Search

Purpose: HERALD/EPOC1806 was conducted as a multicenter phase II trial assessing trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2 )-amplified progressive stage solid tumors detected by cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing., Patients and Methods: Patients exhibited advanced solid tumors with HER2 amplification that was identified via next-generation sequencing of cfDNA testing, without the requirement for immunohistochemical HER2 testing. The studied group was administered T-DXd at 5.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks until onset of disease progression or intolerable toxicity., Results: Overall, 4,734 patients underwent cfDNA testing from December 2019 to January 2022, and 252 demonstrated HER2 amplification. Finally, the study included 62 patients with 16 cancer types with a median baseline plasma HER2 copy number (CN) of 8.55 (range, 2.4-73.9). Confirmed overall response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment was 56.5% (95% CI, 43.3 to 69.0), thus showing a value beyond the 5% threshold. Responses were evaluated for 13 cancer types, including KRAS -mutant colorectal (1/3), PIK3CA -mutant endometrial (5/6), and tissue HER2-negative gastric (1/2) cancers. Plasma HER2 CN above versus below the baseline median value did not differ for impact response; however, clearance of HER2 amplification in cfDNA on cycle 2 day 1 had higher response values compared with persistence. Median progression-free survival and response duration were 7.0 (95% CI, 4.9 to 9.7) and 8.8 (95% CI, 5.8 to 11.2) months, respectively, with the majority of complications being mild to moderate. Interstitial lung diseases were identified in 16 (26%) patients, including 14 patients with grade 1 disease, one patient with grade 2 disease, and one patient with grade 3 disease., Conclusion: T-DXd treatment demonstrated high ORR with durable response in patients with advanced HER2 -amplified solid tumors determined with cfDNA testing.

Long-term survival varies among hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer patients and is seriously impaired by metastasis. Chromosomal instability (CIN) was one of the key drivers of breast cancer metastasis. Here we evaluate CIN and 10-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) in HR+/HER2-- breast cancer. In this large-scale, multiple-site, retrospective study, 354 HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients were recruited. Of these, 204 patients were used for internal training, 70 for external validation, and 80 for cross-validation. All medical records were carefully reviewed to obtain the disease recurrence information. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were collected, followed by low-pass whole-genome sequencing with a median genome coverage of 1.86X using minimal 1 ng DNA input. CIN was then assessed using a customized bioinformatics workflow. Three or more instances of CIN per sample was defined as high CIN and the frequency was 42.2% (86/204) in the internal cohort. High CIN correlated significantly with increased lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, progesterone receptor negative status, HER2 low, worse pathological type, and performed as an independent prognostic factor for HR+/- breast cancer. Patients with high CIN had shorter iDFS and OS than those with low CIN [10-year iDFS 11.1% versus 82.2%, hazard ratio (HR) = 11.12, p < 0.01; 10-year OS 45.7% versus 94.3%, HR = 14.17, p < 0.01]. These findings were validated in two external cohorts with 70 breast cancer patients. Moreover, high CIN could predict the prognosis more accurately than Adjuvant! Online score (10-year iDFS 11.1% versus 48.6%, HR = 2.71, p < 0.01). Cross-validation analysis found that high consistency (83.8%) was observed between CIN and MammaPrint score, while only 45% between CIN and Adjuvant! Online score. In conclusion, high CIN is an independent prognostic indicator for HR+/HER2- breast cancer with shorter iDFS and OS and holds promise for predicting recurrence and metastasis., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Resistance to endocrine therapies in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is challenging. We aimed to assess the next-generation oral selective oestrogen receptor degrader (SERD) and complete oestrogen receptor antagonist, camizestrant, versus the first-approved SERD, fulvestrant, in post-menopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer., Methods: SERENA-2 is an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial that is being conducted at 74 study centres across Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and North America. Female patients aged 18 years or older who were post-menopausal with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastastic or locoregional oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group or WHO performance status of 0 or 1, and disease recurrence or progression on at least one line of endocrine therapy, and no more than one previous endocrine therapy in the advanced setting. Patients were initially randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive oral camizestrant once daily at 75 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg (until the 300 mg group was closed), or fulvestrant intramuscularly at 500 mg (per label). Randomisation was managed through an interactive web-based system and stratified by previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors and presence of liver and/or lung metastases. The primary objective was to determine clinical efficacy of camizestrant versus fulvestrant at each dose level using the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival, per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1), assessed by intention to treat in all randomly assigned patients (full analysis set). No formal statistical comparison for the efficacy analysis of the camizestrant 300 mg dose versus fulvestrant was to be performed. Safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04214288, and is ongoing., Findings: Between May 11, 2020, and Aug 10, 2021, 240 patients were randomly assigned to receive camizestrant 75 mg (n=74), 150 mg (n=73), 300 mg (n=20), or fulvestrant (n=73), and were included in the full analysis set. All patients received at least one dose of study drug. Median follow-up was 16·6 months (IQR 12·9-19·4) for the camizestrant 75 mg group, 16·3 months (12·9-18·3) for the camizestrant 150 mg group, and 14·7 months (12·7-20·1) for the fulvestrant 500 mg group. Median progression-free survival was 7·2 months (90% CI 3·7-10·9) with camizestrant 75 mg, 7·7 months (5·5-12·9) with camizestrant 150 mg, and 3·7 months (2·0-6·0) with fulvestrant. The hazard ratio for camizestrant 75 mg versus fulvestrant was 0·59 (90% CI 0·42-0·82; p=0·017), and the hazard ratio for camizestrant 150 mg versus fulvestrant was 0·64 (0·46-0·89; p=0·0090). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 39 (53%) of 74 patients in the camizestrant 75 mg group, 49 (67%) of 73 patients in the camizestrant 150 mg group, 14 (70%) of 20 patients in the camizestrant 300 mg group, and 13 (18%) of 73 patients in the fulvestrant group. No single grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in more than two (3%) patients in any group. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in six (8%) patients in the camizestrant 75 mg group, seven (10%) patients in the camizestrant 150 mg group, two (10%) patients in the camizestrant 300 mg group, and four (5%) patients in the fulvestrant group. No treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: Camizestrant at 75 and 150 mg showed a significant benefit in progression-free survival versus fulvestrant. These results support further development of camizestrant for the treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer., Funding: AstraZeneca., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MO reports institution payments for support on the present manuscript from AstraZeneca; grants from AstraZeneca, Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Novartis, Roche, Seagen, and Zenith Epigenetics; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Gilead, iTEOS, Lilly, MSD, Relay Therapeutics, Roche, SeaGen, and Pierre-Fabre; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Gilead, Libbs, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, and AstraZeneca Taiwan; fees for meetings or travel from Eisai and Gilead; and other financial or non-financial interests as the head of the SOLTI Breast Cancer Group. EH reports institution payments for support on the present manuscript from AstraZeneca; grants from AbbVie, Accutar Biotechnology, Acerta Pharma, ADC Therapeutics, AKESOBIO Australia, Amgen, Aravive, ArQule, Artios, Arvinas, AtlasMedx, Black Diamond, Bliss BioPharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cascadian Therapeutics, Clovis, Compugen, Context Therapeutics, Cullen-Florentine, Curis, CytomX, Daiichi Sankyo, Dana Farber Cancer Inst, Dantari, Deciphera, Duality Biologics, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Ellipses Pharma, Elucida Oncology, EMD Serono, Fochon, FujiFilm, G1 Therapeutics, H3 Biomedicine, Harpoon, Hutchinson MediPharma, Immunogen, Immunomedics, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, InvestisBio, Jacobio, Karyopharm, Leap Therapeutics, Lilly, Lycera, Mabspace Biosciences, Macrogenics, MedImmune, Merck, Mersana, Merus, Millennium, Molecular Templates, Myriad Genetic Labratories, Novartis, Nucana, Olema, OncoMed, Onconova Therapeutics, ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Orinove, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Pionyr Immunotherapeutics, Plexxikon, Radius Health, Regeneron, Relay Therapeutics, Repertoire Immune Medicine, Rgenix, Roche/Genentech, SeaGen, Sermonix Pharmaceuticals, Shattuck Labs, Silverback, StemCentRx, Sutro, Syndax, Syros, Taiho, TapImmune, Tesaro, Tolmar, Torque Therapeutics, Treadwell Therapeutics, Verastem, Vincerx Pharma, Zenith Epigenetics, and Zymeworks; and consulting fees from Arcus, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, Black Diamond, Boehringer Ingelheim, CytomX, Daiichi Sankyo, Dantari, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Ellipses Pharma, Greenwich Lifesciences, H3 Biomedicine, iTeos, Janssen, Lilly, Loxo, Merck, Mersana, Novartis, Orum Therapeutics, Pfizer, Propella Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology, Relay Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, SeaGen, Stemline Therapeutics, Silverback Therapeutics, and Verascity Science. PN reports institution payments for support on the present manuscript from AstraZeneca; grants from Sanofi; consulting fees paid to institution from Hoffman/La Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Radius