Search

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) significantly impairs quality of life and poses a substantial healthcare burden, affecting up to a quarter of patients undergoing surgery. Although acute pain is recognised as a predictor for CPSP development, the role of patient experience remains underexplored. This study examines the predictive value of patient experience alongside traditional risk factors for CPSP after orthopaedic surgery. An exploratory analysis was conducted on 294 patients from a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing continuous perineural analgesia and single-injection nerve block in ambulatory orthopaedic surgeries. Patient experience was assessed using the Evaluation du Vecu de l'Anesthésie Générale (EVAN-G) validated questionnaire. Factors associated with CPSP at 90 days after surgery were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses, incorporating patient-reported outcomes and classical variables. Out of 219 patients with complete data, 63 (29%) developed CPSP at day 90. Multivariate analysis revealed a poor pain experience, as assessed by the pain dimension of EVAN-G on postoperative day 2, as an independent predictor of CPSP (odds ratio 6.45, 95% confidence interval 1.65–25.26, P <0.01). Poor pain experience was associated with an augmented risk of CPSP. This study underscores the role of patient-reported outcomes, specifically the pain experience dimension captured by the EVAN-G scale, in prediction of CPSP 90 days after surgery. It suggests a shift from conventional assessments of pain intensity to a comprehensive understanding of pain experience, advocating for tailored pain management approaches that could reduce chronic pain, thereby improving patient quality of life and functional recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of erector spinae block (ESP) for postoperative pain management in low-resource settings. It compares ESP block with rectus sheath block in patients undergoing midline abdominal surgery and finds that ESP block reduces analgesic consumption. However, the article highlights the lack of robust research and publication bias surrounding fascial plane blocks, and cautions against interpreting study results too definitively. The authors stress the importance of patient-centered outcomes and call for further research to determine the optimal approach. They also discuss the limitations and uncertainties of ESP block. The article acknowledges a study by Urmale et al. that supports the effectiveness of ESP block, but emphasizes the need for more comprehensive trials with patient-centered outcomes. The authors advocate for considering cultural, socioeconomic, psychological, and individual patient differences in pain research, and suggest that multicenter studies should be the standard practice. They express gratitude to Urmale et al. for contributing to the discussion and promoting better peri-operative care. [Extracted from the article]

OBJECTIVES Postoperative pain remains a burden for patients after minimally invasive anatomic lung resection. Current guidelines recommend the intraoperative placement of intercostal catheters to promote faster recovery. This trial aimed to determine the analgesic efficacy of continuous loco-regional ropivacaine application via intercostal catheter and establish this method as a possible standard of care. METHODS Between December 2021 and October 2023, patients were randomly assigned to receive ropivacaine 0.2% or a placebo through an intercostal catheter with a flow rate of 6–8 ml/h for 72 h after surgery. Patients were undergoing anatomic VATS lung resection under general anaesthesia for confirmed or suspected stage I lung cancer (UICC, 8th edition). The sample size was calculated to assess a difference in numerical rating scale associated with pain reduction of 1.5 points. RESULTS Fourteen patients were included in the ropivacaine group, whereas the placebo group comprised 18 participants. Patient characteristics and preoperative pain scores were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption between the 2 groups. The mean numerical rating scale when coughing during the first 24 h postoperatively was 4.9 (SD: 2.2) in the ropivacaine group and 4.3 (SD: 2.4); P  = 0.47 in the placebo group. We were unable to determine any effect of administered ropivacaine on the postoperative pulmonary function (FEV1, PEF). CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary results suggest that continuous loco-regional ropivacaine administration via surgically placed intercostal catheter has no positive effect on postoperative pain scores or morphine requirements. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04939545 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As few anaesthetists provide lumbar erector spinae block for disc surgery, there is a need to provide training to enable a randomised controlled trial investigating analgesia after painful spinal surgery (NIHR153170). The primary objective of the study was to develop and measure the construct validity of a checklist for assessment of skills in performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae fascial plane injection using soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers. Twenty-four UK consultant regional anaesthetists completed two iterations of a Delphi questionnaire. The final checklist consisted of 11 steps conducive to best practice. Thereafter, we validated the checklist by comparing the performance of 12 experts with 12 novices, each performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae plane injections or fascia iliaca, serrato-pectoral (PEC II) and serratus injections, randomly allocated to the left and right sides of six soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers. Six expert, trained raters blinded to operator and site of block examined 120 videos each. The mean (95% confidence interval) internal consistency of the 11-item checklist for erector spinae plane injection was 0.72 (0.63–0.79) and interclass correlation was 0.88 (0.82–0.93). The checklist showed construct validity for lumbar and thoracic erector spinae injection, experts vs novices {median (interquartile range [range]) 8.0 (7.0–10.0 [1–11]) vs 7.0 (5.0–9.0 [4–11]), difference 1.5 (1.0–2.5), P <0.001}. Global rating scales showed construct validity for lumbar and thoracic erector spinae injection, 28.0 (24.0–31.0 [7–35]) vs 21.0 (17.0–24.0 [7–35]), difference 7.5 (6.0–8.5), P <0.001. The most difficult items to perform were identifying the needle tip before advancing and always visualising the needle tip. Instrument handling and flow of procedure were the areas of greatest difficulty on the global rating scale (GRS). Checklists and GRS scores correlated. There was homogeneity of regression slopes controlling for status, type of injection, and rater. Generalisability analysis showed a high reliability using the checklist and GRS for all fascial plane blocks (Rho [ρ2] 0.93–0.96: Phi [ϕ] 0.84–0.87). An 11-point checklist developed through a modified Delphi process to provide best practice guidance for fascial plane injection showed construct validity in performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae fascial plane injection in soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ni Eochagain and colleagues report that programmed intermittent bolus and continuous infusion regimens in continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block catheters produced similar quality of recovery (QoR-15) scores, pain scores, and use of rescue opioids after video-assisted thoracic surgery. This is a reassuring finding for practitioners without access to pumps with programmed intermittent bolus functionality. Nevertheless, it remains plausible that the benefit of one regimen over another might vary depending on the specific infusion parameters. There continues to be scope for research into optimising programmed intermittent bolus delivery and dosing regimens and identifying the most appropriate clinical applications for this mode of infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regional anaesthesia techniques, including the erector spinae fascial plane (ESP) block, reduce postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Fascial plane blocks rely on spread of local anaesthetic between muscle layers, and thus, intermittent boluses might increase their clinical effectiveness. We tested the hypothesis that postoperative ESP analgesia with a programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) regimen is better than a continuous infusion (CI) regimen in terms of quality of recovery after VATS. We undertook a prospective, double-blinded, randomised, controlled trial involving 60 patients undergoing VATS. All participants received ESP block catheters and were randomly assigned to CI or PIB of local anaesthetic regimen for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative respiratory function, opioid consumption, verbal rating pain score, time to first mobilisation, nausea, vomiting, and length of hospital stay. Overall QoR-15 scores at 24 h after VATS were similar (PIB 115.5 [interquartile range 107–125] vs CI 110 [93–128]; Δ<6, P =0.29). The only quality of recovery descriptor showing a significant difference was nausea and vomiting, which was favourable in the PIB group (10 [10–10] vs 10 [7–10]; P =0.03). Requirement for rescue antiemetics up to 24 h after surgery was lower in the PIB group (4 [14%] vs 11 [41%]; P =0.04). There were no differences in other secondary outcomes between groups. Delivering ESP block analgesia after VATS via a PIB regimen resulted in similar QoR-15 at 24 h compared with a CI regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women, often necessitating surgical intervention. While surgeries like lumpectomy can be performed under local anesthesia, more extensive procedures typically require general anesthesia. Awake breast cancer surgery has emerged as an alternative due to risks associated with general anesthesia and patient preference. Methods: This prospective observational study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks for awake breast surgery. Patients aged 18–80 years undergoing unilateral breast surgery were included, following ethical committee approval and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were prior breast surgery, coagulopathies, infections, allergies to local anesthetics, psychiatric disorders, body mass index over 40 kg/m², and chest deformities. The combination of interpectoral, pecto-serratus, and deep serratus plane blocks was used as the primary anesthetic method, with a superficial parasternal block added in cases where complete cutaneous coverage was not achieved. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled. The primary outcome, sufficient surgical anesthesia without deep sedation, was achieved in 15 patients. The combination of the aforementioned blocks proved effective, with an average surgery duration of 59.66 min, and propofol requirements averaging 1.77 mg/kg/hour. Most patients reported high satisfaction levels, and no early or late block-related complications were observed. Conclusion: The combination of fascial plane blocks is a viable option for awake breast cancer surgery, potentially eliminating the need for more invasive anesthesia techniques. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings in larger, homogeneous patient groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard of treatments for symptomatic gallstone disease. The aim of this study is to determine if postoperative opiate use is reduced with transversus abdominus plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) regional anaesthetic blocks compared to port site local anaesthetic (LA) infiltration. A prospective, randomised cohort study was conducted of adult patients who underwent an emergency LC between 25 April 2022 and 25 May 2023. An amount of 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine was infiltrated as either TAP and RS blocks or to port sites. Patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative opioid use were collected from the medical record. In total, 138 patients were enrolled in this study: 73 patients allocated to the LA to port sites cohort (52.9%) and 65 patients in the TAP and RS cohort (43.5%). The most common indication for surgery was acute cholecystitis. The average amount of opiate analgesia use was 115.2 mg in the LA group compared to 61.2 mg in the TAP and RS group (p < 0.05). Optimisation of postoperative pain allows for early recovery, improved patient satisfaction, and improved cost-effectiveness for the health service. With a trend towards multimodal analgesia, the uptake of TAP and RS regional anaesthesia may help to achieve this goal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The most effective way of delivering regional anaesthesia training and the best means of demonstrating competency have not been established. Clinical competency, based on the Dreyfus and Dreyfus lexicon, appears unachievable using current training approaches. Lessons should be taken from the worlds of music, chess, and sports. Modern skills training programmes should be built on an explicit and detailed understanding with measurement of a variety of factors such as perception, attention, psychomotor and visuospatial function, and kinesthetics, coupled with quantitative, accurate, and reliable measurement of performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of regional anaesthetic techniques for caesarean section and labour analgesia is necessary for quality-driven obstetric anaesthesia as required by European minimum standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments, which were issued by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy in 2020. The aim of this article is to evaluate the rate of caesarean sections performed using regional anaesthetic techniques and the rates of epidural, remifentanil-PCA, and meperidine analgesia for managing labour pain across the 14 Slovenian obstetric units, respectively. Methods: Data from the Slovenian National Perinatal Information System (NPIS) from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. Results: Spinal anaesthesia was used as a primary anaesthetic method (> 50% of elective caesarean sections) in a half of Slovenian obstetric units. For emergency caesarean sections, regional anaesthetic methods (spinal and epidural) were used in > 50% parturients in 3 obstetric units. Eight obstetric units had an epidural rate of >10%. The use of epidural analgesia has progressively increased in 9 of 14 obstetric units. Remifentanil has been routinely used in 6 obstetric units. Accordingly, the consumption of meperidine has dropped in all but one obstetric unit in Slovenia. Conclusion: In the past decade, considerable progress has been observed in obstetric anaesthesia practice in Slovenia. This is evident from the increased use of regional anaesthesia for caesarean section and labour analgesia. However, there are considerable discrepancies in anaesthetic practices between different obstetric units in Slovenia, a situation the parturients should be informed of well in advance to be able to choose the obstetric unit according to their labour and delivery preferences. In order to avoid the differences in the quality and accessibility of anaesthetic practice between units, it is necessary to increase the number of anaesthesiologists involved in obstetric anaesthesia to ensure 24/7 service of labour analgesia to be able to fulfill minimum European standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments.

Introduction: Hypotension after subarachnoid block is a common occurrence due to sympathetic blockade leading to vasodilation, which causes a decrease in cardiac preload and results in a decrease in cardiac output. Early detection of hypotension and prompt treatment during caesarean delivery under subarachnoid block is the primary responsibility of the anaesthesiologist. Aim: To evaluate and validate the Perfusion Index (PI) as a predictor of hypotension following Subarachnoid Block (SAB) in patients undergoing Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) and to assess the usefulness of perioperative pulse oximetry-derived PI as a monitoring tool. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective hospital-based observational study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology at BJMC Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India over a period from March 2020 to February 2021, that included 60 American Society of Anaesthesiolgy (ASA) II pregnant patients, divided into two groups (A and B) based on PI, who were planned for elective caesarean delivery under regional anaesthesia. Variables recorded included heart rate, blood pressure, SpO2, and PI at different time intervals. The quantitative data were presented as mean and standard deviation and compared using the Student’s t-test. Results: Demographic parameters of both groups A and B, such as mean age (26.93±3,24 years, 28.33±4.02 years), mean height (155.56±4.29 cm, 155.17±4.31 cm), mean weight (62.70±5.87 kg, 60.36±5 kg), Body Mass Index {BMI (25.92±2.42, 25.01±2.14 kg/m2)}, and gestational age (36.03±0.32, 36.53±0.32 weeks) respectively, were comparable between the two groups. There was a statistically significant drop in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) in both Group A and Group B after induction, from one minute to 70 minutes (p3.5 were at a higher risk of developing hypotension following a subarachnoid block compared to those with a baseline PI

Abstract Introduction Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women, often necessitating surgical intervention. While surgeries like lumpectomy can be performed under local anesthesia, more extensive procedures typically require general anesthesia. Awake breast cancer surgery has emerged as an alternative due to risks associated with general anesthesia and patient preference. Methods This prospective observational study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks for awake breast surgery. Patients aged 18–80 years undergoing unilateral breast surgery were included, following ethical committee approval and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were prior breast surgery, coagulopathies, infections, allergies to local anesthetics, psychiatric disorders, body mass index over 40 kg/m², and chest deformities. The combination of interpectoral, pecto-serratus, and deep serratus plane blocks was used as the primary anesthetic method, with a superficial parasternal block added in cases where complete cutaneous coverage was not achieved. Results Seventeen patients were enrolled. The primary outcome, sufficient surgical anesthesia without deep sedation, was achieved in 15 patients. The combination of the aforementioned blocks proved effective, with an average surgery duration of 59.66 min, and propofol requirements averaging 1.77 mg/kg/hour. Most patients reported high satisfaction levels, and no early or late block-related complications were observed. Conclusion The combination of fascial plane blocks is a viable option for awake breast cancer surgery, potentially eliminating the need for more invasive anesthesia techniques. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings in larger, homogeneous patient groups.

Systemic sclerosis or scleroderma is an uncommon autoimmune condition with a global incidence of 8 to 56 new cases per million per year, which commences from skin and progresses to affect multiple systems in the body. It is marked by abnormalities in blood vessels, sclerosis of connective tissues and atrophy of skin and internal organs. The systemic sclerosis treatment depends on the disease manifestation and are usually treated with vasodilators (for vasculopathy improvement and prevention of Raynaud’s phenomenon), prostacyclin analogues (for the prevention of Raynaud’s phenomenon refractory to oral vasodilators), immunosuppressants like methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, low dose corticosteroids (for the treatment of skin hardening, interstitial lung disease and inflammatory arthritis) and antifibrotics like endothelin receptor antagonists (for the treatment of pulmonary artery hypertension). Avascular necrosis in systemic sclerosis can arise as a result of the macrovascular and microvascular effects of vasculitis and corticosteroid therapy. The multisystem involvement of systemic sclerosis can impact every aspect of anaesthetic care especially airway management. During perioperative management, numerous systemic manifestations like pulmonary artery hypertension, interstitial lung disease and cardiac arrhythmia should be considered. The regional anaesthesia serves as a safe alternative to general anaesthesia and useful adjunct in the management of postoperative pain, but can be technically challenging. This case report described a 61-year-old female patient who had a history of systemic sclerosis for past 25 years and was scheduled for a total hip replacement due to avascular necrosis and secondary osteoarthritis of the left hip. The patient was having difficult cannulation, interstitial lung disease and anticipated difficult airway because of microstomia, limited mouth opening and limited flexion and extension at atlantooccipital joint. But the patient was successfully managed with combined spinal epidural anaesthesia, which provided effective pain control and minimised the perioperative risk associated with general anaesthesia.

Background and Aims: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a common procedure conducted under regional anaesthesia, providing real-time cerebral function monitoring. Many different combinations of regional cervical blocks exist, and most offer adequate analgesia in intraoperative and postoperative recovery. This research compares a superficial cervical plexus block (SCB) alone and combined with an ultrasound (US)-guided carotid sheath block (CSB). The primary objective was to explore the length of the sensory block after combining SCB and CSB. Methods: Patients scheduled for nonemergency CEA surgery were randomised into two cohorts. The Subject group (28 participants) received US-guided CSB and SCB. The Control group (31 participants) received only an SCB. Both groups received 0.5% levobupivacaine (2 mg/kg) along with 2% lidocaine (2 mg/kg). The sensory block time and its initiation, analgesia and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were recorded before and after the block. The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to evaluate analgesia every 2 h for 12 h post block. Analysis of variance, Mann–Whitney U or log-rank test was used to analyse the distinction of selected variables. Results: The demographic characteristics were comparable across the cohorts. The Subject group demonstrated a significantly accelerated onset of sensory block (P = 0.029) and an extended time to first analgesia (P = 0.003). The sensory block was also substantially extended in the Subject group (P = 0.040). Postoperative pain (NPRS ≥1) within the first 12 h was more recurrent in the Control group (P = 0.048). NLR showed minimal disparity between the groups (P = 0.125). Conclusion: Combining SCB and US-guided CSB effectively and safely extends postoperative analgesia for CEA surgery.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard of treatments for symptomatic gallstone disease. The aim of this study is to determine if postoperative opiate use is reduced with transversus abdominus plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) regional anaesthetic blocks compared to port site local anaesthetic (LA) infiltration. A prospective, randomised cohort study was conducted of adult patients who underwent an emergency LC between 25 April 2022 and 25 May 2023. An amount of 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine was infiltrated as either TAP and RS blocks or to port sites. Patient demographics, operative data, and postoperative opioid use were collected from the medical record. In total, 138 patients were enrolled in this study: 73 patients allocated to the LA to port sites cohort (52.9%) and 65 patients in the TAP and RS cohort (43.5%). The most common indication for surgery was acute cholecystitis. The average amount of opiate analgesia use was 115.2 mg in the LA group compared to 61.2 mg in the TAP and RS group (p < 0.05). Optimisation of postoperative pain allows for early recovery, improved patient satisfaction, and improved cost-effectiveness for the health service. With a trend towards multimodal analgesia, the uptake of TAP and RS regional anaesthesia may help to achieve this goal.

