1. A balanced evaluation of the evidence for adult neurogenesis in humans: implication for neuropsychiatric disorders
- Author
-
Reynold Spector and Alvaro Duque
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Histology ,Neurology ,Neurogenesis ,Stimulation ,Biology ,Article ,050105 experimental psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Neural Stem Cells ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Set (psychology) ,Neurons ,Mental Disorders ,General Neuroscience ,Dentate gyrus ,05 social sciences ,Cell Differentiation ,Cognition ,Human brain ,Neural stem cell ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Brain Injuries ,Anatomy ,Neuroscience ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
There is a widespread belief that neurogenesis exists in adult human brain, especially in the dentate gyrus, and it is to be maintained and, if possible, augmented with different stimuli including exercise and certain drugs. Here, we examine the evidence for adult human neurogenesis and note important limitations of the methodologies used to study it. A balanced review of the literature and evaluation of the data indicate that adult neurogenesis in human brain is improbable. In fact, in several high-quality recent studies in adult human brain, unlike in adult brains of other species, neurogenesis was not detectable. These findings suggest that the human brain requires a permanent set of neurons to maintain acquired knowledge for decades, which is essential for complex high cognitive functions unique to humans. Thus, stimulation and/or injection of neural stem cells into human brains may not only disrupt brain homeostatic systems, but also disturb normal neuronal circuits. We propose that the focus of research should be the preservation of brain neurons by prevention of damage, not replacement.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF