Search

Purpose: In the phase 2 REGOMA trial, regorafenib improved overall survival, as compared with lomustine, in glioblastoma (GBM) patients at first progression after chemoradiation. Recently, some real-life trials showed similar impact on survival but a higher rate of adverse events than in REGOMA, thus raising concerns over tolerability. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a lower intensity regorafenib regimen. Patients and Methods: Regorafenib daily dose was gradually increased from 80 to 160 mg across the first 2 cycles. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as time from regorafenib initiation and disease progression or death. Results: Sixty-six GBM patients were included. Median age was 60.0 years. Median PFS and OS following regorafenib were 2.7 and 7.1 months, respectively. Best RANO response to regorafenib were partial response (PR) in 10 (15.1%), stable disease in 17 (25.8%), and progressive disease in 39 (59.1%) patients. Forty-six (69.7%) patients presented adverse events of any grade, and 21 (31.8%) grade 3-4 toxicity. In a multivariable analysis, higher age and absence of MGMTp methylation were significantly associated with poorer disease control after regorafenib. Conclusions: Our study is the largest observational real-life study on the use of regorafenib. Our lower intensity regimen proved as effective as the standard 160 mg daily schedule (mPFS and mOS being 2.7 vs 2.0 months and 7.1 vs 7.4 months in our study vs REGOMA, respectively). Moreover, we observed a higher rate of PRs as compared with REGOMA (15.0% versus 3.0%).

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Purpose of Review To summarize the mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy, and the influence on tumor microenvironment. Recent Findings Several clinical trials have investigated the activity of anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in glioblastoma, shedding the light on their limitations in terms of disease control and survival. We have outlined the mechanisms of resistance to antiangiogenic therapy, including vessel co-option, hypoxic signaling in response to vessel destruction, modulation of glioma stem cells, and trafficking of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor microenvironment. Moreover, novel generation of antiangiogenic compounds for glioblastoma, including small interfering RNAs and nanoparticles, as a delivery vehicle, could enhance selectivity and reduce side effects of treatments. Summary There is still a rationale for the use of antiangiogenic therapy, but a better understanding of vascular co-option, vascular mimicry, and dynamic relationships between immunosuppressive microenvironment and blood vessel destruction is crucial to develop next-generation antiangiogenic compounds.

SummaryTrastuzumab deruxtecan is a HER2-directed antibody–drug conjugate with ability to cross the blood–tumor barrier and activity on brain metastases. To test the activity of new drugs, patient-derived xenograft models from human brain metastases and phase 0 and window-of-opportunity trials are of utmost importance.See related article by Kabraji et al., p. 174

Purpose of Review To review state of art and relevant advances in the molecular genetics and management of ependymomas of children and adults. Recent Findings Ependymomas may occur either in the brain or in the spinal cord. Compared with intracranial ependymomas, spinal ependymomas are less frequent and exhibit a better prognosis. The new WHO classification of CNS tumors of 2021 has subdivided ependymomas into different histomolecular subgroups with different outcome. The majority of studies have shown a major impact of extent of resection; thus, a complete resection must be performed, whenever possible, at first surgery or at reoperation. Conformal radiotherapy is recommended for grade 3 or incompletely resected grade II tumors. Proton therapy is increasingly employed especially in children to reduce the risk of neurocognitive and endocrine sequelae. Craniospinal irradiation is reserved for metastatic disease. Chemotherapy is not useful as primary treatment and is commonly employed as salvage treatment for patients failing surgery and radiotherapy. Summary Standard treatments are still the mainstay of treatment: the discovery of new druggable pathways will hopefully increase the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future.

