Search

INTRODUCTION: In trials of amyloid-lowering drugs for Alzheimers disease (AD), differential eligibility may contribute to under-inclusion of racial and ethnic underrepresented groups. We examined plasma amyloid beta 42/40 and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid eligibility for the ongoing AHEAD Study preclinical AD program (NCT04468659). METHODS: Univariate logistic regression models were used to examine group differences in plasma and PET amyloid screening eligibility. RESULTS: Of 4905 participants screened at time of analysis, 1724 were plasma eligible to continue in screening: 13.3% Hispanic Black, 24.7% Hispanic White, 20.8% non-Hispanic (NH) Asian, 24.7% NH Black, and 38.9% NH White. Plasma eligibility differed across groups in models controlling for covariates (odds ratio from 1.9 to 4.0 compared to the NH White reference group, P

Two of every three persons living with dementia reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The projected increase in global dementia rates is expected to affect LMICs disproportionately. However, the majority of global dementia care costs occur in high-income countries (HICs), with dementia research predominantly focusing on HICs. This imbalance necessitates LMIC-focused research to ensure that characterization of dementia accurately reflects the involvement and specificities of diverse populations. Development of effective preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches for dementia in LMICs requires targeted, personalized, and harmonized efforts. Our article represents timely discussions at the 2022 Symposium on Dementia and Brain Aging in LMICs that identified the foremost opportunities to advance dementia research, differential diagnosis, use of neuropsychometric tools, awareness, and treatment options. We highlight key topics discussed at the meeting and provide future recommendations to foster a more equitable landscape for dementia prevention, diagnosis, care, policy, and management in LMICs. HIGHLIGHTS: Two-thirds of persons with dementia live in LMICs, yet research and costs are skewed toward HICs. LMICs expect dementia prevalence to more than double, accompanied by socioeconomic disparities. The 2022 Symposium on Dementia in LMICs addressed advances in research, diagnosis, prevention, and policy. The Nairobi Declaration urges global action to enhance dementia outcomes in LMICs.

Abstract Background Effective risk communication about medicines is crucial to the success of all pharmacovigilance activities but remains a worldwide challenge. Risk communication has been conducted in Malaysia for decades, yet awareness on the communication methods remains low among healthcare professionals. While international guidelines are available, clear guidance on effectively communicating the risks of medicines in specific countries is scarce. This study aimed to establish a consensus on the priority strategies for enhancing risk communication about medicines by regulators. Methods We conducted a two-round modified Delphi survey among local and international communication experts, and also recipients of medicines risk communication in Malaysia. We developed a list of 37 strategies based on the findings of our previous studies. In Round 1, participants were asked to rate the priority for each strategy using a 5-point Likert scale and suggest additional strategies via free-text comments. Strategies scoring a mean of ≥ 3.75 were included in Round 2. We defined consensus for the final list of strategies a priori as > 75% agreement. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results Our final Delphi panel (n = 39, 93% response rate) comprised medicines communication experts from nine countries and Malaysian healthcare professionals. Following Round 1, we dropped 14 strategies and added 11 strategies proposed by panellists. In the second round, 21 strategies achieved consensus. The priority areas identified were to improve the format and content of risk communication, increase the use of technology, and increase collaboration with various stakeholders. Priority ratings for the strategy “to offer incentives to pharmaceutical companies which maintain effective communication systems” were significantly higher among recipients compared to communicators [χ2 (1, N = 39) = 10.1; p = 0.039] and among local versus international panellists [χ2 (1, N = 39) = 14.3; p = 0.007]. Conclusions Our study identified 21 priority strategies, which were used to develop a strategic plan for enhancing medicines risk communication. This plan is potentially adaptable to all countries with developing pharmacovigilance systems. The difference in views between communicators and recipients, as well as local and international panellists, highlights the importance of involving multiple stakeholders in research.

Mechanisms of resilience against tau pathology in individuals across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum are insufficiently understood. Longitudinal data are necessary to reveal which factors relate to preserved cognition (i.e. cognitive resilience) and brain structure (i.e. brain resilience) despite abundant tau pathology, and to clarify whether these associations are cross-sectional or longitudinal. We used a longitudinal study design to investigate the role of several demographic, biological and brain structural factors in yielding cognitive and brain resilience to tau pathology as measured with PET. In this multicentre study, we included 366 amyloid-β-positive individuals with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease dementia with baseline 18F-flortaucipir-PET and longitudinal cognitive assessments. A subset (n = 200) additionally underwent longitudinal structural MRI. We used linear mixed-effects models with global cognition and cortical thickness as dependent variables to investigate determinants of cognitive resilience and brain resilience, respectively. Models assessed whether age, sex, years of education, APOE-ε4 status, intracranial volume (and cortical thickness for cognitive resilience models) modified the association of tau pathology with cognitive decline or cortical thinning. We found that the association between higher baseline tau-PET levels (quantified in a temporal meta-region of interest) and rate of cognitive decline (measured with repeated Mini-Mental State Examination) was adversely modified by older age (Stβinteraction = -0.062, P = 0.032), higher education level (Stβinteraction = -0.072, P = 0.011) and higher intracranial volume (Stβinteraction = -0.07, P = 0.016). Younger age, higher education and greater cortical thickness were associated with better cognitive performance at baseline. Greater cortical thickness was furthermore associated with slower cognitive decline independent of tau burden. Higher education also modified the negative impact of tau-PET on cortical thinning, while older age was associated with higher baseline cortical thickness and slower rate of cortical thinning independent of tau. Our analyses revealed no (cross-sectional or longitudinal) associations for sex and APOE-ε4 status on cognition and cortical thickness. In this longitudinal study of clinically impaired individuals with underlying Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes, we identified education as the most robust determinant of both cognitive and brain resilience against tau pathology. The observed interaction with tau burden on cognitive decline suggests that education may be protective against cognitive decline and brain atrophy at lower levels of tau pathology, with a potential depletion of resilience resources with advancing pathology. Finally, we did not find major contributions of sex to brain nor cognitive resilience, suggesting that previous links between sex and resilience might be mainly driven by cross-sectional differences.

Abstract Background Studies of animal habitat selection are important to identify and preserve the resources species depend on, yet often little attention is paid to how habitat needs vary depending on behavioral state. Fishers (Pekania pennanti) are known to be dependent on large, mature trees for resting and denning, but less is known about their habitat use when foraging or moving within a home range. Methods We used GPS locations collected during the energetically costly pre-denning season from 12 female fishers to determine fisher habitat selection during two critical behavioral activities: foraging (moving) or resting, with a focus on response to forest structure related to past forest management actions since this is a primary driver of fisher habitat configuration. We characterized behavior based on high-resolution GPS and collar accelerometer data and modeled fisher selection for these two behaviors within a home range (third-order selection). Additionally, we investigated whether fisher use of elements of forest structure or other important environmental characteristics changed as their availability changed, i.e., a functional response, for each behavior type. Results We found that fishers exhibited specialist selection when resting and generalist selection when moving, with resting habitat characterized by riparian drainages with dense canopy cover and moving habitat primarily influenced by the presence of mesic montane mixed conifer forest. Fishers were more tolerant of forest openings and other early succession elements when moving than resting. Conclusions Our results emphasize the importance of considering the differing habitat needs of animals based on their movement behavior when performing habitat selection analyses. We found that resting fishers are more specialist in their habitat needs, while foraging fishers are more generalist and will tolerate greater forest heterogeneity from past disturbance.

Background: In patients with advanced breast cancer (BC), distant metastases happen mainly in the skeleton. This study aimed to investigate the role of 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT in the differential diagnosis of malignant bone lesions from degenerative benign bone diseases in female BC patients. Methods and Results: The study included 39 female BC patients who underwent a baseline 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT bone scans. After lesion detection, a quantitative radiotracer uptake analysis was conducted, and the standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was identified in each patient, and the data were then statistically analyzed. SUVmax values were significantly higher in BC patients with malignant metastasis than in patients with degenerative changes (33.04±15.3 vs. 13.25±5.46 g/mL, P

Background and objectivesSleep and physical activity have gained traction as modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease. Sleep duration is linked to amyloid-β clearance while physical activity is associated with brain volume maintenance. We investigate how sleep duration and physical activity are associated with cognition by testing if the associations between sleep duration or physical activity to cognition are explained by amyloid-β burden and brain volume, respectively. Additionally, we explore the mediating role of tau deposition in sleep duration-cognition and physical activity-cognition relationships.MethodsThis cross-sectional study obtained data from participants in the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4) study, a randomized clinical trial. In trial screening, cognitively unimpaired participants (age 65-85 years) underwent amyloid PET and brain MRI; APOE genotype and lifestyle questionnaire data were obtained. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC). Self-reported nightly sleep duration and weekly physical activity were the primary predictors. Regional Aβ and tau pathologies and volumes were the proposed variables influencing relationships between sleep duration or physical activity and cognition.ResultsAβ data were obtained from 4322 participants (1208 with MRI, 59% female, 29% amyloid positive). Sleep duration was associated with a Aβ composite score (β = -0.005, CI: (-0.01, -0.001)) and Aβ burden in the anterior cingulate (ACC) (β = -0.012, CI: (-0.017, -0.006)) and medial orbitofrontal cortices (MOC) (β = -0.009, CI: (-0.014, -0.005)). Composite (β = -1.54, 95% CI:(-1.93, -1.15)), ACC (β = -1.22, CI:(-1.54, -0.90)) and MOC (β = -1.44, CI:(-1.86, -1.02)) Aβ deposition was associated with PACC. Sleep duration-PACC association was explained by Aβ burden in path analyses. Physical activity was associated with hippocampal (β = 10.57, CI: (1.06, 20.08)), parahippocampal (β = 9.3, CI: (1.69, 16.91)), entorhinal (β = 14.68, CI: (1.75, 27.61), and fusiform gyral (β = 38.38, CI: (5.57, 71.18)) volumes, which were positively associated with PACC (p

IntroductionPrenatal exome sequencing (pES) can enhance genetic diagnosis of fetuses with structural anomalies and has recently been introduced as a national service in England. We aimed to examine service outcomes such as diagnostic yield (definite final diagnosis), referral rate, and sources of referral, and explore variation in outcomes of pES by individual or service level factors between 01 October 2021 and 30 June 2022.MethodspES testing results from the National Health Service laboratories performing testing were linked to National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service data and the Maternity Services Data Set and descriptive statistics computed.ResultsThere were 475,089 women who gave birth in England during the study period. The referral rate for pES was 8.6 (95% CI 7.8, 9.4) per 10,000 maternities. About 59% of those referred proceeded with pES testing and 35% of women who proceeded received a definite final diagnosis with a median turnaround time of 15 days. Of those who had pES testing, 64.6% had a live birth, 25.3% underwent termination of pregnancy (median gestational age at termination: 26 weeks), and 9.3% had a stillbirth. Among the 85 women who had a definite final diagnosis, 40% had a termination of pregnancy, 18% had a stillbirth, and 42% had a live birth. The corresponding figures among women without a definite final diagnosis were 18%, 5%, and 78%, respectively. Among women who had a termination of pregnancy, the median gestational age at final report was 24.9 weeks and 26.2 weeks at termination. Variation observed in some of the characteristics and outcomes between regional services were limited by small sample size.ConclusionThis study showed that of those referred, pES testing provided a diagnosis for one in three pregnancies with a fetal anomaly across England during the study period when other tests had been non-informative. Women who opted for a termination of pregnancy underwent the procedure at relatively late gestations. Earlier referral for pES, streamlining pathways, and faster turnaround times may help results to be available at an earlier gestation to allow families more time to make decisions around continuing or terminating their pregnancy. The variation in service outcomes between regional services needs to be investigated further to understand the reasons for these differences.