Health, Roche, and Teva; fees for meetings or travel from Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Hoffmann/La Roche; and other financial or non-financial interests as Chair BIG-SENO VVOG Steering committee member of MONARCH-2 and MONARCH-E, SERENA-2 external advisory role for the reimbursement committee, and commission of personalised medicine of Belgian Government. CZ reports institution payments for support on the present manuscript from AstraZeneca; grants from Novartis, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seagen; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Gilead, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, MSD, Eisai, and GSK; fees for meetings or travel from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Eisai, GSK, ExactSciences, and Clovis; and participation on a data monitoring committee or advisory board for Roche Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Eisai, GSK, and Daiichi Sankyo. HD reports institution payments for support on the present manuscript from AstraZeneca; consulting fees from Pfizer, Roche, PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, GSK, MSD, Seagen, and Gilead; honoraria from PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, GSK, MSD, Teva, Seagen, and Gilead; honoraria received by institution from Pfizer and Roche; and fees for meetings or travel from Pfizer, Roche, PharmaMar, Teva, AstraZeneca, MSD, GSK, and Gilead. ZH reports institution payments for support on the present manuscript from AstraZeneca and lecture fees. ZT and RvZ are employees of Parexel and report institution payments for support on the present manuscript from AstraZeneca. DP, ZN, YK, TA, YH, TM, GN, VV, AN, and EA report institution payments for support on the present manuscript from AstraZeneca. MA, BK, TK, JPOL, DL, AM, and CJM are employees of AstraZeneca and own stock or stock options. FF declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The APHINITY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358877) previously demonstrated that pertuzumab added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for patients with early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC). Here, we report the preplanned third interim analysis of overall survival (OS) and a descriptive updated iDFS analysis with 8.4 years of median follow-up of 4,804 patients in the intent-to-treat population. The 8-year OS was 92.7% in the pertuzumab versus 92.0% in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.02]; P = .078, above the 0.006 significance threshold). The HR was 0.80 [95% CI 0.63 to 1.00] in the node-positive cohort and 0.99 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.55] in the node-negative cohort. Updated results of 8-year iDFS in the node-positive cohort showed an absolute improvement of 4.9% favoring pertuzumab (86.1% v 81.2%; HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87]). The node-negative cohort did well without adding pertuzumab (8-year iDFS and OS in the placebo group were 93.3% and 96.4%, respectively). The iDFS benefit was seen in the hormone receptor-negative (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06]) and HR+ cohorts (HR of 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92]). Despite improvement in overall iDFS, the addition of pertuzumab did not improve OS at this third interim analysis.

Purpose: Long-term outcomes of patients with stage I human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) remain undefined, and prognostic predictors represent an unmet need., Methods: In the ATEMPT phase II trial, patients with stage I centrally confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned 3:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 for 1 year or paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (TH). Coprimary objectives were to compare the incidence of clinically relevant toxicities between arms and to evaluate invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with T-DM1. Correlative analyses included the HER2DX genomic tool, multiomic evaluations of HER2 heterogeneity, and predictors of thrombocytopenia., Results: After a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 11 iDFS events were observed in the T-DM1 arm, consistent with a 5-year iDFS of 97.0% (95% CI, 95.2 to 98.7). At 5 years, the recurrence-free interval (RFI) was 98.3% (95% CI, 97.0 to 99.7), the overall survival was 97.8% (95% CI, 96.3 to 99.3), and the breast cancer-specific survival was 99.4% (95% CI, 98.6 to 100). Comparable iDFS was observed with T-DM1 irrespective of tumor size, hormone receptor status, centrally determined HER2 immunohistochemical score, and receipt of T-DM1 for more or less than 6 months. Although ATEMPT was not powered for this end point, the 5-year iDFS in the TH arm was 91.1%. Among patients with sufficient tissue for HER2DX testing (n = 187), 5-year outcomes significantly differed according to HER2DX risk score, with better RFI (98.1% v 81.8%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.10, P = .01) and iDFS (96.3% v 81.8%, HR, 0.20, P = .047) among patients with HER2DX low-risk versus high-risk tumors, respectively., Conclusion: Adjuvant T-DM1 for 1 year leads to outstanding long-term outcomes for patients with stage I HER2-positive breast cancer. A high HER2DX risk score predicted a higher risk of recurrence in ATEMPT.

