Search

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and economic benefits of three synchrony programs in 1137 heifers from 10 pasture-based dairy herds. Heifers were randomly assigned to one of three treatments within each herd on Day -13 (Day 0 = start of the breeding program). They were treated with: (1) PGF(2α) on Days -13 and -2, with AI after detection of estrus between Days 0 and 3 (Double PG); (2) GnRH, PGF(2α), and GnRH on Days -9, -2, and 0, respectively, with placement of an intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing device between Days -9 and -2, and set time AI on Day 1 (GPG + P4); or (3) same as the GPG + P4 group but with the set time AI on Day 0 (Cosynch + P4). Plasma P4 concentrations were determined on Days -20 and -13 to determine pubertal status. The Cosynch + P4 treatment had a higher (P < 0.05) conception rate to AI (57% vs. 47% vs. 48% for Cosynch + P4, GPG + P4, and Double PG, respectively), 21-day in-calf rate (76% vs. 72% vs. 63% for Cosynch + P4, GPG + P4, and Double PG), and a shorter median interval from the start of the breeding program to conception (0, 14, and 19 days for Cosynch + P4, GPG + P4, and Double PG). Heifers that had reached puberty before breeding, compared with those that had not, had higher (P < 0.05) in-calf rates to AI (53% vs. 47%) at 21 days (74% vs. 64%) and at 42 days (91% vs. 84%). Pubertal status was associated with herd, breed, age, and body condition score at the start of mating (P < 0.05). A partial budget model demonstrated that, compared with the Double PG program, there was an economic benefit from the Cosynch + P4 (mean, NZ$25.73; 95% confidence interval, 2.99-50.69), but not the GPG + P4 program (mean, NZ$-0.65; 95% confidence interval, -21.87 to 21.58). We concluded that the Cosynch + P4 program resulted in the highest fertility and economic benefit of the three programs evaluated, and that reproductive response was affected by pubertal status., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Management, nutrition, production, and genetics are the main reasons for the decline in fertility in the modern dairy cow. Selection for the single trait of milk production with little consideration for traits associated with reproduction in the modern dairy cow has produced an antagonistic relationship between milk yield and reproductive performance. The outcome is a multi-factorial syndrome of subfertility during lactation; thus, to achieve a better understanding and derive a solution, it is necessary to integrate a range of disciplines, including genetics, nutrition, immunology, molecular biology, endocrinology, metabolic and reproductive physiology, and animal welfare. The common theme underlying the process is a link between nutritional and metabolic inputs that support complex interactions between the gonadotropic and somatotropic axes. Multiple hormonal and metabolic signals from the liver, pancreas, muscle, and adipose tissues act on brain centers regulating feed intake, energy balance, and metabolism. Among these signals, glucose, fatty acids, insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin, growth hormone, ghrelin, leptin, and perhaps myostatin appear to play key roles. Many of these factors are affected by changes in the somatotropic axis that are a consequence of, or are needed to support, high milk production. Ovarian tissues also respond directly to metabolic inputs, with consequences for folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis, and the development of the oocyte and embryo. Little doubt exists that appropriate nutritional management before and after calving is essential for successful reproduction. Changes in body composition are related to the processes that lead to ovulation, estrus, and conception. However, better indicators of body composition and measures of critical metabolites are required to form precise nutritional management guidelines to optimize reproductive outcomes. The eventual solution to the reduction in fertility will be a new strategic direction for genetic selection that includes fertility-related traits. However, this will take time to be effective, so, in the short term, we need to gain a greater understanding of the interactions between nutrition and fertility to better manage the issue. A greater understanding of the phenomenon will also provide markers for more targeted genetic selection. This review highlights many fruitful directions for research, aimed at the development of strategies for nutritional management of reproduction in the high-producing subfertile dairy cow.

The effect of increased access to pasture feeding during the last 6 wk of gestation on metabolic responses and postpartum anestrous interval was investigated. Heifers with a body condition score (BCS) of 5.0 (BC5+FF; on a 1-to-10 scale, US = 1.5 + 0.32 x New Zealand) were offered unrestricted pasture, and those with BCS 4.0 were fed either pasture unrestricted (BC4+FF) or restricted (BC4+RES) for the last 6 wk of gestation. After calving, all groups were offered unrestricted pasture. Mean BCS at calving for BC5+FF, BC4+FF, and BC4+RES were 4.7 +/- 0.1, 4.3 +/- 0.1, and 3.5 +/- 0.1, respectively. At 35 d postpartum, LH pulse frequency was lower in BC4+RES than in BC4+FF and BC5+FF, which were similar. At 77 d after calving, 8% of BC4+RES cows had ovulated compared with 75% of BC4+FF and 69% of BC5+FF cows. Metabolic hormonal differences between BC4+FF and BC4+RES were not reflected in the differences between BC4+FF and BC5+FF for LH pulse frequency or ovulation. Unrestricted access to pasture during the final 6 wk of gestation for BC4 heifers reduced the risk of prolonged postpartum anestrus. Systemic factors, tissue sensitivity, and critical developmental set points are probably involved in the integrated control of ovulation by body condition.

Nutrient balance affects the resumption of ovarian cyclic activity following calving in dairy cattle. However, few data are available about the relationships between nutrient balance and expression of oestrus or conception. It was hypothesised that previously anoestrous cows that conceived to first insemination and cows that expressed oestrus at the subsequent expected return to oestrus would be less likely to be in negative energy balance (i.e. would have higher body condition score, higher glucose, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), leptin or insulin concentrations, and lower non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), beta hydroxy butyrate (BOH) concentrations 12-15 days after insemination) than herd mates not conceiving or expressing oestrus. Anoestrous cows were treated with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate (Day 0 = end of treatment period) and retrospectively categorised as conceiving (n = 108) or not conceiving (n = 108) to insemination. A subset of cows not conceiving to insemination were categorised as expressing (n = 44) or not expressing (n = 44) oestrus between Days 14 and 28 after initial insemination. Cows conceiving had a lower NEFA concentration (P = 0.014) than non-conceiving cows. Cows subsequently detected in oestrus had higher body condition scores (P = 0.016), IGF concentrations (P = 0.008) and milk protein percentages (P = 0.038), and lower BOH concentrations (P = 0.018) than cows not expressing oestrus. No difference in concentrations of leptin, insulin, glucose, blood urea nitrogen or milk yield were found between cows conceiving or not conceiving and those detected in oestrus or not detected in oestrus (P > 0.1). It is concluded that some measures of metabolic status at the time of pregnancy recognition affects the probability of pregnancy and of subsequent expression of oestrus in those treated, anoestrous cows not conceiving.

Cows with an extended interval from calving to first ovulation (PPI) have increased intervals from calving to conception and are more likely to be culled compared with cows with a short PPI. In year-round calving dairy herds, between 11 and 38% of cows are reported as anestrus by 50 or 60 d after calving. In seasonally calving dairy herds, between 13 and 48% of cows are diagnosed as anovulatory anestrus at the start of the breeding period. Ovulation and estrus after calving are delayed when the positive feedback effects of estradiol on release of LH from the pituitary, and circulating concentrations of metabolic hormones such as insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I, are reduced by a variety of environmental factors. The main factors are limited energy intake, lower body reserves, increased partitioning of energy to milk production, suckling, and peripartum disease. Treatment options for cows with an extended PPI include hormonal and management strategies. Hormonal treatments that include a period of progesterone supplementation result in the majority of treated animals displaying estrus with a subsequent luteal phase of normal duration and improved pregnancy rates compared with untreated controls. Hormonal interventions also tend to have more predictable outcomes compared with management changes, such as manipulating body condition or dietary intakes after calving, and usually have some estrous synchronization effect, thus facilitating the use of artificial insemination. However, responses to any treatment are variable and are related to those factors that influence duration of the PPI, such as body condition and parity.

This study tested the hypothesis that the decline in pulsatile release of luteinizing hormone (LH), resulting from steroid negative feedback, is greater in animals fed a low, compared with a high, plane of nutrition. Two-year-old cows were ovariectomized and six days later were fed diets to provide 1.5 x maintenance requirements (n = 6, supplemented) or 0.5 x maintenance requirements (n = 6, restricted) (Round 1). Pulsatile release of LH was measured over a 14-h period on the fifth day of feeding these diets (Day 1); at 6 h, all animals were treated with an intravaginal insert containing 1.38 g progesterone, which remained in place until the end of Day 3. Pulsatile release of LH was again measured for 14 h on Day 3; at 6 h, all animals were injected intramuscularly with oestradiol benzoate (ODB; 1 mg per 500 kg live weight). Three days later, this protocol was repeated, in a cross-over design, with cows that were previously restricted now being supplemented and those cows previously supplemented, now restricted (Round 2). Plasma concentrations of progesterone after intravaginal progesterone treatment were 1.01 ng mL(-1) higher in restricted cows compared with supplemented cows (P < 0.001) and were also higher in Round 1 than in Round 2 and on Day 1 than on Day 3 (P < 0.001). Plasma concentrations of oestradiol following injection with ODB did not differ between supplemented and restricted cows (P > 0.1). Dietary intake did not affect mean concentrations of LH, pulse frequency or amplitude during the 6-h period before steroid treatment or the change in these variables following steroid treatment; however, the slope of the decline in concentrations of LH following progesterone treatment was significantly more negative in cows fed restricted diets compared with those fed supplemented diets. In Round 2, mean concentrations of LH were higher preceding, and decreased more following, progesterone treatment compared with the decrease after ODB treatment. In conclusion, acute dietary restriction resulted in a more rapid decline in the release of LH following treatment with intravaginal progesterone, and was associated with higher concentrations of progesterone in plasma.

Two experiments were carried out to determine the effect of a low dose of progesterone (P) with and without the addition of an injection of oestradiol benzoate (ODB) on ovarian follicle dynamics, oestradiol production and LH pulsatility in postpartum anoestrous cows, compared with cows which had resumed oestrous cycles (cycling cows). In the first experiment, anoestrous Jersey cows were treated with (AN+P, n=8) or without (AN-3, n=3) a previously used intravaginal progesterone releasing (CIDR) device for 10 days, commencing 3 or 4 days after emergence of a new dominant follicle (DF1) as determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Contemporary cycling cows (CYC+P, n=8) were similarly treated with used CIDR devices and injected with prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF) at the time of device insertion. Follicle turnover was monitored by daily ultrasonography and pulsatile release of LH was measured on the ninth day after device insertion. During the period of CIDR device insertion, a second dominant follicle emerged in 4/8 of the CYC+P group and 7/8 of the AN+P group (P=0.14). Maximum diameter of DF1 was greater in cows in the CYC+P compared with the AN+P group (P=0.02), but did not differ between cows in the AN+P and AN-P groups (P>0.1). Frequency of LH pulses was greater in cows in the CYC+P than AN+P group (P=0.06), and in cows in the AN+P than AN-P group (P=0.02). In the second experiment, anoestrous (n=20) and cycling (n=11) Friesian cows were treated with a new CIDR device for 6 days commencing 3 days after emergence of a new dominant follicle (DF1). Cycling cows were also injected with PGF on the day of device insertion. Half of the cows in each group were injected with 2mg ODB on the day of device insertion. Daily ultrasonography was used to monitor follicular dynamics throughout the experimental period. Follicular turnover was increased by ODB in cycling (5/5 versus 1/6; P<0.05), but not anoestrous cows (5/9 versus 4/11). Persistence of DF1 was reduced by ODB treatment in both cycling and anoestrous cows (P<0.001). Maximum diameter of DF1 was influenced by ODB treatment and reproductive status (P<0.05). In anoestrous cows in which a second dominant follicle did not emerge during the period of device insertion, the interval from emergence of DF1 to emergence of a second dominant follicle was significantly delayed by treatment with ODB (P=0.04). In conclusion, P treatment of anoestrous cows increased pulsatile release of LH, but did not induce the development of persistent follicles. Injection of ODB in association with P treatment reduced the persistence of dominant follicles in both cycling and anoestrous cows, but delayed subsequent follicular development in a proportion of anoestrous cows.