Background Neonates undergoing emergency abdominal surgery frequently require a stoma; closing this stoma with a second operation is an essential part of recovery. Timing of closure varies. Optimal timing is unclear and would be best resolved through a randomised controlled trial; such a trial is likely to be challenging. Aim To determine if it is feasible to conduct a clinical trial comparing ‘early’ versus ‘late’ stoma closure in neonates. Design Mixed methods comprising three parallel workstreams incorporating: a clinician survey, prospective observational cohort study, parent interviews, focus groups, database analyses and consensus meeting. Setting Specialist neonatal surgical centres across the United Kingdom. Participants and data sources Neonatologists, neonatal surgeons, neonatal dietitians and neonatal nurses who care for neonates with stomas. Neonates with recent stoma, their parents and the clinicians looking after them. Three existing, overlapping clinical databases. Results One hundred and sixty-six professionals from all 27 neonatal surgical centres completed the survey: 6 weeks was the most common target time for stoma closure across clinical scenarios, although there was wide variation. Timing of closure was influenced by nutrition, growth and stoma complications. The prospective cohort study enrolled 56 infants from 8 centres. Infants were mostly preterm with necrotising enterocolitis or intestinal perforation. Clinicians identified extreme preterm gestation and clinical conditions as reasons for not randomising babies into a hypothetical trial comparing early and late stoma closure. Parents and healthcare professionals identified that comparator arms needed more clinical flexibility in relation to timing of stoma closure. Analysis of existing databases revealed wide variation in current timing of stoma closure in neonates and identified approximately 300 eligible infants for a trial per annum in the United Kingdom. Conclusions A trial of ‘early’ compared to ‘late’ stoma closure in neonates is feasible and is important to families and health professionals. The population of eligible babies in the United Kingdom is sufficient for such a trial. Challenges centre around lack of equipoise in certain scenarios, specifically: extremely preterm infants; infants waiting too long for stoma closure in the ‘late’ comparator; and logistical issues in closing a stoma at a trial-allocated time. These challenges are addressable by incorporating flexibility based on gestation at birth, communicating that both trial arms are standard practice and valid treatment options, and providing resources, for example, for operating lists. Future work We recommend the following population, intervention, comparator and outcome as a starting point to inform future trial design. Population: neonates with stomas (excluding those with a fixed treatment pathway). Intervention: stoma closure at 6 weeks and after 32 weeks post conceptual age. Comparator: expectant management with stoma closure undertaken when the clinical team determines is best for the infant. Primary outcomes: weight gain/growth or length of hospital stay. Study registration This study is registered as IRAS Project ID 278331, REC Reference 20/LO/1227. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128617) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 71. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Plain language summary Babies who develop a bowel problem soon after birth may need surgical treatment and a stoma (where the bowel is brought out into a bag on the tummy). Stomas can be life-saving but can also cause problems. They must be ‘closed’ with a second operation once the baby has got better. The timing of this second operation varies between hospitals and we do not know the best time to do it. To find out the best time to close a baby’s stoma, we wanted to conduct a clinical trial. This would mean some babies having their stoma closed ‘early’, and other babies ‘later’ and seeing which group did better. Babies would be put into the ‘early’ or ‘late’ group at random so that we could have a fair comparison. Because doing a trial may be challenging, we first set out to find out if a trial would be feasible in the Timing of Stoma Closure in Neonates study. What we did Found out what currently happens to babies with a stoma through a survey of healthcare staff and looking at data from several national databases. Collected data on 56 babies with stomas in 8 hospitals, including asking their doctors whether they would recruit these babies to a trial and when they would close their stoma. Interviewed parents of children who had had a stoma. Held focus groups with staff at the eight hospitals. Held a meeting for National Health Service staff and parents to discuss the way forwards. What we found Parents and doctors think this question is important and that a clinical trial is a good idea. Deciding on the timing of stoma closure in the trial and what we mean by ‘early’ and ‘late’ is critical to the success of a trial. The timing may need to take into account that some babies born extremely preterm may be difficult to include. A trial that compares how well infants grow and/or length of stay in hospital between babies having early or later stoma closure may well be feasible. What happens next The National Institute for Health and Care Research (research arm of the Department of Health and Social Care) will use this to information to help decide if they would like to fund a trial in the future. Scientific summary Background Neonates undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for problems such as necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) or a congenital bowel obstruction frequently require a stoma. While stomas can be life-saving, they pose a number of challenges including fluid and electrolyte imbalance, local wound and skin problems, malnutrition and growth failure. Reversing (closing) these stomas with a second operation is therefore an essential part of an infant’s recovery. The timing of stoma closure is known to vary between hospitals and, indeed, clinicians and the best time remains unclear, with conflicting evidence from published studies of low methodological quality. Rationale Determining the best time to close stomas in neonates is imperative, as it has significant implications for: infant health outcomes (e.g. stoma complications and growth) families (e.g. reduced neonatal unit stay, healthcare burden, time off work) healthcare providers [e.g. neonatal unit bed-days, parenteral nutrition (PN) use, surgery, cost]. In addition, reducing unwarranted variability in surgical care is a key priority for the NHS. The most methodologically robust way to determine optimal timing of stoma closure would be through an adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT). A trial of different stoma closure times in neonates is likely to be challenging, due to: the patient group who have heterogenous underlying diseases and comorbidities clinician factors such as willingness to recruit parent factors such as trial acceptability. This study aimed to explore these potential challenges and determine if a trial comparing ‘early’ and ‘late’ stoma closure is feasible. Aims The overarching aim of the Timing of Stoma Closure in Neonates (ToSCiN) study was to answer the question: is it feasible to conduct a RCT comparing ‘early’ versus ‘late’ stoma closure in neonates? Objectives The specific objectives of the ToSCiN study were: to establish current UK practice for stoma closure in neonates to determine whether there is equipoise among clinicians (neonatal surgeons and neonatologists) and allied health professionals (specialist nurses and dietitians) over when it is best to close stomas in neonates to define ‘early’ and ‘late’ stoma closure for a potential trial to define a population of neonates for inclusion in a trial (in whom there is significant uncertainty over timing) and determine how many infants are eligible for inclusion to establish the most appropriate design and outcome measures for a trial to determine the willingness of parents, neonatal surgeons and neonatologists to include neonates in a trial that would randomise to ‘early’ or ‘late’ stoma closure and identify potential barriers to recruitment to assess the suitability of using routinely collected data for gathering clinical information for a trial. Methods The ToSCiN study used a mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative methodology) and comprised three parallel workstreams. Workstream 1: Survey of clinician and allied health professional perspectives on neonatal stoma closure An online survey was sent to clinicians and allied health professionals involved in the care of newborn infants with stomas at neonatal surgical units across the UK. The survey questions and a series of clinical scenarios to explore current practice/preferences, perspectives on ‘early’ versus ‘late’ stoma closure, which groups of infants should be included in a trial comparing these, preferred trial design including outcomes and barriers to achieving the optimal timing of closure. Workstream 2: Parent and clinician perspectives regarding a clinical trial of neonatal stoma closure This workstream took place in eight UK neonatal surgical centres and comprised three elements: (2.1) An observational cohort study of neonates who had a stoma formed Key clinical and demographic information was recorded prospectively. The data set comprised factors that could influence the timing of stoma closure and outcomes which are likely to be important in a future trial. (2.2) Questionnaires for the principal clinicians (surgeon and neonatologist) caring for each infant recruited to the cohort study These were completed at three time points and explored the acceptability of a hypothetical trial to clinicians for each infant. Time points: (1) approximately 1 week after stoma formation to explore randomising the infant to a trial, (2) 6 weeks after stoma formation to explore following an allocation to early closure intervention and (3) 12 weeks after stoma formation to explore following an allocation to late closure comparator. (2.3) A qualitative study incorporating: (1) focus groups with clinicians and (2) interviews with parents of neonates who had a stoma Multidisciplinary healthcare professional focus groups explored equipoise, current practice and views on early versus late closure, willingness to recruit to a trial, acceptability of a trial and prioritised outcome measures. Parents of infants in the cohort study and additional parents recruited via social media were invited for a telephone or video interview. Their views were explored on: having a child with a stoma, acceptability of a trial, timing of recruitment, potential barriers to trial participation, trial participant information materials, approach to consent for a