Search

Spotted fever group rickettsioses (SFGRs) are arthropod-borne diseases caused by obligate intracellular, gram-negative bacteria of the genus Rickettsia. SFGRs are associated with [approximately equal to] 20 species of Rickettsia, of [...]

Pyomyositis, accompanied by aseptic arthritis, has been previously documented in several publications. However, none of the authors in the mentioned case reports offered a pathophysiological explanation for this unusual phenomenon or proposed a treatment protocol. We present a case of a healthy, 70‐year‐old male who was presented to the emergency department 4 days after tripping over a pile of wooden planks and getting stabbed by a nail to his thigh. The right thigh was swollen. Unproportional pain was produced by a light touch to the thigh. A laboratory test and a CT scan were obtained. The working diagnosis was pyomyositis of the thigh and septic arthritis of the ipsilateral knee. The patient underwent urgent debridement and irrigation of his right thigh. An arthroscopic knee lavage was performed as well. Intraoperative cultures from the thigh revealed the growth of Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus. Cultures from synovial fluid were sterile; thus, septic arthritis was very unlikely. The source of the knee effusion might have been an aseptic inflammatory response due to the proximity of the thigh infection. Anatomically, the quadriceps muscle inserts on the patella, and its tendon fuses with the knee capsule, creating a direct fascial track from the thigh to the knee. The inflammatory response surrounding the infection may have followed this track, creating a domino effect, affecting adjacent capillaries within the joint capsule, and causing plasma leakage into the synovial space, leading to joint effusion. Our suggested treatment is addressing the primary infection with antibiotics and considering adding anti‐inflammatory therapy, given our suspicion that this process has an inflammatory component. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approximately 20-50% of antimicrobial therapy in hospitalized patients is considered inappropriate, which may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The best method for evaluation of appropriateness is not well defined.Aim: To evaluate the rate of appropriate antimicrobial therapy in a secondary hospital using three different methods, and determine the rate of agreement between the different methods.Methods: A point prevalence study included all adult hospitalized patients receiving systemic antimicrobial therapy during 2016, screened on a single day. Clinical, laboratory and therapeutic data were collected from patient files, and appropriateness was rated with a qualitative evaluation by expert opinion. In addition, a quantitative evaluation was performed according to 11 quality indicators (QIs) rated for each patient. A strict definition of appropriateness was fulfilled if six essential QIs were met, and a lenient definition was fulfilled if at least five QIs were met. Agreement between methods was analysed using kappa statistic.Findings: Among 106 patients included, rates of appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy ranged from 20% to 75%, depending on the method of evaluation. Very low agreement was found between the strict definition and expert opinion (kappa=0.068), and medium agreement was found between the lenient definition and expert opinion (kappa=0.45).Conclusions: Rates of appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy varied between evaluation methods, with low to moderate agreement between the different methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Q fever has significant consequences for patients with persistent localized infection. A combination of doxycycline with hydroxychloroquine, for at least 18-24 months, is the first-line therapy. The use of serology as a prognostic marker during therapy is controversial. Methods: A retrospective, observational cohort study in two outpatient clinics in northern Israel. All adults with persistent Q fever (2015-2021) were included in the study. Clinical failure was defined as relapse or death related to Q fever after end of treatment (EOT). Serological cure was defined as phase 1 IgG ≤800 or a four-fold decrease at EOT. Results: Twenty-two patients were included in the study, with a median follow up of 40 months (IQR = 28.5-63.5), and median treatment duration of 28.5 months (IQR = 21.8-50.5). Clinical cure occurred in 18 patients (82%), serological cure in 10 (45%). Phase 1 IgG at presentation was significantly higher in the clinical failure group (median 9600 vs. 3200 in the clinical cure group, p  = 0.019), and at 6-12 months after EOT (median 6400 vs. 800 respectively, p  = 0.03). Phase 1 IgG levels at 1 year and EOT were similar in both groups. Positive phase 2 IgM after one year of therapy correlated with clinical failure ( p  = 0.038), but not at EOT or after EOT. Conclusion: Phase 1 IgG levels at presentation, phase 2 IgM at 1 year, and Phase 1 IgG 6-12 months after EOT were associated with clinical failure in patients with persistent Q fever.

Introduction: Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) are opportunistic environmental pathogens that can produce a wide range of diseases, including infection of the skin and soft tissues. Mycobacterium fortuitum is a predominant causative agent of postsurgical wound infection, especially in breast surgery. Peri-prosthetic infection due to Mycobacterium fortuitum are uncommon, but increasingly reported. This report summarizes the case of a young healthy female who underwent bilateral breast mastopexy with insertion of silicone implants. Shortly after the procedure she presented with clinical signs of wound infection that failed to heal completely in spite of repeated drainage and empiric antibiotic therapy. Additional microbiological investigation allowed for a diagnosis of Mycobacterium fortuitum. A prolonged course of anti-mycobacterial therapy, combined with removal of the implants initiated eradication of the infection and enabled re-implantation of the prosthesis. This case report underscores the importance of awareness to this type of pathogen especially in cases of exudative infection with sterile cultures. Timely identification can lead to prompt therapy of patients preventing further complications, costs and remaining aesthetic damage.

Introduction: Q fever is an acute zoonotic infection, which in some cases is complicated by a chronic disease. Diagnosis is based on serology, and in patients with a chronic disease, the source of infection must be investigated., Aims: To describe patients with chronic Q fever, who were treated at the Hillel Yaffe Medical Center: risk factors, course of the disease, and serological findings., Methods: This was an observational study; patients with chronic Q fever who were treated in the Infectious Diseases Clinic during the period 5/2015 - 1/2018 were included. The diagnosis was based on clinical findings and results of phase 1 IgG ≥ 800. Clinical, laboratory and imaging data from diagnosis to the end of treatment were collected., Results: Sixteen patients were included in the study; all these patients were treated with antibiotics, and three also underwent operations. Risk factors for a chronic infection were a significant valvular disease in 11 patients (69%) and vascular diseases in five (31%). Trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was performed in 13 patients (81%), and a 18F-FDG/PET-CT was performed in eight patients (50%). The source of infection was found in seven patients, four with endocarditis and three with vascular infection., Conclusions: Endocarditis was more common than vascular infection. In 56% of the patients, the source of the infection was not found., Discussion: We presented patients with chronic Q fever who were treated in a unique clinic in Israel. Diagnosing the source of the infection is challenging; the increasing use of 18F-FDG/PET-CT allowed accurate diagnosis in some patients in which TEE results were negative.

Polymicrobial endocarditis is uncommon. We present a case of polymicrobial endocarditis caused by Enterococcus faecalis and Coxiella burnetii and review previous cases of polymicrobial endocarditis involving Coxiella burnetii. Testing for Q fever should be considered in any patient with endocarditis living in an endemic area.