Search

Twenty-two children, ages 5 to 17, described their experiences living within a family that included a parent with a psychiatric disability who was involved in community mental health agency services. The children's descriptions of parents' 'good days' and 'bad days' were captured in a secondary data analysis of a study that included face-to-face children's interviews. Children also discussed their perceptions of psychiatric disabilities and rehabilitation. Children reported more attention from parents on 'good days.' They expressed concerns about multiple family stressors and bias associated with psychiatric disability. They had little information about psychiatric disabilities and/or rehabilitation. Children recommended 'Get help earlier.' [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite rising rates of youth mental health disorders and suicides, most youth lack access to accurate, non-stigmatized mental health information. Instead, many describe people with mental illness as violent and incompetent. Mental health literacy aligns with resilience theory. It assumes that youth that have accurate mental health information will have less stigmatized views of mental illness and will be more likely to seek help earlier should mental health symptoms arise. Accurate, non-stigmatized mental health information is especially needed for Children of a Parent or other Family Member that has a mental illness (COPFMI) since they are more likely to acquire a mental illness than children who do not have a family member with a mental illness. COPFMI youth are in need of the same mental health information as general population youth but they can also benefit from knowing how to deal with a family member's mental health disorder. Based on many foundation studies and key stakeholder input from parents, educators, mental health providers, child welfare providers, and especially youth, an emerging Youth Mental Health Literacy (YMHL) scale was developed and validated for measuring the mental health literacy levels of youth ages 11-14. The scale provides a full scale score of youth mental health literacy. It has subscales of knowledge of mental illness and recovery; stigma, help seeking for self/others; coping with stress; and dealing with family mental health challenges. The validation study indicated support for a unidimensional structure for each of the refined subscales. The subscales showed suitable reliability as evaluated by several measures of internal consistency. While the scale needs further study with larger samples of youth, it is hoped that the scale can yield mental health literacy outcome data that can help mental health literacy programs to build evidence-based programs that may, in turn, help prevent, delay, or ameliorate mental health disorders among youth., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Riebschleger, Grové, Kelly and Cavanaugh.)

Objective: This review of online mental health resources was conducted to evaluate and document the availability of mental health resources pertinent to the needs of children of parents with a mental illness (COPMI). This review identified available websites and analyzed the appropriateness of content and readability., Methods: We conducted an extensive 6-month review of websites with available mental health literacy content that may be found by COPMI searching for information. Web content was evaluated and described with qualitative thematic analysis techniques. Web content was also evaluated for reading levels using the Flesch-Kincaid readability analysis tool., Results: The researchers described 7 descriptive themes, 10 content areas, and described what information was available across websites and where gaps existed. They also concluded the average reading level of the websites was 9.7, which was substantially higher than current web development recommendations., Conclusions: Websites can be a valuable tool for COPMI without access to direct services. To improve current web resources, developers should strive to offer content specific to the identified needs of COPMI. Additionally, web content should be developed at a level that is accessible to teens and parents.

A program evaluation examined mental health literacy levels and coping outcomes for youth (ages 10-16), before and at the end of their participation in a manualized, school-based mental health literacy program called Youth Education and Support (YES). Most of the youth reportedly had a parent or other family member with a mental health disorder such as depression, anxiety, and/or substance abuse. The mental health literacy levels of program participants from pre to post were evaluated with the developing Knowledge of Mental Illness and Recovery (K-MIR) scale. This scale was validated using item-response theory, demonstrating good psychometric properties. Youth answered two coping questions about their use of positive coping during the program and coping skills compared from pre to post intervention. Findings revealed that youth levels of mental health literacy increased significantly from pre to post program participation. Over 90% of the youth reported an improved use of positive coping strategies from pre to post intervention. The program appeared to deliver enhanced levels of literacy and coping for this sample of youth. The scale appeared to be appropriate to measure youth mental health literacy. Recommendations for practice, policy, and research are offered.