Aim: To compare 2 treatments for anovulatory anoestrus (AA) in postpartum dairy cows. The treatments were combinations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and prostaglandin F2 (PG) or progesterone (P4) and oestradiol benzoate (ODB)., Methods: Forty AA cows from each of 5 herds were blocked by age (2 or 2 years old) and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments. The first group (GPG) were treated with 250 mug of a GnRH analogue, gonadorelin, followed 7 days later by 15 mg of the PG analogue, luprostiol. Two days later the cows were injected with 250 mug of gonadorelin. Cows were artificially inseminated 16-24 h after the second GnRH injection. The second group (P4+ODB) were treated with an intravaginal P4 releasing device for 6 days, followed 24 h after device removal by injection of 1 mg of ODB. Cows were pregnancy tested 35-40 days after the initial insemination and twice again at 6-8 week intervals thereafter., Results: There was no significant difference between P4+ODB and GPG groups in the percentage of cows submitted for insemination in the first 7 days (94.0% vs 100% for P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.3), in conception rate to first insemination within the first 7 days (43.6% vs 35.0% for P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.2), in the percentage of cows conceiving in the first 28 days of the breeding period (68.0% vs 58.3%, P4+ODB vs GPG, respectively; p>0.1), or in median interval from the end of treatment to conception (20 vs 21 days; p>0.1)., Conclusions: No differences in the reproductive performance of AA cows treated with either P4+ODB or GPG were detected. However, given the small number of animals enrolled, further data are required before the GPG protocol can be recommended for treatment of AA cows.

A dynamic model to describe ovarian follicular development following commitment has been developed. It identifies follicular growth with oestradiol production and assumes that this growth is the result of intra-ovarian stimulation, gonadotrophin stimulation, and inhibitory interactions among the follicles, where larger follicles suppress the growth of the smaller follicles. The variables of the model are the levels of oestradiol in each follicle at commitment, the rate of change of oestradiol production by individual follicles during follicular development, and the level of oestradiol that will induce luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. Changes in the variables of the model could be associated with both genetic and environmental effects. The behaviour of the model is consistent with experimental observations. The model can be expanded to include exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) administration assuming that FSH is associated with advancing the maturation of gonadotrophin-dependent follicles without affecting the number of committed follicles. The use of the model to explore FSH administration strategies is demonstrated. The model confirms that the response to FSH administration depends on both the amount of FSH and the time of administration. The largest number of double ovulations occurred when FSH was given at the time of the deviation of the dominant and subordinate follicles.

The objective was to characterise the distribution of dominant ovarian follicles in the early post-partum period in relation to the side of the preceding pregnancy and its relationship with the left and right ovaries. Primiparous cows were enrolled over a 2-year period (n = 33 in Year 1 and n = 28 in Year 2). Ovarian follicles were observed daily by trans-rectal ultrasonography commencing within 9 days of calving. Dominant follicles (DF) were described as occurring on the ovary ipsilateral to the CL of preceding pregnancy (ipsilateral ovary of pregnancy, IOP) or contralateral to the CL of the preceding pregnancy (contralateral ovary of pregnancy, COP), and as occurring on the left or right ovary. Results in Year 1 were analysed for the effect of breed (Friesian n = 15; Jersey n = 18). There was a bias towards the COP for the first DF post-partum in both breeds (DF1; 70%; p<0.05). A breed interaction was observed with the second DF post-partum with a bias towards the COP in the Friesian (93%; p<0.05); but not the Jersey animals (50%). In Year 2, all cows were Friesians, and there was again a biased distribution of the DF1 towards the COP (89%; p<0.05) and for the combined distribution of the first three DF post-partum (76%; p<0.05) as well as the first ovulatory follicle (71%; p<0.05). A comparison of the pooled data for the location of the DF1 from both years showed that only one DF1 was observed on a left ovary in the 29 cases where the preceding pregnancy was also on the left side. This study demonstrated a bias in the distribution of DL in the early post-partum period towards the ovary on the side opposite that of the preceding pregnancy as well as towards the right side.

Aim: To determine whether mating previously anoestrous cows on their second, rather than first, oestrus post pm-turn could increase conception rates to that service., Methods: Cows diagnosed as anovulatory anoestrus were allocated to two groups, starting treatment on Day -17 (OES2) or on Day -7 (OESI) where the date of the planned start of mating = Day 0. All cows were treated with intravaginal progesterone (CIDR device) for 6 days and an injection of 1 mg oestradiol benzoate 24 h after removal of the device. Cows in the OES2 group were also injected with prostaglandin F2alpha on Day 0., Results: During the first 7 days of mating, 61.8% (207/335) and 88.2% (328/372) of cows in the OES2 and OESl groups, respectively, were inseminated on detection of oestrus (p <0.001). Oestrus without ovulation occurred in 1.5% of cows in the OES2 group and 6.2% of cows in the OESl group during this period (p <0.01). Of those cows inseminated in the first week of mating, conception rates were 54.0% in the OES2 group and 45.5% in the OESl group (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in median interval from start of mating to conception between the two groups (24 and 22 days for OES2 and OESl, respectively, p >0.05)., Conclusion: Mating previously anoestrous cows on their second, rather than first oestrus post partum increased conception rates to that service. However, median intervals from start of mating to conception were not altered.

Aims: To determine the level of agreement between transrectal ultrasonography, manual palpation and measurement of progesterone in the detection of corpora lutea in post-partum cows. To evaluate the reproductive performance of cows not detected in oestrus prior to mating, but detected with a corpus luteum at the start of mating., Methods: Cows from seven herds which were not detected in oestrus were examined between 5 and 7 days before the herd's planned start of mating. Ovaries were examined by palpation and ultrasonography in 160 cows and plasma progesterone concentrations were also measured in 103 cows. Insemination dates and pregnancy data were recorded in 159 cows not detected in oestrus but having a corpus luteum and 1405 cycling herd mates., Results: The level of agreement between ultrasonography and measurement of progesterone (kappa = 0.74) was higher than with manual palpation (kappa = 0.67) although it was significant for both techniques (p <0.001). Cows which were not detected in oestrus, but detected with a corpus luteum had a longer interval to first service (12 v. 10 days, p <0.05) and conception (19 v. 15 days, p = 0.01) than cycling herd mates and had a higher empty rate (9.7% v. 3.8%, p <0.001)., Conclusions: These data indicate that ultrasonography may provide a better diagnostic tool for examining cows not detected in oestrus than manual palpation or measurement of progesterone concentration. Cows not detected in oestrus but having a corpus luteum were shown to have significantly poorer reproductive performance than cycling herd mates.

