Search

BACKGROUND Bone conduction implants based on abutment-driven acoustic transmission result in good hearing outcomes; however, skin complications impact the quality of life (QOL) and possibly the viability of the device for many patients. The transcutaneous magnetic Baha® Attract technology was developed with the goal of minimising skin complications. OBJECTIVES To analyse surgical, auditory and QOL outcomes for patients implanted with the Baha® Attract. DESIGN Prospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING Four French tertiary referral centres. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-two patients implanted with the Baha® Attract, including 25 with conductive and mixed hearing loss and 7 with single-sided deafness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postoperative follow-up involved the visual analysis of soft tissue adaptation and sound processor magnet strength measurement. The audiometric outcomes were evaluated in quiet and noise, and the QOL was assessed using three different questionnaires. RESULTS After 12 months of use, soft tissue was thinner, and mean magnet strength was significantly decreased (3.7-3.1, P

The main objective was to evaluate the bimodal self-rated benefits on auditory performance under real conditions and the quality of life in two groups of cochlear-implanted adults, with or without a contralateral hearing aid. The secondary objective was to investigate correlations between the use of a hearing aid and residual hearing on the non-implanted ear. This retrospective study was realized between 2000 and 2010 in two referral centers. A population of 183 postlingually deaf adults, implanted with a cochlear experience superior to 6 months, was selected. The Speech, Spatial, and other Qualities of Hearing Scale were administered to evaluate the auditory performances, and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life. The population was divided into two groups: a group with unilateral cochlear implants (Cochlear Implant-alone, n = 54), and a bimodal group with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (n = 62). Both groups were similar in terms of auditory deprivation duration, duration of cochlear implant use, and pure-tone average on the implanted ear. There was a significant difference in terms of pure-tone average on low and low-to-mid frequencies on the non-implanted ear. The scores on both questionnaires showed an improvement in the basic sound perception and quality of social activities for the bimodal group. The results suggest that the bimodal stimulation (cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid) improved auditory perception in quiet and the quality of life domain of social activities.

Over the past decade, the adoption of universal hearing screening in newborns has led to earlier detection of hearing problems and significant lowering of the age of first cochlear implantation. As a consequence, recipients are now expected to keep their cochlear implants (CIs) for a longer period of time. Comprehensive longitudinal information on CI reliability is essential for device choice. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability (in children and adults) of the latest generation of the Digisonic(®) SP CI launched in 2006 by Neurelec. Failure rate (FR) and cumulative survival rate (CSR) for a 5-year period were calculated. This survey is a multicenter retrospective study. A questionnaire was sent to nine CI centers requesting information about patients implanted with Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP CIs. FR and CSR over a 5-year period were calculated on this group. Collaborating centers collected data on 672 patients (362 children and 310 adults) implanted between March 2006 and March 2011. The overall rate of explantation was 2.23 % (15 cases): six devices were explanted due to device failure (0.89 %) and nine were explanted for medical reasons (1.34 %). Four patients were lost to follow-up. The CSR at 5 years was 98.51 % on all patients, 98.48 % for children and 98.57 % for adults. FR was 0.97 % for adults and 0.83 % for children. This first independent study that assesses FR and CSR on the current generation of Digisonic(®) SP CI represents an important resource that can help clinicians and patients during their device choice.

Objective Report outcomes of 2 first known cases using a cochlear implant (CI) and a contralateral auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Patients Two adult patients with postlingual sensorineural deafness. Intervention Both patients had unilateral CI insertion followed by contralateral ABI insertion. In 1 case, there was a large left vestibular schwannoma in the only hearing left ear. CI insertion was first performed in the right longstanding deaf ear. Shortly afterward during the left translabyrinthine surgery, a left ABI was simultaneously inserted. The second patient had Meniere's disease controlled initially by right translabyrinthine vestibular neurectomy but complicated by a right dead ear. When symptoms recurred she underwent left retrosigmoid vestibular neurectomy with auditory nerve preservation. This allowed left CI insertion and a subsequent right ABI insertion. Main outcome measures Pure tone audiometry (PTA), speech discrimination in quiet (SDq), speech discrimination in noise (SDn), and sound localization. Testing was performed with the following: 1) ABI activated alone, 2) CI activated alone, 3) CI and ABI activation (CI-ABI), and 4) CI linked to a contralateral routing of sound (CROS) hearing aid system (CI-CROS). Quality of life assessments were made using a validated questionnaire. Results PTA was worst with the ABI activated alone. SDq was best with the CI-CROS. Regarding SDn with noise coming from the CI side, the head shadow effect was only overcome by the CI-ABI; however, the CI-CROS worked best in the presence of noise opposite to the CI. The CI activated alone and CI-ABI produced useful sound localization. Quality-of-life assessments were best with the CI-CROS. Conclusion Bilateral sound detection seems more beneficial than unilateral in profoundly deaf cases with only 1 functioning auditory nerve. A CI-CROS may produce similar gains to a CI-ABI.

Objectives: We describe and evaluate the process of fixation of the Digisonic SP cochlear implant with two titanium screws. Methods: The characteristics of this implant allow cochlear implantation using a minimal incision, a subperiosteal pocket, and fixation with two titanium screws, without drilling a custom-fitted seat or creating suture-retaining holes in the skull. The fixation system relies on two tailfins for use of osseo-integratable screws, incorporated into the cochlear implant housing. The first version of this fixation system was modified after a case of device migration: The size of the titanium insert inside the silicone tailfin was increased. Data on 156 patients (8 months to 86 years of age) from a 4-year period in 6 cochlear implantation centers were retrospectively evaluated. Ten patients have undergone bilateral implantation. Results: Of 166 implantations, 4 postoperative infections and 1 device failure after head trauma were reported. No cerebrospinal fluid leaks or epidural hematomas were reported. One device migration was observed in the first series; no device migrations occurred in the second series. Conclusions: The fixation system with screws embedded in the Digisonic SP involves a fast and simple surgical technique that seems to efficiently prevent implant migration.

International audience; Middle ear implantation is an efficient procedure to restore moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss (HL) in selected patients. Implantation of such devices requires ossicular chain integrity. Patients suffering from otosclerosis with mixed HL should be eligible for this treatment after stapes surgery with air-bone gap closure. To address this issue, we report four cases of middle ear implantation after or during stapes surgery. Results and complications obtained with Vibrant SoundBridge, MedEl and Middle Ear Transducer, Otologics are reported. Audiologic results were similar to those obtained in cases of sensorineural HL. One case of postoperative labyrinthitis was observed.

Clinical study of the keyhole acoustic neuroma retrosigmoid approach for facial nerve and hearing preservation.This was a prospective case review from October 1993 to December 1998 in a referral hospital care unit.A total of 119 consecutive patients with a tumor size of25 mm in the cerebellopontine angle corrected by a retrosigmoid approach were included in the study.Standard audiometric and imaging assessments, complete tumor removal by using endoscopy-assisted control, and nerve monitoring.House-Brackmann facial nerve grade and hearing level by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery classification.Grades I and II facial nerve function was obtained in 96% of cases, measurable hearing was preserved in 49% of cases, and 30% of cases achieved serviceable hearing.The retrosigmoid approach is a safe and reliable approach in random patients with small and medium-sized acoustic neuromas.

To present the option to use a Fascia Temporalis Superficialis pedicled flap for the implantation of a transcutaneous magnetic osseointegrated auditory implant in selected revision procedures. Osseointegrated auditory implants represent a reliable option for patients. Skin intolerance and aesthetic issue are two clear limitations of percutaneous system. Magnetic transcutaneous devices have been developed to overcome such drawbacks. The current new experience of such a device shows that they are well tolerated in primary cases. However, switching from a previous percutaneous system raises the question of skin tolerance. Hence, previous implanted abutments with skin penetration and skin reduction are more likely cause to skin intolerance and complication. We described here the option to use a Fascia Temporalis Superficialis flap to cover the implanted magnet. When switching from percutaneous osseointegrated auditory implant to transcutaneous system in case of high risk of skin intolerance, this procedure may provide sufficient tissue coverage to prevent skin intolerance, pain and delayed extrusion.

Patients implanted with the Digisonic® SP device showed better identification scores than those implanted with the Convex device, with skills continuing to improve over a longer time period. Technological improvements were beneficial in terms of speech perception in quiet.To compare speech perception skills for post-lingually deaf patients implanted with a previous Neurelec device, the Digisonic® Convex, with those implanted with a more recent one, the Digisonic® SP, which provides more electrodes and a faster stimulation rate.This was a retrospective study of 100 implanted patients, 45 with the Digisonic® Convex implant and 55 with the Digisonic® SP. Speech perception (dissyllabic words and sentences, in open set) was evaluated until 1 year after implantation.Patients fitted with the Digisonic® SP implant showed significantly better scores after 3, 6, and 12 months (mean scores: 53%, 62%, and 68% for words; 58%, 69%, and 75% for sentences) than those fitted with the Convex implant (34%, 42%, and 43% for words; 38%, 59%, and 51% for sentences). The improvement in speech perception after implantation for SP patients continued throughout the 12 months for words and 6 months for sentences, versus 6 months for words and 3 months for sentences for Convex patients.

To describe a unique presentation of mastoid hyperpneumatization with atlantoaxial air fistulization.Case report, 30-year-old male patient.Descriptive case report.Subjective aural fullness, with objective tympanogram changes, induced by head rotation.The patient complained of left ear fullness exclusively and repeatedly during neck extension and head rotation to the right side. These head positional changes cause a change of pressure of the atlantoaxial intra-articular emphysematous air, and these fluctuations in pressure are transmitted through the communicating mastoid fistula to the middle ear and tympanic membrane, leading to the sensation of ear fullness.We hereby describe the first case of mastoid hyperpneumatization fistulizing into the atlantoaxial joint and presenting with an ipsilateral aural fullness that occurs mainly during contralateral head rotation and extension. This is a characteristic clinical sign that has not been previously described.

Hypothesis: Direct pressure applied on the inner ear cannot induce hearing loss. Background: Three possible causes have been described in the literature for inner ear permanent lesions during scuba diving: pressure imbalance between the middle ear and the external ear, appearance of microbubbles in the internal ear, and direct effect of pressure on the inner ear. We seek to determine whether this last factor can be involved. Methods: We submitted two groups of guinea pigs previously implanted with an electrode in the round window to a protocol of air diving in a hyperbaric chamber. Eardrums of animals in one of the two groups had been perforated beforehand. Twenty dives were practiced over 4 weeks. We chose dive parameters consistent with common sport diving: maximal pressure of 4 atmosphere absolute and duration of 30 minutes. Auditory threshold and cochlear spontaneous activity were recorded at regular intervals. Furthermore, we recorded spontaneous cochlear activity in Heliox 400-m and 600-m dives to determine whether our conclusions hold for extreme diving. Results: In the group with perforated eardrums, no variation of those parameters were recorded, even in extreme diving. Important variations were noticed in the other group. Conclusions: Pressure applied directly on the inner ear during divine does not disturb cochlear activity.

Background Acoustic neuroma account for 80% of cerebellopontine angle tumors. Paraganglioma is a rare tumor in this region. Objective The authors report a case of cerebellopontine angle paraganglioma arising from the anterior inferior cerebellar artery. Results The clinical and radiologic features were indistinguishable from those of a neuroma, and only the intraoperative view showed a vascular tumor. Definitive diagnosis was made by histopathologic methods. Conclusions This unique paraganglioma location may be explained by existing embryologic data. The minimal retrosigmoid approach, assisted by endoscopy, allows safe and complete removal of the tumor.