Search

Background and Aims Accelerated atrial pacing offers potential benefits for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), compared with standard lower-rate pacing. The study investigates the relationship between atrial pacing rate and left-heart filling pressure. Methods Seventy-five consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF underwent assessment of mean left atrial pressure (mLAP) and atrioventricular (AV) conduction delay (PR interval) in sinus rhythm and accelerated atrial pacing with 10 bpm increments up to Wenckebach block. Computer simulations (CircAdapt) of a virtual HFpEF cohort complemented clinical observations and hypothesized the modulating effects of AV coupling and atrial (dys)function. Results In the study cohort, 49(65%) patients had a high HFpEF likelihood (H2FPEF ≥ 5.0), and 28(37%) an elevated mLAP ≥ 15 mmHg at sinus rhythm. Optimal pacing rates of 100 [70–110]bpm (median [IQR]) significantly reduced mLAP from 12.8 [10.0–17.4]mmHg in sinus rhythm (55 [52–61]bpm) to 10.4 [7.8–14.8]mmHg (P <.001). Conversely, higher pacing rates (130 [110–140]bpm) significantly increased mLAP to 14.7 [11.0–17.8]mmHg (P <.05). PR interval and, hence, AV conduction delay prolonged incrementally with increasing pacing rates. Simulations corroborated these clinical findings, showing mLAP reduction at a moderately increased pacing rate and a subsequent increase at higher rates. Moreover, simulations suggested that mLAP reduction is optimized when AV conduction delay shortens with increasing rate. Conclusions Accelerated pacing acutely reduces left-heart filling pressure in patients undergoing AF catheter ablation and computer simulations with HFpEF features, suggesting it as a potential therapeutic strategy to alleviate congestion symptoms. Virtual HFpEF patient cohorts hypothesize that AV sequential pacing may further optimize this therapy's beneficial effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) comprises pacing at the left ventricular septum (LVSP) or left bundle branch (LBBP). The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences in ventricular electrical heterogeneity between LVSP, LBBP, right ventricular pacing (RVP) and intrinsic conduction with different dyssynchrony measures using the ECG, vectorcardiograpy, ECG belt, and Ultrahigh frequency (UHF‐)ECG. Methods: Thirty‐seven patients with a pacemaker indication for bradycardia or cardiac resynchronization therapy underwent LBBAP implantation. ECG, vectorcardiogram, ECG belt and UHF‐ECG signals were recorded during RVP, LVSP and LBBP, and intrinsic activation. QRS duration (QRSd) was measured from the ECG, QRS area was calculated from the vectorcardiogram, LV activation time (LVAT) and standard deviation of activation time (SDAT) from ECG belt and electrical dyssynchrony (e‐DYS16) from UHF‐ECG. Results: Both LVSP and LBBP significantly reduced ventricular electrical heterogeneity as compared to underlying LBBB and RV pacing in terms of QRS area (p <.001), SDAT (p <.001), LVAT (p <.001) and e‐DYS16 (p <.001). QRSd was only reduced as compared to RV pacing(p <.001). QRS area was similar during LBBP and normal intrinsic conduction, e‐DYS16 was similar during LVSP and normal intrinsic conduction, whereas SDAT was similar for LVSP, LBBP and normal intrinsic conduction. For all these variables there was no significant difference between LVSP and LBBP. Conclusion: Both LVSP and LBBP resulted in a more synchronous LV activation than LBBB and RVP. Especially LBBP resulted in levels of LV synchrony comparable to normal intrinsic conduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been introduced as an alternative to biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Several studies describe echocardiographic reverse remodelling after LBBAP. Reverse electrical remodelling after LBBAP has not yet been described. Case summary A 77-year-old female with non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 30–35%], left bundle branch block (QRS duration 164 ms), and symptomatic atrial fibrillation irresponsive to pharmacological therapy was evaluated for CRT with LBBAP and atrioventricular node ablation. Successful LBBAP implantation resulted in confirmed left bundle branch capture. Immediately after implantation, paced QRS duration was 194 ms with a long stimulus-V6RWPT (time to peak R wave in V6) of 93 ms, suggesting distal conduction system disease. Patient showed an echocardiographic improvement (LVEF 35–50%) and improvement in symptoms (NYHA class III to NYHA class II) at 1-year follow-up. Moreover, an improvement in conduction delays was found present. Paced QRS duration improved to 159 ms and stimulus-V6RWPT improved to 78 ms. This improvement might be due to reverse electrical remodelling. Discussion This case demonstrates that LBBAP can induce reverse electrical remodelling, even in the presence of distal conduction system disease. With the current availability of different pacing strategies in CRT (i.e. biventricular CRT, LBBAP, and left bundle branch-optimized CRT), more research on patient selection and pacing strategy selection is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Implantation of a permanent pacemaker and atrioventricular (AV) node ablation (pace-and-ablate) is an established approach for rate and symptom control in elderly patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a physiological pacing strategy that might overcome right ventricular pacing-induced dyssynchrony. In this study, the feasibility and safety of performing LBBAP and AV node ablation in a single procedure in the elderly was investigated. Methods: Consecutive patients with symptomatic AF referred for pace-and-ablate underwent the treatment in a single procedure. Data on procedure-related complications and lead stability were collected at regular follow-up at one day, ten days and six weeks after the procedure and continued every six months thereafter. Results: 25 patients (mean age 79.2 ± 4.2 years) were