Search

Purpose: To assess and compare the efficacy of three treatment modalities for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO): conservative therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), and endovascular retinal surgery (ERS)., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of CRAO patients treated at the Toyama University Hospital. Their age range was 44-87 years; a balanced gender distribution was observed. The conservative therapy group included 13 eyes (6 males, 7 females, average age 74 years). HBOT group: 11 eyes from 10 patients (5 males, 5 females, average age 70 years). ERS group: 10 eyes (7 males, 3 females, average age 74 years). The treatments were as follows. Conservative group: ocular massage and sublingual nitroglycerin. HBOT: 60-min sessions at 2 atmospheres. ERS: vitrectomy followed by tissue plasminogen activator injection using a 47-ga. microneedle. Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR units, with statistical analyses by paired t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction., Results: The conservative group showed a slight visual acuity change from 1.96 ± 0.53 to 1.88 ± 0.56 (p = 0.56). The HBOT group exhibited a significant improvement from 1.79 ± 0.80 to 1.28 ± 0.81 (p = 0.007). The ERS group displayed the most substantial improvement, with scores moving from 1.98 ± 0.36 to 0.68 ± 0.49 (p = 0.0000413). The ERS group's outcomes were significantly superior to those of the other groups., Conclusion: These results suggest that while conservative treatment may not be sufficient, both HBOT and endovascular retinal surgery show promise, with the latter demonstrating the most significant improvement., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) by analyzing changes in visual acuity (VA) and enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) parameters. A comparative retrospective study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of all HBO-treated RAO patients in our department and comparing them with matched RAO patients who did not receive HBO treatment. All patients treated with HBO received treatment within 7 days of the onset of visual symptoms. Baseline characteristics were compared, and VA and OCT parameters were evaluated at baseline and follow-up visits. A total of 50 eyes from 50 patients were included, with 29 eyes in the HBOT group and 21 eyes in the control group. The mean BCVA of the HBOT group at the initial visit was 2.03 logMAR, which improved to 1.55 logMAR at 6 months, with the change being statistically significant (P < 0.01), while the control group's BCVA remained almost unchanged, from 2.1 to 2.11 logMAR (P = 0.762). The central choroidal thickness increased significantly in the HBOT group over the subsequent period. The central fovea, and outer retinal layer thickness in the HBOT group were significantly greater than those in the control group at the 6-month follow-up after treatment. HBOT appears to be effective in improving VA and inducing favorable changes in OCT parameters in patients with CRAO. It helps to preserve retinal layer thickness, especially in the outer retinal layer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

A man in his 90s presented with acute monocular loss of vision; the emergency department triage alerted the stroke team. He underwent urgent parallel assessments by the stroke and ophthalmology teams and was diagnosed with central retinal artery occlusion. The ultimate decision was made to manage him conservatively, rather than with intravenous thrombolysis, and his visual function has remained poor. We discuss the current evidence for using intravenous thrombolysis in people with central retinal artery occlusion and use this case to exemplify the practical issues that must be overcome if ongoing randomised clinical trials of central retinal artery occlusion confirm a definite benefit from using intravenous thrombolysis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Visual outcomes of acute central and branch retinal artery occlusions (CRAO/BRAO) are poor and acute treatment options are limited by delayed diagnosis. In the hyper-acute setting, the ocular fundus may appear "normal", making recognition challenging, but is facilitated by retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT), which is seldom available in emergency departments (ED). We evaluated the use of non-mydriatic ocular fundus photographs (NMFP) combined with OCT to facilitate ultra-rapid remote diagnosis and stroke alert for patients with acute vision loss presenting to the ED., Methods: Prospective evaluation of all CRAO/BRAO between 06/06/2023-06/06/2024 who had NMFP-OCT in our general ED affiliated with a stroke center., Results: Over 1 year, 22 patients were diagnosed with CRAO, 4 with BRAO. Five patients presented within 4.5 hours of vision loss onset, 6 within 4.5 to ≤12 hours and 15 within >12 to 24 hours. On average, NMFP-OCT was performed within 141 minutes of presentation to the ED (range 27- 422 minutes). Diagnosis of acute RAO was made remotely with NMFP-OCT within 4.5 hours in 4 patients, 2 of whom received intravenous thrombolysis. Of the 9 patients with NMFP-OCT within 12 hours of symptom onset, 5 patients had subtle retinal whitening on color fundus photograph, but all had OCT inner retinal hyper-reflectivity/edema., Conclusion: Implementation of NMFP-OCT in a general ED enables rapid remote diagnosis of CRAO/BRAO and facilitates initiation of an eye stroke protocol in acute patients. OCT complements color fundus photography and provides greater diagnostic accuracy in hyperacute cases with near-normal appearing ocular fundi., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Declaration of competing interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hyperlipidemia has many ocular manifestations, the most prevalent being retinal vascular occlusion. Hyperlipidemic lesions and occlusions to the vessels supplying the retina result in permanent blindness, necessitating prompt detection and treatment. Retinal vascular occlusion is diagnosed using different imaging modalities, including optical coherence tomography angiography. These diagnostic techniques obtain images representing the blood flow through the retinal vessels, providing an opportunity for AI to utilize image recognition to detect blockages and abnormalities before patients present with symptoms. AI is already being used as a non-invasive method to detect retinal vascular occlusions and other vascular pathology, as well as predict treatment outcomes. As providers see an increase in patients presenting with new retinal vascular occlusions, the use of AI to detect and treat these conditions has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce the financial burden on the healthcare system. This article comprehends the implications of AI in the current management strategies of retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) in hyperlipidemia and the recent developments of AI technology in the management of ocular diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All the authors have read the manuscript and declare no conflict of interest. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a rare and visually debilitating vascular condition characterized by sudden and severe vision loss. CRAO is a compelling target for intravenous alteplase (tPA) and endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT) due to pathophysiological similarities with acute ischemic stroke; however, the utility of these interventions in CRAO remains dubious due to limited sample sizes and potential risks. To assess usage and outcomes of tPA and MT in CRAO, we queried the National Inpatient Sample database using International Classification of Disease, Ninth and Tenth edition for patients with CRAO and acute ischemic stroke between 2010 and 2019. Our cohort of 5009 CRAO patients were younger with higher rates of obesity, hypertension, long-term anticoagulant use, and tobacco use compared to acute ischemic stroke patients. CRAO patients had lower rates of tPA administration (3.41% vs 6.21%) and endovascular MT (0.38% vs 1.31%) but fewer complications, including deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, acute kidney injury, and acute myocardial infarction (all P < 0.01). CRAO patients had lower rates of poor functional outcome (31.74% vs 58.1%) and in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs 5.64%), but higher rates of profound blindness (9.24% vs 0.58%). A multivariate regression showed no relationship between tPA and MT and profound blindness, although the limited sample size of patients receiving interventions may have contributed to this apparent insignificance. Further investigation of larger patient cohorts and alternative treatment modalities could provide valuable insights for revascularization therapies in CRAO to optimize visual restoration and clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) presents suddenly causing painless loss of vision that is often significant. Meaningful improvement in vision occurs in only 8% of patients with spontaneous reperfusion. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is considered to be of benefit if commenced before retinal infarction occurs. The Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS) guidelines on the management of CRAO were last amended in 2019. This survey questioned Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) hyperbaric medicine units (HMUs) about the incidence of CRAO cases referred and compared their subsequent management against the UHMS guidelines., Methods: An anonymous survey via SurveyMonkey® was sent to all 12 ANZ HMUs that treat emergency indications, allowing for multiple choice and free text answers regarding their management of CRAO., Results: One-hundred and forty-six cases of CRAO were treated in ANZ HMUs over the last five years. Most (101/146) cases (69%) were initially treated at a pressure of 284 kPa. This was the area of greatest difference noted in CRAO management between the UHMS guidelines and ANZ practice., Conclusions: Few ANZ HMUs strictly followed the UHMS guidelines. We suggest a more simplified management protocol as used by the majority of ANZ HMUs., (Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.)

Background: To evaluate the association between retinal artery/arteriole occlusion (RAO) and unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA)., Methods: Incident UIA patients from a nationwide cohort (n=253 240) were categorised into three groups based on subsequent treatment: observation (n=208 993), microsurgical clipping (n=14 168) and endovascular treatment (EVT) groups (n=30 079). The incidence and the incident time of RAO were analysed. HRs of RAO and associated risk factors were evaluated. Additionally, a hospital cohort comprising 2569 consecutive UIA patients treated at a tertiary hospital was analysed with detailed clinical information of UIAs., Results: In the nationwide cohort analysis, the incidence of RAO was significantly higher in EVT group than in observation and clipping groups, especially within 60 days (early RAO (within 60 days): HR=4.00, 95% CI: 2.44 to 6.56); delayed RAO (after 60 days): HR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.68). Multivariable analysis showed that the presence of chronic kidney disease (p=0.009) and use of a balloon microcatheter during the procedure (p=0.013) were associated with a higher risk of RAO. In hospital cohort analysis, 11 (0.8%) cases of RAO occurred after EVT, whereas none occurred after microsurgical clipping (p<0.001). Patients with RAO were younger and received balloon microcatheters more frequently than their counterparts. Ten cases of RAO (90.9%) occurred in paraclinoid aneurysms, where EVT was preferred over microsurgical clipping., Conclusions: Performing EVT for UIA may increase the risk of subsequent RAO. Care should be taken when treating paraclinoid aneurysms with balloon microcatheters., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of a standardised hyperbaric oxygen therapy protocol (HBOT) monitored by fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with retinal artery occlusion (RAO)., Methods: It is a prospective, non-comparative, monocentric study conducted between July 2016 and March 2022. All consecutive patients diagnosed with RAO within 7 days underwent visual acuity measurement, FA, macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-angiography. They received two daily HBOT sessions (2.5 atmosphere absolute, 90 min) until revascularisation assessed by FA. Complete ophthalmic follow-up was scheduled at day 14, day 21 and at 1 month. The main outcome measure was a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement defined as a decrease ≥0.3 logMAR at 1 month., Results: Thirty-one patients were included and received a mean number of 33.9 (13-56) HBOT sessions. Retinal revascularisation was observed in 48.4% and 87.1% of patients at days 14 and 21, respectively. The mean BCVA on referral and at 1 month was 1.51 logMAR and 1.10 logMAR, respectively. Fifteen (48.4%) patients achieved the main outcome measure. Six (19.4%) patients experienced minor barotrauma that did not require HBOT discontinuation. The univariate analysis showed that antiplatelet-treated patients (p=0.044) and patients with a poor initial BCVA (p=0.008) were more likely to achieve a BCVA improvement. OCT-angiography was not sensitive enough to diagnose RAO or assess revascularisation., Conclusion: In RAO patients monitored by FA until spontaneous revascularisation of the central retinal artery, HBOT was effective and safe., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: To assess visual acuity (VA) outcomes in a large cohort of patients diagnosed with nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), and to ascertain whether time from symptom onset to presentation, presenting VA, or conservative treatment delivery (anterior chamber paracentesis, ocular massage, intraocular pressure lowering drugs, hyperventilation, or some combination of those) impacted ultimate VA outcomes., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Subjects: The study included 794 patients who presented with CRAO between 2011 and 2020. Within this cohort, 484 individuals presented within 30 days of symptom onset and had comprehensive documentation regarding the details of their presentation, management, and follow-up ≥ 90 days postdiagnosis., Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients with a diagnosis of CRAO initially identified via International Classification of Diseases coding, followed by confirmation of diagnosis by 2 retina specialists. Cases of arteritic CRAO were excluded., Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity recovery, defined as improvement from ≤ 20/200 or worse at presentation to ≥ 20/100 ≥ 90 days after diagnosis., Results: Of the 794 identified patients, 712 (89.7%) presented with VA of ≤ 20/200. Similarly, 447 (92.4%) of the 484-patient subset that presented within 30 days and had comprehensive documentation presented with VA ≤ 20/200. Of the 441 of those patients with documented follow-up, 380 (86.2%) remained at that level. Of the 244 patients who presented within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, 227 (93%) presented ≤ 20/200 and 201 (92.6%) of the 217 of those with follow-up data did not improve beyond that threshold. There was no significant difference (P < 0.05) in final VA between patients presenting before versus after 4.5 hours from time of vision loss. There was also no significant difference (P < 0.05) in VA outcomes between patients who did or did not receive conservative treatment., Conclusions: This large retrospective study further highlights the poor visual prognosis for patients with CRAO. Earlier time to presentation did not seem to impact final VA outcome, nor did conservative treatment efforts. Efficacious evidence-based treatment options are needed for this patient population., Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Reperfusion therapies represent promising treatments for patients with Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (CRAO), but access is limited due to low incidence and lack of protocols. We aimed to describe the benefit of implementing a Retinal Stroke-Code protocol regarding access to reperfusion, visual acuity and aetiological assessment., Patients and Methods: Prospective cohort study performed at a Comprehensive Stroke Centre. Criteria for activation were sudden monocular, painless vision loss within 6 h from onset. Eligible patients received IAT when immediately available and IVT otherwise. All patients were followed by ophthalmologists to assess best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and visual complications, and by neurologists for aetiological workup. Visual amelioration was defined as improvement of at least one Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter from baseline to 1 week., Results: Of 49 patients with CRAO, 15 (30.6%) received reperfusion therapies (12 IVT, 3 IAT). Presentation beyond 6 h was the main contraindication. Patients receiving reperfusion therapies had better rates of visual improvement (33.3% vs 5.9%, p  = 0.022). There were no complications related to reperfusion therapies. Rates of neovascular glaucoma were non-significantly lower in patients receiving reperfusion therapies (13.3% vs 20.6%, p  = 0.701). Similar rates of atherosclerotic, cardioembolic and undetermined aetiologies were observed, leading to 10 new diagnosed atrial fibrillation and five carotid revascularizations., Conclusion: A comprehensive acute management of CRAO is feasible despite low incidence. In our study, reperfusion therapies were safe and associated with higher rates of visual recovery. A similar etiological workup than ischemic stroke led to of high proportion of underlying aetiologies., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Intravascular injection represents the most severe complication in fat transplantation procedures. Currently, the prognosis for patients who suffer from blindness due to fat transplantation-induced ocular vascular occlusion is far from optimistic., Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore and evaluate the efficacy and safety of arterial thrombolysis in the treatment of ocular vascular occlusion caused by fat transplantation., Methods: We analyzed the data of 12 patients who underwent intraarterial thrombolysis and conservative treatments for facial autologous fat grafting-associated ocular vascular occlusion. Among the cases, there were 6 instances of ophthalmic artery embolism and 6 cases of central retinal artery occlusion. All patients suffered with sudden blindness, sometimes accompanied by eye pain, ptosis, strabismus, skin necrosis at the injection site, or cerebral microinfarction. They received symptomatic conservative treatments and intraarterial thrombolysis, encompassing mechanical vessel recanalization, vessel dilation, and dissolution of thrombus constituents., Results: Following intraarterial thrombolysis, a noteworthy improvement in the blood flow of both the main trunk and peripheral branches of the ophthalmic artery was observed in the majority of patients when contrasted with their pretreatment status. One patient experienced a headache intraoperatively, while no significant discomfort was reported by the remaining patients. After conservative treatments and intraarterial thrombolysis, all patients experienced improvement in ocular symptoms, skin necrosis, and cerebral infarction. Three patients demonstrated improvement in visual acuity. These patients had surpassed the recommended time window for treatment, yet the occlusion of the ophthalmic artery was not complete., Conclusions: Intraarterial thrombolysis combined with conservative treatments achieves early perfusion and is expected to promote visual recovery. Hospitals that possess the necessary treatment capabilities are encouraged to establish this therapeutic pathway., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Arterial occlusions of the retina are potentially sight-threatening diseases which often result in profound visual loss. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the aetiology, discuss major risk factors, describe the management and systemic assessments and evaluate existing therapies. For this review, an extensive literature search in PubMed was performed. Emboli from the heart or the carotid arteries can cause ophthalmic artery occlusion (OAO), central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO). Most patients with arterial occlusions have vascular risk factors such as arterial hypertension, hyperhomocysteinaemia, carotid stenosis and atrial fibrillation, which also increase the risk of cerebral stroke and myocardial infarction. Therapies such as ocular massage, thrombolysis and anterior chamber paracentesis have been suggested but are still equivocal. However, it is evident that retinal artery occlusion should be immediately treated and accompanied by interdisciplinary collaboration, since early diagnosis and the proper treatment of possible risk factors are important to reduce the risk of further damage, recurrences, other vascular diseases and mortality.

Susac's syndrome (SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy that typically presents with the clinical triad of encephalopathy, hearing loss, and branch retinal artery occlusion. It has a wide range of possible presentations, and its pathogenesis remains uncertain. Fulminant and refractory cases are difficult to treat, and no standard treatment protocol has been established. However, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been described as an adjunctive therapy in several SuS cases. Herein we present a case of a 63-year-old male with debilitating encephalopathy and recent hearing and vision loss, who responded favorably to TPE. Given this and other published reports of plasma exchange therapy for SuS, treatment protocols should consider TPE in early stages of disease., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Apheresis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Many interventions for nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) are associated with serious complications and little effect on visual outcomes. We report on the findings of a Cochrane systematic review that searched seven databases for peer-reviewed articles reporting on treatments for acute nonarteritic CRAO. We assessed six randomized controlled trials, including interventions such as tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), isovolumic hemodilution, eyeball massage, intraocular pressure reduction, anticoagulation, vasodilation, oxygen inhalation, laser embolysis, transcorneal electrical stimulation, thrombolysis, pentoxifylline, and enhanced external counterpulsation. However, none of the randomized controlled trials demonstrated significant improvement in visual acuity at 1 month compared to observation, and some patients treated with t-PA experienced serious adverse effects including intracranial hemorrhage. Proposed interventions for acute nonarteritic CRAO may not be better than observation, but the evidence is uncertain. Larger, well-designed studies are necessary to determine the most effective management option for acute nonarteritic CRAO. [ Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:650-653.] .

Background: Guidelines recommend urgent evaluation for transient monocular vision loss (TMVL) and retinal artery occlusion (RAO), but emergency department (ED) utilisation for these conditions is unknown., Methods: We performed a retrospective longitudinal cross-sectional analysis of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (2011-2018), a database of all ED visits from a representative 20% sample of US hospital-based EDs. We identified patients aged 40 and older with a primary diagnosis of TMVL or RAO and calculated the weighted number of total visits and admission rate by year. We used joinpoint regression to analyse time trends and logistic regression to measure differences according to demographic characteristics and comorbidities., Results: There were an estimated 2451 ED visits for TMVL and 2472 for RAO annually in the USA from 2011 to 2018. Approximately 36% of TMVL and 51% of RAO patients were admitted. The admission rate decreased by an average of 4.9% per year for TMVL (95% CI -7.5% to -2.3%) and 2.2% per year for RAO (95% CI -4.1% to -0.4%), but the total number of ED visits did not change significantly over time. Elixhauser Comorbidity Index and hyperlipidaemia were associated with increased odds of hospital admission for both TMVL and RAO. There were also differences in admission rate by insurance payer and hospital region., Conclusion: Of the estimated 48 000 patients with TMVL or RAO annually in the USA, few are evaluated in the ED, and admission rates are less than for transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke and are decreasing over time., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: This study analysed the treatment outcomes of patients that received hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) for retinal artery occlusion (RAO) at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital in Brisbane, Australia between 2015 and 2021., Methods: Retrospective study from patient records including 22 eyes from 22 patients that received HBOT for either central RAO (17 patients) or branch RAO (five patients). Patients received the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital RAO protocol for their HBOT. Analysis included best corrected visual acuity pre- and post-treatment, subjective improvements, side effects and patient risk factors were also recorded., Results: Improvement in best corrected visual acuity was LogMAR -0.2 for central RAO on average with 8/17 (47%) experiencing objective improvement, 5/17 (29%) experienced no change and 4/22 (24%) experienced a reduction in best corrected visual acuity. Subjective improvement (colour perception or visual fields) was reported in an additional 4/17 patients, resulting in 12/17 (71%) reporting improvement either in visual acuity or subjectively. There was no improvement in the best corrected visual acuity of any of the five patients suffering from branch RAO. Cardiovascular risk factors present in the cohort included hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, previous cardiovascular events, cardiac disease and smoking. Limited side effects were experienced by this patient cohort with no recorded irreversible side effects., Conclusions: Hyperbaric oxygen treatment appears a safe, beneficial treatment for central RAO. No benefit was demonstrated in branch RAO although numbers were small. Increased awareness of HBOT for RAO resulting in streamlined referrals and transfers and greater uptake of this intervention may further improve patient outcomes., (Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.)

Objectives: The etiology of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is unclear in approximately 50% of patients, suggesting pathomechanical heterogeneity; moreover, little is known about outcomes according to etiology. This study investigated whether the presence of an embolic source affects outcome in CRAO., Methods: CRAO patients within 7 days of symptom onset were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical parameters, including initial and 1-month visual acuity, CRAO subtype, and brain images, were reviewed. CRAO etiology was categorized as CRAO with or without an embolic source (CRAO-E + and CRAO-E - ). Visual improvement was defined as a decrease in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution ≥0.3 at 1 month., Results: A total of 114 patients with CRAO were included. Visual improvement was noted in 40.4% of patients. Embolic sources were identified in 55.3% of patients, and visual improvement group rather than no improvement group was more commonly associated with the presence of an embolic source. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, CRAO-E + independently predicted visual improvement (odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 1.15-7.81, p = 0.025)., Discussion: CRAO-E + was found to be associated with a better outcome. CRAO-E + may be more prone to recanalization than that CRAO-E - ., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Retinal vascular occlusion not only threatens vision loss but is also associated with other systemic risk factors and vascular diseases. Interdisciplinary cooperation is of great importance in these patients. The risk factors hardly differ between arterial and venous retinal occlusions, which is due to the special anatomy of retinal vessels. Major underlying conditions associated with retinal vascular occlusion include arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cardiac disease, particularly atrial fibrillation, or vasculitis of large- and middle-sized arteries. Every new diagnosed retinal vascular occlusion should therefore be taken as an occasion to search for risk factors and possibly adjust an already existing therapy in order to prevent further vascular events., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a catastrophic ophthalmic emergency that severely impairs a patient's visual function, often reducing visual acuity to counting fingers or worse. Progress in CRAO research has provided new information regarding its epidemiological characteristics and led to useful assessments through various ophthalmic examinations. Additional insights about CRAO have been gained through studies of its pathophysiological mechanisms, improving intervention timing and enhancing patient prognosis. Treatment for CRAO has evolved, particularly with assistance from surgical instruments and surgical robots. Although surgical treatment is now possible, this option is not widely recognized by ophthalmologists. Conservative therapies have limited benefits compared with the natural course of disease. Recently, pars plana vitrectomy plus endovascular surgery has received considerable interest among ophthalmologists because of its potential efficacy in the treatment of CRAO. Considering the inconsistencies in rationale and efficacy of CRAO treatment modalities, it is important to distinguish between treatment effects and the natural courses of various CRAO subclasses. This narrative review explores progress in CRAO epidemiology, pathophysiology, ophthalmic examination, and treatment.

Objective: A central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) represents a form of ocular stroke with poor visual prognosis. CRAO shares a common pathophysiology with cerebral ischemic stroke but presents unique diagnostic and management challenges leading to variability in clinical practice. This study aims to assess the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of CRAO at a tertiary care centre in Canada over 2 years and elucidate potential areas for improvement in the care of these patients., Methods: Single-institution retrospective review including 27 patients diagnosed with CRAO from March 2018 to March 2020 in Edmonton, Alberta., Results: Most patients with CRAO presented to eye care providers (14 of 27); others presented to the emergency department (10 of 27) or family physicians (2 of 27). Three patients (11.1%) presented within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. At presentation, 81% of patients had visual acuity of 20/400 or worse in the affected eye. No patients received thrombolysis. The majority of CRAO cases had a nonarteritic etiology (92.6%). All patients had at least one pre-existing vascular risk factor. Forty-eight percent of patients received escalated medical therapy. Ipsilateral carotid stenosis was identified in 5 patients (18.5%); 3 patients required carotid endarterectomy. Two patients were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Two patients experienced symptomatic cerebral ischemia within 6 weeks of CRAO., Conclusions: The majority of patients with CRAO presented to eye care providers, and few present within the potential window for thrombolysis of 4.5 hours, highlighting the need for public awareness strategies. Our cohort highlights the significant rate of systemic comorbidity that exists in these patients., (Copyright © 2022 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Susac syndrome is a rare connective tissue disorder. The pathology affects the small vessels of the brain, retina, and inner ear, and therefore the main symptoms of the disease include encephalopathy, visual disturbances, and sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of this article is to review the current medical knowledge on Susac syndrome and to present our clinical experience regarding this disease entity. In the paper, we are also presenting a case of a 25-year-old patient who was diagnosed with Susac syndrome on the basis of clinical presentation and additional test results. Susac syndrome should be differentiated from multiple sclerosis and other causes of multifocal brain damage as early diagnosis and treatment play a key role in later prognosis.

Background: Acute non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) occurs as a sudden interruption of the blood supply to the retina and typically results in severe loss of vision in the affected eye. Although many therapeutic interventions have been proposed, there is no generally agreed upon treatment regimen., Objectives: To assess the effects of treatments for acute non-arteritic CRAO., Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2022, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 15 February 2022., Selection Criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any interventions with another treatment in participants with acute non-arteritic CRAO in one or both eyes.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology and graded the certainty of the body of evidence for primary (mean change in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA]) and secondary (quality of life and adverse events) outcomes using the GRADE classification., Main Results: We included six RCTs with 223 total participants with acute non-arteritic CRAO; the studies ranged in size from 10 to 84 participants. The included studies varied geographically: one in Australia, one in Austria and Germany, two in China, one in Germany, and one in Italy. We were unable to conduct any meta-analyses due to study heterogeneity. None of the included studies compared the same pair of interventions: 1) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) versus intravenous saline; 2) t-PA versus isovolemic hemodilution, eyeball massage, intraocular pressure reduction, and anticoagulation; 3) nitroglycerin, methazolamide, mecobalamin tablets, vitamin B 1 and B 12 injections, puerarin and compound anisodine (also known as 654-2) along with oxygen inhalation, eyeball massage, tube expansion, and anticoagulation compared with and without intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA); 4) transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) with 0 mA versus with 66% of the participant's individual electrical phosphene threshold (EPT) at 20 Hz (66%) versus with 150% of the participant's individual EPT (150%) at 20 Hz; 5) ophthalmic artery branch retrograde thrombolysis versus superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolysis; and 6) pentoxifylline versus placebo. There was no evidence of an important difference in visual acuity between participants treated with t-PA versus intravenous saline (mean difference [MD] at 1 month -0.15 logMAR, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.48 to 0.18; 1 study, 16 participants; low certainty evidence); t-PA versus isovolemic hemodilution, eyeball massage, intraocular pressure reduction, and anticoagulation (MD at 1 month -0.00 logMAR, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.23; 1 study, 82 participants; low certainty evidence); and TES with 0 mA versus TES with 66% of EPT at 20 Hz versus TES with 150% of EPT at 20 Hz. Participants treated with t-PA experienced higher rates of serious adverse effects. The other three comparisons did not report statistically significant differences. Other studies reported no data on secondary outcomes (quality of life or adverse events).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current research suggests that proposed interventions for acute non-arteritic CRAO may not be better than observation or treatments of any kind such as eyeball massage, oxygen inhalation, tube expansion, and anticoagulation, but the evidence is uncertain. Large, well-designed RCTs are necessary to determine the most effective treatment for acute non-arteritic CRAO., (Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Purpose: To summarize the existing treatment options regarding central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION), non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), and ocular ischemic syndrome (OIS), proposing an approach to manage and treat these patients., Methods: A systematic literature search of articles published since 1st January 2010 until 31st December 2020 was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science. Exclusion criteria included case reports, non-English references, articles not conducted in humans, and articles not including diagnostic or therapeutic options. Further references were gathered through citation tracking, by hand search of the reference lists of included studies, as well as topic-related European society guidelines., Results: Acute ocular ischemia, with consequent visual loss, has a variety of causes and clinical presentations, with prognosis depending on an accurate diagnosis and timely therapeutic implementation. Unfortunately, most of the addressed entities do not have a standardized management, especially regarding their treatment, which often lacks good quality evidence on whether it should or not be used to treat patients., Conclusion: Ophthalmologic signs and symptoms may be a warning sign of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, namely stroke. Most causes of acute ocular ischemia do not have a standardized management, especially regarding their treatment. Timely intervention is essential to improve the visual, and possibly vital, prognosis. Awareness must be raised among non-ophthalmologist clinicians that might encounter these patients. Further research should focus on assessing the benefit of the management strategies already being employed ., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Diffusion weighted imaging hyperintensity (DWI-H) has been described in the retina and optic nerve during acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). We aimed to determine whether DWI-H can be accurately identified on standard brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in non-arteritic CRAO patients at two tertiary academic centers., Materials and Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study that included all consecutive adult patients with confirmed acute non-arteritic CRAO and brain MRI performed within 14 days of CRAO. At each center, two neuroradiologists masked to patient clinical data reviewed each MRI for DWI-H in the retina and optic nerve, first independently then together. Statistical analysis for inter-rater reliability and correlation with clinical data was performed., Results: We included 204 patients [mean age 67.9±14.6 years; 47.5% females; median time from CRAO to MRI 1 day (IQR 1-4.3); 1.5 T in 127/204 (62.3%) and 3.0 T in 77/204 (37.7%)]. Inter-rater reliability varied between centers (κ = 0.27 vs. κ = 0.65) and was better for retinal DWI-H. Miss and error rates significantly differed between neuroradiologists at each center. After consensus review, DWI-H was identified in 87/204 (42.6%) patients [miss rate 117/204 (57.4%) and error rate 11/87 (12.6%)]. Significantly more patients without DWI-H had good visual acuity at follow-up (p = 0.038)., Conclusions: In this real-world case series, differences in agreement and interpretation accuracy among neuroradiologists limited the role of DWI-H in diagnosing acute CRAO on standard MRI. DWI-H was identified in 42.6% of patients and was more accurately detected in the retina than in the optic nerve. Further studies are needed with standardized novel MRI protocols., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the visual outcome of patients treated for non-arthritic central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) in a medical centre that uses hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as part of the standard of care (SOC) to medical centres that does not., Methods: The study included data from two tertiary medical centres. The medical records of all patients diagnosed with non-arthritic CRAO without a patent cilioretinal artery between January 2010 and December 2018 in two tertiary medical centres were reviewed., Results: One hundred and twenty-one patients were treated by HBOT and 23 patients received only SOC. In the HBOT group, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 2.89 ± 0.98 logMAR at presentation to 2.15 ± 1.07 logMAR upon the end of HBOT (P < 0.001), while the SOC group had no significant improvement, from 3.04 ± 0.82 logMAR at presentation to 2.80 ± 1.50 logMAR (P = 0.24). With adjustment for age, gender, and the duration of symptoms, final BCVA in the HBOT group was significantly better compared to the control group (P = 0.023). Rates of patients achieving vision of 20/200 or better were similar between groups (17.4% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.523)., Conclusion: Utilizing HBOT as part of the SOC for CRAO improves the final visual outcome. HBOT is safe and can be implemented, if available, as part of SOC in all tertiary medical centres., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.)

Background: Inadvertent intraarterial injection of soft tissue fillers during facial aesthetic procedures can result in serious adverse events including visual impairment and blindness. Once the retinal artery has been occluded, only a short window of opportunity exists before blindness becomes irreversible. All physicians should be prepared for the eventuality of intraarterial injection, despite its rarity., Objective: The aim of this document is to provide a simple and evidence-based protocol using the easy to remember acronym EYE-CODE: EYE (I call retinal referral center), C (check vision), O (optic nerve function), D (decrease intraocular pressure), and E (erase filler)., Methods: The EYE-CODE acronym incorporates 2 key components: (1) a systematic office-based protocol to first determine whether vision loss is present and to what extent and (2) a treatment strategy that can be started in the acute office setting and continued by an emergency ophthalmologist., Results: The protocol incorporates a crash kit of treatments readily available to an aesthetic physician combining measures to rapidly reduce intraocular pressure to allow the emboli to dislodge downstream with measures to improve retinal perfusion., Conclusion: EYE-CODE provides an up-to-date, one-stop reference for appropriate management of retinal artery occlusion induced by injection of soft tissue fillers., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Barbarino is a consultant and speaker for Merz, Allergan, Lumenis, Alastin Skincare, Skinceuticals, Syneron/Candela, and Sinclair Pharmaceuticals. Dr Fezza is a consultant, speaker and principal investigator for Allergan, a principle investigator for Merz Pharmaceuticals and Revance Therapeutics, a patent holder and equity owner with Visant Medical, and a speaker for Sente Skincare. Dr Banker has no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its rapid spread has resulted in unexplored clinical ophthalmological manifestations. This report aims to describe a series of retinal vascular anomalies diagnosed with the use of fluorescein angiography, following contraction of COVID-19., History and Signs: Symptoms reported by patients were central scotoma (one case), inferior scotoma (one case), and a sensation of mild loss of vision during the COVID-19 follow-up (four cases). Best-corrected visual acuity was preserved in all patients, apart from one, who had a visual acuity of 0.4, decimal scale (6/15, Snellen) in the left eye., Therapy and Outcome: Clinical manifestations included bilateral retinal vasculitis (two cases), branch retinal vein occlusion (one case), branch retinal artery occlusion (one case), hemi-central retinal vein occlusion (one case), and optic disc edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (one case) occurring 0 - 8 months after COVID-19 contraction. Serological testing was performed in every patient to exclude any other recognized cause of retinal vascular occlusion and inflammation and to confirm immunity against the novel coronavirus. None of the patients required any ocular treatment., Conclusions: Arterial and venous occlusive as well as inflammatory retinal vascular pathologies can occur both during and after the acute phase of COVID-19 as manifestations of ocular long-term effects of COVID-19 and should be included in the differential diagnosis of retinal occlusive pathologies. This case series suggests that careful investigations, including fundoscopy and fluorescein angiography, should be required in patients with visual complaints, both in the acute and long-term follow-up of COVID-19., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a vision-threatening condition with a potentially poor visual prognosis. Many different treatment modalities are suggested but controversy remains regarding effectiveness of these treatments. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in addition to analyzing retrospective data at our own tertiary care center regarding effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in treatment of CRAO., Methods: The PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library are searched from the date of database inception to September 2021 to conduct a review based on the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis), evaluating the role of HBOT in visual recovery of CRAO patients. In addition, a retrospective chart review of patients clinically diagnosed with CRAO at our university-based hospital (University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, USA) from year 2011 to 2021 was conducted., Results: After a review of 376 articles, three articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis, where a total of 207 patients received HBOT versus 89 patients that did not receive any form of oxygen therapy. Analysis of these results demonstrate that HBOT in CRAO patients does not enhance the final visual outcome (p = 0.83). Similar conclusion was also drawn from retrospective analysis of 48 patients (15 HBOT versus 33 controls) at our tertiary care center, where no visual benefit was observed in the HBOT group., Conclusions: HBOT does not appear to improve final visual outcome and concerns remain regarding adverse reactions such as barotrauma and generalized seizures. Large, randomized studies are required for further understanding of the role of HBOT in treatment of CRAO.

In the field of ophthalmology, central retinal artery occlusion is still one of the unsolved pathologies, as there is no widely accepted evidence-based therapeutic concept. Meta-analysis suggests that intravenous fibrinolysis might help to improve the outcome if performed within the first 4.5 hours after symptom onset. However, this short window of opportunity is often missed due to delays during diagnostic testing (e.g. time elapsed before performance of an ophthalmological examination) or patient-processing (referring the patient to a specialized medical facility). This article presents a diagnostic tool in the form of a simple questionnaire, comprising a medical history and examinations, which could help to minimize the time required to initiate the appropriate treatment., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht./The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a standardized hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy protocol in patients with retinal artery occlusion (RAO)., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in our tertiary care center from July 2016 to September 2019. Patients experiencing central RAO and branch RAO for less than seven days were included. Once the diagnosis was made, patients were urgently referred to the HBO2 department to receive a first 90-minute HBO2 session at a pressure of 2.5 ATA. Patients underwent two daily sessions seven days a week for at least 15 days. If no reperfusion was seen on fluorescein angiography on Day 15, treatment was continued for an additional week with an assessment on Day 21. The primary endpoint was BCVA improvement defined as a decrease by 0.3 logMAR at one month., Results: Twenty-eight patients were included during the study period. Fifty-seven percent of patients were treated more than 12 hours after the onset of the first symptoms. The mean BCVA was 1.5 logMAR at the time of referral and improved to 0.9 logMAR after HBO2 (p=0.001). A multivariate analysis identified a high blood pressure (p=0.039) and a low initial BCVA (p=0.005) as poor prognostic factors., Conclusion: Performing HBO2 sessions twice daily at a pressure of 2.5 ATA appears to be an effective and safe treatment for RAO., Competing Interests: The authors of this paper declare no conflicts of interest exist with this submission., (Copyright© Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society.)

Background: Acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) represents an ophthalmological emergency with neurological implications, which must be immediately investigated and treated. Intravenous thrombolysis could improve the prognosis only within the first 4.5 h due to limited retinal tolerance to ischemia. Accordingly, ophthalmological acute diagnostics should be reduced to the minimum necessary followed by immediate referral to a clinic with neurovascular expertise. The typical anamnesis is well-suited for triaging and should be carried out ín a standardized way in order to determine the onset of symptoms as exactly as possible. In addition to pathognomic findings in fundoscopy, there are characteristic ischemia-related changes in optical coherence tomography (OCT), which document ischemia in the inner retina and under some circumstances can provide inferences for the onset of ischemia., Objective: This review article summarizes the acute ophthalmological diagnostic management of acute CRAO with a focus on the typical OCT and transorbital ultrasound (TOUS) findings and discusses their potential use as ischemic biomarkers., Conclusion: Characteristic biomarkers make OCT an important diagnostic tool in the management of acute CRAO. Additional information can be obtained by TOUS. With an evidence-based treatment established in the future both tools could be used for indications for treatment and for estimating the prognosis., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a form of acute ischemic stroke which affects the retina. Intravenous thrombolysis is emerging as a compelling therapeutic approach. However, it is not known which patients may benefit from this therapy because there are no imaging modalities that adequately distinguish viable retina from irreversibly infarcted retina. The inner retina receives arterial supply from the central retinal artery and there is robust collateralization between this circulation and the outer retinal circulation, provided by the posterior ciliary circulation. Fundus photography can show canonical changes associated with CRAO including a cherry-red spot, arteriolar boxcarring and retinal pallor. Fluorescein angiography provides 2-dimensional imaging of the retinal circulation and can distinguish a complete from a partial CRAO as well as central versus peripheral retinal non-perfusion. Transorbital ultrasonography may assay flow through the central retinal artery and is useful in the exclusion of other orbital pathology that can mimic CRAO. Optical coherence tomography provides structural information on the different layers of the retina and exploratory work has described its utility in determining the time since onset of ischemia. Two experimental techniques are discussed. 1) Retinal functional imaging permits generation of capillary perfusion maps and can assay retinal oxygenation and blood flow velocity. 2) Photoacoustic imaging combines the principles of optical excitation and ultrasonic detection and - in animal studies - has been used to determine the retinal oxygen metabolic rate. Future techniques to determine retinal viability in clinical practice will require rapid, easily used, and reproducible methods that can be deployed in the emergency setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have conflicts of interest related to this data. This manuscript is not under review at any other journal. There are no redundant publications based on this dataset. All co-authors meet the ICMJE requirements for authorship., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a neuro-ophthalmological emergency necessitating adequate and comprehensive diagnosis. Its optimal management and treatment, however, are still under debate. This study aimed at identifying respective areas for improvement., Methods: We retrospectively analysed the medical records of patients with CRAO treated in our stroke unit between January 2016 and August 2020., Results: During the observational period, 101 patients with CRAO were admitted. We observed an increase in the rate of patients primarily admitted to the stroke unit from 52.2% to 97.4%. In addition, the thrombolysis rate - with thrombolysis performed on an individual basis - rose from 0% to 14.1%, coinciding with the implementation of an in-hospital management guideline. Almost 60% of all patients presented outside of the 4.5-h time window for thrombolysis; by far the most common reason not to deliver intravenous thrombolysis in our cohort was a prehospital delay to presentation (58.8%), with 44.4% of patients having consulted a private-practice ophthalmologist first. A total of 25 (32.5%) of 77 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had accompanying acute ischaemic stroke lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI of the brain. A possible aetiology of CRAO was identified in 41.4% of patients., Discussion: Public awareness of sudden unilateral visual loss as a presenting sign