Background: Median survival with glioblastoma remains in the range of 12 months on population levels. Only few patients survive for more than 5 years. Patient and disease features associated with long-term survival remain poorly defined. Methods: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1419 (ETERNITY) is a registry study supported by the Brain Tumor Funders Collaborative in the US and the EORTC Brain Tumor Group. Patients with glioblastoma surviving at least 5 years from diagnosis were identified at 24 sites in Europe, US, and Australia. In patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype tumours, prognostic factors were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. A population-based reference cohort was obtained from the Cantonal cancer registry Zurich. Results: At the database lock of July 2020, 280 patients with histologically centrally confirmed glioblastoma (189 IDH wildtype, 80 IDH mutant, 11 incompletely characterised) had been registered. In the IDH wildtype population, median age was 56 years (range 24–78 years), 96 patients (50.8%) were female, 139 patients (74.3%) had tumours with O 6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Median overall survival was 9.9 years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 7.9–11.9). Patients without recurrence experienced longer median survival (not reached) than patients with one or more recurrences (8.92 years) (p < 0.001) and had a high rate (48.8%) of MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumours. Conclusions: Freedom from progression is a powerful predictor of overall survival in long-term survivors with glioblastoma. Patients without relapse often have MGMT promoter-unmethylated glioblastoma and may represent a distinct subtype of glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, scientific congresses are increasingly being organised as virtual congresses. In May 2020, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) held a VC, free-of-charge. In the absence of systematic studies on this topic, the aim of this study is to evaluate the attendance and perceived quality of the 2020 EAN virtual congress (VC) compared to the 2019 EAN face-to-face congress (FFC). METHODS Analysis of demographic data of participants obtained from the online registration collected. Comparison of the two congresses based on a survey with questions on the perception of speakers' performance, quality of networking, and other aspects. RESULTS Of 43,596 registered participants, 20,694 active participants attended the VC. Compared to 2019, the number of participants tripled (6916 in 2019) and the cumulated number of participants attending the sessions was five times higher (169,334 in 2020 vs 33,024 in 2019). Out of active participants 55% were from outside Europe, 42% were board-certified neurologists (FFC: 80%), and 21% were students (FFC: 0.6%). The content of the congress was evaluated as 'above expectation' by 56% of the attendees (FFC: 41%). Out of the respondents who had been exposed to earlier EAN congresses 73% preferred the FFC congress compared to the VC (17%). CONCLUSION The VC fulfilled the main mission of organizing high quality EAN congresses despite the restrictions of the impersonal format. The geographical distribution of the participants prove the expected higher inclusivity of a VC. The large participation of students and neurologists in training opens new educational potentials for the EAN.

The management of primary central nervous system (PCNSL) is one of the most controversial topics in neuro-oncology because of the complexity of the disease and the limited number of controlled studies available. In 2021, given recent advances and the publication of practice-changing randomized trials, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) created a multidisciplinary task force to update the previously published evidence-based guidelines for immunocompetent adult patients with PCNSL and added a section on immunosuppressed patients. The guideline provides consensus considerations and recommendations for the treatment of PCNSL, including intraocular manifestations and specific management of the elderly. The main changes from the previous guideline include strengthened evidence for the consolidation with ASCT in first-line treatment, prospectively assessed chemotherapy combinations for both young and elderly patients, clarification of the role of rituximab even though the data remain inconclusive, of the role of new agents, and the incorporation of immunosuppressed patients and primary ocular lymphoma. The guideline should aid the clinicians in everyday practice and decision making and serve as a basis for future research in the field.

Many studies in patients with brain tumors evaluating innovative PET tracers have been published in recent years, and the initial results are promising. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) PET working group provides an overview of the literature on novel investigational PET tracers for brain tumor patients. Furthermore, newer indications of more established PET tracers for the evaluation of glucose metabolism, amino acid transport, hypoxia, cell proliferation, and others are also discussed. Based on the preliminary findings, these novel investigational PET tracers should be further evaluated considering their promising potential. In particular, novel PET probes for imaging of translocator protein and somatostatin receptor overexpression as well as for immune system reactions appear to be of additional clinical value for tumor delineation and therapy monitoring. Progress in developing these radiotracers may contribute to improving brain tumor diagnostics and advancing clinical translational research.

BACKGROUND STAT3 expression in peritumoral reactive astrocytes (RA) of brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer (BC) may favor a pro-metastatic environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty-five BM specimens from BC were identified from the biobank of Pathology Unit of University of Turin and Spanish national BrM network (RENACER). pSTAT3 expression was scored in RA of peritumoral tissue according to Priego et al. (Nat Med 2018). Clinical, molecular data, and intracranial progression (i-PFS) were retrospectively retrieved. RESULTS Median age was of 54 years (range 30–81). Immunohistochemistry for GFAP and pSTAT3 was feasible in 68/85 (80%). 15/68 patients (21.1%) had BM from luminal BC, 27/68 (39.7%) from HER2-positive BC, and 26/68 (39.2%) from TNBC. 56/68 (82.4%) showed positive staining of pSTAT3, of which 9/68 (13.3%) scored with 3, 26/68 (38.2%) with 2, 21/68 (30.9%%) with 1, and 12/68 (17.6%) with 0 (negative). High pSTAT3 expression (score 2-3) was observed in 17/27 (62.9%) BM from HER2-positive BC and in 15/26 (57.7%) BM from TNBC, while most of BM from luminal BC (12/15 – 80%) had low or absent pSTAT3 (score 0-1) (p=0.021). Overall i-PFS was 16 months (range 7-41): low pSTAT3 BM (score 0-1) had a median i-PFS of 21 months versus 12 months for high pSTAT3 BM (score 2-3). A shorter median i-PFS was observed in high pSTAT3 BM from TNBC (4 months) as compared with low pSTAT3 BM (11 months). Conversely, i-PFS of high pSTAT3 BM (7 months) was similar to low pSTAT3 BM (6 months) in HER2-positive BC. CONCLUSION pSTAT3 expression in RA of peritumoral tissue of BM from TNBC and HER2-positive BC is higher than in BM from luminal BC. Of note, patients with high pSTAT3 BM from TNBC progressed earlier in comparison with those with low pSTAT3, suggesting that pSTAT3 expression has an influence on the outcome.

The incidence of gliomas is increasing in elderly patients. Clinical factors, such as age, performance status, and comorbidities contribute when choosing adequate treatment in older patients.This review covers the main pathological and molecular features of gliomas in elderly patients, as well as the neurological and geriatric assessment to select patients for surgery and antineoplastic treatments. The results from the most relevant clinical trials in both lower-grade (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs) are reviewed.Different clinical and biological factors need to be integrated into prognostic scales in order to better stratify the elderly population. Both Stupp and Perry regimens can be proposed to fit patients with GBM aged70 years. Conversely, for patients aged ≥ 70 years, the Perry regimen should be preferred. For unfit and frail patients, temozolomide alone when MGMT is methylated or hypofractionated RT alone when MGMT is unmethylated, are the optimal choice. Few data are available regarding the optimal management of elderly patients with LGGs. The benefit of an extensive resection and presence of methylation of the MGMT promoter need to be further investigated to confirm their role in improving the OS.

Background: Leptomeningeal metastasis is a neurological complication from HER2-positive breast cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study has evaluated the activity of neratinib in association with capecitabine in 10 patients with LM from HER2-positive BC after the failure of multiple lines of treatment, including trastuzumab-based therapy, within a compassionate program, and a comparison was made with a historical control group of 10 patients. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with histological diagnosis of primary HER2-positive BC, either amplified or mutated, and newly-diagnosed LM were enrolled. Coexistence of BM that has or has not received radiotherapy, as well as prior chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or monoclonal HER2-targeting antibodies or antibody–drug conjugates, were allowed, with the exclusion of lapatinib. Results: Six-months OS was 60% with a median OS of 10 months (95% CI: 2.00–17.0). Three-month intracranial PFS was 60% with a median intracranial PFS of 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.00–6.0). The neurological benefit was observed in 70% of patients with a median duration of neurological response of 6.5 months. The best radiological response was stable disease in 60% of patients. Conclusions: This small series shows that the combination of neratinib and capecitabine is a safe treatment in LM from heavily pretreated HER2-positive BC with clinical efficacy in some patients and is worth investigating in a larger study.

Background No systemic treatment has been established for meningioma progressing after local therapies. Methods This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II study included adult patients with recurrent WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma. Patients were 2:1 randomly assigned to intravenous trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) or local standard of care (LOC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), objective radiological response, safety, quality of life (QoL) assessment using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires, and we performed tissue-based exploratory molecular analyses. Results Ninety patients were randomized (n = 29 in LOC, n = 61 in trabectedin arm). With 71 events, median PFS was 4.17 months in the LOC and 2.43 months in the trabectedin arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42; 80% CI, 1.00-2.03; P = .294) with a PFS-6 rate of 29.1% (95% CI, 11.9%-48.8%) and 21.1% (95% CI, 11.3%-32.9%), respectively. Median OS was 10.61 months in the LOC and 11.37 months in the trabectedin arm (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.54-1.76; P = .94). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 44.4% of patients in the LOC and 59% of patients in the trabectedin arm. Enrolled patients had impeded global QoL and overall functionality and high fatigue before initiation of systemic therapy. DNA methylation class, performance status, presence of a relevant co-morbidity, steroid use, and right hemisphere involvement at baseline were independently associated with OS. Conclusions Trabectedin did not improve PFS and OS and was associated with higher toxicity than LOC treatment in patients with non-benign meningioma. Tumor DNA methylation class is an independent prognostic factor for OS.

