Search

Background: Lisfranc injury is rare and often very subtle. Subsequently, 20-50% of injuries are initially missed. Late or missed diagnosis increases the risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis., Case: A 51-year old men visited our surgical outpatient clinic with plantar hematoma and inability to bear weight on the right foot after he tripped three weeks earlier. Initial visitation to the emergency department after trauma led to the diagnosis contusion or ligament injury of the foot/ankle. After additional CT-scan of the foot, the final diagnosis of subtle/stable Lisfranc injury was made. Twelve weeks after trauma, the patient still experienced pain and was dissatisfied with the course of treatment., Conclusion: Timely diagnosis of Lisfranc injury is important to ensure adequate treatment may take place immediately. This achieves the most optimal prognosis. Always think of Lisfranc joint injury in case of plantar hematoma together with an inability to bear weight of the foot.

Objective: The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)., Methods: This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests., Results: The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively)., Conclusion: In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair., (Copyright © 2020 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To study the changes in peak systolic velocities of the ipsilateral external carotid artery (ECA) following carotid revascularization., Methods: All patients randomized to carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS; ISRCTN25337470) in our center were included. Peak systolic velocities (PSV) were assessed with duplex ultrasound (DUS) at baseline, at 30 days, and at 12 and 24 months after treatment. Our primary outcome measure was the change in blood flow velocities in the ECA (ΔPSVECA). Secondary outcome measure was the prevalence of post interventional ECA occlusion., Results: Of 270 patients enrolled in ICSS at our center, 224 patients (mean age, 68.8 years; 154 males) were included in the present study (116 CAS, 108 CEA). Baseline PSV in the ipsilateral ECA was similar between the groups. Following CAS, PSV gradually increased during follow-up, whereas PSV remained relatively stable after CEA; mean difference of PSV between CAS and CEA: 23 cm/s (95% CI, -5 to 52), 58 cm/s (95% CI, 27-89), and 69 cm/s (95% CI, 31-107) at 30 days, 12 months, and 24 months. One new ECA occlusion occurred after CAS and two after CEA., Conclusion: Blood flow velocities in the ipsilateral ECA increase significantly after CAS but not after CEA. However, this does not lead to a higher rate of ECA occlusion in the first 2 years after revascularization. We conclude that CAS is not inferior to CEA in preserving the ECA as a possible potential collateral pathway for cerebral blood supply within 2 years following revascularization., (Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Selective endarterectomy of external carotid artery (ECA) stenosis has been considered a therapeutic option for patients presenting with symptomatic ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion to correct cerebral hypoperfusion or eliminate a source of emboli. However, data are scarce, and the long-term benefit of ECA revascularization remains unclear. Our objective was to study the operative results and durability of selective ECA endarterectomy in patients presenting with cerebrovascular symptoms in association with nonacute ipsilateral ICA occlusion., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 27 consecutive patients who underwent selective ECA endarterectomy in a single center between 2000 and 2010. All patients presented with neurologic symptoms (<6 months of surgery, 78% repeat events) referable to an ipsilateral occlusion of the ICA and concomitant stenosis of the ECA. We assessed the perioperative clinical outcome <30 days and at midterm follow-up (mean, 31.6 months). Patency was defined as freedom of duplex ultrasound detected ≥ 50% restenosis., Results: Endarterectomy of the ECA was successful in 26 patients (96.3%) with one ECA found occluded at surgery. No perioperative deaths occurred. In the 30 days after surgery, one patient developed an ipsilateral disabling ischemic stroke (3.7%), and one patient (3.7%) had a myocardial infarction. At follow-up, nine patients had died: one of a fatal ischemic stroke, six of non-vascular-related causes, and two of unknown causes. At 3 years, 83% (standard error, 8%) of patients were free from stroke or death, and 80% (standard error, 8%) of the operated-on arteries were patent. Five patients developed restenosis ≥ 50% (n = 2, asymptomatic) or occlusion (n = 3, one symptomatic) ≤ 3 months, and two other patients developed late asymptomatic restenosis., Conclusions: Selective endarterectomy of the ECA in symptomatic patients with an ipsilateral occlusion of the ICA is a feasible procedure with an acceptable perioperative risk. Most patients remain stroke-free during follow-up and have a low rate of symptomatic restenosis., (Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Different flow velocities have been reported after carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS) than after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We compared blood flow velocities following CAS and CEA in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS; ISRCTN25337470)., Materials and Methods: In total, 254 patients (70% male; 129 CAS and 125 CEA) were included. Mean peak systolic velocities (PSVICA) were assessed at baseline, 30 days, 1 and 2 years. Following both treatments, restenosis ≥ 50% was defined as PSVmean >125 cm s(-1)., Results: CAS and CEA resulted in a similar reduction in PSVICA 1 month after treatment. Post-intervention analysis for each treatment separately revealed that PSVICA following CAS increased significantly during follow-up (30 days to 2 years; 22.4 cm s(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI), 14.3 to 30.5). On the contrary, PSVICA following CEA remained relatively stable during follow-up (4.7 cm s(-1); 95% CI, -6.5 to 15.9). When we analysed the increase in PSVICA between both treatments after 2 years of follow-up, no significant interprocedural difference was observed. The internal carotid artery/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) PSV ratio increased after CAS but not after CEA: 1.2 vs. 1.1 (0.04, 95% CI; -0.16 to 0.25) at 30 days; 1.5 vs. 1.1 (0.39, 95% CI; 0.13 to 0.65) at 1 year; and 1.5 vs. 1.1 (0.36; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.63) at 2 years. The rate of apparent ipsilateral ICA restenosis >50% was higher following CAS (hazard ratio 2.35; 95% CI, 1.35 to 4.09)., Conclusion: Two years after carotid revascularisation, no significant interprocedural difference was observed in the increase of PSVICA between CAS and CEA. However, the ICA/CCA ratio increased more following CAS resulting in an apparent higher rate of restenosis following CAS., (Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Recent randomized trials showed an increased periprocedural risk for stroke with increasing age in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. Manipulation of atherosclerotic plaques during carotid artery stenting can result in plaque rupture with subsequent superimposed thrombus formation, embolization, and cerebrovascular events. We hypothesized that atherosclerotic plaques become more unstable with increasing age and thereby might provide insight into the age-related increased risk of cerebrovascular events during carotid artery stenting., Methods: Carotid atherosclerotic plaques were harvested from 1385 consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy between 2002 and 2010. Carotid plaques were quantitatively analyzed for macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and microvessels; and semiquantitatively analyzed for collagen, calcifications lipid cores, and intraplaque hemorrhages. Patients were divided in 4 groups by age: <60, 60 to 69, 70 to 79, and ≥80 years. Measures of association between age as a continuous variable and histological characteristics were also calculated., Results: Increasing age was associated with a decrease in the amount of smooth muscle cells in the carotid plaque. More plaques with large atheroma and heavy plaque calcifications were observed among elderly patients. After correction for baseline differences, risk factors, and medication use, age was independently associated with a more vulnerable carotid plaque composition., Conclusions: Plaque stability decreases gradually with age. Older patients with carotid stenosis have relatively unstable plaques with low smooth muscle cell content, a high amount of large lipid cores, and more calcified plaques as compared with younger patients. The underlying vulnerable plaque composition in the elderly might be an important contributing factor to the increased risk of stroke for older patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.

