Search

Limited evidence suggests chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) increases healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. However, this burden has not been well characterized in England. This study assesses secondary care HCRU and costs for patients following allo HSCT in England with cGvHD and patients who did not develop graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Further stratification was performed among patients who did or did not subsequently receive high-cost therapies for the treatment of cGvHD. This descriptive, retrospective cohort study used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from April 2017 to March 2022. HES data captures information on reimbursed diagnoses and procedures from all National Health Service (NHS) secondary care admissions and attendances in England. High-cost drugs as defined by NHS England are recorded in HES, these drugs and other procedures including plasma exchange, were used to identify patients with cGvHD who were in receipt of high-cost therapies. HCRU and costs were described for patients with cGvHD following allo-HSCT (n = 721) and were matched with patients with no evidence of GvHD following allo-HSCT (n = 718). HCRU and costs were also described for the subset of patients with cGvHD (n = 198) following receipt of high-cost therapies and patients with cGvHD prior to or without such therapies (n = 523). A higher proportion of patients with cGvHD had at least one inpatient or intensive care unit (ICU) admission or emergency care attendance than patients without GvHD (inpatient: 74.6% versus 66.6%; emergency care: 39.3% versus 30.5%; ICU: 7.4% versus 4.7%; respectively); whilst the proportion of patients with an outpatient attendance were similar for both groups (outpatient: 80.3% versus 84.1%; respectively). The cost across all secondary care settings was higher for patients with cGvHD than patients without GvHD, with a mean cost of inpatient admissions of £17,339 per patient-year for those with cGvHD versus £8548 per patient-year in patients without GvHD. A higher proportion of patients who received high-cost therapies for the treatment of cGvHD had at least one secondary care admission or attendance, than patients who did not (inpatient: 85.4% versus 66.4%; ICU: 7.1% versus 5.4%; outpatient: 87.9% versus 76.7%; emergency care: 44.4% versus 36.5%; respectively). Patients who were treated with high-cost therapies for the treatment of cGvHD had a greater mean number (14.6 versus 8.2 per patient-year, respectively) for all-cause inpatient admissions after treatment than patients who did not. In all secondary care settings, the total cost per patient-year was higher for patients who received high-cost therapies for the treatment of cGvHD, than for those who did not. Patients who were treated with high-cost therapies for the treatment of cGvHD had a greater mean cost (£21,137 versus £15,956 per patient-year, respectively) for all-cause inpatient admissions than patients who did not. This study demonstrates that cGvHD and the use of associated high-cost therapies impacts healthcare activity and costs across various secondary care settings in England more than patients without GvHD and patients with cGvHD who received no high-cost therapies., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) prevalence is steadily increasing, in part due to increased multimorbidity in our aging global population. When progression to kidney failure cannot be avoided, people need unbiased information to inform decisions about whether to start dialysis, if or when indicated, or continue with holistic person-centred care without dialysis (conservative kidney management). Comparisons suggest that while there may be some survival benefit from dialysis over conservative kidney management, in people aged 80 years and over, or with multiple health problems or frailty, this may be at the expense of quality of life, hospitalisations, symptom burden and preferred place of death. Prepare for Kidney Care aims to compare preparation for a renal dialysis pathway with preparation for a conservative kidney management pathway, in relation to quantity and quality of life in multimorbid, frail, older people with advanced CKD., Methods: This is a two-arm, superiority, parallel group, non-blinded, individual-level, multi-centre, pragmatic trial, set in United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) kidney units. Patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , not due to acute kidney injury) who are (a) 80 years of age and over regardless of frailty or multimorbidity, or (b) 65-79 years of age if they are frail or multimorbid, are randomised 1:1 to 'prepare for responsive management', a protocolised form of conservative kidney management, or 'prepare for renal dialysis'. An integrated QuinteT Recruitment Intervention is included. The primary outcome is mean total number of quality-adjusted life years during an average follow-up of 3 years. The primary analysis is a modified intention-to-treat including all participants contributing at least one quality of life measurement. Secondary outcomes include survival, patient-reported outcomes, physical functioning, relative/carer reported outcomes and qualitative assessments of treatment arm acceptability. Cost-effectiveness is estimated from (i) NHS and personal social services and (ii) societal perspectives., Discussion: This randomised study is designed to provide high-quality evidence for frail, multimorbid, older patients with advanced CKD choosing between preparing for dialysis or conservative kidney management, and healthcare professionals and policy makers planning the related services., Trial Registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN17133653 ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17133653 ). Registered 31 May 2017., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: There is a need for robust evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of domestic abuse perpetrator programmes in reducing abusive behaviour and improving wellbeing for victim/survivors. While any randomised controlled trial can present difficulties in terms of recruitment and retention, conducting such a trial with domestic abuse perpetrators is particularly challenging. This paper reports the pilot and feasibility trial of a voluntary domestic abuse perpetrator