Search

Pivotal clinical trials of B-cell maturation antigen-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CART)-cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) resulted in remarkable initial responses, which led to a recent US Food and Drug Administration approval. Despite the success of this therapy, durable remissions continue to be low, and the predominant mechanism of resistance is loss of CART cells and inhibition by the tumor microenvironment (TME). MM is characterized by an immunosuppressive TME with an abundance of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Using MM models, we studied the impact of CAFs on CART-cell efficacy and developed strategies to overcome CART-cell inhibition. We showed that CAFs inhibit CART-cell antitumor activity and promote MM progression. CAFs express molecules such as fibroblast activation protein and signaling lymphocyte activation molecule family-7, which are attractive immunotherapy targets. To overcome CAF-induced CART-cell inhibition, CART cells were generated targeting both MM cells and CAFs. This dual-targeting CART-cell strategy significantly improved the effector functions of CART cells. We show for the first time that dual targeting of both malignant plasma cells and the CAFs within the TME is a novel strategy to overcome resistance to CART-cell therapy in MM.

Development of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy has led to an unprecedented success against B-cell leukemia and lymphoma and resulted in U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment protocols. Despite the initial clinical response in B cell-related malignancies, high relapse rates suggest that much work is needed to uncover mechanisms of resistance. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the durable activity of CAR T-cells is limited, and CAR T-cell therapy success is lower than in other malignancies. T cells from these patients are vulnerable to a state of dysfunction because of stresses including chronic infection, rapid cell cycle on antigen recognition, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and cancer-related treatments. T cells are also introduced to additional stresses when cultured ex vivo during the CAR T-cell manufacturing process. All these factors contribute to the limited regenerative capacity of T cells, which can lead to CAR T-cell treatment failure. In this article, we review the challenges of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with CLL and discuss potential strategies to overcome these challenges.

Supplementary Figures and Legends

Supplemental Figure Video

Although chimeric antigen receptor T (CART)–cell therapy has been successful in treating certain hematologic malignancies, wider adoption of CART-cell therapy is limited because of minimal activity in solid tumors and development of life-threatening toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). There is a lack of a robust, clinically relevant imaging platform to monitor in vivo expansion and trafficking to tumor sites. To address this, we utilized the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as a platform to image and track CART cells. We engineered CD19-directed and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed CART cells to express NIS (NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA-CART, respectively) and tested the sensitivity of 18F-TFB-PET to detect trafficking and expansion in systemic and localized tumor models and in a CART-cell toxicity model. NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA-CART cells were generated through dual transduction with two vectors and demonstrated exclusive 125I uptake in vitro. 18F-TFB-PET detected NIS+CART cells in vivo to a sensitivity level of 40,000 cells. 18F-TFB-PET confirmed NIS+BCMA-CART-cell trafficking to the tumor sites in localized and systemic tumor models. In a xenograft model for CART-cell toxicity, 18F-TFB-PET revealed significant systemic uptake, correlating with CART-cell in vivo expansion, cytokine production, and development of CRS-associated clinical symptoms. NIS provides a sensitive, clinically applicable platform for CART-cell imaging with PET scan. 18F-TFB-PET detected CART-cell trafficking to tumor sites and in vivo expansion, correlating with the development of clinical and laboratory markers of CRS. These studies demonstrate a noninvasive, clinically relevant method to assess CART-cell functions in vivo.

Supplementary Table S1

The clinical efficacy of T-cell therapies based on T cells transduced with genes encoding tumor-specific T-cell receptors (TCR-T) is related to the in vivo persistence of the T cells. To improve persistence without modifying TCR affinity, we instead modified intracellular signaling, using artificial T cell–activating adapter molecules (ATAM), generated by inserting the intracellular domain (ICD) of activating T-cell signaling moieties into CD3ζ. ATAMs with the ICD of either CD28 or 4-1BB were generated, assembled into the TCR complex as a part of CD3ζ, and enhanced downstream signaling from the supramolecular activation cluster. ATAMs were retrovirally introduced into human CMV-specific or NY-ESO-1–specific TCR-transduced CD8+ T lymphocytes, and downstream functionality was then examined. ATAM-transduced NY-ESO-1 TCR-T cells were also investigated using the U266-xenograft mouse model. ATAMs were successfully transduced and localized to the cell membrane. ATAM-transduced CMV-specific T cells retained their cytotoxic activity and cytokine production against peptide-pulsed target cells without altering antigen-specificity and showed resistance to activation-induced cell death. Upon both single and repeated stimulation, CD3ζ/4-1BB–transduced T cells had superior proliferation to the CD3ζ-transduced T cells in both the CMV-specific and the NY-ESO-1 TCR-T models and significantly improved antitumor activity compared with untransduced T cells both in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model. ATAM-transduced TCR-T cells demonstrated improved proliferation and persistence in vitro and in vivo. This strategy to control the intracellular signaling of TCR-T cells by ATAM transduction in combination with various tumor-specific TCRs may improve the efficacy of TCR-T therapy. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(6); 733–44. ©2018 AACR.

pRetroX-TetOne vector sequence with CD19CAR and tEGFR

T cells genetically modified with a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CD19CAR) are remarkably effective against B-cell malignancies in clinical trials. However, major concerns remain regarding toxicities, such as hypogammaglobulinemia, due to B-cell aplasia or severe cytokine release syndrome after overactivation of CAR T cells. To resolve these adverse events, we aimed to develop an inducible CAR system by using a tetracycline regulation system that would be activated only in the presence of doxycycline (Dox). In this study, the second-generation CD19CAR was fused into the third-generation Tet-On vector (Tet-CD19CAR) and was retrovirally transduced into primary CD8+ T cells. Tet-CD19CAR T cells were successfully generated and had minimal background CD19CAR expression without Dox. Tet-CD19CAR T cells in the presence of Dox were equivalently cytotoxic against CD19+ cell lines and had equivalent cytokine production and proliferation upon CD19 stimulation, compared with conventional CD19CAR T cells. The Dox(+) Tet-CD19CAR T cells also had significant antitumor activity in a xenograft model. However, without Dox, Tet-CD19CAR T cells lost CAR expression and CAR T-cell functions in vitro and in vivo, clearly segregating the “On” and “Off” status of Tet-CD19CAR cells by Dox administration. In addition to suicide-gene technology, controlling the expression and the functions of CAR with an inducible vector is a potential solution for CAR T-cell therapy–related toxicities, and may improve the safety profile of CAR T-cell therapy. This strategy might also open the way to treat other malignancies in combination with other CAR or TCR gene–modified T cells. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(8); 658–68. ©2016 AACR.See related Spotlight by June, p. 643.

Sequence data of CD3zeta and ATAM

Sequence data of CD3 and ATAM

Although chimeric antigen receptor T (CART)–cell therapy has been successful in treating certain hematologic malignancies, wider adoption of CART-cell therapy is limited because of minimal activity in solid tumors and development of life-threatening toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). There is a lack of a robust, clinically relevant imaging platform to monitor in vivo expansion and trafficking to tumor sites. To address this, we utilized the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as a platform to image and track CART cells. We engineered CD19-directed and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed CART cells to express NIS (NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA-CART, respectively) and tested the sensitivity of 18F-TFB-PET to detect trafficking and expansion in systemic and localized tumor models and in a CART-cell toxicity model. NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA-CART cells were generated through dual transduction with two vectors and demonstrated exclusive 125I uptake in vitro. 18F-TFB-PET detected NIS+CART cells in vivo to a sensitivity level of 40,000 cells. 18F-TFB-PET confirmed NIS+BCMA-CART-cell trafficking to the tumor sites in localized and systemic tumor models. In a xenograft model for CART-cell toxicity, 18F-TFB-PET revealed significant systemic uptake, correlating with CART-cell in vivo expansion, cytokine production, and development of CRS-associated clinical symptoms. NIS provides a sensitive, clinically applicable platform for CART-cell imaging with PET scan. 18F-TFB-PET detected CART-cell trafficking to tumor sites and in vivo expansion, correlating with the development of clinical and laboratory markers of CRS. These studies demonstrate a noninvasive, clinically relevant method to assess CART-cell functions in vivo.

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell immunotherapy has yielded significant clinical success in treating certain hematological malignancies. However, despite high initial response rates, most patients eventually relapse. Resistance to CART cell therapy can stem from tumor cell mutations, T cell defects, and tumor microenvironment (TME) immunosuppression. Tumor cells can downregulate target antigen expression to evade CART cell detection or mutate death receptor pathways to resist CART cell cytotoxicity. Patient T cells can be intrinsically defective, and CART cells often undergo exhaustion. The TME is abundant with immunosuppressive cells and factors which contribute to suboptimal CART cell activity. Collectively, issues originating in tumor cells, T cells, and the TME present significant hurdles to long-term remission after CART cell therapy. Various strategies to combat CART cell resistance have shown promise in preclinical studies and early clinical trials and are crucial to achieving durable responses.

T cells genetically engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) have shown unprecedented results in pivotal clinical trials for patients with B cell malignancies or multiple myeloma (MM). However, numerous obstacles limit the efficacy and prohibit the widespread use of CAR T cell therapies due to poor trafficking and infiltration into tumor sites as well as lack of persistence in vivo. Moreover, life-threatening toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity, are major concerns. Efficient and sensitive imaging and tracking of CAR T cells enables the evaluation of T cell trafficking, expansion, and in vivo characterization and allows the development of strategies to overcome the current limitations of CAR T cell therapy. This paper describes the methodology for incorporating the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) in CAR T cells and for CAR T cell imaging using [

While chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy targeting CD19 (CART19) has shown remarkable success in the treatment of hematological malignancies, the durable response rates remain approximately 40% and there are limited solutions for CART cell therapy in the treatment of solid tumors. To further understand mechanisms of resistance, including CART cell exhaustion, we employed three independent approaches: 1) RNA and ATAC sequencing on unstimulated vs. exhausted healthy donor CART19 cells by utilizing an in vitro model for exhaustion, 2) RNA and ATAC sequencing on pre-infusion CART19 cell products from responders and non-responders in the Zuma-1 clinical trial that led to the FDA approval of axi-cel CART19 therapy, and 3) a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen in healthy donor CART19 cells using our in vitro model for exhaustion. In each of these approaches, IL-4 was identified as a regulator of CART cell dysfunction. In approach 1, ingenuity pathway analysis of genes that were both differentially accessible and expressed in exhausted compared with unstimulated CART19 cells revealed IL-4 as a top upstream regulator (p = 5E-6). In approach 2, IL-4 was one of two genes that were both upregulated and more accessible in CART19 cell products from non-responders (p < 5E-2). Finally, in approach 3, gene ontology enrichment analysis of genes that were positively selected during the genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen, revealed regulation of the IL-4 pathway as one of the top affected pathways (p = 1E-4). Together, our data indicates a role for IL-4 in CART cell dysfunction caused by exhaustion. Investigating this mechanism further, we saw an increase in the production of IL-4 as CART cells became exhausted (p = 4E-3). Treatment of CART19 cells with human recombinant IL-4 (hrIL-4) resulted in dysfunction as evident by a decrease in antigen specific cytotoxicity (p = 4E-3) and proliferative ability (p= 6.5E-2), as well as exhaustion-specific signs of dysfunction such as an increase in the expression of the inhibitory receptor, TIM-3 (p = 3E-3) and an increase in the transcription of the exhaustion-related transcription factor EOMES (p = 1E-2). Finally, we tested whether IL-4 neutralization enhances CART19 cell functions. Using a CD19+ JeKo-1 xenograft mouse model, we compared the combination treatment of CART19 cells and an IL-4 neutralizing monoclonal antibody (10 mg/Kg, clone # MP4-25D2) to CART19 cells and an IgG control. IL-4 neutralization in combination with CART19 cells resulted in reduced tumor burden (p = 4.6E-2), increased CART cell proliferation (p = 8E-3), and prolonged overall survival (p= 5E-2). In summary, our data indicates that 1) IL-4 induces CART cell dysfunction through a state of exhaustion and 2) IL-4 neutralization with a monoclonal antibody enhances CART cell therapy. As such, this novel combination therapy holds the potential to be translated to the clinic to improve durable responses from CART cell therapy. Citation Format: Carli Stewart, Michelle J. Cox, Reona Sakemura, Ekene J. Ogbodo, Ismail Can, Claudia Manriquez Roman, Kun Yun, Olivia Sirpilla, James H. Girsch, Truc Huynh, Elizabeth L. Siegler, Jenny J. Kim, Mike Mattie, Nathalie Scholler, Simone Filosto, Saad S. Kenderian. IL-4 depletion leads to the improvement of CART cell therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1153.

Introduction: PD-1 inhibits the cytotoxic T-cell functions via the interaction with its ligands (PDL1 and PDL2). Recently, our group showed a selective response (~40%) with PD-1 blocking antibody pembrolizumab in patients with Richter transformation (RT), particularly after prior exposure to ibrutinib (Wei Ding et al, Blood, 2017). Additionally, PD-1 showed an increased expression in tumor B-cells of patients with RT (Rong He et al, AJSP, 2018). Here we investigated the functional implications of the PD-1 signaling axis in lymphoma B-cell pathobiology. Methods: 26 CLL-involved lymph node (LN) and 20 RT-involved LN samples were tested for PD-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (mouse clone NAT105, Abcam). Then, we checked PD-1 expression in 10 lymphoma cell lines and 1 CLL cell line (MEC-1) by both, flow cytometry and Western blot (WB) analysis. Over-expression of PD-1 using pLEX-lentiviral system (Thermo Scientific) was evaluated for in vitro cell cycle regulation and in vivo tumor growth. Overexpression of PD-1 was further examined on the regulation of cell signaling pathways using human phospho kinase array kit (R&D) and WB analysis. Gene expression signatures in CLL and RT patients were also identified by Illumina-based RNA sequencing using Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-embedded (FFPE)-nodal tissue obtained by clinical biopsy (Tempus Labs; Chicago, IL). Results: The expression of PD-1 was significantly increased in RT-LN compared to CLL-LN (mean ± SEM in RT vs. CLL, 30.6% ± 4.7% vs. 11.5% ± 2.8%, p < 0.001) [Fig 1A]. PD-1 expression was highest in patients with RT where the last prior CLL therapy was ibrutinib. To test the role of PD-1 in lymphoma B-cells, its expression was assessed in lymphoma and CLL cell lines. The expression of PD-1 was found to be variable, but at very low-levels in lymphoma lines OCI-LY7 and OCI-LY19 (data not shown). Constitutive lentiviral (pLEX-PD-1)-mediated overexpression of PD-1 in OCI-LY7 and OCI-LY19 cells led to increased cell growth (1.4 and 1.9 fold compared to original lines on day 4, respectively, Fig 1BI-II), which was further confirmed by cell cycle analysis which showed an increase in S phase by 20.4% and 24.53% in OCI-LY7 and OCI-LY19 cells (Fig 1B III), respectively. When the luciferase + PD-1 expressing OCI-LY7 cells were injected intravenously (1X106 cells) into NSG mice, increased tumor growth was observed at 22 days of follow up by bioluminescence imaging (p Conclusion: Our data support the notion that PD-1 overexpression in lymphoma cells modifies cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo and regulates the function of phosphatase SHP and p53- pathways. These findings also indicate that aggressive lymphoma or CLL leukemic cells have the ability to hijack the PD-1 pathway and may result in downregulation of the p53 mediated DNA repair. This novel information provide for new strategies to further evaluate the interaction of checkpoint signals with DNA repair pathway, and possibly provide novel targets for Richter's transformation. Disclosures Ding: alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sakemura:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding. Liu:Eisal: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GRAIL: Research Funding; Menarini Silicon Biosystems: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Tesaro: Research Funding. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Ansell:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Kenderian:Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Kay:Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

With the development of various strategies of anti-CD19 immunotherapy for treatment of B cell malignancies, it remains to be elucidated whether CD19 targeting with a monoclonal antibody impairs subsequent CD19 targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy. In this study, we evaluated the potential interference between the CD19 targeting monoclonal antibody tafasitamab and CART19 treatment (using a construct similar to the FDA approved therapy, FMC63-41BBζ, tisagenlecleucel) in preclinical lymphoma and leukemia models. For in vitro assays, the CD19 + cell lines JeKo-1 (mantle cell lymphoma), Nalm6 (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), and OCI-Ly7 (diffuse large B cell lymphoma) were used. When CART19 were co-cultured with CD19 + tumor cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of tafasitamab (10-400 µg/mL) or the isotype control, an impairment of CART19 functions at the highest concentration of tafasitamab was observed. However, when tafasitamab was cocultured with tumor cells overnight and removed from the culture by washing, there was no impairment of CART19 anti-tumor activity or effector functions compared to a pre-culture with isotype control. We then aimed to validate these findings in xenograft mouse models by determining whether prior tafasitamab treatment impairs subsequent CART cell function. First, a two-step JeKo-1 xenograft model was created through inoculation of 1x10 6 luciferase + JeKo-1 cells to immunocompromised NOD-SCID-γ -/- (NSG) mice via tail vein injection. One week later, tumor burden was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and mice were randomized to receive either 1) PBS (Group 1) or 2) 10 mg/kg of tafasitamab (Group 2) (Fig. 1A). Treatment was performed until the mice reached the endpoint due to the high tumor load. When reaching the endpoint, mice were euthanized and spleen was harvested. Splenic cells were then injected to naïve NSG mice. Two weeks after the inoculation of splenic cells (PBS or tafasitamab treated), mice were imaged with BLI and randomized according to their tumor burden to receive 2x10 6 of 1) untransduced T cells (UTD) or 2) CART19 (i.v.) (Fig. 1B). Mice, treated with CART19 demonstrated potent anti-tumor effects and showed prolonged survival compared to UTD control mice. Interestingly, CART19-treated mice inoculated with Group 2 splenic cells (pretreated with tafasitamab) showed a significantly better tumor control and overall survival compared with mice engrafted Group 1 splenic cells (PBS pretreatment) (Fig. 1C). This finding led us to further investigate the effects of prior tafasitamab therapy on subsequent CART19 treatment. In this context, we studied the sequential treatment with tafasitamab and CART19 in an additional JeKo-1 xenograft model (Fig. 1D). In brief, NSG mice were inoculated with luciferase + JeKo-1 on day -14. On day -8, mice were imaged and randomized to the PBS (Group I) or tafasitamab (10 mg/kg) group. On day -1 tafasitamab treated mice were imaged again, randomized to the tafasitamab discontinuation (Group II) or continuation (Group III). Treatment with PBS was continued in Group I. All groups were administered with 1x10 6 of CART19 on day 0. Cotreatment of JeKo-1 xenografts with tafasitamab and CART19 led to impaired anti-tumor activity presumably as a result of CD19 binding competition between tafasitamab and CART19 (Group III). Mice treated with tafasitamab followed by CART19 had improved tumor control compared to mice treated with PBS followed by CART19 (Fig. 1E-F). Serial peripheral blood analysis demonstrated that mice from Group I showed the highest CART19 expansion on day 10. Strikingly, Group II exhibited weak CART19 expansion at day 10, but strongest expansion on day 23 (Fig. 1G). We therefore hypothesized that prior treatment with tafasitamab results in modulation of CART19 cell activation. To test this hypothesis, spleens of satellite mice were harvested 24 hours after CART19 administration. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the mice from Group II showed significantly lower CD69 and HLA-DR expression on CART19 cells compared with Group I, and reduced apoptosis as measured by the Annexin assay (Fig. 1H-I). In summary, concomitant treatment of tafasitamab and CART19 led to impaired anti-tumor activity while, in contrast, sequential treatment of tafasitamab and CART19 did not inhibit CART19 anti-tumor activity but rather promoted anti-tumor effects in xenograft models. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Augsberger: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Schanzer: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Patra-Kneuer: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Heitmüller: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Steidl: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Endell: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Ding: DTRM: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parikh: Pharmacyclics, MorphoSys, Janssen, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, and Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Verastem Oncology, and AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay: Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Targeted Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CytomX Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding. Nowakowski: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys: Research Funding; Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cox: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Kenderian: Humanigen, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Owing to the difficulty in isolating T cells from human biopsy samples, the characteristics of T cells that are infiltratinghuman acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) tissues remain largely uninvestigated. In the present study, TCR-β deep sequencing of various GVHD tissue samples and concurrent peripheral blood obtained from transplant recipients was performed in combination with functional assays of tissue-infiltrating T cell clones. The T cell repertoire was more skewed in GVHD tissues than in the peripheral blood. The frequent clonotypes differed from tissue to tissue in the same patient, and the frequent clonotypes in the same tissue differed from patient to patient. Two T cell clones were successfully isolated from GVHD skin of a patient. In a cytotoxicity assay, both Tcell clones lysed patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells, but not donor-derived Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cells. Their clonotypes were identical to the most and second most frequent T cell clonotypes in the original GVHD skin and accounted for almost all of the skin-infiltrating T cells. These results suggest that human acute GVHD may result from only a few different alloreactive cytotoxic T cell clones, which differ from tissue to tissue and from patient to patient. The characterization of T cells infiltrating human GVHD tissues should be further investigated.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has yielded unprecedented outcomes in some patients with hematological malignancies; however, inhibition by the tumor microenvironment has prevented the broader success of CART cell therapy. We used chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as a model to investigate the interactions between the tumor microenvironment and CART cells. CLL is characterized by an immunosuppressive microenvironment, an abundance of systemic extracellular vesicles (EVs), and a relatively lower durable response rate to CART cell therapy. In this study, we characterized plasma EVs from untreated CLL patients and identified their leukemic cell origin. CLL-derived EVs were able to induce a state of CART cell dysfunction characterized by phenotypical, functional, and transcriptional changes of exhaustion. We demonstrate that, specifically, PD-L1(+) CLL-derived EVs induce CART cell exhaustion. In conclusion, we identify an important mechanism of CART cell exhaustion induced by EVs from CLL patients.

BackgroundIn COVID-19, high levels of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and inflammatory myeloid cells correlate with disease severity, cytokine storm, and respiratory failure. With this rationale, we used lenzilumab, an anti-human GM-CSF monoclonal antibody, to treat patients with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia.MethodsHospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and risk factors for poor outcomes were treated with lenzilumab 600 mg intravenously for three doses through an emergency single-use IND application. Patient characteristics, clinical and laboratory outcomes, and adverse events were recorded. All patients receiving lenzilumab through May 1, 2020 were included in this report.ResultsTwelve patients were treated with lenzilumab. Clinical improvement was observed in 11 out of 12 (92%), with a median time to discharge of 5 days. There was a significant improvement in oxygenation: The proportion of patients with SpO2/FiO2 < 315 at the end of observation was 8% vs. compared to 67% at baseline (p=0.00015). A significant improvement in mean CRP and IL-6 values on day 3 following lenzilumab administration was also observed (137.3 mg/L vs 51.2 mg/L, p = 0.040; 26.8 pg/mL vs 16.1 pg/mL, p = 0.035; respectively). Cytokine analysis showed a reduction in inflammatory myeloid cells two days after lenzilumab treatment. There were no treatment-emergent adverse events attributable to lenzilumab, and no mortality in this cohort of patients with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia.ConclusionsIn high-risk COVID-19 patients with severe and critical pneumonia, GM-CSF neutralization with lenzilumab was safe and associated with improved clinical outcomes, oxygen requirement, and cytokine storm.

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy has been remarkably successful in treating a subset of patients with hematological malignancies. However, it is associated with significant toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (NT). Furthermore, the rate of durable responses after CART19 therapy is low, and most patients develop resistance to the therapy. One of the predominant mechanisms for CART cell resistance is intrinsic T cell dysfunction which leads to a suboptimal CART product. The Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has been shown to favorably modulate CART phenotype and function through downregulation of inhibitory receptors and enhancement of CART cell efficacy in preclinical models and early clinical studies. However, ibrutinib is an irreversible receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor, and thus there are concerns that it inhibits CART cell proliferation and expansion. In contrast to ibrutinib and other BTK inhibitors, vecabrutinib has recently emerged as a potent, reversible, non-covalent BTK inhibitor that can block the activity of both wild type and C481 mutant BTK as well as interleukin-2-inducible T-cell kinase (ITK). We hypothesized that treatment with vecabrutinib improves CART19 antitumor efficacy through the reversible inhibition of BTK/ITK, independent of its antitumor effect. To test this hypothesis, we assessed whether vecabrutinib potentiates CART19 cytotoxicity against CD19 + tumor cells. Killing of the CD19 + mantle cell lymphoma cell line, JeKo-1, was significantly increased when CART19 were combined with vecabrutinib (Fig. 1A). Of note, vecabrutinib did not induce antitumor activity in this model as a single agent (Fig. 1A). In addition, vecabrutinib (10 µM) treatment of CART19 resulted in enhanced antigen-specific proliferation (Fig. 1B). Next, we aimed to study the direct impact of vecabrutinib on CART19 cytokine production. We measured the levels of multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines in the supernatant of CART19 co-cultured for 3 days with JeKo-1 cells and vecabrutinib. Vecabrutinib did not impair CART19 degranulation, as measured by flow cytometric assessment of CD107a expression (Fig. 1C). Cytokines known to play a crucial part in the development of CRS, such as IL-6, IL-10, and MIP-1β were significantly downregulated in cocultures with vecabrutinib (Fig. 1D-F). We then investigated whether the addition of vecabrutinib to CART19 caused a synergistic antitumor effect in vivo. We used our established JeKo-1 lymphoma xenograft models. Here NSG mice were engrafted with CD19 + luciferase + JeKo-1 cells. Mice were then imaged for engraftment and randomized to treatment with 1) untransduced control T cells, 2) CART19 with vehicle, or 3) CART19 with vecabrutinib 50 mg/kg BID administered via oral gavage over a period of 4 weeks. Vecabrutinib combination with CART19 treatment led to sustained antitumor activity (Fig.1G) and increased CART19 proliferation (Fig.1H). Encouragingly, mice treated with vecabrutinib better maintained their body weight following CART19 infusion, suggesting possibly dampened toxicity (Fig.1I). We also measured serum cytokine levels from patients on a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03037645) testing vecabrutinib in B cell malignancies at baseline and four weeks after treatment. We found that vecabrutinib significantly reduces the levels of multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines linked to CART cell toxicity, including MIP-1β, IP-10, and TNF-a (Fig. 1J-L), further validating our preclinical findings. Finally, we interrogated the transcriptome of CART19 co-cultured with JeKo-1 with or without vecabrutinib. Total RNA sequencing of activated CART19 highlighted a significant enhanced expression of multiple genes involved in the PI3K/AKT and Th1 pathways compared to antigen stimulated CART19 alone (Fig.1M, N). These results could explain the enhanced proliferation and cytotoxicity induced by vecabrutinib. In summary, we demonstrate for the first time that using the reversible BTK inhibitor, vecabrutinib, is a potent and a novel strategy to favorably modulate CART19 function by increasing their efficacy and decreasing toxicity. Further studies are currently underway to compare the effect of reversible versus irreversible BTK/ITK inhibition on CART functions and to further validate the mechanisms responsible for the observed effects. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Cox: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Fox: Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Ding: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; DTRM: Research Funding. Parikh: Pharmacyclics, MorphoSys, Janssen, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, and Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Verastem Oncology, and AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay: MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CytomX Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Targeted Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kenderian: Humanigen, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background Dasatinib has shown promising anti-leukemic activity against chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, patients receiving dasatinib frequently require dose reductions and treatment interruptions (treatment alteration). Methods We prospectively analyzed the frequency and significance of treatment alteration during dasatinib therapy in patients with CML. In all patients, trough plasma concentrations of dasatinib (Cmin) at steady state were assessed on day 28 of therapy. Results 28% of patients had their doses reduced at a median of 42 days, and 25% of patients had temporarily interrupted at a median of 54 days after treatment initiation. The overall dasatinib treatment alteration-free rate at 1 year was 66%. Age was significantly correlated with Cmin on day 28 (p = 0.014), and the correlation remained significant after adjusting dasatinib dose (g), body weight (kg) (Cmin/D/W) (p = 0.026). In the univariate analysis, deep molecular response, advanced PS, higher Cmin/D/W were associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment alteration (HR 4.19, 95% CI: 1.06–16.60, p = 0.041; HR 5.26, 95% CI: 1.33–20.80, p = 0.018; and HR 10.15, 95% CI: 2.55–40.48, p = 0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, advanced PS and higher Cmin/D/W were correlated with the incidence of treatment alteration (HR 4.78, 95% CI: 1.01–22.70, p = 0.049; HR 6.17, 95% CI: 1.17–32.50, respectively). Conclusion Current data demonstrate that patients treated with dasatinib who displayed a high Cmin/D/W value and/or advanced PS were at a high risk for altered treatment.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cell therapy has resulted in unprecedented outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies, which led to the FDA approval for several indications. However, CART19 cell therapy is limited by the development of severe life-threatening toxicities, as well as by the limited rates of durable response. It has become apparent that myeloid cells contribute to the development of both CART cell toxicity and also to the inhibitory tumor microenvironment. We and others have identified that granulocyte-monocyte-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) depletion results in decreased myeloid activation, reduced toxicities, and enhancement of CART19 cell therapy efficacy in pre-clinical models. Furthermore, we observed that GM-CSF knockout (GM-CSF k/o) in CART19 cells resulted in the improvement of their functions (in vitro and in vivo). These findings suggest that there is also a direct effect of GM-CSF on CART19 cells, which is independent of the GM-CSF impact on myeloid cell activation. To further evaluate this, we first examined GM-CSF receptor alpha (GM-CSFRα) expression by flow cytometry on resting and activated CART19 cells (using FMC63-41BBζ). When CART19 cells were stimulated with either anti-CD3/CD28 beads or lethally irradiated (120 Gy) CD19 + Nalm6 cells (B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cancer cell line), GM-CSFRα expression was upregulated upon both T cell receptor (TCR) (data not shown) and CAR stimulation (Figure 1A). Having demonstrated that GM-CSFRα is significantly upregulated on stimulated CART19 cells, we aimed to determine the impact of GM-CSF neutralization (clinical-grade anti-GM-CSF antibody, lenzilumab, 10 µg/mL) versus GM-CSFRα blockade (research-grade antibody, 10 µg/mL) on CART19 cell function and CART cell-monocyte interactions. An IgG isotype antibody was used as a control antibody. Neither the GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, nor GM-CSFRα blocking antibody, had any impact on CART19 cell antigen-specific killing against the CD19 + JeKo-1 cells (mantle cell lymphoma cancer cell line), in the presence or absence of CD14 + monocytes (ratio 1:1:1) isolated by magnetic beads from healthy donors (Figures 1B-C). Next, we compared the effects of GM-CSF neutralization versus GM-CSFRα blockade on CART19 cell antigen-specific proliferation. Here, CART19 cells were co-cultured with lethally irradiated CD19 + cell line JeKo-1 at 1:1 ratio in the presence of 10 µg/mL of the GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, increasing doses of the GM-CSFRα blocking antibody (10-100 µg/mL), or an IgG control. The absolute number of CART cells was measured by flow cytometry on day 5. GM-CSF neutralization did not affect CART19 cell proliferation, but GM-CSFRα blocking antibody significantly inhibited CART19 cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Then, we assessed the effects of GM-CSF neutralizing antibody (20 µg/mL) versus GM-CSFRα blocking antibody (20 µg/mL) on CART19 cell antigen-specific proliferation in the presence of healthy donor monocytes (ratio 1:1:0.5) on day 3. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that GM-CSF neutralization, but not GM-CSFRα blockade, mitigated monocyte-suppression of CART19 antigen-specific proliferation (Figure 1E). In summary, our findings indicate significant differences on CART cell functions and CART cell-monocyte interactions when a specific cytokine, GM-CSF, is neutralized compared to blocking its receptor. Further mechanistic studies are ongoing to assess the functions of GM-CSFRα k/o and GM-CSF k/o CART cells. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh: Pharmacyclics, MorphoSys, Janssen, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, and Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Verastem Oncology, and AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; CytomX Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Targeted Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Durrant: Humanigen Inc.: Current Employment. Ahmed: Humanigen Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chappell: Humanigen Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Cox: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Kenderian: Humanigen, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Introduction: It has become increasingly apparent that chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell activation and differentiation level is an important determinant of CART cell fate and response to therapy. In this study, we aimed to 1) measure levels of activation-induced surface death receptors and ligands on CART cells; 2) investigate how CART cell activation could impact their fitness and clinical responses, and 3) identify cell-based targets to modulate CART cell activation, apoptosis, and cytotoxicity to improve anti-tumor activity. Methods: We performed flow cytometric studies on ex-vivo stimulated, clinically annotated CART products of patients with large B cell lymphoma from the pivotal ZUMA-1 clinical trial that led to FDA-approved Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-Cel). We investigated possible correlations of a number of surface death receptors and ligands with T cell differentiation status and post-infusion CART cell expansion, utilizing samples from ZUMA-1 patients who achieved a complete response as a best outcome ('responders') vs patients who achieved stable or progressive disease('non-responders'). CART cell effector functions in vitro were measured, and CART apoptosis was assessed using Annexin V. For in vitro and in vivo functional studies, we used CART19 generated from healthy donors (HD CART19) as indicated in the specific experiment. CRISPR/Cas9 was employed during CART cell production to disrupt specific genes. A xenograft model of lymphoma was used to investigate the in vivo antitumor activity of CART19. Results: Following an ex vivo stimulation of Axi-Cel products with CD19 + target cells, we observed upregulation of death receptors and ligands in CART19 from non-responders, compared to responders. We also observed a possible association between such upregulated surface markers with CART cell differentiation as measured by CCR7 expression. In an extended in vitro co-culture assay, where HD CART19 cells were repeatedly stimulated through the CAR, we found that tumor necrosis factor α receptor 2 (TNFR2), unlike other death receptors and ligands, was persistently elevated, suggesting a possible role for TNFR2 in long-term antigen-dependent CART19 dysfunction (Figure 1A). We further found that HD CART19 upregulate TNFR2, but not TNFR1, upon CAR stimulation (Figure 1B). While non-specific TCR activation (CD3 stimulation) of HD CART19 cells protected them from activation-induced apoptosis, antigen-specific activation through the CAR resulted in significant initiation of apoptosis within 2 hours of stimulation (Figure 1C). Having identified a possible association between TNFR2 and CART19 dysfunction, we aimed to study the impact of TNFR2 knockout on HD CART19 functions. Using CRISPR/Cas9 during CART cell manufacturing, we generated TNFR2 k/o HD CART19 cells with a knockout efficiency of around 50%, where the expression levels of TNFR2 in activated CART19 cells were reduced, compared to control CART19 cells (with non-targeting gRNA CRISPR/Cas9, Figure 1D). TNFR2 k/o CART19 cells demonstrated reduced early activation surface markers compared to control CART19, as measured by CD25 and CD69 surface expression (Figure 1E), reduced apoptosis initiation as measured by the Annexin V assay (Figure 1F), and enhanced antigen-specific proliferation and cytotoxicity (Figure 1G). Finally, in an in vivo xenograft model of CD19 + lymphoma, TNFR2 k/o CART19 resulted in enhanced CART cell expansion and anti-tumor activity (Figure 1H). Conclusions: Our results indicate that TNFR2 plays a role in early activation and apoptosis initiation of CART19 following CAR stimulation with CD19 + target cells and present TNFR2 knockout as a strategy to enhance CART19 anti-tumor activity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cox: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Ding: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parikh: Pharmacyclics, MorphoSys, Janssen, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, and Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Verastem Oncology, and AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay: Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Targeted Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CytomX Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scholler: Kite: Current Employment. Bot: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Travel support. Mattie: Kite: Current Employment. Kim: Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment. Filosto: Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Tusk Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: or other intellecular property; Gilead Sciences: Other: stock or other ownership . Kenderian: Humanigen, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Recent successes and FDA approvals of CD19 redirected chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy have been achieved in pivotal clinical trials in patients with B cell malignancies. However, durable response rates in non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma (B-NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are low. Tumor-associated macrophages have emerged as key mediators of tumor-induced CART cell immunosuppression. Axl receptor tyrosine kinase (Axl-RTK) is overexpressed in various human cancers including B-NHL or CLL and correlates with poor overall survival. Thus, several Axl-RTK inhibitors are currently being investigated in clinical trials. We have previously reported that the Axl-RTK inhibitor TP-0903 modulates CART19 function by Th1 polarization. Moreover, we observed a significant reduction in myeloid-derived cytokines in preclinical models. This led us to hypothesize that Axl-RTK inhibition also modulates monocytes which in turn affects CART function. To test our hypothesis, we interrogated the interactions between Axl-RTK inhibition, monocytes, and CART. First, we isolated CD14+ monocytes from peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors by magnetic negative selection. Flow cytometric analysis revealed a robust Axl expression on monocytes (Fig.1A). Monocytes were maintained in ImmunoCult Macrophage Medium (STEMCELL Technologies) and differentiated with lipopolysaccharide and interferon-γ for M1-type and interleukin (IL)-4 for M2-type macrophages. After confirming the macrophage phenotypes, cells were assessed for Axl expression. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that M2-type macrophages expressed higher Axl compared to M1 macrophages (Fig.1B). Then, we treated PBMCs from healthy donors with TP-0903 for 24 hours to determine the specific cell types affected by Axl-RTK inhibition. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that monocytes were significantly inhibited by TP-0903 compared to B cells or T cells (Fig.1C). Having demonstrated that TP-0903 strongly suppresses monocytes and that M2-type macrophages express Axl on their surface, we then performed a cytotoxicity assay against CD19+ mantle cell lymphoma cell line, JeKo-1, to study the impact of Axl-RTK inhibition on monocyte-induced CART suppression. We used CART19 generated in our laboratory (FMC63-41BBζ). CART19, JeKo-1, and M2-type macrophages were co-cultured at 1:2:1 ratio and incubated for 3 days. The data revealed that M2-type macrophages strongly suppress CART19 killing (Fig.1D) which could be overcome with TP-0903 (Fig.1E). Next we studied monocyte-induced CART19 suppression with antigen-specific proliferation. CART19, JeKo-1, and monocytes were co-cultured at 1:5:1 ratio and incubated for 5 days. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that in the presence of monocytes, antigen-specific proliferation of CART19 was significantly suppressed, which was reversed in the presence of TP-0903 (Fig.1F). To assess how Axl inhibition modulates myeloid cell-derived cytokines/chemokines, we performed Multiplex (Millipore-Sigma) with the supernatants obtained from these co-culture assays. The presence of monocytes resulted in a significant increase in IL-17a, IL-6, IL-1 receptor agonist, IL-1β, and soluble CD40 ligand. However, Axl-RTK inhibition resulted in selective reduction of those cytokines/chemokines (Fig.1G) while preserving other effector cytokines. Finally, we tested whether Axl-RTK inhibition with TP-0903 could overcome the negative effects of monocytes in vivo. Here, immunocompromised NSG mice were injected with 1x106 luciferase+ JeKo-1 cells intravenously. Ten days later, mice were injected with freshly isolated monocytes derived from a healthy donor. Two weeks after JeKo-1 inoculation, tumor burden was assessed with bioluminescence imaging. Mice were then randomized according to the tumor burden to receive 0.5x106 CART19 as a monotherapy or in combination with 20 mg/kg/day of oral TP-0903. The combination therapy resulted in superior anti-tumor effects and overall survival compared to CART19 monotherapy (Fig.1H-I). In summary, Axl-RTK inhibition with TP-0903 demonstrates a direct suppression of inhibitory monocytes, which in turn enhances CART cell function. Our findings support the strategy of further refining and testing the novel and potent combination of Axl-RTK inhibition and CART cell therapy for the treatment of B cell malignancies. Figure 1 Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Mouritsen:Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.: Current Employment. Foulks:Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Warner:Tolero Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Ding:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parikh:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kenderian:Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Lentigen: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cells are engineered with an artificial receptor which redirects T cells to recognize cancer cells expressing a particular surface antigen. CART cell therapy has been astonishingly successful at eradicating certain B cell malignancies, but relapse is common, and efficacy is lacking in many cancers. Gene editing of CART cells is being investigated to enhance efficacy and safety and to develop off-the-shelf products. Currently, genome engineering tools used to modify CART cells include zinc finger nucleases, transposons, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas9. CRISPR-Cas9 uses a trans-activating (tracrRNA): CRISPR RNA (crRNA) duplex to trigger imprecise DNA repair through targeted double stranded breaks, causing indels and often resulting in loss of protein function. Gene-edited CART cells have entered the clinic to provide an allogeneic cell source (TALEN TCRα knockout), safer treatment (CRISPR-Cas9 GM-CSF knockout), and resistance to exhaustion (CRISPR-Cas9 PD-1 knockout). CRISPR-Cas9 PD-1 knockout (PD-1k/o) CART cells were well-tolerated in a first-in-human clinical trial. However, clinically tested CRISPR-Cas9-edited CART cells showed only modest loss of function (~25%) of PD-1 upon infusion. Additionally, off-target editing has been observed in the clinic and remains a concern. We hypothesized that using next-generation CRISPR-Cas12a systems will result in enhanced editing efficiency and precision. CRISPR-Cas12a has a smaller protein component than CRISPR-Cas9, uses a single crRNA without a tracrRNA for simplified delivery and leaves staggered 5' overhangs. These properties, along with lower intrinsic off-target activity than Cas9, render Cas12a a powerful gene editing tool. First, we compared the knockout efficiency of Cas9 and Cas12a in three therapeutically relevant genetic targets in T cells by delivering ribonucleoprotein complexes containing the crRNA and Cas protein of interest. We showed that Cas12a more effectively knocked out CD3, GM-CSF, and PD-1 expression compared to Cas9 (Figure 1A), demonstrating the potential of Cas12a in further genetically editing T cell therapies. We then used electroporation with Cas9 and Cas12a to generate PD-1k/o in lentivirally transduced CD19-targeted CART (CART19) cells with the aim of making exhaustion-resistant CART19 cells through CRISPR gene editing. CART19 and PD-1k/o CART19 cells were repeatedly stimulated with CD19+ NALM6 target cells for one week, and exhaustion marker expression was measured over time with flow cytometry. The expression of CTLA4, TIM3, and LAG3 were similar between CART19 groups, but PD-1 expression was lower in Cas9 PD-1k/o CART19 cells and almost completely eradicated in Cas12a PD-1k/o CART19 cells compared to wildtype or mock shocked CART19 cells (Figure 1B). We then compared the functionality of wildtype, mock shocked, and Cas9 or Cas12a PD-1k/o CART19 cells in vitro to ensure that neither the electroporation process nor PD-1 knockout impaired CART19 cell antitumor activity. Over a range of effector-to-target ratios and with repeated stimulation with target cells, cytotoxicity was comparable across all CART19 cell groups (Figure 1C). All CART19 cell groups demonstrated robust proliferation in response to both nonspecific and antigen-specific stimulation and over one week of repeated antigen stimulation with NALM6 target cells (Figure 1D). We also confirmed that all CART19 cell groups demonstrated strong degranulation and cytokine production in response to nonspecific and antigen-specific stimulation, regardless of electroporation or PD-1 knockout (Figure 1E). In summary, our data demonstrate that Cas12a can be used as a gene editing tool to efficiently knock out therapeutically relevant genes in CART19 cell therapy. Additionally, Cas12a demonstrated improved knockout efficiency over Cas9 in three different genomic targets. PD-1 knockout via Cas9 or Cas12a reduced PD-1 expression on the CART19 cell surface, and PD-1 expression was almost completely ablated with Cas12a gene editing. Electroporation and PD-1 knockout did not impact the effector functions of the CART19 cells, including cytotoxicity, degranulation, cytokine secretion, or proliferation. In vivo studies assessing the antitumor efficacy and CART19 cell persistence are ongoing. Overall, Cas12a is a promising, efficient method of gene knockout to enhance the safety and efficacy of CART cells. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Kenderian:MorphoSys: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Lentigen: Research Funding.

Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy is highly effective and was FDA approved for certain B-cell malignancies, most patients relapse after CART infusion within the first 1-2 years due to inadequate CART expansion in vivo. Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has the ability to infect and lyse cancer cells. Clinical trials of VSV oncolytic therapy indicate that VSV efficiently infects cancer cells as well as innate immune cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that in patients who achieve suboptimal response to CART19, VSV engineered to express CD19 will augment anti-tumor activity through 1) direct lysis of cancer cells and 2) infecting cancer cells and innate immune cells with CD19 to further stimulate CART19. To test our hypothesis, human CD19 or GFP (control) was engineered between the glycoprotein and large-protein (Fig.1A) in a modified VSV backbone. A matrix inactivating mutation (M51R) rendered it incapable of suppressing anti-viral reactions of infected targets, potentially promoting its immunogenicity. First, we tested the anti-tumor activity of VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP against the luciferase (luc)+CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line NALM6 and the luc+CD19- acute myeloid leukemia cell line MOLM13. VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP successfully lysed NALM6 (Fig.1B) or MOLM13, both in vitro and in vivo (data not shown). Next, we investigated the efficiency of VSV-CD19 in infecting tumor and immune cells. 24 hours after exposure to VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP, we analyzed the surface expression of CD19 on MOLM13 and revealed efficient CD19 delivery (Fig.1C). Next, we assessed VSV infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors (HDs). Freshly isolated HD PBMCs were infected with VSV-CD19 for 6 hours and subsequently assessed for CD19 expression. Consistent with findings from clinical trials, VSV-CD19 selectively infected and induced CD19 expression on monocytes while other cells were not affected (Fig.1D). To exclude potential toxicities against CART19, we co-cultured CART19 with VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP using second-generation 4-1BB costimulated CART19. Both VSV-CD19 and VSV-GFP did not infect CART19 as evident by preservation of CART19 viability and lack of CD19 or GFP expression (Fig.1E). Having demonstrated that VSV-CD19 specifically delivered CD19 to monocytes, we next tested whether the infected monocytes stimulated CART19. VSV-CD19 infected monocytes induced potent antigen-specific proliferation of CART19 (Fig.1F) and resulted in enhanced anti-tumor activity against luc+NALM6 in vitro (Fig.1G). Next, we aimed to confirm these findings in vivo. We generated luc+CART19 to track CART19 expansion in vivo. Freshly isolated HD monocytes were infected with VSV-CD19 ex vivo. After 4 hours, VSV-CD19 was washed away and immunocompromised NSG mice were intravenously injected with VSV-CD19 infectedmonocytes. After 24 hours, 3.5x106 of luc+untransduced T cells (UTD) or luc+CART19 were injected intravenously. The T cell expansion was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI). VSV-CD19 infected monocytes specifically stimulated and expanded CART19 (Fig.1H). Finally, we tested whether VSV-CD19 can stimulate and rescue suboptimal anti-tumor effects of CART19 in vivo using a NALM6 relapsed model. Here, 1x106 luc+NALM6 were injected intravenously into NSG mice on day -6. At day -1, mice were imaged and randomized according to tumor burden to receive 1x106 UTD or CART19 on day 0. Subsequently, at day 4, mice were re-imaged and randomized. At day 5, HD monocytes were injected intravenously. Three hours after administering monocytes, mice received 1x107 VSV-CD19 or VSV-GFP (Fig.1I). BLI revealed that CART19 plusVSV-CD19 showed better tumor control than CART19 monotherapy or CART19 plus VSV-GFP (Fig.1J-K). Furthermore, CART19 plus VSV-CD19 exhibited long-term survival (Fig.1L). In summary, VSV-CD19 not only demonstrated direct anti-tumor effects but also specifically delivered CD19 to monocytes and tumor cells, thereby re-stimulating and enhancing the anti-tumor activity of CART19. This work provides a rationale to study VSV-CD19 in patients who demonstrate only suboptimal response to CART19. This approach could also be applied to augment CART therapy in other tumors. Figure 1 Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Eckert:Genentech: Current Employment. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding. Peng:Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. Russell:Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. Kenderian:Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding.

Introduction Despite the success of chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy, it is limited by lower rates of durable responses related to inadequate CART cell expansion and trafficking and life-threatening complications such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Development of a strategy to efficiently track CART cells would allow the in vivo characterization of T cell expansion and trafficking to tumor sites as well as the development of strategies to potentially overcome these limitations. The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) is a sensitive reporter system that has been used for cell imaging in the clinic. Objectives NIS would be an efficient way to assess CART cell expansion, trafficking, and toxicity. Methods In vitro functions of CART cells were assessed by antigen specific proliferation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine production. NIS activity in vitro was evaluated by 125I uptake assay. In vivo imaging was performed using TFB PET/CT. CART cell trafficking assay was tested with OPM2 multiple myeloma (MM) xenografts and treated with either BCMA CART or NIS+BCMA CART cells. For CRS model, NSG mice were engrafted with patient-derived CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia blasts. After the engraftment, mice were treated with either NIS+CART19 cells (5 × 106) or control. Results We generated NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA CART cells through dual transduction (Fig A) and revealed the exclusive 125I uptake in vitro (Fig B). In vitro functions of NIS+CART cells were equivalent to CART19 (Fig C). This indicates the incorporation of NIS into CART cells does not impair their antitumor activity. In vivo sensitivity assay revealed NIS+CART cells were detectable when cells were subcutaneously injected to NSG mice at a dose of 1.25 × 106 cells (Fig D). For in vivo trafficking assay, bioluminescence imaging (BLI) showed MM cells mainly engrafted in bones (Fig E). TFB PET confirmed the trafficking of NIS+BCMA CART cells to the bones, corresponding to BLI (Fig E). Both BCMA CART and NIS+BCMA CART cells exhibited similar antitumor activity. Finally, we explored whether TFB PET can detect CART massive expansion in vivo and predict CRS. One week after mice were treated with high dose NIS+CART19 cells, mice developed muscle weakness, hunched bodies, and weight loss (Fig F), which correlate with CRS. TFB PET revealed a significant uptake in the bone marrow, spleen, liver, and lungs (Fig G) of the diseased mice but not control mice. Flow cytometry revealed extensive infiltration of CART cells in the liver and spleen. This demonstrates the ability of TFB PET to detect NIS+CART cell expansion in vivo, correlating with the development of CRS. Conclusion Our results robustly show NIS+CART cells provides a sensitive, clinically applicable platform to image CART cells and to assess their expansion, trafficking to tumor sites, and the development of CRS. These studies illuminate a novel way to noninvasively assess CART cell functions in vivo.

Introduction Despite the remarkable activity of CD19 directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy in the treatment of B cell malignancies, limitations include neurotoxicity (NT) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Emerging literature suggests that inhibitory myeloid cells and their cytokines induce CAR-T cell toxicities and inhibit effector functions. GM-CSF was specifically identified as a critical cytokine in the development of NT and CRS. Neutralization of GM-CSF in preclinical models has been shown to prevent CRS, enhance CART anti-tumor activity, and reduce the presence of tumor associated macrophages. In addition, there appears to be a direct effect on CART19 cells. Objectives In this study, we aimed to evaluate the direct effect of GM-CSF on CART cells. Methods We used a guide RNA (gRNA) targeting exon 3 of GM-CSF in a CRISPR-Cas9 lentiviral vector to knock out GM-CSF during CART cell manufacturing. Edited and wildtype T cells and CART cells were sent for whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing. We also used flow cytometry to assess the expression of GM-CSF receptors on CART cells, activated using CD3/CD28 beads or irradiated NALM6 cells. Results WES analysis revealed no significant difference in the single nucleotide variants or indel counts between GM-CSFk/o and GM-CSFwt CART19 (Fig 1A). WES was significant for only two alterations in the gene targeted by the gRNA (Fig 1B). This high efficiency and accuracy indicated that the improvement in CART function is unlikely related to an off-target effect of the gRNA and suggests a direct interaction between GM-CSF and CART cells as a potential mechanism behind the improved anti-tumor activity. Further investigation robustly indicates that while resting CART cells do not express any GM-CSF receptors, activated CART cells significantly upregulate both α and β subunits of the GM-CSF receptor. This finding was significant both when CART cells were activated through their T cell receptor (Fig 1C) or CAR (Fig 1D). This was also seen in GM-CSFk/o CART19 cells, indicating this is specifically induced by T cell stimulation. These data suggest a direct interaction between GM-CSF and upregulated GM-CSFR on activated CART cells. Finally, we sought to uncover the downstream changes resulting from this effect. Transcriptome interrogation of GM-CSFk/o CART19 revealed a distinct signature, including significant inhibition of the Fas death pathway (Fig 1E). This suggests a potential mechanism for enhanced CART19 activity following GM-CSF depletion. Conclusion Our results strongly indicate that CART cells increase expression of GM-CSF receptor subunits when activated, resulting in modulation of CART cell functions. Furthermore, GM-CSFk/o CART19 revealed a distinct transcriptome signature compared to GM-CSFwt CART19. These results illuminate a novel mechanism for a direct modulatory effect of GM-CSF on activated CART cells.

BACKGROUND Efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy remains limited in solid tumors. Given the heterogeneity of surface receptor expression and immunosuppressive stromal microenvironment, strategies to target tumor neovasculature and tumor stromal cells are needed to help overcome CART inhibition by GBM. Eph receptors are the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinases and are integral to cell adhesion, migration, and axon guidance, during development and homeostasis. EphA3 is a receptor tyrosine kinase which is lowly expressed in adult tissues but is highly expressed in tumor neovasculature and tumor stromal cells in GBM and other solid tumors. EphA3 is over-expressed in up to 40% of GBM samples. We aimed to develop CART cells directed against EphA3 to use in targeting tumor neovasculature and tumor stromal cells in GBM. METHODS we developed a second generation CD28 co-stimulated CAR construct in a third generation lentivirus backbone to generate EphA3 CART cells using the single chain variable fragment of ifabotuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against EphA3. Patient derived GBM xenograft cell lines were used in these experiments. RESULTS EphA3 directed CART cells exhibited specific and potent antitumor activity against EphA3+ GBM cell lines with variable transcriptome EphA3 expression indicating its broader applicability in patients with GBM. Killing over 24-hour incubation was significant at low effector: target ratio: 52.5% killing at 1.25:1 against cell lines with 25.05% EphA3 expression and 37.1% killing at 1.25:1and 90% killing at 5:1 ratio against a cell line with 19.28% expression. Conversely, when co-cultured with UTD controls there was significantly lower killing, or growth of tumor cells. CONCLUSION We demonstrate for the first time that targeting EphA3 with CART cells is feasible, efficacious and represents a novel therapeutics strategy to target GBM. Data from in vivo and combinatorial CART experiments will be reported at the meeting.

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a cutting edge and potentially revolutionary new treatment option for cancer. However, there are significant limitations to its widespread use in the treatment of cancer. These limitations include the development of unique toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (NT) and limited expansion, effector functions, and anti-tumor activity in solid tumors. One strategy to enhance CAR-T efficacy and/or control toxicities of CAR-T cells is to edit the genome of the CAR-T cells themselves during CAR-T cell manufacturing. Here, we describe the use of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in CAR-T cells via transduction with a lentiviral construct containing a guide RNA to granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and Cas9. As an example, we describe CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of GM-CSF. We have shown that these GM-CSFk/o CAR-T cells effectively produce less GM-CSF while maintaining critical T cell function and result in enhanced anti-tumor activity in vivo compared to wild type CAR-T cells.

Although Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP), a life-threatening infection, has been reported in patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (BNHL) who were treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapies (R-CTX), the PCP prophylaxis regimen awaits establishment to date. This study reports a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of a low-dose trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) in patients with BNHL receiving R-CTX. We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients newly diagnosed with BNHL who received R-CTX at our institute from 2010 to 2015. We collected patients' clinical and laboratory data, including lymphocytes count, IgG level, PCP prophylaxis regimens, and adverse events (AEs). Patients were categorized into the following two groups based on the TMP/SMX regimen: group A (33 patients; 80 mg/400 mg×3/week) or group B (65 patients; 160 mg/800 mg×2/week). Both lymphocytes count and IgG level declined during R-CTX. No patient developed PCP. Patients in group B exhibited a significantly higher incidence of AEs (18.2% vs. 63.1%; p0.05) and increased AST (6.1% vs. 26.6%; p0.05), compared with those in group A. Thus, TMP/SMX (80 mg/400 mg×3/week) effectively prevents PCP and is preferable because of the lower rates of AEs.