Millions of children have a parent with a mental illness (COPMI). These children are at higher risk of acquiring behavioural, developmental and emotional difficulties. Most children, including COPMI, have low levels of mental health literacy (MHL), meaning they do not have accurate, non-stigmatized information. There is limited knowledge about what kind of MHL content should be delivered to children. The aim of this exploratory study is to identify the knowledge content needed for general population children and COPMI to increase their MHL. A second aim is to explore content for emerging children's MHL scales. Researchers created and analyzed a literature review database. Thematic analysis yielded five main mental health knowledge themes for children: (1) attaining an overview of mental illness and recovery; (2) reducing mental health stigma; (3) building developmental resiliencies; (4) increasing help-seeking capacities; and (5) identifying risk factors for mental illness. COPMI appeared to need the same kind of MHL knowledge content, but with extra family-contextual content such as dealing with stigma experiences, managing stress, and communicating about parental mental illness. There is a need for MHL programs, validated scales, and research on what works for prevention and early intervention with COPMI children., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Objective: This research explores consumer parents' recommendations for developing psychoeducation programs for their minor children., Method: Data were drawn from a purposive sample of 3 focus groups of parent consumers of a community mental health agency. The research question was: "What do consumer parents recommend for developing psychoeducation programs for their minor children?", Results: Parents recommended content foci of mental illness, recovery, heritability, stigma, and coping., Conclusions and Implications for Practice: The next step is youth psychoeducation intervention development and evaluation. Parents, youth, and professionals should be included in the program planning., ((PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).)

Objective: This study reports early findings of a still-developing Youth Education and Support (YES) pilot intervention of multifamily group psychoeducation for youth with a parent with a psychiatric illness., Methods: Hypotheses predicted YES participants would increase pre-to-post: 1) Knowledge of psychiatric illness and recovery, and 2) Coping. A purposive sample of 17 youth, ages 10-16, participated in six lively, activity-focused, two-hour sessions within four groups facilitated by the PI and professionals employed within two public mental health agencies. Data revealed a significant increase in pre-to-post youth-reported knowledge (p= less than .001) and no significant change in overall coping. At post-intervention, youth reported significantly increased use of the coping skills of avoiding problems and relaxing, as indicated within these coping subscales., Conclusions: Study limitations merit interpretation caution. They are useful for future research, including development and testing of youth psychoeducation programs with longer interventions, more emphases on coping, parent-inclusion, and larger samples using randomized, experimental designs. Suggestions for research, practice, and policy are provided.

Seventy-three community mental health professionals read a practice simulation vignette about a man with increased schizophrenia symptoms who appears at a community mental health agency accompanied by his parents. Professionals reported their levels of agreement that the parent/s may play a role in the man's schizophrenia symptoms and/or mental health treatment, i.e., serving as treatment resources; expecting consultation from professionals; serving as partners and allies; expressing negative emotions; expressing double bind communication; engaging in hostile behavior per the schizophrenogenic mother; having marriage conflicts; and also having a psychiatric disability. Professionals reported their level of agreement that the parents may be experiencing responses to their son's schizophrenia such as coping; grieving; adjusting to a biological illness; dealing with caregiving responsibilities/burdens; and remaining strong, resilient people. Findings revealed that this sample of mental health professionals most strongly agreed that families are coping, grieving, and positive treatment resources.

Mental health professionals working at three rural public community mental health agencies were asked for their views on the families of mental health patients. Findings revealed themes that included families as supportive caregivers, as unsupportive agitators, as in pain, as uninformed, and as unequal partners. Implications for clinical intervention, education, and research are discussed.

Twenty siblings of chronically mentally ill people discussed their emotional responses to the mental illness of their brother or sister. The findings were drawn from a study that was part of the author's practice experience as a social worker in a community mental health setting. The findings also paralleled the author's life experiences as a sibling of a chronically mentally ill person. Sibling emotional responses were categorized into grief and loss phases of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, relief/respite, and acceptance. Siblings believed that their expressions of grief and loss were impaired by characteristics of mental illness and by mixed messages from the mental health system. The siblings recommended inclusion of siblings in client treatment; support and education for siblings; clear communication between social worker and family; a social worker focus on family strengths; and, most of all, effective client intervention. The sibling perspective points out the salient need for social workers to use their ecological, person-in-environment training to facilitate healthier family support networks for chronically mentally ill people.