Search

Oesophageal cancer is among the ten most common types of cancer worldwide. More than 80% of the cases and deaths related to the disease occur in developing countries. Local socio-economic, epidemiologic and healthcare particularities led us to create a Brazilian guideline for the management of oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) carcinomas. The Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours invited 50 physicians with different backgrounds, including radiology, pathology, endoscopy, nuclear medicine, genetics, oncological surgery, radiotherapy and clinical oncology, to collaborate. This document was prepared based on an extensive review of topics related to heredity, diagnosis, staging, pathology, endoscopy, surgery, radiation, systemic therapy (including checkpoint inhibitors) and follow-up, which was followed by presentation, discussion and voting by the panel members. It provides updated evidence-based recommendations to guide clinical management of oesophageal and OGJ carcinomas in several scenarios and clinical settings.

Purpose As of 2020, the world is facing the great challenge of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. While the overall mortality is low, the virus is highly virulent and may infect millions of people worldwide. This will consequently burden health systems, particularly by those individuals considered to be at high risk of severe complications from COVID-19. Such risk factors include advanced age, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, diabetes and cancer. However, few data on the outcomes of cancer patients infected by SARS CoV-2 exist. Therefore, there is a lack of guidance on how to manage cancer patients during the pandemic. We sought to propose specific recommendations about the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Methods The Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumours Group board of directors and members sought up-to-date scientific literature on each tumour type and discussed all recommendations by virtual meetings to provide evidence-based-and sometimes, expert opinion-recommendation statements. Our objectives were to recommend evidence-based approaches to both treat and minimise the risk of COVID-19 for cancer patients, and simultaneously propose how to decrease the use of hospital resources at a time these resources need to be available to treat COVID-19 patients. Results Overall and tumour-specific recommendations were made by stage (including surgical, locoregional, radiotherapy, systemic treatments and follow-up strategies) for the most common gastrointestinal malignancies: esophagus, gastric, pancreas, bile duct, hepatocellular, colorectal, anal cancer and neuroendocrine tumours. Conclusions Our recommendations emphasise the importance of treating cancer patients, using the best evidence available, while simultaneously taking into consideration the world-wide health resource hyperutilisation to treat non-cancer COVID-19 patients.

The Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumor Group developed guidelines for the surgical and clinical management of patients with billiary cancers. The multidisciplinary panel was composed of experts in the field of radiology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiotherapy, endoscopy and pathology. The panel utilized the most recent literature to develop a series of evidence-based recommendations on different treatment and diagnostic strategies for cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder cancers. RESUMO O Grupo Brasileiro de Tumores Gastrointestinais desenvolveu diretrizes de tratamento cirúrgico e clínico de pacientes com tumores de vias biliares. O painel multidisciplinar foi composto de especialistas nas áreas radiologia, oncologia, cirurgia, radioterapia, endoscopia e anatomia patológica. O painel utilizou literatura atual para desenvolver recomendações baseadas em evidência científica para as diferentes estratégias terapêuticas e diagnósticas dos colangiocarcinomas e tumores de vesícula biliar.

OBJECTIVE: We and others have previously suggested that pretreatment levels of CA 19-9 correlate with overall survival (OS) among patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. We sought to confirm the prognostic role of the pretreatment level of CA 19-9 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 50 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated in the first-line with single-agent gemcitabine or combinations. Patients could also have received second-line treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS were compared with the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was done using the Cox model. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were female with a mean age of 64.3 years, and 82% were metastatic upon diagnosis. The median OS for the entire sample was 11 months, and the median CA 19-9 level was 542 U/mL. Significant predictors of OS in univariate analyses were the first-line use of combined chemotherapy (p=0.006) and use of erlotinib in any line (p=0.002), with borderline significance for pretreatment levels of CA 19-9 (p=0.052). In multivariate analysis, only use of erlotinib (p=0.003) and pretreatment CA 19-9 level (p=0.026) were significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSION: Our study lends further support to use of the pre-chemotherapy level of CA 19-9 as a prognostic indicator in clinical practice and as a stratification factor in clinical trials. The association between erlotinib use and OS may have been biased by patient selection, notwithstanding the positive results from a previous randomized trial. OBJETIVO: Estudos anteriores pelo nosso grupo e por outros autores sugerem que o nível pré-tratamento do marcador tumoral CA 19-9 se correlaciona com a sobrevida global (SG) em pacientes com câncer de pâncreas avançado tratados com gencitabina. Nosso objetivo foi o de confirmar o papel prognóstico do nível pré-tratamento do CA 19-9 em pacientes com câncer de pâncreas avançado tratados com regimes variados de quimioterapia. MÉTODOS: Identificamos retrospectivamente 50 pacientes com câncer de pâncreas localmente avançado ou metastático tratados em primeira linha com gencitabina ou combinações contendo esse agente. Os pacientes poderiam ter recebido ainda tratamento em segunda linha com outros agentes. As estimativas de SG pelo método de Kaplan-Meier foram comparadas pelo teste log-rank, e a análise multivariada foi feita usando-se o modelo de Cox. RESULTADOS: Vinte e sete pacientes eram do sexo feminino, a idade média foi de 64,3 anos, e 82% tinham doença metastática ao diagnóstico. A mediana de SG para a amostra como um todo foi de 11 meses, e o nível mediano de CA 19-9 foi de 542 U/mL. Fatores preditivos de SG em análises univariadas foram o uso de quimioterapia combinada em primeira linha (p=0,006) e o uso de erlotinibe (p=0,002), com nível de significância limítrofe para nível pré-tratamento de CA 19-9 (p=0,052). Na análise multivariada, apenas o uso de erlotinibe (p=0,003) e o nível pré-tratamento de CA 19-9 (p=0,026) estiveram associados com SG de maneira significativa. CONCLUSÃO: Nosso estudo fornece evidência adicional para o uso do nível pré-tratamento de CA 19-9 como indicador prognóstico e como fator de estratificação em ensaios clínicos. A associação entre uso de erlotinibe e SG pode ter sido devida à seleção de pacientes, não obstante o resultado de um estudo randomizado recente mostrando o benefício desse tratamento.

Objective: To report the demographic data and clinical outcomes of non-small-cell lung cancer patients exposed to erlotinib in any line of treatment. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients from a reference general hospital and a private oncology clinic, who received erlotinib from 2005 to 2011. Statistical analysis was performed and we evaluated demographic data and response to treatment, by correlating the results of this first cohort published in Brazil with results of current literature. Results: A total of 44 patients were included; 65.9% were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, and 63.6% had metastatic disease. The mean age was 63.3 years. The median follow-up was 47.9 months. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation screening was performed in 22.7% of patients (n=10), with mutation present in 30% of patients. The median overall survival was 46.3 months, and there was a higher probability of survival at 60 months for females compared to males (29.4% versus 15.8%; p=0.042). The other variables did not present significant statistical difference. Conclusion: We collected the largest cohort of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who have used erlotinib in Brazil to date, and demonstrated that outcomes of patients treated at our clinic during the study period were consistent with the results of current literature in similar patients. RESUMO Objetivo: Relatar as características demográficas e a evolução de pacientes com neoplasia de pulmão de não pequenas células que receberam erlotinibe em qualquer linha de tratamento. Métodos: Coletamos retrospectivamente dados de pacientes portadores de neoplasia de pulmão de não pequenas células que receberam erlotinibe em qualquer linha de tratamento em um hospital geral de referência e em uma clínica particular de oncologia em São Paulo, no período de 2005 a 2011. Foi realizada a análise estatística e foram avaliados aspectos demográficos e resposta ao tratamento estabelecido, correlacionando os resultados dessa primeira coorte publicada no Brasil com resultados da literatura vigente. Resultados: Foram avaliados 44 pacientes, dos quais 65,9% eram portadores de adenocarcinoma e 63,6% tinham doença metastática. A média de idade foi de 63,3 anos. O seguimento mediano foi de 47,9 meses. A pesquisa de mutação do receptor do fator de crescimento epidérmico foi realizada em 22,7% dos pacientes (n=10), resultando positiva em 30% dos avaliados. A sobrevida global mediana foi de 46,3 meses, e observou-se uma probabilidade maior de sobrevida em 60 meses para o grupo feminino, quando comparado ao grupo masculino (29,4% versus 15,8%; p=0,042). As demais variáveis não apresentaram diferença estatística significativa. Conclusão: Coletamos a maior sequência de pacientes com neoplasia de pulmão de não pequenas células que fizeram uso de erlotinibe no Brasil até a data vigente e demonstramos que a evolução dos pacientes tratados no período avaliado teve resultados concordantes com os da literatura vigente em pacientes semelhantes.

Juntamente com a avaliação da eficácia de um determinado tratamento, a avaliação dos efeitos adversos conseqüentes a este tratamento representa um aspecto importante da análise do resultado terapêutico. O estudo quantitativo e qualitativo da toxicidade do tratamento do câncer, de forma padronizada, auxilia na comparação entre os diversos tratamentos disponíveis, permitindo ainda a uniformização da linguagem utilizada. Com o intuito de uniformizar a graduação dos efeitos adversos do tratamento do câncer por parte dos pesquisadores brasileiros, decidimos proceder a uma tradução da tabela dos Critérios Comuns de Toxicidade. Esperamos, com isso, contribuir para o aprimoramento contínuo dos profissionais brasileiros envolvidos em pesquisa clínica nas diversas disciplinas oncológicas, contando com o fato de que a versão traduzida desses critérios possa ser acessível a um maior número de pesquisadores, nem todos fluentes no idioma inglês. Acreditamos, fundamentalmente, que os pacientes brasileiros poderão beneficiar-se do incremento nas atividades de pesquisa clínica desenvolvidas em nosso país e que nossos pesquisadores podem contribuir de forma significativa para o avanço contínuo do conhecimento neste importante aspecto da medicina que é a luta contra o câncer.

Colorectal cancer is currently a public health priority because it is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Western countries. Combination regimes of oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin or capecitabine have emerged as important options in the palliative and adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. Although better tolerated than cisplatin, oxaliplatin displays a characteristic profile of adverse events whose recognition and management are essential for physicians who treat patients with colorectal cancer and other malignancies that benefit from the use of oxaliplatin. Peripheral neuropathy is probably the most frequent and clinically relevant adverse event associated with the use of oxaliplatin, and several measures have been proposed to mitigate this toxicity. Temporary interruption of oxaliplatin before limiting neurotoxicity develops during therapy is a potential approach to avoid the problem of oxaliplatin-associated neuropathy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Calcium and magnesium infusions have no effect on chemotherapy efficacy and also constitute a useful approach in clinical practice. Finally, the incidence and severity of chronic peripheral neuropathy in patients treated with oxaliplatin may be reduced by the use of neuroprotective agents, for example, venlafaxine. Other adverse events, such as gastrointestinal and liver toxicity, thrombocytopenia, and hypersensitivity reactions, are also reviewed in this article, and suggestions are made for their management.

Background. Serum levels of CA 19-9 correlate with survival among patients with pancreatic cancer treated with surgery or radiation therapy. In addition, CA 19-9 responses have been shown to predict for a better prognosis among patients with advanced disease treated with chemotherapy. The present study evaluates the predictive role of CA 19-9 pretreatment levels and response among patients treated with gemcitabine. Methods. We retrospectively identified 28 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and baseline elevations of CA 19-9 (>37 U/mL) who were treated with single agent gemcitabine. CA 19-9 response was defined as a ≥50% decline at any time after treatment. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and curves were compared with the log-rank test. Results. Eleven patients (39%) had a CA 19-9 response. The median survival of responding patients was longer than that of non-responding patients (13.8 vs 8 mo, p=.0272). When pretreatment CA 19-9 levels were analyzed, patients who had CA 19-9 below the median for the entire sample (1212 U/mL) lived significantly longer than patients with a CA 19-9 above the median (14.9 vs 7.4 mo, p=.0013). On multivariable analysis, pretreatment CA 19-9 level was an independent, and stronger predictor of survival (p=.0005) than CA 19-9 response (p=.0497). Other variables were not associated with survival. Conclusions. CA 19-9 may be a useful adjunct to response evaluation is this setting. In addition to CA 19-9 responses, prechemotherapy levels of this marker seem to have strong prognostic significance.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy (leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil) on the treatment of potentially resectable low rectal cancer using the following end points: 1) toxicity of this combined modality regimen; 2) clinical and pathologic response rate and local control; 3) downstaging of the tumor and its influence on the number of sphincter-saving operations; 4) disease-free interval, patterns of relapse, and overall survival. METHODS: From 1991 to 1996, 118 patients with potentially resectable cases of histologically proven adenocarcinoma and no distant metastases were enrolled into this protocol. All patients were evaluated by clinical and proctologic examination, abdominal computed tomography, transrectal ultrasound, and chest radiography. Therapy consisted of 5,040 cGy (6 weeks) and concurrent leucovorin (20/mg/m2/day) with bolus doses of 5-fluorouracil administered intravenously at 425 mg/m2/day for three consecutive days on the first and last three days of radiation therapy. After two months, all patients underwent repeat evaluation and biopsy of any suspected residual lesions or scar tissue. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 36 months. Toxicity of chemotherapy regimen was minimum. Thirty-six patients (30.5 percent) were classified as being complete responders. In six of these patients, complete response was confirmed by the absence of tumor in the surgical specimens (3 abdominoperineal resections and 3 proctosigmoidectomies with coloanal anastomosis). In the remaining 30 patients, confirmation of a complete response was made by the absence of symptoms, negative findings on physical examination, and biopsy, transrectal ultrasound, and pelvic computed tomographic test results during follow-up. Eighty-two patients (69.4 percent) were considered incomplete responders. Residual lesions had already been identified during the first examination in 74 patients. In the other eight patients, residual tumor was only identified after 3 to 14 months. All patients underwent surgical treatment, except one patient who refused surgery. Eighty-seven patients underwent 90 surgical procedures: local excision, 9; coloanal anastomosis, 36; abdominoperineal resection, 4; Hartmann's procedure, 1. Isolated local recurrences occurred in five patients (4.3 percent) and combined local and distant failure in eight patients (6.7 percent). Ninety patients are alive and disease-free at a median follow-up of 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Combined up-front chemoradiotherapy was associated with tolerable and acceptable side effects. A significant number of patients had complete disappearance of their tumors (30.5 percent) within a median follow-up of 36 months. This regimen spared 26.2 percent of patients from surgical treatment and allowed sphincter-saving management in 38.1 percent of patients who may have required abdominoperineal resection. Preliminary results of this trial suggests a reduction in the number of local recurrences and reinforces the concept that infiltrative low rectal cancer may be initially treated by chemoradiotherapy.

Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome is a rare complication of strongyloidiasis that occurs in immunosuppressed patients. It is caused by increasing autoinfection of the host by the nematode, leading to serious superimposed enterobacterial sepsis. Once established, it has a high fatality rate. Two cases are reported of Strongyloides hyperinfection in patients with lymphoma who presented with purulent meningitis. Both were receiving combination chemotherapy that included high-dose corticosteroids, and neither was granulocytopenic at infectious onset. The patients had respiratory insufficiency that required mechanical ventilation and serious septic episodes. Both were treated with thiabendazole, and one survived with clearance of the larvae. These cases illustrate the possibility of strongyloidiasis hyperinfection as an underlying diagnosis of purulent meningitis and serious septic episodes in lymphomatous patients. It may occur even without granulocytopenia.

The efficacy and toxicity of a combination of etoposide (100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 3), Adriamycin (20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8) and cisplatinum (40 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 and 8) repeated every 4 weeks as an outpatient regimen were assessed in 29 consecutive patients with metastatic gastric cancer with measurable disease. Five of these patients were refractory to 5-Fluorouracil, Adriamycin, and Mitomycin C. Three of these previously treated patients responded to the etoposide. Adriamycin, cisplatinum (VAP) therapy. An overall objective response rate of 72.5% was achieved, including 14% that were complete responses. The median duration of response was 6.0 months; median overall survival was 7.2 months, overall one-year survival was 34.4%. Hematologic toxicity was intense, particularly among patients with lower performance status. Three patients died as a consequence of nadir sepsis episodes.

Thirty consecutive patients with epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal larger than 2 cm were treated with the concomitant application of radiation and two cycles of chemotherapy (5FU and mitomycin-C) between January 1982 and January 1988. Twenty-eight patients were treated with curative intention and two for palliation only. All patients were reexamined after a period of one to 2 months, under light general anesthesia, and any residual tumor or scar tissue was biopsied. Control biopsy was positive in eight patients. Three of six patients who had abdominoperineal excision died from locoregional recurrence; the remaining are alive and cancer free after 1 to 4 years. Two patients had local excision; one is alive and the other died of other cancer metastasis four years later. Seventeen patients who had negative biopsies are alive and free of disease after 1 to 5 years; two died of unrelated causes, two died with distant metastasis (present prior to treatment), and one died with locoregional recurrence. Locoregional failures occurred in four patients (13.3 percent) in the entire series. Individualization of each patient, adjustment of doses, and carefully executed radiation and chemotherapy are the most important points for the success of treatment.