1. TRough versus AUC Monitoring of cyclosporine: A randomized comparison of adverse drug reactions in adult allogeneic stem cell recipients (TRAM study).
- Author
-
Kuijvenhoven MA, Wilhelm AJ, Meijer E, Janssen JJWM, and Swart EL
- Subjects
- Adult, Area Under Curve, Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics, Drug Monitoring methods, Female, Graft Rejection etiology, Graft Rejection immunology, Graft Rejection pathology, Graft Survival physiology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents pharmacokinetics, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute immunology, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology, Lymphoma immunology, Lymphoma pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma immunology, Multiple Myeloma pathology, Nausea immunology, Nausea pathology, ROC Curve, Random Allocation, Renal Tubular Transport, Inborn Errors immunology, Renal Tubular Transport, Inborn Errors pathology, Transplantation, Homologous, Cyclosporine adverse effects, Immunosuppressive Agents adverse effects, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute therapy, Lymphoma therapy, Multiple Myeloma therapy, Nausea chemically induced, Renal Tubular Transport, Inborn Errors chemically induced
- Abstract
Objective: To investigate the incidence and severity of adverse drug reactions of cyclosporine using AUC-targeted therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) compared to trough level (C
trough )-targeted TDM in adult allogeneic stem cell recipients., Methods: Blind, monocenter, intervention study. Subjects were 1:1 randomized into either an AUC group or a Ctrough group. Adverse drug reactions were accessed two and four weeks after start of treatment., Results: Forty patients were included, resulting in 15 evaluable subjects (AUC group) and 13 evaluable subjects (Ctrough group). Grade two/three toxicity was observed in 46% (Ctrough group) versus 60% of subjects (AUC group) (P = .463). There was no significant difference between two and four weeks after start of cyclosporine for nausea (P = .142 resp. P = .122), renal dysfunction (P = .464 resp. P = 1.000), and hypomagnesemia (P = 1.000 resp. P = .411). Subjects in the AUC group reached the therapeutic goal earlier (72,7% versus 43,0% at third sampling point, P = .332) and were within the target range more consistently., Conclusion: This study showed no reduction in incidence and severity of cyclosporine-induced toxicity with AUC- versus trough level-targeted TDM. Although modeled dosing based on AUC led to faster optimal target attainment, this did not result in less toxicity in the early days after transplantation., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF