Search

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has significantly advanced in treating B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and has shown efficacy in managing relapsed B-ALL after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Donor-derived CAR-T cell offer both high efficacy and rapid response. Although promising results exist, current research lacks definitive evidence of long-term survival benefits for patients treated with donor-derived CAR-T therapy. We report the long-term survival of 32 patients with post-transplant relapsed B-ALL treated with donor-derived CD19 CAR-T cell, achieving either complete Remission (CR) or CR with incomplete peripheral blood recovery (CRi). The median follow-up was 42 months, with 2-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates of 56.25% and 50.0%, respectively. The 5-year OS and EFS rates were 53.13% and 46.88%, with no new long-term adverse events observed. These findings demonstrate good long-term safety, supporting donor-derived CAR-T cell as a recommended treatment option for relapsed B-ALL patients post-transplantation. Trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=14315. Registration number: ChiCTR-OOC-16008447. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare and heterogeneous lymphoproliferative disorder that lacks standardised treatment options for patients with refractory or relapsed (r/r) disease. Blocking Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for iMCD without depleting B cells. This single‐centre, retrospective study enrolled 10 patients with r/r iMCD who were treated with orelabrutinib, a novel, next‐generation BTK inhibitor. The median age at orelabrutinib initiation was 48 (range: 31–58) years. The overall response rate was 70% (7/10 patients, 95% CI: 34.8–93.3), with 20% (n = 2) achieving complete response and 50% (n = 5) achieving partial response. The median time to response was 9.8 (range: 5.9–20.5) months. Patients in the non‐responder group also demonstrated a continuous improvement in haemoglobin (91–105 g/L) and albumin (32–38 g/L) levels at month 12 of treatment despite not fulfilling response criteria. No grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred during the median time to the next treatment of 29.0 (range: 15.0–36.2) months. No patient mortality was recorded during the median follow‐up duration of 32.8 (range: 15.0–36.9) months. In conclusion, orelabrutinib is a safe and effective regimen for r/r iMCD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computer tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Fifty-one consecutive patients with relapsed MM were enrolled in this retrospective study. 18F-FDG parameters based on the Italian Myeloma Criteria for PET Use (IMPeTUs) and clinical data were analyzed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The Cox proportional risk model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for survival analysis. The median length of follow-up was 20 months (IQR, 5–29 months), the median PFS for the entire cohort was 8 months (IQR, 3–17 months) and the median OS was 21 months (IQR, 8–49 months). Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that the Deauville score of BM > 3 [HR 2.900, 95% CI (1.011, 8.319), P = 0.048] and the presence of EMD [HR 3.134, 95% CI (1.245, 7.891), P = 0.015] were independent predictors of poor PFS. The presence of EMD [HR 12.777, 95% CI (1.825, 89.461), P = 0.010] and the reduced platelets count [HR 7.948, 95% CI (1.236, 51.099), P = 0.029] were adversely associated with OS. 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters based on IMPeTUs have prognostic significance in patients with relapsed MM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of elderly patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) poses significant challenges. Currently, one promising strategy in therapeutic interventions for geriatric individuals revolves around the utilization of small molecule targeted drugs either independently or in conjunction with demethylating agents. In this report, we present the successful attainment of complete remission in an elderly female patient with relapsed AML, the patient underwent treatment with a combination of Selinexor, decitabine, and a halfdose CAG regimen for two cycles. Subsequently, the patient has sustained this remission through consolidation therapy involving a medium dose of Ara-c. This therapeutic regimen has demonstrated favorable outcomes in the management of relapsed AML in elderly individuals. Furthermore, the adverse reactions were manageable. In order to devise an efficacious treatment regimen for elderly patients suffering from relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia, it is imperative to incorporate a larger cohort of cases for clinical investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma (NB), the limited efficacy of conventional chemotherapies necessitates the exploration of new treatment options. Previous studies have highlighted the anti-tumor properties of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in high-risk NB (HR-NB). This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of ATO combined with salvage chemotherapy regimens, featuring cyclophosphamide and topotecan, as a foundational treatment for children with relapsed or refractory NB. Eleven patients (four relapsed, seven refractory NB) were retrospectively analyzed for efficacy and treatment relevance. Salvage treatments, incorporating ATO (0.18 mg/kg daily for 8 h intravenously on days 1 to 10), were administered upon disease progression or relapse, with assessments conducted every two cycles. Treatments had 63.6% efficacy, with six cases of partial response, one case of stable disease, and four cases of disease progression. The overall response rate was 54.5%, and the disease control rate was 63.6%. Importantly, the systemic toxicity experienced by patients following salvage chemotherapy with ATO was mild. Salvage chemotherapy regimens featuring ATO demonstrated potential for prolonging disease stabilization for relapsed or refractory HR-NB patients, exhibiting both favorable efficacy and safety profiles. This suggests further clinical exploration and promotion of this therapeutic approach in the treatment of NB. Clinical perspectives summary: Point 1. The inadequate effectiveness of traditional chemotherapy in individuals with recurrent or resistant neuroblastoma (NB) necessitates the investigation of novel therapeutic approaches. Point 2. Arsenic trioxide (ATO)-based salvage treatments are both effective and less toxic in relapsed or refractory NB. Point 3. Salvage chemotherapy regimens incorporating ATO have shown promise in extending disease stabilization in relapsed or refractory high-risk NB patients, with favorable efficacy and safety profiles, which suggests further clinical exploration and promotion of this therapeutic approach in the treatment of NB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusions The prognosis of patients with refractory or relapsed AML (R/R‐AML) is very limited. To (re)achieve complete remission, there has recently been increasing evidence that the combination of venetoclax (VEN) with chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes.Our retrospective, single‐center study of 53 R/R‐AML patients with a median follow‐up time of 11.0 months compared standard salvage chemotherapy (FLAG‐Ida or HAM in n = 35 patients) with a combination of venetoclax (VEN) and FLAG‐Ida (FLAVIDA in n = 18 patients) concerning safety and efficacy.Regarding the primary endpoints, there was a statistically significant increased event free survival (EFS) in the FLAVIDA group compared to patients with standard chemotherapy based on the univariate log‐rank‐test and in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05, 0.97]). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of patients developing febrile neutropenia CTCAE III° and IV° or a delay in hematological recovery. In addition, a clear trend towards an improved overall response rate (78% vs. 51%) was demonstrated in the FLAVIDA group.The FLAVIDA regimen represents a promising treatment alternative for R/R AML patients with a high response rate and significantly improved EFS compared to standard chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has significantly advanced in treating B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and has shown efficacy in managing relapsed B-ALL after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Donor-derived CAR-T cell offer both high efficacy and rapid response. Although promising results exist, current research lacks definitive evidence of long-term survival benefits for patients treated with donor-derived CAR-T therapy. We report the long-term survival of 32 patients with post-transplant relapsed B-ALL treated with donor-derived CD19 CAR-T cell, achieving either complete Remission (CR) or CR with incomplete peripheral blood recovery (CRi). The median follow-up was 42 months, with 2-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates of 56.25% and 50.0%, respectively. The 5-year OS and EFS rates were 53.13% and 46.88%, with no new long-term adverse events observed. These findings demonstrate good long-term safety, supporting donor-derived CAR-T cell as a recommended treatment option for relapsed B-ALL patients post-transplantation. Trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=14315 . Registration number: ChiCTR-OOC-16008447.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a specific subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which occurs more frequently in young women. PMBCL is an uncommon kind of cancer. R-EPOCH is a common therapeutic regimen that is suitable for patients with PMBCL, and could get a relatively high complete remission rate. However, it may not be effective response in patients with relapsed PMBCL. Immunotherapy appears to be helpful in recent years. Therefore, in this case, a 31-year-old female patient with relapsed PMBCL. Progressive disease was identified after rechemotherapy and target therapy, complete remission can be achieved after switching to PD-1 inhibitor plus targeted therapy. These recurrence, progression, remission and follow-up are all displayed well on 18F-FDG PET/CT. This case with consecutive imaging monitor illustrates that PD-1 inhibitor may be used as a first-line treatment for recurrent PMBCL. In addition, 18F-FDG PET/CT is strongly recommended for monitoring PMBCL include baseline staging, interim response and follow-up study.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and understanding of follicular lymphoma (FL) pathogenesis have had a significant impact on therapeutic tactics. The life expectancy of patients has increased significantly. Currently, the 5-year overall survival of FL patients achieved 90 %, and its median is approaching 20 years. However, FL remains an incurable disease with periods of remission and relapse, requiring multiple therapy courses throughout the patient’s life.The main problem is the treatment of patients with refractory/relapsed forms, especially after 3rd line of therapy, as well as with a primarily resistant course and early (in the first 2 years) relapses. Therefore, despite the indolent FL course in most patients, there remains a need for new drugs that can ensure increased treatment efficacy with minimal toxicity and simultaneously maintain a high quality of life, mainly in the presence of primary refractoriness, early progression and in later lines of therapy. In recent years, new targeted drugs have been studied – phosphoinositide 3-kinase, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors, as well as immunological drugs (CAR-T therapy (CAR – chimeric antigen receptor) and bispecific antibodies).The article presents the possibilities of treatment for refractory/relapsed FL as 3rd and subsequent therapy lines.

Abstract In patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma (NB), the limited efficacy of conventional chemotherapies necessitates the exploration of new treatment options. Previous studies have highlighted the anti-tumor properties of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in high-risk NB (HR-NB). This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of ATO combined with salvage chemotherapy regimens, featuring cyclophosphamide and topotecan, as a foundational treatment for children with relapsed or refractory NB. Eleven patients (four relapsed, seven refractory NB) were retrospectively analyzed for efficacy and treatment relevance. Salvage treatments, incorporating ATO (0.18 mg/kg daily for 8 h intravenously on days 1 to 10), were administered upon disease progression or relapse, with assessments conducted every two cycles. Treatments had 63.6% efficacy, with six cases of partial response, one case of stable disease, and four cases of disease progression. The overall response rate was 54.5%, and the disease control rate was 63.6%. Importantly, the systemic toxicity experienced by patients following salvage chemotherapy with ATO was mild. Salvage chemotherapy regimens featuring ATO demonstrated potential for prolonging disease stabilization for relapsed or refractory HR-NB patients, exhibiting both favorable efficacy and safety profiles. This suggests further clinical exploration and promotion of this therapeutic approach in the treatment of NB.

Simple Summary: The chemotherapy combination rituximab, gemcitabine, and dexamethasone (R-GDP), followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, is one of the standards of care for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R NHL). Complete metabolic response before transplantation is the most important prognosis factor for a long duration of remission. Selinexor is an oral, selective inhibitor of the nuclear export compound (XPO1). For heavily pretreated patients with DLBCL, the single drug selinexor has previously shown an overall response rate of 29%. In this study, we evaluated selinexor in combination with RGDP for patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma. The results from our phase I clinical study indicate that weekly selinexor plus RGDP has a generally tolerable safety profile and durable efficacy in R/R B-NHL. Purpose: Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of exportine-1 (XPO1) with efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We conducted a study investigating the combination of selinexor with rituximab and platinum-based chemotherapy in B-cell lymphoma. Patients and methods: We conducted a phase 1b, dose-escalation, and expansion trial, which enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients received oral selinexor according to a 3 + 3 design in combination with rituximab and dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, oxaliplatine (DHAOX) or gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) chemotherapy. Results: A total of 39 patients were enrolled, 27 during the escalation phase and 12 during the expansion phase. Most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 77%). Group R-DHAOX was prematurely closed to inclusion due to a recommendation from the French drug agency, independent of this trial. A recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of selinexor in association with R-GPD was established at 40 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle. In a population of 18 patients treated at this dose of selinexor, the most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were hematological. With this regimen, seven obtained a complete metabolic response and five a partial response. The median PFS was 5.8 months. Conclusions: Among the patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma, selinexor at a weekly dose of 40 mg with R-GDP is feasible for outpatients, with a generally acceptable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modern immunochemotherapy protocols allow 60-70% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients to be cured by first-line therapy. Those with primary resistance or early relapse have a poor prognosis, and classical salvage regimens are effective in less than 20% of these patients. Targeted chemotherapy and immunotherapy protocols are considered the current standard of care. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are regarded as the two most effective methods. Epcoritamab and glofitamab are novel BsAbs approved for the treatment of DLBCL after two lines of systemic therapy. Their high efficacy and safety have been confirmed in phase II multicenter studies. BsAbs are an alternative to CAR-T cell therapy in patients who do not qualify for it or who cannot wait for CAR-T cell preparation due to rapidly progressing disease. Although BsAbs are approved as monotherapy, combinations with chemotherapy and immunomodulatory agents are being explored in ongoing clinical studies. The high efficacy of BsAbs has prompted further research into their potential role in earlier lines of treatment, including first line and debulking before CAR-T cell therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives and Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to analyze the safety and efficacy of DPd versus DKd in daratumumab naïve RRMM patients treated in real‐world practice. Results: A total of 187 patients with RRMM were included in the analysis; 128 patients received DPd, and 59 patients received DKd. A vast majority (80%) of patients had lenalidomide refractory disease and nearly 50% had bortezomib refractory disease. The overall response and complete response rates were 76% and 34% in the DPd group versus 80% and 51% in the DKd group, respectively. With a median follow up of 36 months for the entire patient population, median PFS and OS in the DPd versus DKd groups were 12, 12, 37, and 35 months, respectively. The most common grade 3+ adverse events in the DPd versus DKd groups were neutropenia (32% vs. 7%), anemia (14% vs. 10%), thrombocytopenia (13% vs. 15%), and cardiovascular events (4% vs. 15%), respectively. Both DPd and DKd appeared to be a safe and effective treatment options for RRMM. Conclusions: While there were more cytopenias associated with DPd and more cardiovascular side effects with DKd, there were no significant differences in the survival outcomes with these two regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Decitabine (DAC), a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, has shown efficacy combined with chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults, but less is known about its efficacy in children. Accordingly, we conducted a study which involved a priming regimen consisting of DAC with cladribine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-stimulating factor (DAC-CLAG) and compared the efficacy and safety of this regimen with CLAG alone. Methods A total of 39 R/R AML children who received the CLAG or DAC-CLAG regimen in Shanghai Children’s Hospital were retrospectively enrolled in this non-randomized study. These regimens were studied sequentially over time. Twenty-two patients received CLAG from 2015, while 17 patients were administered epigenetic priming with DAC before CLAG from 2020. Patients were subsequently bridged to stem cell transplantation (SCT) or consolidation chemotherapy. Complete remission (CR) and adverse effects were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test, and survival was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Results DAC-CLAG conferred a numerically higher CR compared to CLAG (70.59% vs 63.64%; P = 0.740). High CR rates occurred in patients with good cytogenetics (P = 0.029) and prior induction without cladribine (P = 0.099). The 1-year event-free survival (EFS) was 64.71% ± 11.59% and 63.31% ± 10.35% in the DAC-CLAG and CLAG group (P = 0.595), and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 81.45% ± 9.72% and 77.01% ± 9.04%, respectively (P = 0.265). The 1-year OS and EFS after SCT were higher in the DAC-CLAG than in the CLAG cohort (100% vs 92.31% ± 7.39%, P = 0.072; 92.31% ± 7.39% vs 85.71% ± 9.35%, P = 0.158). Univariate analysis revealed that a good prognosis included good cytogenetics (P = 0.002), non-complex karyotype (P = 0.056), CR on reinduction (P

Background: Approximately 10%–30% of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) experience relapse or refractory (R/R) disease after first-line standard therapy. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have important roles in the salvage treatment of R/R HL. However, subsequent treatment for HL refractory to BV and/or ICI treatment is challenging. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients in two institutions who had R/R HL, experienced BV or ICI treatment failure, and received radiotherapy (RT) thereafter. The overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: Overall, 19 patients were enrolled. First-line systemic therapy comprised doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD, 84.2%); AVD plus ICIs (10.5%); and bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP, 5.3%). After first-line therapy, 15 (78.9%) and four patients (21.1%) had refractory disease and relapsed, respectively. After R/R HL diagnosis, six (31.6%), two (10.5%), and 11 (57.9%) patients received BV and ICIs concurrently, BV monotherapy, and ICI monotherapy, respectively. All patients received intensity-modulated RT (n = 12, 63.2%) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; n = 7, 36.8%). The ORR as well as the complete response (CR) rate was 100%; the median DOR to RT was 17.2 months (range, 7.9–46.7 months). Two patients showed progression outside the radiation field; one patient had extensive in-field, out-of-field, nodal, and extranodal relapse. With a median follow-up time of 16.2 months (range, 9.2–23.2 months), the 1-year PFS and OS were 84.4% and 100%, respectively. PFS was associated with extranodal involvement (P = 0.019) and gross tumor volume (P = 0.044). All patients tolerated RT well without adverse events of grade ≥ 3. Conclusion: RT is effective and safe for treating HL refractory to BV or ICIs and has the potential to be part of a comprehensive strategy for HL.

Background: Decitabine (DAC), a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, has shown efficacy combined with chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults, but less is known about its efficacy in children. Accordingly, we conducted a study which involved a priming regimen consisting of DAC with cladribine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-stimulating factor (DAC-CLAG) and compared the efficacy and safety of this regimen with CLAG alone. Methods: A total of 39 R/R AML children who received the CLAG or DAC-CLAG regimen in Shanghai Children's Hospital were retrospectively enrolled in this non-randomized study. These regimens were studied sequentially over time. Twenty-two patients received CLAG from 2015, while 17 patients were administered epigenetic priming with DAC before CLAG from 2020. Patients were subsequently bridged to stem cell transplantation (SCT) or consolidation chemotherapy. Complete remission (CR) and adverse effects were analyzed by Fisher's exact test, and survival was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: DAC-CLAG conferred a numerically higher CR compared to CLAG (70.59% vs 63.64%; P = 0.740). High CR rates occurred in patients with good cytogenetics (P = 0.029) and prior induction without cladribine (P = 0.099). The 1-year event-free survival (EFS) was 64.71% ± 11.59% and 63.31% ± 10.35% in the DAC-CLAG and CLAG group (P = 0.595), and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 81.45% ± 9.72% and 77.01% ± 9.04%, respectively (P = 0.265). The 1-year OS and EFS after SCT were higher in the DAC-CLAG than in the CLAG cohort (100% vs 92.31% ± 7.39%, P = 0.072; 92.31% ± 7.39% vs 85.71% ± 9.35%, P = 0.158). Univariate analysis revealed that a good prognosis included good cytogenetics (P = 0.002), non-complex karyotype (P = 0.056), CR on reinduction (P < 0.0001), and bridging to SCT (P = 0.0007). Use of a hypomethylating agent (P = 0.049) and bridging to SCT (P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity and infection were the main adverse events. Conclusions: DAC prior to the CLAG regimen improved remission in pediatric R/R AML, and was feasible and well tolerated. CLAG ± DAC as a salvage therapy prior to SCT induced improved survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-O) is frequently administered off-label in relapsed/refractory (r/r) CLL/SLL where venetoclax-rituximab is the approved regimen. We conducted this retrospective, real-world study to evaluate Ven-O in r/r CLL/SLL. Between 7/2019 and 6/2022, 40 patients with r/r CLL/SLL on Ven-O were included. The median age was 72, 28.2% had TP53 mutation and/or 17p deletion, median number of prior therapies was 1 (range, 1–6), and 55% had prior BTK inhibitor exposure. The overall response rate was 90% (complete response [CR] or CR with incomplete marrow recovery in 27.5% and partial response in 62.5%) of patients, and the 2-year progression-free survival was 81.2% (95% CI, 69.5–94.8). Therapy was well tolerated. No laboratory or clinical TLS occurred with venetoclax (Howard criteria). One (3%) patient experienced laboratory TLS with obinutuzumab initiation. In summary, this retrospective cohort study demonstrated that Ven-O achieves frequent, durable responses and can be safely administered in r/r CLL/SLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care treatment in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (rrHL). Published long-term follow-up data concerning this modality from the Indian subcontinent is lacking. In this retrospective study, the data on adults (> 16 years) with biopsy-confirmed rrHL who were autografted from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021 at our transplant unit were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from transplant to disease progression or death due to any cause. Overall survival (OS) was determined from date of transplant to date of death due to any cause. Overall, 134 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma underwent ASCT. At a median follow-up of 38.2 (range, 0.1–240) months, 5 years PFS was 45.3% (95% CI 35.4–54.4). The probability of OS at 5 years was 60.5% (95% CI 49.6–69.6). Eleven (8.2%) patients suffered transplant-related mortality by 100 days. Post-transplant persistent disease, pre-transplant serum hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 g/dl) and chemo-resistance (< PR after last salvage regimen) of tumour at transplant were independent prognostic factors associated with worse PFS in multivariable analysis. Likewise, age ≥ 30 years, ECOG performance status ≥ 1 and residual disease after transplantation correlated with inferior OS. Long-term outcomes of rrHL patients undergoing ASCT in India match those from the developed world in the era of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Pre-transplant performance status, chemo-sensitivity of disease, serum albumin and post-transplant remission status determined survival in our cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma today can expect to live for substantially longer than in the past thanks to the range of highly active treatment options now available. Over the course of their disease, patients may receive several different treatment combinations to keep their disease under control. Thus, there is an ongoing need for additional new drugs and regimens to be developed, and, in particular, ones that are convenient, accessible, and active against disease that has returned following multiple different therapies. Among today's standards of care are the immunomodulatory drugs lenalidomide and pomalidomide, which are commonly used in quadruplet and triplet regimens in newly diagnosed patients and those with relapsed disease. However, resistance to these drugs can arise over the course of treatment; therefore, novel, more potent agents are being developed to restore and increase activity against relapsed multiple myeloma, one of which is the investigational agent mezigdomide. Mezigomide is an oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD) that is under clinical investigation in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). Like other CELMoD compounds, mezigdomide acts by altering the conformation of cereblon within the cullin 4A ring ligase–cereblon (CRL4CRBN) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, thereby recruiting novel protein substrates for selective proteasomal degradation. These include two critical lymphoid transcription factors, Ikaros family zinc finger proteins 1 and 3 (IKZF1 and IKZF3), also known as Ikaros and Aiolos, which have important roles in the development and differentiation of hematopoietic cells, in MM pathobiology, and in suppressing the expression of interferon-stimulating genes and T-cell stimulation. Among the CELMoDs, mezigdomide has the greatest cereblon-binding potency, plus the greatest potency for the degradation of Ikaros and Aiolos and subsequent downstream antimyeloma effects. Preclinical studies of mezigdomide have demonstrated its anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects in MM, along with its immune-stimulatory effects and its synergistic activity with other antimyeloma agents, including in lenalidomide-/pomalidomide-resistant MM cell lines and mouse xenograft models. Early-phase clinical trial data indicate notable activity in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM, including those with triple-class-refractory disease, together with a tolerable and manageable safety profile. This review summarizes current preclinical and clinical findings with mezigdomide and its potential future roles in the treatment of MM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Currently, there is no effective treatment for refractory/relapsed (R/R) autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA), associated with poor quality of life. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors have begun to be used in some autoimmune diseases. We initiated the clinical trial of orelabrutinib treatment on R/R AIHA/Evans Syndrome, which is in progress. The preliminary results showed that nine of the 12 enrolled patients responded to orelabrutinib treatment. Here, we reported three cases who have completed the treatment and were followed up for 6 months, achieving complete or partial remission. Orelabrutinib is expected to become a new second‐line treatment for R/R AIHA/Evans syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes and resistance to therapy. The addition of venetoclax, a BCL-2 antagonist, to lower-intensity therapies results in improved survival in the first-line setting compared to monotherapy with a hypomethylating agent or low-dose cytarabine. Despite this, much remains unknown about the performance of venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent following the first-line setting. Additionally, while the ELN 2022 guidelines appear to improve the prognostication of AML, clarification is needed to determine how the revision applies to lower-intensity strategies. To investigate this, we retrospectively analyzed the performance of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in relapsed or refractory AML under the ELN 2022 guidelines. We demonstrated that the ELN 2022 revision is not optimized for lower-intensity venetoclax-based strategies. To refine the prognostication schema, we showed significantly improved response and survival benefits for patients with mutated NPM1 and IDH. Relatively, patients with mutated NRAS, KRAS, and FLT3-ITD were associated with inferior response and survival. Furthermore, there is an unmet clinical need for tools to improve the selection of lower-intensity therapy candidates with borderline functional status. Using an incremental survival computation method, we discovered that a CCI score threshold of 5 distinguishes patients at an elevated risk of death. Together, these novel findings highlight areas of refinement to improve survival in relapsed or refractory AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Rituximab and lenalidomide is a preferred option for relapsed indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Obinutuzumab may be a superior combination partner with lenalidomide given enhanced antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis compared to rituximab. Our aim was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and activity of lenalidomide in combination with fixed dose of obinutuzumab in relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory WHO Grade 1–3A follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and small lymphocytic lymphoma and adequate performance status (ECOG 0–2) at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. We excluded patients with evidence of ongoing transformation to aggressive lymphoma. During phase 1, 1000 mg intravenous obinutuzumab was administered with three predefined levels of oral lenalidomide in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to establish lenalidomide 20 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. During phase 2, patients received induction therapy with six 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 20 mg with intravenous obinutuzumab 1000 mg. In accordance with our prior experience with lenalidomide plus rituximab, patients who were responding to the combination could receive up to 6 additional cycles (up to 12 cycles in total) of combination therapy. Dosing of obinutuzumab was continued in all responding patients after cycle 6 every 2 months for a total of 30 months from the start of therapy. The decision of number of cycles of combination therapy beyond 6 was at discretion of the investigator and was included to allow individualisation of therapy to maximise response while minimising exposure. The co-primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and overall response, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete or partial response in relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the end of induction therapy, according to Cheson and colleagues (2007 criteria). The secondary endpoints were complete response after induction therapy and time to event endpoints including time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Analyses were intent to treat in the efficacy cohort and per-treated in the safety population in all patients who received at least one dose of either investigational agent. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01995669. Findings: Between June 03, 2014, and 07 March 2019, we completed planned enrolment, and 66 patients started therapy including 9 patients in phase 1 and 57 patients in phase 2. All patients were evaluated for safety and the 60 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide 20 mg were evaluable for activity. Grade 3–4 haematological toxicities included neutropenia 21% (14/66) and thrombocytopenia 11% (7/66) with no cases of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3–4 non-haematological toxicities included lung infection 8% (5/66), fatigue 8% (5/66) and rash 6% (4/66). By Cheson 2007 criteria, 90% (54/60, 95% CI: 79–96) achieved an overall response at the end of induction meeting the prespecified activity endpoint. Complete responses were seen in 33% (20/60, 95% CI: 22–47) at the end of induction. Median progression free survival, time to progression and overall survival have not been reached after median follow-up of 41.7 months. Estimated 4-year progression free survival rates were 55% (95% CI: 42–73), time to progression of 56% (95% CI: 43–74) and overall survival of 84% (95% CI: 74–95). Interpretation: Our findings suggest that oral lenalidomide with obinutuzumab is safe and highly active in patients with relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is associated with prolonged remission duration. The study is limited by the lack of a control arm leading to cross-trial comparisons to evaluate activity. Future randomised trials comparing this regime to rituximab and lenalidomide are warranted. Funding: Genentech and an MD Anderson Core grant.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has been confirmed improving remission rates in refractory patients or relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, the added benefits of undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) following CAR-T therapy remain a subject of debate. In this research we investigated the efficiency and long-term outcomes of CD19 CAR-T bridging with allo-HSCT in R/R B-ALL patients. A total of 42 patients were brought into the cohort studies. Our findings revealed that patients who appected CAR-T followed by HSCT had a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 70 % and a 1-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate of 95 %. Moreover, patients who underwent this combined treatment had higher OS and LFS rates compared to those who received CAR-T therapy alone. In conclusion, the results of this clinical trial provide compelling evidence for the safety and efficacy of using CAR-T therapy as a bridging strategy to allo-HSCT in patients with R/R B-ALL.