BACKGROUND Medulloblastoma is a highly malignant, embryonal tumor, which is rare in adults, and shows distinct clinical, histopathological, molecular and treatment response features. METHODS We retrospectively investigated 44 adults (age 17-48 years) with an histological diagnosis of medulloblastoma, and in 23 immunohistochemistry was used to identif y the molecular subgroups. We analyzed demographic, diagnostic, therapeutic and cognitive data, and correlated with PFS (progression-free-survival) and OS (overall survival). RESULTS We observed a male prevalence and a median age of 31 years. Symptoms at onset were related to infratentorial location, while myeloradicular and/or cranial nerve involvement was rare. Histological examination showed the classic variant in 75% of patients, the desmoplastic/nodular in 23% and the anaplastic in one. As for molecular diagnosis, 17 patients were SHH and 6 non-WNT/non-SHH (5 group 4 and 1 group 3), while no WNT subgroup was found. The SHH subgroup had a prevalence of high-risk patients and leptomeningeal involvement. Patients underwent grosstotal or subtotal/partial resection, and craniospinal irradiation, followed in 20 cases by adjuvant chemotherapy. Median OS and PFS were 16.9 and 12 years, respectively. Metastatic disease at presentation and subtotal/partial resection were associated with worse prognosis, while the addition of chemotherapy did not yield a significant advantage over radiotherapy alone. Cognitive impairment in long-term survivors was limited and late relapses occurred in 15% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Future studies with adequate sample size and long-term follow-up should prospectively investigate the role of surgery and adjuvant therapies across the different molecular subgroups to see whether a personalized approach is feasible.

The presence of barriers, such as the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and brain–tumor barrier (BTB), limits the penetration of antineoplastic drugs into the brain, resulting in poor response to treatments. Many techniques have been developed to overcome the presence of these barriers, including direct injections of substances by intranasal or intrathecal routes, chemical modification of drugs or constituents of BBB, inhibition of efflux pumps, physical disruption of BBB by radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (EMP), laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT), focused ultrasounds (FUS) combined with microbubbles and convection enhanced delivery (CED). However, most of these strategies have been tested only in preclinical models or in phase 1–2 trials, and none of them have been approved for treatment of brain tumors yet. Concerning the treatment of brain metastases, many molecules have been developed in the last years with a better penetration across BBB (new generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors like osimertinib for non-small-cell lung carcinoma and neratinib/tucatinib for breast cancer), resulting in better progression-free survival and overall survival compared to older molecules. Promising studies concerning neural stem cells, CAR-T (chimeric antigen receptors) strategies and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors are ongoing.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), a multi‐organ disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), continues to challenge health and care systems around the globe. The pandemic has disrupted acute neurology services and routine patient care and has impacted the clinical course in patients with chronic neurological disease. COVID‐19 appears to have exposed inequalities of societies and healthcare systems and had a disproportionate impact on already vulnerable communities. The next challenge will be to set up initiatives to stop disparities in all aspects related to COVID‐19. From the medical perspective, there is a need to consider inequalities in prevention, treatment and long‐term consequences. Some of the issues of direct relevance to neurologists are summarised. With this appraisal, the European Academy of Neurology NeuroCOVID‐19 Task Force intends to raise awareness of the potential impact of COVID‐19 on inequalities in healthcare and calls for action to prevent disparity at individual, national and supranational levels.

Background Prognostic factors and role of treatments are not well known in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type (wt) grade 2 astrocytomas. The aim of this study was to define in these tumors clinical features, molecular characteristics, and prognostic factors, with particular focus on molecular subgroups defined by cIMPACT-NOW update 3. Methods We analyzed 120 patients with confirmed diagnosis of grade 2 IDHwt astrocytoma according to WHO 2016, collected from seven Italian centers between 1999 and 2017. Results Median PFS and OS of the whole cohort were 18.9 and 32.6 months. Patients older than 40 years and patients with modest contrast enhancement on MRI had a shorter PFS and OS. Gross total resection yielded superior PFS and OS over non-gross total resection. PFS and OS of patients with either pTERT mutation or EGRF amplification were significantly shorter. The prognostic value of age, contrast enhancement on MRI, and extent of surgery was different within the molecular subgroups. Gross total resection was associated with increased PFS (not reached versus 14 months, p = 0.023) and OS (117.9 versus 20 months, p = 0.023) in patients without EGFR amplification, and with increased OS in those without pTERT mutation (NR vs 53.7 months, p = 0.05). Conversely, for patients with EGFR amplification or pTERT mutation, gross total resection did not yield a significant survival benefit. Conclusion Patients without EGFR amplification and pTERT mutation could be observed after gross total resection.

