1. Retroperitoneal pancreas transplantation with a Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy for exocrine drainage.
- Author
-
Khubutiya MS, Dmitriev IV, Zhuravel NS, Balkarov AG, Storozhev RV, Anisimov YA, Kondrashkin AS, and Shmarina NV
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Jejunostomy methods, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Retroperitoneal Space surgery, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Graft Survival, Duodenum surgery, Pancreas Transplantation methods, Drainage methods, Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y methods, Kidney Transplantation methods
- Abstract
Background: Pancreatic transplantation is the only definitive surgical treatment for diabetes mellitus. Currently, most transplant centers use enteric exocrine drainage of pancreatic secretions; however, experts disagree on which part of the gastrointestinal tract is preferable for enteric anastomosis. We analyzed the outcomes of retroperitoneal pancreatic transplantation with enteric drainage of pancreatic secretions., Materials and Methods: We evaluated the outcomes of 60 simultaneous retroperitoneal pancreas-kidney transplantations. Based on the type of enteric anastomosis, the patients were divided into two groups: the study group consisted of 10 patients who underwent enteric drainage via Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy, and the control group included 50 patients who underwent exocrine drainage via duodenoduodenal anastomosis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the main parameters., Results: The rate of surgical complications did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0.05). Clavien IVb complications occurred only in the control group (n = 4.8%). The in-hospital pancreatic graft survival rate in both groups was 80%, whereas the recipient survival rates were 90% and 84%, in the study and control groups, respectively (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: Retroperitoneal pancreatic transplantation with exocrine drainage via a Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy is an effective alternative technique that reduces the rate of severe surgical complications., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine (№1–22 from 11.01.2022) and informed consent was taken from all individual participants. Patients were informed about all details of the surgical technique of pancreas transplantation, as well as warned about the risks associated with the new technique. Consent for publication not applicable. Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF