Search

For glioblastoma patients, the efficacy-targeted therapy is limited to date. Most of the molecular therapies previously studied are lacking efficacy in this population. More trials are needed to study the actual actionability of biomarkers in (recurrent) glioblastoma. This study aimed to assess the current clinical trial landscape to assess the role of molecular biomarkers in trials on recurrent glioblastoma treatment. The database ClinicalTrials.gov was used to identify not yet completed clinical trials on recurrent glioblastoma in adults. Recruiting studies were assessed to investigate the role of molecular criteria, which were retrieved as detailed as possible. Primary outcome was molecular criteria used as selection criteria for study participation. Next to this, details on moment and method of testing, and targets and drugs studied, were collected. In 76% (181/237) of the included studies, molecular criteria were not included in the study design. Of the remaining 56 studies, at least one specific genomic alteration as selection criterium for study participation was required in 33 (59%) studies. Alterations in EGFR, CDKN2A/B or C, CDK4/6, and RB were most frequently investigated, as were the corresponding drugs abemaciclib and ribociclib. Of the immunotherapies, CAR-T therapies were the most frequently studied therapies. Previously, genomics studies have revealed the presence of potentially actionable alterations in glioblastoma. Our study shows that the potential efficacy of targeted treatment is currently not translated into genome-driven trials in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. An intensification of genome-driven trials might help in providing evidence for (in)efficacy of targeted treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies have shown efficacy in various tumors, but long-term responses in glioblastoma are less than 10%. Quantifying tumor in situ fluid circulating tumor DNA (TISF-ctDNA) and therapeutic dynamics may enable real-time GBM disease burden evaluation. This study explores the potential of tumor in situ fluid circulating tumor DNA (TISF-ctDNA) dynamics in predicting treatment efficacy. Methods: TISF and peripheral blood samples were collected from patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) undergoing tislelizumab (a programmed death 1 inhibitor) combined with low-dose bevacizumab (an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody) treatment before and during each immunotherapy cycle. Biomarkers evaluated included TISF-ctDNA, measured using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), and host inflammation markers such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Results: All 32 patients received tislelizumab plus low-dose bevacizumab regularly. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months, and overall survival (OS) was 22.3 months. An analysis of 19 patients with continuous evaluable TISF showed baseline TISF-ctDNA abundance did not correlate with OS (p = 0.23) or PFS (p = 0.23). However, a change in TISF-ctDNA maximal Somatic Variant Allelic Frequency (MVAF) after six treatment cycles predicted both PFS (p = 0.02) and OS (p < 0.0001). Lower baseline PLR also correlated with better survival outcomes. Conclusion: The combination of tislelizumab and low-dose bevacizumab therapy appears to be effective in extending both OS and PFS in rGBM patients. Continuous TISF-ctDNA testing shows potential utility in complementing radiological monitoring. The temporal change pattern of TISF MVAF is more predictive of immunotherapy response than imaging. PLR before immunotherapy can screen patients likely to benefit from tislelizumab plus low-dose bevacizumab therapy. Trial registration: The trial registration number: NCT05502991; Date of registration: 2022-08-14. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive tumor, and despite standard-of-care therapy, tumor recurrence is inevitable. Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains a challenge to treat, given that it predominantly forms within a highly inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME) that contributes to treatment resistance. However, the complex immune landscape of rGBM and how to effectively characterize it for therapeutic targeting remains poorly understood. To address this gap, this review exhaustively examines the existing body of literature on the immune characteristics of rGBM with a focus on the role of glioma-associated microglia and macrophages (GAMMs). We examine this inflammatory landscape through the lens of histological-based assessments given histological staining remains the gold standard of diagnostic identification of rGBM. We review canonical and emerging cell-specific markers of GAMMs and provide a guide of how these histological-based assessments can aid in characterizing the TME of rGBM and dissect how this landscape shifts in the context of treatment response. The glioblastoma (GBM) tumor microenvironment consists of a heterogeneous mixture of neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells, including immune cells. Tumor recurrence following standard-of-care therapy results in a rich landscape of inflammatory cells throughout the glioma-infiltrated cortex. Immune cells consisting of glioma-associated macrophages and microglia (GAMMs) overwhelmingly constitute the bulk of the recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) microenvironment, in comparison to the highly cellular and proliferative tumor microenvironment characteristic of primary GBM. These immune cells dynamically interact within the tumor microenvironment and can contribute to disease progression and therapy resistance while also providing novel targets for emerging immunotherapies. Within these varying contexts, histological-based assessments of immune cells in rGBM, including immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF), offer a critical way to visualize and examine the inflammatory landscape. Here, we exhaustively review the available body of literature on the inflammatory landscape in rGBM as identified through histological-based assessments. We highlight the heterogeneity of immune cells throughout the glioma-infiltrated cortex with a focus on microglia and macrophages, drawing insights from canonical and novel immune-cell histological markers to estimate cell phenotypes and function. Lastly, we discuss opportunities for immunomodulatory treatments aiming to harness the inflammatory landscape in rGBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant brain tumor among adults. Despite advancements in multimodality therapy for GBM, the overall prognosis remains poor, with an extremely high risk of recurrence. Currently, there is no established consensus on the optimal treatment option for recurrent GBM, which may include reoperation, reirradiation, chemotherapy, or a combination of the above. Bevacizumab is considered a first-line treatment option for recurrent GBM, as is temozolomide. However, in recurrent GBM, it is necessary to balance the risks and benefits of reirradiation in combination with bevacizumab and temozolomide. Herein, we report the case of a patient with recurrent GBM after standard treatment who benefited from stereotactic radiotherapy followed by bevacizumab and temozolomide maintenance therapy. Following 16 months of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), the patient was diagnosed with recurrent GBM by a 3-T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The addition of localized radiotherapy to the ongoing treatment regimen of bevacizumab, in combination with temozolomide therapy, prolonged the patient's disease-free survival to over 2 years, achieving a significant long-term outcome, with no notable adverse effects observed. This clinical case may provide a promising new option for patients with recurrent GBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The survival of glioblastoma (GBM) patients remains at just 12–15 months with a 5% 5 year survival despite them undergoing a harsh and brutal treatment regimen involving surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. This is because GBMs are impossible to completely resect and almost always recur at the borders of the resection margin, while the presence of the blood–brain barrier limits the amount of chemotherapy that can access the brain, requiring the patient to receive high and extremely toxic doses of chemotherapy. In this study, we demonstrate that local delivery of the chemotherapeutic drug irinotecan directly into the border of the resection margin offers a safe route of administration with none of the normal side effects associated with traditional chemotherapy. Glioblastomas are impossible to completely resect and almost always recur at the borders of the resection margin. There is no established chemotherapy regimen available to patients who recur, while systemic treatment is hampered by the blood–brain barrier. Here, we report on the first evaluation in humans of the intraparenchymal injection of irinotecan into the resection cavity after surgical resection of recurrent glioblastoma patients. The cytotoxicity of irinotecan was compared to SN-38 in primary cells from recurrent glioblastoma patients. Irinotecan was injected at multiple (~30) sites of the resection cavity wall at a depth of 3 to 5 mm. SN-38 was more cytotoxic than irinotecan at concentrations below 1 µM due to enzyme kinetics. The intraparenchymal administration of irinotecan was safe, with good wound healing and an absence of swelling, inflammation, or pseudo-abscess formation. The median survival post irinotecan administration was 32.6 weeks. The median overall survival was 30.5 months, with a two-year survival rate of 56%. This study demonstrates that local delivery of irinotecan into the brain parenchyma offers a safe route of administration over systemic delivery in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: In patients with recurrent glioblastoma, very little data are available regarding the prognostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratios. This study investigated potential associations between PLR or NLR and treatment outcomes. Patients and Methods: PLR and NLR at diagnosis of recurrence plus 10 additional characteristics were retrospectively analyzed for associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 75 patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Results: On multivariate analyses, maximal cumulative diameter of recurrent lesion(s) <40 mm (p=0.015) and systemic therapy (p<0.001) were associated with improved PFS. On multivariate analysis of OS, improved outcomes were significantly associated with PLR ≤150 (p=0.029), maximal cumulative diameter <40 mm (p=0.030), and systemic therapy (p=0.010). Conclusion: In addition to other characteristics, PLR at the time of recurrence was identified as an independent predictor of OS in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. PLR may be useful when designing personalized treatment approaches or clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In contrast to standard-of-care treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, there is limited consensus on therapy upon disease progression. The role of resection for recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. This study aimed to identify factors for overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) as well as to validate an existing prediction model. Methods: This was a multi-centre retrospective study that reviewed consecutive adult patients from 2006 to 2019 that received a repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma. The primary endpoint was PPS defined as from the date of second surgery until death. Results: 1032 glioblastoma patients were identified and 190 (18%) underwent resection for recurrence. Patients that had second surgery were more likely to be younger (<70 years) (adjusted OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1–0.6), to have non-eloquent region tumours (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.6) and received temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (aOR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1–0.4). Resection for recurrent tumour was an independent predictor for OS (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3–1.7) (mOS: 16.9 months versus 9.8 months). For patients that previously received temozolomide chemoradiotherapy and subsequent repeat resection (137, 13%), the median PPS was 9.0 months (IQR: 5.0–17.5). Independent PPS predictors for this group were a recurrent tumour volume of >50cc (aOR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4–0.9), local recurrence (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–3.3) and 5-ALA fluorescence-guided resection during second surgery (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.8). A National Institutes of Health Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Scale score of 0 conferred an mPPS of 10.0 months, a score of 1–2, 9.0 months and a score of 3, 4.0 months (log-rank test, p-value < 0.05). Conclusion: Surgery for recurrent glioblastoma can be beneficial in selected patients and carries an acceptable morbidity rate. The pattern of recurrence influenced PPS and the NIH Recurrent GBM Scale was a reliable prognostication tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is a brain tumor that is resistant to standard treatments. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive radiation technique, it cannot fully prevent tumor recurrence and progression. Bevacizumab blocks tumor blood supply and has been approved for rGBM. However, the best way to combine SRS and bevacizumab is still unclear. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing SRS alone and SRS plus bevacizumab for rGBM. We searched three databases for articles published until June 2023. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA v.17. Our meta-analysis included 20 studies with 926 patients. We found that the combination therapy had a significantly lower rate of overall survival (OS) than SRS alone at 6-month 0.77[95%CI:0.74–0.85] for SRS alone and (100%) for SRS plus bevacizumab. At 1-year OS, 0.39 [95%CI: 0.32–0.47] for SRS alone and 0.61 [95%CI:0.44–0.77] for SRS plus bevacizumab (P-value:0.02). However, this advantage was not seen in the long term (18 months and two years). Additionally, the combination therapy had lower chances of progression-free survival (PFS) than SRS alone at the 6-month and 1-year time points, but the differences were insignificant. Our study indicates that incorporating bevacizumab with SRS may lead to a short-term increase in OS for rGBM patients but not long-term. Additionally, the PFS rate did not show significant improvement in the group receiving combination therapy. Further clinical trials are necessary to validate the enhanced overall survival with combination therapy for rGBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increased use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) in neuro-oncology for diagnostics and research purposes necessitates a renewed conversation about informed consent procedures and governance structures for sharing personal health data. There is currently no consensus on how to obtain informed consent for WGS in this population. In this narrative review, we analyze the formats and contents of frameworks suggested in literature for WGS in oncology and assess their benefits and limitations. We discuss applicability, specific challenges, and legal context for patients with (recurrent) glioblastoma. This population is characterized by the rarity of the disease, extremely limited prognosis, and the correlation of the stage of the disease with cognitive abilities. Since this has implications for the informed consent procedure for WGS, we suggest that the content of informed consent should be tailor-made for (recurrent) glioblastoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glioblastoma is the most common and lethal central nervous system malignancy with a median survival after progression of only 6–9 months. Major biochemical mechanisms implicated in glioblastoma recurrence include aberrant molecular pathways, a recurrence-inducing tumor microenvironment, and epigenetic modifications. Contemporary standard-of-care (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and tumor treating fields) helps to control the primary tumor but rarely prevents relapse. Cytoreductive treatment such as surgery has shown benefits in recurrent glioblastoma; however, its use remains controversial. Several innovative treatments are emerging for recurrent glioblastoma, including checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, oncolytic virotherapy, nanoparticle delivery, laser interstitial thermal therapy, and photodynamic therapy. This review seeks to provide readers with an overview of (1) recent discoveries in the molecular basis of recurrence; (2) the role of surgery in treating recurrence; and (3) novel treatment paradigms emerging for recurrent glioblastoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have had success with various malignancies, their efficacy in brain cancer is still unclear. Retrospective and prospective studies using PD-1 inhibitors for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) have not established survival benefit. This study evaluated if ICI may be effective for select patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with first recurrence GBM and received pembrolizumab or nivolumab with or without concurrent bevacizumab. Archival tissue was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and targeted DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. RESULTS: Median overall survival (mOS) from initial diagnosis was 24.5 months (range 10-42). mOS from onset of ICI was 10 months (range 1-31) with 75% surviving > 6 months and 46% > 12 months. Additional IHC analysis on tumors from eight patients demonstrated a trend of longer survival after ICI for those with elevated PD-L1 expression. NGS of samples from 15 patients identified EGFR amplification at initial diagnosis and at any time point to be associated with worse survival after ICI (HR 12.2, 95% CI 1.37-108, p = 0.025 and HR 3.92, 95% CI 1.03-14.9, p = 0.045, respectively). This significance was corroborated with previously tested EGFR amplification via in situ hybridization. CONCLUSION: ICI did not extend overall survival for recurrent GBM. However, molecular sequencing identified EGFR amplification as associated with worse survival. Prospective studies can validate if EGFR amplification is a biomarker of ICI resistance and determine if its use can stratify responders from non-responders.

Introduction Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating form of cancer with a poor prognosis despite available treatments. Managing recurrent GBM remains challenging and lacks guidelines. This study aims to provide practice patterns for managing recurrent GBMs in India.

Aim: A radio-pathomic machine learning (ML) model has been developed to estimate tumor cell density, cytoplasm density (Cyt) and extracellular fluid density (ECF) from multimodal MR images and autopsy pathology. In this multicenter study, we implemented this model to test its ability to predict survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) treated with chemotherapy.Methods: Pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted, FLAIR and ADC images were used to generate radio-pathomic maps for 51 patients with longitudinal pre- and post-treatment scans. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to test the influence of contrast-enhancing tumor volume, total cellularity, mean Cyt and mean ECF at baseline, immediately post-treatment and the pre- and post-treatment rate of change in volume and cellularity on overall survival (OS).Results: Smaller Cyt and larger ECF after treatment were significant predictors of OS, independent of tumor volume and other clinical prognostic factors (HR = 3.23 × 10-6, p

BackgroundAlterations in tumor growth rate (TGR) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) after treatment may be useful for identifying therapeutic activity. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of volumetric TGR alterations on overall survival (OS) in rGBM treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy (RT).MethodsSixty-one rGBM patients treated with chemotherapy with or without concomitant radiation therapy (RT) at 1st or 2nd recurrence were retrospectively examined. Pre- and post-treatment contrast enhancing volumes were computed. Patients were considered "responders" if they reached progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and showed a decrease in TGR after treatment and "non-responders" if they didn't reach PFS6 or if TGR increased.ResultsStratification by PFS6 and based on TGR resulted in significant differences in OS both for all patients and for patients without RT (P < 0.05). A decrease of TGR (P = 0.009), smaller baseline tumor volume (P = 0.02), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation (P = 0.048) and fewer number of recurrences (P = 0.048) were significantly associated with longer OS after controlling for age, sex and concomitant RT.ConclusionA decrease in TGR in patients with PFS6, along with smaller baseline tumor volume, were associated with a significantly longer OS in rGBM treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation. Importantly, all patients that exhibited PFS6 also showed a measurable decrease in TGR.

Purpose: After glioblastoma (GB) recurrence, prognosis is very cumbersome. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and neurocognitive functioning (NCF) have become important endpoints in clinical trials when evaluating novel treatments. We aimed to evaluate the HRQoL and NCF in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) treated with a combination of surgical intervention (reoperation or biopsy) and intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition. Methods: Patients who participated in the trial (N = 23), at a single-center university hospital were included. Data were collected using 3 patient-reported outcome measures (EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BN20, and HADS) and computerized NCF testing. In the responder group, baseline values were compared to results at a 6-month follow-up. Additionally, exploratory analyses compared baseline HRQoL and NCF between responders and non-responders. Results: There were five responders and 18 non-responders. When comparing the mean and individual baseline with follow-up results for the responders, we observed overall a stable to slight clinically relevant improvement of HRQoL in multiple subsets of the questionnaires while maintaining a stable NCF. One patient deteriorated on anxiety and depression symptoms from baseline to follow-up. Conclusions: In patients that responded to intracerebral immunotherapy in our institutional trial, HRQoL and NCF remained stable over time, suggesting that no detrimental effect on cognitive function or quality of life may be expected with this treatment approach. Furthermore, there seems to be an overall tendency for responders to score better on HRQoL and NCF than non-responders at baseline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating form of cancer with a poor prognosis despite available treatments. Managing recurrent GBM remains challenging and lacks guidelines. This study aims to provide practice patterns for managing recurrent GBMs in India. Methods A panel of experts was assembled to develop practice patterns using the Delphi technique. Their responses were analyzed anonymously to ensure impartiality and generate recommendations. The statements were intended to be nonbinding and focused on promoting best practices in the field, without legal or regulatory authority. Results A total of 23 experts participated in the study, providing their opinions on various aspects of managing recurrent GBM. Consensus was achieved on individualized and multidisciplinary management as the preferred approach. Surgery in combination with other treatments was found to impact survival in patients older than 65 years, with re-surgery and adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy being the preferred options. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain with spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging was favored. Molecular profiling was considered significant, with O 6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase methylation being most relevant. Surgery was recommended for recurrent GBMs, primarily based on Karnofsky's performance score (KPS). Surgical adjuncts such as neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI were considered valuable. Radiation therapy, specifically stereotactic radiosurgery, was recommended for selected cases, while opinions on re-chemotherapy were divided. Palliative care was deemed important. Conclusion This study presents practice patterns for managing recurrent GBM in India, providing standardized recommendations for practice. By implementing these, clinicians can make informed decisions, leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced variability in the management of recurrent GBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There are no generally accepted criteria for selecting patients with recurrent glioblastoma for surgery. This retrospective study in a Danish population-based cohort aimed to identify prognostic factors affecting postoperative survival after repeated surgery for recurrent glioblastoma and to test if the preoperative New Scale for Recurrent Glioblastoma Surgery (NSGS) developed by Park CK et al could assist in the selection of patients for repeat glioblastoma surgery. Methods: Clinical data from 66 patients with recurrent glioblastoma and repeated surgery were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier plots were produced to illustrate survival in each of the three NSGS prognostic groups, and Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify prognostic variables. Multivariable analysis was used to identify differences in survival in the three prognostic groups. Results: Six variables significantly affected postoperative survival: preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)

Abstract Purpose There are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma. Methods We retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m²orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria. Results The mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217–4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0–55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred. Conclusion In this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate.

Abstract Background Despite improvements in surgical as well as adjuvant therapies over the last decades, the prognosis for patients with glioblastoma remains poor. Five-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) induced porphyrins are already used for fluorescence-guided resection and as photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. New findings reveal their potential use as sensitizing agents in combination with ionizing radiation. Methods We initiated a phase I/II dose escalation study, treating patients with recurrence of glioblastoma with oral 5-ALA concurrent to radiotherapy (RT). This prospective single-center study based in the University Hospital Münster aims to recruit 30 patients over 18 years of age with histologically verified recurrence of supratentorial glioblastoma in good performance status (KPS ≥ 60). Following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, patients having undergone re-resection will receive a 36 Gy RT including radiodynamic therapy fractions (RDT). RDT constitutes of oral administration of 5-ALA before the irradiation session. Two cohorts will additionally receive two fractions of neoadjuvant treatment three and two days before surgery. To determine the maximum tolerated dose of repeated 5-ALA-administration, the number of RDT-fractions will increase, starting with one to a maximum of eight fractions, while closely monitoring for safety and toxicity. Follow-up will be performed at two and five months after treatment. Primary endpoint will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of repeated ALA-administration, secondary endpoints are event-free-, progression-free-, and overall-survival. Additionally, 5-ALA metabolites and radiobiological markers will be analysed throughout the course of therapy and tissue effects after neoadjuvant treatment will be determined in resected tissue. This protocol is in accordance with the SPIRIT guidelines for clinical trial protocols. Discussion This is the protocol of the ALA-RDT in GBM-study, the first-in-man evaluation of repeated administration of 5-ALA as a radiosensitizer for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Trial registration This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of Westphalia-Lippe and the University of Münster on 12.10.2022, the German federal institute for Drugs and medical devices on 13.10.2022 and the federal office for radiation protection on 29.08.2022. This trial was registered on the public European EudraCT database (EudraCT-No.: 2021-004631-92) and is registered under www.cliniclatrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05590689).

BackgroundDiffusion MRI estimates of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) have been shown to be useful in predicting treatment response in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), with ADC elevations indicating tumor cell death. We aimed to investigate whether the ADC values measured before and after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the changes in these ADC values could predict overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent IDH wild-type GBM.MethodsForty-four patients who met the following inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective study: (i) diagnosed with recurrent IDH wild-type GBM and treated with either pembrolizumab or nivolumab and (ii) availability of diffusion data on pre- and post-ICI MRI. Tumor volume and the median relative ADC (rADC) with respect to the normal-appearing white matter within the enhancing tumor were calculated.ResultsMedian OS among all patients was 8.1 months (range, 1.0-22.5 months). Log-rank test revealed that higher post-treatment rADC was associated with a significantly longer OS (median, 10.3 months for rADC ≥ 1.63 versus 6.1 months for rADC < 1.63; P = .02), whereas tumor volume, pretreatment rADC, and changes in rADC after treatment were not significantly associated with OS. Cox regression analysis revealed that post-treatment rADC significantly influenced OS (P = .02, univariate analysis), even after controlling for age and sex (P =.01, multivariate analysis), and additionally controlling for surgery after ICI treatment (P = .045, multivariate analysis).ConclusionsElevated post-treatment rADC may be an early imaging biomarker for OS benefits in GBM patients receiving ICI treatment.

