Search

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of death and disability. Several diagnostic tests, such as myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), are accurate for the detection of CAD, as well as having prognostic value for the prediction of cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the diagnostic and prognostic value of these tests should be cost-effective and should lead to improved clinical outcome. We have reviewed the literature on the cost-effectiveness of MPS in different circumstances: (i) the diagnosis and management of CAD; (ii) comparison with exercise electrocardiography (ECG) and other imaging tests; (iii) as gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), (iv) the impact of appropriate use criteria; (v) acute chest pain, and (vi) screening of asymptomatic patients with type-2 diabetes. In total 57 reports were included. Although most non-invasive imaging tests are cost-effective compared with alternatives, the data conflict on which non-invasive strategy is the most cost-effective. Different definitions of cost-effectiveness further confound the subject. Computer simulations of clinical diagnosis and management are influenced by the assumptions made. For instance, diagnostic accuracy is often defined against an anatomical standard that is wrongly assumed to be perfect. Conflicting data arise most commonly from these incorrect or differing assumptions.

Background Preclinical studies have consistently shown that erythropoietin (EPO), administered after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), reduces infarct size and improves left ventricular function. Furthermore, EPO promotes endothelial progenitor cell growth, which increases angiogenesis. A recent pilot study in patients with AMI suggested that a single bolus of EPO was safe and well tolerated.Methods The HEBE III is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label trial with blinded evaluation of the primary end point. The primary objective is to study the effect on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of a single bolus of EPO, administered directly after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for a first AMI. A total of 466 patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 0/1 flow before the PCI procedure and 2/3 flow after a successful PCI are randomly assigned to either receive standard medical care or a single bolus with 60,000 IU of EPO on top of standard medical care within 3 hours of the PCI procedure. Primary end point of the study is LVEF after 6 weeks, assessed by planar radionuclide ventriculography.Implications If an improvement of LVEF with a single bolus of EPO is demonstrated, this simple approach might further improve clinical outcome of patients with AMI.