trial and prioritised outcome measures. Workstream 3: Analysis of three existing national databases Analyses were carried out on three existing national data sets [from the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD), The British Association of Paediatric Surgeons Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (BAPS-CASS) and Hospital Episode Statistics – Admitted Patient Care (HES-APC)]. The analyses aimed to: (1) establish current UK practice, (2) define a population for trial inclusion and provide the number of eligible infants and (3) establish values for key outcome measures. Consensus meeting This was held using an online video platform at the end of the study period when data collection and preliminary analysis had been completed. Professionals and parents previously involved were invited and further parents were recruited via social media. A summary of results from the three workstreams was presented to attendees. Facilitated small group discussions took place, followed by a summary of small group discussions presented by group facilitators to all attendees, and electronic voting was conducted about trial acceptability and design. Results Workstream 1 Results One hundred and sixty-six professionals completed the survey with at least one respondent from each of the 27 UK centres. Six weeks was the most commonly stated target time for closure across all scenarios, although there was a high degree of variability, with intervals of 12 weeks or more frequently advocated. While 70–76% of respondents preferred closure prior to discharge in preterm infants and a term infant with jejunostomy, only 46% preferred this in term infants with ileostomy. A sizeable proportion (41%) use weight, rather than time, to determine when to close a stoma. Thematic analysis of free text identified nine key themes influencing decision-making, mostly related to nutrition, growth and stoma complications. With regard to potential trial design, 86% of respondents indicated they would include preterm infants with NEC/SIP and 72% term infants with other conditions. Closure at 6 weeks was the most commonly cited timing of early intervention; the preferred later time point was 12 weeks. Growth was most commonly selected as the favoured primary outcome for a trial, followed by time to full feeds, length of stay and duration of PN. Workstream 2 Results Cohort study Fifty-six infants were enrolled from eight UK units. Infants were mostly preterm (44/56), with median birthweight 961 g (range 415–3962 g). The cohort comprised 37 infants with NEC/SIP and 19 with other diagnoses. Most stomas were in the small bowel, formed at a median of 8 days (range 1–80 days). At 1 week following stoma formation, 18/56 infants were mechanically ventilated, 8 were receiving inotropes and 13 had received blood products in the preceding 24 hours. At this point, surgeons stated they would be willing to randomise 31 infants (59%) into a hypothetical trial of 6- versus 12-week closure. The commonest reason for not being willing was the infant being ‘too small or premature’. At 6 weeks post stoma, median weight was 2024 g (range 795–4460 g) and nine remained ventilated. Eighty per cent (42/56) were reported to have gained weight in the past week. Median enteral feed volume was 127 ml/kg/day, stoma output was < 20 ml/kg/day in 86% and stoma-related complications were reported in one-third. Surgeons would be willing to follow theoretical trial allocation for ‘early’ closure in 17/56 (33%). In nine infants, the stoma had already been closed. The main reasons for not being willing to follow trial allocation were current clinical status and size. Among infants whom surgeons said they would not be willing to follow trial allocation, most (16/25) were < 28 weeks’ gestation at birth and were lighter (median weight 1609 vs. 2090 g). Twelve weeks after stoma formation, median weight was 2548 g and 10% (4/52) remained ventilated. Most (23/42; 55%) were still receiving PN (a higher proportion than at 6 weeks) and 12% (5/42) were not receiving any enteral feed. Stoma-related problems were present in one-third and one-quarter had stoma output > 20 ml/kg/day. Surgeons stated they would be unwilling to follow trial allocation of closure at 12 weeks in 24 infants: 12 of these had required earlier stoma closure and 9 (mainly premature infants) were considered unsuitable for stoma closure for a variety of mainly clinical reasons (rather than logistical or family factors). Again, most infants for whom the surgeon was unwilling to follow trial allocation were < 28 weeks' gestation at birth (13/24). Overall stoma closure took place before the end of the data collection period in 82% (46/56 infants, 4 infants died with a stoma in situ and 6 infants still had a stoma). Median time to closure was 9.9 weeks (range 4.4–28.3 weeks), at median 88 days of age and weight of 2631 g. Qualitative study We interviewed 24 parents (17 mothers, 7 fathers) of babies who required a stoma in the last 3 years in the UK (July 2021–February 2022). Fifteen parents were recruited via hospital sites and nine via social media. Thirty-six staff (14 surgeons, 10 consultant neonatologists, 6 neonatal surgical nurses, 2 research nurses, 1 dietitian and 3 ‘other’ roles) from five study sites took part in one of six focus groups (November–December 2021). Most parents and staff considered the proposed ToSCiN trial to be acceptable and wanted the research question to be answered. Staff would be willing to randomise babies, except the most extremely preterm, to the trial and parents would hypothetically consent to their baby taking part if the ‘emotive’ ‘early’ (6 weeks) and ‘late’ (12 weeks) terminology was changed. Some parents and staff, however, had clear trial arm preference and concerns about the alternative trial arm. They felt that decisions about when to close a stoma should be led by the overall health and well-being of the baby. Stoma-related factors, logistical and organisational factors and family factors also influenced views on acceptable timing of stoma closure. These findings highlight potential challenges for recruitment and retention and trial success. Workstream 3 Results While direct comparison was limited by differences in data set populations and coverage, there was a reasonably consistent number of potentially eligible infants with a stoma for NEC/SIP across data sets, with 163 in 1 year in the BAPS-CASS cohort and mean annual volumes of 193 (NNRD) and 192 (HES-APC). HES-APC was used to estimate non-NEC infant numbers, as it had the most comprehensive coverage, with a mean of 118 per year. The total UK population of potentially eligible infants would therefore be approximately 300 per annum. Median stoma durations for babies with NEC/SIP were as follows: BAPS-CASS 63 days; NNRD 60 days and HES-APC 78 days. For infants with stomas for other reasons, closure was usually earlier: NNRD 45 days; HES-APC 74 days; and in the BAPS-CASS meconium ileus cohort, 51 days. HES-APC included babies who were discharged home with a stoma in situ, hence longer median stoma durations. Consensus meeting The consensus meeting was attended by 52 individuals from a range of health professional and non-professional backgrounds, including 7 parents. Voting on key aspects of trial design showed: (1) 83% favoured including all infants with a stoma, (2) 58% favoured comparing closure at 6 weeks after stoma formation with expectant management rather than comparison to a specific late timepoint, and (3) the favoured primary outcomes were weight gain/growth (38%) and length of hospital stay (32%). Conclusions We found that a randomised trial of early compared to late stoma closure in neonates is feasible and is important to families and health professionals. We identified the following components as being critical to a successful future trial: comparison of closure at 6 weeks versus expectant management comparison that accounts for completed gestational age, rather than solely duration of stoma. We identified the potential population and outcomes for such a trial and established that a sufficient population exists in the UK. We also identified that a trial comparing ‘early’ and ‘late’ closure at rigidly defined time points (e.g. closure at 6 compared to 12 weeks) would not be feasible. The principal challenge for trial conduct was found to be the ‘baby-led’ narrative that came through strongly from study participants. Parents and professionals appeared to lack equipoise in certain scenarios. However, this lack of personal equipoise is not exclusive to ToSCiN, and similar themes have been overcome in trials in the past (including complex surgical trials) by optimising communication. Our findings provide valuable insight into how best to do this in a future trial. Other challenges identified include: (1) concerns about inclusion of extremely preterm infants, (2) concerns about infants waiting too long for stoma closure if randomised to the ‘late’ comparator arm and (3) logistical arrangements for closing a stoma at the time dictated by trial allocation. These challenges are eminently addressable, by designing the trial to: (1) incorporate a degree of flexibility (e.g. using ‘expectant management’ as the comparator), (2) make allowances for certain groups (e.g. having a higher corrected gestational age limit for extremely preterm infants) and (3) ensure parents and professionals are aware both trial arms are standard practice and valid treatment options. Key research recommendations We recommend the following population, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICO) as a starting point to inform the design of a future trial: Population: neonates with stomas, excluding those with a stoma as part of a fixed treatment pathway, for example, anorectal malformations and Hirschsprung’s disease. Intervention: stoma closure at 6 weeks post stoma formation and where 32 weeks post-conceptual age has been reached. Comparator: expectant management with stoma closure undertaken when the clinical team determines is best for the infant. Outcomes: weight gain/growth or length of hospital stay should be the primary outcome measure. In order to optimise a trial, we recommend the following practical steps: Involve higher volume neonatal surgical centres for efficient recruitment. Ensure trial staff at each centre are highly trained regarding current standard practice and equipoise. Approach parents 1–2 weeks after stoma formation. Provide resources to centres to permit stoma closure as per the trial protocol, for example, for ring-fenced operating theatre time and possibility of extended hospital stay. Study registration This study is registered as IRAS Project ID 278331, REC Reference 20/LO/1227. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128617) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 71. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

PURPOSEResponse assessment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) with positron emission tomography-computerized tomography (PET-CT) is standard of care in well-resourced settings but unavailable in most African countries. We aimed to investigate correlations between changes in PET-CT findings at interim analysis with changes in blood test results in pediatric patients with cHL in 17 South African centers.METHODSChanges in ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), albumin, total white cell count (TWC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and absolute eosinophil count were compared with PET-CT Deauville scores (DS) after two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine in 84 pediatric patients with cHL. DS 1-3 denoted rapid early response (RER) while DS 4-5 denoted slow early response (SER). Missing values were imputed using the k-nearest neighbor algorithm. Baseline and follow-up blood test values were combined into a single difference variable. Data were split into training and testing sets for analysis using Python scikit-learn 1.2.2 with logistic regression, random forests, naïve Bayes, and support vector machine classifiers.RESULTSRandom forest analysis achieved the best validated test accuracy of 73% when predicting RER or SER from blood samples. When applied to the full data set, the optimal model had a predictive accuracy of 80% and a receiver operating characteristic AUC of 89%. The most predictive variable was the differences in ALC, contributing 21% to the model. Differences in ferritin, LDH, and TWC contributed 15%-16%. Differences in ESR, hemoglobin, and albumin contributed 11%-12%.CONCLUSIONChanges in low-cost, widely available blood tests may predict chemosensitivity for pediatric cHL without access to PET-CT, identifying patients who may not require radiotherapy. Changes in these nonspecific blood tests should be assessed in combination with clinical findings and available imaging to avoid undertreatment.

BackgroundHypotension is a common entity in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and is reported in 24%–50% of preterm infants with birth weight less than 1,500 g. Rapid diagnosis and aggressive management is crucial to reduce its detrimental effects on end-organs especially the brain. Physicians often rely on blood pressure alone as a reliable indicator of tissue perfusion, but variations exist in the definition of this crucial parameter. There are also practice variations in the use of diagnostic tools and management modalities among physicians.MethodologyA physician-based cross-sectional survey of management practices of hypotension in preterm neonates in Indian NICUs was conducted using an online survey tool. The questionnaire addressed diagnostic criteria used, utility of echocardiography for the assessment of hypotension, and management strategies used, such as volume expansion, inotropes and steroids.ResultsThree hundred and twenty physicians, working predominantly in Level III NICUs, responded to the survey. The practice of delayed cord clamping was followed in the units of 78% respondents. Only 44% respondents had an institutional written protocol for the management of hypotension. The criteria for the diagnosis of hypotension varied, with 52% using mean blood pressure (BP) less than gestational age as the criteria. Capillary refill time, blood pressure and heart rate were the most common clinical criteria used. 85% respondents used echocardiography in the NICU, but only 73% utilised it for assessment of a hypotensive neonate. Physicians preferred a ‘volume-inotrope-echo-steroid’ strategy, with 85% respondents using volume expansion. Dopamine was the preferred first line inotrope, followed by norepinephrine and low-dose epinephrine.ConclusionThis survey reflects significant variations in practice amongst neonatal physicians in India. Bedside targeted echocardiography needs to be better utilised as a vital tool to determine the pathophysiology of disease and hemodynamic monitoring in the management of hypotension in neonates. While further research is needed on outcome-oriented objectives, awareness and dissemination of already existing guidelines would be useful to standardize clinical practice.

The poor generalizability of clinical research data due to the enrollment of highly educated, non-Latinx White participants hampers the development of therapies for Alzheimers disease (AD). Black and Latinx older adults have a greater risk for dementia, yet it is unclear how health-care disparities and sociocultural factors influence potential AD therapies and prognosis. Low enrollment of under-represented populations may be attributable to several factors including greater exclusion due to higher rates of comorbidities, lower access to AD clinics, and the legacy of unethical treatment in medical research. This perspective outlines solutions tested in the Brain Health Registry (BHR) and the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), including culturally-informed digital research methods, community-engaged research strategies, leadership from under-represented communities, and the reduction of exclusion criteria based on comorbidities. Our successes demonstrate that it is possible to increase the inclusion and engagement of under-represented populations into US-based clinical studies, thereby increasing the generalizability of their results.

INTRODUCTION: The Alzheimers disease (AD) continuum begins with a long asymptomatic or preclinical stage, during which amyloid beta (Aβ) is accumulating for more than a decade prior to widespread cortical tauopathy, neurodegeneration, and manifestation of clinical symptoms. The AHEAD 3-45 Study (BAN2401-G000-303) is testing whether intervention with lecanemab (BAN2401), a humanized immunoglobulin 1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that preferentially targets soluble aggregated Aβ, initiated during this asymptomatic stage can slow biomarker changes and/or cognitive decline. The AHEAD 3-45 Study is conducted as a Public-Private Partnership of the Alzheimers Clinical Trial Consortium (ACTC), funded by the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Eisai Inc. METHODS: The AHEAD 3-45 Study was launched on July 14, 2020, and consists of two sister trials (A3 and A45) in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals ages 55 to 80 with specific dosing regimens tailored to baseline brain amyloid levels on screening positron emission tomography (PET) scans: intermediate amyloid (≈20 to 40 Centiloids) for A3 and elevated amyloid (>40 Centiloids) for A45. Both trials are being conducted under a single protocol, with a shared screening process and common schedule of assessments. A3 is a Phase 2 trial with PET-imaging end points, whereas A45 is a Phase 3 trial with a cognitive composite primary end point. The treatment period is 4 years. The study utilizes innovative approaches to enriching the sample with individuals who have elevated brain amyloid. These include recruiting from the Trial-Ready Cohort for Preclinical and Prodromal Alzheimers disease (TRC-PAD), the Australian Dementia Network (ADNeT) Registry, and the Japanese Trial Ready Cohort (J-TRC), as well as incorporation of plasma screening with the C2N mass spectrometry platform to quantitate the Aβ 42/40 ratio (Aβ 42/40), which has been shown previously to reliably identify cognitively normal participants not likely to have elevated brain amyloid levels. A blood sample collected at a brief first visit is utilized to screen out individuals who are less likely to have elevated brain amyloid, and to determine the participants eligibility to proceed to PET imaging. Eligibility to randomize into the A3 Trial or A45 Trial is based on the screening PET imaging results. RESULT: The focus of this article is on the innovative design of the study. DISCUSSION: The AHEAD 3-45 Study will test whether with lecanemab (BAN2401) can slow the accumulation of tau and prevent the cognitive decline associated with AD during its preclinical stage. It is specifically targeting both the preclinical and the early preclinical (intermediate amyloid) stages of AD and is the first secondary prevention trial to employ plasma-based biomarkers to accelerate the screening process and potentially substantially reduce the number of screening PET scans.

Paraquat (N,N′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride) is one of the widely used herbicides in Indian agriculture. This compound is at the centre of polemics, involving debates on its effects on sustainable agriculture, potential health risks, and unintended applications. Paraquat (PQ) also gained ill repute globally due to the controversy surrounding its association with Parkinson’s disease [1]. Furthermore, our country witnessed a rise in paraquat-related deaths attributed to its misuse for suicide, prompting a consistent call for proper regulation and a potential ban [2]. Paraquat exerts its toxicity through corrosion and the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) causing cytotoxic effects that contribute to multiorgan failure. There is no specific antidote for paraquat (PQ) poisoning, and the lethal toxicity of this substance is responsible for a poor prognosis, even with minimal consumption.

Abstract There are few population-based studies of sufficient size and follow-up duration to have reliably assessed perinatal outcomes for pregnant women hospitalised with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) covers all 194 consultant-led UK maternity units and included all pregnant women admitted to hospital with an ongoing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here we show that in this large national cohort comprising two years’ active surveillance over four SARS-CoV-2 variant periods and with near complete follow-up of pregnancy outcomes for 16,627 included women, severe perinatal outcomes were more common in women with moderate to severe COVID-19, during the delta dominant period and among unvaccinated women. We provide strong evidence to recommend continuous surveillance of pregnancy outcomes in future pandemics and to continue to recommend SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy to protect both mothers and babies.

Summary: Background: Facelift procedures are a popular method of facial rejuvenation. The most common technique is superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, with several variations. However, the optimal approach remains unclear. This review analyzed previous studies to compare SMAS facelift techniques, their outcomes, and complication rates. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases in September 2022. The search included studies published from January 2000 to September 2022 using keywords such as “facelift,” “complications,” and “outcomes.” Results: This review examined 27 selected studies that evaluated 6 SMAS facelift techniques. The studies involved 6086 patients in total, over 85% of who were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. The complication rates varied depending on the technique used, with the SMAS flap and composite SMAS technique having the highest (5.75%) and lowest (0.05%) complication rates, respectively. The most common complications were temporary facial nerve injury (0.85%) and skin necrosis (0.41%). To date, only one case of permanent facial nerve injury has been reported. Conclusions: On the basis of our findings, SMAS facelift techniques achieve high patient satisfaction rates, with complication rates that vary by technique. The composite SMAS technique showed the lowest complication rates, whereas the SMAS flap showed the highest rate. However, some studies have not reported all complications, making it difficult to determine the best approach. Therefore, future studies are required to identify the most aesthetically pleasing technique with the lowest complication risk.

BackgroundParticipant eligibility for the A4 Study was determined by amyloid PET imaging. Given the disadvantages of amyloid PET imaging in accessibility and cost, blood-based biomarkers may serve as a sufficient biomarker and more cost-effective screening tool for patient enrollment into preclinical AD trials.ObjectiveTo determine if a blood-based screening test can adequately identify amyloid burden in participants screened into a preclinical AD trial.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 224 participants from the A4 Study received an amyloid PET scan (18Florbetapir) within 90 days of blood sample collection. Blood samples from all study participants were processed within 2 h after phlebotomy. Plasma amyloid measures were quantified by Shimazdu and C2 N Diagnostics using mass spectrometry-based platforms. A corresponding subset of blood samples (n = 100) was processed within 24 h after phlebotomy and analyzed by C2 N.ResultsPlasma Aβ42/Aβ40 demonstrated the highest association for Aβ accumulation in the brain with an AUC 0.76 (95%CI = 0.69, 0.82) at C2 N and 0.80 (95%CI = 0.75, 0.86) at Shimadzu. Blood samples processed to plasma within 2 h after phlebotomy provided a better prediction of amyloid PET status than blood samples processed within 24 h (AUC 0.80 versus 0.64; p

BackgroundRecruiting to multi-site trials is challenging, particularly when striving to ensure the randomized sample is demographically representative of the larger disease-suffering population. While previous studies have reported disparities by race and ethnicity in enrollment and randomization, they have not typically investigated whether disparities exist in the recruitment process prior to consent. To identify participants most likely to be eligible for a trial, study sites frequently include a prescreening process, generally conducted by telephone, to conserve resources. Collection and analysis of such prescreening data across sites could provide valuable information to improve understanding of recruitment intervention effectiveness, including whether traditionally underrepresented participants are lost prior to screening.MethodsWe developed an infrastructure within the National Institute on Aging (NIA) Alzheimer's Clinical Trials Consortium (ACTC) to centrally collect a subset of prescreening variables. Prior to study-wide implementation in the AHEAD 3-45 study (NCT NCT04468659), an ongoing ACTC trial recruiting older cognitively unimpaired participants, we completed a vanguard phase with seven study sites. Variables collected included age, self-reported sex, self-reported race, self-reported ethnicity, self-reported education, self-reported occupation, zip code, recruitment source, prescreening eligibility status, reason for prescreen ineligibility, and the AHEAD 3-45 participant ID for those who continued to an in-person screening visit after study enrollment.ResultsEach of the sites was able to submit prescreening data. Vanguard sites provided prescreening data on a total of 1029 participants. The total number of prescreened participants varied widely among sites (range 3-611), with the differences driven mainly by the time to receive site approval for the main study. Key learnings instructed design/informatic/procedural changes prior to study-wide launch.ConclusionCentralized capture of prescreening data in multi-site clinical trials is feasible. Identifying and quantifying the impact of central and site recruitment activities, prior to participants signing consent, has the potential to identify and address selection bias, instruct resource use, contribute to effective trial design, and accelerate trial enrollment timelines.

INTRODUCTION: An analysis of the ethnocultural and socioeconomic composition of Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants is needed to assess the generalizability of ADNI data to diverse populations. METHODS: ADNI data collected between October 2004 and November 2020 were used to determine ethnocultural and educational composition of the sample and differences in the following metrics: screening, screen fails, enrollment, biomarkers. RESULTS: Of 3739 screened individuals, 11% identified as being from ethnoculturally underrepresented populations (e.g., Black, Latinx) and 16% had

IntroductionLung ultrasound (LUS) as an assessment tool has seen significant expansion in adult, paediatric, and neonatal populations due to advancements in point-of-care ultrasound over the past two decades. However, with fewer experts and learning platforms available in low- and middle-income countries and the lack of a standardised supervised training programme, LUS is not currently effectively used to the best of its potential in neonatal units.MethodologyA cross-sectional survey assessed the efficacy of learning LUS via a mentor-based online teaching module (NEOPOCUS). The questionnaire comprised the clinicians’ demographic profile, pre-course skills, and self-assessment of skill acquisition after course completion with ongoing hands-on practice.ResultsA total of 175 clinicians responded to the survey, with the majority (87.9%) working in level 3 and 4 neonatal intensive care units. Clinicians had variable clinical experience. Of them, 53.2% were consultant paediatricians/neonatologists with over 10 years of experience. After the course, there was a significant increase in clinician confidence levels in diagnosing and assessing all LUS pathology, as evidenced by the increase in median cumulative scores [from baseline 6 (interquartile range, IQR, 6–9) to 20 (IQR 16–24), p

The Alzheimer's Association hosted the second Latinos & Alzheimer's Symposium in May 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting was held online over 2 days, with virtual presentations, discussions, mentoring sessions, and posters. The Latino population in the United States is projected to have the steepest increase in Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the next 40 years, compared to other ethnic groups. Latinos have increased risk for AD and other dementias, limited access to quality care, and are severely underrepresented in AD and dementia research and clinical trials. The symposium highlighted developments in AD research with Latino populations, including advances in AD biomarkers, and novel cognitive assessments for Spanish-speaking populations, as well as the need to effectively recruit and retain Latinos in clinical research, and how best to deliver health-care services and to aid caregivers of Latinos living with AD.

Abstract Purpose To determine the histological types of brain tumors diagnosed at the Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya. Methods This retrospective study retrieved patient-archived records at the Kenyatta National Hospital for the period 2016–2019. The histological types of brain tumors were assessed according to age, sex, and the WHO classification for CNS tumors using the GNU PSPP version 1.6.2-g78a33 software. Results were presented in tables and figures. Results During the study period, brain tumors appeared to increase gradually; however, there was a decline in 2018. During the study period, 345 brain tumor records were retrieved. Data on age were missing 33 records; hence, 312 records were included for age analyses. The mean age for the pediatrics and adults was 9 (± 5 SD) and 45 (± 14 SD) years, respectively. 88 (28.2%) and 224 (71.8%) tumors were diagnosed among pediatrics and adults, respectively. Most tumors, 60 (19.2%) were reported in patients aged ≤ 10 years, followed by 55 (17.6%), 48 (15.4%), and 47 (15.1%) in patients aged 31–40, 51–60, and 41–50, years, respectively. In both pediatrics and adults, most tumors were diagnosed in females aged ≤ 10 years and 31–40 years, respectively. Overall, two peaks were observed in patients aged 5–15 years and 40–45 years. Gliomas, 43 (48.9%) and medulloblastomas, 21 (23.9%) were the most common tumors in pediatrics, whereas meningiomas, 107 (47.8%) and gliomas, 70 (31.3%) were the most common tumors in adults. Most pediatric and adult tumors were benign with 50 (56.8%) and 157 (70.1%) cases, respectively. Low-grade gliomas and medulloblastomas were the commonest benign and malignant tumors among pediatrics, with 31 (62%) and 21 (55.3%) cases, respectively. Conversely, meningiomas and high-grade gliomas were the most common benign and malignant tumors in adults, with 106 (67.5%) and 44 (65.7%) cases, respectively. Conclusion This study highlights the existing burden of brain tumors in Kenya and data from KNH may be representative of the national burden of BTs. This study lays a foundation for subsequent clinical and epidemiological studies and emphasizes the need to adopt existing reporting standards to help realize a complete picture of the burden of brain tumors in Kenya.