Background: MRI treatment response assessment maps (TRAMs) were introduced to distinguish recurrent malignant glioma from therapy related changes. TRAMs are calculated with two contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences and reflect the "late" wash-out (or contrast clearance) and wash-in of gadolinium. Vital tumor cells are assumed to produce a wash-out because of their high turnover rate and the associated hypervascularization, whereas contrast medium slowly accumulates in scar tissue. To examine the real value of this method, we compared TRAMs with the pathology findings obtained after a second biopsy or surgery when recurrence was suspected. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated TRAMs in adult patients with histologically demonstrated glioblastoma, contrast-enhancing tissue and a pre-operative MRI between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. Only patients with a second biopsy or surgery were evaluated. Volumes of the residual tumor, contrast clearance and contrast accumulation before the second surgery were analyzed. Results: Among 339 patients with mGBM who underwent MRI, we identified 29 repeated surgeries/biopsies in 27 patients 59 ± 12 (mean ± standard deviation) years of age. Twenty-eight biopsies were from patients with recurrent glioblastoma histology, and only one was from a patient with radiation necrosis. We volumetrically evaluated the 29 pre-surgery TRAMs. In recurrent glioblastoma, the ratio of wash-out volume to tumor volume was 36 ± 17% (range 1–73%), and the ratio of the wash-out volume to the sum of wash-out and wash-in volumes was 48 ± 21% (range 22–92%). For the one biopsy with radiation necrosis, the ratios were 42% and 54%, respectively. Conclusions: Typical recurrent glioblastoma shows a > 20%ratio of the wash-out volume to the sum of wash-out and wash-in volumes. The one biopsy with radiation necrosis indicated that such necrosis can also produce high wash-out in individual cases. Nevertheless, the additional information provided by TRAMs increases the reliability of diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: There are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: We retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m²orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria. Results: The mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217–4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0–55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred. Conclusion: In this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite improvements in surgical as well as adjuvant therapies over the last decades, the prognosis for patients with glioblastoma remains poor. Five-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) induced porphyrins are already used for fluorescence-guided resection and as photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. New findings reveal their potential use as sensitizing agents in combination with ionizing radiation. Methods: We initiated a phase I/II dose escalation study, treating patients with recurrence of glioblastoma with oral 5-ALA concurrent to radiotherapy (RT). This prospective single-center study based in the University Hospital Münster aims to recruit 30 patients over 18 years of age with histologically verified recurrence of supratentorial glioblastoma in good performance status (KPS ≥ 60). Following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, patients having undergone re-resection will receive a 36 Gy RT including radiodynamic therapy fractions (RDT). RDT constitutes of oral administration of 5-ALA before the irradiation session. Two cohorts will additionally receive two fractions of neoadjuvant treatment three and two days before surgery. To determine the maximum tolerated dose of repeated 5-ALA-administration, the number of RDT-fractions will increase, starting with one to a maximum of eight fractions, while closely monitoring for safety and toxicity. Follow-up will be performed at two and five months after treatment. Primary endpoint will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of repeated ALA-administration, secondary endpoints are event-free-, progression-free-, and overall-survival. Additionally, 5-ALA metabolites and radiobiological markers will be analysed throughout the course of therapy and tissue effects after neoadjuvant treatment will be determined in resected tissue. This protocol is in accordance with the SPIRIT guidelines for clinical trial protocols. Discussion: This is the protocol of the ALA-RDT in GBM-study, the first-in-man evaluation of repeated administration of 5-ALA as a radiosensitizer for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Trial registration: This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of Westphalia-Lippe and the University of Münster on 12.10.2022, the German federal institute for Drugs and medical devices on 13.10.2022 and the federal office for radiation protection on 29.08.2022. This trial was registered on the public European EudraCT database (EudraCT-No.: 2021-004631-92) and is registered under www.cliniclatrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05590689). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Combination Adenovirus + Pembrolizumab to Trigger Immune Virus Effects (CAPTIVE) study is a phase II clinical trial testing the efficacy of a recombinant adenovirus DNX-2401 combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab. Here, we report the first patients in this study who underwent viral delivery through real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stereotaxis–guided SmartFlow convection delivery of DNX-2401. Patients who underwent real-time MRI-guided DNX-2401 delivery through the SmartFlow convection catheter were prospectively followed. Precise catheter placement was achieved in all patients treated, and no adverse events were noted. Average radial error from target was 0.9 mm. Average procedural time was 3 hours 16 minutes and was comparable to other convection-enhanced delivery techniques. In 2 patients, delivery of DNX-2401 was visualized as >1 cm maximal diameter of T1 hypointensity infusate on MRI obtained immediately after completion of viral infusion. These patients exhibited partial response based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology assessment. The remaining patient showed <1 cm maximal diameter of infusate on immediate postinfusion MRI and showed disease progression on subsequent MRI. Our pilot case series supports compatibility of the SmartFlow system with oncolytic adenovirus delivery and provides the basis for future validation studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The care of patients with both high-grade glioma and low-grade glioma necessitates an interdisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, neurologists and other practitioners. In this review, we aim to detail the considerations, approaches and advances in the neurosurgical care of gliomas. We describe the impact of extent-of-resection in high-grade and low-grade glioma, with particular focus on primary and recurrent glioblastoma. We address advances in surgical methods and adjunct technologies such as intraoperative imaging and fluorescence guided surgery that maximize extent-of-resection while minimizing the potential for iatrogenic neurological deficits. Finally, we review surgically-mediated therapies other than resection and discuss the role of neurosurgery in emerging paradigm-shifts in inter-disciplinary glioma management such as serial tissue sampling and "window of opportunity trials". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary, malignant brain tumor in adults and has a poor prognosis. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of newly diagnosed GBM is approximately 6 months. The recurrence rate approaches 100%, and the case-fatality ratio approaches one. Half the patients die within 8 months of recurrence, and 5-year survival is less than 10%. Advances in treatment options are urgently needed. We report on the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic vaccine (SITOIGANAP: Epitopoietic Research Corporation) administered to 21 patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM) under a Right-to-Try/Expanded Access program. SITOIGANAP is composed of both autologous and allogeneic tumor cells and lysates.MethodsTwenty-one patients with rGBM received SITOIGANAP on 28-day cycles in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), cyclophosphamide, bevacizumab, and an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody (either nivolumab or pembrolizumab).ResultsThe mPFS was 9.14 months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 19.63 months from protocol entry. Currently, 14 patients (67%) are at least 6 months past their first SITOIGANAP cycle; 10 patients (48%) have received at least six cycles and have a mOS of 30.64 months and 1-year survival of 90%. The enrollment and end-of-study CD3+/CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts strongly correlate with OS.ConclusionsThe addition of SITOIGANAP/GM-CSF/cyclophosphamide to bevacizumab and an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody resulted in a significant survival benefit compared to historic control values in rGBM with minimal toxicity compared to current therapy.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary tumor in the brain, with poor prognosis and limited effective therapies. Although Bevacizumab (BEV) has shown promise in extending progression-free survival (PFS) treating GBM, there is no evidence for its ability to prolong overall survival (OS). Given the uncertainty surrounding BEV treatment strategies, we aimed to provide an evidence map associated with BEV therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM). Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the period from January 1, 1970, to March 1, 2022, for studies reporting the prognoses of patients with rGBM receiving BEV. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). The secondary endpoints were PFS, steroid use reduction, and risk of adverse effects. A scoping review and an evidence map were conducted to explore the optimal BEV treatment (including combination regimen, dosage, and window of opportunity). Results Patients with rGBM could gain benefits in PFS, palliative, and cognitive advantages from BEV treatment, although the OS benefits could not be verified with high-quality evidence. Furthermore, BEV combined therapy (especially with lomustine and radiotherapy) showed higher efficacy than BEV monotherapy in the survival of patients with rGBM. Specific molecular alterations (IDH mutation status) and clinical features (large tumor burden and double-positive sign) could predict better responses to BEV administration. A low dosage of BEV showed equal efficacy to the recommended dose, but the optimal opportunity window for BEV administration remains unclear. Conclusions Although OS benefits from BEV-containing regimens could not be verified in this scoping review, the PFS benefits and side effects control supported BEV application in rGBM. Combining BEV with novel treatments like tumor-treating field (TTF) and administration at first recurrence may optimize the therapeutic efficacy. rGBM with a low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCL), large tumor burden, or IDH mutation is more likely to benefit from BEV treatment. High-quality studies are warranted to explore the combination modality and identify BEV-response subpopulations to maximize benefits.