Objective: Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has emerged as an alternative for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the prevention of stroke. The benefit of the procedure, however, is hampered by a suggested higher incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) for CAS relative to CEA during follow-up. ISR management remains a challenge for clinicians. In this observational retrospective analysis, we evaluated the operative management of ISR by standard CEA with stent removal, including midterm follow-up in 15 patients., Methods: The present analysis included 15 patients from three Dutch vascular centers who underwent CEA for symptomatic (n = 10) or hemodynamically significant (≥80%) asymptomatic ISR (n = 5). Median time between CAS and CEA was 18.3 months (range, 0-51 months)., Results: Standard CEA with stent removal was performed in all 15 patients. A Javid shunt was used in two procedures. One patient sustained an intraoperative minor ischemic stroke, with complete recovery during the first postoperative days. No neurologic complications occurred in the other 14 patients. Two patients required a reoperation to evacuate a neck hematoma. There were no peripheral nerve complications. After a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 3-100 months), all 15 patients remained asymptomatic and without recurrent restenosis (≥50%) on duplex ultrasound imaging., Conclusion: CEA with stent explantation for ISR after CAS seems an effective and durable therapeutic option, albeit with potential cerebral and bleeding complications, as in this study. The optimal treatment for carotid ISR, however, has yet to be defined., (Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting (CAS) has emerged as an alternative to Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) in treatment of carotid stenotic disease. With increasing life expectancy clinicians are more often confronted with patients of higher age. Octogenarians were often excluded from randomized trials comparing CAS to CEA because they were considered high-risk for revascularization. Conflicting results on the peri-procedural outcome of carotid revascularization in these patients have been reported. In order to objectively evaluate whether age above 80 years should be an upper limit for indicating carotid revascularization we systematically reviewed the currently available literature., Methods: Literature was systematically reviewed between January 2000 and June 2010 using Pubmed and Embase, to identify all relevant studies concerning CAS and CEA in octogenarians. Inclusion criteria were 1) reporting outcome on either CEA or CAS; and 2) data subanalysis on treatment outcome by age. The 30-day Major Adverse Event (MAE) rate (disabling stroke, myocardial infarction or death) was extracted as well as demographic features of included patients., Results: After exclusion of 23 articles, 46 studies were included in this review, 18 involving CAS and 28 involving CEA. A total of 2.963 CAS patients and 14.365 CEA patients with an age >80 years were reviewed. The MAE rate was 6.9% (range 1.6 - 24.0%) following CAS and 4.2% (range 0 - 8.8%) following CEA. A separate analysis in this review included the results of one major registry 140.376 patients) analyzing CEA in octogenarians only reporting on 30-day mortality and not on neurological or cardiac adverse events. When these data were included the MAE following CEA is 2.4% (range 0 - 8.8%), Conclusions: MAE rates after CEA in octogenarians are comparable with the results of large randomized trials in younger patients. Higher complication rates are described for CAS in octogenarians. In general, age > 80 years is not an absolute cut off point to exclude patients from carotid surgery. In our opinion, CEA should remain the golden standard in the treatment of significant carotid artery stenoses, even in the very elderly.