Search

Introduction TNBC is overrepresented in Black women, and Black patients with TNBC have worse clinical outcomes compared to non-Black patients. This disparity likely results from racial differences in clinical, biological, and demographic features of TNBC and social determinants of health. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is current standard of care for high-risk TNBC. However, Black patients have been poorly represented in immunotherapy TNBC trials, making it difficult to assess comparative efficacy of immunotherapy in Black patients. Methods We utilized two TNBC neoadjuvant trials to assess racial differences in the tumor immune microenvironment composition and evaluate impact of race on response to chemotherapy vs chemoimmunotherapy. NeoSTOP trial (NCT02413320) randomized 100 stage I-III TNBC patients to receive neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel + doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (CbP+AC) or carboplatin/docetaxel (CbD). NeoPACT trial (NCT03639948) enrolled 120 patients with stage I-III TNBC who received neoadjuvant CbD + pembrolizumab (CbD+P). sTILs were centrally quantified, and RNA extracted from pretreatment tissue was subjected to next-generation sequencing. Relative leukocyte fractions were computed by CIBERSORTx. Factors were tested as predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) using logistic regression analysis. Event-free survival (EFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups by log-rank test, followed by Cox regression analysis. Results The study population includes 197 patients with known race, sTILs, and gene expression data (84 patients from NeoSTOP, 113 from NeoPACT). 15/84 (18%) patients in NeoSTOP and 20/113 (18%) patients in NeoPACT self-reported Black race. There was no significant difference in age, T or N stage, or germline BRCA1/2 mutation status by race in either study. Black patients had significantly higher sTILs than non-Black patients (median 40% vs 15%, P=0.048) and were more likely to have ≥20% sTILs than non-Black patients (66% vs 44%, P=0.026). There was no significant difference in pCR by race in NeoSTOP (OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.19-1.84, P=0.37; pCR 47% for Black vs 59% for non-Black). In contrast, in NeoPACT, Black patients had a significantly higher pCR compared to non-Black patients (OR=3.27, 95% CI 1.01-10.64, P=0.049; pCR 79% for Black vs 53% for non-Black). In NeoSTOP, EFS was similar for Black and non-Black patients (3-year EFS 92% and 94%, respectively, HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.11-7.28, P=0.90). In NeoPACT, EFS was numerically higher in Black vs non-Black patients (3-year EFS 93% and 81%, respectively, HR=0.43, 95% CI 0.05-3.36, P=0.40); NeoPACT survival follow-up is ongoing at the time of this report. On CIBERSORTx analysis, Black patients had relative depletion of immunosuppressive pro-tumorigenic M2 macrophages (P=0.005) and CD4+ memory resting T cells (P=0.021) compared to non-Black patients. Conclusions Compared to non-Black patients, Black patients with TNBC are more likely to have immune-enriched tumors with lower relative abundance of immunosuppressive leukocytes. These findings suggest potential for higher relative magnitude of benefit from checkpoint inhibitor therapy in Black compared to non-Black patients. Supporting this biological hypothesis, we noted that Black and non-Black patients had equivalent rates of pCR with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, pCR rate among Black patients was significantly higher than in non-Black patients when treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. These findings should be confirmed in other studies and can optimize utilization of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Our findings also underscore the importance of efforts to address disparity in access and use of immunotherapy in Black patients. Citation Format: Shane R. Stecklein, Rachel Yoder, Roberto Salgado, Joshua M. Staley, Anne O’Dea, Lauren Nye, Manana Elia, Deepti Satelli, Gregory Crane, Richard McKittrick, Andrew K. Godwin, Qamar Khan, Priyanka Sharma. Black patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have enriched stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and receive preferential benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-06.

Introduction: The TNBC-DX risk score includes the 14-gene immunoglobulin (IGG) immune signature, tumor size, and nodal status and has shown prognostic value for survival in early-stage TNBC (B. Conte et al., ESMO Breast 2021). However, currently unknown are the value of the TNBC-DX risk score and IGG immune signature in 1) predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy, and 2) predicting outcomes the context of neoadjuvant anti-PD1 treatment. Here, we assessed the IGG signature and the TNBC-DX risk score in patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NeoPACT; NCT03639948) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy without immunotherapy (NeoSTOP; NCT02413320). Methods: NeoPACT trial enrolled 120 patients with stage I-III TNBC who received carboplatin (AUC 6) + docetaxel (75 mg/m2) + pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 21 days x 6 cycles. NeoSTOP randomized 100 patients with stage I-III TNBC to two chemotherapy regimens; Arm B of NeoSTOP was included in this correlative study as the chemotherapy regimen was identical to NeoPACT. RNA isolated from pretreatment tumor tissue was subjected to next-generation sequencing. The 14-gene IGG immune signature and TNBC-DX risk score were calculated in silico as previously described. Evaluation of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) was performed as previously described. Markers were tested for prediction of pCR. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the effect of multiple variables. Event-free survival (EFS) curves were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and groups compared by the log-rank test, followed by Cox regression analysis. Results: In this analysis, 112 patients were treated with chemoimmunotherapy on NeoPACT (node-positive = 38%, pCR rate = 58%). In the NeoPACT trial, the 14-gene IGG signature (as a continuous variable) was significantly associated with improved pCR (odds ratio [OR]=1.105, 95% CI 1.019-1.197, P=0.015 for every 0.2 increment). The pCR rates in IGG-high (≥ median) and IGG-low (< median) groups were 71% and 44%, respectively (OR=3.152, 95% CI 1.420-6.996, P=0.005). In terms of EFS, the 14-gene IGG signature was not prognostic (hazard ratio [HR]=0.507, 95% CI 0.148-1.735, p=0.269). In contrast, TNBC-DX risk score was strongly associated with EFS (HR=5.684, 95% CI 1.226-26.356, P=0.012), even when adjusted for sTILs and pCR status (HR=8.415, 95% CI 1.054-67.169, P=0.044). Estimated 3-year EFS rates in TNBC-DX high and low risk groups (above and below median) were 77% and 89%, respectively (P=0.012). In 43 NeoSTOP patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy only (node-positive = 33%, pCR rate = 53%), no association of IGG signature with pCR or TNBC-DX score with EFS was observed. Finally, we observed a moderate correlation between IGG signature and sTILs in both trial datasets combined (r=0.642, P< 0.001). Conclusions: High expression of the 14-gene IGG immune signature in baseline pretreatment tumor samples in early-stage TNBC is significantly associated with pCR following pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The combination of this signature with tumor burden as assessed by TNBC-DX is prognostic for long-term outcomes. Availability of biomarkers that can predict both pathological response and survival with chemoimmunotherapy can optimize this therapy, and evaluation of this biomarker in larger studies is warranted. Citation Format: Priyanka Sharma, Shane R. Stecklein, Rachel Yoder, Joshua M. Staley, Roberto Salgado, Laia Paré, Benedetta Conte, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Anne O’Dea, Lauren Nye, Manana Elia, Deepti Satelli, Gregory Crane, Richard McKittrick, Qamar Khan, Andrew K. Godwin, Aleix Prat. PD11-07 Association of TNBC-DX scores with outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy: a correlative analysis from NeoPACT and NeoSTOP trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-07.

NeoSTOP study schema

Purpose:Addition of carboplatin (Cb) to anthracycline chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response (pCR), and carboplatin plus taxane regimens also yield encouraging pCR rates in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Aim of the NeoSTOP multisite randomized phase II trial was to assess efficacy of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant carboplatin regimens.Patients and Methods:Patients aged ≥18 years with stage I–III TNBC were randomized (1:1) to receive either paclitaxel (P) weekly × 12 plus carboplatin AUC6 every 21 days × 4 followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 14 days × 4 (CbP → AC, arm A), or carboplatin AUC6 + docetaxel (D) every 21 days × 6 (CbD, arm B). Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) were assessed. Primary endpoint was pCR in breast and axilla. Other endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB), toxicity, cost, and event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS).Results:One hundred patients were randomized; arm A (n = 48) or arm B (n = 52). pCR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%–69%] in arm A and 54% (95% CI, 40%–68%) in arm B. RCB 0+I rate was 67% in both arms. Median sTIL density was numerically higher in those with pCR compared with those with residual disease (20% vs. 5%; P = 0.25). At median follow-up of 38 months, EFS and OS were similar in the two arms. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in arm A compared with arm B, with the most notable differences in neutropenia (60% vs. 8%; P < 0.001) and febrile neutropenia (19% vs. 0%; P < 0.001). There was one treatment-related death (arm A) due to acute leukemia. Mean treatment cost was lower for arm B compared with arm A (P = 0.02).Conclusions:The two-drug CbD regimen yielded pCR, RCB 0+I, and survival rates similar to the four-drug regimen of CbP → AC, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and lower treatment-associated cost.

Purpose: Addition of carboplatin (Cb) to anthracycline chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response (pCR), and carboplatin plus taxane regimens also yield encouraging pCR rates in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Aim of the NeoSTOP multisite randomized phase II trial was to assess efficacy of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant carboplatin regimens. Patients and Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with stage I–III TNBC were randomized (1:1) to receive either paclitaxel (P) weekly × 12 plus carboplatin AUC6 every 21 days × 4 followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 14 days × 4 (CbP → AC, arm A), or carboplatin AUC6 + docetaxel (D) every 21 days × 6 (CbD, arm B). Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) were assessed. Primary endpoint was pCR in breast and axilla. Other endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB), toxicity, cost, and event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: One hundred patients were randomized; arm A (n = 48) or arm B (n = 52). pCR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%–69%] in arm A and 54% (95% CI, 40%–68%) in arm B. RCB 0+I rate was 67% in both arms. Median sTIL density was numerically higher in those with pCR compared with those with residual disease (20% vs. 5%; P = 0.25). At median follow-up of 38 months, EFS and OS were similar in the two arms. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in arm A compared with arm B, with the most notable differences in neutropenia (60% vs. 8%; P < 0.001) and febrile neutropenia (19% vs. 0%; P < 0.001). There was one treatment-related death (arm A) due to acute leukemia. Mean treatment cost was lower for arm B compared with arm A (P = 0.02). Conclusions: The two-drug CbD regimen yielded pCR, RCB 0+I, and survival rates similar to the four-drug regimen of CbP → AC, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and lower treatment-associated cost.

Introduction: Pathological complete response (pCR) in unselected triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with excellent long-term survival. However, controversy remains as to whether pCR in BRCA mutation associated (BRCA[+]) TNBC is predictive of improved long-term outcome. A recent study suggests that pCR was not a surrogate for outcomes in BRCA1 associated TNBC. All of the patients in this study harbored an Ashkenazi Jewish founder BRCA1 mutation and the majority of mutation carriers underwent lumpectomy. Impact of pCR as it relates to BRCA status in a larger, heterogeneous TNBC cohort treated in a contemporary time frame is not known. Aim: Evaluate and compare the prognostic impact of pCR as it relates to the BRCA mutation status in patients enrolled in a prospective multisite TNBC registry. Methods: 453 patients with stage I-III TNBC were enrolled within a multisite registry between 2011- 2015, out of which 173 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and also underwent germline BRCA testing. pCR in the breast and axilla was evaluated and patients were followed for reoccurrence and survival. Recurrence free survival (RFS) was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among groups with log-rank statistic. Results: For the 173 eligible patients the median age was 49 years; African-American:14%; median tumor size:3 cm; 42%:Lymph node positive; and 18% (32/173) demonstrated BRCA mutation (BRCA1=28, BRCA2=4). All patients received anthracycline and/or taxane based NAC. pCR rates for BRCA[+] and wild type (BRCA[-]) patients was 72% and 46% respectively (p=0.01). 97% of BRCA[+] and 42% of BRCA[-] patients underwent bilateral mastectomy (p=0.001). The three year RFS was 92% and 81% in BRCA[+] and BRCA[-] patients, respectively (p=0.18). Attainment of pCR was associated with excellent 3 year RFS of 95% and 97% in BRCA[+] and BRCA[-] patients, respectively (p=0.85). Among BRCA[-] patients lack of pCR was associated with significantly worse 3 year RFS (70% RFS in patients without pCR, compared to 97% in patients with pCR; p=0.001). Among BRCA[+] patients lack of pCR was associated with numerically lower but not statistically significant worse 3 year RFS (83% RFS in patients without pCR, compared to 95% in patients with pCR; p=0.41). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, only stage III disease was associated with higher risk of relapse (p Conclusions: Our observation of higher pCR in BRCA-carriers compared to wild-type TNBC patients is consistent with previously published literature. In this contemporary cohort of TNBC patients for whom the majority of BRCA[+] patients underwent bilateral mastectomy, attainment of pCR carried an excellent prognosis in both BRCA[+] and BRCA[-] patients. On the other hand, BRCA[+] patients who do not attain pCR may have better outcomes compared to BRCA[-] patients without pCR. Further research to explore the underlying biological mechanisms involved in tumor response and relapse in BRCA[+] and BRCA[-] TNBC patients is needed. Furthermore, given these observations, germline BRCA mutation status should be used as a stratification variable in studies evaluating pCR and long term outcomes with investigational therapies in TNBC. Citation Format: Prochaska LH, Godwin AK, Kimler BF, Lehn C, Klemp JR, O'Dea A, Elia M, Hoffmann MS, Crane G, McKittrick R, Sheehan M, Graff SL, Madhusudhana S, Khan QJ, Jensen RA, Sharma P. Pathological complete response is associated with excellent outcomes in BRCA mutation associated triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-02.