included and underwent successful LBBAP. In 22 (88%) patients, AV node ablation and LBBAP were performed in the same procedure. AV node ablation was postponed in two patients due to lead-stability concerns and in one patient on their own request. No complications related to the single-procedure approach were observed with no lead-stability issues at follow-up. Conclusions: LBBAP combined with AV node ablation in a single procedure is feasible and safe in elderly patients with symptomatic AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Insulin resistance (IR) in adolescence is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM]. The PREVIEW (Prevention of Diabetes Through Lifestyle Intervention and Population Studies in Europe and Around the World) study assessed the effectiveness of a high‐protein, low‐glycaemic‐index diet and a moderate‐protein, moderate‐glycaemic‐index diet to decrease IR in insulin‐resistant children who were overweight or obese. Inclusion criteria were age 10 to 17 years, homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA‐IR) ≥2.0 and overweight/obesity. In 126 children (mean ± SD age 13.6 ± 2.2 years, body mass index [BMI] z‐score 3.04 ± 0.66, HOMA‐IR 3.48 ± 2.28) anthropometrics, fat mass percentage (FM%), metabolic characteristics, physical activity, food intake and sleep were measured. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. IR was higher in pubertal children with morbid obesity than in prepubertal children with morbid obesity (5.41 ± 1.86 vs 3.23 ± 1.86; P = .007) and prepubertal and pubertal children with overweight/obesity (vs 3.61 ± 1.60, P = .004, and vs 3.40 ± 1.50, P < .001, respectively). IR was associated with sex, Tanner stage, BMI z‐score and FM%. Fasting glucose concentrations were negatively associated with Baecke sport score (r = −0.223, P = .025) and positively with daytime sleepiness (r = 0.280, P = .016) independent of sex, Tanner stage, BMI z‐score and FM%. In conclusion, IR was most severe in pubertal children with morbid obesity. The associations between fasting glucose concentration and Baecke sport score and sleepiness suggest these might be possible targets for diabetes prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Accelerated atrial pacing offers potential benefits for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), compared with standard lower-rate pacing. The study investigates the relationship between atrial pacing rate and left-heart filling pressure., Methods: Seventy-five consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF underwent assessment of mean left atrial pressure (mLAP) and atrioventricular (AV) conduction delay (PR interval) in sinus rhythm and accelerated atrial pacing with 10 bpm increments up to Wenckebach block. Computer simulations (CircAdapt) of a virtual HFpEF cohort complemented clinical observations and hypothesized the modulating effects of AV coupling and atrial (dys)function., Results: In the study cohort, 49(65%) patients had a high HFpEF likelihood (H2FPEF ≥ 5.0), and 28(37%) an elevated mLAP ≥ 15 mmHg at sinus rhythm. Optimal pacing rates of 100 [70-110]bpm (median [IQR]) significantly reduced mLAP from 12.8 [10.0-17.4]mmHg in sinus rhythm (55 [52-61]bpm) to 10.4 [7.8-14.8]mmHg (P < .001). Conversely, higher pacing rates (130 [110-140]bpm) significantly increased mLAP to 14.7 [11.0-17.8]mmHg (P < .05). PR interval and, hence, AV conduction delay prolonged incrementally with increasing pacing rates. Simulations corroborated these clinical findings, showing mLAP reduction at a moderately increased pacing rate and a subsequent increase at higher rates. Moreover, simulations suggested that mLAP reduction is optimized when AV conduction delay shortens with increasing rate., Conclusions: Accelerated pacing acutely reduces left-heart filling pressure in patients undergoing AF catheter ablation and computer simulations with HFpEF features, suggesting it as a potential therapeutic strategy to alleviate congestion symptoms. Virtual HFpEF patient cohorts hypothesize that AV sequential pacing may further optimize this therapy's beneficial effects., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared.

Background: Pubertal insulin resistance (IR) is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus development in adolescents with overweight/obesity., Objectives: The PREVIEW study was a randomized parallel trial assessing the change in IR, analyzed by Homeostatic Model Assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), at 2 years after randomization to a high protein vs a moderate protein diet in adolescents with overweight/obesity. It was hypothesized that a high protein/low glycaemic index diet would be superior in reducing IR compared to a medium protein/medium GI diet, in insulin resistant adolescents with overweight or obesity., Methods: Adolescents with overweight/obesity and IR from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Spain were randomized into a moderate protein/moderate GI (15/55/30En% protein/carbohydrate/fat, GI ≥ 56) or high protein/low GI (25/45/30En% protein/carbohydrate/fat, GI < 50) diet. Anthropometric and cardiometabolic parameters, puberty, dietary intake and physical activity (PA) were measured and effects on HOMA-IR were analyzed., Results: 126 adolescents were included in this study (13.6 ± 2.2 years, BMI z-score 3.04 ± 0.66, HOMA-IR 3.48 ± 2.28, HP n = 68, MP n = 58). At 2 years, changes in protein intake were not significantly different between timepoints or intervention groups and no effects of the intervention on IR were observed. The retention rate was 39%, while no compliance to the diets was observed., Conclusions: The PREVIEW study observed no effect of a high protein/low GI diet on IR in adolescents with overweight/obesity and IR because of lack of feasibility, due to insufficient retention and dietary compliance after 2 years., (© 2020 The Authors. Pediatric Obesity published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.)