Search

Matthew B Schabath,1,2 Tapashi B Dalvi,3 Hongyue A Dai,4 Alan L Crim,4 Anita Midha,5 Norah Shire,3 Nicholas T Gimbrone,1 Jill Walker,6 Danielle M Greenawalt,7 David Lawrence,8 James R Rigas,9 Robert Brody,9 Danielle Potter,9 Naveen S Kumar,4 Shane A Huntsman,4 Jhanelle E Gray2 1Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; 2Department of Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; 3Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 4M2Gen, Tampa, FL, USA; 5Department of Personalised Healthcare and Biomarkers, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 6Department of Precision Medicine Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 7Department of iMED Oncology Informatics, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, USA; 8Department of Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK; 9Department of Global Medical Affairs Oncology, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USACorrespondence: Matthew B SchabathH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USATel +1 813 745 4150Fax +1 813 745 6525Email matthew.schabath@moffitt.orgPurpose: To characterize programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in relation to survival and gene mutation status in patients with advanced NSCLC. The study also explored the influence of tumor mutational burden (TMB) on PD-L1 expression and patient characteristics.Patients and methods: Adult patients with histologically or cytologically documented Stage IIIB/Stage IV/recurrent/progressive NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 3, and >2 lines of prior systemic treatment regimens were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were treated from 1997 to 2015 at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, or at 7 community centers across the United States. PD-L1 expression level was determined using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay. EGFR and KRAS mutation status and ALK rearrangements were determined by targeted DNA sequencing; these were obtained from clinical records where targeted DNA sequencing was not performed. TMB was calculated as the total number of somatic mutations per sample.Results: From a total of 136 patients included in the study, 23.5% had tumors with high PD-L1 expression (≥25%). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with high PD-L1 expression (median OS: 39.5 months; median PFS: 15.8 months) vs low PD-L1 expression (

Aim: Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible, oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We report real-world effectiveness and safety data. Patients & methods: EGFR T790M positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer adults, who received ≥1 prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, received osimertinib 80 mg daily. Primary effectiveness outcome: overall survival. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included: investigator-assessed clinical response, progression-free survival, time-to-treatment discontinuation. Results: At data cutoff, 3015 patients had enrolled: 57.1% had investigator-assessed response (95% CI: 55.2-58.9). Median progression-free survival: 11.1 months (95% CI: 11.0-12.0) and median time-to-treatment discontinuation: 13.5 months (95% CI: 12.6-13.9). Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis-like events reported in 28 (1%) patients. Conclusion: Osimertinib demonstrated clinical effectiveness similar to efficacy observed in the clinical trial program with no new safety signals.

Purpose: With an increase in biomarker-directed therapies, tissue biopsy to identify targetable genomic and immunologic alterations has become the mainstay of managing patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, little is known about the associated economic impact and complication rate. This study assesses the frequency, complications, and costs of diagnostic and postprogression biopsy., Methods: This retrospective, observational study was conducted using administrative claims data from more than 30 million commercially insured individuals in the United States (2006 to 2014). Data were analyzed for the overall population and by time of biopsy (diagnostic or postprogression biopsy)., Results: Of 20,013 eligible patients, 13,411 (67%) received a diagnostic biopsy, whereas only 2,056 (10%) received a postprogression biopsy (mean cost, $9,977 and $16,806, respectively). Complication rates were similar at diagnosis and after progression, on the day of biopsy (10% v 7%, respectively) and within 30 days (63% v 61%, respectively). Mean costs were higher among patients with a complication compared with those without a complication on the day of biopsy (diagnostic biopsy, $12,030 v $6,508, respectively; postprogression biopsy, $22,593 v $7,812, respectively), within 7 days of biopsy (diagnostic biopsy, $13,657 v $7,765, respectively; postprogression biopsy, $23,969 v $8,932, respectively), and within 30 days of biopsy (diagnostic biopsy, $24,968 v $15,988, respectively; postprogression biopsy, $30,293 v $12,494, respectively; P < .001 for all comparisons)., Conclusion: From 2006 to 2014, postprogression biopsies were not common practice in NSCLC. Complication rates were similar at diagnosis and after progression, with mean costs higher among patients with a complication than those without a complication. With increasing demands for effective novel targeted therapies and safe testing methods, these data may be valuable in determining the budget impact and comparing complication rates with newer, less invasive molecular testing methods, including plasma circulating tumor DNA testing.

Background: Rexinoids demonstrate anti-proliferative differentiation-inducing activity in multiple cancer types, including NSCLC. Prior studies have shown promising results when combining rexinoids with chemotherapy. This phase I/II study evaluates the tolerability and activity of a rexinoid, bexarotene, combined with weekly paclitaxel and monthly carboplatin., Methods: Patients with confirmed advanced stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and adequate organ function were enrolled. They were scheduled to receive carboplatin (AUC =6) and 3 doses of weekly paclitaxel (100 mg/m 2 ) every 4 weeks. Oral bexarotene was administered daily at two doses: 300 and 400 mg/m 2 /day., Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Fourteen received 300 mg/m 2 /day and 19 received 400 mg/m 2 /day of bexarotene. Hematologic toxicity included grade 3 neutropenia in 7 patients. Hyperlipidemia was a major non-hematologic toxicity which was medically managed. The recommended phase II dose of bexarotene was 400 mg/m 2 /day. Response rate was 35%. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 8.3 months with 1-year survival of 43%. Median OS for the 300 mg/m 2 dose of bexarotene was 6.6 versus 9.8 months for the 400 mg/m 2 dose (HR, 0.73; Log rank P=0.37). Patients who experienced hypertriglyceridemia had a median OS of 9.8 months compared to 4.9 months for those who did not (HR, 0.69; Log rank P=0.33)., Conclusions: The 43% 1-year survival for patients receiving bexarotene with weekly paclitaxel and monthly carboplatin is encouraging. With the availability of new classes of agents for lung cancer, further evaluation of this regimen in unselected patients is not warranted. Our study confirms prior subgroup analyses showing a significant correlation between bexarotene-induced hypertriglyceridemia and survival. Further research is needed to identify molecular biomarkers to identify this subset of patients and to explore rexinoids in other combinations, especially with immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: KH Dragnev and JR Rigas received funding from Ligand Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this study. Ligand Pharmaceuticals had no role in the data collection, analysis, interpretation or composition of the manuscript. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: BRAF mutations act as an oncogenic driver via the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BRAF inhibition has shown antitumour activity in patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutant NSCLC. Dual MAPK pathway inhibition with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E)-mutant NSCLC might improve efficacy over BRAF inhibitor monotherapy based on observations in BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma. We aimed to assess the antitumour activity and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutant NSCLC., Methods: In this phase 2, multicentre, non-randomised, open-label study, we enrolled adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with pretreated metastatic stage IV BRAF(V600E)-mutant NSCLC who had documented tumour progression after at least one previous platinum-based chemotherapy and had had no more than three previous systemic anticancer therapies. Patients with previous BRAF or MEK inhibitor treatment were ineligible. Patients with brain metastases were allowed to enrol only if the lesions were asymptomatic, untreated (or stable more than 3 weeks after local therapy if treated), and measured less than 1 cm. Enrolled patients received oral dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus oral trametinib (2 mg once daily) in continuous 21-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response, which was assessed by intention to treat in the protocol-defined population (patients who received second-line or later treatment); safety was also assessed in this population and was assessed at least once every 3 weeks, with adverse events, laboratory values, and vital signs graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The study is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01336634., Findings: Between Dec 20, 2013, and Jan 14, 2015, 59 patients from 30 centres in nine countries across North America, Europe, and Asia met eligibility criteria. Two patients who had previously been untreated due to protocol deviation were excluded; thus, 57 eligible patients were enrolled. 36 patients (63·2% [95% CI 49·3-75·6]) achieved an investigator-assessed overall response. Serious adverse events were reported in 32 (56%) of 57 patients and included pyrexia in nine (16%), anaemia in three (5%), confusional state in two (4%), decreased appetite in two (4%), haemoptysis in two (4%), hypercalcaemia in two (4%), nausea in two (4%), and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in two (4%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia in five patients (9%), hyponatraemia in four (7%), and anaemia in three (5%). Four patients died during the study from fatal adverse events judged to be unrelated to treatment (one retroperitoneal haemorrhage, one subarachnoid haemorrhage, one respiratory distress, and one from disease progression that was more severe than typical progression, as assessed by the investigator)., Interpretation: Dabrafenib plus trametinib could represent a new targeted therapy with robust antitumour activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutant NSCLC., Funding: GlaxoSmithKline., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DP acts as an advisor for AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi and has received research funding from Novartis unrelated to the current trial. BB’s institution received a grant from Novartis for this study. HJMG’s institution has received payments from Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche. P-JS has been involved in clinical trials for GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis. EQ has received personal fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche, has received grants from Amgen, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, and Roche, and has received non-financial support from Boehringer. CSB’s institution received a grant for this study from Novartis and CSB has received personal fees from Novartis. FB has received personal fees from Novartis. SN has received personal fees from Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche. AU, PZ, AD’A, and BM are currently employees of Novartis. AD’A and BM were employees of GlaxoSmithKline during a portion of the study. AD’A and BM own stock in GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis and BM owns stock in Incyte and AstraZeneca. BEJ has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Clovis, Genentech, KEW Group, Merck, and Novartis, and shares of post-market revenue for an EGFR genotyping patent. The other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment options for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases are limited. Patupilone (EPO906), a blood-brain barrier-penetrating, microtubule-targeting, cytotoxic agent, has shown clinical activity in phase 1/2 studies in patients with NSCLC. This study evaluates the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of patupilone in NSCLC brain metastases., Methods: Adult patients with NSCLC and confirmed progressive brain metastases received patupilone intravenously at 10 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint of this multinomial 2-stage study combined early progression (EP; death or progression within 3 weeks) and progression-free survival at 9 weeks (PFS9w) to determine drug activity., Results: Fifty patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 33-74 years) were enrolled; the majority were men (58%), and most had received prior therapy for brain metastases (98%). The PFS9w rate was 36%, and the EP rate was 26%. Patupilone blood pharmacokinetic analyses showed mean areas under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 504 hours for cycles 1 and 3 of 1544 and 1978 ng h/mL, respectively, and a mean steady state distribution volume of 755 L/m(2) . Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), regardless of their relation with the study drug, included diarrhea (24%), pulmonary embolisms (8%), convulsions (4%), and peripheral neuropathy (4%). All patients discontinued the study drug: 31 (62%) for disease progression and 13 (26%) for AEs. Twenty-five of 32 deaths were due to brain metastases. The median time to progression and the overall survival were 3.2 and 8.8 months, respectively., Conclusions: This is the first prospective study of chemotherapy for recurrent brain metastases from NSCLC. In this population, patupilone demonstrated activity in heavily treated patients., (© 2015 American Cancer Society.)

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ziv-aflibercept in combination with cisplatin and pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: This single arm, multicentre phase II trial enrolled patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. Patients received intravenous ziv-aflibercept 6 mg kg(-1), pemetrexed 500 mg m(-2), and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2), every 21 days for up to six cycles. Maintenance administration of ziv-aflibercept was to continue until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or other cause for withdrawal. The co-primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Planned sample size was 72 patients., Results: The study was closed prematurely because of three confirmed and two suspected cases of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS). A total of 42 patients were enrolled. Median age was 61.5 years; 55% were male, 86% Caucasian and 50% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS)=0. A median of four cycles of ziv-aflibercept was administered. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were nausea (69%) and fatigue (67%), with hypertension (36%) as the most common grade 3/4 TEAE. Of the 38 evaluable patients, ORR was 26% and median PFS was 5 months., Conclusion: Cases of RPLS had been observed in other studies in the ziv-aflibercept clinical development programme but the rate observed in this study was higher than previously observed. This might be related to declining renal function and/or hypertension. Although ORR and PFS were in accordance with most historical first-line NSCLC studies, this combination of ziv-aflibercept/cisplatin/pemetrexed will not be further explored in NSCLC.

Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway has been implicated in tumorigenesis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most common type of lung cancer. As a result, EGFR has become a key focus for the development of personalized therapy, with several molecular biomarkers having been investigated as potential predictors of response with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in NSCLC (e.g., EGFR expression, EGFR gene copy gain, and EGFR mutations). Of these, activating mutations in EGFR have thus far given the most consistent results based on the available evidence from preclinical studies and clinical trials. In an attempt to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment with EGFR TKIs, EGFR mutation testing is being increasingly utilized in clinical practice. Currently in the United States, no EGFR TKI or accompanying mutational test is approved for the identification and first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, the first-generation EGFR TKIs, erlotinib and gefitinib, as well as investigational ErbB family TKIs and EGFR mutation testing methods are being evaluated in this setting. This review will discuss EGFR mutation testing as a biomarker of response to EGFR TKIs and the evolution of EGFR mutational analysis in NSCLC. Completed and ongoing clinical trials evaluating currently available or investigational EGFR TKIs as first-line therapy in molecularly and clinically selected patients with NSCLC, with a focus on trials in patients whose tumors have EGFR mutations, will also be reviewed., (Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Within the molecular scope of NCSLC, a complex landscape of dysregulated cellular signaling has emerged, defined largely by mutations in select mediators of signal transduction, including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma (ALK) kinases. Consequently, these mutant kinases become constitutively activated and targets for chemotherapeutic intervention. Encouragingly, small molecule inhibitors of these pathways have shown promise in clinical trials or are approved for clinical use. However, many protein kinases are dysregulated in NSCLC without genetic mutations. To quantify differences in tumor cell signaling that are transparent to genomic methods, we established a super-SILAC internal standard derived from NSCLC cell lines grown in vitro and labeled with heavy lysine and arginine, and deployed them in a phosphoproteomic workflow. We identified 9019 and 8753 phosphorylation sites in two separate tumors. Relative quantification of phosphopeptide abundance between tumor samples allowed for the determination of specific hubs and pathways differing between each tumor. Sites downstream of Ras showed decreased inhibitory phosphorylation (Raf/Mek) and increased activating phosphorylation (Erk1/2) in one tumor versus another. In this way, we were able to quantitatively access oncogenic kinase signaling in primary human tumors., Biological Significance: Through the use of quantitative proteomics, we demonstrated the feasibility and coverage that large scale mass spectrometry can leverage for understanding kinase networks in cancer. By incorporating Super-SILAC based quantitation into a typical pathology workflow, we were able to access and compare tumors from multiple patients in this analysis with high accuracy and dynamic range. We analyzed tumors from patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and were able to detect comprehensive phosphorylation networks relaying through known hubs of oncogenesis in lung cancer. We hereby show that it is possible to track changes to phosphorylation networks across multiple tumors, opening up the possibility that drug susceptibility and patient-specific stratification can be implemented downstream of classical pathology., (© 2013.)

Background: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of docetaxel/carboplatin regimen in the post-operative setting of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Enrolment of 133 patients with stage Ib - IIIa NSCLC was undertaken in an open-label, single arm study to assess the safety and tolerability of docetaxel (75 mg/kg) and carboplatin (AUC 5.5) administered for 3 cycles after resection for curative intent. The primary endpoint of the study was safety, as reflected by a febrile neutropenia rate of <10%. Other endpoints assessed protocol compliance and the impact of minimally invasive surgical technique., Results: Patient accrual was completed at 1 center in the US and 10 centers in China in <6 months. Febrile neutropenia complicated treatment in 12 patients (9.0%), below the predetermined safety threshold of 14 patients. Four VATS and 8 open thoracotomy patients experienced febrile neutropenia (P=0.26). Completion of the three-cycle adjuvant regimen was achieved in 86% (95% CI, 77-95%) of patients. Sixty-two of 66 VATS patients compared to 53 of 67 open thoracotomy patients received all three doses according to protocol (P<0.01). Thirteen serious adverse events (9.8%) and no deaths were attributed to the study regimen., Conclusions: In this rapidly accrued study, docetaxel and carboplatin were well-tolerated in the adjuvant treatment of NSCLC. Adjuvant treatment compliance was higher among patients undergoing a minimally invasive surgical approach. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00883675).

Background: Regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) are known to have host-immune dampening effects in many tumors and to be associated with increased tumor recurrence. Pharmacologic therapies have been developed to target these cells and hence strengthen the host's immune system. The FoxP3 gene is a marker of Tregs and can be visualized with immunohistochemistry (IHC). We investigated the presence and pattern of Tregs in non-small-cell lung tumors to determine possible therapeutic targets in lung cancer., Methods: We selected archival samples of primary lung carcinoma and benign inflamed lung from 32 surgical resections. We created a tissue array containing duplicate cores from the N1 and N2 nodal stations from 16 of the cases along with paired benign lung and tumor. We used whole-slide analysis for the other 16 cases. We used FoxP3 IHC to visualize Tregs in all lymphoid tissue present and to assess the quantity and pattern within the tissues., Results: All lymphoid tissue contains Tregs, but adenocarcinoma had significantly higher levels than both inflammatory lung controls and squamous carcinomas (p ≤ 0.008). Benign N1 lymph nodes (from patients with lung cancer) showed higher numbers of Tregs for adenocarcinoma versus squamous carcinoma., Conclusions: These findings reveal that Tregs are present in all lung tissues examined, but with significant enrichment in adenocarcinoma. This may lead to a more permissive microenvironment for adenocarcinoma and may explain aggressive patterns of tumor spread for this histology. Lung cancer patients with adenocarcinoma histology may benefit most from Treg-targeted therapy.

Purpose: This dose-escalation study was performed to determine the recommended phase II dose of oral capecitabine to be delivered concurrently with thoracic radiation therapy and weekly docetaxel in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma., Methods: Patients with operable stage II or III esophageal carcinoma were staged by endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography. Two cycles of docetaxel (80 mg/m) and carboplatin (target area under the concentration-time curve: 6 mg/ml × min) were delivered over 6 weeks. This was followed by concurrent weekly docetaxel (15 mg/m), thoracic radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions), and increasing doses of capecitabine (500-3500 mg) given before each fraction of radiotherapy. After restaging, responding patients continued to esophagectomy within 4 to 8 weeks of completing chemoradiotherapy., Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled, and 40 were assessable for the dose-ranging component of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Endoscopic ultrasonography stages at enrollment were T3N1 (29 patients), T3N0 (4 patients), T2N1 (6 patients), and T4N0 (one patient). The maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine was 3500 mg. Thirty-six patients had surgery; 83% had R0 resection, and 17% had pathological complete response. Median overall survival was 23.5 months, with 34 and 27% alive at 3 and 5 years., Conclusion: The recommended phase II dose of capecitabine is 3500 mg when given concurrently with 50.4 Gy of thoracic radiotherapy in 28 fractions and weekly docetaxel. This trimodality therapy for operable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma was very well tolerated and remarkably active. This regimen holds promise for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma and warrants further investigation.

Associations between bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), mucinous differentiation, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations have been previously reported in studies of surgical specimens. We present the cytomorphology of lung adenocarcinomas, including metastases that were diagnosed by cytologic methods and the relationship to both EGFR and KRAS mutational status. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and cytomorphologic features of 50 lung adenocarcinomas that were tested for both EGFR and KRAS mutations. Cytomorphologic features evaluated included cell size, architectural pattern, nucleoli, intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions (INCI), mucin, necrosis, squamoid features, lymphocytic response, and histologic features of BAC differentiation. DNA was extracted from a paraffin-embedded cell block or frozen needle core fragments. Exon 19 deletions and the L858R mutation in exon 21 of EGFR were detected using PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis for fragment sizing. KRAS mutational analysis was performed by real-time PCR using a set of seven different Taqman(r) allelic discrimination assays to detect six mutations in codon 12 and one mutation in codon 13. Six cases (12%) showed EGFR mutations, 12 (24%) showed KRAS mutations, and 38 (62%) contained neither EGFR nor KRAS mutations. The majority of patients had stage IV disease (78%); 20 samples (40%) were from metastatic sites. The presence of prominent INCI (P = 0.036), papillary fragments (P = 0.041), and histologic features of BAC on paraffin block (P = 0.039) correlated with the presence of EGFR mutations. The presence of necrosis (P = 0.030), squamoid features (P = 0.048), and poorly differentiated tumors (P = 0.025) were more likely to be identified in the KRAS positive group., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: ABT-751 is a novel antimitotic agent that exerted cytotoxic effects in preclinical studies. Carboplatin has efficacy in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with other drugs., Methods: Lung cancer cell lines were treated with ABT-751 and/or carboplatin to investigate their impact on cell growth. A phase I study with an expansion cohort was conducted in previously treated NSCLC patients. The primary objective was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary objectives were objective response rates, median survival, time to tumor progression, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacodynamic evaluation of buccal swabs., Results: Combining ABT-751 with carboplatin significantly reduced growth and induced apoptosis of lung cancer cell lines. Twenty advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled. MTD was ABT-751 125 mg orally twice daily for 7 days with carboplatin AUC 6. DLTs included fatigue, ileus, neutropenia and pneumonitis. Two patients had confirmed partial responses. Median overall survival was 11.7 months (95% CI 5.9-27.0). Time to tumor progression was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.0-2.7). Four of 6 patients showed decreased cyclin D1 protein in posttreatment versus pretreatment buccal swabs., Conclusion: Combining ABT-751 with carboplatin suppressed growth of lung cancer cell lines and had modest clinical antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC previously treated predominantly with carboplatin. Further studies of this combination are not recommended while investigations of biomarkers in different patient populations, alternative schedules and combinations may be pursued., (Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Inflammatory pathways may be an important contributor to morbidity and mortality associated with lung cancer. The oncogene-associated inflammatory microenvironment leads to production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6. IL-6 is associated with poor prognosis and correlates with debilitating lung-cancer-related symptoms such as fatigue, thromboembolism, cachexia and anemia. IL-6 has been implicated in resistance of lung cancer to EGF inhibitors. A mAb therapy targeting IL-6 may be an effective treatment for the inflammatory microenvironment in lung cancer., Areas Covered: An understanding of the inflammatory pathways involved in lung cancer, including the central role of IL-6, and how inflammation affects the course and treatment of lung cancer. The mAb ALD518, which targets IL-6, and its investigational development and use in advanced NSCLC. Preclinical and Phase I and II studies of ALD518 with a focus on NSCLC. How ALD518 could be used in NSCLC in the future., Expert Opinion: IL-6-mediated inflammation may contribute to NSCLC-related morbidity and mortality. In preclinical and Phase I and II trials ALD518 targeting IL-6 appears well tolerated and ameliorates NSCLC-related anemia and cachexia. Other clinical outcomes need further study, and may include effects on overall survival, hypercoagulability associated with lung cancer and decreased resistance to EGF-pathway inhibitors.