Introduction and background: While recurrent glioblastoma patients are often treated with re-irradiation, there is limited data on the use of re-irradiation in the setting of bevacizumab (BEV), temozolomide (TMZ) re-challenge, or immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). We describe target delineation in patients with prior anti-angiogenic therapy, assess safety and efficacy of re-irradiation, and evaluate patterns of recurrence. Materials and methods: Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of glioblastoma treated at a single institution between 2013 and 2021 with re-irradiation were included. Tumor, treatment and clinical data were collected. Logistic and Cox regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: One hundred and seventeen recurrent glioblastoma patients were identified, receiving 129 courses of re-irradiation. In 66 % (85/129) of cases, patients had prior BEV. In the 80 patients (62 %) with available re-irradiation plans, 20 (25 %) had all T2/FLAIR abnormality included in the gross tumor volume (GTV). Median overall survival (OS) for the cohort was 7.3 months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months. Acute CTCAE grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 8 % of cases. Concurrent use of TMZ or ICI was not associated with improved OS nor PFS. On multivariable analysis, higher KPS was significantly associated with longer OS (p

The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the potential of the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting ligand, [68Ga]-PSMA–Glu–NH–CO–NH–Lys-2-naphthyl-L-Ala-cyclohexane-DOTA ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617) as a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging biomarker in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET scans on two separate days. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 tumour selectivity was assessed by comparing tumour volume delineation and by assessing the intra-patient correlation between tumour uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [18F]FET PET images. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 tumour specificity was evaluated by comparing its tumour-to-brain ratio (TBR) with [18F]FET TBR and its tumour volume with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast-enhancing (CE) tumour volume. Ten patients were recruited in this study. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617-avid tumour volume was larger than the [18F]FET tumour volume (p = 0.063). There was a positive intra-patient correlation (median Pearson r = 0.51; p < 0.0001) between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [18F]FET in the tumour volume. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 had significantly higher TBR (p = 0.002) than [18F]FET. The [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617-avid tumour volume was larger than the CE tumour volume (p = 0.0039). Overall, accumulation of [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-617 beyond [18F]FET-avid tumour regions suggests the presence of neoangiogenesis in tumour regions that are not overly metabolically active yet. Higher tumour specificity suggests that [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-617 could be a better imaging biomarker for recurrent tumour delineation and secondary treatment planning than [18F]FET and CE MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor, approved as a preferred regimen for recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). Although its effects on prolonging survival could seem modest, it is still unclear whether a subset of patients, potentially identifiable by imaging biomarkers, might experience a more substantial positive effect. Our aim was to evaluate the potential value of magnetic resonance imaging-derived parameters as non-invasive biomarkers to predict response to regorafenib in patients with rGB. Methods: 20 patients with rGB underwent conventional and advanced MRI at diagnosis (before surgery), at recurrence and at first follow-up (3 months) during regorafenib. Maximum relative cerebral blood volume (rCBVmax) value, intra-tumoral susceptibility signals (ITSS), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and contrast-enhancing tumor volumes were tested for correlation with response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Response at first follow-up was assessed according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Results: 8/20 patients showed stable disease at first follow-up. rCBVmax values of the primary glioblastoma (before surgery) significantly correlated to treatment response; specifically, patients with stable disease displayed higher rCBVmax compared to progressive disease (p = 0.04, 2-group t test). Moreover, patients with stable disease showed longer PFS (p = 0.02, 2-group t test) and OS (p = 0.04, 2-group t test). ITSS, ADC values, and contrast-enhancing tumor volumes showed no correlation with treatment response, PFS nor OS. Conclusion: Our results suggest that rCBVmax of the glioblastoma at diagnosis could serve as a non-invasive biomarker of treatment response to regorafenib in patients with rGB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite tremendous efforts to exploit effective therapeutic strategies, most glioblastoma (GBM) inevitably relapse and become resistant to therapies, including radiotherapy and immunotherapy. The tumor microenvironment (TME) of recurrent GBM (rGBM) is highly immunosuppressive, dominated by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). TAMs consist of tissue-resident microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs), which are essential for favoring tumor growth, invasion, angiogenesis, immune suppression, and therapeutic resistance; however, restricted by the absence of potent methods, the heterogeneity and plasticity of TAMs in rGBM remain incompletely investigated. Recent application of single-cell technologies, such as single-cell RNA-sequencing has enabled us to decipher the unforeseen diversity and dynamics of TAMs and to identify new subsets of TAMs which regulate antitumor immunity. Here, we first review hallmarks of the TME, progress and challenges of immunotherapy, and the biology of TAMs in the context of rGBM, including their origins, categories, and functions. Next, from a singlecell perspective, we highlight recent findings regarding the distinctions between tissue-resident microglia and MDMs, the identification and characterization of specific TAM subsets, and the dynamic alterations of TAMs during tumor progression and treatment. Last, we briefly discuss the potential of TAMtargeted strategies for combination immunotherapy in rGBM. We anticipate the comprehensive understanding of the diversity and dynamics of TAMs in rGBM will shed light on further improvement of immunotherapeutic efficacy in rGBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the deadliest primary central nervous system (CNS) cancer in adults despite aggressive treatment. Once progressed, the prognosis is very poor and the effective traditional medicine treatment options are limited, so the management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains challenging. Immunotherapy has revolutionized the prospects for many cancer types, but the intrinsic complexity of treating intracerebral tumors and the highly immunosuppressive environment have hampered the development of effective immunotherapies. The current focus of research in rGBM is on combination therapy, identifying predictive markers, and establishing synergy between immunotherapy and standard treatment. In this review, we discuss the current state of immunotherapy for rGBM, its future directions, and the challenges associated with each strategy. Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is a highly aggressive form of brain cancer that poses a significant challenge for treatment in neuro-oncology, and the survival status of patients after relapse usually means rapid deterioration, thus becoming the leading cause of death among patients. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma by stimulating the body's immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells, which could be used in combination with other treatments such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy to improve outcomes for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. This therapy combines several key methods such as the use of monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy, checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viral therapy cancer vaccines, and combination strategies. In this review, we mainly document the latest immunotherapies for the treatment of glioblastoma and especially focus on rGBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor associated with a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 14 months. Despite initial treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, recurrence is the usual situation. Controversy remains over the best treatment strategy for recurrent disease, and there is no standard of treatment in this situation. Different forms of treatment have been addressed, including a surgical procedure or radiotherapy, systemic treatment with chemotherapy or targeted drugs, and different immunotherapy strategies. Knowledge of the data from these studies allows for improved decision-making in this clinical situation. Glioblastoma is a disease with a poor prognosis. Multiple efforts have been made to improve the long-term outcome, but the 5-year survival rate is still 5–10%. Recurrence of the disease is the usual way of progression. In this situation, there is no standard treatment. Different treatment options can be considered. Among them would be reoperation or reirradiation. There are different studies that have assessed the impact on survival and the selection of patients who may benefit most from these strategies. Chemotherapy treatments have also been considered in several studies, mainly with alkylating agents, with data mostly from phase II studies. On the other hand, multiple studies have been carried out with target-directed treatments. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody with anti-angiogenic activity, has demonstrated activity in several studies, and the FDA has approved it for this indication. Several other TKI drugs have been evaluated in this setting, but no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Immunotherapy treatments have been shown to be effective in other types of tumors, and several studies have evaluated their efficacy in this disease, both immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, and vaccines. This paper reviews data from different studies that have evaluated the efficacy of different forms of relapsed glioblastoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite aggressive management consisting of surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and systemic therapy given alone or in combination, a significant proportion of patients with brain tumors will experience tumor recurrence. For these patients, no standard of care exists and management of either primary or metastatic recurrent tumors remains challenging. Advances in imaging and RT technology have enabled more precise tumor localization and dose delivery, leading to a reduction in the volume of health brain tissue exposed to high radiation doses. Radiation techniques have evolved from three-dimensional (3-D) conformal RT to the development of sophisticated techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic techniques, either stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Several studies have suggested that a second course of RT is a feasible treatment option in patients with a recurrent tumor; however, survival benefit and treatment related toxicity of reirradiation, given alone or in combination with other focal or systemic therapies, remain a controversial issue. We provide a critical overview of the current clinical status and technical challenges of reirradiation in patients with both recurrent primary brain tumors, such as gliomas, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and meningiomas, and brain metastases. Relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate radiation technique and patient selection, the optimal radiation dose and fractionation, tolerance of the brain to a second course of RT, and the risk of adverse radiation effects have been critically discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant CNS tumor with a highest incidence rate, and most patients would undergo a recurrence. Recurrent GBM (rGBM) shows an increasing resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, leading to a significantly poorer prognosis and the urgent need for novel treatments. Immunotherapy, a rapidly developing anti-tumor therapy in recent years, has shown its potential value in rGBM. Recent studies on PD-1 immunotherapy and CAR-T therapy have shown some efficacy, but the outcome was not as expected. Tumor vaccination is the oldest approach of immunotherapies, which has returned to the research focus because of the failure of other strategies and subversive understanding of CNS. The isolation effect of blood brain barrier and the immunosuppressive cell infiltration could lead to resistance existing in all phases of the anti-tumor immune response, where novel tumor vaccines have been designed to overcome these problems through new tumor antigenic targets and regulatory of the systematic immune response. In this review, the immunological characteristics of CNS and GBM would be discussed and summarized, as well as the mechanism of each novel tumor vaccine for rGBM. And through the review of completed early-phase studies and ongoing large-scale phase III clinical trials, evaluation could be conducted for potential immune response, biosecurity and initial clinical outcome, which further draw a panorama of this vital research field and provide some deep thoughts for the prospective tendency of vaccination strategy. Video Abstract

Simple Summary: There are few established treatment options for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Immunotherapy, which potentiates the immune system to counter tumor growth, offers new hope for treating GBM that has relapsed after conventional therapies. The aim of this literature review is to summarize recent clinical studies of immunotherapy for rGBM, including that of immune checkpoint blockade, oncolytic virotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, cancer vaccine and antibody-conjugated toxin. The literature search was concluded in February 2023. This review of immunotherapies provides a comprehensive overview of treatment advances, limitations in each strategy, ongoing opportunities, and preliminary correlates to survival, in order to support clinical decision-making and guide future research endeavors. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite standard therapies, including resection and chemoradiation, recurrence is virtually inevitable. Current treatment for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is rapidly evolving, and emerging therapies aimed at targeting primary GBM are often first tested in rGBM to demonstrate safety and feasibility, which, in recent years, has primarily been in the form of immunotherapy. The purpose of this review is to highlight progress in clinical trials of immunotherapy for rGBM, including immune checkpoint blockade, oncolytic virotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, cancer vaccine and immunotoxins. Three independent reviewers covered literature, published between the years 2000 and 2022, in various online databases. In general, the efficacy of immunotherapy in rGBM remains uncertain, and is limited to subsets/small cohorts of patients, despite demonstrating feasibility in early-stage clinical trials. However, considerable progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms that may preclude rGBM patients from responding to immunotherapy, as well as in developing new approaches/combination strategies that may inspire optimism for the utility of immunotherapy in this devastating disease. Continued trials are necessary to further assess the best therapeutic avenues and ascertain which treatments might benefit each patient individually. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary tumor in the brain, with poor prognosis and limited effective therapies. Although Bevacizumab (BEV) has shown promise in extending progression-free survival (PFS) treating GBM, there is no evidence for its ability to prolong overall survival (OS). Given the uncertainty surrounding BEV treatment strategies, we aimed to provide an evidence map associated with BEV therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the period from January 1, 1970, to March 1, 2022, for studies reporting the prognoses of patients with rGBM receiving BEV. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). The secondary endpoints were PFS, steroid use reduction, and risk of adverse effects. A scoping review and an evidence map were conducted to explore the optimal BEV treatment (including combination regimen, dosage, and window of opportunity). Results: Patients with rGBM could gain benefits in PFS, palliative, and cognitive advantages from BEV treatment, although the OS benefits could not be verified with high-quality evidence. Furthermore, BEV combined therapy (especially with lomustine and radiotherapy) showed higher efficacy than BEV monotherapy in the survival of patients with rGBM. Specific molecular alterations (IDH mutation status) and clinical features (large tumor burden and double-positive sign) could predict better responses to BEV administration. A low dosage of BEV showed equal efficacy to the recommended dose, but the optimal opportunity window for BEV administration remains unclear. Conclusions: Although OS benefits from BEV-containing regimens could not be verified in this scoping review, the PFS benefits and side effects control supported BEV application in rGBM. Combining BEV with novel treatments like tumor-treating field (TTF) and administration at first recurrence may optimize the therapeutic efficacy. rGBM with a low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCL), large tumor burden, or IDH mutation is more likely to benefit from BEV treatment. High-quality studies are warranted to explore the combination modality and identify BEV-response subpopulations to maximize benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glioblastomas are highly heterogeneous brain tumors. Despite the availability of standard treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), i.e., Stupp protocol, which involves surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, glioblastoma remains refractory to treatment and recurrence is inevitable. Moreover, the biology of recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. Increasing evidence has shown that intratumoral heterogeneity and the tumor microenvironment contribute to therapeutic resistance. However, the interaction between intracellular heterogeneity and drug resistance in recurrent GBMs remains controversial. The aim of this study was to map