Search

Supplementary Table I (RPPA) and Table II (Gene expression data).

Supplementary Methods

Purpose:The DNA damage immune response (DDIR) assay was developed in breast cancer based on biology associated with deficiencies in homologous recombination and Fanconi anemia pathways. A positive DDIR call identifies patients likely to respond to platinum-based chemotherapies in breast and esophageal cancers. In colorectal cancer, there is currently no biomarker to predict response to oxaliplatin. We tested the ability of the DDIR assay to predict response to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer and characterized the biology in DDIR-positive colorectal cancer.Experimental Design:Samples and clinical data were assessed according to DDIR status from patients who received either 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or 5FUFA (bolus and infusion 5-FU with folinic acid) plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) within the FOCUS trial (n = 361, stage IV), or neoadjuvant FOLFOX in the FOxTROT trial (n = 97, stage II/III). Whole transcriptome, mutation, and IHC data of these samples were used to interrogate the biology of DDIR in colorectal cancer.Results:Contrary to our hypothesis, DDIR-negative patients displayed a trend toward improved outcome for oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy compared with DDIR-positive patients. DDIR positivity was associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and colorectal molecular subtype 1. Refinement of the DDIR signature, based on overlapping IFN-related chemokine signaling associated with DDIR positivity across colorectal cancer and breast cancer cohorts, further confirmed that the DDIR assay did not have predictive value for oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.Conclusions:DDIR positivity does not predict improved response following oxaliplatin treatment in colorectal cancer. However, data presented here suggest the potential of the DDIR assay in identifying immune-rich tumors that may benefit from immune checkpoint blockade, beyond current use of MSI status.

Supplementary Results

Related to Figure 6: Western blots and immunofluorescence images of PDLIM2 and b-catenin phospho-Ser675 expression and localization in BT549 cells overexpressing HA-PDLIM2 are included. Graph depicting measurements of cell migration in HA-PDLIM2-expressing BT549 is shown. The effects of suppression of PDLIM2 on b-catenin and b1-integrin levels in HCC1806 and MDA-MB-231-LUC2 are shown. Further analyses of effects of loss of adhesion and also, serum starvation, on PDLIM2 and active b-catenin subcellular localization in TN Breast cell lines are also shown.

Figures S1-S9, Tables S1, S2

The PDLIM2 protein regulates stability of transcription factors including NF-κB and STATs in epithelial and hemopoietic cells. PDLIM2 is strongly expressed in certain cancer cell lines that exhibit an epithelial-to-mesenchymal phenotype, and its suppression is sufficient to reverse this phenotype. PDLIM2 supports the epithelial polarity of nontransformed breast cells, suggesting distinct roles in tumor suppression and oncogenesis. To better understand its overall function, we investigated PDLIM2 expression and activity in breast cancer. PDLIM2 protein was present in 60% of tumors diagnosed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and only 20% of other breast cancer subtypes. High PDLIM2 expression in TNBC was positively correlated with adhesion signaling and β-catenin activity. Interestingly, PDLIM2 was restricted to the cytoplasm/membrane of TNBC cells and excluded from the nucleus. In breast cell lines, PDLIM2 retention in the cytoplasm was controlled by cell adhesion, and translocation to the nucleus was stimulated by insulin-like growth factor-1 or TGFβ. Cytoplasmic PDLIM2 was associated with active β-catenin and ectopic expression of PDLIM2 was sufficient to increase β-catenin levels and its transcriptional activity in reporter assays. Suppression of PDLIM2 inhibited tumor growth in vivo, whereas overexpression of PDLIM2 disrupted growth in 3D cultures. These results suggest that PDLIM2 may serve as a predictive biomarker for a large subset of TNBC whose phenotype depends on adhesion-regulated β-catenin activity and which may be amenable to therapies that target these pathways.Significance:This study shows that PDLIM2 expression defines a subset of triple-negative breast cancer that may benefit from targeting the β-catenin and adhesion signaling pathways.

Related to Figures 5 and 6: Contains images of PDLIM2 immunocytochemistry staining of PDLIM2-negative TNBC cell lines not included in Figure 5 and additional analysis of TN Breast cells under adhesion versus suspension conditions. Protein expression and quantification of β-catenin phosphorylated on Ser675 are also shown. Immunofluorescence images of HA-PDLIM2 overexpressed in BT549 cells are included.

Related to Figure 2: Shows data for distribution of IHC scores of PDLIM2 staining in TNBC tissues and examples of PDLIM2 IHC images of normal tissue. Includes Kaplan Meier curves and clinicopathological analysis of RATHER cohorts in relation to PDLIM2 expression.

Related to Figures 2 and 3: Shows counts of distribution of IHC scores of PDLIM2 staining in RATHER cohort based on TNBC subtype. Includes analysis of TNBC subtypes of tissues in the RATHER cohorts in relation to PDLIM2 expression, a Kaplan Meier plot of breast cancer specific survival in relation to TNBC subtype, and correlation plot of PDLIM2 mRNA and protein expression in the RATHER cohorts. Examples of nuclear PDLIM2 expression in stromal/infiltrating cells are also shown.

Related to Figure 1: Includes additional images of immunohistochemical staining and scores of PDLIM2 expression in tumor and stroma of Breast Cancer TMA samples.

supplementary methods

Related to Figure 4: Includes TNBC subtype classification of the cell lines used in this study and additional analyses of expression of PDLIM2 and epithelial/mesenchymal markers. A graph illustrates PDLIM2 RNASeq and protein expression in the cell lines. Expression of b1 integrin, Phospho-EGFR, Phospho-IGF-1R and Phospho c-Met in TN Breast cell lines are also shown.

Supplementary Methods from The ΔNp63 Proteins Are Key Allies of BRCA1 in the Prevention of Basal-Like Breast Cancer

Evidence is accumulating to suggest that some of the diverse functions associated with BRCA1 may relate to its ability to transcriptionally regulate key downstream target genes. Here, we identify S100A7 (psoriasin), S100A8, and S100A9, members of the S100A family of calcium-binding proteins, as novel BRCA1-repressed targets. We show that functional BRCA1 is required for repression of these family members and that a BRCA1 disease–associated mutation abrogates BRCA1-mediated repression of psoriasin. Furthermore, we show that BRCA1 and c-Myc form a complex on the psoriasin promoter and that BRCA1-mediated repression of psoriasin is dependent on functional c-Myc. Finally, we show that psoriasin expression is induced by the topoisomerase IIα poison, etoposide, in the absence of functional BRCA1 and increased psoriasin expression enhances cellular sensitivity to this chemotherapeutic agent. Therefore, we identified a novel transcriptional mechanism that is likely to contribute to BRCA1-mediated resistance to etoposide.

Supplementary Methods and Table 1. Supplementary Table 1: siRNA target genes

Supplementary Tables 1-2 from The ΔNp63 Proteins Are Key Allies of BRCA1 in the Prevention of Basal-Like Breast Cancer

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is an important signaling molecule in the DNA damage response (DDR). ATM loss of function can produce a synthetic lethal phenotype in combination with tumor-associated mutations in FA/BRCA pathway components. In this study, we took an siRNA screening strategy to identify other tumor suppressors that, when inhibited, similarly sensitized cells to ATM inhibition. In this manner, we determined that PTEN and ATM were synthetically lethal when jointly inhibited. PTEN-deficient cells exhibited elevated levels of reactive oxygen species, increased endogenous DNA damage, and constitutive ATM activation. ATM inhibition caused catastrophic DNA damage, mitotic cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis specifically in PTEN-deficient cells in comparison with wild-type cells. Antioxidants abrogated the increase in DNA damage and ATM activation in PTEN-deficient cells, suggesting a requirement for oxidative DNA damage in the mechanism of cell death. Lastly, the ATM inhibitor KU-60019 was specifically toxic to PTEN mutant cancer cells in tumor xenografts and reversible by reintroduction of wild-type PTEN. Together, our results offer a mechanistic rationale for clinical evaluation of ATM inhibitors in PTEN-deficient tumors. Cancer Res; 75(11); 2159–65. ©2015 AACR.

Supplementary Data from BRCA1 and c-Myc Associate to Transcriptionally Repress Psoriasin, a DNA Damage–Inducible Gene

Little is known about the origin of basal-like breast cancers, an aggressive disease that is highly similar to BRCA1-mutant breast cancers. p63 family proteins that are structurally related to the p53 suppressor protein are known to function in stem cell regulation and stratified epithelia development in multiple tissues, and p63 expression may be a marker of basal-like breast cancers. Here we report that ΔNp63 isoforms of p63 are transcriptional targets for positive regulation by BRCA1. Our analyses of breast cancer tissue microarrays and BRCA1-modulated breast cancer cell lines do not support earlier reports that p63 is a marker of basal-like or BRCA1 mutant cancers. Nevertheless, we found that BRCA1 interacts with the specific p63 isoform ΔNp63γ along with transcription factor isoforms AP-2α and AP-2γ. BRCA1 required ΔNp63γ and AP-2γ to localize to an intronic enhancer region within the p63 gene to upregulate transcription of the ΔNp63 isoforms. In mammary stem/progenitor cells, siRNA-mediated knockdown of ΔNp63 expression resulted in genomic instability, increased cell proliferation, loss of DNA damage checkpoint control, and impaired growth control. Together, our findings establish that transcriptional upregulation of ΔNp63 proteins is critical for BRCA1 suppressor function and that defects in BRCA1-ΔNp63 signaling are key events in the pathogenesis of basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Res; 71(5); 1933–44. ©2011 AACR.

Supplementary Figures 1-4. Figure 1: ATM is a potential drug target for PTEN-deficient cells Figure 2: The synthetic lethality with PTEN loss and ATM inhibition is independent of AKT function Figure 3: The synthetic lethality with PTEN loss and ATM inhibition is independent of RAD51 function Supplementary Figure 4: In vivo efficacy of ATM inhibition with PTEN loss

Prostate cancer (PCa) lethality is driven by its progression to a metastatic castration-resistant state, yet the signaling mechanisms underlying metastatic spread remain unknown. Here we show that STAT3 converges with the LKB1/mTORC1 and CREB to control metastatic disease in PCa mouse models. Unexpectedly, STAT3 was found to be upregulated in diabetic PCa patients undergoing metformin therapy with a concomitant reduction in mTORC1 expression. In preclinical mouse models of PCa, genetic ablation or activation of STAT3 had opposing effects on LKB1/AMPK/mTORC1- dependent tumorigenesis. Using genetic and pharmacological approaches, we identified LKB1 as a direct STAT3 target while repressing CREB. Furthermore, PCa patients with high CREB expression had inferior clinical outcome with significantly increased risk of disease and metastatic recurrence. We observe that castration state lowers STAT3 abundance and increases AR and CREB levels, leading to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). Our findings revealed that STAT3 controls mTORC1 and CREB in metastatic disease, suggesting CREB as a promising target for lethal CRPC.

Background We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a novel anti-angiogenic peptide. Methods We used an open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation Phase I trial design in patients with solid tumours. ALM201 was administered subcutaneously once daily for 5 days every week in unselected patients with solid tumours. Results Twenty (8 male, 12 female) patients with various solid tumours were treated (18 evaluable for toxicity) over eight planned dose levels (10–300 mg). ALM201 was well-tolerated at all dose levels without CTCAE grade 4 toxicities. Adverse events were predominantly grades 1–2, most commonly, localised injection-site reactions (44.4%), vomiting (11%), fatigue (16.7%), arthralgia (5.6%) and headache (11%). Thrombosis occurred in two patients at the 100 mg and 10 mg dose levels. The MTD was not reached, and a recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) based on feasibility was declared. Plasma exposure increased with dose (less than dose-proportional at the two highest dose levels). No peptide accumulation was evident. The median treatment duration was 11.1 (range 3–18) weeks. Four of 18 evaluable patients (22%) had stable disease. Conclusions Doses up to 300 mg of ALM201 subcutaneously are feasible and well-tolerated. Further investigation of this agent in selected tumour types/settings would benefit from patient-selection biomarkers.

Introduction: We previously identified an immune-driven gene expression signature recognizing loss of the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA DNA repair pathway - the DNA damage immune response (DDIR) assay. This 44-gene expression-based assay predicted response to DNA damaging chemotherapy in breast cancer, with a 5-year relapse-free survival hazard ratio of 0.37 post adjuvant treatment in assay positive patients. We demonstrated constitutive activation of the cGAS-STING pathway as the underlying mechanism driving immune gene expression in this subgroup, as a result of aberrant cytoplasmic DNA due to deficient DNA repair. We sought to evaluate efficacy of this immune-based signature in predicting response to neoadjuvant DNA-damaging chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. Methods: Patients with early breast cancer were recruited from 2 Northern Ireland centres. All received 3 cycles of 5FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy initially, with subsequent taxane/HER2 targeted therapies as indicated. Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumor samples were obtained at baseline, post 3 cycles of FEC and at resection. Chemotherapy response was assessed by residual cancer burden (RCB) scoring. Gene expression data was obtained from all baseline samples and 18 midpoint samples containing sufficient residual tumor. DDIR assay call was determined using a predetermined cut-off. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed at each time point on H&E stained sections. In addition, gene expression signatures (n=62) encompassing 6 hallmarks of cancer (Immune response, Genome instability, Angiogenesis, EMT, Cell death and Proliferation) were reported using the Almac ClaraT platform. Results: 46 patients were recruited - 26 were assay positive, with high immune gene expression, and 20 assay negative. The DDIR assay predicted NAC response with an odds ratio for RCB 0-1 of 4.67 (95% CI 1.13 - 15.09; p = 0.03). In patients with DDIR positive tumors, there was a strong association with immune response and immune checkpoint response signatures (p < 0.0001), as well as TILs in baseline biopsies (p =0.0262). Matched baseline and mid-point (after 3 cycles of FEC chemotherapy) gene expression analysis was available for 17 non-responders and 4 responders. In responding tumors a trend to reduced immune gene expression was seen, with an associated reduction in TILs (p = 0.0573), probably reflecting eradication of DDIR positive tumor cells (decreased tumor content on midpoint specimens in responders was noted compared to non-responders (p = 0.0257)). Conversely, increased DDIR signature score was observed in non-responders post FEC chemotherapy (p = 0.0332), with a trend to increased TIL infiltration (p = 0.0792). Immune checkpoint gene expression also increased following NAC in these patients. DDIR negative non-responding tumors demonstrated upregulation of angiogenesis signatures at baseline (p < 0.01), along with higher scores for TGFβ driven immune resistance signatures (p < 0.05), suggesting other potential therapeutic approaches for these patients. Conclusions: The cGAS-STING driven DDIR gene expression assay is predictive of response to neoadjuvant DNA damaging chemotherapy and is associated with high baseline immune infiltration. In keeping with the recent TONIC trial, we note anthracycline-based treatment as a potent activator of innate immunity. In non-responders, although TIL infiltration and immune gene expression is induced by DNA damaging chemotherapy, tumors do not respond, presumably due to intact DNA repair pathways and immune checkpoint gene induction. Therefore, there is a rationale to offer this population induction anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by immune checkpoint targeting treatment to improve outcome. Citation Format: Stuart A McIntosh, Kienan I Savage, Colin James, Tong Lioe, Steven Walker, Keith Lowry, Laura Knight, Andrena McGavigan, Gemma Logan, Jane Hurwitz, Stephen J Kirk, Paul Harkin, Richard D Kennedy, Eileen E Parkes. cGAS-STING driven immune activation predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and suggests rational IO combination therapies: Results of the Neo-DDIR study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-17.

Background The TNT trial (NCT00532727) showed no evidence of carboplatin (C) superiority over docetaxel (D) overall in metastatic triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), but a C benefit was observed in the pre-specified sub-group analysis in patients with a gBRCA1/2 mutation (Tutt et al, Nat Med 2018). Given only ~30% of patients have a gBRCA1/2 mutation, broader predictive biomarkers of response are needed. In this cohort we previously found that DNA Damage Response (DDR) signatures were associated with improved C response in chemotherapy (CT) naïve patients only (Tovey et al, ASCO 2020). Since DDR activities influence tumour immune-microenvironment, we explored the predictive ability of immune cell markers and performed integrative analyses on multi-omics features to identify novel TNBC subgroups. Patients and Methods Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated on haematoxylin and eosin stained primary tumour (PT) slides for 222/376 TNT patients. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded PT tissues from 186/376 TNT patients were successfully profiled using total RNA-sequencing. Matched recurrence (REC) was also sequenced for 13 patients. Twenty-five immune signatures were assessed. Logistic regression and restricted mean progression free survival (PFS) were applied to delineate the relationship of these features with treatment outcomes. Random forest clustering of multi-omics DDR and immune biology markers, including gene expression signatures and mutation/methylation status, was applied to identify subgroups. We further molecularly characterised these clusters through supervised clustering of 693 gene expression “modules” (sets of co-expressed genes), immune cell deconvolution and genomic scars. Results Immune gene expression signatures and TILs were highly correlated. Average immune infiltration based on ConsensusTME was lower in mutated/methylated tumours compared with BRCA1 wildtype tumours (p=0.04). Immune signature score markers decreased from PT to REC, demonstrating a dynamic immune microenvironment. In the overall population and when restricting to prior CT treated patients, high immune infiltration (gene expression based & TILs) was associated with response to D while C response rates were not associated with immune scores (interaction p-values< 0.05). This did not translate to a PFS benefit. Multi-omics clustering identified 6 biological subgroups including immune enriched, immune depleted, DDR deficient and proficient clusters as well as 2 small clusters with no obvious distinguishing features. Immune enriched TNBC were predominantly basal-like immune activated with high B-cell/T-cell diversity. Immune depleted TNBC showed higher activity of proliferation and DDR pathway modules. DDR proficient tumours had low expression of immune markers and enrichment for ESR1/PGR expression, markers of extra cellular formation, cell structure, lipid metabolism and proliferation. The DDR deficient cluster was enriched for proliferation and demonstrated high number of TILs despite no apparent enrichment for gene expression-based immune modules. In the prior CT treated cohort, the immune enriched cluster had preferential response to D (62.5% (D) vs. 29.4% (C); p=0.02). The immune depleted cluster had preferential response to C (8.0% (D) vs. 40.0% (C); p=0.01). Numbers were too small to assess differential response within the other clusters or in the CT naïve cohort. Conclusions Tumours with high immune features have high response to D while those with low immune features have preferential response to C in advanced TNBC. Combining multi-omics markers of DDR deficiency and immune biology can identify clusters of patients with distinct biological profiles and differential treatment specific response rates. Citation Format: Holly Tovey, Orsolya Sipos, Katherine A Hoadley, Joel S Parker, Jelmar Quist, Sarah Kernaghan, Lucy Kilburn, Roberto Salgado, Sherene Loi, Richard D Kennedy, Ioannis Roxanis, Patrycja Gazinska, Sarah E. Pinder, Judith Bliss, Charles M. Perou, Syed Haider, Andrew Tutt, Anita Grigoriadis, Maggie Chon U Cheang. Histopathological and molecular immune landscape and DNA damage response signatures to predict response to carboplatin and docetaxel in TNT trial TNBC cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-06.

BackgroundThe efficacy of anti-angiogenic agents (AAAs) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to synthesize evidence of their comparative effectiveness for improving overall survival (OS) among EOC patients. MethodsWe searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to February 2021. We performed a NMA with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate comparative effectiveness among different AAAs in two disease settings, chemotherapy naïve, and recurrent EOC. P-score was used to provide an effectiveness hierarchy ranking. Sensitivity NMA was carried out by focusing on studies that reported high-risk disease chemotherapy-naïve, platinum-resistant, and platinum-sensitive EOC. The primary outcome was OS.FindingsWe identified 23 RCTs (n=11,560) which assessed effectiveness of eight different AAAs. NMA results showed no significant OS difference among anti-angiogenic agents in chemotherapy-naïve. In recurrent EOC, concurrent use of trebananib (10mg/kg) and chemotherapy was likely to be the best option (P-score: 0.88, NMA estimate versus chemotherapy: HR= 1.67, 95% CI: 0.94; 2.94). The sensitivity NMA indicated that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy with maintenance treatment (P-score: 0.99) and pazopanib plus chemotherapy (P-score: 0.79) had the highest probability of being the best intervention for improving OS in high-risk chemotherapy-naïve and platinum-resistant setting, respectively. InterpretationAAAs may not play a significant clinical role in chemotherapy-naïve and platinum-sensitive EOC. Conversely, the concurrent use of trebananib with chemotherapy was likely to be the best intervention in recurrent EOC.

Introduction/Aims: DDIR signature, HRD, and stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) have each been associated with favorable outcomes in early stage TNBC. We assessed the overlap between these markers and created prognostic categories based on their combined use in a prospective trial of TNBC patients uniformly treated with adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) on the SWOG S9313 trial. Methods: SWOG S9313 trial accrued 3,125 women with early stage breast cancer to two alternative dose schedules of AC, with no difference in outcomes between the two arms. 425 centrally determined TNBC cases from S9313 were identified. DDIR signature (score ≥ 0.3681 = DDIR+, Almac Diagnostic Services), HRD status (score ≥ 42 = HRD+, Myriad Genetics), and sTIL were assessed. Gene expression data (Xcel™ array) was subjected to claraT V3.0.0 biological signature analysis (Almac Diagnostic Services), and co-expression cluster analysis was used to identify signatures associated with DDIR and HRD status. The impact of dual classification by DDIR and HRD status (Group 1: DDIR+/HRD+, Group 2: DDIR+/HRD-, Group 3: DDIR-/HRD+, Group 4: DDIR-/HRD-) on disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was examined using Cox regression with adjustment for randomized treatment assignment and nodal status. Results: For the 425 patients, median age was 45 years, 33% were node-positive, and 5-year DFS and OS were 74% and 82%, respectively. DDIR and HRD status was available for 89% each, sTIL% was available for 99%, and all three markers were available for 77% (328/425) of patients. 60% were DDIR+ and 65% HRD+. Among DDIR- tumors, 58% were HRD+. sTIL% was associated with DDIR status (P Table 1Immune-Enriched GroupsImmune-Deplete GroupsGroup 1 DDIR+/HRD+ N=137 (42%)Group 2 DDIR+/HRD- N=59 (18%)Group 3 DDIR-/HRD+ N=77 (23%)Group 4 DDIR-/HRD- N=55 (17%)5-year DFS82%74%74%56%P=0.001 (Group 1 vs 4); P=0.006 (Group 2 vs 4); P=0.016 (Group 3 vs 4); P=NS (Groups 1 vs 2, 1 vs 3, and 2 vs 3)5-year OS88%86%83%69%P=0.001 (Group 1 vs 4); P=0.003 (Group 2 vs 4); P=0.026 (Group 3 vs 4); P=NS (Group 1 vs 2, 1 vs 3, and 2 vs 3)Median sTIL (%)20%20%5%5%P Citation Format: Shane R Stecklein, William Barlow, Lajos Pusztai, Kirsten Timms, Richard Kennedy, Sunil Badve, Yesim Gökmen-Polar, Peggy Porter, Hannah Linden, Debu Tripathy, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Andrew K Godwin, Alastair Thompson, Daniel Hayes, Priyanka Sharma. Classification of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) by DNA damage immune response (DDIR) signature and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status: Analysis of SWOG S9313 adjuvant trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-05.

Background: The DDRD assay was developed to prospectively identify a molecular subtype of cancers defined by DNA damage activated immune signalling. This 44-gene assay has been validated to predict response to anthracycline-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in both the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings in breast cancer. The biomarker phase Neo-DDRD trial assessed the clinical utility of this assay prospectively in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: 48 patients receiving NAC for early (T1-2, N0-1) or locally advanced non-metastatic breast cancer were recruited from March 2014 – Sept 2017. Chemotherapy regimen was selected according to local standard-of-care guidelines (FEC “100” in N0, FEC-D in N1, FEC-DH in HER2 +ve, with the addition of pertuzumab when approved). The DDRD score was applied to RNA expression data obtained from pre-treatment FFPE core biopsies using a custom cDNA microarray (Breast Cancer DSA™). Response to NAC was assessed on resection specimens following definitive surgical treatment by pathologists blinded to the DDRD scores, using the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) assessment tool. Results: Patients with a positive DDRD assay call had an odds ratio for pathological complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (RCB0/RCB1) of 4.64 (95%CI 1.31-16.42; p = 0.0174). Patients with RCB0/RCB1 had significantly higher DDRD assay score than those with class RCB2/RCB3 responses (p =0.0011; unpaired t-test). Tumour subtype and DDRD call are summarised in Table 1. In total, 29.2% of patients had a pathological complete response (pCR) (RCB0). Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed on baseline pre-treatment samples. Increasing DDRD assay score was not significantly associated with increasing stromal TILs (p=0.1403; Pearson correlation). In assessing correlation between stromal TILs and response to chemotherapy, there was no significant difference found across RCB categories (p=0.45; one way ANOVA). Table 1:tumour subtype distribution and DDRD assay resultSubtypeDDRD+DDRD-TotalTriple negative7613HER2+ ER-527HER2+ ER+6612ER+ HER2-8816 Conclusions: Preliminary results from the Neo-DDRD biomarker phase trial support the ability of the DDRD assay to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The DDRD assay was confirmed to be a better predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response than the presence of TILs. Translational work from this trial is ongoing: serial tissue and plasma samples collected at treatment mid-point and surgical resection will be used to study changes in RNA expression profiles in both DDRD assay positive and negative during chemotherapy, as well as changes in tumour immune infiltrates, peripheral chemokines and circulating tumour DNA profiles. Based on the results from this pilot study, we propose a biomarker-driven phase II trial in the neoadjuvant setting using the DDRD assay to stratify patients for treatment. Citation Format: Parkes EE, James CR, Lioe T, Walker S, Savage KI, Lowry K, Knight L, McCavigan A, Logan G, Hurwitz J, Kirk SJ, Harkin P, Kennedy RD, McIntosh SA. Biomarker phase neo-DDRD trial: Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early breast cancer using the DNA damage repair deficiency (DDRD) assay [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-12.

Graphical abstract, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is a relatively new technology that lacks standardisation. RNA-seq can be used for Differential Gene Expression (DGE) analysis, however, no consensus exists as to which methodology ensures robust and reproducible results. Indeed, it is broadly acknowledged that DGE methods provide disparate results. Despite obstacles, RNA-seq assays are in advanced development for clinical use but further optimisation will be needed. Herein, five DGE models (DESeq2, voom + limma, edgeR, EBSeq, NOISeq) for gene-level detection were investigated for robustness to sequencing alterations using a controlled analysis of fixed count matrices. Two breast cancer datasets were analysed with full and reduced sample sizes. DGE model robustness was compared between filtering regimes and for different expression levels (high, low) using unbiased metrics. Test sensitivity estimated as relative False Discovery Rate (FDR), concordance between model outputs and comparisons of a ’population’ of slopes of relative FDRs across different library sizes, generated using linear regressions, were examined. Patterns of relative DGE model robustness proved dataset-agnostic and reliable for drawing conclusions when sample sizes were sufficiently large. Overall, the non-parametric method NOISeq was the most robust followed by edgeR, voom, EBSeq and DESeq2. Our rigorous appraisal provides information for method selection for molecular diagnostics. Metrics may prove useful towards improving the standardisation of RNA-seq for precision medicine.

We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a novel anti-angiogenic peptide.We used an open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation Phase I trial design in patients with solid tumours. ALM201 was administered subcutaneously once daily for 5 days every week in unselected patients with solid tumours.Twenty (8 male, 12 female) patients with various solid tumours were treated (18 evaluable for toxicity) over eight planned dose levels (10-300 mg). ALM201 was well-tolerated at all dose levels without CTCAE grade 4 toxicities. Adverse events were predominantly grades 1-2, most commonly, localised injection-site reactions (44.4%), vomiting (11%), fatigue (16.7%), arthralgia (5.6%) and headache (11%). Thrombosis occurred in two patients at the 100 mg and 10 mg dose levels. The MTD was not reached, and a recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) based on feasibility was declared. Plasma exposure increased with dose (less than dose-proportional at the two highest dose levels). No peptide accumulation was evident. The median treatment duration was 11.1 (range 3-18) weeks. Four of 18 evaluable patients (22%) had stable disease.Doses up to 300 mg of ALM201 subcutaneously are feasible and well-tolerated. Further investigation of this agent in selected tumour types/settings would benefit from patient-selection biomarkers.

4539 Background: The Dual Erb B Inhibition in Oesophago-gastric Cancer (DEBIOC) trial reported an acceptable safety profile for neoadjuvant Xelox +/- AZD8931 but limited efficacy. We utilized EAC patient samples from DEBIOC to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant Xelox +/-AZD8931 on biological pathways using a unique software driven solution. Methods: 24 pre-treatment FFPE EAC biopsies and 17 matched surgical resection specimens were transcriptionally profiled using the Almac Diagnostics Xcel Array. Gene expression data was analyzed using the Almac claraT total mRNA report V3.0.0, reporting on 92 gene expression signatures and 7337 single genes associated with 10 key biologies. Paired Wilcoxon tests (5% significance level) were used to evaluate changes in claraT scores pre- and post-treatment. EGFR and Her2 expression were assessed by IHC and FISH. Results: 15 patients received Xelox+AZD8931 and 9 Xelox alone. Hierarchical clustering of biopsies identified 4 major clusters: Inflammation active, Genomic Instability active, EGFR & MAPK active, and EMT & Angiogenesis active. Comparison of signature scores pre- and post- neoadjuvant treatment demonstrated a significant reduction in scores relating to DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiency (Almac DNA Damage assay, p< 0.0001; BRCAness Profile, p= 0.0025; HRD Gene Signature, p< 0.0001; BRCA1ness Signature, p= 0.0004) and a significant increase in angiogenesis signatures (Almac Angiogenesis Assay, p= 0.0002; Angio Predictive G model, p= 0.0228; Angiogenesis Signature A, p= 0.0034) and EMT signatures (EMT Signature, p= 0.0031, EMT Enrichment Score, p= 0.0013, Pan-Can EMT Signature B, p= 0.0001). Comparing pre- and post-treatment signature scores in patients treated with Xelox +/-AZD8931 revealed a significant reduction in EGFR Sensitivity Signature ( p= 0.0088), ERBB2-specific Gene Expression Signature ( p= 0.0127) and Hallmark PI3K-AKT-MTOR Signaling ( p= 0.0195) in those treated with Xelox + AZD8931 in keeping with the mechanism of action of AZD8931. Downregulation of AKT signaling was confirmed in AZD8931 treated and resistant cell lines. Conclusions: We report the use of a novel software tool to apply 92 gene expression signatures to EAC biopsy and resection specimens from the DEBIOC trial to provide insight into mechanisms of action. Neoadjuvant treatment was associated with a reduction in DDR deficiency and an increase in angiogenesis and EMT signatures whilst a reduction in EGFR, Her2 and AKT pathways was noted with AZD8931 treatment.

Radical radiotherapy, often in combination with hormone ablation, is a safe and effective treatment option for localised or locally-advanced prostate cancer. However, up to 30% of patients with locally advanced PCa will go on to develop biochemical failure, within 5 years, following initial radiotherapy. Improving radiotherapy response is clinically important since patients exhibiting biochemical failure develop castrate-resistant metastatic disease for which there is no curative therapy and median survival is 8&ndash, 18 months. The aim of this research was to determine if loss of PTEN (highly prevalent in advanced prostate cancer) is a novel therapeutic target in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Previous work has demonstrated PTEN-deficient cells are sensitised to inhibitors of ATM, a key regulator in the response to DSBs. Here, we have shown the role of PTEN in cellular response to IR was both complex and context-dependent. Secondly, we have confirmed ATM inhibition in PTEN-depleted cell models, enhances ionising radiation-induced cell killing with minimal toxicity to normal prostate RWPE-1 cells. Furthermore, combined treatment significantly inhibited PTEN-deficient tumour growth compared to PTEN-expressing counterparts, with minimal toxicity observed. We have further shown PTEN loss is accompanied by increased endogenous levels of ROS and DNA damage. Taken together, these findings provide pre-clinical data for future clinical evaluation of ATM inhibitors as a neoadjuvant/adjuvant in combination with radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients harbouring PTEN mutations.

RAS mutant (MT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is resistant to MEK1/2 inhibition and remains a difficult-to-treat group. Therefore, there is an unmet need for novel treatment options for RASMT mCRC. RALA and RALB GTPases function downstream of RAS and have been found to be key regulators of several cell functions implicated in KRAS-driven tumorigenesis. However, their role as regulators of the apoptotic machinery remains to be elucidated. Here, we found that inhibition of RALB expression, but not RALA, resulted in Caspase-8-dependent cell death in KRASMT CRC cells, which was not further increased following MEK1/2 inhibition. Proteomic analysis and mechanistic studies revealed that RALB depletion induced a marked upregulation of the pro-apoptotic cell surface TRAIL Death Receptor 5 (DR5) (also known as TRAIL-R2), primarily through modulating DR5 protein lysosomal degradation. Moreover, DR5 knockdown or knockout attenuated siRALB-induced apoptosis, confirming the role of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway as a regulator of siRALB-induced cell death. Importantly, TRAIL treatment resulted in the association of RALB with the death-inducing signalling complex (DISC) and targeting RALB using pharmacologic inhibition or RNAi approaches triggered a potent increase in TRAIL-induced cell death in KRASMT CRC cells. Significantly, high RALB mRNA levels were found in the poor prognostic Colorectal Cancer Intrinsic Subtypes (CRIS)-B CRC subgroup. Collectively, this study provides to our knowledge the first evidence for a role for RALB in apoptotic priming and suggests that RALB inhibition may be a promising strategy to improve response to TRAIL treatment in poor prognostic RASMT CRIS-B CRC.

STING signaling in cancer is a crucial component of response to immunotherapy and other anti-cancer treatments. Conversely, STING signaling can promote tumor invasion and metastasis. Currently, there is no robust method of measuring STING activation in cancer. Here, we describe an immunohistochemistry-based assay with digital pathology assessment of STING in tumor cells. Using this novel approach, we identify perinuclear-localized expression of STING (pnSTING) in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer as an independent predictor of good prognosis, associated with immune cell infiltration and upregulation of immune checkpoints. Tumors with low pnSTING are immunosuppressed with increased infiltration of “M2” -polarised macrophages. In ER-disease, pnSTING does not have a significant prognostic role, and STING appears to be uncoupled from interferon responses. Importantly, a gene signature defining low pnSTING expression in ER+ disease is predictive of poor prognosis in independent datasets. Low pnSTING is associated with chromosomal instability, MYC amplification and mTOR signaling, suggesting novel therapeutic approaches for this subgroup.

PURPOSE To independently validate two biomarkers, a 44-gene DNA damage immune response (DDIR) signature and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs), as prognostic markers in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with adjuvant doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) in SWOG 9313. METHODS Four hundred twenty-five centrally determined patient cases with TNBC from S9313 were identified. DDIR signature was performed on RNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, and samples were classified as DDIR negative or positive using predefined cutoffs. Evaluation of sTILs was performed as described previously. Markers were tested for prognostic value for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression models adjusted for treatment assignment, nodal status, and tumor size. RESULTS Among 425 patients with TNBC, 33% were node positive. DDIR was tested successfully in 90% of patients (381 of 425), 62% of which were DDIR signature positive. DDIR signature positivity was associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92; P = .015) and OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.89; P = .010). sTILs density assessment was available in 99% of patients and was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.96; P = .026 for sTILs density ≥ 20% v < 20%) and OS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.85; P = .004 for sTILs density ≥ 20% v < 20%). DDIR signature score and sTILs density were moderately correlated ( r = 0.60), which precluded statistical significance for DFS in a joint model. Three-year DFS and OS in a subgroup of patients with DDIR positivity and T1c/T2N0 disease were 88% and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSION The prognostic role of sTILs and DDIR in early-stage TNBC was confirmed. DDIR signature conferred improved prognosis in two thirds of patients with TNBC treated with adjuvant AC. DDIR signature has the potential to stratify outcome and to identify patients with less projected benefit after AC chemotherapy.

BackgroundTumour cells with BRCA1/2 gene mutations demonstrate increased sensitivity to platinum and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) was found to selectively kill BRCA-defective cells in a xenograft model as effectively as the PARP inhibitor AG014699, even after these cells acquired resistance to a PARP inhibitor or cisplatin.MethodsThis phase II single-arm trial investigated the activity of 6MP 55–75 mg/m2 per day, and methotrexate 15–20 mg/m2 per week in advanced breast or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients with a BRCA1/2 germline mutation, who had progressed after ≥1 previous line of chemotherapy. The primary outcome was objective response including stable disease (SD) as an assessment of clinical benefit rate (CBR), at 8 weeks, by RECIST v1.1. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsIn total, 67 evaluable patients were recruited; 55 ovarian and 11 breast cancer patients. In total, 21 patients had SD (31%), one had a partial response (1.5%); CBR was 33% at 8 weeks. In total, 12/67 patients (18%) had SD at 16 weeks. In total, five ovarian cancer patients had SD for over 200 days. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI 6.9–14.5), median PFS 1.9 months (1.7–2.8).ConclusionsThe overall activity of 6MP and methotrexate in these patients was low; however, there was a small group of patients who appeared to derive longer-term clinical benefit.

Tumours with genomic instability demonstrate enhanced immunogenicity and potential for response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). We previously demonstrated activation of the cGAS-STING pathway following loss of DNA repair, resulting in cytokine induction, lymphocytic infiltration and immune checkpoint activation. Here we explore the role of chemotherapies in inducing this innate immune response, identifying topoisomerase II (topo-II) inhibitors, particularly doxorubicin and epirubicin, as potent inducers of a cGAS-STING dependent interferon response. Mechanistically, topo-II inhibition resulted in significant induction of cytoplasmic DNA and subsequent micronuclei formation, a requirement for efficient cGAS-STING activation and consequent cytokine and immune checkpoint gene induction. Importantly, increased cytokine and immune checkpoint gene expression, as well as increased immune cell infiltration, was also observed in patient derived breast tumour biopsies following topo-II inhibitor-based treatment. Taken together, this study indicates topo-II inhibitors such as doxorubicin, may be best placed to induce immunogenic inflammation, and thereby increase responses to ICB therapies.SignificanceThis work demonstrates how topo-II inhibitors induce STING-pathway activation, cytokine induction and immune checkpoint protein upregulation in cancer cells and provides a rationale for combining topo-II inhibitors with ICB therapy in early breast cancer.

Historically the development of anticancer treatments has been focused on their effect on tumor cells alone. However, newer treatments have shifted attention to targets on immune cells, resulting in dramatic responses. The effect of DNA repair deficiency on the microenvironment remains an area of key interest. Moreover, established therapies such as DNA damaging treatments such as chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors further modify the tumor microenvironment. Here we describe DNA repair pathways in breast cancer and activation of innate immune pathways in DNA repair deficiency, in particular, the STING (STimulator of INterferon Genes) pathway. Breast tumors with DNA repair deficiency are associated with upregulation of immune checkpoints including PD-L1 (Programmed Death Ligand-1) and may represent a target population for single agent or combination immunotherapy treatment.

Objective High grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common and most aggressive, subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. It presents as advanced stage disease with poor prognosis. Recent pathological evidence strongly suggests HGSC arises from the fallopian tube via the precursor lesion; serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). However, further definition of the molecular evolution of HGSC has major implications for both clinical management and research. This study aims to more clearly define the molecular pathogenesis of HGSC. Methods Six cases of HGSC were identified at the Northern Ireland Gynaecological Cancer Centre (NIGCC) that each contained ovarian HGSC (HGSC), omental HGSC (OMT), STIC, normal fallopian tube epithelium (FTE) and normal ovarian surface epithelium (OSE). The relevant formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples were retrieved from the pathology archive via the Northern Ireland Biobank following attaining ethical approval (NIB11:005). Full microarray-based gene expression profiling was performed on the cohort. The resulting data was analysed bioinformatically and the results were validated in a HGSC-specific in-vitro model. Results The carcinogenesis of HGSC was investigated and showed the molecular profile of HGSC to be more closely related to normal FTE than OSE. STIC lesions also clustered closely with HGSC, indicating a common molecular origin. Conclusion This study provides strong evidence suggesting that extrauterine HGSC arises from the fimbria of the distal fallopian tube. Furthermore, several potential pathways were identified which could be targeted by novel therapies for HGSC. These findings have significant translational relevance for both primary prevention and clinical management of the disease.

The PDLIM2 protein regulates stability of transcription factors including NF-κB and STATs in epithelial and hemopoietic cells. PDLIM2 is strongly expressed in certain cancer cell lines that exhibit an epithelial-to-mesenchymal phenotype, and its suppression is sufficient to reverse this phenotype. PDLIM2 supports the epithelial polarity of nontransformed breast cells, suggesting distinct roles in tumor suppression and oncogenesis. To better understand its overall function, we investigated PDLIM2 expression and activity in breast cancer. PDLIM2 protein was present in 60% of tumors diagnosed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and only 20% of other breast cancer subtypes. High PDLIM2 expression in TNBC was positively correlated with adhesion signaling and β-catenin activity. Interestingly, PDLIM2 was restricted to the cytoplasm/membrane of TNBC cells and excluded from the nucleus. In breast cell lines, PDLIM2 retention in the cytoplasm was controlled by cell adhesion, and translocation to the nucleus was stimulated by insulin-like growth factor-1 or TGFβ. Cytoplasmic PDLIM2 was associated with active β-catenin and ectopic expression of PDLIM2 was sufficient to increase β-catenin levels and its transcriptional activity in reporter assays. Suppression of PDLIM2 inhibited tumor growth in vivo, whereas overexpression of PDLIM2 disrupted growth in 3D cultures. These results suggest that PDLIM2 may serve as a predictive biomarker for a large subset of TNBC whose phenotype depends on adhesion-regulated β-catenin activity and which may be amenable to therapies that target these pathways. Significance: This study shows that PDLIM2 expression defines a subset of triple-negative breast cancer that may benefit from targeting the β-catenin and adhesion signaling pathways.

