistent evidence supports the relationship between fear of movement and higher levels of pain and disability in various chronic pain populations. Fear of movement among patients undergoing spinal surgery for chronic pain has received little attention in the literature., Methods: Participants were 141 patients treated with surgery for lumbar and cervical degenerative conditions. Assessments were conducted before surgery and 6 weeks and 3 months after hospitalization. Fear of movement was measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and outcomes were measured with the Brief Pain Inventory, Oswestry or Neck Disability Index, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)., Results: Follow-up rates were 91% and 87% for 6 weeks and 3 months, respectively. Fear of movement beliefs improved after surgery, but 49% of patients continued to have high fear of movement at 6-week follow-up and 39% at 3-month follow-up. Patients with higher levels of fear of movement had poorer postoperative outcomes. Multilevel linear regression analyses found that postoperative fear of movement was independently associated with postoperative pain intensity, pain interference, disability, and physical health (P < 0.001), after controlling for depression, age, sex, education, race, comorbidities, type and area of surgery, prior surgeries, and baseline outcome score. Preoperative fear of movement was not predictive of poorer surgical outcomes., Conclusion: Results demonstrate that postoperative but not preoperative fear of movement beliefs explain unique and significant variance in postoperative pain, disability, and physical health. Clinicians interested in improving surgical outcomes should address postoperative fear of movement along with other traditional clinical and medical risk factors. Recommendations include postoperative screening for high fear of movement beliefs and incorporating cognitive-behavioral techniques into postoperative rehabilitation for at-risk surgical spine patients.

Study Design: Systematic review., Objective: To determine the incidence and prevalence and identify effective recommendations to minimize the incidence and prevalence of postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery., Summary of Background Data: The reported incidence and prevalence of postoperative dysphagia and risk factors associated with its development varies widely in the literature., Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken for articles published between January 1990 and December 2008. Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify published studies examining the incidence and prevalence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. Two independent reviewers assessed the strength of literature using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, assessing quality, quantity, and consistency of results. Disagreements were resolved by consensus., Results: A total of 126 articles were initially screened, and 17 ultimately met the predetermined inclusion criteria. The rates of dysphagia found in the literature varied widely. Rates declined after surgery, but plateau at 1 year at a range of 13% to 21%. Risk factors identified were multilevel surgery and female sex. Specific preventive measures were not identified., Conclusion: A better understanding of dysphagia will require the development of better outcome measures.

Background: An individual's propensity to engage in adaptive health and rehabilitation behaviors may account for variation in postsurgical outcome., Purpose: To determine the psychometric properties and construct validity of the recently developed Patient Activation Measure (PAM) (previously unused in spine research) in persons undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery., Methods: We prospectively used the PAM to assess activation in 283 patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery. Reliability statistics were computed using repeated assessment (baseline and 1-week follow-up) before surgery. Additional psychological attributes were assessed at baseline and correlated with patient activation. Factor analysis was used to confirm the theoretical structure of patient activation., Results: Repeat PAM administrations had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85. The PAM showed positive correlation with optimism (r = 0.75), hope (r = 0.73), self-efficacy (r = 0.65), and internal locus of control (r = 0.65) but no correlation with comorbidity (r = 0.01). Confirmatory factor analysis of the PAM items indicated reasonable fit between observed data and a three-factor patient activation model., Conclusions: The PAM is a reliable, valid measure of patient activation for individuals undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery and may have clinical utility in identifying those at risk for poor engagement in postsurgical rehabilitation.

Background: Variation in referral rates for physical therapy exists at both the individual physician and practice levels., Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of physician and practice characteristics on referral for physical therapy in patients with traumatic lower-extremity injury., Design: A cross-sectional survey was conducted., Methods: In 2007, a Web-based survey questionnaire was distributed to 474 surgeon members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. The questionnaire measured physician and practice characteristics, outcome expectations, and attitude toward physical therapy. Referral for physical therapy was based on case vignettes., Results: The response rate was 58%. Surgeons reported that 57.6% of their patients would have a positive outcome from physical therapy and 24.2% would have a negative outcome. The highest physical therapy expectations were for the appropriate use of assistive devices (80.7%) and improved strength (force-generating capacity) (76.4%). The lowest outcome expectations were for improvements in pain (35.9%), coping with the emotional aspects of disability (44.1%), and improvements in workplace limitations (51.4%). Physicians reported that 32.6% of their patients referred for physical therapy would have no improvement beyond what would occur with a surgeon-directed home exercise program. Multivariate analyses showed positive physician outcome expectations to have the largest effect on referral for physical therapy (odds ratio=2.7, P<.001)., Conclusions: The results suggest that orthopedic trauma surgeons refer patients for physical therapy based mostly on expectations for physical and motor outcomes, but may not be considering pain relief, return to work, and psychosocial aspects of recovery. Furthermore, low referral rates may be attributed to a preference for surgeon-directed home-based rehabilitation. Future research should consider the efficacy of physical therapy for pain, psychosocial and occupational outcomes, and exploring the differences between supervised physical therapy and physician-directed home exercise programs.

Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study., Objective: To determine the role of race, insurance status, and geographic location on US anterior cervical spine surgery rates and in-hospital mortality between 1992 and 2005., Summary of Background Data: Previous investigation indicates that anterior cervical spine surgery has been increasingly used in the management of degenerative cervical spine disease throughout the 1990s. Significant predictors of health outcomes, including race, ethnicity, geography, and insurance coverage have yet to be investigated in detail for these procedures., Methods: Cases of anterior cervical spine surgery were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The US population counts were taken from the Current Population Survey. Multivariate regression models were employed to describe national rates of anterior cervical spine surgery and model the odds of death among admissions for anterior cervical spine surgery. All models incorporated adjustment for hospital sample clustering, age, and comorbidity status., Results: Based on an analysis of a total 100,286,482 hospital discharge records, an estimated 965,600 anterior cervical spine procedures were performed between 1992 and 2005 in the United States. During this period, rates of surgery increased by 289%. Though adjusted rates of surgery were lowest among minority populations, disparities decreased with time. The mean age of patients, as well as the average preoperative comorbidity status, increased with time. The odds of mortality did not significantly increase between 1992 and 2005. Odds of in-hospital death were greatest in among black patients (P < 0.001) and lowest in Southern states (P < 0.001) and patients with private insurance (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: With the recent rise of anterior cervical spine procedures in the United States, substantial variation in the delivery of surgical care exists along a number of demographic factors. A detailed investigation of variation in surgical decision-making algorithms among spine specialists, as well as a determination of differences among patient populations in attitudes toward surgery, may help elucidate the trends observed in this study.