Search

Patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) exhibit remodelling of the lumbar soft tissues such as muscle fatty infiltrations (MFI) and fibrosis of the lumbar multifidus (LuM) muscles, thickness changes of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and perimuscular connective tissues (PMCT) surrounding the abdominal lateral wall muscles. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) parameters such as thickness and echogenicity are sensitive to this remodelling. This experimental laboratory study aimed to explore whether these RUSI parameters (LuM echogenicity and fascia thicknesses), hereafter called dependent variables (DV) were linked to independent variables (IV) such as (1) other RUSI parameters (trunk muscle thickness and activation) and (2) physical and psychological measures. RUSI measures, as well as a clinical examination comprising physical tests and psychological questionnaires, were collected from 70 participants with LBP. The following RUSI dependent variables (RUSI-DV), measures of passive tissues were performed bilaterally: (1) LuM echogenicity (MFI/fibrosis) at three vertebral levels (L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1); (2) TLF posterior layer thickness, and (3) PMCT thickness of the fasciae between subcutaneous tissue thickness (STT) and external oblique (PMCT

Purpose: The authors sought to determine the interrater reliability among novice raters of intra-vaginal manual assessment of pubococcygeus muscle tone in women using the Reissing tone scale (RTS). Method: Three graduating physiotherapy students (novice raters) and one experienced pelvic floor physiotherapist assessed 31 female participants (aged 20–66 y). Assessors gave RTS scores for pubococcygeus tone at three intra-vaginal locations (6:00, 9:00, and 3:00). Interrater reliability was determined for the novice raters using a two-way random single-measures absolute agreement intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Spearman rank correlation (SRC) analysis determined the correlation between the novice and expert scores. Results: The ICC values for the novice raters were 0.523, 0.274, and 0.336 at 6:00, 9:00, and 3:00, and the SRC values between the novice and expert raters were 0.580, 0.320, and 0.340. Conclusions: The novice raters demonstrated low to moderate interrater reliability for intra-vaginal manual assessment of pubococcygeus tone. This result indicates that manual assessment of pelvic floor muscle tone is not reliable enough to use as a stand-alone test to guide treatment, at least for physiotherapists with limited clinical experience.

With low back pain (LBP), remodelling of the lumbar soft tissues involves both trunk muscles and neighbouring passive connective tissues. The aim of the present study was to compare three quantitative measures of these tissues, using ultrasound imaging (USI), among healthy controls and individuals with LBP.USI measures from 30 healthy subjects and 34 patients with non-acute LBP were compared between groups and sexes. The measures employed were (1) lumbar multifidus echogenicity (fatty/fibrosis infiltration) at three vertebral levels; (2) posterior layer thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia, and (3) thickness of the perimuscular tissues surrounding the external oblique, internal oblique and transversus abdominis (TrA).USI measures of (1) multifidus echogenicity showed statistically significant changes between vertebral levels and sexes (females males; p = 0.02); (2) differences in thoracolumbar fascia thickness approached statistical significance between groups (LBP controls; p = 0.09) and sexes (femalesmales; p = 0.07); and (3) perimuscular tissue surrounding the TrA was significantly thinner (p ≤ 0.001) in patients with LBP compared to controls.The thinner perimuscular tissues surrounding the TrA in patients with LBP is a new finding, concurring with previous findings with regard to the lower activation of this deep muscle as well as more recent findings on other perimuscular tissue.Overall, USI measures were sensitive to different potential changes (pain status, sex, vertebral level), and this is useful in studying the remodelling of various soft tissues of the trunk.

Low back pain (LBP) remains one of the most common and incapacitating health conditions worldwide. Clinical guidelines recommend exercise programs after the acute phase, but clinical effects are modest when assessed at a population level. Research needs to determine who is likely to benefit from specific exercise interventions, based on clinical presentation. This study aimed to derive clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for treatment success, using a lumbar stabilization exercise program (LSEP), at the end of treatment and at six-month follow-up. The eight-week LSEP, including clinical sessions and home exercises, was completed by 110 participants with non-acute LBP, with 100 retained at the six-month follow-up. Physical (lumbar segmental instability, motor control impairments, posture and range of motion, trunk muscle endurance and physical performance tests) and psychological (related to fear-avoidance and home-exercise adherence) measures were collected at a baseline clinical exam. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict clinical success, as defined by ≥50% decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index. CPRs were derived for success at program completion (T8) and six-month follow-up (T34), negotiating between predictive ability and clinical usability. The chosen CPRs contained four (T8) and three (T34) clinical tests, all theoretically related to spinal instability, making these CPRs specific to the treatment provided (LSEP). The chosen CPRs provided a positive likelihood ratio of 17.9 (T8) and 8.2 (T34), when two or more tests were positive. When applying these CPRs, the probability of treatment success rose from 49% to 96% at T8 and from 53% to 92% at T34. These results support the further development of these CPRs by proceeding to the validation stage.

Background: Femoral nerve block (FNB) and adductor canal block (ACB) have been used increasingly for pain control during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in adolescent patients. However, recent evidence suggests that the use of FNB may affect quadriceps strength recovery 6 months after surgery. Purpose/Hypothesis: To compare postoperative isokinetic strength in adolescents who received FNB, ACB, or no block for perioperative analgesia during ACL reconstruction. We anticipated lower postoperative quadriceps and hamstring isokinetic deficits in adolescents who received FNB as compared with ACB. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients were included in the study if they had undergone hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon from July 2008 to January 2018 and if they underwent isokinetic muscle testing at 4 to 8 months postoperatively. The participants were divided into 3 groups (no block, FNB, and ACB), and we compared the deficit in percentages between the affected and unaffected limbs as calculated from the isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength testing at 60 and 180 deg/s. Between-group analysis was performed using analysis of variance, with an alpha of .05. Results: A total of 98 participants were included in the analysis (31 no block, 36 FNB, and 31 ACB). The mean ± SD age of the patients was 15.26 ± 1.15, 15.50 ± 1.42, and 15.71 ± 1.44, for no block, FNB, and ACB, respectively. At 5.61 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference across the 3 groups in isokinetic quadriceps deficits ( P ≥ .99), and the only significant difference in isokinetic hamstring deficit was observed for peak flexion at 180 deg/s, in which the ACB group had lower peak torque than the FNB group (–9.80% ± 3.48% vs 2.37% ± 3.23%; P = .035). The ratio of participants with a deficit exceeding 15% did not differ significantly among the 3 groups. Conclusion: Contrary to previous research, our findings indicate only minimal difference in quadriceps strength among the 3 types of perioperative analgesia in adolescents approximately 6 months after ACL reconstruction. The only significant strength deficit was seen in the hamstrings of patients receiving ACB at peak flexion as compared with those receiving FNB.