Abstract Background Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective and available local treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, the value of hypofractionated RT in this setting has not been confirmed. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma who received hypofractionated RT between January 2020 and August 2022 at a single institution. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and acute side effects were analyzed. Results A total of 30 patients were included. The median dose for residual disease was 36 Gy, at a dose per fraction of 2.3–5 Gy. After RT, the ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 90% and 80%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 2–27 months), 10 patients (33.3%) experienced disease progression and three died. The 1-year OS and PFS rates for all patients were 81.8% and 66.3%, respectively. The majority (8/10) of post-RT progressions involved out-of-field relapses. Patients with relapsed diseases, no response to systemic therapy, multiple lesions at the time of RT, and no response to RT were associated with out-of-field relapses. PFS was associated with response to RT (P = 0.001) and numbers of residual sites (P

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounts for 25% of all leukemia diagnosis and is characterized by distinct cytogenetic and molecular profile. Advances in the understanding of the causative driver mutations, risk-based therapy and better supportive care have led to an overall improvement in survival with frontline therapy. Despite these improvements, a significant number fail either because of primary refractory disease to the conventional 7+3 combination of anthracyclines and cytosine arabinoside (Cytarabine; Ara-C) or experience relapse post remission. Salvage therapy is complicated by the cardiotoxicity driven limitations on the reuse of anthracyclines and development of resistance to cytarabine. In this chapter authors will review the recent studies with targeted agents for refractory AML including targets for immunotherapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Primary resistance of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to the conventional 3 + 7 intensive chemotherapy and relapses after first-line chemotherapy are two highly challenging clinical scenarios. In these cases, when allogeneic stem cell transplantation is feasible, patients are usually retreated with other chemotherapeutic regimens, as transplantation is still considered, nowadays, the only curative option. Methods. We discuss the mechanisms behind resistance to chemotherapy and offer a comprehensive review on current treatments of refractory/relapsed AML with a focus on novel approaches incorporating the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax. Results. Alas, complete remission rates after salvage chemotherapy remain relatively low, between 30 and 60% at best. More recently, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax was combined either with hypomethylating agents or chemotherapy in refractory/relapsed patients. In particular, its combination with chemotherapy offered promising results by achieving higher rates of remission and bridging a substantial number of patients to transplantation. Conclusions. Venetoclax-based approaches might become, in the near future, the new standard of care for refractory/relapsed AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective and available local treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, the value of hypofractionated RT in this setting has not been confirmed. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma who received hypofractionated RT between January 2020 and August 2022 at a single institution. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and acute side effects were analyzed. Results: A total of 30 patients were included. The median dose for residual disease was 36 Gy, at a dose per fraction of 2.3–5 Gy. After RT, the ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 90% and 80%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 2–27 months), 10 patients (33.3%) experienced disease progression and three died. The 1-year OS and PFS rates for all patients were 81.8% and 66.3%, respectively. The majority (8/10) of post-RT progressions involved out-of-field relapses. Patients with relapsed diseases, no response to systemic therapy, multiple lesions at the time of RT, and no response to RT were associated with out-of-field relapses. PFS was associated with response to RT (P = 0.001) and numbers of residual sites (P < 0.001). No serious non-hematological adverse effects (≥ grade 3) associated with RT were reported. Conclusion: These data suggest that hypofractionated RT was effective and tolerable for patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma, especially for those that exhibited localized residual disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy has transformed the treatment approach for pediatric patients suffering from relapsed/refractory B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL). However, there was a paucity of data on the challenges associated with second‐round CAR‐T therapy in this population. Methods: Medical records of nine pediatric patients who received second‐round CAR‐T therapy in a single center from June 2019 to May 2023 were analyzed. Throughout the course of the clinical trial, we evaluated adverse events including CRS, CRES, infections, hematologic toxicity, and organ injury, as well as CAR‐T responses. Results: Except for one patient who chose CART therapy due to testicular relapse, the remaining patients had indications for CAR‐T therapy due to relapse with bone marrow alone or combined with other site. There were no difference between the transfusion dose of CART1 and CART2. No differences of incidence and grade of CRS was found between the first‐round CAR‐T therapy (CART1) and second‐round CAR‐T therapy (CART2). Additionally, we found that the incidence of CRES was higher for CART1(3/9,33.3%) than CART2(1/9,11.1%). Our findings revealed that there were no differences of IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐6, IL‐10, IFN‐γ, and TNF‐α between CART1 and CART2, but the peak level of IL‐17A was significantly higher in patients receiving CART1 compared to those receiving CART2 (p =.011). Early and late infection rates after CART1 were higher than CART2. Based on the dynamic changes of ANC, hemoglobin and platelet, ANC, and platelet were reduced obviously post CART. It seems that the incidences of severe thrombocytopenia and severe anemia were higher in the CART1 group compared to CART2. The MRD‐negative CR rates for CART1 and CART2 are 100% and 44.4%, respectively (p =.029). All patients experienced events (relapse, chemotherapy, transplantation, or death) after receiving CART2, including one died, three discharged automatically, and the remaining five patients survived. Conclusion: Although the remission rate of CART2 is not as high as the CART1 due to the severity of the disease, its safety regarding CRS, CRES, infections, and organ injury is still excellent. Therefore, CART2 remains a viable option for treating pediatric relapsed B‐ALL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells revolutionized treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in recent years. Currently, two CAR T cell products—idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel—are approved in the United States and the European Union to treat patients with three prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti‐CD38 antibody. Moreover, seminal phase III trials of both agents in earlier lines of therapy have been published recently. Despite unprecedented rates of deep and lasting remissions in RRMM, there are still areas of uncertainty regarding the optimal use and distribution of CAR T cells in multiple myeloma. In the current review, we discuss the available data on approved CAR T cell products as well as unmet clinical needs and ongoing developments to optimize usage of this promising treatment modality in multiple myeloma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Selinexor, an oral inhibitor of the nuclear transport protein Exportin-1, shows promising single-agent activity in clinical trials of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and preclinical synergy with topoisomerase (topo) IIα inhibitors. We conducted a phase 1, dose-escalation study of selinexor with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) in 23 patients aged < 60 years with R/R AML. Due to dose-limiting hyponatremia in 2 patients on dose level 2 (selinexor 40 mg/m2), the maximum tolerated dose was 30 mg/m2. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related non-hematologic toxicities were febrile neutropenia, catheter-related infections, diarrhea, hyponatremia, and sepsis. The overall response rate was 43% with 6 patients (26%) achieving complete remission (CR), 2 (9%) with CR with incomplete count recovery, and 2 (9%) with a morphologic leukemia-free state. Seven of 10 responders proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The combination of selinexor with MEC is a feasibile treatment option for patients with R/R AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often fail to achieve permanent complete remission (CR) and frequently relapse, indicating an urgent need to explore effective salvage therapies. Recent advances in AML treatment have been attributed to the combination of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) with hypomethylating agents (HMAs); however, the use of this combination in young adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML has not been reported. We retrospectively examined 31 young patients with R/R AML treated with VEN plus an HMA. We evaluated the demographic data, cytogenetic characteristics, AML types, response rates, and transplantation-related data for the patients in our cohort. The combination of VEN + HMA yielded a CR rate of 48.4%. The most prominent hematologic adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in all patients, with 90.3% of cases being grade ≥3. Non-hematologic toxicities were relatively mild and infrequent, with an incidence of 45.2%. More than half of the patients with sustained CR had received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), of whom two died of transplant-related complications. Our results showed that the combination of VEN + HMA appeared to be a highly effective and well-tolerated salvage therapy option for young patients with R/R AML, enabling more young patients to proceed to potentially curative allo-HSCT. However, additional, well-designed studies with larger numbers of patients are required to confirm the advantages of VEN + HMA in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from haploidentical and matched sibling donors for treatment of high-risk and refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods Data on the efficacy of haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) with myeloablative conditioning regimen were retrospectively analyzed and compared with that of matched sibling donors' peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) for treatment of high-risk refractory/relapsed AML in our center from January 1st, 2010 to June 30th, 2020. Results A total of 98 patients were enrolled, including 62 patients in the Haplo-HSCT group and 36 patients in MSD-HSCT group. The median age, conditioning regimen, and infusion doses of MNC and CD34+ cells were significantly different between the two groups, but no significant differences in other baseline parameters were found. Transplantation-related infectious complications and the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were also not significantly different between the two groups. The 3-year cumulative relapse in the Haplo-HSCT group was significantly lower than that in the MSD-HSCT group (16.2% vs. 41.1%, P=0.036). The 3-year DFS of the Haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups were 66.98% and 41.8%, respectively (P=0.140), and their OS were 73.37% and 51.41%, respectively (P=0.105). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of Haplo-HSCT for the treatment of high-risk and refractory/relapsed AML is similar to that of MSD-HSCT, and Haplo-HSCT may have better GVL effect.

Abstract Selinexor is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound that inhibits exportin‐1 (XPO1), a novel therapeutic target that is overexpressed in multiple myeloma (MM) and is responsible for the transport of ∼220 nuclear proteins to the cytoplasm, including tumour suppressor proteins. Inhibition of this process has demonstrated substantial antimyeloma activity in preclinical studies, both alone and in combination with established MM therapeutics. Based on a clinical trial programme encompassing multiple combination regimens, selinexor‐based therapy has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), with selinexor‐dexamethasone approved in the later‐relapse setting for penta‐refractory patients and selinexor‐bortezomib‐dexamethasone approved for patients who have received ≥1 prior therapy. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the clinical data on selinexor‐based regimens, including recent updates from the 2022 American Society of Hematology annual meeting, and summarise ongoing studies of this novel targeted agent in newly diagnosed MM and RRMM.

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with standard front-line immunochemotherapy, whereas nearly 30–40% of patients experience refractory or relapse. For several decades, the standard treatment strategy for fit relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients has been high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). However, the patients who failed in salvage treatment or those ineligible for subsequent auto-SCT have dismal outcomes. Several immune-based therapies have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and novel small molecules. Meanwhile, allogeneic SCT and radiotherapy are still necessary for disease control for fit patients with certain conditions. In this review, to expand clinical treatment options, we summarize the recent progress of immune-related therapies and prospect the future indirections in patients with R/R DLBCL.

ABSTRACTObjectives Young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often fail to achieve permanent complete remission (CR) and frequently relapse, indicating an urgent need to explore effective salvage therapies. Recent advances in AML treatment have been attributed to the combination of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) with hypomethylating agents (HMAs); however, the use of this combination in young adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML has not been reported.Methods We retrospectively examined 31 young patients with R/R AML treated with VEN plus an HMA. We evaluated the demographic data, cytogenetic characteristics, AML types, response rates, and transplantation-related data for the patients in our cohort.Results The combination of VEN + HMA yielded a CR rate of 48.4%. The most prominent hematologic adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in all patients, with 90.3% of cases being grade ≥3. Non-hematologic toxicities were relatively mild and infrequent, with an incidence of 45.2%. More than half of the patients with sustained CR had received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), of whom two died of transplant-related complications.Conclusion Our results showed that the combination of VEN + HMA appeared to be a highly effective and well-tolerated salvage therapy option for young patients with R/R AML, enabling more young patients to proceed to potentially curative allo-HSCT. However, additional, well-designed studies with larger numbers of patients are required to confirm the advantages of VEN + HMA in this population.

Novel cellular immunotherapies such as T-cell engaging antibodies (TCEAbs) are changing the landscape of treatment for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), especially in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. TCEAbs harness the power of the host immune system to induce killing of tumor cells by binding to both the tumor antigen and the T-cell receptor. Since the approval of blinatumomab for R/R acute lymphoblastic leukemia, there has been significant development in novel TCEAbs. Many of these novel TCEAbs have shown promising effectiveness in R/R DLBCL, with favorable response rates including complete remissions, even in heavily pretreated patients. There are unique therapy-related toxicities with TCEAbs, namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS), and it is important to both recognize and manage these side effects appropriately. This review examines the development and mechanism of action of these TCEAbs, and the available published data from clinical trials. Their role in the treatment of DLBCL, the management of therapy-related adverse events, and the mechanisms of resistance will also be discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from haploidentical and matched sibling donors for treatment of high-risk and refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods Data on the efficacy of haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) with myeloablative conditioning regimen were retrospectively analyzed and compared with that of matched sibling donors’ peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) for treatment of highrisk refractory/relapsed AML in our center from January 1st, 2010 to June 30th, 2020. Results A total of 98 patients were enrolled, including 62 patients in the Haplo-HSCT group and 36 patients in MSD-HSCT group. The median age, conditioning regimen, and infusion doses of MNC and CD34+ cells were significantly different between the two groups, but no significant differences in other baseline parameters were found. Transplantation-related infectious complications and the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were also not significantly different between the two groups. The 3-year cumulative relapse in the Haplo-HSCT group was significantly lower than that in the MSD-HSCT group (16.2% vs. 41.1%, P=0.036). The 3-year DFS of the Haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups were 66.98% and 41.8%, respectively (P=0.140), and their OS were 73.37% and 51.41%, respectively (P=0.105). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of Haplo-HSCT for the treatment of high-risk and refractory/relapsed AML is similar to that of MSD-HSCT, and Haplo-HSCT may have better GVL effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (MoAB) therapy has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma. However, not all patients sustain durable responses. We aimed to describe the natural history of patients relapsed or refractory (R/R) to CD38 MoAB therapy. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 81 patients with multiple myeloma who progressed after treatment with daratumumab. Our cohort was heavily pretreated, with a median of two lines prior to daratumumab and only 17 patients received daratumumab as a first line. A total of 38.2% had received a previous autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and 61.7% had received both an immunomodulatory drug (IMID) and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). The median overall survival (OS) was 21 months for the global cohort but it decreased to 14 months for triple-class refractory patients and 5 months for penta-refractory patients. Most of the patients (83.9%) received treatment after daratumumab progression, in many cases with second generation IMID or PI, but seven patients were treated with anti-BCMA therapy and three patients received CART therapy within a clinical trial. In conclusion, patients R/R to daratumumab represent an unmet clinical need with poor prognosis and in need of incorporation of new treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease that can be managed with several treatment options. However, there is a lack of comparative data on the efficacy of these options in different phases of the disease. Aim of the study: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose Dexamethasone (HD-DXM), Prednisolone + Azathioprine, Rituximab, Eltrombopag, and Romiplostim schedules in persistent, chronic refractory or relapsed Egyptian ITP patients with a platelet count ≤30 × 109/L. The primary outcome measure was a sustained increase in platelet counts over 50 × 109/L for an additional 12 months without additional ITP regimens. The study also aimed to identify a suitable treatment regimen with a long remission duration for each phase of ITP. Results: Prednisolone + Azathioprine was significantly more effective in achieving an overall response in persistent patients than Romiplostim, high-dose Dexamethasone, and Rituximab. (90.9% vs. 66.6, [Odds ratio, OR: 5; confidence interval, CI 95% (0.866–28.86)], 45%, [OR: 0.082, CI 95% (0.015–0.448)] and, 25%, [OR: 30, CI 95% (4.24–211.8)], respectively, p-value < 0.01). Eltrombopag was significantly more effective in achieving a durable response in refractory ITP than HD-DXM, Rituximab, and Prednisolone; (80% compared to 32.2% [OR: 0.119, CI 95% (0.035–0.410)], 22.2% [OR:0.071, CI 95% (0.011–0.455)], and 18.1% [OR: 0.056, CI 95% (0.009–0.342)], respectively, p-value < 0.01). Conclusions: Finally, Eltrombopag following HD-DXM showed the highest percentage of patients with complete treatment-free survival times of at least 330 days. These findings could help clinicians choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients with ITP based on the phase of the disease. This trial is registered in clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT05861297. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine / Ankara Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Mecmuasi is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder caused by antigen-specific T cells and antiplatelet autoantibodies that inhibit platelet production in the bone marrow or destroy platelets in the spleen. ITP is a form of autoimmunity and is closely associated with inflammation. Corticosteroids are the first-line therapy for ITP, with a total response rate of 53–80%. However, corticosteroid therapy is associated with significant side effects and is often ineffective in patients with corticosteroid-resistant or -intolerant disease. Eltrombopag has been validated as a second-line option in ITP therapy. Despite several studies demonstrating the efficacy and safety of Eltrombopag in immune thrombocytopenia patients, the prevalence of Eltrombopag-induced acute kidney injury has been observed. This case report describes a patient who experienced acute kidney injury during Eltrombopag therapy. A sudden increase in serum creatinine to 6.7 mg/dL and metabolic acidosis occurred after eight weeks of Eltrombopag. The patient's renal failure had worsened, proteinuria was detected, and emergency hemodialysis was initiated. With vigilant kidney function screening and prompt treatment, the patient's renal function improved remarkably following cessation of Eltrombopag and initiation of hemodialysis. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive medication history-taking and vigilant kidney function screening in patients receiving Eltrombopag. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) has a dismal prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the activity and tolerability of venetoclax combined with azacitidine plus homoharringtonine (VAH) regimen for R/R AML. Methods This phase 2 trial was done at ten hospitals in China. Eligible patients were R/R AML (aged 18–65 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. Patients received venetoclax (100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, and 400 mg on days 3–14) and azacitidine (75 mg/m2 on days 1–7) and homoharringtonine (1 mg/m2 on days 1–7). The primary endpoint was composite complete remission rate [CRc, complete response (CR) plus complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)] after 2 cycles of treatment. The secondary endpoints include safety and survival. Results Between May 27, 2020, and June 16, 2021, we enrolled 96 patients with R/R AML, including 37 primary refractory AML and 59 relapsed AML (16 relapsed after chemotherapy and 43 after allo-HSCT). The CRc rate was 70.8% (95% CI 60.8–79.2). In the patients with CRc, measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative was attained in 58.8% of CRc patients. Accordingly, overall response rate (ORR, CRc plus partial remission (PR)) was 78.1% (95% CI 68.6–85.4). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months (95% CI 6.6–22.8) for all patients, median overall survival (OS) was 22.1 months (95% CI 12.7–Not estimated), and event-free survival (EFS) was 14.3 months (95% CI 7.0–Not estimated). The 1-year OS was 61.5% (95% CI 51.0–70.4), and EFS was 51.0% (95% CI 40.7–60.5). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (37.4%), sepsis (11.4%), and pneumonia (21.9%). Conclusions VAH is a promising and well-tolerated regimen in R/R AML, with high CRc and encouraging survival. Further randomized studies are needed to be explored. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04424147.

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), leading to unprecedented responses in this patient population. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) has been recently approved for treatment of triple-class exposed RRMM. We report real-life experiences with the commercial use of ide-cel in RRMM patients. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the first 16 triple-class exposed RRMM patients treated with ide-cel at a single academic center. We assessed toxicities, response to treatment, CAR T expansion and soluble BCMA (sBCMA) levels. Results We identified 16 consecutive RRMM patients treated with ide-cel between 06–10/2022. Median age was 69 years, 6 (38%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics, 3 (19%) R-ISS stage III, and 5 (31%) extramedullary disease. Median number of previous treatment lines was 6 (3–12). Manufacturing success rate was 88% (6% required second lymphapheresis, 6% received an out-of-specification product). At 3 months, the overall response rate (ORR) was 69% (44% sCR, 6% CR, 19% VGPR). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 15 (94%) patients (88% G1, 6% G2), immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in 1 (6% G1), febrile neutropenia in 11 (69%), and infections in 5 (31%). Prolonged hematologic toxicity occurred in 4/16 (25%) patients. Other non-hematological toxicities were elevated hepatic enzymes (38%), colitis (6%, G3) and DIC (6%, G2). Responses were more frequent in patients with higher CAR T expansion (100% vs 38%), and lack of decrease or plateau of sBCMA levels was typically observed in non-responders. Conclusions We report one of the first cohorts of RRMM treated with commercial ide-cel. The ORR was 69% and safety profile was manageable, but prolonged hematologic toxicity still represents a major challenge. Responses correlated with in vivo CAR T cell expansion, underlining the need of further research to optimize CAR T expansion.

Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis and represents a major unmet medical need. We report on a real-world academic center experience of treating 25 patients with relapsed/refractory AML using venetoclax in combination with decitabine or azacitidine, which is not otherwise widely evaluated in the current literature. Our patients come from a large, socioeconomically and geographically diverse area including the majority of Northern California. Most had ELN Adverse Risk (52%) or Intermediate Risk (44%) AML, and most had an ECOG Performance Status of 1 (64%). Over half (52%) had prior hypomethylating agent exposure, and 40% had Secondary AML. We observed an overall response rate of 52%, with eight patients (32%) achieving composite complete remission. Median overall survival was 5.5 months, and for patients achieving composite complete remission this was 21.6 months. One-year estimated overall survival was 38%. Three patients were able to proceed directly to stem cell transplant for consolidation, and all three were alive at last follow-up, ranging 13.8-24.0 months. We found venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents to be well tolerated and potentially efficacious in securing long-term remissions for patients with relapsed/refractory AML.

Introduction: Treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) and myeloid sarcoma (MS) has presented challenges for decades. Studies on selinexor in combination with various standard or intensive chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of R/R AML have demonstrated promising results. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy-free or low- dose chemotherapy regimens with selinexor for R/R AML and MS patients. Methods: Ten patients with R/R AML or MS who received chemotherapy-free or low-dose chemotherapy regimens in combination with selinexor at Tongji Hospital from October 2021 to August 2022 were included in this study. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), transplantation rate, and safety. Results: All patients were evaluable for response, achieving CR in four (40.0%) patients and CRi in two (20.0%) patients for a total CR/CRi of 60.0%. The ORR was 80.0% when patients with PR were included. Five (50.0%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after treatment with selinexor-containing regimens. At the end of the follow-up, seven (70.0%) patients were alive, and three patients died of transplant-related complications or disease progression. The most frequently reported nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) in patients were grade 1 or 2 asymptomatic hyponatremia. Conclusion: The chemotherapy-free or low-dose chemotherapy regimens in combination with selinexor for R/R AML are feasible and tolerable and provide an opportunity for patients to receive transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dinutuximab beta is approved for the maintenance treatment of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB), including patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. However, the data on its use in real-world clinical practice is limited. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 54 patients with HR-NB who received maintenance therapy with dinutuximab beta in first-line (37 patients) or R/R settings (17 patients) at three centers in Poland. Of the 37 patients who received first-line treatment, twenty-eight had a complete response, two had a partial response, three had progressive disease, and four relapsed at the end of treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 24.37 months, and the three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 0.63 and 0.80, respectively. Of the 17 patients in the R/R group, 11 had a complete response, two had a partial response, one had stable disease, and three had progressive disease or relapsed at the end of treatment. The median OS was 33.1 months and the three-year PFS and OS were 0.75 and 0.86, respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated, including in patients with co-morbidities and those who had experienced toxicities with previous therapies. These findings demonstrate that the use of dinutuximab beta is feasible and beneficial as a first-line or R/R treatment in routine clinical practice in Poland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with standard front-line immunochemotherapy, whereas nearly 30–40% of patients experience refractory or relapse. For several decades, the standard treatment strategy for fit relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients has been high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). However, the patients who failed in salvage treatment or those ineligible for subsequent auto-SCT have dismal outcomes. Several immune-based therapies have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and novel small molecules. Meanwhile, allogeneic SCT and radiotherapy are still necessary for disease control for fit patients with certain conditions. In this review, to expand clinical treatment options, we summarize the recent progress of immune-related therapies and prospect the future indirections in patients with R/R DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a promising therapeutic target for multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of monotherapy with the conjugated anti-BCMA monoclonal antibody belantamab mafodotin in triple-class refractory patients with MM in real-world practice. Patients refractory to at least one proteasome inhibitor, one immunomodulatory drug, and one anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received belantamab mafodotin at 2.5 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. Overall, 27 patients with a median age of 65 years (range 41–81) were included. Of these, 52% were male and the median number of prior lines of treatment was 5 (4–10). The overall response rate (partial response or better) was 52%, whereas the disease control rate (stable disease or better) was 70%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (95%CI: 0–7), whereas the median PFS among the responders was 12 months (95%CI: 6–18). Regarding the toxicity profile, the most common toxicity was eye toxicity, in 44% of the patients. Keratopathy grade 2–3 was reported in 33.3% of the patients. In conclusion, belantamab mafodotin showed a safety and efficacy profile consistent with the results of the registrational study. Importantly, heavily pretreated patients who responded to treatment derived a substantial survival benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate real-world chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy treatment patterns. Patient & methods: Relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma patients who received CAR T-cell therapy were identified. Patient characteristics, setting of CAR T-cell infusion, incidence of CAR T-cell therapy-associated adverse events and healthcare resource utilization were assessed. Results: Of 1175 patients, 83% were infused inpatient. Within three days postinfusion, inpatient-infused patients had a significantly higher risk of CAR T-associated adverse events (hazard ratio: 2.67; 95% CI: 2.09–3.42) compared with outpatient-infused patients. By day 30, 67% of outpatient-infused patients were hospitalized at least once. Conclusion: These findings suggest that physicians were able to select lower-risk patients for outpatient infusion, but postinfusion hospitalizations still occur. This study tracks outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy between 2017 and 2020. The authors used the Anlitiks All-Payor Claims (AAPC) database, which includes insurance claims of patients covered through Medicare, Medicaid or commercial insurance plans. AAPC includes over 80% of insured patients in the USA healthcare system. The study describes where patients received CAR T-cell therapy (inpatient/outpatient), rates of adverse events potentially related to CAR T-cell treatment and how much healthcare the patients received. In the 3 days after receiving CAR T-cell therapy, rates of CAR T-associated adverse events were significantly higher in patients who received CAR T-cell therapy in the inpatient setting, compared with outpatients. The findings suggest that lower-risk patients may receive CAR T-cell therapy as outpatients, but that most outpatient-infused patients will still require inpatient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]