Effective training in regional anaesthesia (RA) is paramount to ensuring widespread competence. Technology-based learning has assisted other specialties in achieving more rapid procedural skill acquisition. If applicable to RA, technology-enhanced training has the potential to provide an effective learning experience and to overcome barriers to RA training. We review the current evidence base for use of innovative technologies in assisting learning of RA. Using scoping review methodology, three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched, identifying 158 relevant citations. Citations were screened against defined eligibility criteria with 27 studies selected for inclusion. Data relating to study details, technological learning interventions, and impact on learner experience were extracted and analysed. Seven different technologies were used to train learners in RA: artificial intelligence, immersive virtual reality, desktop virtual reality, needle guidance technology, robotics, augmented reality, and haptic feedback devices. Of 27 studies, 26 reported a positive impact of technology-enhanced RA training, with different technologies offering benefits for differing components of RA training. Artificial intelligence improved sonoanatomical knowledge and ultrasound skills for RA, whereas needle guidance technologies enhanced confidence and improved needling performance, particularly in novices. Immersive virtual reality allowed more rapid acquisition of needling skills, but its functionality was limited when combined with haptic feedback technology. User friendly technologies enhanced participant experience and improved confidence in RA; however, limitations in technology-assisted RA training restrict its widespread use. Technology-enhanced RA training can provide a positive and effective learning experience, with potential to reduce the steep learning curve associated with gaining RA proficiency. A combined approach to RA education, using both technological and traditional approaches, should be maintained as no single method has been shown to provide comprehensive RA training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusion Peripheral nerve blocks may provide better conditions for closed reduction of distal radius fractures as compared to other more frequently used modalities. In this systematic review, we evaluate existing evidence on the effect and harm of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures in adults.We performed a systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis including trials investigating the use of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures. Co‐primary outcomes were (1) the quality of the closed reduction measured as the proportion of participants needing surgery afterwards and (2) pain during closed reduction.Six trials (n = 312) met the inclusion criteria. One trial reported on the need for surgery with 4 of 25 participants receiving nerve block compared to 7 of 25 receiving haematoma block needing surgery (RR 0.57, 96.7% CI [0.19; 1.71], p = .50). Four trials reported pain during closed reduction. In a meta‐analysis, pain was not statistically significantly reduced with a nerve block (−2.1 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) points (0–10), 96.7% CI [−4.4; 0.2], p = .07, tau2 = 5.4, I2 = 97%, TSA‐adj. 95% CI [−11.5; 7.3]). No trial sequential boundaries were crossed, and the required information size was not met. Pre‐planned subgroup analysis on trials evaluating ultrasound guided peripheral nerve blocks (patients = 110) showed a significant decrease in ‘pain during reduction’ (−4.1 NRS, 96.7% CI [−5.5; −2.6], p < .01, tau2 = 0.9, I2 = 80%). All trial results were at high risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence was very low.The certainty of evidence on the effect of peripheral nerve blocks for closed reduction of distal radius fractures is currently very low. Peripheral nerve blocks performed with ultrasound guidance may potentially reduce pain during closed reduction. High‐quality clinical trials are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peripheral nerve blocks may be essential elements in a multimodal pain management regime following foot and ankle surgery. We assessed the effects of ankle blocks compared with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. We searched CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase for randomised clinical trials comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block or a sciatic nerve block for patients undergoing surgery of the foot or ankle. Our primary outcomes were duration of analgesia and cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption. We followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook, and performed meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We included five trials (362 participants) comparing ankle block with no intervention/sham block and three trials (247 participants) comparing ankle block with a sciatic nerve block. Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block (MD 431 min; 96.7% CI 208 to 654), but the evidence was very uncertain. Duration was decreased when compared with a sciatic nerve block (MD −410 min; 96.7% CI −462 to −358). The ankle block duration was probably important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain in both comparisons. Ankle block may increase the duration of analgesia when compared with no intervention/sham block, but the evidence was very uncertain, and decrease the duration of analgesia when compared with a sciatic nerve block. The ankle block duration was probably clinically important in both comparisons. The effects on cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption were very uncertain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hip replacement surgery can be painful; postoperative analgesia is crucial for comfort and to facilitate recovery. Regional anaesthesia can reduce pain and postoperative opioid requirements. The role of ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for analgesia after elective total hip arthroplasty is not well defined. This randomised trial evaluated its analgesic efficacy. Consenting participants (134) scheduled for elective primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block with ropivacaine 0.5% or sham block with saline. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. Additional outcomes included pain scores at 4, 8, 12, and 16 h, opioid-related side-effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritis), ability to perform physiotherapy on the first postoperative day, and physiotherapist-assessed quadriceps weakness. There were no significant differences in 24-h opioid consumption (block vs sham block, mean difference −3.2 mg oral morphine equivalent, 95% confidence interval −15.3 to 8.1 mg oral morphine equivalent, P =0.55) or any other prespecified outcomes. In patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block with ropivacaine did not confer a significant opioid-sparing effect compared with sham block. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes including pain scores, opioid-related side-effects, or ability to perform physiotherapy on the first postoperative day. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03069183). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design: Prospective randomized placebo controlled double blind trial. Objective: To examine the effect of ESP block after minimally invasive posterior stabilization for vertebral fractures on opioid consumption, pain, blood loss, disability level, and wound healing complications. Methodology: Patients indicated for minimal invasive posterior stabilisation were included to the study. Our primary outcome was the opioid consumption and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measured during the first 48 hours. Secondary outcomes used to measure the short-term outcome included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (PROST). Results: In total, 60 patients were included with a 93.3% follow-up. Average morphine consumption during the PACU (Post Anaesthesia Care Unit) period was 5.357 mg in ESP group and 8.607 mg in placebo group (P =.004). Average VAS during first 24 hour was 3.944 in ESP group and 5.193 in placebo group (P =.046). Blood loss was 14.8 g per screw in ESP group and 15.4 g in placebo group (P =.387). The day2 PROST value was 33.9 in ESP group and 28.8 in placebo group (P =.008) and after 4 weeks 55.2 in ESP group and 49.9 in placebo group (P =.036). No significant differences in ODI were detected. Conclusion: The use of ESP block in minimally invasive spinal surgery for posterior fracture stabilization leads to a significant reduction of opioid consumption during PACU stay by 37.7%. Reduction of opioid consumption was accompanied with lower pain (VAS). We found positive effect of the ESP block on short term outcome scores, but no effect on perioperative blood loss and wound healing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Anaesthesiologie & Intensivmedizin is the property of DGAI e.V. - Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin e.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article delves into specific nerve pathways and their role in hip joint innervation, highlighting the sensory and motor functions involved. It also discusses common clinical scenarios where knowledge of hip joint innervation is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment, such as in cases of hip pain, trauma, or postoperative management.

Simple Summary: Periorbital surgeries are painful procedures that require effective pain management, and regional anaesthesia is an essential tool used to achieve it. To desensitise the area of the head involved, blockade of the branches of the trigeminal nerve (ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular nerves) is warranted. This technique is well described and employed in human medicine, but the literature on veterinary medicine (dogs) is scarce. This study aims to assess and compare two ultrasound-guided approaches for trigeminal nerve block. Thirteen dog heads were utilised, and following a preliminary anatomical assessment, procedures were conducted using temporal and coronoid approaches. The needle was advanced under ultrasonographic guidance from the dorsal aspect of the temporal area or ventral to the zygomatic arch, respectively. A computed tomography scan was performed with the needles in place and repeated after injection of a contrast medium/tissue dye mixture. Dissection of the heads was immediately performed thereafter. Needle position, contrast distribution, and nerve staining were evaluated and compared between the two techniques. Results indicate no significant difference between both techniques. Both methods demonstrate adequate distribution, with minimal intracranial spread of the injectate. Both techniques are promising, although further studies in live animals are required. The trigeminal nerve is responsible for innervating the periorbita. Ultrasound-guided trigeminal block is employed in humans for trigeminal neuralgia or periorbital surgery. There are no studies evaluating this block in dogs. This study aims to evaluate and compare two approaches (coronoid and temporal) of the trigeminal nerve block. We hypothesised superior staining with the coronoid approach. Thirteen dog heads were used. After a preliminary anatomical study, two ultrasound-guided injections per head (right and left, coronoid and temporal approach, randomly assigned), with an injectate volume of 0.15 mL cm−1 of cranial length, were performed (iodinated contrast and tissue dye mixture). The ultrasound probe was placed over the temporal region, visualising the pterygopalatine fossa. For the temporal approach, the needle was advanced from the medial aspect of the temporal region in a dorsoventral direction. For the coronoid approach, it was advanced ventral to the zygomatic arch in a lateromedial direction. CT scans and dissections were conducted to assess and compare the position of the needle, the spread of the injectate, and nerve staining. No significant differences were found. Both approaches demonstrated the effective interfascial distribution of the injectate, with some minimal intracranial spread. Although the coronoid approach did not yield superior staining as hypothesised, it presents a viable alternative to the temporal approach. Studies in live animals are warranted to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regional anaesthesia in children is a growing field of interest in current anaesthesia practice. We report a case of brachial plexus block for a child with severe forearm necrotizing fasciitis and septicaemia. The need to avoid the multiple shortcomings of general anaesthesia in a critically ill child prompted the use of regional anaesthesia. This case is reported to highlight the prospect of regional anaesthesia for critically ill children who require surgical interventions in resource- poor settings.

Introduction. Currently, the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block is widely used both as an independent method of anesthesia and as a component of multimodal anesthesia. It creates an extensive sensor block, spreads over 5 – 7 spinal segments.Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of ESP block as a component of multimodal anesthesia during open kidney surgery.Material & methods. The studies were conducted on 116 patients of ASA class I – III at the age of 18 – 85 years All patients were performed inhalation anesthesia with Isoflurane. NSAID (Diclofenac 75 mg IM) was administered as pre-emptive analgesia. In the Study group (n = 60), after tracheal intubation and positioning, an ESP block was performed under ultrasound control at the Th-9 level with a 0.5% Sol. Bupivacaine (25 – 30 ml). In the Control group (n = 56), only inhalation anesthesia was performed. Pain severity, opioid consumption frequency (Sol. Promedoli), postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed in the postoperative period. A numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to assess pain, which was recorded every 6 hours during the day.Results. Patients in the study group showed a low assessment of postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale compared to the Control group (p < 0.001). The consumption of opiates (Sol. Promedoli) was also lower, especially in the first 6 hours after surgery (p < 0.001).Conclusions. The results of our studies confirmed the efficiency of ESP block by reducing the consumption of opiates and NSAIDs. The main advantage of this method is its ease of implementation and safety.