Immunization by means of vaccination is a global health success story, saving millions of lives every year. In this regard, the epidemiology of measles, rabies, polio, rubella, varicella, influenza and mumps infections, all of which can harm the nervous system, could be contained by global vaccination campaigns. In addition, toxoid vaccines against bacterial toxins such as tetanus and diphtheria are indispensable and effective interventions for toxin-mediated neurologic diseases.

BACKGROUND The diagnosis of brain metastasis involves high morbidity and mortality and remains an unmet clinical need in spite of being the most common tumor in the brain. Exclusion of these cancer patients from clinical trials is a major cause of their limited therapeutic options. MATERIAL AND METHODS We report a novel drug-screening platform (METPlatform) based on organotypic cultures which allows identifying effective anti-metastasis agents in the presence of the organ microenvironment. We have applied this approach to clinically relevant stages of brain metastasis using both experimental models and human tumor tissue (by performing patient-derived organotypic cultures - PDOCs -). We have also used METPlatform to perform unbiased proteomics of brain metastases in situ to identify potential novel mediators of this disease and explore resistance mechanisms to targeted therapy. Finally, we have exploited METPlatform as “avatars” to predict response to therapy in patients with primary brain tumors. RESULTS We identified heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) as a promising therapeutic target for brain metastasis. DEBIO-0932, a blood-brain barrier permeable HSP90 inhibitor, shows high potency against mouse and human brain metastases from different primary origin and oncogenomic profile at clinically relevant stages of the disease, including a novel model of local relapse after neurosurgery. Furthermore, in situ proteomic analysis of brain metastases treated with the chaperone inhibitor revealed non-canonical clients of HSP90 as potential novel mediators of brain metastasis and actionable mechanisms of resistance driven by autophagy. Combined therapy using HSP90 and autophagy inhibitors showed synergistic effects compared to sublethal concentrations of each monotherapy, demonstrating the potential of METPlatform to design and test rationale combination therapies to target metastasis more effectively. Finally, we show that brain tumor PDOCs predict the response of the corresponding patient to standard of care, thus proving the potential of METPlatform for improving personalized care in cancer. CONCLUSION Our work validates METPlatform as a potent resource for metastasis research integrating drug-screening and unbiased omic approaches that is fully compatible with human samples and questions the rationale of excluding patients with brain metastasis from clinical trials. We envision that METPlatform will be established as a clinically relevant strategy to personalize the management of metastatic disease in the brain and elsewhere.

BACKGROUND In the phase 2 REGOMA trial, regorafenib improved overall survival, as compared to lomustine, for glioblastoma (GBM) patients at first progression after chemoradiation. Here, we present the results of a real-life multicentre study that analysed response to treatments, tolerability, and outcome of GBM patients treated with regorafenib at first tumour progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS Regorafenib was given following an escalation dose protocol (1st cycle: 80 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 120 mg/day for one week; 2nd cycle: 120 mg/day for 2 weeks, then 160 mg/day for one week; 160 mg/day from the 3rd cycle). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as time from regorafenib initiation and disease progression or death. RESULTS From January 2020 to January 2022, 66 GBM patients were included. Median age was 60.0 years. MGMTp methylation was found in 30 patients (45.5%). Median dose was 120 mg/day 21q28 day, which was lower than that used in REGOMA trial (149 mg). Median PFS (mPFS) was 2.7 months and median OS (mOS) 7.1 months. RANO response to regorafenib was partial response (PR) in 10 (15.1%), stable disease in 14 (21.2%), and progressive disease in 42 (63.7%) patients. Forty-six (69.7%) patients presented adverse events of any grade, and 21 (31.8%) grade III-IV toxicity. Two patients only (3.0%) interrupted regorafenib due to toxicity. In a multivariable analysis, factors associated with disease progression were higher age (p = 0.035) and absence of MGMTp methylation (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION In our study, mPFS and mOS were similar to those of the 59 patients enrolled in the regorafenib arm of REGOMA trial (2.7 vs 2.0 months; 7.1 vs 7.4 months, respectively). However, we observed a higher rate of PRs (15% versus 3.0%). Moreover, we had a lower incidence of discontinuations due to toxicity, maybe because of the lower dose intensity.

International audience; Recent therapeutic advances involving the use of systemic targeted treatments and immunotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced cancers have translated into improved survival rates. Despite the emergence of such promising pharmacological therapies and extended survival, the frequency of metastases in the central nervous system has steadily increased. Effective medical and surgical therapies are available for many patients with brain metastases and need to be incorporated into multi-disciplinary care protocols. The role of neurosurgeons is evolving within these multi-disciplinary care teams. Surgical resection of brain metastases can provide immediate relief from neurological symptoms due to large lesions and provides the histopathological diagnosis in cases of no known primary malignancy. In situations where immunotherapy is part of the oncological treatment plan, surgery may be proposed for expeditious relief of edema to remove the need for steroids. In patients with multiple brain metastases and mixed response to therapeutics or radiosurgery, tumour resampling allows tissue analysis for druggable targets or to distinguish radiation effects from progression. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting may improve quality of life in patients with hydrocephalus associated with leptomeningeal tumour dissemination and may allow for time to administer more therapy thus prolonging overall survival. Addressing the limited efficacy of many oncological drugs for brain metastases due to insufficient blood-brain barrier penetrance, clinical trial protocols in which surgical specimens are analysed after pre-surgical administration of therapeutics offer pharmacodynamic insights. Comprehensive neurosurgical assessment remains an integral element of multi-disciplinary oncological care of patients with brain metastases and is integral to tumour biology research and therapeutic advancement.

The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), published in 2021, is the sixth version of the international standard for the classification of brain and spinal cord tumors. Building on the 2016 updated fourth edition and the work of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy, the 2021 fifth edition introduces major changes that advance the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification. At the same time, it remains wedded to other established approaches to tumor diagnosis such as histology and immunohistochemistry. In doing so, the fifth edition establishes some different approaches to both CNS tumor nomenclature and grading and it emphasizes the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports. New tumor types and subtypes are introduced, some based on novel diagnostic technologies such as DNA methylome profiling. The present review summarizes the major general changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification and the specific changes in each taxonomic category. It is hoped that this summary provides an overview to facilitate more in-depth exploration of the entire fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System.

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors. Yet, only few controlled clinical trials have been conducted to guide clinical decision making, resulting in variations of management approaches across countries and centers. However, recent advances in molecular genetics and clinical trial results help to refine the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to meningioma. Accordingly, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) updated its recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. A provisional diagnosis of meningioma is typically made by neuroimaging, mostly magnetic resonance imaging. Such provisional diagnoses may be made incidentally. Accordingly, a significant proportion of meningiomas, notably in patients that are asymptomatic or elderly or both, may be managed by a watch-and-scan strategy. A surgical intervention with tissue, commonly with the goal of gross total resection, is required for the definitive diagnosis according to the WHO classification. A role for molecular profiling including gene panel sequencing and genomic methylation profiling is emerging. A gross total surgical resection including the involved dura is often curative. Inoperable or recurrent tumors requiring treatment can be treated with radiosurgery, if the size or the vicinity of critical structures allows that, or with fractionated radiotherapy (RT). Treatment concepts combining surgery and radiosurgery or fractionated RT are increasingly used, although there remain controversies regard timing, type, and dosing of the various RT approaches. Radionuclide therapy targeting somatostatin receptors is an experimental approach, as are all approaches of systemic pharmacotherapy. The best albeit modest results with pharmacotherapy have been obtained with bevacizumab or multikinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, but no standard of care systemic treatment has been yet defined.

