Search

Abstract: Objective: A prospective, randomized, non-blinded, clinical study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and practicability as well as pain reduction and ease of handling of Flammazine® versus Octenidine-Gel® as a primary local antiseptic before synthetic skin substitute application in partial-thickness burns. Methods: Thirty patients with a median age of 42 years suffering from second-degree burns were included in the study. Burns were randomly selected, one area was treated with Flammazine®/gauze, another area in the same patient was treated with Octenidine-Gel®/gauze as initial antiseptic treatment. Within 24h the first gauze change was performed followed by wound inspection, disinfection and synthetic skin substitute application. The study focused on patient pain score, analysis of wound bed and ease of handling of the two local antiseptic agents. Results: There was a significant difference between Flammazine® versus Octenidine-Gel® regarding patient pain score and ease of handling. Octenidine-Gel® was less painful (p <0.05) and easier to handle (p <0.05). There was no significant difference for wound bed evaluation between the two antiseptic agents. A tendency for better wound bed preparation was seen with the use of Octenidine-Gel®. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study Octenidine-Gel® is recommended as a local antiseptic agent, because when compared to Flammazine®, Octenidine-Gel® proved to be better in terms of ease of care, simplicity application, with gentler and faster detachment of the gel from wound surfaces and consequently far less pain during dressing changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: A prospective, randomized, non-blinded, clinical study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and practicability as well as pain reduction and ease of handling of Flammazine® versus Octenidine-Gel® as a primary local antiseptic before synthetic skin substitute application in partial-thickness burns. Methods: Thirty patients with a median age of 42 years suffering from second-degree burns were included in the study. Burns were randomly selected, one area was treated with Flammazine®/gauze, another area in the same patient was treated with Octenidine-Gel®/gauze as initial antiseptic treatment. Within 24h the first gauze change was performed followed by wound inspection, disinfection and synthetic skin substitute application. The study focused on patient pain score, analysis of wound bed and ease of handling of the two local antiseptic agents. Results: There was a significant difference between Flammazine® versus Octenidine-Gel® regarding patient pain score and ease of handling. Octenidine-Gel® was less painful (p <0.05) and easier to handle (p <0.05). There was no significant difference for wound bed evaluation between the two antiseptic agents. A tendency for better wound bed preparation was seen with the use of Octenidine-Gel®. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study Octenidine-Gel® is recommended as a local antiseptic agent, because when compared to Flammazine®, Octenidine-Gel® proved to be better in terms of ease of care, simplicity application, with gentler and faster detachment of the gel from wound surfaces and consequently far less pain during dressing changes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Sparsity of recipient vessels poses a challenge for microsurgical free flap reconstruction of sternal defects following deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery., Methods: From January 2013, a standardized algorithm for dealing with sparse recipient vessels was strictly followed. In this retrospective study including 75 patients, we compared operative details, surgical complications, and reconstructive outcomes of patients treated according to this algorithm (group A: January 2013-May 2021; n = 46) with a historical control group (group B: January 2000-December 2012, n = 29)., Results: The left internal mammary artery had been harvested for arterial bypass grafting in 40 of 46 cases (87%) in group A and in all cases in group B. The right internal mammary artery (RIMA) and right internal mammary vein (RIMV) were the first choice as recipient vessels. In case of unsuitability of the RIMV, a right cephalic vein (CV) turndown was used for venous outflow. If both RIMA and RIMV proved insufficient, a single-stage arterio-venous loop (AVL) between the CV and subclavian artery (CV-SA AVL), CV and thoracoacromial artery (CV-TA AVL), or subclavian artery and subclavian vein (SA-SV AVL) was established. The algorithmic approach significantly reduced partial flap necrosis [group A: n = 3 (7%) versus group b: n = 7 (24%); P = 0.04], and overall operation time [group A: 360 ± 88 min versus group B: 415 ± 80 min; P = 0.01]., Conclusions: Standardized approaches improve clinical outcomes in microsurgical free flap sternal reconstruction after cardiac surgery., Competing Interests: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Scars from Nonsuicidal Self-Injury - What Plastic Surgery Can Do Abstract. Objective: Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) can induce characteristic scar patterns indicating the origin of these scars. This frequently results in the stigmatization of the involved patients with far-reaching consequences for their daily routine and quality of life. Despite patients being highly interested in scar correction, the potential of surgical therapy to alleviate NSSI-prone behavior and its help in destigmatizing surgical corrections and esthetic improvements in these situations are not well-known. Method: Over a period of 5 years, we analyzed 600 patients requesting NSSI scar treatment in our outpatient clinic. We collected data on the motivation for a scar correction, on the maturity of the scars, the involved body parts, and potential prior scar treatments as well as the amount, localization, and type of performed surgical procedures in our institution. Results: Stigmatization (57 %) and limitations in choice of clothing (18 %) were the most frequent reasons given for scar correction. We performed 358 dermabrasions and 55 serial excisions on these patients, nine combinations of both, and 13 other procedures. Conclusions: Plastic surgery offers multiple possibilities to reduce the stigmatization of patients with NSSI scars, who should thus be informed early about their choices.

Background: Despite its high prevalence in adolescents and young adults, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is poorly known and understood in areas other than psychiatry. Due to this lack of knowledge, affected patients often face a lack of understanding as well as rejection and discrimination when seeking help from medical professionals. This not only hampers a lasting improvement of NSSI and the development of a trustful physician-patient relationship but may also lead to traumatisation of affected patients. Based on our patients' data, this article aims to inform interested plastic surgeons about NSSI and thus to support the treatment of affected patients., Patients and Methods: 600 patients with scars from NSSI presenting to our outpatient clinic for the first time during the past five years were enrolled in this study. Extensive data collected during the first contact was analysed and compared with the current literature., Results: 95 % of the patients were female; 5 % were male. On average, patients presented 8.4 years after the last NSSI event and with a mean age of 26 years. NSSI scars were most often located on the left forearm (48 %), followed by both forearms (40 %), the left upper arm (20 %), both upper arms (15 %) and both thighs (14 %). In 57 % of patients, scars were only present on one side. A mean of 380 cm2 of the body surface was affected by NSSI scars. 47 % of patients reported having at least one additional diagnosis, with thyroid dysfunction and depression being the most common. 21 % of patients had ongoing psychiatric or psychological therapy at the time of their first consultation in our clinic., Conclusion: Our data provides first insight into a large population of NSSI patients seeking treatment options for their NSSI-associated scars in a plastic surgery outpatient clinic. Most patients were female with scars located on their forearms. A mean of more than 8 years had passed between their last NSSI and their first presentation to our clinic. Our findings offer a data-based approach to a group of patients with a disease pattern that is largely misunderstood in surgical disciplines and needs more attention, especially in the light of its high prevalence and life-long consequences., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)