Background Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is commonly used in hepatectomy patients since it is opioid-sparing. However, TEA has a high failure rate and is associated with potentially devastating complications (spinal haematoma) and the risk is increased with hepatectomy. Thus, some centres favour systemic opioid-based modalities which, in turn, are associated with inferior analgesia and well-known risks/side-effects. Hence, alternative analgesic methods are desirable. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been used in liver resection with advantages including haemodynamic stability, low failure rates, and low risk of spinal haematoma. The purpose of this pilot RCT is to compare continuous TEA (traditional standard of care is local anesthetic (LA) + opioids) with PVB (traditional standard of care is with LA without opioid) for patients undergoing hepatectomy. We hypothesise that pain outcomes will be comparable between groups, but PVB patients will require fewer perioperative vasopressors/blood products, have fewer opioid-related side effects and a shorter hospital length of stay. Methods With ethics approval, this non-inferiority, pilot RCT with a convenience sample of 50 hepatectomy patients will examine whether PVB imparts analgesia comparable to TEA but with fewer adverse effects. Primary outcomes are surrogates of analgesia for 72 h postoperatively (i.e., opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request and pain scores at rest and with coughing); Secondary outcomes are blood products/fluids administered; side effects/complications until 72 h postoperatively; length of hospital stay. The results will be used to plan a large multicentre trial comparing TEA vs. PVB in hepatectomy patients. This study has a high potential to positively impact the quality/safety of patient care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02909322 (09-21-2016); Available at URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT0290932

Background Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is commonly used in hepatectomy patients since it is opioid-sparing and reduces cardiorespiratory complications. However, TEA has a high failure rate and is associated with potentially devastating complications (particularly spinal haematoma) and the risk is increased with hepatectomy. Thus, some centres favour systemic opioid-based modalities which, in turn, are associated with inferior analgesia and well-known risks/side-effects. Hence, alternative analgesic methods are desirable. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been used in liver resection with advantages including haemodynamic stability, low failure rates, and low risk of spinal haematoma. Our purpose is to conduct a blinded, pilot RCT with hepatectomy patients randomised to receive TEA or PVB for perioperative analgesia. We hypothesise that opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, and pain scores will be comparable between groups, but PVB patients will require fewer perioperative vasopressors/blood products, and have fewer adverse events and a shorter hospital stay. Methods With ethics approval, this non-inferiority, pilot RCT with a convenience sample of 50 hepatectomy patients will examine whether PVB imparts analgesia comparable to TEA but with fewer adverse effects. Primary outcomes are surrogates of analgesia for 72 h postoperatively (i.e., opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request and pain scores at rest and with coughing); Secondary outcomes are blood products/fluids administered; side effects/complications until 72 h postoperatively; length of hospital stay. The results will be used to plan a large multicentre trial comparing TEA vs. PVB in hepatectomy patients. This study has a high potential to positively impact the quality/safety of patient care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02909322 (09-21-2016); Available at URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT0290932

Simple Summary: The celiac plexus (CP) is a dense network of ganglia and sensitive fibres receiving nociceptive inputs from most abdominal viscera. In human medicine, the CP is a therapeutic target to control pain originating from pancreatic tumours and chronic pancreatitis. The fluoroscopic-guided block and neurolysis of the CP are commonly used in human analgesia but they have not been described in animals. We describe a fluoroscopically guided transcutaneous approach to the CP in swine cadavers to assess the feasibility of the technique in veterinary species. This technique is shown to be feasible, and its application in veterinary subjects suffering abdominal pain should be assessed. Celiac plexus block (CPB) and neurolysis (CPN) are used for pain management in people suffering from abdominal tumours or chronic pancreatitis. The fluoroscopically guided approach common in human medicine has not been described in veterinary settings. The aim of this study was to describe a fluoroscopic approach to the celiac plexus (CP) in fresh pig cadavers. Twelve animals were included in the procedure. Cadavers were positioned in sternal position and, under fluoroscopic guidance, a Chiba needle was inserted parasagittal at 6 cm from the spinal midline at the level of the last thoracic vertebra. From the left side, the needle was directed medio-ventrally with a 45° angle towards the T15 vertebral body; once the vertebral body was contacted, the needle was advanced 1 cm ventrally towards the midline. Iodinated contrast was injected to confirm the location. Following this, 2 mL of dye (China ink) was injected. A laparotomy was performed, and dyed tissue was dissected and prepared for both histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques. In 10 out of 12 samples submitted for histological evaluation, nervous tissue belonging to CP was observed. Fluoroscopy guidance allows for feasible access to the CP in swine cadavers in this study. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of this technique in swine and other veterinary species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intravenous (IV) medication administration error remains a major concern during the perioperative period. This review examines inadvertent IV anaesthesia induction agent administration via high‑risk routes. Using Medline and Google Scholar, the author searched published reports of inadvertent administration via neuraxial (intrathecal, epidural), peripheral nerve or plexus or intracerebroventricular (ICV) route. The author applied the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework to identify systemic and human factors. Among 14 patients involved, thiopentone was administered via the epidural route in six patients. Four errors involved the routes of ICV (propofol and etomidate one each) or lumbar intrathecal (propofol infusion and etomidate bolus). Intrathecal thiopentone was associated with cauda equina syndrome in one patient. HFACS identified suboptimal handling of external ventricular and lumbar drains and deficiencies in the transition of care. Organisational policy to improve the handling of neuraxial devices, use of technological tools and improvements in identified deficiencies in preconditions before drug preparation and administration may minimise future risks of inadvertent IV induction agent administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the perioperative cumulative opioid consumption and the incidence of cardiovascular complications in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy in which either an erector spinae plane (ESP) block or systemic opioids were administered. Prospective randomized clinical trial. A total of 60 client-owned dogs. Dogs were randomized to one of three groups: an ESP block (group ESP), a constant rate infusion of fentanyl (group FNT, positive control) or a single dose of methadone as premedication (group MTD, negative control). Intraoperative nociceptive response was treated with fentanyl [1 μg kg–1, intravenously (IV)] boli. Before closure of the surgical site, morphine (0.1 mg kg–1) was applied to the dura mater. The cumulative dose of opioids was recorded and compared