Background: Triple negative breast cancer is defined by lack of expression of ER/PR (immunohistochemistry expression Table 1. Demographic, clinical, pathologic, and treatment characteristicsCharacteristics - N (%)All N=516TNBC (ER & PR Citation Format: Rachel Yoder, Bruce F Kimler, Joshua M Staley, Kelsey Schwensen, Yen Y Wang, Karissa Finke, Anne O'Dea, Lauren Nye, Manana Elia, Gregory Crane, Richard McKittrick, Robert Pluenneke, Sheshadri Madhusudhana, Larry Beck, Roberto Rodriguez, Anuj Shrestha, Larry Corum, Mark Marsico, Andrew K Godwin, Qamar Khan, Priyanka Sharma. Impact of low versus negative estrogen/progesterone receptor status on clinico-pathologic characteristics and survival outcomes in HER2 negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-04.

Proliferative breast disease is known to be a common finding in women at risk for breast cancer. A group of 263 women defined as being at high risk for developing breast carcinoma underwent random fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of one or both breasts. In addition, a group of 30 low-risk volunteers underwent random FNA of one or both breasts. Using cytomorphologic criteria, only 29% of our high-risk group had normal (non-proliferative) cytology. Nine percent (9%) had apocrine metaplasia. Forty-three percent (43%) of high-risk women had proliferative breast disease with or without apocrine metaplasia and 19% had atypical hyperplasia (proliferative breast disease with atypia). In contrast, 83% of low-risk women had normal cytology, 17% had proliferative breast disease, and none had proliferative breast disease with atypia. The difference in prevalence of normal cytology, proliferative breast disease, and proliferative breast disease with atypia between women at high and low risk for developing carcinoma were all statistically significant (p < 0.01). Nine of the 263 women later developed in situ (n= 6) or invasive (n= 3) breast cancer. Eight of those 9 patients had proliferative breast disease with atypia on a prior random FNA and one had proliferative breast disease. These findings indicate that cytologic evidence of proliferative breast disease and proliferative breast disease with atypia from random FNA is more prevalent in high-risk than in low-risk women; and further that proliferative breast disease with atypia in the random needle aspirates is significantly associated with later cancer development.

Several groups of investigators have explored the possibility that widespread morphologic and molecular changes in breast tissue of high-risk women may exist prior to breast cancer development and that these changes might be detected by random sampling. These tissue changes might serve as risk bio-markers if they are found to be associated with the development of cancer in prospective trials. We review here studies of morphologic and molecular abnormalities in nipple and fine needle aspirates in women at high risk for breast cancer. Cytologic evidence of hyperplasia with atypia detected by random sampling appears to have particular potential for development as a risk biomarker. If this morphologic change is found to be reversible with chemopreventive agents that are later found to prevent or delay the appearance of cancer, then hyperplasia with atypia as detected by random sampling may serve as a surrogate endpoint biomarker for response in phase II chemoprevention trials.

A 25-YEAR-OLD man presented with a suspected right-sided subdural hematoma after a skiing accident. A large hemorrhagic mass was found and was evacuated. Histological studies demonstrated a highly cellular neoplasm with extensive hemorrhage. Further histological, immunohistochemical (includi

Fine needle aspirates (FNA) from 106 high-risk women and 25 low-risk women were evaluated for overexpression of estrogen receptor (ER), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mutant p53, and HER-2/neu by immunocytochemistry, and for aneuploidy by image analysis. Aspirates were also classified cytologically as normal, apocrine metaplasia, epithelial hyperplasia (EH), or dysplasia. High-risk women were those with a first-degree relative with breast cancer (76%), precancerous breast disease (26%), prior cancer of the contralateral breast (9%), or multiple abnormalities (11%). Low-risk women had none of the above risk factors, nor a prior breast biopsy or clinical evidence of fibrocystic disease. The median 10-year Gail risk for the high-risk group was 4%, compared to 0.7% for the low-risk group. There were significant differences (p < 0.01) between high- and low-risk women in the prevalences of hyperplasia (55% versus 12%), dysplasia (19% versus 0%), aneuploidy (32% versus 0%), overexpressed EGFR (32% versus 4%), and overexpressed p53 (29% versus 4%). The prevalence of multiple biomarker abnormalities was also greater in high-risk than in low-risk women (28% versus 0%; p < 0.01). Four percent (4%) of FNAs from high-risk women with normal cytology, 29% of aspirates with hyperplastic cytology, and 60% of those with dysplasia were associated with two or more biomarker abnormalities. The differences in the prevalence of multiple biomarker abnormalities among various cytologic categories were statistically significant (p = 0.02, normal versus EH; p = 0.02, EH versus dysplasia; p < 0.01, normal versus dysplasia).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)