Search

Background: Frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in children are usually considered benign. Symptoms and left ventricular dysfunction are indications for treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of flecainide vs metoprolol in reducing PVCs in children., Methods: A randomized open-label crossover trial was conducted of children with a PVC burden of >15% on Holter monitoring successively treated with metoprolol and flecainide, or vice versa, with a drug-free interval of at least 2 weeks. Holter measurements were repeated before and after the start of the antiarrhythmic drug., Results: Sixty patients were screened; 19 patients could be included. Median age was 13.9 years (interquartile range, 5.5 years). Mean baseline PVC burden was 21.7% (n = 18; SD ± 14.0) before the start of flecainide and 21.2% (n = 17; SD ± 11.5) before the start of metoprolol. In a mixed model analysis, the estimated mean reduction in PVC burden was 10.6 percentage points (95% CI, 5.8-15.3) for flecainide and 2.4 percentage points (95% CI,2.7-7.5) for metoprolol, with a significant difference of 8.2 percentage points (95% CI, 0.86-15.46; P = .031). Exploratory analysis revealed that 9 of 18 patients treated with flecainide and 1 of 17 patients treated with metoprolol had a reduction to a PVC burden below 5%. No discriminating factors between flecainide responders and nonresponders were found; the mean plasma level was not significantly different (0.34 mg/L vs 0.52 mg/L; P = .277)., Conclusion: In children with frequent PVCs, flecainide led to a significantly greater reduction of PVC burden compared with metoprolol. Flecainide was effective in only a subgroup of patients, which appears to be unrelated to the plasma level., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)