between groups. The incidence of intraoperative bradycardia and/or hypotension and the time to extubation were compared between groups. The short form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (SF-GCPS) was used to score nociception before anaesthetic induction and 1, 2, 6, 12,18 and 24 hours postoperatively. Methadone 0.2 mg kg–1 was administered IV if the SF-GCPS score was ≥ 5. Group MTD required more intraoperative rescue analgesia than groups ESP (p = 0.008) and FNT (p = 0.001). The total cumulative intraoperative dose of fentanyl was higher in groups FNT (p < 0.0001) and MTD (p = 0.002) than in group ESP. The incidence of cardiovascular complications was similar between groups. Extubation time was longer in group MTD (p = 0.03). Postoperatively, the time to first rescue analgesia was longer in group ESP than in group MTD (p = 0.03). The cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores were similar between groups. The ESP block resulted in a reduced intraoperative opioid consumption compared with the control positive and negative groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In high-resource countries, health disparities exist in both treatment approaches and health outcomes. Race and ethnicity can serve as proxies for other socioeconomic factors and social determinants of health such as income, education, social support, and residential neighbourhood, which strongly influence health outcomes and disparities. In regional anaesthesia and pain medicine, disparities exist across several surgical specialties including obstetrics, paediatrics, and orthopaedic surgery. Understanding these disparities will facilitate development of solutions aimed at eliminating disparities at the patient, physician/provider, and healthcare system levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To coincide with the annual scientific meeting of Regional Anaesthesia UK in London 2024, where there is a joint scientific session with the British Journal of Anaesthesia , a special regional anaesthesia edition of the journal has been produced. This editorial offers some highlights from the manuscripts contained within the special edition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block spread can be unpredictable. We previously improved the spread of ESP injection by addition of retrolaminar (RL) injection. However, it is not clear whether spread at high thoracic levels is similar to spread at midthoracic levels. Our primary objective was to demonstrate that craniocaudal dye spread was equivalent after combined ESP and RL injection using a 19 G Tuohy needle at the third (T3) and sixth (T6) vertebrae in soft embalmed Thiel cadavers. We randomised 20 combined ESP and RL injections to the T3 and T6 vertebral levels on both sides of 10 prone Thiel cadavers. A 3–8 MHz transducer was placed in the paramedian sagittal plane and a single anaesthetist injected 10 ml dye onto the transverse process, then 10 ml dye onto the laminae of T3 or T6. Cadavers were dissected 24 h later. Mean (sd) craniocaudal spread of dye after combined ESP + RL injection at T3 and T6 vertebral levels was equivalent: 8.6 (1.8) vs 8.7 (2.3) levels, respectively; difference (90% confidence interval): –0.1 (–1.4 to 1.6), P =0.904. Dye extended uniformly, cranially and caudally, from the point of injection. A 3D prosection created from a Thiel cadaver confirmed that the dorsal ramus emerges from the costotransverse foramen deep to the intertransverse ligament within the retro-superior costotransverse ligament space. Combined ESP and RL block in six patients before mastectomy achieved extensive anterior, lateral, and posterior chest wall paraesthesia over four to six dermatomes. Combined ESP and RL injections showed equivalent and consistent spread at T3 and T6 injection sites. A pilot study confirmed translation to patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Artificial intelligence (AI) for ultrasound scanning in regional anaesthesia is a rapidly developing interdisciplinary field. There is a risk that work could be undertaken in parallel by different elements of the community but with a lack of knowledge transfer between disciplines, leading to repetition and diverging methodologies. This scoping review aimed to identify and map the available literature on the accuracy and utility of AI systems for ultrasound scanning in regional anaesthesia. A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. Clinical trial registries, a registry of doctoral theses, regulatory authority databases, and websites of learned societies in the field were searched. Online commercial sources were also reviewed. In total, 13,014 sources were identified; 116 were included for full-text review. A marked change in AI techniques was noted in 2016–17, from which point on the predominant technique used was deep learning. Methods of evaluating accuracy are variable, meaning it is impossible to compare the performance of one model with another. Evaluations of utility are more comparable, but predominantly gained from the simulation setting with limited clinical data on efficacy or safety. Study methodology and reporting lack standardisation. There is a lack of structure to the evaluation of accuracy and utility of AI for ultrasound scanning in regional anaesthesia, which hinders rigorous appraisal and clinical uptake. A framework for consistent evaluation is needed to inform model evaluation, allow comparison between approaches/models, and facilitate appropriate clinical adoption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regional anaesthesia use is growing worldwide, and there is an increasing emphasis on research in regional anaesthesia to improve patient outcomes. However, priorities for future study remain unclear. We therefore conducted an international research prioritisation exercise, setting the agenda for future investigators and funding bodies. We invited members of specialist regional anaesthesia societies from six continents to propose research questions that they felt were unanswered. These were consolidated into representative indicative questions, and a literature review was undertaken to determine if any indicative questions were already answered by published work. Unanswered indicative questions entered a three-round modified Delphi process, whereby 29 experts in regional anaesthesia (representing all participating specialist societies) rated each indicative question for inclusion on a final high priority shortlist. If ≥75% of participants rated an indicative question as 'definitely' include in any round, it was accepted. Indicative questions rated as 'definitely' or 'probably' by <50% of participants in any round were excluded. Retained indicative questions were further ranked based on the rating score in the final Delphi round. The final research priorities were ratified by the Delphi expert group. There were 1318 responses from 516 people in the initial survey, from which 71 indicative questions were formed, of which 68 entered the modified Delphi process. Eleven 'highest priority' research questions were short listed, covering themes of pain management; training and assessment; clinical practice and efficacy; technology and equipment. We prioritised unanswered research questions in regional anaesthesia. These will inform a coordinated global research strategy for regional anaesthesia and direct investigators to address high-priority areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regional anaesthesia plays an important role in perioperative care, but gaps in proficiency persist among consultants and specialists. This study aimed to assess confidence levels in performing Plan A blocks among this cohort and to examine the barriers and facilitators influencing regional anaesthesia education. Utilising a mixed-methods design, we performed a quantitative survey to gauge self-reported confidence in performing Plan A blocks, coupled with qualitative interviews to explore the complexities of educational barriers and facilitators. UK consultant and specialist anaesthetists were included in the study. A total of 369 survey responses were analysed. Only 22% of survey