Search

Your search keyword '"Reza Mousavi, Mohammad"' showing total 8 results
Start Over Author "Reza Mousavi, Mohammad"
8 results on '"Reza Mousavi, Mohammad"'

1. On Specifying for Trustworthiness

Author

B. Abeywickrama, Dhaminda, Bennaceur, Amel, Chance, Greg, Yiannis Demiris, Yiannis, Kordoni, Anastasia, Levine, Mark, Moffat, Luke, Moreau, Luc, Reza Mousavi, Mohammad, Nuseibeh, Bashar, Ramamoorthy, Subramanian, Ringert, Jan Oliver, Wilson, James, Windsor, Shane, Eder, Kerstin, B. Abeywickrama, Dhaminda, Bennaceur, Amel, Chance, Greg, Yiannis Demiris, Yiannis, Kordoni, Anastasia, Levine, Mark, Moffat, Luke, Moreau, Luc, Reza Mousavi, Mohammad, Nuseibeh, Bashar, Ramamoorthy, Subramanian, Ringert, Jan Oliver, Wilson, James, Windsor, Shane, and Eder, Kerstin

Abstract

As autonomous systems increasingly become part of our lives, it is crucial to foster trust between humans and these systems, to ensure positive outcomes and mitigate harmful ones.

Published
2024

2. Interpreted Systems Semantics for Process Algebra with Identity Annotations

Author

Dechesne, Francien, Reza Mousavi, Mohammad, Hutchison, David, editor, Kanade, Takeo, editor, Kittler, Josef, editor, Kleinberg, Jon M., editor, Mattern, Friedemann, editor, Mitchell, John C., editor, Naor, Moni, editor, Nierstrasz, Oscar, editor, Pandu Rangan, C., editor, Steffen, Bernhard, editor, Sudan, Madhu, editor, Terzopoulos, Demetri, editor, Tygar, Doug, editor, Vardi, Moshe Y., editor, Weikum, Gerhard, editor, Bezhanishvili, Guram, editor, Löbner, Sebastian, editor, Marra, Vincenzo, editor, and Richter, Frank, editor

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Connected Tech: Smart or Sinister?: A Call for Evidence from the Department of Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport

Author

Townsend, Beverley, Hyde, Richard, Lindley, Joseph, Stead, Michael, Coulton, Paul, Lisinska, Justyna, Moffat, Luke, Reza Mousavi, Mohammad, Ramchurn, Gopal, Shukla, Paurav, Williams, Jennifer, Townsend, Beverley, Hyde, Richard, Lindley, Joseph, Stead, Michael, Coulton, Paul, Lisinska, Justyna, Moffat, Luke, Reza Mousavi, Mohammad, Ramchurn, Gopal, Shukla, Paurav, and Williams, Jennifer

Abstract

Impact of increasingly prevalent smart technologies We think that these changes will result in better or worse futures will be determined in large part by what is prioritised in technological innovation, and to what extent (if at all), previously marginalised, silenced, and exploited voices become part of the conversation. Our major concern is that innovation for profit is incentivised over societal benefits. We recommend that the government incentivises innovation for societal benefit. Impact of smart technologies on different groups Increased risks, especially for the most vulnerable and marginalised in society Smart technologies can improve the lives of vulnerable people but at the same time pose more significant risks if not appropriately managed. Therefore, we advocate for more inclusive development of smart devices at every stage of the product lifecycle (e.g. design, testing, implementation and maintenance). For example, datasets used for training, testing, and validating smart technologies are developed for common use cases; taking into account underprivileged and diverse parts of the society is key to their successful and fair adoption. While some technological solutions can be developed especially for vulnerable groups, a recent example with eye implants showed there is no protection once a company decides to end its production. We also advocate for more research with diverse groups. Smart technologies are mainly developed for commercial purposes, meaning that they do not consider different people’s needs and appetite for adoption. Digital literacies and skills The government needs to take responsibility for equipping society with the skills needed to use smart technologies in a safe and efficient way (eg to manage their privacy settings or set up secure passwords). Essential Digital Skills Report 2021 showed that c.10 million (19%) of UK adults do not have fundamental digital skills (for example, be able to use a device, connect to a Wi-Fi network and cre

Published
2022

6. Preface: Special issue on Trends in Concurrency Theory (selected invited contributions from the workshops TRENDS 2014 and 2015)

Author

Castellani, Ilaria, Reza Mousavi, Mohammad, Secure Diffuse Programming (INDES), Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée (CRISAM), Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria), Center for Research on Embedded Systems, and Halmstad University

Subjects
[INFO.INFO-IU]Computer Science [cs]/Ubiquitous Computing, ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Abstract

International audience

Published
2017

7. Mid-Term Follow-Up of Drug-Eluting Stenting for In-Stent Restenosis: Bare-Metal Stents versus Drug-Eluting Stents.

Author

Faramarzi, Negar, Salarifar, Mojtaba, Ebrahim Kassaian, Seyed, Haji Zeinali, Ali Mohammad, Alidoosti, Mohammad, Pourhoseini, Hamidreza, Nematipour, Ebrahim, Reza Mousavi, Mohammad, and Goodarzynejad, Hamidreza

Subjects
ANGIOPLASTY, CHI-squared test, FISHER exact test, LONGITUDINAL method, HEALTH outcome assessment, RESEARCH funding, SURGICAL stents, SURGICAL complications, T-test (Statistics), VASCULAR grafts, CORONARY restenosis, TREATMENT effectiveness, RETROSPECTIVE studies, DRUG-eluting stents
Abstract

Background: Despite major advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a therapeutic challenge. We sought to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes after treatment with repeat drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation ("DES sandwich " technique) with DES placement in the bare-metal stent (DES-in-BMS) in a "real world" setting. Methods: We retrospectively identified and analyzed clinical and angiographic data on 194 patients previously treated with the DES who underwent repeat PCI for ISR with a DES or a BMS. ISR was defined, by visual assessment, as a luminal stenosis greater than 50% within the stent or within 5 mm of its edges. We recorded the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: Of the 194 study participants, 130 were men (6 7.0%) and the mean ± SD of age was 57.0 ± 10.4 years, ranging from 37 to 80 years. In-hospital events (death and Q-wave myocardial infarction) occurred at a similar frequency in both groups. Outcomes at twelve months were also similar between the groups with cumulative clinical MACE at one-year follow-up of 9.6% and 11.3% in the DES-in-BMS and the DES-in-DES groups, respectively (p value = 0.702). Although not significant, there was a trend toward a higher TVR rate in the intra-DES ISR group as compared to the intra-BMS ISR group (0.9% BMS vs. 5.2% DES; p value = 0.16). Conclusion: Our study suggests that the outcome of the patients presenting with ISR did not seem to be different between the two groups of DES-in-DES and DES-in-BMS at one-year follow-up, except for a trend toward more frequent TVR in the DES-in-DES group. Repeat DES implantation for DES restenosis could be feasible and safe with a relatively low incidence of MACE at mid-term follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2013

8. Preface

Author

Berger, Christian, Mousavi, Mohammad Reza, Wisniewski, Rafael, Berger, Christian, Reza Mousavi, Mohammad, and Wisniewski, Rafael

Published
2017

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results