The rexinoid bexarotene represses cyclin D1 by causing its proteasomal degradation. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib represses cyclin D1 via different mechanisms. We conducted a preclinical study and 2 clinical/translational trials (a window-of-opportunity and phase II) of bexarotene plus erlotinib. The combination repressed growth and cyclin D1 expression in cyclin-E- and KRAS/p53-driven transgenic lung cancer cells. The window-of-opportunity trial in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (10 evaluable), including cases with KRAS mutations, repressed cyclin D1 (in tumor biopsies and buccal swabs) and induced necrosis and inflammatory responses. The phase II trial in heavily pretreated, advanced NSCLC patients (40 evaluable; a median of two prior relapses per patient (range, 0-5); 21% with prior EGFR-inhibitor therapy) produced three major clinical responses in patients with prolonged progression-free survival (583-, 665-, and 1,460-plus days). Median overall survival was 22 weeks. Hypertriglyceridemia was associated with an increased median overall survival (P = 0.001). Early PET (positron emission tomographic) response did not reliably predict clinical response. The combination was generally well tolerated, with toxicities similar to those of the single agents. In conclusion, bexarotene plus erlotinib was active in KRAS-driven lung cancer cells, was biologically active in early-stage mutant KRAS NSCLC, and was clinically active in advanced, chemotherapy-refractory mutant KRAS tumors in this study and previous trials. Additional lung cancer therapy or prevention trials with this oral regimen are warranted.

Importance of the Field: Current therapeutic options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) yield relatively modest improvements in survival leading to an ongoing search for new active treatment agents. In the past decade, pemetrexed has had an increasingly established role in the treatment of advanced NSCLC in both first- and second-line settings., Areas Covered in This Review: Currently available published data on mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced NSCLC are described. Peer-reviewed publications on the development of pemetrexed and its clinical use in NSCLC were reviewed (1995 - 2009)., What the Reader Will Gain: Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate cytotoxic agent. Key Phase II and Phase III trials are described that have shown pemetrexed's efficacy in both the first- and second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. The efficacy of pemetrexed seems to vary between squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Possible reasons for this are explored. Additionally, the potential role of pemetrexed in maintenance therapy is discussed., Take Home Message: Pemetrexed is an effective treatment for advanced NSCLC, with an overall favorable toxicity profile. There is growing evidence that, in patients treated with pemetrexed, nonsquamous tumors have improved outcomes compared to squamous cell tumors. Pemetrexed may also have a role in maintenance therapy for NSCLC.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the objective response rate of bortezomib as a first-line therapy in patients advanced stage NSCLC. Advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients with measurable disease, adequate organ function, ECOG performance status of 0-2, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were eligible. Patients received intravenously bolus bortezomib 1.3mg/m(2)/day on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles, or until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was evaluated after every 2 cycles of therapy. This single-arm phase II study employed the Simon's two-stage design. The study was terminated in the first stage after 14 patients enrolled at 4 institutions. No objective response was observed. Three patients (21%) had stable disease and received 8, 6 and 4 cycles of treatment; the duration of stable disease was 11.5, 4.2 and 3.4 months, respectively. Median time to progression was 1.3 months (95% CI, 0.6-3.0 months); median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months (95% CI, 2.2-27.0 months). Twelve patients received at least one dose of bortezomib. There were no grade 4 toxicities or treatment related deaths. Grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (N=1, 8%), deep vein thrombosis (N=1, 8%) and thrombocytopenia (N=1, 8%). Although well tolerated, bortezomib monotherapy is not active in this cohort of chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic NSCLC., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This randomized phase II study was initially designed to test the activity of two dose schedules of lapatinib (GW572016H), an oral, reversible, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human EGFR-2 (HER2/neu; HER2), in chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); it was later amended to target patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma or no smoking history., Experimental Design: Patients with good performance status and recurrent or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to lapatinib (orally, 1,500 mg once daily or 500 mg twice daily) until progression or intolerance. Patients could have had a maximum of one prior systemic therapy (chemotherapy or biological therapy) for NSCLC. Safety and activity were assessed every 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Tumors were analyzed for EGFR and HER2 mutations and/or amplifications., Results: Of 75 patients in the nontargeted population, 1 (1.3%) had partial response and 16 (21%) had stable disease of >or=24 weeks. No complete or partial responses were observed in 56 patients in the targeted population; 14 (25%) had stable disease of >or=24 weeks. No responses were seen in three patients with EGFR mutations and five with EGFR gene amplification. No mutations in HER2 were found. One of two patients with HER2 amplification had a 51% decrease in tumor size; however, this response was unconfirmed. The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 diarrhea, rash, fatigue, nausea, and anorexia. Adverse events were similar across dosing regimens., Conclusions: Lapatinib was well tolerated, with no notable difference in toxicity between treatment groups. Lapatinib monotherapy did not induce a significant number of tumor regressions in NSCLC. Further studies may be warranted to determine whether lapatinib is active in combination with other agents in the treatment of NSCLC.

