1. Outcomes of patients with advanced epithelial growth factor receptor mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib who would not have met the eligibility criteria for the FLAURA clinical trial.
- Author
-
Connor Wells J, Mullin MM, Ho C, Melosky B, Laskin J, Wang Y, and Sun S
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Protein Kinase Inhibitors adverse effects, ErbB Receptors genetics, Aniline Compounds therapeutic use, Aniline Compounds adverse effects, Receptors, Growth Factor therapeutic use, Mutation genetics, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms genetics, Lung Neoplasms chemically induced, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung genetics, Acrylamides, Indoles, Pyrimidines
- Abstract
Objectives: Osimertinib is largely used as first-line therapy for metastatic epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung cancers based on the FLAURA clinical trial. Real-world patient outcomes often differ from clinical trial outcomes. This study evaluated the efficacy of first-line osimertinib in patients treated in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Furthermore, we compared the outcomes of patients who would and would not have been eligible for the original FLAURA trial., Methods: Consecutive patients receiving first-line osimertinib for metastatic EGFR exon19 or L858R lung cancer were identified using the BC Cancer Pharmacy Database. Patient eligibility for the FLAURA clinical trial were retrospectively reviewed based on the following criteria: ECOG ≥ 2, symptomatic brain metastases or on steroids, hemoglobin < 90 g/L, platelets < 100x10
9 /L, or a creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min. mOS was assessed for the entire population and compared between patients who would have been eligible and ineligible for FLAURA., Results: From January 2020 to October 2021, 311 patients received first-line osimertinib; 44 % (137/311) were deemed FLAURA ineligible, predominantly due to low ECOG (n = 120). After a median follow-up of 26.5 months, the mOS for the entire cohort was 27.4 months (95 %CI 23.8-30.1). The mOS for ineligible patients was 18 months shorter than eligible patients (15.8 vs 34.2, p < 0.001). Ineligible patients had higher rates of de novo stage IV disease, higher rates of stage IVB disease, and more sites of disease than eligible patients., Conclusion: In this real-world population, nearly half of patients would have been ineligible for FLAURA. The mOS was one year shorter than reported in FLAURA. However, patients who would have been eligible for the FLAURA clinical trial had similar OS to patients enrolled in FLAURA. Trial ineligible patients had a higher burden of disease at baseline which may have led to inferior outcomes. Further research is needed to improve outcomes in these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest JC Wells, M Mullin, and S Sun have no COIs to report. C Ho has received: Grants/Research funding - Astra Zeneca, Roche. Honoraria - Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, CADTH, Eisai, Jazz, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. B Melosky has received speaker honoraria or attended advisory boards for Astra Zeneca, BMS, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, Sanofi, EMD Serono, and Janssen J Laskin has received honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Takeda and Lilly; she has also received research funding to her institution from Roche., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF