The aim of this research is to investigate and analyze the level of religious commitment among female students, considering the influence of attachment styles, identity styles, and family functioning. The research employed the structural equation modeling method. The statistical population consisted of students from Al-Zahra University, with 387 participants selected using non-random available sampling, including 287 single and 31 married individuals.According to the findings of this research, there is a positive and significant relationship between informational, normative, and commitment identity styles with religious commitment, with correlation coefficients of r = 0.283, r = 0.552, and r = 0.396 respectively (p ≤ 0.05). The dimensions of family functioning also show a positive and significant relationship with religious commitment, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.453. Furthermore, a positive and significant relationship was found between secure attachment style and religious commitment, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.410. Conversely, avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles exhibit significant negative relationships with religious commitment, with correlation coefficients of r = -0.283, r = -0.254, and r = -0.252 respectively (p ≤ 0.05).Based on these findings, it can be concluded that identity styles and attachment styles have an impact on the level of religious commitment among female students, with family functioning mediating this relationship. Keywords Identity, Attachment, Female Students, Religious Commitment, Family IntroductionReligion is a profoundly significant phenomenon with profound effects on human life. Commitment and belonging to religion lead to positive changes in a person's life, including increased life satisfaction, happiness, and overall health.One component closely related to religious commitment is identity styles. Various classifications exist in this regard, with two prominent examples being those of Berzonsky and Marcia. Marcia categorizes identity into four types: achieved, foreclosed, confused, and diffused. Berzonsky, on the other hand, categorizes identity as informational, normative, and diffuse/avoidant.Attachment styles, another aspect investigated in this research concerning religious commitment, originate from attachment theory developed by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth in 1992. This theory categorizes attachment into two main styles: secure and insecure. Insecure attachment is further divided into three categories: avoidant, ambivalent, and disorganized (Mamarian et al., 1991).Furthermore, religiosity is believed to enhance family functioning. According to Islamic teachings, an efficient family is one where members are committed to religious beliefs, Islamic laws, and ethics, fostering the nurturing and discovery of individuals' talents. This research aims to investigate the relationships between various attachment and identity styles and their impact on religious commitment, with family functioning serving as a potential mediator. MethodologyThe method used in this research is descriptive correlational structural equation modeling (path analysis). The target statistical population in this research includes students of Al-Zahra University (approximately 9,400 people). A sample of 318 individuals was selected using non-random sampling (availability sampling). The software used for analysis in this research included SPSS 26 and Amos 26. The tools used in this research included the religious commitment questionnaire by Jan-Borzuri, Berzonsky's identity style questionnaire, and Collins and Reed's adult attachment style questionnaire. FindingsBased on the results obtained, the relationship between informational identity style, normative identity style, and commitment identity style with religious commitment is positive, with values of r = 0.283, r = 0.552, and r = 0.396, respectively. These relationships are significant (p < 0.05). However, the relationship between avoidant identity style and religious commitment is not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05).Furthermore, the relationship between dimensions of family functioning and religious commitment, with a value of r = 0.453, is positive and meaningful. Additionally, the relationship between secure attachment style and religious commitment, with r = 0.410, is positive and significant. On the other hand, the relationships between avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles with religious commitment, with values of r = 0.283 and r = 0.254, respectively, are significant. The negative relationship with r = -0.252 is also significant (p ≥ 0.05). It should be noted that the correlation matrix between the variables is significant at the p < 0.01 level.Based on the results obtained, the direct effect of secure attachment style on family functioning (0.36), avoidant attachment style on family functioning (-0.15), and ambivalent attachment style on family functioning (-0.20) is statistically significant. Similarly, the direct effect of secure attachment style on religious commitment (0.27) and family functioning on religious commitment (0.35) is also significant.Regarding the direct effects of identity styles and commitment on family functioning, it was found that the direct effect of informational identity style and commitment on family functioning was not significant. However, the direct effects of normative identity style and avoidant identity style on family functioning are statistically significant, with coefficients of 0.31 and -0.24, respectively.Moreover, the direct effect of normative identity style on religious commitment (0.47) was found to be significant. Conversely, the direct effects of avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles and commitment on religious commitment were not significant. Non-significant paths were consequently removed from the equation to improve the model fit. In all significant paths, the absolute values of t exceed ±1.96, indicating the significance of these paths. Sobel's test was employed to ascertain the significance of the relationship between the pattern of religious commitment based on attachment style and the mediation of family functioning. ResultIn this research, these two questions were addressed, revealing that avoidant and normative identity styles exert a reverse effect, while others have a direct impact on an individual's religious adherence. Additionally, the secure attachment style plays a direct and indirect role, mediated by family functioning, whereas avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles exhibit a negative and significant relationship solely through mediation by family functioning.Thus, it should be emphasized that the family serves as the most crucial foundation for fostering self-awareness and psychological well-being in individuals. When the family fulfills its function effectively, it enables the individuals it nurtures to experience inner peace, stemming from the family serving as a secure base where their emotional needs can be met. ReferencesAkbari, H. & Abdeyousefkhani, Z. (2014). Examining the relationship between religious commitment and life satisfaction. Educational research Journal, 10(43), 37-68. (In Persian)Ali Akbari Dehkordi, M., Agha Yousefi, A. & Aslami, E. (2012). Examining the relationship between happiness and religious orientation and personality. Psychological Studies, 10(2), 119-142. (In Persian)Ashnad, F., Rezaian Bilandi, H. & Ahmadi, M. R. (2019). The moderating role of religious orientation in the relationship between attachment styles and marital commitment. Islamic Studies of Women and Family, 7(13), 53-76. (In Persian)Askari, M., Heydari, A. & Asgari, P. (2015). The relationship between spiritual intelligence and religious orientation with psychological well-being and existential anxiety in college students. Research in Educational Systems, 9(31), 163-190. (In Persian)Aslani, K., Sayadi, A. & Aman Elahi, A. (2011). The relationship between attachment styles and family functions and general health. Family Counseling and Psychology Quarterly, 2(2), 163-177. (In Persian)Astrachan, J. H., Binz Astrachan, C., Campopiano, G. & Baù, M. (2020). Values, spirituality and religion: Family business and the roots of sustainable ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 163, 637-645.Atash Afroz, A., Azimi, K. & Amini, M. (2015). The relationship of spiritual intelligence and religious orientation with happiness Among students of Kharazmi University. Islam and Health of Journal, 2(3), 7-14.Azizi, N. & Soleimani, J. (2017). Examining the role of religious orientation in the mental health of high school students. Fiqh and Principles Quarterly, 1(1), 16-30. (In Persian)Bardel, M. & Badri Gregari, R. (2022). The effect of attachment styles and family functioning on forgiveness in secondary school students. Knowledge and research in applied psychology. (article ready for publication). (In Persian)Barkhordari, M., Saidi, M. S. & Hojat Khah, S. M. (2023). The causal model of marital intimacy based on attachment styles, self-compassion and mindfulness in romantic relationships of couples. Psychotherapy Culture and Counseling, 14(55), 69-90. (In Persian)Berzonsky, M. D. & Kuk, L. (2022). Identity styles and college adaptation: the mediational roles of commitment, self-agency and self-regulation. Identity, 22(4), 310-325.Berzonsky, M. D. (2008). Identity formation: The role of identity processing style and cognitive processes. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 645-655.Berzonsky, M. D., Branje, S. J. & Meeus, W. (2007). Identity-processing style, psychosocial resources, and adolescents' perceptions of parent-adolescent relations. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(3), 324-345.Berzonsky, M. D. & Neimeyer, G. J. (1988). Identity status and personal construct systems. Journal of Adolescence, 11(3), 195-204.Bretherton, J. (2013). The origins of attachment theory:: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759-775.Davodi Nejad, B., Albushoke, K., Kariminia, M. M. & Ansari Moghadam, M. (2022). Depression and its treatment methods according to the Holy Quran. New Developments in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Education, 5(50), 1-13. (In Persian)Dehhgani Tanha, B., Shahabizadeh, F. & Ayati, M. (2012). Family functioning and religious orientation. Psychology and Religion, 6(3), 81-95. (In Persian)Dunkel, C. S., Papini, D. R. & Berzonsky, M. D. (2008). Explaining differences in identity styles: Possible roles of personality and family functioning. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 8(4), 349-363.Erikson, E. H. (1964). Inner and outer space: Reflections on womanhood. Daedalus, 582-606.Garavand H. (2019). The role of internal and external religious orientations on the goals and aspirations of students' lives (Case study of students in Allameh Tabatabai University). Applied Issues in Islamic Education, 4(4), 137-166. (In Persian)Ghaibi, E., Soltani Manesh, M, R., Jafari Dezfouli, H., Zarif, F., Jafari, Z. & Gilani, Z. (2022). Comparison of marital satisfaction, emotional divorce and religious commitment among nurses and staff of Ahvaz Government Hospitals. Eurasian Journal of Chemical, Medicinal and Petroleum Research, 1(1), 33-39.Hassan, R. (2007). On being religious: Patterns of religious commitment in Muslim societies. The Muslim World, 97(3), 437-478.Heydari, H., Karimian N. & Salari, S. (2014). Examination of the relationship between fear of intimacy and identity styles and marital commitment of married couples. Family Research, 11(41), 73-86. (In Persian)Hossein Sharqi, A. & Mirhashmi, M. (2015). The correlation identity styles and religious orientation with university students' general health. Cognitive and Behavioral Science Research, 6(1), 77-90. (In Persian)Imani, S., Baghbani Nader, M., Hosseinzadeh Oskooi, A. & Noroozi Dashtaki, M. (2021). Investigating the mediating role of gratitude in the relationship between religious orientation and marital satisfaction. Rooyesh Psychology, 10(5), 1-12. (In Persian)Janbozorgi, M. (2007) Religious orientation and mental health. Research in Medicine, 31(4), 345-350. (In Persian)Janbozorgi, M. (2010). Construction and validity of religious adherence test on the basis of the statements of Quran and Nahjul Balaghah. Studies in Islam and Psychology, 3(5), 79-105. (In Persian)Kalantar Hormazi, A., Talkoee, S. & Moradi, G. (2015). Predicting psychological resiliency based on the level of religious affiliation in married women. Clinical Psychology Studies, 5(19), 119-138. (In Persian)Khayat, E., Attari, Y. & Koraei, A. )2018(. Relationship between attachment styles and maladaptive schemas with tendency to infidelity: Moderating role of religious commitment. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences, 16(4), 440-452. (In Persian)Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Smits, I. & Goossens, L. (2008). Capturing ruminative exploration: Extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 58-82.Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. Handbook of adolescent psychology, 9(11), 159-187.Memarian, E and Manavipour, D and Sedaghati Fard, M. (2022). Explain the relationship between attachment styles and epistemological beliefs with empathy in students. Educational Leadership & administration, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar branch, 16 )1(, 27-55. (In Persian)Mirhosseini, S. H., Nouhi, S., Janbozorgi, M., Mohajer, H. & Naseryfadafan, M. (2019). The role of spiritual health and religious coping in predicting death anxiety among patients with Coronavirus. Islamic Studies and Psychology, 14(26), 29-42. (In Persian)Mortazavi, K. & Saidi, Z. (2017). The relationship between religious orientation and happiness and mental health in students. Nasim Tossansi Quarterly, 5(3), 62-68. (In Persian)Motahari Moayed, V., Jian Bagheri, M., Peyvandi, P., Bliad, M. R. & Hossienzadeh Taghvaei, M. (2023). Family functioning based on religious orientation with the mediation of forgiveness in working men and women in Hamedan. Rooyesh, 12(5), 97-108. (In Persian)Mousavi, S. J., Noori, N. & Jodeir, J. (2017). The relationship of religious commitment and identity styles with family efficiency. Islam & Psychological Research, 3(1), 47-66. (In Persian)Pakdaman, S. (2001). Investigating the Relationship Between Attachment and Sociability in Adolescence. Ph.D Thesis in Psychology, University of Tehran). (In Persian)Peykani, J., Sure, K. & Safari, A. (2023). The nature of faith from a metaphorical point of view in cognitive sciences. Metaphysical Investigations, 6(3), 139-162. (In Persian)Radi, H., Mashayekhi, S. & Nouri, N. (2012). Investigating the relationship between Islamic optimism, depression and stress coping styles of students. Psychology and Religion, 6(1), 29-44. (In Persian)Ramazanian, A., Ahmadi Saadi, A. & Mokhtari, A. (2022). Examining the relationship between faith and action and its impact on mental health from the perspective of the Quran. Quran and Medicine, 7(3), 70-80. (In Persian)Rasouli, A. & Kehrizi, Z. (2019). The prediction of family function based on relationship among married student attachment styles, religious and marital compatibility. The Islamic Journal of Women and Family, 8(20), 57-74. (In Persian)Safurai Parizi, M/. M. (2013). The indexef of efficient family. The Islamic Journal of Women and the Family, 1(1), 58-29. (In Persian)Sayadi Touranlou, H., Jamali, R. & Mirghafouri, H. (2006). Investigating the relationship between beliefs in religious teachings of Islam and students' emotional intelligence. New Religious Thought Quarterly, 3(11), 145-172. (In Persian)Schwartz, S. J., Luyckx, K. & Vignoles, V. L. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer Science & Business Media.Schwartz, S. J., Mullis, R. L., Waterman, A. S. & Dunham, R. M. (2000). Ego identity status, identity style, and personal expressiveness: An empirical investigation of three convergent constructs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(4), 504-521.Sedighi Arfaee, F., Ganji, M., Yazdani Varzaneh, M. & Nadi Randi, M. (2021). The relationship between Identity styles with religious orientation among the students of Kashan University. Applied Sociology, 32(81), 1-22. (In Persian)Shakiba Rad, A., Saberi, H. & Sabet, M. (2023). Investigating attachment styles and identity styles in immigrant and non-immigrant groups in Tehran. Journal of Psychological Science, 22(126), 1137-1150. (In Persian)Smith, C. (2017). Religion: What it is, how it works, and why it matters. Princeton University Press.Smits, I., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., Duriez, B., Berzonsky, M. & Goossens, L. (2008). Perceived parenting dimensions and identity styles: Exploring the socialization of adolescents’ processing of identity-relevant information. Journal of Adolescence, 31(2), 151-164Solgi, M., Heidari, H., Saleh Sadaghpour, B. & Aghapour, E. (2019). Investigating the relationship between national dimension of individual identity and individual differentiation by communicating communicative mediation and social identity cycle. Journal of Counseling Research, 18(70), 161-178. (In Persian)Tabatabainejad, S. (2016). Strategies and obstacles for developing a faith attitude in the Holy Quran; Based on the cognitive dissonance model in social psychology. Quran and Science Studies, 1(2), 37-64. (In Persian)