Background: Chemotherapy is crucial for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, and its survival benefits may outweigh adverse events. Oncotype DX (ODX) assesses this balance; however, it is expensive. Using nomograms to identify cases requiring ODX may be economically beneficial. We aimed to identify clinicopathological variables that correlated with the recurrence score (RS) and develop a nomogram that predicted the RS., Methods: We included 457 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with metastases in fewer than four axillary lymph nodes who underwent surgery and ODX at our hospital between 2007 and 2023. We developed nomograms and internally validated them in 310 patients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2021 and validated the model's performance in 147 patients who underwent surgery between 2022 and 2023., Results: Logistic regression analysis revealed that progesterone receptor (PgR) level, histological grade (HG), and Ki67 index independently predicted the RS. A nomogram was developed using these variables to predict the RS (area under the curve [AUC], 0.870; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.92). The nomogram was applied to the model validation group (AUC, 0.877; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95). When the sensitivity of the nomogram was 90%, the model was able to identify 52.3% low-RS and 41.2% high-RS cases not requiring ODX., Conclusions: This was the first nomogram model developed based on data from a cohort of Japanese women. It may help determine the indications for ODX and the use of nomogram to identify cases requiring ODX may be economically beneficial., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women, with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) being the predominant subtype. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel antibody-drug conjugate, has emerged as a promising treatment for metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety., Methods: Adhering to "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023. We included clinical trials and observational studies evaluating SG in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast, the secondary outcomes included overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of response (DOR), and adverse event profiles. Review Manager (Version 5.4) was used for the statistical analysis., Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review; 2 were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.34-0.83; P = 0.005; I2 = 86%) for PFSl and a hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.36-1.11; P = 0.11; I2 = 92%) for overall survival. The pooled analysis of the duration of response showed significant results with a standard mean difference = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.03-0.42; P = 0.02; I2 = 61%)., Conclusion: SG demonstrates significant benefit in PFS and duration of response in patients of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: In the evolving landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) management, liquid biopsy offers unprecedented opportunities for guiding clinical decisions. Here, we review the most recent findings on liquid biopsy applications in HER2-positive BC and its potential role in addressing challenges specific to this BC subtype., Recent Findings: Recent studies have highlighted the significance of liquid biopsy analytes, primarily circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), in stratifying patients' prognosis, predicting treatment response, and monitoring tumor evolution in both early and advanced stages of BC. Liquid biopsy holds promise in studying minimal residual disease to detect and potentially treat disease recurrence before it manifests clinically. Additionally, liquid biopsy may have significant implication in the management of brain metastasis, a major challenge in HER2-positive BC, and could redefine parameters for determining HER2 positivity. Combining ctDNA and CTCs is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of HER2-positive tumors, as they provide complementary insights., Summary: Research efforts are needed to address analytical challenges, validate, and broaden the application of liquid biopsy in HER2-positive BC. This effort will ultimately facilitate its integration into clinical practice, optimizing the care of patients with HER2-positive tumors., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Secretory carcinoma of breast (SCB) typically harbours ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry analysis (IHC) has been shown to be sensitive for SCB diagnosis. However, weak focal pan-Trk nuclear staining was previously found in 10% of non-secretory breast carcinomas. To further examine pan-Trk IHC specificity, we evaluated pan-Trk staining in various breast carcinoma subtypes., Methods: The study cohort consisted of 346 invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs), including 8 SCBs and 48 triple-negative histological mimickers (36 metaplastic carcinomas, including 12 matrix-producing carcinomas; 5 adenoid cystic carcinomas; 5 apocrine carcinomas; 2 acinic cell carcinomas), 101 triple-negative IBCs of no special type, 101 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative IBCs and 88 HER2-positive IBCs. Six salivary gland secretory carcinomas were also included. Pan-Trk IHC was performed on tumours using a rabbit monoclonal pan-Trk antibody. Any nuclear staining in the invasive carcinoma cells was considered positive., Results: All 14 secretory carcinomas from breast and salivary gland exhibited moderate to strong pan-Trk nuclear staining. In contrast, no pan-Trk nuclear staining was identified in any of the 338 non-secretory IBCs. Focal cytoplasmic pan-Trk staining was observed in nine non-secretory IBCs (2.7%), and was considered nonspecific and negative., Conclusions: Our results indicate that pan-Trk nuclear staining is highly specific for SCB. In low-grade to intermediate-grade IBCs that share histological features with SCB, adding pan-Trk to a routing panel of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/HER2 is highly diagnostic. Our results