the transcriptome landscape of cancer cells and the tumor heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment in recurrent and drug‐resistant GBMs at a single‐cell resolution and further explore the mechanism of drug resistance of GBMs. We analyzed six tumor tissue samples from three patients with primary GBM and three patients with recurrent GBM in which recurrence and drug resistance developed after treatment with the standard Stupp protocol using single‐cell RNA sequencing. Using unbiased clustering, nine major cell clusters were identified. Upregulation of the expression of stemness‐related and cell‐cycle‐related genes was observed in recurrent GBM cells. Compared with the initial GBM tissues, recurrent GBM tissues showed a decreased proportion of microglia, consistent with previous reports. Finally, vascular endothelial growth factor A expression and the blood–brain barrier permeability were high, and the O6‐methylguanine DNA methyltransferase‐related signaling pathway was activated in recurrent GBM. Our results delineate the single‐cell map of recurrent glioblastoma, tumor heterogeneity, tumor microenvironment, and drug‐resistance mechanisms, providing new insights into treatment strategies for recurrent glioblastomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundDiffusion magnetic resonance (MR) characteristics are a predictive imaging biomarker for survival benefit in recurrent glioblastoma treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy; however, its use in large volume recurrence has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo determine if diffusion MR characteristics can predict survival outcomes in patients with large volume recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab or repeat resection.MethodsA total of 32 patients with large volume (>20 cc or > 3.4 cm diameter) recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab and 35 patients treated with repeat surgery were included. Pretreatment tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis were used to phenotype patients as having high (>1.24 μm2/ms) or low (

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) cellularity correlates with whole brain spectroscopic MRI (sMRI) generated relative choline to N-Acetyl-Aspartate ratio (rChoNAA) mapping. In recurrent GBM (rGBM), tumor volume (TV) delineation is challenging and rChoNAA maps may assist with re-RT targeting. Methods Fourteen rGBM patients underwent sMRI in a prospective study. Whole brain sMRI was performed to generate rChoNAA maps. TVs were delineated by the union of rChoNAA ratio over 2 (rChoNAA > 2) on sMRI and T1PC. rChoNAA > 2 volumes were compared with multiparametric MRI sequences including T1PC, T2/FLAIR, diffusion-restriction on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and perfusion relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). Results rChoNAA > 2 (mean 27.6 cc, range 6.6–79.1 cc) was different from other imaging modalities (P ≤ 0.05). Mean T1PC volumes were 10.7 cc (range 1.2–31.4 cc). The mean non-overlapping volume of rChoNAA > 2 and T1PC was 29.2 cm3. rChoNAA > 2 was 287% larger (range 23% smaller–873% larger) than T1PC. T2/FLAIR volumes (mean 111.7 cc, range 19.0–232.7 cc) were much larger than other modalities. rCBV volumes (mean 6.2 cc, range 0.2–19.1 cc) and ADC volumes were tiny (mean 0.8 cc, range 0–3.7 cc). Eight in-field failures were observed. Three patients failed outside T1PC but within rChoNAA > 2. No grade 3 toxicities attributable to re-RT were observed. Median progression-free and overall survival for re-RT patients were 6.5 and 7.1 months, respectively. Conclusions Treatment of rGBM may be optimized by sMRI, and failure patterns suggest benefit for dose-escalation within sMRI-delineated volumes. Dose-escalation and radiologic-pathologic studies are underway to confirm the utility of sMRI in rGBM.

Abstract Background Efficient exploration of knowledge for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is critical for both clinicians and researchers. However, due to the large number of clinical trials and published articles, searching for this knowledge is very labor-intensive. In the current study, using natural language processing (NLP), we analyzed medical research corpora related to recurrent glioblastoma to find potential targets and treatments. Methods We fine-tuned the ‘SAPBERT’, which was pretrained on biomedical ontologies, to perform question/answering (QA) and name entity recognition (NER) tasks for medical corpora. The model was fine-tuned with the SQUAD2 dataset and multiple NER datasets designed for QA task and NER task, respectively. Corpora were collected by searching the terms “recurrent glioblastoma” and “drug target”, published from 2000 to 2020 in the Web of science (N = 288 articles). Also, clinical trial corpora were collected from ‘clinicaltrial.gov’ using the searching term of ‘recurrent glioblastoma” (N = 587 studies). Results For the QA task, the model showed an F1 score of 0.79. For the NER task, the model showed F1 scores of 0.90 and 0.76 for drug and gene name recognition, respectively. When asked what the molecular targets were promising for recurrent glioblastoma, the model answered that RTK inhibitors or LPA-1 antagonists were promising. From collected clinical trials, the model summarized them in the order of bevacizumab, temozolomide, lomustine, and nivolumab. Based on published articles, the model found the many drug-gene pairs with the NER task, and we presented them with a circus plot and related summarization ( https://github.com/bigwiz83/NLP_rGBM ). Conclusion Using NLP deep learning models, we could explore potential targets and treatments based on medical research and clinical trial corpora. The knowledge found by the models may be used for treating recurrent glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant CNS tumor with a highest incidence rate, and most patients would undergo a recurrence. Recurrent GBM (rGBM) shows an increasing resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, leading to a significantly poorer prognosis and the urgent need for novel treatments. Immunotherapy, a rapidly developing anti-tumor therapy in recent years, has shown its potential value in rGBM. Recent studies on PD-1 immunotherapy and CAR-T therapy have shown some efficacy, but the outcome was not as expected. Tumor vaccination is the oldest approach of immunotherapies, which has returned to the research focus because of the failure of other strategies and subversive understanding of CNS. The isolation effect of blood brain barrier and the immunosuppressive cell infiltration could lead to resistance existing in all phases of the anti-tumor immune response, where novel tumor vaccines have been designed to overcome these problems through new tumor antigenic targets and regulatory of the systematic immune response. In this review, the immunological characteristics of CNS and GBM would be discussed and summarized, as well as the mechanism of each novel tumor vaccine for rGBM. And through the review of completed early-phase studies and ongoing large-scale phase III clinical trials, evaluation could be conducted for potential immune response, biosecurity and initial clinical outcome, which further draw a panorama of this vital research field and provide some deep thoughts for the prospective tendency of vaccination strategy. 4_xTL8icat7DcLuKENZ92J Video Abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is poor, and there is currently no effective treatment strategy. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is a new method for cancer treatment that uses a combination of low-frequency ultrasound and sonosensitisers to produce antitumor effects, which have shown good therapeutic effects in preclinical studies. Therefore, we initiated an open, prospective pilot study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of SDT for the treatment of rGBM. Methods: Nine patients with rGBM were enrolled who had received multiple treatments, but the nidus continued to progress without additional standard treatments. After MRI localisation, porphyrin drugs were injected, and intermittent low-frequency ultrasound therapy was performed for five days. Results: None of the nine patients in this clinical trial showed any clinical, neurological, haematological, or skin-targeted adverse effects associated with SDT. After the completion of the trial, one patient maintained stable disease, and eight patients experienced disease progression. Among the eight with progressive disease, the median progression-free survival time was 84 days. Four patients died, and the median overall survival duration after recurrence was 202.5 days. Conclusion: The number of patients in this study was small; therefore, a long-term survival benefit was not demonstrated. However, this study suggests that SDT has potential as a treatment for rGBM and warrants further exploration. Trial information: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn/): ChiCTR2200065992. November 2, 2022, retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and aggressive adult brain tumor. Despite multi-modal therapies, GBM recurs, and patients have poor survival (~14 months). Resistance to therapy may originate from a subpopulation of tumor cells identified as glioma-stem cells (GSC), and new treatments are urgently needed to target these. The biology underpinning GBM recurrence was investigated using whole transcriptome profiling of patient-matched initial and recurrent GBM (recGBM). Differential expression analysis identified 147 significant probes. In total, 24 genes were validated using expression data from four public cohorts and the literature. Functional analyses revealed that transcriptional changes to recGBM were dominated by angiogenesis and immune-related processes. The role of MHC class II proteins in antigen presentation and the differentiation, proliferation, and infiltration of immune cells was enriched. These results suggest recGBM would benefit from immunotherapies. The altered gene signature was further analyzed in a connectivity mapping analysis with QUADrATiC software to identify FDA-approved repurposing drugs. Top-ranking target compounds that may be effective against GSC and GBM recurrence were rosiglitazone, nizatidine, pantoprazole, and tolmetin. Our translational bioinformatics pipeline provides an approach to identify target compounds for repurposing that may add clinical benefit in addition to standard therapies against resistant cancers such as GBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and diffusely infiltrative primary brain tumor. Recurrence is almost universal even after all primary standard treatments. This article aims to review the literature and update the standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods A systematic search was performed with the phrase "recurrent glioblastoma and management" as a search term in PubMed central, Medline, and Embase databases to identify all the articles published on the subject till December 2020. The review included peer-reviewed original articles, clinical trials, review articles, and keywords in title and abstract. Results Out of 513 articles searched, 73 were included in this review after screening for eligibility. On analyzing the data, most of the studies report a median overall survival (OS) of 5.9 to 11.4 months after re-surgery and 4.7 to 7.6 months without re-surgery. Re-irradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) result in a median OS of 10.2 months (range: 7.0–12 months) and 9.8 months (ranged: 7.5–11.0 months), respectively. Radiation necrosis was found in 16.6% (range: 0–24.4%) after SRS. Chemotherapeutic agents like nitrosourea (carmustine), bevacizumab, and temozolomide (TMZ) rechallenge result in a median OS in the range of 5.1 to 7.5, 6.5 to 9.2, and 5.1–13.0 months and six months progression free survival (PFS-6) in the range of 13 to 17.5%, 25 to 42.6%, and 23 to 58.3%, respectively. Use of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors results in a median OS in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 months and PFS-6 in 13%. Conclusion Although recurrent glioblastoma remains a fatal disease with universal mortality, the literature suggests that a subset of patients may benefit from maximal treatment efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Glioblastomas are the most common and highly malignant primary brain tumors in adults with a median survival of 15 months even with appropriate treatment. Extracranial metastases are extremely rare due to the poor prognosis not allowing sufficient time to spread. We report an extremely rare case of extracranial metastasis of supra-tentorial glioblastoma involving the skin, subcutaneous and muscular layers, periauricular region and parotid gland, and review the literature. A total of 13 glioblastoma parotid gland metastases cases have been hitherto described. Main body of the abstract A 42-year-old man underwent surgery for right temporal glioblastoma and received 60 Gy/30 fractions radiotherapy together with temozolomide at 75 mg/m2. Seven months later, the tumor relapsed and the patient underwent a second surgery while chemotherapy continued. Fifteen months later, he complained of swelling in the right neck region. Fine needle aspiration and tru-cut biopsy revealed a high-grade malignant tumor infiltration within the parotid gland. Despite salvage chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy, in his follow-up after 6 months neck swelling increased. The patient declined any treatment modality and continues his life 39 months after the primary diagnosis of intracranial glioblastoma. Short conclusion Due to the recurrence rate of intracranial glioblastoma and its malignant nature; close imaging follow-up is highly crucial. The increase in reported cases of its extracranial metastases is generally due to the modern diagnostic tools and prolonged survival attributed to the improvement in treatment modalities where now radical surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is standard protocol. Patients with glioblastomas presenting with swelling in the cervical region should be investigated to rule out parotid gland metastasis.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant tumor with a short survival and poor prognosis and a lack of clinically validated biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis. Methods: We collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples and normal CSF sample from recurrent GBM patients and paired tissue samples. Methylation profiles of CSF circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and transcriptional profiles of tumor tissues were analyzed. The China Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) database and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) was used for data analysis. Results: Lasso analysis and multiplex Cox analysis were performed using intersecting genes of differentially methylated regions and differentially expressed genes. 8 hub genes were screened to construct diagnostic and prognostic models. Based on these 8 hub genes, the diagnostic (AUC = 0.944) and prognostic (3-years, AUC = 0.876) models were accurate. Conclusions: In this study, 8 hub genes were identified for the diagnosis and prognosis of recurrent GBM, providing new biomarkers for the clinical study of recurrent GBM.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) cellularity correlates with whole brain spectroscopic MRI (sMRI) generated relative choline to N-Acetyl-Aspartate ratio (rChoNAA) mapping. In recurrent GBM (rGBM), tumor volume (TV) delineation is challenging and rChoNAA maps may assist with re-RT targeting. Methods: Fourteen rGBM patients underwent sMRI in a prospective study. Whole brain sMRI was performed to generate rChoNAA maps. TVs were delineated by the union of rChoNAA ratio over 2 (rChoNAA > 2) on sMRI and T1PC. rChoNAA > 2 volumes were compared with multiparametric MRI sequences including T1PC, T2/FLAIR, diffusion-restriction on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and perfusion relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). Results: rChoNAA > 2 (mean 27.6 cc, range 6.6–79.1 cc) was different from other imaging modalities (P ≤ 0.05). Mean T1PC volumes were 10.7 cc (range 1.2–31.4 cc). The mean non-overlapping volume of rChoNAA > 2 and T1PC was 29.2 cm3. rChoNAA > 2 was 287% larger (range 23% smaller–873% larger) than T1PC. T2/FLAIR volumes (mean 111.7 cc, range 19.0–232.7 cc) were much larger than other modalities. rCBV volumes (mean 6.2 cc, range 0.2–19.1 cc) and ADC volumes were tiny (mean 0.8 cc, range 0–3.7 cc). Eight in-field failures were observed. Three patients failed outside T1PC but within rChoNAA > 2. No grade 3 toxicities attributable to re-RT were observed. Median progression-free and overall survival for re-RT patients were 6.5 and 7.1 months, respectively. Conclusions: Treatment of rGBM may be optimized by sMRI, and failure patterns suggest benefit for dose-escalation within sMRI-delineated volumes. Dose-escalation and radiologic-pathologic studies are underway to confirm the utility of sMRI in rGBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: We compared gene expression in matched primary and recurrent glioblastoma samples, with a focus on those harbouring extra copies of the gene called EGFR (amplified samples). Our results show that in the setting of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, EGFR-amplified compared to EGFR non-amplified tumours display altered gene expression in the EGFR pathway, but this distinction is lost in the setting of recurrent disease. We validated this finding in an independent dataset. EGFR pathway overexpression may be a common mechanism underlying glioblastoma recurrence. Background: Glioblastoma mortality is driven by tumour progression or recurrence despite administering a therapeutic arsenal consisting of surgical resection, radiation, and alkylating chemotherapy. The genetic changes underlying tumour progression and chemotherapy resistance are poorly understood. Methods: In this study, we sought to define the relationship between EGFR amplification status, EGFR mRNA expression, and EGFR pathway activity. We compared RNA-sequencing data from matched primary and recurrent tumour samples (n = 40 patients, 20 with EGFR amplification). Results: In the setting of glioblastoma recurrence, the EGFR pathway was overexpressed regardless of EGFR-amplification status, suggesting a common genomic endpoint in recurrent glioblastoma, although EGFR amplification did associate with higher EGFR mRNA expression. Three of forty patients in the study cohort had EGFR-amplified tumours and received targeted EGFR therapy. Their molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes did not significantly differ from patients who received conventional chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that while the EGFR amplification may confer a unique molecular profile in primary glioblastoma, pathway analysis reveals upregulation of the EGFR pathway in recurrence, regardless of amplification status. As such, the EGFR pathway may be a key mediator of glioblastoma progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]