group programme in the United Kingdom., Methods: This was a pragmatic individually randomised pilot and feasibility trial with an integrated qualitative study in one site (covering three local-authority areas) in England. Male perpetrators were randomised to either the intervention or usual care. The intervention was a 23-week group programme for male perpetrators in heterosexual relationships, with an average of three one-to-one sessions, and one-to-one support for female current- or ex-partners delivered by third sector organisations. There was no active control treatment for men, and partners of control men were signposted towards domestic abuse support services. Data were collected at three-monthly intervals for nine months from male and female participants. The main objectives assessed were recruitment, randomisation, retention, data completeness, fidelity to the intervention model, and acceptability of the trial design., Results: This study recruited 36 men (22 randomly allocated to attend the intervention group programme, 14 to usual care), and 15 current- or ex-partners (39% of eligible partners). Retention and completeness of data were high: 67% of male (24/36), and 80% (12/15) of female participants completed the self-reported questionnaire at nine months. A framework for assessing fidelity to the intervention was developed. In interviews, men who completed all or most of the intervention gave positive feedback and reported changes in their own behaviour. Partners were also largely supportive of the trial and were positive about the intervention. Participants who were not allocated to the intervention group reported feeling disappointed but understood the rationale for the trial., Conclusions: It was feasible to recruit, randomise and retain male perpetrators and female victim/survivors of abuse and collect self-reported outcome data. Participants were engaged in the intervention and reported positive benefits. The trial design was seen as acceptable., Trial Registration: ISRCTN71797549, submitted 03/08/2017, retrospectively registered 27/05/2022., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To assess gender, ethnicity, and deprivation-based differences in provision of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in England for adults with aortic stenosis (AS)., Methods: We retrospectively identified adults with AS from the English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) between April 2016 and March 2019 and those who subsequently had an AVR. We separately used HES-linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to identify people with AVR and evaluate the timeliness of their procedure (CPRD-AVR cohort). ORs for AVR in people with an AS diagnosis were estimated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, region and comorbidity. AVR was considered timely if performed electively and without evidence of cardiac decompensation before AVR., Results: 183 591 adults with AS were identified in HES; of these, 31 436 underwent AVR. The CPRD-AVR cohort comprised 10 069 adults. Women had lower odds of receiving AVR compared with men (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.66); as did people of black (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.82) or South Asian (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.82) compared with people of white ethnicities. People in the most deprived areas were less likely to receive AVR than the least deprived areas (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). Timely AVR occurred in 65% of those of white ethnicities compared with 55% of both those of black and South Asian ethnicities. 77% of the least deprived had a timely procedure compared with 58% of the most deprived; there was no gender difference., Conclusions: In this large, national dataset, female gender, black or South Asian ethnicities and high deprivation were associated with significantly reduced odds of receiving AVR in England. A lower proportion of people of minority ethnicities or high deprivation had a timely procedure. Public health initiatives may be required to increase clinician and public awareness of unconscious biases towards minority and vulnerable populations to ensure timely AVR for everyone., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CTR and SPO'C were employed by CorEvitas (Specialty EMR Data division), which was funded by Medtronic to conduct this research. SB is an employee of Medtronic. DJB is a consultant and proctor for Medtronic. CEA has received honoraria from Medtronic. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Biotherapeutics are an important class of molecules for the treatment of a wide range of diseases. They include low molecular weight peptides, highly engineered protein scaffolds and monoclonal antibodies. During their discovery and development, assessments of the biophysical attributes is critical to understanding the solution behavior of therapeutic proteins and for de-risking liabilities. Thus, methods that can quantify, characterize, and provide a basis to inform risks and drive the selection of more optimal antibody and alternative scaffolds are needed. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a technique that provides a means to probe antibody and antibody-like molecules in solution, at atomic resolution, under any formulated conditions. Here, all samples were profiled at natural abundance requiring no isotope enrichment. We present a numerical approach that quantitates two-dimensional methyl spectra. The approach was tested with a reference dataset that contained different types of antibody and antibody-like molecules. This dataset was processed through a procedure we call a Random Sampling of NMR Peaks for Covariance Analysis. This analysis revealed that the first two components were well correlated with the hydrodynamic radius of the molecules included in the reference set. Higher-order principal components were also linked to dynamic features between different tethered antibody-like molecules and contributed to decisions around candidate selection. The reference set provides a basis to characterize molecules with unknown solution behavior and is sensitive to the behavior of a molecule formulated under different conditions. The approach is independent of protein design, scaffold, formulation and provides a facile method to quantify solution behavior.