also support using pan-Trk IHC to differentiate SCB from its triple-negative histological mimickers, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, matrix-producing carcinoma, apocrine carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Aim: The 2015 UK guidelines for HER2 assessment in breast cancer recommended repeat assessment if the core biopsy was scored as 2+ on HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) with borderline negative in situ hybridisation (ratio of number of HER2 to chromosome 17 centromere copies of 1.8-1.99). This case series aimed to assess the value of such repeat assessment in the surgical specimen, in particular the proportion that were HER2 positive., Methods: Details of biopsies with 2+ IHC and borderline negative in situ hybridisation were extracted from a database. The results of repeat HER2 testing in the surgical specimen for this cohort study were then obtained., Results: 112 patients with no preoperative treatment had repeat assessment: 4 were 3+ and 16 were 2+ amplified. Of 14 with preoperative chemotherapy, 1 was 3+ and 4 were 2+ amplified. All the 2+ amplified carcinomas had a HER2 to chromosome 17 ratio less than 4, in 50% the ratio was between 2.0 and 2.2, and in 50% the HER2 copy number was less than 4., Conclusions: Repeat assessment yielded 4% 3+ results and 14% 2+ amplified carcinomas but with low level amplification. These results suggest that retesting of borderline negative HER2 cases should be optional and no longer mandatory., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Although surgery remains the primary treatment for gastric cancer (GC), the identification of effective alternative treatments for individuals for whom surgery is unsuitable holds significance. HER2 overexpression occurs in approximately 15%-20% of advanced GC cases, directly affecting treatment-related decisions. Spectral-computed tomography (sCT) enables the quantification of material compositions, and sCT iodine concentration parameters have been demonstrated to be useful for the diagnosis of GC and prediction of its invasion depth, angiogenesis, and response to systemic chemotherapy. No existing report describes the prediction of GC HER2 status through histogram analysis based on sCT iodine maps (IMs)., Aim: To investigate whether whole-volume histogram analysis of sCT IMs enables the prediction of the GC HER2 status., Methods: This study was performed with data from 101 patients with pathologically confirmed GC who underwent preoperative sCT examinations. Nineteen parameters were extracted via sCT IM histogram analysis: The minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, variance, coefficient of variation, skewness, kurtosis, entropy, percentiles (1 st , 5 th , 10 th , 25 th , 50 th , 75 th , 90 th , 95 th , and 99 th ), and lesion volume. Spearman correlations of the parameters with the HER2 status and clinicopathological parameters were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the parameters' diagnostic performance., Results: Values for the histogram parameters of the maximum, mean, standard deviation, variance, entropy, and percentiles were significantly lower in the HER2+ group than in the HER2- group (all P < 0.05). The GC differentiation and Lauren classification correlated significantly with the HER2 status of tumor tissue ( P = 0.001 and 0.023, respectively). The 99 th percentile had the largest area under the curve for GC HER2 status identification (0.740), with 76.2%, sensitivity, 65.0% specificity, and 67.3% accuracy. All sCT IM histogram parameters correlated positively with the GC HER2 status ( r = 0.237-0.337, P = 0.001-0.017)., Conclusion: Whole-lesion histogram parameters derived from sCT IM analysis, and especially the 99 th percentile, can serve as imaging biomarkers of HER2 overexpression in GC., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Conventional assays such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) used in clinical procedures for quantification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status in breast cancer have many limitations. In the current study, we have used HER2 expression in a broad range of breast cancer phenotypes to explore the potential utility of a novel immunodetection technique using Raman spectroscopy and Raman imaging combined with artificial intelligence models. The correlations between the Raman method and conventional HER2 testing methodologies (IHC and ISH) have been tested. Raman measurements showed a strong linear correlation ( p = 0.05, R 2 =0,9816) with IHC analysis in the studied breast cell lines: MCF-10A, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, HTB-30 (SK-BR-3), and AU-565 represent normal, nontumorigenic epithelial cells, triple-positive breast carcinoma, and triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Analytic testing of Raman spectroscopy and Raman imaging demonstrated that this method may offer advantages over the currently used diagnostic methodologies.

The detection of a single biomarker is prone to false negative or false positive results. Simultaneous analysis of two biomarkers can greatly improve the accuracy of diagnosis. In this work, we designed a new method for coinstantaneous detection of two breast cancer biomarkers miRNA-21 and HER2 using the properties of duplex-specific nuclease (DSN). Cy5-labeled DNA1 and FAM-labeled DNA2 are used as signal probes to distinguish the two signals. When the sample contains the targets HER2 and miRNA-21, HER2 binds to the HER2 aptamer on the double-stranded DNA2, while miRNA-21 binds to the complementary DNA1. Then, DSN enzyme is added to cut the DNA probes adsorbed on the HER2 aptamer and miRNA-21, releasing the fluorescent groups, which can be readsorbed to the empty sites, thus repeating the cutting of the probes and producing an exponential signal amplification with two distinct fluorescent signals. The detection limits of miRNA-21 and HER2 are 1.12 pM and 0.36 ng mL -1 , respectively, with linear ranges of 5 pM to 50 pM and 1 ng mL -1 to 15 ng mL -1 . The method was validated in real biological samples, providing a new approach for synchronous analysis of important markers in breast cancer.

Purpose: The proven efficacy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugate therapy for treating HER2-low breast cancers necessitates more accurate and reproducible HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring. We aimed to validate performance and utility of a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI) solution for interpreting HER2 IHC in breast carcinoma., Materials and Methods: A two-arm multireader study of 120 HER2 IHC whole-slide images from four sites assessed HER2 scoring by four surgical pathologists without and with the aid of an AI HER2 solution. Both arms were compared with high-confidence ground truth (GT) established by agreement of at least four of five breast pathology subspecialists according to ASCO/College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2018/2023 guidelines., Results: The mean interobserver agreement among GT pathologists across all HER2 scores was 72.4% (N = 120). The AI solution demonstrated high accuracy for HER2 scoring, with 92.1% agreement on slides with high confidence GT (n = 92). The use of the AI tool led to improved performance by readers, interobserver agreement increased from 75.0% for digital manual read to 83.7% for AI-assisted review, and scoring accuracy improved from 85.3% to 88.0%. For the distinction of HER2 0 from 1+ cases (n = 58), pathologists supported by AI showed significantly higher interobserver agreement (69.8% without AI v 87.4% with AI) and accuracy (81.9% without AI v 88.8% with AI)., Conclusion: This study demonstrated utility of a fully automated AI solution to aid in scoring HER2 IHC accurately according to ASCO/CAP 2018/2023 guidelines. Pathologists supported by AI showed improvements in HER2 IHC scoring consistency and accuracy, especially for distinguishing HER2 0 from 1+ cases. This AI solution could be used by pathologists as a decision support tool for enhancing reproducibility and consistency of HER2 scoring and particularly for identifying HER2-low breast cancers.

Recent studies have revealed an association between TP53 mutations and endocrine resistance in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (HR + HER2 -BC). Aberrant p53 immunostaining (IHC) patterns may provide a surrogate marker for TP53 mutations. Building upon a ternary algorithm of aberrant staining patterns, this study evaluates the reliability of p53 IHC as screening tool for TP53 mutations in BC (NST). Furthermore, it describes the histopathological and molecular characteristics of TP53-mutated cases, along with the mutational status of PIK3CA. This study comprised 131 early-stage, node-negative BCs with available core biopsies and resection specimens. Cases were categorized as follows: HR + HER2 - (85 cases), HER2 + (21 cases) and triple negative (TN, 25 cases). Aberrant IHC staining patterns for p53 were defined as overexpression (OE), complete absence (CA) and cytoplasmic (CY). In addition, targeted sequencing of TP53 and PIK3CA genes was performed. TP53 mutations were identified in 53 of 126 cases (42.1%). Within HR + HER2 - cases, TP53 mutations were found in 17 of 80 cases (21.3%). IHC accurately predicted TP53 mutation in 96.2% of cases with a specificity of 100%. Additionally, there was a significant agreement between missense mutations and OE, as well as between truncating mutations and CA (κ 73% and 76%). CY was observed in two TN cases with truncating mutations within the nuclear localization signalling domain of p53. TP53-mutated cases exhibited higher grade, greater nuclear pleomorphism and higher Ki-67 proliferation index and were associated with the PIK3CA wild-type status (p < 0.001). p53 IHC may provide a useful screening tool for identifying TP53-mutated BC of NST., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: While human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is upregulated in endometrial carcinoma-especially in the p53 aberrant type- conventional anti-HER2 therapy is not typically used for this cancer type. Recently, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates have shown antitumor effects against HER2 low-expressing cancers. Therefore, we analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-positive endometrial carcinomas including those with low expression, as well as the prognostic significance of p53 and HER2 co-expression., Methods: Immunohistochemistry for HER2 and p53 was performed in 530 patients with endometrial carcinoma; 124 cases (23%) were HER2-positive., Results: Of the HER2-positive cases, >50% were 1+. A high prevalence of HER2 expression was observed in serous (64%), clear-cell (73%), and mixed (64%) carcinomas. Notably, 19% of endometrioid carcinomas were HER2-positive. HER2 positivity was significantly associated with age ≥60 years, high-grade histological subtype, deep myometrium invasion, stage III/IV, recurrence, and death. Univariate analysis showed that HER2-positive cases had reduced progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.007) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.012). However, after adjusting for stage, HER2 positivity was not associated with survival. In the early stage, co-expression of HER2-positive and p53 aberrant types was associated with shorter PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001) compared with at least one negative result. Multivariate analysis of PFS showed HER2 and p53 co-expression (hazard ratio, 1.891; 95% confidence interval, 1.183-5.971, p = 0.008) as an independent prognostic factor., Conclusions: This study presents detailed clinicopathological characteristics and the prognostic impact of HER2-positivity in endometrial carcinomas. HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate therapy may be broadly applicable to endometrial carcinoma., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although HER2-low breast cancer (BC) constitutes almost 50% of all BC types, its impact on the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival in early BC is uncertain. As a result, a systematic review was conducted to compare the pCR rate and survival of HER2-low and HER2-zero BC in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting. Two reviewers independently performed literature searches using EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Libraries internet databases up to June 2023. Finally, 29 studies with 178,294 patients were included. HER2-low BC had a considerably lower pCR rate compared to HER2-zero BC in the entire population (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.68, P < .001) and in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive subgroup (RR = 0.73, P = .009), but not in the HR-negative subgroup (RR = 0.99, P = .755). Furthermore, patients with HER2-low BC exhibited prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with HER2-zero BC, observed in both the entire cohort (DFS: P = .004; OS: P = .008) and the HR-negative subgroup (DFS: P = .009; OS: P < .001). In the HR-positive population, OS was superior in HER2-low BC patients (P < .001), whereas no significant differences in DFS were observed (P = .064). Our findings imply that the pCR rate and prognosis of HER2-low BC are distinguished from those of HER2-zero BC in early BC treated with NACT, which contributes to a better knowledge of the BC subgroup., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Although circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have demonstrated considerable importance in liquid biopsy, their detection is limited by low concentrations and complex sample components. Herein, we developed a homogeneous, simple, and high-sensitivity strategy targeting breast cancer cells. This method was based on a non-immunological stepwise centrifugation preprocessing approach to isolate CTCs from whole blood. Precise quantification is achieved through the specific binding of aptamers to the overexpressed mucin 1 (MUC1) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) proteins of breast cancer cells. Subsequently, DNAzyme cleavage and parallel catalytic hairpin assembly (CHA) reactions on the cholesterol-stacking DNA machine were initiated, which opened the hairpin structures T-Hg 2+ -T and C-Ag + -C, enabling multiple amplifications. This leads to the fluorescence signal reduction from Hg 2+ -specific carbon dots (CDs) and CdTe quantum dots (QDs) by released ions. This strategy demonstrated a detection performance with a limit of detection (LOD) of 3 cells/mL and a linear range of 5-100 cells/mL. 42 clinical samples have been validated, confirming their consistency with clinical imaging, pathology findings and the folate receptor (FR)-PCR kit results, exhibiting desirable specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 80.6%. These results highlight the promising applicability of our method for diagnosing and monitoring breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aims to analyze potential differences in clinicopathology, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and clinical outcome among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow and HER2-low breast cancers., Methods: Consecutive cases of HER2-negative breast cancer that received NAT were included. They were classified as HER2-null (no staining), HER2-ultralow (incomplete faint staining in ≤ 10% of tumour cells) and HER2-low (HER2-1 + or HER2-2+, in situ hybridisation negative). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the HER2 expression level., Results: Out of 302 patients, 215 (71.19%) were HER2-low, 59 (19.54%) were HER2-ultralow, and 28 (9.27%) were HER2-null. In comparison to the HER2-ultralow group, the HER2-low group exhibited higher expression frequencies of ER (p < 0.001), PR (p < 0.001), and AR (p = 0.004), along with a greater prevalence of the luminal subtype (p < 0.001). The HER2-ultralow group also demonstrated a higher prevalence of lymph node metastasis compared to the HER2-null group (p = 0.026). Varied rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were observed among the three subgroups: HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low, with rates of 35.71%, 22.03%, and 12.56%, respectively. Only the HER2-low subgroup exhibited a significant difference compared to HER2-null (p = 0.001). Despite variations in pCR rates, the three subgroups exhibited comparable disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.571). Importantly, we found HER2-low patients with better treatment response (RCB-0/I) exhibited significantly better DFS than those with significant residual disease (RCB-II/III) (P = 0.036). The overall rate of HER2 immunohistochemical score discordance was 45.24%, mostly driven by the conversion between HER2-0 and HER2-low phenotype. Notably, 32.19% of cases initially classified as HER2-0 phenotype on baseline biopsy were later reclassified as HER2-low after neoadjuvant therapy, and it is noteworthy that 22 out of these cases (78.57%) originally had an HER2-ultralow status in the pretreatment biopsy sample., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the distinct clinicopathological features of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast tumors and confirm that RCB is an effective predictor of prognosis in HER2-low populations for the first time. Notably, our findings demonstrate high instability in both HER2-low and HER2-ultralow expression from the primary baseline biopsy to residual disease after NAT. Furthermore, this study is the first to investigate the clinicopathological feature and the effectiveness of NAT for HER2-ultralow breast cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Exosomes, nanosized extracellular vesicles containing biomolecular cargo, are increasingly recognized as promising noninvasive biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, particularly for their role in carrying tumor-specific molecular information. Traditional methods for exosome detection face challenges such as complexity, time consumption, and the need for sophisticated equipment. This study addresses these challenges by introducing a novel droplet microfluidic platform integrated with a surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-based aptasensor for the rapid and sensitive detection of HER2-positive exosomes from breast cancer cells. Our approach utilized an on-chip salt-induced gold nanoparticles (GNPs) aggregation process in the presence of HER2 aptamers and HER2-positive exosomes, enhancing the hot spot-based SERS signal amplification. This platform achieved a limit of detection of 4.5 log 10 particles/mL with a sample-to-result time of 5 min per sample. Moreover, this platform has been successfully applied for HER2 status testing in clinical samples to distinguish HER2-positive breast cancer patients from HER2-negative breast cancer patients. High sensitivity, specificity, and the potential for high-throughput screening of specific tumor exosomes make this SERS-based droplet system a potential liquid biopsy technology for early cancer diagnosis.