Background/aims: A single-institution phase I trial to determine the feasibility of using filgrastim or pegfilgrastim to increase the dose intensity of biweekly docetaxel and gemcitabine., Methods: Patients with metastatic solid tumors received gemcitabine 3,000 mg/m(2) and increasing doses of docetaxel (55 mg/m(2) in 10 mg/m(2) increments) every 14 days with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim., Results: 35 patients enrolled, median 2 prior therapies, 158 cycles of therapy. There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (sepsis) at docetaxel 55 mg/m(2), 1 DLT (sepsis/diarrhea) at docetaxel 65 mg/m(2), and no DLT at docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). At docetaxel 85 mg/m(2), 2/4 patients had DLT (fatigue/dyspnea, diarrhea). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel was 75 mg/m(2). 1/12 patients treated at MTD experienced DLT (sepsis/dyspnea). The initial 25 patients received filgrastim (average 7 doses/cycle), the last 10 received pegfilgrastim., Conclusions: The MTD for docetaxel was 75 mg/m(2) with gemcitabine 3,000 mg/m(2) given every 14 days with filgrastim or pegfilgrastim. This regimen was well tolerated with signs of clinical activity. We found no significant differences in toxicities or effectiveness between daily filgrastim and pegfilgrastim given 13 days before the next chemotherapy. The use of granulocyte growth factors allowed increased dose intensity of docetaxel and gemcitabine. This regimen warrants further study in chemotherapy-naïve patients and patients with earlier stages., ((c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Little is known about the carcinogenic potential of arsenic in areas with low to moderate concentrations of arsenic (< 100 microg/L) in drinking water., Objectives: We examined associations between arsenic and lung cancer., Methods: A population-based case-control study of primary incident lung cancer was conducted in 10 counties in two U.S. states, New Hampshire and Vermont. The study included 223 lung cancer cases and 238 controls, each of whom provided toenail clippings for arsenic exposure measurement by inductively coupled-plasma mass spectrometry. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of the association between arsenic exposure and lung cancer using unconditional logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders (age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking pack-years, education, body mass index, fish servings per week, and toenail selenium level)., Results: Arsenic exposure was associated with small-cell and squamous-cell carcinoma of the lung [OR = 2.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-7.57] for toenail arsenic concentration > or = 0.114 microg/g, versus < 0.05 microg/g. A history of lung disease (bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or fibrosis) was positively associated with lung cancer (OR = 2.86; 95% CI, 1.39-5.91). We also observed an elevated risk of lung cancer among participants with a history of lung disease and toenail arsenic > or = 0.05 microg/g (OR = 4.78; 95% CI, 1.87-12.2) than among individuals with low toenail arsenic and no history of lung disease., Conclusion: Although this study supports the possibility of an increased risk of specific lung cancer histologic types at lower levels of arsenic exposure, we recommend large-scale population-based studies.

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a multifaceted disease that is challenging to manage. The majority of patients can be appropriately treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy; however, a subset of stage III patients who are considered surgical candidates may require a modification of this plan. For example, a trimodal approach using chemoradiation followed by surgery may be beneficial for fit patients with bulky mediastinal disease who are candidates for lobectomy, whereas patients with minimal mediastinal nodal involvement may receive only chemotherapy before surgical resection. No standard chemotherapy exists for this group of stage IIIA resectable patients. Phase II data from studies employing neoadjuvant cisplatin combinations suggest that these regimens are active and well tolerated. For patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care at the present time for patients with good performance status, good pulmonary function tests, and an acceptable volume of normal lung receiving 20 Gy (V20). To manage distant micrometastasis further, induction and consolidation regimens are under investigation during which full-dose chemotherapy is administered either before (as induction) or after (as consolidation) concurrent chemoradiotherapy. To date, consolidation docetaxel after concurrent etoposide, cisplatin and thoracic radiation has shown encouraging survival results in a large Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial. This article will review the current treatment strategies for stage III NSCLC.

Objectives: Many patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cannot tolerate intravenous chemotherapy. Orally active agents would be more convenient and thus could improve their quality of life., Methods: A total of 189 patients were randomized 2:1, 181 patients received treatment, 120 PO and 61 IV vinorelbine, 158 patients had stage IV and 31 stage IIIB disease. Among patients who received PO vinorelbine, the median age was 72 years, 62% were males; the Karnofski Performance Status (KPS) was 80-100 in 71%. These compare with a median age of 70 years, 56% male, and KPS of 80-100 in 65% of patients who received IV vinorelbine. Oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 was to be dose-escalated to 70 mg/m2 after the initial 3-weekly doses if there was no unacceptable toxicity. Intravenous vinorelbine was to be given 30 mg/m2 weekly., Results: Five patients (4%) on PO and 8 (13%) on IV vinorelbine had a confirmed partial response, 56 (44%) and 29 (46%) had stable disease, respectively. Median time-to-disease-progression was 16.6 weeks (PO) versus 23.9 weeks (IV), and the median survival was 26 weeks (PO) versus 40.9 weeks IV vinorelbine. Median survival on PO vinorelbine for patients with KPS 60-70 was 8.3 weeks versus 43 weeks (IV). On PO vinorelbine 59 patients (57%) were dose escalated, 9 (7.5%) were dose reduced, and 10 (8.3%) did not receive PO vinorelbine at week 4. Pharmacokinetic studies confirmed PO vinorelbine exposure was significantly less than IV exposure., Conclusion: The inability to escalate the dose of PO vinorelbine above 60 mg/m2 weekly resulted in inferiority to IV vinorelbine at 30 mg/m2 weekly, especially in patients with poor performance status.

Purpose: Bexarotene is a rexinoid (selective retinoid X receptor agonist) that affects proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in preclinical studies. The relationship between bexarotene levels and biomarker changes in tumor tissues has not been previously studied., Experimental Design: BEAS-2B human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells, retinoid-resistant BEAS-2B-R1 cells, A427, H226, and H358 lung cancer cells were treated with bexarotene. Proliferation and biomarker expression were assessed. In a proof-of-principle clinical trial, bexarotene tumor tissue levels and intratumoral pharmacodynamic effects were assessed in patients with stages I to II non-small cell lung cancer. Bexarotene (300 mg/m(2)/day) was administered p.o. for 7 to 9 days before resection., Results: Bexarotene-induced dosage-dependent repression of growth, cyclin D1, cyclin D3, total epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and phospho-EGFR expression in BEAS-2B, BEAS-2B-R1, A427, and H358, but not H226 cells. Twelve patients were enrolled, and 10 were evaluable. Bexarotene treatment was well tolerated. There was nonlinear correlation between plasma and tumor bexarotene concentrations (r(2) = 0.77). Biomarker changes in tumors were observed: repression of cyclin D1, total EGFR and proliferation in one case; repression of cyclin D3, total and phospho-EGFR in another. The cases with multiple biomarker changes had high tumor bexarotene (107-159 ng/g). A single biomarker change was detected in one case with low tumor bexarotene., Conclusion: Bexarotene represses proliferation and biomarker expression in responsive, but not resistant HBE and lung cancer cells. Similar biomarker changes occur in lung tumors when therapeutic intratumoral bexarotene levels are achieved. This proof-of-principle trial approach is useful to uncover pharmacodynamic mechanisms in vivo and relate these to intratumoral pharmacokinetic effects.