Background Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEPs) act positively on clinical outcome measures in patients with low back pain (LBP), but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Among the various neuromuscular mechanisms, a good candidate is better activation of the abdominal wall, as measured with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). Objectives To determine whether RUSI measures are (1) sensitive to LBP status and treatment (LSEP) and (2) correlate with clinical outcomes following the LSEP. Design An exploratory one-arm clinical trial with healthy participants as a control group. Setting LSEP was delivered in a clinical setting; outcomes were measured in a laboratory setting. Participants Thirty-one patients with nonacute LBP and 30 healthy controls. Methods Outcome measures were performed before and after an 8-week LSEP in patients with LBP, and with the same time interval for control participants to compare with patients at baseline. Main outcome measurements Pain, disability, as well as static (at rest) and dynamic (percent thickness change) RUSI measures for abdominal muscles (transversus abdominis, internal oblique [IO], and external oblique [EO]). Results Patients did not produce systematic changes in RUSI measures relative to controls, even if patients had significant improvement in pain and disability. However, the correlational analyses between the absolute change (pre- to post-LSEP) (1) of EO and IO thickness (in mm) at rest (bilaterally), and (2) in pain following the LSEP were significant and consistent (range: .36-.45) in patients. Conclusions Although positive clinical improvements were observed following LSEP, there were minimal systematic changes in RUSI measures, likely because patients were not different from controls at baseline. Correlational analyses, however, indicated that greater reductions in pain were associated with reduced thickness of the EO and IO following the LSEP, suggesting the presence of some heterogeneity (or clinical subgroups) among the patients. Level of evidence II.

Recently remodeling of lumbar soft tissues has received increased research attention. However, the major determinants that influence remodeling need to be elucidated in order to understand the impact of different rehabilitation modalities on tissue remodeling. The main aim of this study was to explore the between-subject variance of different measures of lumbar soft tissues quantified with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). RUSI measures (n = 8) were collected from 30 subjects without and 34 patients with LBP: (1) lumbar multifidus (LM) echogenicity (fatty infiltration/fibrosis) at three vertebral levels (L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1) (n = 3); (2) posterior layer thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia (n = 1); and (3) thickness of the fasciae surrounding the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and transversus abdominis (TrA) (n = 4). Forward stepwise multivariate regression modeling was conducted with these RUSI measures as dependent variables, using the following independent variables as potential determinants: age, sex, the presence of LBP, body size/composition characteristics (height, weight, trunk length, subcutaneous tissue thickness over the abdominal, and LM muscles), trunk muscle function (or activation) as determined with the percent thickness change of LM, EO, IO, and TrA muscles during a standardized effort (RUSI measures), and physical activity level during sport and leisure activities as estimated with a self-report questionnaire. Two or three statistically significant predictors (or determinants) were selected in the regression model of each RUSI measure (n = 8 models), accounting for 26-64% of their total variance. The subcutaneous tissue thickness on the back accounted for 15-30% variance of LM echogenicity measures and thoracolumbar fascia thickness while the subcutaneous tissue thickness over the abdominals accounted for up to 42% variance of the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissues and the EO muscle. The thickness of IO at rest accounted for 13-21% variance of all investigated abdominal fasciae except the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissue and EO. Pain status accounted for 13-18% variance of the anterior and posterior fasciae of the TrA. Age accounted for 11-14% variance of LM echogenicity at all investigated vertebral levels while sex accounted for 15-21% variance of LM echogenicity at L3/L4 and fascia separating subcutaneous adipose tissue and EO muscle. The function (or activation) of EO and LM at L3/L4 accounted for 8-11% variance of the thoracolumbar fascia and fascia separating TrA and intra-abdominal content (TrA posterior fascia), respectively. Finally, the physical activity level during sport activities accounted for 7% variance of the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissues and the EO muscle. These findings suggest that determinants other than body size characteristics may impact the remodeling of lumbar soft tissues, more importantly the subcutaneous adipose tissue deposits (thickness RUSI measures), which are associated with ectopic fat deposition in the LM and in the fasciae that are more closely positioned to the surface. While age, sex, and pain status explain some variability, modifiable factors such as physical activity level as well as trunk muscle thickness and function were involved. Overall, these results suggest that rehabilitation can potentially impact tissue remodeling, particularly in terms of intramuscular and perimuscular adipose tissues.

Introduction Growing interest is being paid to the lumbar multifidus (LM) intramuscular fatty infiltrations and fibrosis that are secondary to low back pain as well to the remodeling of perimuscular connective tissues (fasciae) such as the thoracolumbar fascia and fascia sheets separating the abdominal wall muscles. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography have traditionally been used but rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) is much more affordable and practical, which can accelerate research and clinical applications on this topic. The aim of this study was to test the medium-term (8 weeks) test-retest reliability of the corresponding RUSI measures. Methods Thirty-four participants with non-acute LBP and 30 healthy controls performed a RUSI assessment before and after an 8-week time interval. LM echogenicity was quantified to assess fatty infiltrations and fibrosis while fasciae were quantified with thickness measures. Relative and absolute reliability were estimated using the generalizability theory as a framework, allowing to partition the different sources of error. Results Overall, the reliability findings were quite acceptable, with negligible systematic effects. Excellent relative reliability was reached in half of the investigated RUSI measures, particularly when averaging measures across trials. However, neither relative, nor absolute reliability results support the use of these RUSI measurements on an individual basis (e.g. clinical applications) but they are useful on a group basis (e.g. research applications). Discussion The different sources of error were distributed unequally across RUSI measures, pointing to different measurement strategies to mitigate the underlying errors. Conclusions The use of the generalizability theory allowed identifying the sources of error of the different RUSI measures. For each category of measure, depending of the distribution of errors, it was possible to recommend specific measurement strategies to mitigate them.

Low back pain (LBP) has been previously associated with delayed anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) determined by trunk muscle activation. Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEP) for patients with LBP may restore the trunk neuromuscular control of the lumbar spine, and normalize APAs. This exploratory study aimed at testing the reliability of EMG and kinematics-based postural adjustment measures over an 8-week interval, assessing their sensitivity to LBP status and treatment and examining their relationship with clinical outcomes.Muscle activation of 10 trunk muscles, using surface electromyography (EMG), and lumbar angular kinematics were recorded during a rapid arm-raising/lowering task. Patients with LBP were tested before and after an 8-week LSEP. Healthy controls receiving no treatment were assessed over the same interval to determine the reliability of the measures and act as a control group at baseline. Muscle activation onsets and reactive range of motion, range of velocities and accelerations were assessed for between group differences at baseline and pre- to post-treatment effects within patients with LBP using t-tests. Correlations between these dependent variables and the change of clinical outcomes (pain, disability) over treatment were also explored.Kinematic-based measures showed comparable reliability to EMG-based measures. Between-group differences were found in lumbar lateral flexion ROM at baseline (patients controls). In the patients with LBP, lateral flexion velocity and acceleration significantly increased following the LSEP. Correlational analyses revealed that lumbar angular kinematics were more sensitive to changes in pain intensity following the LSEP compared to EMG measures. These findings are interpreted in from the perspective of guarding behaviors and lumbar stability hypotheses.Future clinical trials are needed to target patients with and without delayed APAs at baseline and to explore the sensitivity of different outcome measures related to APAs. Different tasks more challenging to postural stability may need to be explored to more effectively reveal APA dysfunction.

Background Motion assessment of the body’s head-arms-trunk (HAT) using linked-segment models, along with an inverse dynamics approach, can enable in vivo estimations of inter-vertebral moments. However, this mathematical approach is prone to experimental errors because of inaccuracies in (i) kinematic measurements associated with soft tissue artifacts and (ii) estimating individual-specific body segment parameters (BSPs). The inaccuracy of the BSPs is particularly challenging for the multi-segment HAT due to high inter-participant variability in the HAT’s BSPs and no study currently exists that can provide a less erroneous estimation of the joint moments along the spinal column. Research question This study characterized three-dimensional (3D) inter-segmental moments in a multi-segment HAT model during multi-directional trunk-bending, after minimizing the experimental errors. Method Eleven healthy individuals participated in a multi-directional trunk-bending experiment in five directions with three speeds. A seven-segment HAT model was reconstructed for each participant, and its motion was recorded. After compensating for experimental errors due to soft tissue artifacts, and using optimized individual-specific BSPs, and center of pressure offsets, the inter-segmental moments were calculated via inverse dynamics. Results Our results show a significant effect of the inter-segmental level and trunk-bending directions on the obtained moments. Compensating for soft tissue artifacts contributed significantly to reducing errors. Our results indicate complex, task-specific patterns of the 3D moments, with high inter-participant variability at different inter-segmental levels, which cannot be studied using single-segment models or without error compensation. Significance Interpretation of inter-segmental moments after compensation of experimental errors is important for clinical evaluations and developing injury prevention and rehabilitation strategies.

Study Design Literature review with meta-analysis. Background The McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT), a classification-based system, was designed to classify patients into homogeneous subgroups to direct treatment. Objectives To examine the effectiveness of MDT for improving pain and disability in patients with either acute (less than 12 weeks in duration) or chronic (greater than 12 weeks in duration) low back pain (LBP). Methods Randomized controlled trials examining MDT in patients with LBP were identified from 6 databases. Independent investigators assessed the studies for exclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval were calculated to compare the effects of MDT to those of other interventions in patients with acute or chronic LBP. Results Of the 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 11 yielded valid data for analysis. In patients with acute LBP, there was no significant difference in pain resolution (P = .11) and disability (P = .61) between MDT and other interventions. In patients with chronic LBP, there was a significant difference in disability (SMD, -0.45), with results favoring MDT compared to exercise alone. There were no significant differences between MDT and manual therapy plus exercise (P>.05) for pain and disability outcomes. Conclusion There is moderate- to high-quality evidence that MDT is not superior to other rehabilitation interventions for reducing pain and disability in patients with acute LBP. In patients with chronic LBP, there is moderate- to high-quality evidence that MDT is superior to other rehabilitation interventions for reducing pain and disability; however, this depends on the type of intervention being compared to MDT. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1a. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(6):476-490. Epub 30 Mar 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7562.

Background Wearing a lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) is known to influence spine mechanics, but less is known about how LSOs affect motor control. Whether the use of a LSO can negatively affect motor control of the lumbar spine is still under debate. Objective The current study examined the immediate effects of two flexible LSOs (extensible and non-extensible) on the anticipatory postural adjustments that prepare the spine for a predictable perturbation. Design A comparative study using a repeated measures design in a laboratory setting. Methods Healthy controls (n = 20) and participants with low back pain (n = 40) performed a rapid arm flexion/extension cycle with and without these LSOs. The latency between the activations of the shoulder and different back (iliocostalis lumborum) and abdominal (rectus abdominis, internal and external obliques) muscles, as measured with surface electromyography, was used as the outcome. Results The effects, which were comparable between groups and between LSOs, were mixed, with some muscles showing significantly (p ˂ 0.05) earlier activation and others showing delayed activation with the use of a LSO, relative to the control condition. The corresponding effect sizes were low to average (Hedges's g range: 0.17–0.48). Conclusions These findings suggest a change in the motor program before task initiation, which might be generalizable to other activities of daily living or work. However, none of the effects were large, making it difficult to provide clear conclusions with regard to their clinical relevance. It remains to be tested whether these immediate adaptations in motor planning can induce long term detrimental effects to the control of lumbar stability.

Disturbances to balance arising from forces applied to the upper limb have received relatively little attention compared to disturbances arising from support surface perturbations. In this study we applied fast ramp perturbations to the hand in anterior, posterior, medial and lateral directions. The effects of perturbation predictability and amplitude on the postural response of upper limb, trunk and lower limb muscles were investigated. Perturbations were applied either in blocks of constant amplitude and direction (predictable) or with direction and amplitude varying randomly (random) from trial to trial. The spatial-temporal patterns of anticipatory muscle activation under the predictable condition and the reactionary responses following the perturbation under both conditions were similarly organized. The size of the response increased systematically with the perturbation magnitude for both anticipatory and reactionary changes in muscle activation. However, the slope of the relation between perturbation amplitude and the magnitude of the change in muscle activation was greater when perturbations were predictable than when they were randomly selected. The timing of both the anticipatory and reactionary increases in muscle activation was invariant across perturbation amplitudes. The characteristics of the reactionary responses have a similar organization to the long latency muscle responses to support surface perturbations.

Objective The study tested whether combining repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (RPMS) and motor training of the superficial multifidus muscle (MF) better improved the corticomotor control of spine than training alone in chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods Twenty-one participants with CLBP were randomly allocated to [RPMS + training] and [Sham + training] groups for three sessions (S1–S3) over a week where MF was stimulated before training (volitional contraction). Training was also home-practiced twice a day. Changes were tested at S1 and S3 for anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) of MF and semi-tendinosus (ST), MF EMG activation, cortical motor plasticity (transcranial magnetic stimulation) and pain/disability. Results The RPMS group showed immediate decrease of pain at S1, then improvement of MF activation, ST APA, M1 facilitation, and pain/disability at S3. Changes were larger when brain excitability was lower at baseline. Disability index remained improved one month later. Conclusions Combining RPMS with training of MF in CLBP impacted motor planning, MF and lumbopelvic spine motor control and pain/disability one week after the onset of protocol. Brain plasticity might have favoured motor learning and improved daily lumbopelvic spine control without pain generation. Significance Clinically, RPMS impacted the function by improving the gains beyond those reached by training alone in CLBP.

Hemispheric lateralization of pain processing was reported with overactivation of the right frontal lobe. Specifically in chronic low back pain (CLBP), functional changes in the left primary motor cortex (M1) with impaired anticipatory postural activation (APA) of trunk muscles have been observed. Given the connections between frontal and M1 areas for motor planning, it is hypothesized that the pain side could differently influence M1 function and APA of paravertebral multifidus (MF) muscles. This study aimed at testing whether people with right- versus left-sided CLBP showed different M1 excitability and APA. Thirty-five individuals with lateralized CLBP (19 right-sided and 16 left-sided) and 13 pain-free subjects (normative values) were tested for the excitability of MF M1 area (active motor threshold-AMT) with transcranial magnetic stimulation and for the latency of MF APA during bilateral shoulder flexion and during unilateral hip extension in prone lying. In the right-sided CLBP group, the AMT of both M1 areas was lower than in the left-sided group and the pain-free subjects; the latency of MF APA was shorter in bilateral shoulder flexion and in the left hip extension tasks as compared to the left-sided group. In CLBP, an earlier MF APA was correlated with lower AMT in both tasks. People with right-sided CLBP presented with increased M1 excitability in both hemispheres and earlier MF APA. These results likely rely on cortical motor adaptation related to the tasks and axial muscles tested. Future studies should investigate whether CLBP side-related differences have a clinical impact, e.g. in diagnosis and intervention.

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) and fear of movement (kinesiophobia) are associated with an overactivation of paravertebral muscles during forward bending. This impairs spine motor control and contributes to pain perpetuation. However, the abdominal muscles activation is engaged too in spine stabilization but its modulation with kinesiophobia remains unknown. Our study tested whether CLBP and kinesiophobia affected the activation pattern of abdominal muscles during trunk flexion/extension. Methods: Surface electromyographical recordings of the internal oblique/transversus abdominis (IO/TrA) and external oblique (EO) muscles were analyzed in 12 people with CLBP and 13 pain-free subjects during low-velocity forward bending back and forth from erected posture. Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia was also administrated. Results: IO/TrA activation, but not EO, was modulated across the phases of movement in both groups, i.e. maximal at onset of flexion and end of extension, and minimal at full flexion. In CLBP group only, IO/TrA activation was increased near to full trunk flexion and in correlation with kinesiophobia. Conclusions: The phase-dependence of IO/TrA activation during trunk flexion/extension in standing may have a role in spine motor control. The influence of kinesiophobia in CLBP should be further investigated as an important target in CLBP management.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is often associated with impaired control of deep trunk muscles and reorganization of the primary motor areas (M1). Precisely, functional changes of the lumbar multifidus muscles (MF) involved in spine stability may be of special interest in rehabilitation. Therefore, we tested MF corticomotor control using double transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigms for the first time in this muscle and examined its link with MF volitional activation. Eleven individuals with lateralized CLBP and 13 pain-free participants were recruited. Ultrasound imaging enabled measurement of MF volitional isometric contraction in prone lying. TMS of MF M1 area was used to test hemispheric excitability and mechanisms in relation to motor programming, i.e., active motor threshold (AMT), amplitude of motor-evoked potentials and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF). In CLBP, SICI level was lower in the left hemisphere and MF volitional contraction was not related to AMT (M1 excitability), conversely to what was observed in the pain-free group. No other between-group difference was detected. These original findings support a plasticity of cortical maps controlling paravertebral muscles and likely including a different motor strategy for the control of MF. Changes of M1 function may thus underlie impaired motor control of lumbopelvic spine and pain persistence in CLBP.

The aim of this study was to test whether determinants associated with lumbar stability can predict performance during unstable sitting (trunk postural control - TPC). If confirmed, unstable sitting could be viewed as a proxy measure for these determinants. Wobbling chair motion was measured in 58 subjects with an inertial sensor, and six outcomes were computed (mean frequency and velocity, frequency dispersion, two variables from the sway density analysis and Lyapunov exponent - short interval) to represent TPC performance. Subjects also performed five other trunk neuromuscular tests to quantify the thickness of back and abdominal muscles and connective tissues, lumbar proprioception, lumbar stiffness, feedforward and feedback control mechanisms, and trunk/muscle coordination. Four to five predictors explained between 36 and 47% of TPC outcomes variance, as determined with multivariate analyses. These predictors were mainly related to (1) angular kinematic parameters of the pelvis or lumbar spine following rapid arm movement, (2) lumbar intrinsic stiffness, (3) thickness of perimuscular connective tissues surrounding specific abdominal muscles, (4) activation onsets of specific trunk muscles (IO/TrA and iliocostalis lumborum) before rapid arm movement, and (5) percent thickness change of internal oblique (IO) and transversus abdominis (TrA) muscles. Lumbar proprioception and reflex responses were not predictive, possibly due to the lack of appropriate measurements. These findings support the use of TPC in unstable sitting as a proxy measure for determinants associated with lumbar stability. This might be useful in research and clinical settings, considering time and equipment constraints associated with measuring these determinants individually.

Background Previous findings suggest that wearing a lumbar belt may benefit some patients with low back pain; however, the mechanisms of action are not yet fully understood. Research question The effect of wearing two flexible (extensible and non-extensible) lumbar belts on trunk postural control was investigated during an unstable sitting task. Methods Healthy subjects and subjects with LBP sat on a wobbling chair, with and without the lumbar belts. Chair rotation was measured in the sagittal and frontal planes, and 10 linear and nonlinear measures of balance were computed to assess the quantity (3 measures) and quality (7 measures) of the movements. Results Both lumbar belts induced similar changes in specific measures of trunk postural control, for both subject groups, generally indicative of more instability and less controllability, but with low effect sizes (0.14 and 0.40). Subjects with LBP also showed lower entropy (complexity; effect size 0.93) and higher determinism (predictability; effect size 0.56) than healthy controls, under all test conditions. These findings indicate that the subjects with LBP used a less complex, more predictable trunk postural control strategy, suggestive of impaired adaptability and responsiveness to dynamic trunk postural control demands. The findings also suggest other factors related to dynamic adaptability may be impaired by lumbar belt use. Significance The effects of the lumbar belts on trunk postural control were small, however, their practical implications for the management of LBP remain to be determined in relation to other effects of lumbar belts (e.g. increased mechanical stiffness).

Kinetics assessment of the human head-arms-trunk (HAT) complex via a multisegment model is a useful tool for objective clinical evaluation of several pathological conditions. Inaccuracies in body segment parameters (BSPs) are a major source of uncertainty in the estimation of the joint moments associated with the multisegment HAT. Given the large intersubject variability, there is currently no comprehensive database for the estimation of BSPs for the HAT. We propose a nonlinear, multistep, optimization-based, noninvasive method for estimating individual-specific BSPs and calculating joint moments in a multisegment HAT model. Eleven nondisabled individuals participated in a trunk-bending experiment and their body motion was recorded using cameras and a force plate. A seven-segment model of the HAT was reconstructed for each participant. An initial guess of the BSPs was obtained by individual-specific scaling of the BSPs calculated from the male visible human (MVH) images. The intersegmental moments were calculated using both bottom-up and top-down inverse dynamics approaches. Our proposed method adjusted the scaled BSPs and center of pressure (COP) offsets to estimate optimal individual-specific BSPs that minimize the difference between the moments obtained by top-down and bottom-up inverse dynamics approaches. Our results indicate that the proposed method reduced the error in the net joint moment estimation (defined as the difference between the net joint moment calculated via bottom-up and top-down approaches) by 79.3% (median among participants). Our proposed method enables an optimized estimation of individual-specific BSPs and, consequently, a less erroneous assessment of the three-dimensional (3D) kinetics of a multisegment HAT model.