The aim of this study was to monitor endocrine and ovarian changes immediately preceding the onset of nutritionally induced anestrus. Daily blood samples were obtained from 14 postpubertal heifers for one estrous cycle (initial estrous cycle). Subsequently, heifers designated "restricted" were given a limited diet (n = 9), and daily blood samples were obtained for approximately 21 days preceding onset of anestrus (anovulatory cycle). Controls were allowed ad libitum dietary intake (n = 5), and daily blood samples were collected for a complete estrous cycle during a time period that coincided with that preceding onset of anestrus in restricted heifers. Plasma samples were assayed for LH, FSH, progesterone, and estradiol-17 beta. The ovaries of all heifers were examined daily using transrectal ultrasonography from the initial until the final or anovulatory estrous cycles to determine changes in growth of follicles and corpora lutea. Anestrus was defined as failure of ovulation of the dominant follicle following luteolysis. When anovulatory and initial estrous cycles in restricted heifers were compared, mean concentrations of LH were lower (p < 0.01), and diameters of dominant follicles were smaller (p < 0.01); mean concentrations of estradiol-17 beta were also lower in the three days following luteolysis (p = 0.06), but concentrations of FSH appeared to be higher (p = 0.003); maximum diameters of corpora lutea were smaller (p < 0.001), but duration of luteal phases and concentrations of progesterone preceding luteolysis were similar (p > 0.10). In controls, no differences were found between estrous cycles for any of these variables. It is concluded that failure of ovulation, following reduced dietary intake, resulted from insufficient circulating LH to stimulate maturation of the ovulatory follicle.

Changes in pulsatile secretion of LH, FSH, oestradiol and progesterone were related to the growth phase, early plateau phase and regression phase of the first ovarian dominant follicle of the oestrous cycle in Bos indicus heifers. Relationships between these hormones during the three phases were also investigated. Accurate measurements of episodic ovarian steroid secretion were obtained by catheterizing the caudal vena cava via the lateral saphenous vein; the tip of the catheter was positioned just cranial to the ovarian vein using transrectal ultrasonography. Pulsatile secretion of oestradiol was increased only during the growth phase of the dominant follicle and was associated with high frequency release of LH pulses. However, mean concentrations of oestradiol were reduced when the dominant follicle attained its maximum diameter. Between the growth and plateau phases, as the amount of progesterone released increased and oestradiol released decreased, LH pulse frequency and mean concentration of LH decreased. Pulses of LH released were followed within 15 min by increases in mean concentrations of oestradiol (P < 0.001); however, there was no apparent relationship between LH and progesterone release (P = 0.19). Although there was little evidence of pulsatile release of FSH, mean concentrations of FSH were increased by 0.2 ng ml-1 (P = 0.04) during the plateau phase, which was on average 2.1 days before the day of emergence of the second dominant follicle of the oestrous cycle. This increase in FSH, in conjunction with the decrease in secretion of oestradiol, may be an indication of the loss of functional dominance by the first dominant follicle of the oestrous cycle.

This study examined the effects of live mass on ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers before and after the onset of nutritional anoestrus. The effects of decreased live mass on secretion of progesterone, LH and FSH were also investigated. Ovarian characteristics were monitored in 16 postpubertal Brahman heifers using daily transrectal ultrasonography. After two normal oestrous cycles, 11 heifers (treatment group) were allocated to a restricted diet, until the cessation of their oestrous cycles, that resulted in a decrease in live mass of 0.8 kg day-1. Heifers were then fed an ad libitum diet, resulting in increasing live mass until resumption of oestrous cycles. Five heifers (control group) were fed an unrestricted diet throughout the experimental period. The concentrations of progesterone in plasma were monitored twice a week and the concentrations of LH and FSH were determined on day 6 after ovulation, before initiation of dietary restriction, after a 17% decrease in live mass and after the onset of anoestrus in the treatment group. Onset of anoestrus was preceded by linear decreases in the size of ovarian follicles and corpora lutea, and in the persistence of the first dominant follicles of oestrous cycles. These changes were proportional to the decrease in live mass (P < 0.001). The frequency of pulses of LH or mean concentration of FSH on day 6 of the oestrous cycle were not changed after a 17% decrease in live mass, and did not increase following the onset of anoestrus, although concentrations of progesterone were < 0.2 ng ml-1, suggesting that release of LH was suppressed at this time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)