Introduction: Surgery (oesophagectomy), with neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, is the main curative treatment for patients with oesophageal cancer. Several surgical approaches can be used to remove an oesophageal tumour. The Ivor Lewis (two-phase procedure) is usually used in the UK. This can be performed as an open oesophagectomy (OO), a laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy (LAO) or a totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (TMIO). All three are performed in the National Health Service, with LAO and OO the most common. However, there is limited evidence about which surgical approach is best for patients in terms of survival and postoperative health-related quality of life., Methods and Analysis: We will undertake a UK multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare LAO with OO in adult patients with oesophageal cancer. The primary outcome is patient-reported physical function at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively and 3 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include: postoperative complications, survival, disease recurrence, other measures of quality of life, spirometry, success of patient blinding and quality assurance measures. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed comparing LAO with OO. We will embed a randomised substudy to evaluate the safety and evolution of the TMIO procedure and a qualitative recruitment intervention to optimise patient recruitment. We will analyse the primary outcome using a multi-level regression model. Patients will be monitored for up to 3 years after their surgery., Ethics and Dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the South-West Franchay Research Ethics Committee. We will submit the results for publication in a peer-reviewed journal., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN10386621., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

The human CST (Ctc1, Stn1 and Ten1) complex binds the telomeric overhang and regulates telomere length by promoting C-strand replication and inhibiting telomerase-dependent G-strand synthesis. Structural and biochemical studies on the human Stn1 and Ten1 complex revealed its mechanism of assembly and nucleic acid binding. However, little is known about the structural organization of the multi-domain Ctc1 protein and how each of these domains contribute to telomere length regulation. Here, we report the structure of a central domain of human Ctc1. The structure reveals a canonical OB-fold with the two identified disease mutations (R840W and V871M) contributing to the fold of the protein. In vitro assays suggest that although this domain is not contributing directly to Ctc1's substrate binding properties, it affects full-length Ctc1 localization to telomeres and Stn1-Ten1 binding. Moreover, functional assays show that deletion of the entire OB-fold domain leads to significant increase in telomere length, frequency of internal single G-strands and fragile telomeres. Our findings demonstrate that a previously unknown OB-fold domain contributes to efficient Ctc1 telomere localization and chromosome end maintenance., (© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)

Employing electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy, we have characterized the radicals formed in 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (3'-AZT) and in its 5'-analog 5'-azido-5'-deoxythymidine (5'-AZT) after electron attachment in gamma-irradiated aqueous (H(2)O or D(2)O) glassy (7.5 M LiCl) systems. ESR spectral studies and theoretical calculations show that the predominant site of electron capture in 3'-AZT and in 5'-AZT is at the azide group and not at the thymine moiety. The azide group in AZT is therefore more electron affinic than the most electron affinic DNA base, thymine. Electron attachment to 3'-AZT and 5'-AZT results in an unstable azide anion radical intermediate (RN(3)*(-)) that is too short-lived to be observed in our work even at 77 K. At 77 K, we observe the neutral aminyl radical (RNH*) after loss of N(2) from RN(3)*(-) followed by protonation of nitrene anion radical (RN*(-)) to give RNH*. The expected RN*(-) intermediate is not observed as protonation from water is complete at 77 K even under highly basic conditions. Formation of RND* in D(2)O solutions confirms water as the source of the NH proton in the RNH*. Our assignments to these radicals are aided by DFT calculations for hyperfine coupling constants that closely match the experimental values. On annealing to higher temperatures (ca. 160-170 K), RNH* undergoes bimolecular hydrogen abstraction reactions from the thymine methyl group and the sugar moiety resulting in the formation of the thymine allyl radical (UCH(2)*) and two sugar radicals, C3'* and C5'*. RNH* also results in one-electron oxidation of the guanine base in 3'-AZG. This work provides a potential mechanism for the reported radiosensitization effects of AZT.