Background Differences in movement variability may be related to a guarded response to pain or a less robust movement pattern, indicating a potential dysfunction in motor control. The study objective was to compare patterns of lumbo-pelvic coordinative variability, during repeated sit-to-stand-to-sit, in individuals with low back pain and healthy adults. Methods Participants were adults with low back pain (n = 16) and healthy controls (n = 21). Kinematics for the T12-L3, L3-S1, and hip segments were measured using electromagnetic motion capture during 10 sit-to-stand-to-sit trials. Continuous relative phase analysis using the Hilbert transform method determined coordination and variability of the Hip-L3S1, and L3S1-T12L3 segments, deconstructed into 4 periods (start/up/down/end). T-tests compared coordination and variability of the full task between groups, and a mixed ANOVA compared the effects of group and period for the two segments. Findings Across the full task, the low back pain group demonstrated more variable (mean difference = −6.95, 95% CI = −12.3 to −1.59) and greater out-of-phase behavior (mean difference = −22.6, 95% CI = −39.1 to −6.03) in the LHip-L3S1 segment. Group-period interaction effects revealed greater variability in the start period (mean difference = −0.325, 95% CI = −0.493 to −0.156) and more out-of-phase behavior in the start (mean difference = −0.350, 95% CI = −0.549 to −0.150) and end (mean difference = −0.354, 95% CI = −0.602 to −0.105) periods for the LHip-L3S1 segment. Interpretation Excessive variability may relate to reports of poor spinal proprioception in low back pain; however, based on our sample characteristics (low pain and disability) and lack of symptoms during the task, classifying our findings as dysfunctional may not be fully warranted.

Background Patients with knee osteoarthritis often present with varus thrust and muscular co-contraction during gait. It is unclear if these adaptations are related. The objective was to examine the relationship between muscle co-contraction and varus thrust during gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis and to determine if these relationships are modulated by disease severity or history of knee ligament rupture. Methods Participants (n = 42, 23 women, mean age 58 years) with knee osteoarthritis completed gait trials at self-selected speeds. Varus thrust was measured with an eight camera motion capture system sampled at 100 Hz. Co-contraction ratios were measured with surface electromyography sampled at 2000 Hz over the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius. Disease severity was measured on radiographs and history of anterior cruciate ligament rupture was confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging. Linear regression analyses examined the relationship between varus thrust and co-contraction ratios after controlling for radiographic disease severity and history of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Findings Higher vastus lateralis–lateral hamstring (b = 0.081, P 0.05). Radiographic disease severity or history of anterior cruciate ligament injury did not significantly contribute to regression models. Interpretation Greater quadriceps-hamstring co-contraction is associated with greater varus thrust in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Potential explanations include increased co-contraction may provide stability or there is a proprioceptive reflex that is independent of any stabilizing role. Research is needed to test these hypotheses.

Purpose: To identify factors affecting length of stay (LOS) for adults participating in outpatient physical or occupational therapy programmes. Method: A scoping review of the literature was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and Cochrane Library databases. Results: A total of 19 articles were retained from the search, and 2 additional articles were retrieved from grey literature (i.e., non-published sources). Personal factors affecting LOS are age and sex, both of which had inconsistent effects on LOS, and communication, language, physical, and cognitive difficulties, for which higher levels of function were generally associated with shorter LOS. Institutional factors affecting LOS were location, interdisciplinary communication, number of disciplines involved, and type of rehabilitation setting. Finally, two clinician-related factors—fewer treatment goals and a selection of evidence-informed treatment techniques—were associated with shorter LOS. Conclusions: Research on factors affecting adult outpatient rehabilitation LOS is limited and inconsistent. A preliminary list of LOS factors was produced, but this topic should be further explored with the collaboration of researchers and clinical institutions.

Study design Cross-sectional study of lumbopelvic muscle activation during rapid limb movements in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients and healthy controls. Introduction Controversy exists over whether bilateral anticipatory activation of the deep abdominal muscles represents a normal motor control strategy prior to all rapid limb movements, or if this is simply a task-specific strategy appropriate for only certain movement conditions. Objective To assess the onset timing of the transversus abdominis/internal oblique muscles (TrA/IO) during two rapid limb movement tasks with different postural demands – bilateral shoulder flexion in standing, unilateral hip extension in prone lying – as well as differences between CLBP and controls. Methods Twelve CLBP and 13 controls performed the two tasks in response to an auditory cue. Surface EMG was acquired bilaterally from five muscles, including TrA/IO. Results In both groups, 50% of bilateral shoulder flexion trials showed bilateral anticipatory TrA/IO activation. This was rare, however, in unilateral hip extension for which only the TrA/IO contralateral to the moving leg showed anticipatory activation. The only significant difference in lumbo-pelvic muscle onset timing between CLBP and controls was a delay in semitendinosus activation during bilateral shoulder flexion in standing. Conclusion Our data suggest that bilateral anticipatory TrA/IO activation is a task-specific motor control strategy, appropriate for only certain rapid limb movement conditions. Furthermore, the presence of altered semitendinosus onset timing in the CLBP group during bilateral shoulder flexion may be reflective of other possible lumbo-pelvic motor control alterations among this population.

Lumbar stabilization programs reduce pain and disability, but the mechanisms of action underlying this treatment are unknown. Trunk postural control during unstable sitting represents a surrogate measure of motor control mechanisms involved to maintain the dynamic stability of the spine. This exploratory study aimed to determine the reliability of trunk postural control measures over an 8-week interval, their sensitivity to low back pain status and treatment and their relationship with clinical outcomes. Trunk postural control measures were determined in patients with low back pain before and after an 8-week lumbar stabilization exercise program. Healthy controls were assessed over the same interval, but without any treatment, to determine the reliability of the measures and act as a control group at baseline. The kinematics of a wobble chair during unstable sitting was summarized using different linear and nonlinear measures quantifying the quantity and quality of movement, respectively. The reliability of the measures was moderate to excellent. The results showed significant reduction in pain and disability following the intervention. While no impairment at baseline scores was found, some linear and nonlinear measures changed over the intervention period among the patient group. However, for nonlinear measures only, significant correlations were detected with the change scores of pain and disability. The change of measures over the intervention period was likely due to learning rather than the intervention as similar alteration was detected in the healthy subjects. The results suggest that only the quality (not the quantity) of movement may have relationship with pain and disability.

Workers with low back pain (LBP) may benefit from wearing a lumbar belt (LB), but the biomechanical and psychological mechanisms involved are not fully understood. Two types of flexible LB (extensible and non-extensible) were compared to a control condition (no LB) regarding pain-related (pain, fear of pain and catastrophizing) and biomechanical (range of motion - ROM) outcomes related to two tasks: maximal trunk flexion-extension and manual material handling. Healthy controls and participants with LBP were tested. During both tasks, the two LBs reduced the lumbar ROM in participants with LBP in the same way as healthy controls. This was observed even at the beginning of the trunk flexion movement, allowing generalization to many work tasks, that is to say tasks performed with small or deep trunk flexion. The two LBs reduced pain, fear of pain and catastrophizing in subjects with LBP. That may help a gradual re-exposure to physical work activities (disability prevention perspective), or maintaining these activities (secondary prevention perspective), following a LBP episode.

A number of studies have shown that sensory inputs from the hand can have a profound effect in stabilizing upright posture. This suggests that the central nervous system can extract information about body motion and external forces acting on the body from cutaneous sensory signals. We have recently shown that the central nervous system determines the direction of an unpredictable force applied to the hand so rapidly that it is able to activate ankle muscles in advance of the perturbing effect that this force has at the ankles. In this study we investigate whether this rapid change in activation of lower limb muscles is an invariant response determined by the pattern of somatosensory information arising from sensory receptors in the hand or whether it adapts to changes in postural stability. We manipulated lateral stability of upright stance by changing stance width which had no effect on the activation of upper limb muscles or hand kinematics, but produced profound changes in the activation patterns of lower limb muscles when perturbations were in the medial/lateral direction without affecting the activation patterns of muscles when perturbations were in the anterior/posterior direction.

Background Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEP) produce positive effects on clinical outcomes, but the underlying mechanisms remain relatively unexplored. Psychological and neuromuscular mechanisms can be involved, such as a better activation of the lumbar multifidus, which represents one possibility. Objectives To determine the following: (1) the effect of an LSEP on lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and activation, as measured with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI), in patients with low back pain (LBP); (2) the correlation between RUSI measures and any change in clinical outcomes following the LSEP; and (3) the reliability of RUSI measures in control subjects over 8 weeks. Design One-arm clinical trial with healthy subjects as a control group; reliability study. Setting LSEP delivered in a clinical setting; outcomes measured in a laboratory setting. Participants A total of 34 patients with nonacute LBP and 28 healthy control subjects. Methods Outcomes were measured before and after an 8-week LSEP in patients with LBP, and at the same time interval (without treatment, to assess reliability) in control subjects. Main Outcome Measurements Pain numeric rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index (function), as well as RUSI measures for the lumbar multifidus (LM) muscles at 3 vertebral levels (L5-S1, L4-5, and L3-4) during rest (static) and dynamic contractions (percent thickness change). Results Patients did not show systematic changes in RUSI measures relative to controls, even though RUSI impairments were observed at baseline (dynamic measure at L5-S1) and even though patients had significant improvements in pain and disability. Correlational analyses with these clinical outcomes suggested that patients had reduced muscle thickness at baseline that was associated with a greater reduction in disability following LSEP; however, LM activation measured at baseline showed the opposite. Static RUSI measures showed excellent reliability at the L4-5 and L3-4 levels, whereas dynamic measures were not reliable. Conclusions Patients showed less muscle activation than controls at baseline (L5-S1 level), but the LSEP did not normalize this impairment. The links between RUSI measures and the change in clinical outcomes during LSEP should be further explored. This clinical trial has been recorded in the International Standard Registered Clinical/soCial sTudy Number (ISRCTN) registry (ID: ISRCTN94152969). Level of Evidence II

Background Lumbar stabilization exercise programs should normalize the aberrant movements patterns often observed in patients with low back pain. This study aimed to determine the effect of an 8-week lumbar stabilization program on EMG/kinematics measures of the aberrant movement patterns in such patients. A secondary goal was to assess the 8-week test-retest reliability of these measures. Methods The patients followed an 8-week lumbar stabilization program while no intervention was carried out on the controls. Before and after this period, kinematics of the spine along with the EMG of paraspinal muscles were recorded during trunk maximal flexion-extension. ANOVAs tested the effect of the intervention in the patients, relative to the controls. Within the patients, correlation of the EMG/kinematics measures with the change in disability and pain following the intervention was investigated. Findings A significant reduction in pain (Hedges's g effect size = 2.31) and improvement in function (g = 1.74) was reported in the patients. While EMG/kinematics measures disclosed impairments in the patients at baseline compared to the controls, no change was observed over the intervention. Nevertheless, the change of lumbar range of motion was positively correlated (r = 0.42; P = 0.015) with the change in disability. Interpretation Although pain and disability decreased following the intervention, the EMG/kinematics measures did not change concomitantly suggesting that the patients learned to stiffen the lumbar spine during the treatment, and this technique was applied even if pain and disability unequivocally decreased after the treatment, which would not necessarily be beneficial to the patient.

When the arm of a standing human is perturbed in an unpredictable direction, postural muscles are activated at latencies as short as 50-110ms. While the motion of the body clearly progresses in hand-to-leg sequence, there is no systematic muscle activation sequence from the arm to the leg muscles, suggesting that the activation of the muscles is not likely the result of local stretch reflexes. In fact, the lower limb muscles are activated before the upright posture is significantly disturbed. The short-latency activation amplitude and the activation probability are clearly tuned to the direction of the arm perturbation for both rostral and caudal muscles. The effect of central set on the short-latency response has been investigated by manipulating the predictability of the perturbations. Possible underlying neural mechanisms have been discussed.

Lateral trunk lean (LTL) is a proposed intervention for knee osteoarthritis but increased muscular demands have not been considered. The objective was to compare lower extremity and trunk muscle activation and joint mechanics between normal and increased LTL gait in healthy adults. Participants (n=20, mean age 22 years) were examined under two gait conditions: normal and increased LTL. A motion capture system and force plates sampled at 100 and 2000Hz respectively were used to determine joint angles and external moments including LTL angle and external knee adduction moment (KAM). Surface electromyography, sampled at 2000Hz, measured activation of six trunk/hip muscles bilaterally. Peak LTL angle, peak KAM, gait speed, and mean values from electromyography waveforms were compared between normal and LTL conditions using paired t-tests or 2-way analysis of variance. There was a significant (p

It has been hypothesized that individuals with low back pain (LBP) will have higher trunk muscle activity during gait, in an attempt to limit spine motion, and that this "guarding strategy" may be influenced by the person's psychological response to pain. This study investigated whether the amplitude of trunk muscle activation differs between persons with chronic LBP and healthy individuals during walking, and whether changes in muscle activation were related to pain catastrophizing. Thirty persons with chronic non-specific LBP, stratified into 2 groups of high (HLBP) and low (LLBP) pain catastrophizing, were contrasted with a control group of 15 healthy individuals during walking on a treadmill at a self-selected speed. Surface electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded from 10 trunk muscles. The effects of Group and gait Sub-phase on EMG activation amplitudes were assessed. The HLBP group exhibited higher activation of certain muscles throughout the gait cycle, and reduced variability of others at specific sub-phases of gait. A significant correlation was found between activation amplitude and pain catastrophizing in most muscles, when controlling for gait speed and pain intensity. These data indicate that altered trunk muscle activation is present in some patients with LBP during walking, but does not represent a universal increase in activation for all muscles. This altered neuromotor control is, however, more strongly associated with pain catastrophizing than with pain intensity, and appears to represent a non-functional, maladaptive behavior, as it alters the normal, phasic pattern of activation in certain trunk muscles.

Postural reactions in healthy individuals in the seated position have previously been described and have been shown to depend on the direction of the perturbation; however the neck response following forward and backward translations has not been compared. The overall objective of the present study was to compare neck and trunk kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic (EMG) stabilization patterns of seated healthy individuals to forward and backward translations. Ten healthy individuals, seated on a chair fixed onto a movable platform, were exposed to forward and backward translations (distance=0.15m, peak acceleration=1.2m/s 2 ). The head and trunk kinematics as well as the EMG activity of 16 neck and trunk muscles were recorded. Neck and trunk angular displacements were computed in the sagittal plane. The centers of mass (COMs) of the head (HEAD), upper thorax (UPTX), lower thorax (LOWTX) and abdomen (ABDO) segments were also computed. Moments of force at the C7-T1 and L5-S1 levels were calculated using a top-down, inverse dynamics approach. Forward translations provoked greater overall COM peak displacements. The first peak of moment of force was also reached earlier following forward translations which may have played a role in preventing the trunk from leaning backwards. These responses can be explained by the higher postural threat imposed by a forward translation.

This study defines the limits of stability in sitting, and quantitatively assesses two measures of postural control relative to these limits. Young, healthy subjects sat, feet unsupported, on an elevated force plate. The limits of stability were determined by a least square fit of an ellipse to the center of pressure (CoP) excursion during maximal leaning in 8 directions. These were highly symmetrical and centered within the base of support. The ellipses had a mean eccentricity of 0.66 (major axis in the sagittal plane) and covered an area approx. 1/3 of the base of support. The CoP was then monitored over 4 min of quiet sitting, during which the postural sway covered an area

Background The dynamic role of the trunk musculature, with respect to stability, has not been fully explored to date. The purpose of this study was, using a transient and multi-directional perturbation, to: (1) quantify the tonic level of activity in the superficial trunk musculature prior to any perturbation; (2) quantify the phasic activity in those same muscles following application of a transient, horizontally directed load; and (3) quantify the direction-dependent behavior of this phasic response. Methods Twelve healthy individuals were perturbed during sitting via a chest harness in eight horizontal directions. Surface electromyograms were measured bilaterally from the abdominal (rectus abdominis, internal and external obliques) and back musculature (thoracic and lumbar erector spinae) to determine the tonic muscle activity prior to perturbation, and the phasic response following perturbation. A descriptive model was used to characterize the relationship between the phasic response of the muscles due to perturbation and the pulling direction. Findings Tonic activity in the trunk musculature in upright sitting is low, but still above resting levels by at about 1–3% of the MVC for the abdominal muscles, and 4–6% for the back muscles. Each trunk muscle also showed a direction-specific, phasic activation in response to perturbation, above these tonic levels of activation. This phasic activation was accurately modeled using a descriptive model for each muscle. Interpretation The obtained muscle activation level and the identified descriptive model will be applied in the design of a closed-loop controller for functional electrical stimulation.

Background and purpose Isometric activation (ISOM) of deep multifidi muscles (MF) can influence postural adjustments and primary motor cortex (M1) function in chronic low back pain (CLBP). In order to better understand how ISOM impacts on CLBP condition, the present study contrasted ISOM aftereffects on Ml function, MF postural activation and pain with another training, the global activation of paravertebral muscles (GLOB, hip extension). The main objective of this study was to compare the effects of ISOM and GLOB (3-week training each) on MF postural activation and Ml function in a CLBP population. Methods Twenty-four people with CLBP were randomly allocated to ISOM and GLOB groups for a 3- week daily practice. Pre/post-training after-effects were assessed by the onset of superficial MF (MF-S) activation during ballistic limb movements (bilateral shoulder flexion in standing; unilateral hip extension in prine lying), MF-S corticomotor control tested by transcranial magnetic stimulation of M1, and assessment of pain, kinesiophobia and disability by standardized questionnaires. Results Both ISOM and GLOB improved pain and disability. However, only ISOM influenced Ml function (decreased corticospinal excitability and increased intracortical inhibition), fastened MF-S postural activation and decreased kinesiophobia. Conclusions Changes of corticospinal excitability and of MF-S postural adjustments suggest that ISOM better influenced brain plasticity. Future studies should further test whether our novel findings relate to an influence of the exercises on the lumbopelvic control of different muscles and on cognitive function. Clinically, individual’s evaluation remains warranted before prescribing one or the other of these two conventional exercises for reducing pain. Implications This original study presents how motor control exercises can influence brain plasticity and postural control in chronic low back pain. This knowledge will impact on the decision of clinicians to prescribe specific exercises with a view of improving motor control in this musculoskeletal condition.

A major challenge in the assessment of intersegmental spinal column angles during trunk motion is the inherent error in recording the movement of bony anatomical landmarks caused by soft tissue artifacts (STAs). This study aims to perform an uncertainty analysis and estimate the typical errors induced by STA into the intersegmental angles of a multisegment spinal column model during trunk bending in different directions by modeling the relative displacement between skin-mounted markers and actual bony landmarks during trunk bending. First, we modeled the maximum displacement of markers relative to the bony landmarks with a multivariate Gaussian distribution. In order to estimate the distribution parameters, we measured these relative displacements on five subjects at maximum trunk bending posture. Then, in order to model the error depending on trunk bending angle, we assumed that the error grows linearly as a function of the bending angle. Second, we applied our error model to the trunk motion measurement of 11 subjects to estimate the corrected trajectories of the bony landmarks and investigate the errors induced into the intersegmental angles of a multisegment spinal column model. For this purpose, the trunk was modeled as a seven-segment rigid-body system described using 23 reflective markers placed on various bony landmarks of the spinal column. Eleven seated subjects performed trunk bending in five directions and the three-dimensional (3D) intersegmental angles during trunk bending were calculated before and after error correction. While STA minimally affected the intersegmental angles in the sagittal plane (

Objectives. To test the efficacy and acceptance of a footdrop stimulator controlled by a tilt sensor. Methods. A nonrandomized, test-retest study of 26 subjects with footdrop of more than 1 year’s duration, resulting from various central nervous system disorders, was performed in 4 centers for at least 3 months. Speed of walking in a straight line, speed around a figure of 8, and physiological cost index (PCI) were measured with and without the device. Hours/day and steps/day using the device were recorded. Results.All but 2 subjects used the tilt sensor at home, rather than a foot switch. Walking speed increased by 15% after 3 months ( n = 26; P < 0.01), 32% after 6 months ( n = 16; P < 0.01), and 47% after 12 months ( n = 8; P < 0.05), while PCI decreased. The number of steps taken per day of use increased significantly over time, and increased speed was directly correlated with usage. Walking speed also increased with the stimulator off, but to a lesser extent, indicating a training effect. Subject feedback from a questionnaire indicated satisfaction with the stimulator. Conclusions. Both efficacy and acceptance of the stimulator were good in a population of subjects with chronic footdrop.