for stroke should be raised, increasing the chances for timely recognition in a hospital with ophthalmological expertise and a stroke centre. This is essential for ongoing and future prospective trials on this subject., (© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Purpose: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a form of acute ischemic stroke that causes severe visual loss and is a harbinger of further cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. There is a paucity of scientific information on the appropriate management of CRAO, with most strategies based on observational literature and expert opinion. In this scientific statement, we critically appraise the literature on CRAO and provide a framework within which to consider acute treatment and secondary prevention., Methods: We performed a literature review of randomized controlled clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, case reports, clinical guidelines, review articles, basic science articles, and editorials concerning the management of CRAO. We assembled a panel comprising experts in the fields of vascular neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, vitreo-retinal surgery, immunology, endovascular neurosurgery, and cardiology, and document sections were divided among the writing group members. Each member received an assignment to perform a literature review, synthesize the data, and offer considerations for practice. Multiple drafts were circulated among the group until consensus was achieved., Results: Acute CRAO is a medical emergency. Systems of care should evolve to prioritize early recognition and triage of CRAO to emergency medical attention. There is considerable variability in management patterns among practitioners, institutions, and subspecialty groups. The current literature suggests that treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator may be effective. Patients should undergo urgent screening and treatment of vascular risk factors. There is a need for high-quality, randomized clinical trials in this field.

BACKGROUND Periorbital abscesses are uncommon complications of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis; with the evolution of diagnostic and therapeutic methods, it is rare that the patient progresses to irreversible blindness. Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) rarely occur simultaneously and the factors that influence this occurrence are not well understood. CASE REPORT This is a case report of an immunocompetent healthy adolescent girl, who developed irreversible blindness caused by a periorbital abscess secondary to acute bacterial rhinosinusitis due to CRAO and CRVO. Despite 6 days of clinical treatment, including intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin-associated piperacillin with tazobactam), she had a large periorbital abscess and could not open her left eye. Therefore, she was transferred to a tertiary hospital; 1 day after her admission, she underwent surgical treatment to drain the abscess through external and endoscopic access. In addition, she received broad-spectrum antibiotics (meropenem with vancomycin) for 3 weeks. She was no longer able to perceive light with the left eye, despite her clinical improvement. This case report discusses the factors that could have contributed to this poor outcome, despite clinical and surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that there are several mechanisms that can lead to the loss of vision and when the indicated surgical intervention is delayed, it can increase the risk of visual sequelae.

The retinal vasculature is the only neurovascular system directly visible to the human eye, easily evaluated by fundoscopy and many imaging modalities. This window allows physicians to diagnose and treat retinal pathologies and detect systemic diseases including diabetes, hypertension, hypercoagulable/hyperviscosity syndromes, and vasculitis. Diabetic retinopathy is the most common retinal vascular disease, followed by retinal vein and artery occlusion. Patients with these conditions require medical optimization to prevent further damage to the eyes and to the other organs. Both the internists and medical subspecialists play a crucial role in the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of vision-threatening retinal vascular diseases., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is an ophthalmologic emergency that often results in permanent vision loss. Over 25% are associated with acute cerebral ischemia. In the absence of existing Level I treatment options, this study aims to examine institutional practice patterns and review the literature to develop a formalized approach to the treatment of CRAO in the era of ischemic stroke protocols., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of institutional practices in the workup and treatment of patients diagnosed with acute non-arteritic (NA) CRAO at a single center from January 2017 to August 2020., Results: Of 91 patients managed for acute NA-CRAO, 62.6% were male and average age was 66.4 years. Only 20.9% of patients presented within 4 h of symptom onset. 12.1% of patients had evidence of acute stroke on MRI, and 27.5% had ipsilateral internal carotid artery stenosis >50%. Half (52.7%) did not receive any acute treatment for CRAO, excluding antiplatelet/anticoagulation. 48.5% of patients undergoing acute medical treatment had improved visual acuity compared to 29.4% without treatment (p=0.14)., Conclusions: There is a lack of clear protocol for the management of NA-CRAO. While not reaching statistical significance, our experience mirrors the literature with patients undergoing medical treatment demonstrating improved visual acuity over those without treatment. Given the presence of acute ischemic stroke, carotid disease, and/or stroke risk factors in over 25% of patients with CRAO, multidisciplinary involvement and modern stroke algorithms should be considered for this disease., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a condition that causes sudden vision loss due to obstruction of the retinal artery, typically from a thrombotic or embolic source. It is often associated with atherosclerotic risk factors, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a history of cerebrovascular disease. CRAO often leads to a poor visual outcome as well as neovascularization of the iris, retina, and optic disc, which can exacerbate vision loss and cause pain. While there are several treatment modalities for CRAO, few have been proven to be effective in decreasing the effects of neovascularization. The use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is often used in the treatment of CRAO due to its ease of use and relatively benign side effect profile. This study aims to assess the degree of improvement in visual acuity (VA) and neovascularization following HBO2. Our data ultimately shows that 20% of patients developed neovascularization after HBO2 compared to 29.8% of those who did not undergo HBO2 (p<.05). Our findings suggest that HBO2 has a statistically significant protective effect against neovascularization and may improve long-term visual acuity., Competing Interests: The authors of this paper declare no conflicts of interest exist with this submission., (Copyright© Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society.)