respondents expressed confidence in performing all Plan A blocks. Specialists (odds ratio [OR] 0.391, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.179–0.855, P =0.016) and those in their roles for >10 yr (OR 0.551, 95% CI 0.327–0.927, P = 0.024) reported lower confidence levels. A purposive sample was selected for interviews, and data saturation was reached at 31 interviews. Peer-led learning emerged as the most effective learning modality for consultants and specialists. Barriers to regional anaesthesia education included apprehensions regarding complications, self-perceived incompetence, lack of continuing professional development time, insufficient support from the multidisciplinary team, and a lack of inclusivity within the regional anaesthesia community. Organisational culture had a substantial impact, with the presence of local regional anaesthesia champions emerging as a key facilitator. This study highlights persistent perceived deficiencies in regional anaesthesia skills among consultants and specialists. We identified multiple barriers and facilitators, providing insights for targeted interventions aimed at improving regional anaesthesia education in this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The conduct and reporting of studies with a noninferiority hypothesis is challenging because of the complexity involved in their design and interpretation. However, studies with a noninferiority design have increased in popularity. A recently published trial reported on the noninferiority of lidocaine infusion to epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgeries. Apart from needing a critical appraisal, this draws attention to improve our understanding of noninferiority study framework and its unique features. Given the increasing focus on using various analgesic adjuncts and multiple approaches to fascial plane blocks to avoid more definitive and standard approaches, it is imperative that particular attention is paid to appropriate execution and reporting of noninferiority studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significant acute postoperative pain remains prevalent among patients who undergo truncal surgery and is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged patient recovery, and increased healthcare costs. The provision of high-quality postoperative analgesia is an important component of postoperative care, particularly within enhanced recovery programmes. Regional anaesthetic techniques have become increasingly prevalent within multimodal analgesic regimens and the widespread adoption of ultrasonography has facilitated the development of novel fascial plane blocks. The number of described fascial plane blocks has increased significantly over the past decade, leading to a burgeoning area of clinical investigation. Their applications are increasing, and truncal fascial plane blocks are increasingly recommended as part of procedure-specific guidelines. Some fascial plane blocks have been shown to be more efficacious than others, with favourable side-effect profiles compared with neuraxial analgesia, and are increasingly utilised in breast, thoracic, and other truncal surgery. However, use of these blocks is debated in regional anaesthesia circles because of limitations in our understanding of their mechanisms of action. This narrative review evaluates available evidence for the analgesic efficacy of the most commonly practised fascial plane blocks in breast, thoracic, and abdominal truncal surgery, in particular their efficacy compared with systemic analgesia, alternative blocks, and neuraxial techniques. We also highlight areas where investigations are ongoing and suggest priorities for original investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A recent study by Suissa and colleagues explored the clinical relevance of a medical image segmentation metric (Dice metric) commonly used in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). They showed that pixel-wise agreement for physician identification of structures on ultrasound images is variable, and a relatively low Dice metric (0.34) correlated to a substantial agreement on subjective clinical assessment. We highlight the need to bring structure and clinical perspective to the evaluation of medical AI, which clinicians are best placed to direct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Superiority of perineural over intravenous dexamethasone at extending nerve block analgesia has been suggested but without considering the dose–response relationships for each route of administration. Randomised control studies that evaluated intravenous or perineural dexamethasone as an adjuvant to unilateral peripheral nerve blocks in adults were searched up to October 2023 in MEDLINE, Central, Google Scholar, and reference lists of previous systematic reviews. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool was used. A maximum effect (E max) model-based network meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the dose–response relationships of dexamethasone. A total of 118 studies were selected (9284 patients; 35 with intravenous dexamethasone; 106 with perineural dexamethasone; dose range 1–16 mg). Studies with unclear or high risk of bias overestimated the effect of dexamethasone. Bias-corrected estimates indicated a maximum fold increase in analgesia duration of 1.7 (95% credible interval (CrI) 1.4–1.9) with dexamethasone, with no difference between perineural and intravenous routes. Trial simulations indicated that 4 mg of perineural dexamethasone increased the mean duration of analgesia for long-acting local anaesthetics from 11.1 h (95% CrI 9.4–13.1) to 16.5 h (95% CrI 14.0–19.3) and halved the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A similar magnitude of effect was observed with 8 mg of intravenous dexamethasone. Used as an adjuvant for peripheral nerve block, intravenous dexamethasone can be as effective as perineural dexamethasone in prolonging analgesic duration, but is less potent, hence requiring higher doses. The evidence is limited because of the observational nature of the dose–response relationships and the quality of the included studies. PROSPERO CRD42020141689. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ScanNav TM Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block (ScanNav™) is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based device that produces a colour overlay on real-time B-mode ultrasound to highlight key anatomical structures for regional anaesthesia. This study compares consistency of identification of sono-anatomical structures between expert ultrasonographers and ScanNav™. Nineteen experts in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia (UGRA) annotated 100 structures in 30 ultrasound videos across six anatomical regions. These annotations were compared with each other to produce a quantitative assessment of the level of agreement amongst human experts. The AI colour overlay was then compared with all expert annotations. Differences in human–human and human–AI agreement are presented for each structure class (artery, muscle, nerve, fascia/serosal plane) and structure. Clinical context is provided through subjective assessment data from UGRA experts. For human–human and human–AI annotations, agreement was highest for arteries (mean Dice score 0.88/0.86), then muscles (0.80/0.77), and lowest for nerves (0.48/0.41). Wide discrepancy exists in consistency for different structures, both with human–human and human–AI comparisons; highest for sartorius muscle (0.91/0.92) and lowest for the radial nerve (0.21/0.27). Human experts and the AI system both showed the same pattern of agreement in sono-anatomical structure identification. The clinical significance of the differences presented must be explored; however the perception that human expert opinion is uniform must be challenged. Elements of this assessment framework could be used for other devices to allow consistent evaluations that inform clinical training and practice. Anaesthetists should be actively engaged in the development and adoption of new AI technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]