Simple Summary Leptomeningeal metastases are a devastating complication of solid tumors with poor survival, regardless of the type of treatments. The limited efficacy of targeted agents is due to the molecular divergence between leptomeningeal recurrences and primary site, as well as the presence of a heterogeneous blood-brain barrier and blood-tumor barrier that interfere with the penetration of drugs into the brain. The diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases is achieved by neurological examination, and/or brain and spinal magnetic resonance, and/or a positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology. The presence of neoplastic cells in the cerebrospinal fluid examination is the gold-standard for the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases; however, novel techniques known as “liquid biopsy” aim to improve the sensitivity and specificity in detecting circulating neoplastic cells or DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid. Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have changed the natural history of metastatic solid tumors, including lung, breast cancer, and melanoma. Targeting actionable mutations, such as epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-gene rearranged in lung cancer, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, and BRAF-mutated melanoma, have led to encouraging results also in leptomeningeal metastases. On the other hand, immunotherapy or modified traditional chemotherapy are under investigation in LM from non-druggable tumors. Abstract Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors represent an unmet need of increasing importance due to an early use of MRI for diagnosis and improvement of outcome of some molecular subgroups following targeted agents and immunotherapy. In this review, we first discussed factors limiting the efficacy of targeted agents in LM, such as the molecular divergence between primary tumors and CNS lesions and CNS barriers at the level of the normal brain, brain tumors and CSF. Further, we reviewed pathogenesis and experimental models and modalities, such as MRI (with RANO and ESO/ESMO criteria), CSF cytology and liquid biopsy, to improve diagnosis and monitoring following therapy. Efficacy and limitations of targeted therapies for LM from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged NSCLC, HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF-mutated melanomas are reported, including the use of intrathecal administration or modification of traditional cytotoxic compounds. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in LM from non-druggable tumors, in particular triple-negative breast cancer, is discussed. Last, we focused on some recent techniques to improve drug delivery.

New advances have been made in understanding the biology and treatment of diffuse gliomas, but a number of controversies regarding the management following surgery are still open. According to WHO ...

The current article reviews the state of art of prevention strategies for brain metastases from solid tumors and touches both old pivotal studies and new directions of personalized molecular approaches.Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has a definite role in the prevention of relapse into the brain for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) responding to chemotherapy and radiotherapy as it prolongs overall survival (OS). However, the risk of late cognitive deficit following whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in this patient population is still not well known. Conversely, PCI significantly reduces the incidence of brain metastases and prolongs the disease-free interval in patients with non-SCLC (NSCLC), but does not improve OS thus far. Pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups.The future challenges for prevention of brain metastases are represented by the identification of subgroups of patients at higher risk of relapse into the brain coupled with either new WBRT strategies to better preserve cognition or effective molecular agents to target micrometastases.

The optimal management of high risk WHO grade II gliomas after surgery is debated including the role of initial temozolomide to delay radiotherapy and risk of cognitive defects.A post-hoc analysis of a phase II multicenter study on high risk WHO grade II gliomas, receiving initial temozolomide alone, has re-evaluated the long-term results within the molecular subgroups of WHO 2016. The primary endpoint of the study was response according to RANO, being seizure response, PFS and OS secondary endpoints.Response rate among oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted (76%) was significantly higher than that among diffuse astrocytomas either mutant (55%) or wild-type (36%). A reduction of seizure frequency 50% was observed in 87% of patients and a seizure freedom in 72%. The probability of seizure reduction 50% was significantly associated with the presence of an IDH mutation. Median PFS, PFS at 5 and 10 years, median OS and OS at 5 and 10 years were significantly longer in oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted. Sixty-seven percent of patients with oligodendroglioma IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted did not recur with a median follow up of 9.3 years, while 59% did not receive radiotherapy at recurrence with a median follow up of 8.2 years.The beneficial effects of initial temozolomide prevail in oligodendrogliomas IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted: thus, these tumors, when incompletely resected or progressive after surgery alone, or with intractable seizures, should receive temozolomide as initial treatment with salvage radiotherapy and/o reoperation and/or second-line chemotherapy at recurrence.

Introduction: Anti-PD1 agents are widely used in the treatment of solid tumors. This has prompted the recognition of a class of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), due to the activation of autoimmune T-cells. Pembrolizumab is an anti-PD1 agent, which has been related to an increased risk of various neurological irAE (n-irAEs). Here, we present a rare case of pembrolizumab-induced neuropathy of cranial nerves.Case Report: A 72-year-old patient was diagnosed with a lung adenocarcinoma in February 2018 (EGFR–, ALK–, and PDL1 90%). According to the molecular profile, pembrolizumab was started. After three administrations, the patient developed facial paresis, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and dysphonia. As brain metastases and paraneoplastic markers were excluded, a drug-related disorder was suspected and pembrolizumab was discontinued. A nerve conduction study and electromyography excluded signs of neuropathy and myopathy at four limbs, and repetitive nerve stimulation was negative. However, altered blink reflex and nerve facial conduction were consistent with an acute neuropathy of the cranial district. Thus, the patient was treated with two cycles of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), which rapidly allowed improvement of both symptoms and neurophysiological parameters. However, the patient died in October 2018 for a progression of lung tumor.Discussion: Only 16 cases of pembrolizumab-related neuropathies have been described so far. Our case is of particular interest for the isolated involvement of cranial nerves and the prompt response to IVIg.Conclusion: N-irAEs are insidious conditions that require solid knowledge of onco-immunotherapy complications: it is mandatory not to delay any treatment that would potentially modify the course of a neurological complication.