Diarrhea after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be life-threatening, and its etiology includes conditioning regimens, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), infections, and transplantation-associated microangiopathy (iTAM). Cord colitis syndrome (CCS) has been described as a syndrome of culture-negative and antibiotic-responsive persistent watery and non-bloody diarrhea of uncertain pathogenesis and occurs in umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) recipients. We encountered a case similar to CCS that developed severe watery diarrhea after UCBT without any signs of GVHD or infection and responded well to metronidazole (MNZ) treatment. Since CCS is very rare, we herein describe a case of MNZ-effective diarrhea after UCBT.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) binds to programmed death-1 (PD-1) on activated T cells and contributes to T-cell exhaustion. PD-L1 expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) could be thought to inhibit the induction of Ag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) by transducing negative signal into T cells; however, the roles of PD-L1 on APCs have not yet been well examined. Therefore, we evaluated the roles of PD-L1 on APCs in the induction of Ag-specific CTLs. CD3 T cells isolated from cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive healthy donors were stimulated with mature dendritic cells pulsed with CMV pp65-derived HLA-restricted peptides in the presence of anti-PD-L1 blocking antibody. Unexpectedly, PD-L1 blockade resulted in a less efficient induction of CMV-specific CTLs, suggesting that PD-L1 play a positive role in the induction of Ag-specific CTLs. For further evaluations and application to adoptive immunotherapy, we generated K562-based artificial APCs, which were retrovirally transduced with HLA class I molecules and various combinations of CD80/86 and PD-L1. K562/HLA+CD80/86+PD-L1 cells produced significantly higher induction of CMV-specific CTLs than K562/HLA or K562/HLA+CD80/86 cells without causing excessive differentiation or functional exhaustion of the induced CTLs, whereas PD-L1 itself did not have a stimulatory effect. Furthermore, only K562/HLA+CD80/86+PD-L1 cells pulsed with HLA-A*24:02-restricted Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) peptide clearly expanded WT1-specific CTLs from healthy donors. Our findings presumed that PD-L1 expressed on APCs along with CD80/86 enhanced the induction of Ag-specific CTLs probably depending on fine-tuning excessive stimulation of CD80/86, and that K562/HLA+CD80/86+PD-L1 cells has therapeutic potential as a novel type of artificial APCs for adoptive immunotherapy.

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is a major life-threatening problem encountered by patients with hematological malignancies receiving intensive chemotherapy. Empirical antifungal agents are therefore important. Despite the availability of antifungal agents for such situations, the optimal agents and administration methods remain unclear. We conducted a prospective phase 2 study of empirical 1 mg/kg/day liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) in 80 patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for hematological malignancies. All enrolled patients were high-risk and had recurrent prolonged febrile neutropenia despite having received broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy for at least 72 hours. Fifty-three patients (66.3 %) achieved the primary endpoint of successful treatment, thus exceeding the predefined threshold success rate. No patients developed IFI. The treatment completion rate was 73.8 %, and only two cases ceased treatment because of adverse events. The most frequent events were reversible electrolyte abnormalities. We consider low-dose L-AMB to provide comparable efficacy and improved safety and cost-effectiveness when compared with other empirical antifungal therapies. Additional large-scale randomized studies are needed to determine the clinical usefulness of L-AMB relative to other empirical antifungal therapies.

T cells genetically modified with a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CD19CAR) are remarkably effective against B-cell malignancies in clinical trials. However, major concerns remain regarding toxicities, such as hypogammaglobulinemia, due to B-cell aplasia or severe cytokine release syndrome after overactivation of CAR T cells. To resolve these adverse events, we aimed to develop an inducible CAR system by using a tetracycline regulation system that would be activated only in the presence of doxycycline (Dox). In this study, the second-generation CD19CAR was fused into the third-generation Tet-On vector (Tet-CD19CAR) and was retrovirally transduced into primary CD8+ T cells. Tet-CD19CAR T cells were successfully generated and had minimal background CD19CAR expression without Dox. Tet-CD19CAR T cells in the presence of Dox were equivalently cytotoxic against CD19+ cell lines and had equivalent cytokine production and proliferation upon CD19 stimulation, compared with conventional CD19CAR T cells. The Dox(+) Tet-CD19CAR T cells also had significant antitumor activity in a xenograft model. However, without Dox, Tet-CD19CAR T cells lost CAR expression and CAR T-cell functions in vitro and in vivo, clearly segregating the “On” and “Off” status of Tet-CD19CAR cells by Dox administration. In addition to suicide-gene technology, controlling the expression and the functions of CAR with an inducible vector is a potential solution for CAR T-cell therapy–related toxicities, and may improve the safety profile of CAR T-cell therapy. This strategy might also open the way to treat other malignancies in combination with other CAR or TCR gene–modified T cells. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(8); 658–68. ©2016 AACR. See related Spotlight by June, p. 643.

BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for hematological malignancies, its efficacy remains limited in solid tumors. EGFRvIII is a truncated version of the wild type EGFR in which deletion of exons 2–7 of the extracellular domain leads the variant (EGFRvIII) that is strongly antigenic and is mostly expressed on tumor cells. EGFR amplification (tEGFR) almost uniformly precedes the presence of EGFRvIII on tumor cells. The heterogeneity of surface receptor expression and immunosuppressive stromal microenvironment underscore the need to develop CART strategies to target multiple tumor antigens simultaneously. METHODS we generated tEGFR/EGFRvIII directed CAR construct by cloning a clinically relevant tEGFR and EGFRvIII specific scFv into a second generation CAR construct (41BB stimulated) in a third generation lentivirus backbone. This was used to transfect 293T cells and the generated lentivirus particles were used to transduce T cells and generate EGFRvIII/tEGFR CART cells. GBM primary patient derived cell lines were used in these experiments. These cells were passaged and maintained in patient derived xenograft models. RESULTS EGFRvIII/tEGFR directed CART cells exhibited potent antitumor activity against EGFRvIII/tEGFR + GBM cell lines: with 100% killing at 1.25:1, 2.5:1, 5:1 and 10:1 E:T ratio on multiple PDX cell lines with EGFRvIII expression and EGFR over-expression (greater than five copies of EGFR gene) at 24 hours of incubation. Conclusion: We demonstrate that targeting EGFRvIII and over-expressed EGFR with CART cells is feasible, efficacious and represents a promising therapeutic strategy to target GMB. Data from in vivo and combinatorial CART experiments will be reported at the meeting.

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a new pillar in cancer therapeutics; however, its application is limited by the associated toxicities. These include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Although the IL-6R antagonist tocilizumab is approved for treatment of CRS, there is no approved treatment of neurotoxicity associated with CD19-targeted CAR-T (CART19) cell therapy. Recent data suggest that monocytes and macrophages contribute to the development of CRS and neurotoxicity after CAR-T cell therapy. Therefore, we investigated neutralizing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as a potential strategy to manage CART19 cell–associated toxicities. In this study, we show that GM-CSF neutralization with lenzilumab does not inhibit CART19 cell function in vitro or in vivo. Moreover, CART19 cell proliferation was enhanced and durable control of leukemic disease was maintained better in patient-derived xenografts after GM-CSF neutralization with lenzilumab. In a patient acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenograft model of CRS and neuroinflammation (NI), GM-CSF neutralization resulted in a reduction of myeloid and T cell infiltration in the central nervous system and a significant reduction in NI and prevention of CRS. Finally, we generated GM-CSF–deficient CART19 cells through CRISPR/Cas9 disruption of GM-CSF during CAR-T cell manufacturing. These GM-CSFk/o CAR-T cells maintained normal functions and had enhanced antitumor activity in vivo, as well as improved overall survival, compared with CART19 cells. Together, these studies illuminate a novel approach to abrogate NI and CRS through GM-CSF neutralization, which may potentially enhance CAR-T cell function. Phase 2 studies with lenzilumab in combination with CART19 cell therapy are planned.