Search

BackgroundWell-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) incidence in pediatrics is rising, most being papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The objective of the study was to assess the prevalence of different mutations in pediatric WDTC and correlate the genotype with the clinical phenotype.MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective study. Thyroid tissue blocks from 42 consecutive pediatric WDTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy between 2001 and 2013 were analyzed at Quest Diagnostics for BRAF(V600E), RAS mutations (N,K,H), and RET/PTC and PAX8/PPARγ rearrangements, using validated molecular methods. Thyroid carcinomas included PTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC), and follicular variant of PTC (FVPTC).ResultsThirty-nine samples (29 females) were genotyped. The mean age at diagnosis was 14.7 years (range 7.9-18.4 years), and most were Hispanic (56.4%) or Caucasian (35.9%). The mean follow-up period was 2.9 years. Mutations were noted in 21/39 (53.8%), with both BRAF(V600E) (n = 9), and RET/PTC (n = 6) detected only in PTC. Mutations were detected in 2/5 FTC (PAX8/PPARγ and NRAS) and 3/6 FVPTC cases (PAX8/PPARγ). Of 28 PTC patients, 57.1% had mutations: 32.1% with BRAF(V600E), 21.4% with RET/PTC, and 3.6% with NRAS. Of patients with BRAF(V600E), 77.8% were Hispanic and 88.9% were >15 years, while all RET/PTC-positive patients were ≤15 years (p = 0.003). Tumor size, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis at diagnosis (or soon after (131)I ablation) did not vary significantly based on the mutation.ConclusionsBRAF(V600E) was the most common mutation, especially in older and Hispanic adolescents. A larger, ethnically diverse pediatric cohort followed long term will enable the genotypic variability, clinical presentation, and response to therapy to be better assessed.

Background and objectivesConventional lipid profiles usually cannot predict cardiovascular outcomes in chronic disease states. We hypothesized that novel lipoprotein subfraction concentrations and LDL particle size measurements better predict mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsMortality-predictability of LDL particle diameter and lipoprotein subfraction concentrations, measured by novel ion mobility, was examined in a cohort of 235 hemodialysis patients who were followed for up to 6 years using Cox models with adjustment for important covariables.ResultsPatients were 54 ± 14 years old (mean ± SD) and included 45% women with total, LDL and HDL cholesterol levels of 143 ± 42, 76 ± 29, and 37 ± 12 mg/dl, respectively. Over 6 years, 71 patients (31%) died. Conventional lipid profile was not associated with mortality. The death hazard ratio (HR, 95% confidence interval) of the highest versus lowest quartiles of very small and large LDL particle concentrations were 2.43 (1.03 to 5.72) and 0.38 (0.15 to 0.96), respectively. Across increasing quartiles of LDL particle diameter, death HRs were 1.00, 0.93 (0.46 to 1.87), 0.43 (0.21 to 0.89), and 0.45 (0.31 to 1.00), respectively.ConclusionsWhereas conventional lipid profile cannot predict mortality in MHD patients, larger novel LDL particle diameter or higher large LDL particle concentrations appear predictive of greater survival, whereas higher very small LDL particle concentration is associated with higher death risk. Examining lipoprotein subfraction modulation in chronic diseases is indicated.

Purpose: Measuring IGF-1, a biomarker for GH activity, is critical to evaluating disordered hypothalamic-pituitary GH axis. Inconsistent IGF-1 measurements among different immunoassays are well documented. We switched from Immulite 2000 immunoassay to narrow-mass-extraction, high-resolution liquid chromatography mass-spectrometry (LC-MS) compliant with recent consensus recommendations on assay standardization. Comparability of these two assays in patients with pituitary disease in a clinical practice setting is not known. We sought to compare IGF-1 levels on Immulite 2000 and LC-MS in samples from naïve and treated patients with secretory and non-secretory pituitary masses. Methods: We prospectively collected serum samples from 101 patients treated at the Cedars-Sinai Pituitary Center between February 2012 and March 2014. We intentionally recruited more patients with acromegaly or GH deficiency to ensure a clinically representative cohort. Samples were classified as in or out of the respective reference ranges. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between assays. Results: Twenty-four percent of samples were classified differently as below, in, or above range. Agreement between the assays was poor overall, with a significant bias for immunoassay reporting higher values than LC-MS. This pattern was also observed in patients with acromegaly and those with ≥ 2 pituitary hormone deficiencies. Conclusions: IGF-1 results may differ after switching from an older immunoassay to a consensus-compliant assay such as LC-MS. Clinicians should consider the potential impact of assay switching before altering treatment due to discrepant results, particularly in patients monitored over time, such as those with acromegaly and GH deficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]