Background: Cisplatin-induced anemia may correlate with adverse events, poor quality of life (QoL), decreased adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) dose intensity, shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS)., Methods: The JBR.10 trial demonstrated significantly longer survival with adjuvant cisplatin and vinorelbine (n=242) compared to observation (n=240) in patients with resected NSCLC [Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, Rigas J, Johnston M, Butts C, et al. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;352(25):2640-2]. This exploratory analysis evaluates the predictive value of baseline (in all patients) and during-treatment (in ACT arm only) hemoglobin (Hb) levels on OS and RFS when adjusted for prognostic factors. Baseline (in all patients) and during treatment (in ACT arm only) Hb levels were also correlated with adverse events, QoL, morbidity and ACT dose intensity., Results: Baseline Hb did not predict RFS or OS. However, there was a trend to shorter OS (p=0.1) when baseline Hb was <120g/L. Lower baseline Hb predicted increased hospitalization (p=0.04) and worse QoL (SOB item, p=0.03) but had no impact on adverse events or dose intensity. There was a trend to longer RFS (p=0.08) in patients with lower nadir during-treatment Hb and to longer OS (p=0.06) and RFS (p=0.08) in patients with maximum during-treatment Hb drop >30% that was not maintained when ACT dose intensity was included in the model. Maximum during-treatment Hb drop >30% correlated with increased lethargy (p=0.003) and worse QoL (fatigue item, p=0.07)., Conclusions: Lower baseline and during-treatment Hb levels seem associated with poorer QoL, fatigue and increased hospitalization. There is a trend for shorter OS in patients with lower baseline Hb levels.

Tobacco carcinogen treatment of immortalized human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells has uncovered novel targets for cancer chemoprevention. Experiments were conducted with HBE cells and independent treatments with tobacco carcinogens along with the chemopreventive agent all-trans-retinoic acid (RA). That work highlighted D-type and E-type cyclins as novel molecular pharmacologic targets of several chemopreventive agents. G1 cyclins are often aberrantly expressed in bronchial preneoplasia and lung cancers. This implicated these species as targets for clinical cancer chemoprevention. Retinoid regulation mechanisms of D-type cyclins in lung cancer chemoprevention have been comprehensively explored. Retinoid chemoprevention has been mechanistically linked to proteasomal degradation of cyclin D1 and cyclin D3. Threonine 286 mutation stabilized cyclin D1, implicating phosphorylation in this retinoid chemoprevention. Studies with a phospho-specific anti-cyclin D1 antibody confirmed this hypothesis. Glycogen synthase kinase (GSK) inhibitors established a role for this kinase in the retinoid regulation of cyclin D1, but not cyclin D3. Involvement of D-type cyclins in this chemoprevention was shown using small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Gene profiling experiments highlighted the E1-like ubiquitin-activating enzyme (UBE1L) in the retinoid regulation of cyclin D1. Proof of principle trials have translated these studies into the clinic and established that chemopreventive agents can target D-type cyclins. These findings have been built upon with a targeted combination regimen that cooperatively affects D-type cyclins. Taken together, these preclinical and clinical findings strongly implicate these cyclins as novel molecular pharmacological targets for cancer chemoprevention.

This study evaluated enoxaparin alone versus initial enoxaparin followed by warfarin in secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in adults with active malignancy. Cancer patients (n = 122) with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolic events were randomly allocated to receive subcutaneous enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours for 5 days, followed by 1.0 mg/kg daily (group 1a) or 1.5 mg/kg daily (group 1b) for 175 days, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours for at least 5 days and until a stable international normalized ratio of 2 to 3 was achieved on oral warfarin begun on day 2 and continued to day 180 (group 2). There were no significant differences in major and minor bleeding rates between treatment groups. No bleeding events were intracranial or fatal. Enoxaparin treatment was feasible, generally well tolerated, and effective for a 180-day period in the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with active malignancy.

Purpose: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cyclin D1 are overexpressed in lung carcinogenesis. The rexinoid, bexarotene, represses cyclin D1 and EGFR expression in vitro. It was hypothesized that combining bexarotene with the EGFR inhibitor, erlotinib, would augment clinical activity., Patients and Methods: In vitro studies and a phase I clinical trial were performed. Twenty-four patients with advanced aerodigestive tract cancers were enrolled; 79% had non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose. Clinical activity was a secondary objective., Results: Combining erlotinib with bexarotene enhanced growth suppression in vitro compared with each single-agent treatment. This cooperatively repressed cyclin D1 expression. Clinically, the most frequent toxicities were mild hypertriglyceridemia and skin rash. Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred (creatine phosphokinase elevation attributed to antilipid therapy and a case of generalized pain). Five objective responses (four partial and one minor) were observed in NSCLC patients. Responses were observed in males and smokers. EGFR sequence analyses did not reveal activating mutations in tumors from assessable responding patients. Median time to progression was 2.0 months; overall survival time was 14.1 months; and 1-year survival rate was 73.8%., Conclusion: The recommended phase II doses are erlotinib 150 mg/d and bexarotene 400 mg/m2/d orally. These agents can be administered in combination at the recommended single-agent doses without added toxicity. Overall survival and clinical features of responding patients differ from prior reports of single-agent erlotinib treatment. These findings are encouraging and warrant further investigation of this regimen.

The treatment of unresectable stage III NSCLC remains challenging. However, in the last two decades, advances in terms of survival prolongation have been made, first by administering chemotherapy with definitive thoracic radiotherapy sequentially, and then by administering these two modalities concurrently. Most recently, induction and consolidation regimens have been evaluated which involve adding chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (as induction) or after (as consolidation). Thus far, the consolidation approach appears to be promising. For example, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide followed by consolidation docetaxel yielded an impressive median survival of 26 months in a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial. A phase III trial showed interesting results in a subset of patients that received docetaxel consolidation prior to randomization to gefitinib or placebo. Although stopped early due to lack of benefit of gefitinib, preliminary results showed a median survival time of 29 months in the placebo arm. A randomized trial is currently underway that compares concurrent chemoradiotherapy (using cisplatin and etoposide) followed by either docetaxel consolidation or no further therapy.

Esophageal cancer is the ninth most common malignancy in the world and the seventh leading cause of death in American men. Because symptoms are often intermittent and vague, patients typically present at an advanced stage, with limited survival. In operable patients, standard care includes surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy; chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the standard care for inoperable disease. Docetaxel, a taxane that promotes polymerization of tubules and inhibits depolymerization of microtubules, has shown in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects on human gastric cell lines and gastric cancer xenografts. These antitumor effects have led to the evaluation of docetaxel as a single agent and in combination with other agents and modalities in patients with esophageal cancer. Results of relevant trials are reviewed herein.

