Search

Rare tumours such as penile carcinoma have been largely neglected by the urology scientific community in favour of more common — and, therefore, more easily fundable — diseases. Nevertheless, penile cancer represents a rising burden for health-care systems around the world, because a lack of widespread expertise, ineffective centralization of care and absence of research funds have hampered our ability to improve the global care of these patients. Moreover, a dichotomy has arisen in the field of penile cancer, further impeding care: the countries that are mainly supporting research on this topic through the development of epidemiological studies and design of clinical trials are not the countries that have the highest prevalence of the disease. This situation means that randomized controlled trials in developed countries often do not meet the minimum accrual and are intended to close before reaching their end points, whereas trials are almost completely absent in those areas with the highest disease prevalence and probability of successful recruitment, such as Africa, South America and South Asia. The scientific and organizational inaction that arises owing to this mismatch translates into a burdensome cost for our patients. A global effort to gather experts and pull together scientific data from around the world may be the best way to boost clinical research, to change clinical practice and, ultimately, to improve care for patients and their families., Penile cancer is a growing health-care concern worldwide. Despite its rarity, penile cancer has a disproportionate impact on some countries, as the location with the highest incidences are invariably those with low resources and few registries or trials. In this Perspective, the authors discuss how global collaboration and centralization of care can help to improve management of penile cancer worldwide, but especially in areas where resources are limited.

Objectives Lymph node invasion (LNI) is related to long-term survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, in the case of variant histology (VH), data on pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and LNI are sparse. We described the pattern of care of PLND in patients with VHs of bladder cancer, exploring predictors of LNI. Methods Using the 2001–2016 SEER registry, 20 767 bladder cancer patients who underwent PLND were identified. Included histological variants were pure urothelial carcinoma (UC), micropapillary UC, sarcomatoid UC, lymphoepithelioma-like UC, adenocarcinoma, sarcoma, giant and spindle cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and neuroendocrine tumor. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses tested for LNI predictors. Cox regression was used to test for predictors of overall mortality (OM) among both LNI positive and LNI negative patients. Results Overall, 2464 (11.9%) harbored a VH. On multivariate analysis, only micropapillary UC was associated with higher risk (OR = 3.39) of LNI. This association was maintained when only the subset of patients treated without perioperative chemotherapy were analyzed (OR = 3.30). Similarly, higher T stage (T2 stage OR = 2.24; T3–4 stage OR = 9.44) and the use of chemotherapy (OR = 2.29) were associated with a higher risk of LNI. Among patients with LNI (5299, 25.5%), SCC (HR = 1.87), T3–4 stage (HR = 1.94), age at diagnosis (HR = 1.01) and geographic region (south) (HR = 1.22) were predictors of higher risk of OM. Conversely, chemotherapy (HR = 0.69) and number of removed LN (HR = −0.99) were associated with lower risk of OM. Finally, in a subgroup of patients without LNI, sarcomatoid UC (HR = 1.58) and giant and spindle cell carcinoma (HR = 1.83) were the only VH predictors of OM. Conclusions We described different patterns of care in patients with VHs of bladder cancer. Micropapillary UC was an independent risk factor for LNI. Among patients harboring LNI, those with SCC VH had higher OM compared to pure UC. Conversely, sarcomatoid UC and giant and spindle cell carcinoma were predictors of OM in patients without nodal involvement.

Background: Extended pelvic nodal dissection (ePLND) represents the gold standard for nodal staging in prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery (RGS) could identify lymph node invasion (LNI) during robotassisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Objective: To report the planned interim analyses of a phase 2 prospective study (NCT04832958) aimed at describing PSMA-RGS during RARP.Design, setting, and participants: A phase 2 trial aimed at enrolling 100 patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0cM0 PCa at conventional imaging with a risk of LNI of >5% was conducted. Overall, 18 patients were enrolled between June 2021 and March 2022. Among them, 12 patients underwent PSMA-RGS and represented the study cohort.Surgical procedure: All patients received Ga-68-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging; Tc-99m-PSMA-I&S was synthesised and administered intravenously the day before surgery, followed by single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. A Drop-In gamma probe was used for in vivo measurements. All positive lesions (count rate >= 2 compared with background) were excised and ePLND was performed.Measurements: Side effects, perioperative outcomes, and performance characteristics of robot-assisted PSMA-RGS for LNI were measured.Results and limitations: Overall, four (33%), six (50%), and two (17%) patients had intermediate-risk, high-risk, and locally advanced PCa. Overall, two (17%) patients had pathologic nodal uptake at PSMA PET. The median operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were 230 min, 100 ml, and 5 d, respectively. No adverse events and intraoperative complications were recorded. One patient experienced a 30-d complication (ClavienDindo 2; 8.3%). Overall, three (25%) patients had LNI at ePLND. At per-region analyses on 96 nodal areas, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PSMA-RGS were 63%, 99%, 83%, and 96%, respectively. On a per-patient level, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of PSMA-RGS were 67%, 100%, 100%, and 90%, respectively.Conclusions: Robot-assisted PSMA-RGS in primary staging is a safe and feasible procedure characterised by acceptable specificity but suboptimal sensitivity, missing micrometastatic nodal disease.Patient summary: Prostate-specific membrane antigen radioguided robot-assisted surgery is a safe and feasible procedure for the intraoperative identification of nodal metastases in cN0cM0 prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. However, this approach might still miss micrometastatic nodal dissemination. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Our aim was to evaluate whether transperineal (TP) MRI-targeted prostate biopsy (TBx) may improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), defined as International Society of Urological Pathology ≥2, in comparison to transrectal (TR) TBx.A multicenter retrospective cohort study comprising patients who underwent MRI-guided prostate biopsy was conducted. To address possible benefits of TP-TBx in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and csPCa, a cohort of patients undergoing TP-TBx were compared to patients undergoing TR-TBx. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of PCa and csPCa detection.Overall, 1,936 and 3,305 patients who underwent TR-TBx vs TP-TBx at 10 referral centers were enrolled. The rate of PCa and csPCa diagnosed was higher for TP-TBx vs TR-TBx (64.0% vs 50%, p0.01 and 49% vs 35%, p0.01). At multivariable analysis adjusted for age, biopsy naïve/repeated biopsy, cT stage, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System®, prostate volume, PSA, and number of biopsy cores targeted, TP-TBx was an independent predictor of PCa (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.72) and csPCa (1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.50). When considering the approach according to the site of the index lesion, TP-TBx had a significantly higher likelihood than TR-TBx to detect csPCa in the apex (OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.03-6.27), transition/central zone (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.42-5.00), and anterior zone (OR 5.62, 95% CI 1.74-8.13).The use of TP-TBx allows a better cancer grade definition and PCa risk assessment. This has important implication in the decision-making process and in patient counseling for further therapies.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Although MRI targeted biopsies (TBx) have been demonstrated to provide high accuracy in detecting clinically signicant prostate cancer (PCa), the addition of systematic b...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Existing evidence supporting a specific number of targeted biopsy (TBx) cores in case of a positive multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate is...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Race/ethnicity may predispose to less favorable prostate cancer characteristics in intermediate risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) patients. We tested this hypothesis in a sub...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Although multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is commonly used in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer (PCa), its implications for patient selection...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Although PCa misclassification and progression during active surveillance (AS) have been well defined for men with low risk Prostate Cancer (PCa), the definition of adver...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) might be an option in oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, no preoperative risk tool is available to select candidate...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) has demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for clinically signicant PCa (csPCa). However, there is still a substantial variability in mp-MRI p...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Recent evidence demonstrated the pivotal role of mpMRI in patient selection for active surveillance protocol (AS). However, the positive predictive value (PPV) of mpMRI i...

Context Worldwide, prostate cancer (PCa) represents the second most common solid tumor in men. Objective To assess the geographical distribution of PCa, epidemiological differences, and the most relevant risk factors for the disease. Evidence acquisition Estimated incidence, mortality, and prevalence of PCa for the year 2020 in 185 countries were derived from the IARC GLOBOCAN database. A review of English-language articles published between 2010 and 2020 was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify risk factors for PCa. Evidence synthesis In the year 2020, there were over 1 414 000 estimated new cases of PCa worldwide, with an age-standardized rate (ASR) incidence of 31 per 100 000 (lifetime cumulative risk: 3.9%). Northern Europe has the highest all-age incidence ASR (83), while the lowest ASR was in South-Central Asia (6.3). In the year 2020, there were over 375 000 estimated deaths worldwide, and the overall mortality ASR was 7.7 per 100 000, with the highest ASR in the Caribbean (28) and the lowest in South-Central Asia (3.1). Family history, hereditary syndromes, and race are the strongest risk factors for PCa. Metabolic syndrome was associated with the risk of developing PCa, high-grade disease, and adverse pathology. Diabetes and exposure to ultraviolet rays were found to be inversely associated to PCa incidence. Cigarette smoking and obesity may increase PCa-specific mortality, while regular physical activity may reduce disease progression. Although 5-alpha reductase inhibitors are known to be associated with a reduced incidence of PCa, available studies failed to show an effect on overall mortality. Conclusions Family history, race, and hereditary syndromes are well-established risk factors for PCa. Modifiable risk factors may impact the risk of developing PCa and that of dying from the disease, but little evidence exist for any clear indication for prevention other than early diagnosis to reduce PCa mortality. Patient summary Prostate cancer (PCa) rates vary profoundly worldwide, with incidence and mortality rates being highest in Northern Europe and Caribbean, respectively. South-Central Asia has the lowest epidemiological burden. Family history, race, and hereditary syndromes are well-established risk factors for PCa. Modifiable risk factors may impact the risk of developing PCa and that of dying from the disease itself, but little evidence exist for any clear indication for prevention other than early diagnosis to reduce PCa mortality.

Background: Although an increasing number of prostate cancer (PCa) patients received holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) previously for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), there is still no evidence regarding the outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in this setting. Objective: To assess functional and oncological results of RP in PCa patients who received HoLEP for BPO previously in a contemporary multi-institutional cohort. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 95 patients who underwent RP between 2011 and 2019 and had a history of HoLEP were identified in two institutions. Functional as well as oncological follow-up was prospectively assessed and retrospectively analyzed. Intervention: RP following HoLEP compared with RP without previous transurethral surgery. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Patients with complete follow-up data were matched with individuals with no history of BPO surgery using propensity score matching. Complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo scale. Results and limitations: The median follow-up was 50.5 mo. We found no significant impact of previous HoLEP on positive surgical margin rate (14.0% [HoLEP] vs 18.8% [no HoLEP], p = 0.06) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–1.70, p = 0.4). Patients with a history of HoLEP had increased 1-yr urinary incontinence rates after RP. After adjusting for confounders, no significant impact of previous HoLEP was found (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.74–1.01; p = 0.07). Previous HoLEP did not hamper 1-yr erectile function recovery (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.43; p = 0.01). Limitations include retrospective design and small sample size. Conclusions: RP after previous HoLEP is surgically feasible, with low complication rates and no negative impact on biochemical recurrence–free survival. However, in a multivariable analysis, we observed significantly worse 1-yr continence rates in patients after previous HoLEP. Patient summary: In the current study, we assessed the oncological and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy in patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) previously due to prostatic bladder outlet obstruction. A history of HoLEP did not hamper oncological results, 1-yr continence, and erectile function recovery. We provide data from a propensity score–matched population of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with or without previous holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). In multivariable analyses, no differences were found in biochemical recurrence–free survival, positive surgical margin rates, and 1-yr continence recovery. Patients with previous HoLEP had similar rates of bilateral nerve sparing and increased 1-yrerectile function recovery compared with those without previous HoLEP.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging is characterized by superior accuracy compared to conventional imaging for identification of nodal and distant metastases in prostate cancer. The majority of international clinical guidelines recommend PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography for patients experiencing biochemical recurrence, even at low prostate-specific antigen values, to identify candidates for salvage therapies. However, its use in for primary staging is still not recommended.