Search

Background: While the literature has demonstrated a higher prevalence of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the general population compared with central sleep apnea (CSA), more evidence is needed on the long-term clinical impact of and optimal treatment strategies for CSA., Observations: CSA is overrepresented among certain clinical populations, such as those with heart failure, stroke, neuromuscular disorders, and opioid use. The clinical concerns with CSA parallel those of OSA. The absence of respiration (apneas and hypopneas due to lack of effort) results in sympathetic surge, compromise of oxygenation and ventilation, sleep fragmentation, and elevation in blood pressure. Symptoms such as excessive daytime sleepiness, morning headaches, witnessed apneas, and nocturnal arrhythmias are shared between the 2 disorders. A systematic clinical approach should be used to identify and treat CSA., Conclusions: The purpose of this review is to familiarize the primary care community with CSA to aid in the identification and management of this breathing disturbance., Competing Interests: Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article., (Copyright © 2023 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.)

Purpose: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common pathologic sleep disorder with an estimated prevalence in the USA of up to 25% of adult males. With military aviation being heavily comprised of adult men, the impact of OSA on flying operations is concerning as OSA is disqualifying for all flying classes in the US Air Force. In order to minimize the impact of OSA on operations, early identification of at-risk patients is critical in disease management. Individuals could be identified for whom regular polysomnography testing may reveal OSA while mild or sub-clinical, at which point treatment may be initiated in order to promote continued medical qualification for duty and career retention., Methods: We performed a keyword search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar along with searches in the NHGRI/EBI GWAS Catalogue and the Atlas of GWAS Summary Statistics. We included primary research from candidate gene, GWAS, and meta-analyses. We also included other review articles in our search to confirm interpretations and implications of any genetic associations with OSA. Only studies related to OSA susceptibility or risk were included., Results: We identified 134 publications reporting or reviewing genetic associations with OSA risk. These papers reported 301 variants, of which 195 were unique and 33 were replicated in at least two papers. With respect to the strength of association, 43 variants exhibited odds ratios greater than 2. Finally, there were 84 null results reported, 51 of which were in conflict with reported associations., Conclusion: There is ample evidence in the literature to confirm that genetics provide an important contribution to OSA development. The high number of strongly associated variants suggests that a polygenic risk model could be created with high predictive value for prognostic screening., (© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

INTRODUCTION: Precision medicine is an approach to healthcare that is modifying clinical management by leveraging technological advances in genomics that assess a patient's genetic information to identify unique predispositions. While the civilian sector is integrating genomics widely to personalize diagnosis and treatment, the military medical environment has reacted more slowly. The operational requirements of military service encourage a tailored approach for focusing military precision medicine on occupation-specific conditions. Here, we present a survey of the genomic landscape related to military aerospace medicine. METHODS: We collated observations from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) relating genetic markers to conditions that may negatively influence flight operations and for which the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine's Aeromedical Consult Service (ACS) provides aeromedical waiver guidance. Our sources for identifying relevant literature were the GWAS Catalog, the Atlas of GWAS Summary Statistics, and PubMed/Google Scholar searches. RESULTS: Using the ACS guidance as a starting point, we found 1572 papers describing 84 clinical conditions with genetic associations. The earliest aeromedical GWAS publication was in 2006, increasing to 225 publications in 2019. We identified 42,020 polymorphisms from more than 84 million participants across the studies. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed areas where deeper investigations into how genetic markers manifest in clinical diagnosis, prevention, or risk management could lead to increased medical readiness. Additionally, our results show those clinical areas for which guidance could include genetic risk considerations. Chapleau RR, Regn DD, de Castro MJ. Surveying the genomic landscape supporting the development of precision military aerospace medicine . Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2022; 93(2):89-93.

Purpose: Compare virtual bronchoscopy (VB) to fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) for scoring smoke inhalation injury (SII)., Methods: Swine underwent computerized tomography (CT) with VB and FOB before (0) and 24 and 48 h after SII. VB and FOB images were scored by 5 providers off line., Results: FOB and VB scores increased over time (p<0.001) with FOB scoring higher than VB at 0 (0.30±0.79 vs. 0.03±0.17), 24 h (4.21±1.68 vs. 2.47±1.50), and 48h (4.55±1.83 vs. 1.94±1.29). FOB and VB showed association with PaO2-to-FiO2 ratios (PFR) with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC): for PFR≤300, VB 0.830, FOB 0.863; for PFR≤200, VB 0.794, FOB 0.825; for PFR≤100, VB 0.747, FOB 0.777 (all p<0.001). FOB showed 80.3% specificity, 77% sensitivity, 88.8% negative-predictive value (NPV), and 62.3% positive-predictive value (PPV) for PFR≤300 and VB showed 67.2% specificity, 85.5% sensitivity, 91.3% NPV, and 53.4% PPV., Conclusions: VB provided similar injury severity scores to FOB, correlated with PFR, and reliably detected airway narrowing. VB performed during admission CT may be a useful screening tool specifically to demonstrate airway narrowing induced by SII., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)