Purpose: Therapy for high-grade gliomas remains unsatisfactory. Paclitaxel and topotecan have separately demonstrated activity against gliomas. We conducted a Phase II trial of these agents in combination with filgrastim (G-CSF) in patients with recurrent or refractory glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma., Patients and Methods: Adult patients with radiographic evidence of recurrent or progressive tumor following primary therapy were eligible for study. Patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 h on day 1 and topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 IV over 30 min on days 1-5. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg was given days 6-14 for neutrophil support. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled on study, and seventeen were considered evaluable for response. Two patients (12/%) exhibited partial remission and seven patients (41/%) exhibited stable disease in response to therapy. Hematologic toxicity was common with 25 /% of patients experiencing grade III or IV leukopenia despite G-CSF support. Two patients died of infectious complications on protocol, prompting suspension of further accrual., Conclusion: Paclitaxel and topotecan with G-CSF support exhibits modest activity in adults with recurrent or refractory glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. The significant hematotoxicity encountered, however, cannot justify further investigation of this combination in patients with high grade brain tumors.

The retinoids are natural and synthetic derivatives of vitamin A. These cancer therapeutic and chemopreventive agents exert antiproliferative, differentiation-inducing, proapoptotic, and other biologic effects. The retinoids act through nuclear retinoid receptors to activate target genes that signal biologic effects. Agents that specifically activate the nuclear retinoid X receptors (RXRs) are known as rexinoids. Rexinoid growth suppression of human bronchial epithelial cells was linked to triggering of G1 cell cycle arrest, concomitant growth suppression, and a decrease in expression of G1 cyclins through activation of a proteasome-dependent degradation pathway. Clinical studies have demonstrated prolonged survival of subsets of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with rexinoids as single agents or as part of combination regimens. The critical role of RXR in downstream signaling makes rexinoids especially attractive agents to consider in combination therapy. There is encouraging evidence for therapeutic benefit of combination regimens of rexinoids with other targeted agents, such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and with chemotherapy. Results from randomized phase III clinical trials in NSCLC will ultimately determine the impact for rexinoid-based therapy or chemoprevention for lung cancer.

Although the introduction of third-generation antineoplastic agents in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has led to modest improvements in overall patient survival, lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and improved therapies are needed. Retinoids play a critical role in the regulation of cell division, growth, differentiation, and proliferation, and they represent an exciting new avenue for targeted therapy. Several synthetic retinoids that bind to retinoic acid receptors are currently being investigated in a variety of tumor types. However, many of these agents have been associated with cheilitis, skin reactions, severe headache, and hypertriglyceridemia. Synthetic agents that bind specifically to retinoid X receptors are called rexinoids. Bexarotene (Targretin; Ligand Pharmaceuticals; San Diego, CA; http://www.ligand.com) is a novel, multitargeted synthetic rexinoid that is currently being investigated in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Phase I and II studies have demonstrated that bexarotene is safe and well tolerated in this patient population either alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. Patients treated with bexarotene experience manageable adverse events at reduced levels compared with retinoic acid receptor-specific retinoids. Bexarotene in combination with chemotherapeutic agents has demonstrated an encouraging median survival for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer compared with historical results with combination chemotherapy alone. Two phase III trials are currently under way to fully characterize the role of bexarotene in the treatment of this disease. The purpose of this review is to explore the rationale for rexinoids in the treatment of malignancies and to discuss the clinical profile of bexarotene in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are active in cancer therapy. Mechanisms engaged during these clinical responses need to be determined. We reported previously that epidermal growth factor stimulation markedly increased cyclin D1 protein expression in human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells, and this was opposed by chemoprevention with all-trans-retinoic acid. The current study sought to determine whether the EGFR TKI erlotinib repressed cyclin D1 protein expression in immortalized HBE cells, lung cancer cell lines, and clinical aerodigestive tract cancers., Experimental Design: The BEAS-2B immortalized HBE cell line was exposed to varying concentrations of erlotinib, and effects on proliferation, cell cycle distribution, G1 cyclin expression, and cyclin D1 reporter activity were measured. Non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines were also evaluated for changes in proliferation and cyclin protein expression after erlotinib treatments. A proof of principle clinical trial was conducted. During this study, patients underwent a 9-day course of erlotinib treatment. Pretreatment and posttreatment tumor biopsies were obtained, and changes in candidate biomarkers were determined by immunostaining. Plasma pharmacokinetics and tumor tissue erlotinib concentrations were measured., Results: Erlotinib, at clinically achievable dosages, repressed BEAS-2B cell growth, triggered G1 arrest, and preferentially reduced cyclin D1 protein expression and transcriptional activation. Erlotinib also preferentially repressed proliferation and cyclin D1 protein expression in responsive, but not resistant, non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines. This occurred in the presence of wild-type EGFR sequence at exons 18, 19, and 21. Five patients were enrolled onto an erlotinib proof of principle clinical trial, and four cases were evaluable. Pharmacokinetic studies established therapeutic erlotinib plasma levels in all patients, but tissue levels exceeding 2 micromol/L were detected in only two cases. Notably, these cases had pathological evidence of response (necrosis) in posttreatment biopsies as compared with pretreatment biopsies. In these cases, marked repression of cyclin D1 and the proliferation marker Ki-67 was detected by immunohistochemical assays. Cases without pathological response to erlotinib did not exhibit changes in cyclin D1 or Ki-67 immunohistochemical expression and had much lower erlotinib tissue levels than did responding cases., Conclusions: Taken together, these in vitro and in vivo findings provide direct evidence for repression of cyclin D1 protein as a surrogate marker of response in aerodigestive tract cancers to erlotinib treatment. These findings also provide a rationale for combining an EGFR TKI with an agent that would cooperatively repress cyclin D1 expression in clinical trials for aerodigestive tract cancer therapy or chemoprevention.

Background: Motion sickness remains a significant problem for travelers and for those involved in naval, aviation and space operations. Many motion sickness remedies are also sedating, making them undesirable in many settings., Methods: We studied chlorpheniramine as a potential motion sickness treatment. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging trial was performed to establish the most effective dose and the drug's effects on cognition. Eighteen normal, motion sickness susceptible subjects received placebo, low dose (4 mg) or high dose (12 mg) chlorpheniramine 3.5 hours before off-axis vertical rotation. Cognitive testing included a battery of objective and subjective tests performed before drug ingestion, at peak drug effect and following rotation., Results: Chlorpheniramine significantly increased the time in the chair compared to placebo at high dose (7.2 minutes to 11.7 minutes) and low dose (7.2 minutes to 10.2 minutes). Chlorpheniramine did not affect performance on objective cognitive tests. Subjects reported significantly more sleepiness and less alertness with high-dose chlorpheniramine, although they could not reliably determine when they had received active drug., Conclusion: Chlorpheniramine is effective and could be considered for use against motion sickness. Chlorpheniramine also has the potential to be administered transdermally.

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As a result of their single-agent activities and synergistic effects, taxane-platinum combinations are often used as first-line therapy for this disease. Four large, multicenter, randomized phase III clinical trials (the TAX 326 trial, the Southwest Oncology Group 9509 trial, the Italian Lung Cancer Project, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1594 trial) have compared taxane-platinum combinations (docetaxel and paclitaxel) with other platinum combinations (vinorelbine and gemcitabine) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with good performance status scores and advanced disease. The end points for these large randomized clinical trials were survival, response rate, adverse events, and quality of life (QOL). Of the taxane-platinum combinations tested, docetaxel-cisplatin was the only platinum combination to yield survival and response rates superior to another platinum combination. In adverse event terms, the taxane-platinum combination of paclitaxel-carboplatin demonstrated less grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and lower rates of febrile neutropenia than other taxane-platinum combinations but higher rates of irreversible grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy than any of the other taxane-platinum combinations. Additional differences emerged when QOL data were evaluated. The docetaxel-platinum combination demonstrated broad QOL benefits for patients receiving this combination, and this benefit was not observed with the other platinum or taxane-platinum combinations. As our use of these taxane-platinum combinations expands, these differences in survival, response rate, adverse events, and QOL will permit us to better balance our treatment goals for all patients with all stages of NSCLC.

Purpose: To identify predictors of treatment outcome and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with docetaxel., Experimental Design: The data were collected from 180 NSCLC patients enrolled in six docetaxel Phase II studies at a dose of 100 mg/m(2). Clinical end points for this study were safety reported as the first course adverse events requiring dose reduction, and efficacy was measured by response rate and survival. The independent variables included docetaxel dose, individual estimates of clearance, area under the plasma concentration time curve, extent of previous treatment, and covariables related to the patient's demographics, extent of disease, and performance status. The data were analyzed using a logistic regression model for response and severe adverse events and a Cox multivariate regression model for survival., Results: Docetaxel exposure as measured by the area under the plasma concentration time curve was the only significant predictor (P < 0.0001) of severe toxicity during the first course of therapy. Baseline alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) was the only significant predictor of response with an odds ratio of 0.44 for changes in AAG from 1.11 to 1.85 grams/liter (P = 0.0039). Cumulative dose, AAG, and extent of disease were independent predictors of survival (P < 0.005). The median survival varied from 15.6 months for patients with a low AAG (AAG < or = 1.11 grams/liter) to 5.5 months for patients with a high AAG (AAG >/= 1.85 grams/liter)., Conclusion: AAG appears to be an independent predictor of response and a major objective prognostic factor of survival in patients with NSCLC treated with docetaxel chemotherapy.

A number of newer chemotherapeutic agents including docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and vinorelbine have demonstrated substantial activity in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their palliative role as single agents and in combination with platinum has been well defined in NSCLC. More recently, combining these agents without platinum has been the primary objective of numerous worldwide clinical trials. Two of these docetaxel/nonplatinum-based combinations have demonstrated comparable activity to platinum-based regimens in randomized trials. While platinum-based chemotherapy remains an important therapy for treatment of NSCLC, nonplatinum combinations may be a reasonable alternative for patients. These docetaxel/nonplatinum combinations warrant further evaluation in randomized trials to define their optimal role as standard therapy for NSCLC.

Non-platinum combination regimens have been developed for advanced non--small cell lung cancer using the novel and active agents docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan. The aim of these combinations is to equal or exceed the survival benefits achieved with cisplatin doublets while minimizing toxicity. Of the docetaxel-based combinations, gemcitabine has been the most extensively studied. In a 317-patient randomized trial, docetaxel plus gemcitabine achieved a response rate of 34%, similar to the 32% response rate seen in patients randomized to docetaxel plus cisplatin. One-year survival rates were 38% and 42%, respectively. While being equally active, the docetaxel/gemcitabine combination was associated with significantly less neutropenia and gastrointestinal adverse events than the cisplatin-containing regimen. Phase II trials of docetaxel plus vinorelbine have reported response rates of up to 51% and 1-year survival in up to 60% of patients without significant peripheral neuropathy. Docetaxel plus irinotecan is also active in advanced non--small cell lung cancer and has shown similar efficacy to docetaxel plus cisplatin in a randomized trial. The adverse event profile of docetaxel/irinotecan is different from that of cisplatin-based regimens. Both non-platinum and platinum combination regimens have an important role to play in the treatment of non--small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 9):15-20., (Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.)

Purpose: Bexarotene (Targretin; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA) is a retinoid-X-receptor (RXR)-selective retinoid with preclinical antitumor activity in squamous cell cancers. In this phase I/II trial, we combined bexarotene with cisplatin and vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Forty-three patients who had stage IIIB NSCLC with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC and had received no prior therapy received bexarotene in combination with cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (alternating doses of 30 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2). In the phase I portion, the daily dose of bexarotene was escalated in cohorts of three patients from 150 mg/m2 to 600 mg/m2, beginning 1 week before the start of the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen. Once the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of bexarotene was determined, the study entered the phase II portion. Response rate was the primary end point; median survival time and 1-year survival rate were secondary end points., Results: In the phase I portion, the daily MTD of bexarotene was determined to be 400 mg/m2. Eight of 43 patients exhibited major responses. Seven (25%) of the 28 patients in the phase II portion responded to treatment. The median survival time in the phase II portion was 14 months; nine (32%) of the 28 patients were still alive at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. One-year and projected 3-year survival rates were 61% and 30%, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hyperlipemia, leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, pneumonia, dyspnea, anemia, and asthenia. Grade 3 and 4 laboratory abnormalities with incidences greater than 5% were decreased hemoglobin levels and WBC, absolute neutrophil, and absolute lymphocyte counts and increased prothrombin time and creatinine and amylase levels. Of the two cases of pancreatitis, one required hospitalization and both were associated with increased triglyceride levels. There was one death secondary to renal insufficiency unrelated to bexarotene treatment., Conclusion: In patients with advanced NSCLC, bexarotene with cisplatin and vinorelbine yielded acceptable phase II response rates (25%) and was associated with better-than-expected survival (14-month median survival time; 61% 1-year, 32% 2-year, and 30% projected 3-year survival rates). The regimen should be studied in larger clinical trials.

The potential benefits of docetaxel (Taxotere; Aventis, Antony, France) to patients with previously-treated non-small cell lung cancer have been evaluated in two prospective randomized phase III trials. In one study, patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer who had failed previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive either docetaxel (100 or 75 mg/m2, once every 3 weeks) or best supportive care. Median survival was significantly longer for patients treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (7.5 months v 4.6 months) as was 1-year survival (37% v 11%). A second trial, also in platinum-pretreated patients, randomized patients to docetaxel 100 mg/m2, docetaxel 75 mg/m2, or vinorelbine/ifosfamide. Median survival was similar across the three study groups. Thirty-two percent of patients assigned to docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and 21% to docetaxel 100 mg/m2, were alive at 1 year, versus 19% on the vinorelbine/ifosfamide arm. Docetaxel offers clinically meaningful benefits in the second-line setting. The recommended dose is 75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. The adverse events observed were predictable, tolerable, and manageable. These phase III trials showed that docetaxel provided clinical benefits to patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

The 1990s have introduced a number of novel chemotherapeutic agents with activity in non small-cell lung carcinoma. Docetaxel and gemcitabine appear to be two of the most active new agents. Their use in non small-cell lung carcinoma has been associated with improvements in survival, palliation of symptoms, and maintenance of quality of life when compared to best supportive care. Options for treatment of non small-cell lung carcinoma after platinum have been limited. These newer agents have substantial activity in this subset of patients. This review focuses on the current data using the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine in the fight against non small-cell lung carcinoma.