Simple Summary Brain metastases are a commonly recognized poor prognostic factor in patients with cancer. Due to their poor prognosis, these patients were commonly excluded from the most important clinical trials that have revolutionized the oncological clinical practice. Renal cell carcinoma represents one of the most frequent neoplasia that metastasize to the brain. Due to the therapeutical advances the overall survival of brain metastatic renal cell carcinoma is improved even in the absence of tailored studies that are need to plan an adequate therapeutic strategy for these patients. Abstract Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of primary cancers that frequently metastasize to the brain. Brain metastasis derived from RCC has the propensity of intratumoral hemorrhage and relatively massive surrounding edema. Moreover, it confers a grim prognosis in a great percentage of cases with a median overall survical (mOS) around 10 months. The well-recognized prognostic factors for brain metastatic renal cell carcinoma (BMRCC) are Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), the number of brain metastasis (BM), the presence of a sarcomatoid component and the presence of extracranial metastasis. Therapeutic strategies are multimodal and include surgical resection, radiotherapy, such as stereotactic radiosurgery due to the radioresistance of RCC and systemic strategies with tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKI) or Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) whose efficacy is not well-established in this setting of patients due to their exclusion from most clinical trials. To date, in case of positive prognostic factors and after performing local radical therapies, such as complete resection of BM or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), the outcome of these patients significantly improves, up to 33 months in some patients. As a consequence, tailored clinical trials designed for BMRCC are needed to define the correct treatment strategy even in this poor prognostic subgroup of patients.

BACKGROUND Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a poor prognosis following an extensive resection, radiotherapy (RT) and concomitant/adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Once GBM progresses after SOC, lomustine is the standard second-line treatment, while rechallenge with TMZ may be employed in selected patients with methylated promoter of MGMT, and bevacizumab is reserved for patients with extensive edema and need for steroids. New treatment modalities have been investigated at first recurrence, including alternating electric fields (TTFields) or antibody direct against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as depatuximab mafodontin (ABT-414, Depatux-M), that have shown some activity in terms of disease control and progression-free survival (PFS). CLINICAL PRESENTATION In September 2018, a 38 year-old man developed reduced strength in left upper limb and daily focal seizures. MRI showed an enhancing right fronto-temporal lesion which was subtotally removed with a diagnosis of glioblastoma (IDH 1/2 wild type, MGMT methylated - 40%, EGFR amplified, EGFRvIII positive). As the patient had a poor KPS (50), in October 2018 a hypofractionated RT (DFT 40 Gy/15 fractions) with concomitant TMZ (140 mg/day) was performed, followed by adjuvant standard TMZ (340 mg/day); however, chemotherapy was stopped after 3 cycles due to local progression on MRI coupled with strength worsening, increased seizure frequency, and need for steroids. Pseudoprogression was ruled out due to tumor growth out of the field of RT. Based on the high level of methylation of the MGMT promoter and EGFR amplification, a combined treatment with metronomic TMZ (100 mg/day continuously) plus Depatux-M (1.25 mg/kg every 2 weeks) was started (February 2019), but a brain MRI performed after 3 months of treatment displayed no significant changes on both MRI and neurological status. At this time point (May 2019) TTFields treatment was added. An initial decrease of tumor size was observed on MRI after 5 months, while a reduction of tumor size more than 90% has been progressively achieved after 1 year of treatment (April 2020). Moreover, a seizure-free status was observed without changing the antiepileptic medication. The patient developed a grade 3 ocular side effect (CTCAE version 5.0) with photophobia, blurred vision, foreign body sensation in the eyes after 6 months of treatment, which improved after dose delays and dose reduction of Depatux-M. The patient is still alive, and free of progression after 30 months and 25 months from diagnosis and first recurrence, respectively. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first report of a recurrent GBM with a significant and long-lasting neuroradiological response following a combined treatment with TTFields, Depatux-M, and intensified schedule of TMZ. A synergistic effect of TTFields with compounds interfering with the microtubular system should be further investigated.