This study aimed at testing the reliability and construct validity of a trunk perturbation protocol (TPP) that estimates the intrinsic and reflexive contributions to low-back stiffness. The TPP consists of a series of pseudorandom position-controlled trunk perturbations in an apparatus measuring forces and displacements at the harness surrounding the thorax. Intrinsic and reflexive contributions to low-back stiffness were estimated using a system identification procedure, leading to 12 parameters. Study 1 methods (reliability): 30 subjects performed five 75-s trials, on each of two separate days (eight weeks apart). Reliability was assessed using the generalizability theory, which allowed computing indexes of dependability (ϕ, analogous to intraclass correlation coefficient) and standard errors of measurement (SEM). Study 2 methods (validity): 20 healthy subjects performed three 75-s trials for each of five experimental conditions assumed to provide different lumbar stiffness; testing the construct validity of the TPP using four conditions with different lumbar belt designs and one control condition without. Study 1 results (reliability): Learning was seen between the first and following trials. Consequently, reliability analyses were performed without the first trial. Simulations showed that averaging the scores of three trials can lead to acceptable reliability results for some TPP parameters. Study 2 results (validity): All lumbar belt designs increased low-back intrinsic stiffness, while only some of them decreased reflex stiffness, which support the construct validity of the TPP. Overall, these findings support the use of the TPP to test the effect of rehabilitation or between-groups differences with regards to trunk stiffness.

Background Research suggests that in some patients with low back pain, lumbar belts (LB) may derive secondary prophylactic benefits. It remains to be determined, however, which patients are most likely to benefit from prophylactic LB use, and which LB design is optimal for this purpose. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different lumbar belts designs on range of motion and lumbopelvic rhythm. Methods Healthy subjects (10 males; 10 females) performed five standing lumbar flexion/extension cycles, with knees straight, during a control (no belt) and four lumbar belt experimental conditions (extensible, with and without dorsal and ventral panels; non-extensible). Motion of the pelvis and lumbar spine was measured with 3D angular inertial sensors. Results The results suggest that adding dorsal and ventral panels to an extensible LB produces the largest lumbar spine restrictions among the four tested lumbar belt designs, which in turn also altered the lumbopelvic rhythm. On a more exploratory basis, some sex differences were seen and the sex × experimental condition interaction just failed to reach significance. Conclusions LB may provide some biomechanical benefit for patients with low back disorders, based on the protection that may be provided against soft tissue creep-based injury mechanisms. More comprehensive assessment of different LB designs, with additional psychological and neuromuscular measurement outcomes, however, must first be conducted in order to produce sound recommendations for LB use. Future research should also to take sex into account, with sufficient statistical power to clearly refute or confirm the observed trends. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-307) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Measuring lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) using multiple movements is impractical for clinical research, because finding statistically significant effects requires a large proportion of subjects to present with the same impairment. The purpose of this study was to develop a single measure representing the total available lumbar ROM. Twenty participants with low back pain performed three series of eight lumbar spine movements, in each of two sessions. For each series, an ellipse and a cubic spline were fit to the end-range positions, measured based on the position of the twelfth thoracic vertebra in the transverse plane of the sacrum. The area of each shape provides a measure of the total available ROM, whereas their center reflects the movements’ symmetry. Using generalizability theory, the index of dependability for the area and anterior-posterior center position was found to be 0.90, but was slightly lower for the mediolateral center position. Slightly better values were achieved using the spline-fitting approach. Further analysis also indicated that excellent reliability, and acceptable minimal detectable change values, would be achieved with a single testing session. These data indicate that the proposed measure provides a reliable and easily interpretable measure of total lumbar spine ROM.

Clinical assessment protocols must produce data that are reliable, with a clinically attainable minimal detectable change (MDC). In a reliability study, generalizability theory has 2 advantages over classical test theory. These advantages provide information that allows assessment protocols to be adjusted to match individual patient profiles. First, generalizability theory allows the user to simultaneously consider multiple sources of measurement error variance (facets). Second, it allows the user to generalize the findings of the main study across the different study facets and to recalculate the reliability and MDC based on different combinations of facet conditions. In doing so, clinical assessment protocols can be chosen based on minimizing the number of measures that must be taken to achieve a realistic MDC, using repeated measures to minimize the MDC, or simply based on the combination that best allows the clinician to monitor an individual patient's progress over a specified period of time.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of successive repetitions of a measure of hamstring flexibility—the passive unilateral straight leg raise (SLR)—on the reliability of this measure. Method: Ten repetitions of the SLR were performed on nine healthy adults. Measures were quantified using an electromagnetic tracking system and standardized using a handheld dynamometer by stopping the SLR at a set end-point force. The 10 repetitions were analyzed as two blocks of five, and intra-class correlation coefficients—models (2,1) and (3,k)—were calculated for each block of data. Results: ICC values for both models were comparable between the two blocks of data. Conclusion: Previous loading cycles, to a set end-point force, are unlikely to improve the reliability of muscle flexibility assessment in a clinical setting.

The current study provides a quantitative assessment of three-dimensional spine motion during target-directed trunk movements in sitting. Subjects sat on an elevated surface, without foot support, and targets were placed in five directions, at three subject-specific distances (based on trunk height). Subjects were asked to lean toward the target, touch it with their head, and return to upright sitting. A retro-reflective motion analysis system was used to measure spine motion, using three kinematic trunk models (1, 3 and 7 segments). Significant differences were noted in the total trunk motion measured between the models, as well as between target distances and directions. In the most segmented model, inter-segmental trunk motion was also found to differ between trunk levels, with complex interaction effects involving target distance and direction. These findings suggest that inter-segmental spine motion is complex, task dependent, and often unevenly distributed between spine levels, with motion patterns differing between subjects, even in the absence of pathology. Use of a multi-segmental model provides the most interpretable findings, allowing for differentiation of individual motion patterns of the spine. Such an approach may be beneficial to the understanding of movement-related spine pathologies.