Background: BRAF mutations (BRAFMT) occur in ∼10-15% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and have a poor clinical outcome, in particular those with microsatellite stable (MSS) disease. Anti-BRAF/EGFR combinations have shown some increases in response rate, but this is associated with minor increases in overall survival. There is an unmet need to understand the biology of poor prognostic BRAFMT CRC. Using publicly available gene expression data from 155 CRC cell lines (GSE59857), we recently identified that unfolded protein response (UPR) and DNA repair are dominant pathways deregulated in the consensus molecular subgroup 1/BRAFMT subgroup. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of BOLD-100, an inhibitor of the UPR regulator GRP78, in regulating the survival of CRC cells. Methods: A panel of isogenic paired and non-isogenic V600E BRAFMT and BRAFWT cells were used. BOLD-100, a ruthenium-based small molecule inhibitor, was obtained from BOLD Therapeutics. Cell Titre Glo, Flow Cytometry, Western blotting, Caspase 8, 3/7 activity, RNAi assays were used. RNA seq and IPA bioinformatic analyses were performed on BOLD-100-treated BRAFMT/WT CRC cells. A compound library including small molecules approved by the FDA was used. Results: In vitro CellTitre-Glo® and Annexin V/PI sensitivity studies showed that the BRAFMT, MSS CRC cells were highly sensitive to BOLD-100 with IC50 values between 9.25-31μM. Treatment with BOLD-100 resulted in early decreases in GRP78 levels and increases in expression levels of the endoplasmic reticulum stress protein CHOP, and this was associated with caspase-8 dependent cell death in the BRAFMT CRC cells. Notably, silencing of CHOP did not abrogate BOLD-100-induced cell death in BRAFMT CRC cells, indicating that the UPR pathway played no role in the cell death following BOLD-100. RNA seq and IPA analysis showed that cell cycle regulation and DNA repair were the most significant deregulated pathways following BOLD-100 treatment. Further mechanistic studies revealed that BOLD-100 induced rapid and potent increases in pATRT1989, pChk1S345 and γH2AX expression levels in BRAFMT cells. Using a small molecule compound library, we found that the ATR inhibitors AZD6783 and M4344 resulted in strong synergy and apoptosis when combined with BOLD-100, in particular in BRAFMT CRC cells. Moreover, we found that the ROS scavenger NAC abrogated BOLD-100 induced CHOP, pATRT1989, pChk1S345 and γH2AX levels and rescued cell death following BOLD-100 treatment in BRAFMT CRC cells. Conclusions: Taken together, we have identified a role for BOLD-100 in regulating the survival of BRAFMT CRC cells. Our data support further studies with BOLD-100, in particular in combination with ATRi, for the treatment of BRAFMT CRC tumours. Citation Format: Robbie Carson, Shivaali Karelia, Deborah Lavin, Vijay Tiwari, Richard Kennedy, Kienan Savage, Adam Carie, Jim Pankovich, Mark Bazett, Sandra Van Schaeybroeck. Targeting the DNA repair pathway with BOLD-100 in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1183.

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is emerging as a promising predictive biomarker to select cancer patients who will benefit from immunotherapy. However, accurate TMB estimation from sequencing data remains hampered by the ability to correctly distinguish somatic variants from both germline variants and spurious base changes introduced by sample preparation and sequencing processes. The latter is particularly prevalent in poor quality FFPE material where degradation and chemical modifications of the DNA manifest as variant artefacts leading to over-estimation of TMB. One method of removing germline variants and artefacts is to compare tumor variant calls to those obtained from matched normal tissue, however inclusion of a matched normal adds significant logistical and financial challenges to clinical trial assays. Therefore, there remains a critical need to establish alternative approaches enabling accurate TMB estimation from FFPE tumor-only samples. To address these challenges, we have developed a tumor-only somatic variant calling pipeline for accurate determination of TMB from FFPE material profiled by whole exome sequencing (WES). The process is underpinned by two key features (a) enhanced germline variant filtering that uses a systematic rule-based strategy, (b) FFPE artefact removal using an ensemble machine learning model incorporating multiple variant call QC parameters. The germline filtering approach was developed on a matched fresh frozen (FF)/FFPE/blood dataset of 23 cancer patients. The FFPE artefact filtering model was built on a dataset of 59 FF and FFPE matched pairs, where FFPE artefacts were defined as variants present in FFPE but absent in the FF sample. Benchmarked against internal and TCGA datasets of somatic variant calls from >30 FF samples with a matched normal, our germline and FFPE filtering steps decreased false discovery rates by over 20%. This translated into improved TMB scoring performance with tumor-only pipeline estimates from three SeraCare reference standards closely matching expected TMB scores. Critically, we establish the clinical relevance of our approach on a published cohort of 98 patients treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Here we observed increased association between patient response and TMB estimated from our pipeline (p=0.042) compared to a standard pipeline with no enhanced germline or FFPE artefact filters (p=0.56). Overall, our combined germline and FFPE artefact filtering pipeline results in significantly improved somatic variant detection and TMB scoring performance in FFPE samples where a matched normal is unavailable. It is applicable across multiple disease types and adaptable to other platforms. Therefore, the pipeline has utility in clinical laboratories where accurate somatic variant detection is crucial to successful deployment of predictive biomarkers such as TMB. Citation Format: Hui Sun Leong, Emma O'Connor, Nuala McCabe, Sinead Donegan, Steven M. Walker, Jayna Mistry, Karen Keating, Denis P. Harkin, Richard D. Kennedy, Laura A. Knight, James R. Bradford. A machine learning approach to detect FFPE artefacts leads to accurate estimation of tumor mutational burden from sequencing data without a matched normal [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 152.

One of the most significant discoveries in cancer treatment over the past 15 years has been the advent of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and their exploitation of the concept of synthetic lethality in the treatment of BRCA1/2 mutant cancers (1,2). In synthetic lethality, the loss of each gene or protein by itself does not affect cell viability, but the loss of both results in cell death. The goal of this approach is to optimise targeted tumor cell death, while sparing normal tissue (the “magic bullet” first proposed by Paul Ehlrich in the late 19th century). PARP inhibitors in BRCA1/2 mutant tumors have been the classical example of this, where the loss of homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair through BRCA1/2 mutation renders cells sensitive to inhibition or loss of PARP1.

Purpose Conventional staging methods are inadequate to identify patients with stage II colon cancer (CC) who are at high risk of recurrence after surgery with curative intent. ColDx is a gene expression, microarray-based assay shown to be independently prognostic for recurrence-free interval (RFI) and overall survival in CC. The objective of this study was to further validate ColDx using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens collected as part of the Alliance phase III trial, C9581. Patients and Methods C9581 evaluated edrecolomab versus observation in patients with stage II CC and reported no survival benefit. Under an initial case-cohort sampling design, a randomly selected subcohort (RS) comprised 514 patients from 901 eligible patients with available tissue. Forty-nine additional patients with recurrence events were included in the analysis. Final analysis comprised 393 patients: 360 RS (58 events) and 33 non-RS events. Risk status was determined for each patient by ColDx. The Self-Prentice method was used to test the association between the resulting ColDx risk score and RFI adjusting for standard prognostic variables. Results Fifty-five percent of patients (216 of 393) were classified as high risk. After adjustment for prognostic variables that included mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, ColDx high-risk patients exhibited significantly worse RFI (multivariable hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P < .01). Age and MMR status were marginally significant. RFI at 5 years for patients classified as high risk was 82% (95% CI, 79% to 85%), compared with 91% (95% CI, 89% to 93%) for patients classified as low risk. Conclusion ColDx is associated with RFI in the C9581 subsample in the presence of other prognostic factors, including MMR deficiency. ColDx could be incorporated with the traditional clinical markers of risk to refine patient prognosis.