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology , to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Background: Many types of cancer express the HER2/HER3 heterodimer, which is a crucial oncogenic unit. Research has shown that when these two biomarkers are expressed together, it correlates with higher tumor aggressiveness and lower overall survival rate. Therefore, many therapies have been developed to target both biomarkers simultaneously. This study aims to collect data on the co-expression levels of these biomarkers across different types of cancers., Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies. The event rates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Heterogeneity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were conducted based on patients' residency region, age, and gender. The protocol of this study was registered in PROSPERO under ID: CRD42024504256., Results: We have detected 60 studies that met all of the inclusion criteria for our research. Out of these, we have focused on a total of 19 studies (with 6,079 participants) related to breast cancer, 9 studies (with 829 participants) related to lung cancer, 6 studies (with 1423 participants) related to gastric cancer, and 4 studies (with 802 participants) related to colorectal cancer for conducting our meta-analysis. According to our results, the co-expression rate of HER2 and HER3 in breast cancer patients is 18.5% (95%CI 11.7-27.9), in colorectal cancer patients is 17.1% (95%CI 2.4-63.4), in gastric cancer patients is 11.3% (95%CI 4.2-17.2), and in lung cancer patients is 12.7% (95%CI 5.2-22.8). The co-expression of HER2 and HER3 in lung cancer has a significant association with patients' gender (P=0.038)., Conclusion: The study found that HER2 and HER3 biomarkers, which are targets for different therapies, are co-expressed in various types of cancer.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched breast cancer benefits significantly from anti-HER2 targeted therapies. This highlights the critical need for precise HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) interpretation serving as a triage tool for selecting patients for anti-HER2 regimens. Recently, the emerging eligibility of patients with HER2-low breast cancers for a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (T-DXd) adds challenges to HER2 IHC scoring interpretation, notably in the 0-1+ range, which shows high interobserver and interlaboratory staining platform variability. In this review, we navigate evolving challenges and suggest practical recommendations for HER2 IHC interpretation., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Recently, low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein expression has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for response to the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in metastatic breast cancer. HER2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has never been carefully measured, and little is known about the frequency of cases with unamplified but detectable levels of the protein. Although some HER2-targeted therapies have been studied in NSCLC patients, they have been restricted to those with genomic ERBB2 gene alterations, which only represent relatively rare cases of NSCLC. Still, emerging investigations of T-DXd in NSCLC have shown promise in patients with unamplified HER2. Taken together, we hypothesize that there may be many cases of NSCLC with levels of HER2 protein expression comparable with levels seen in breast cancer that benefit from T-DXd. Here, we used a previously validated, analytic, quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) assay that is more sensitive than legacy clinical HER2 immunohistochemistry assays. We measured HER2 protein levels in NSCLC cases to determine the proportion of cases with detectable HER2 expression. Using cell line calibration microarrays alongside our QIF method enabled us to convert HER2 signal into units of attomoles per mm 2 . We found that over 63% of the 741 analyzed NSCLC cases exhibited HER2 expression above the limit of detection, with more than 17% of them exceeding the lower limit of quantification. Although the threshold for response to T-DXd in breast cancer is still unknown, many cases of NSCLC have expression in a range comparable to breast cancer cases with immunohistochemistry scores of 1+ or 2+. Our assay could potentially select NSCLC cases with a detectable target (ie, HER2) that might benefit from HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, irrespective of ERBB2 genomic alterations., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context.—: Biomarkers in breast cancer need strict monitoring given their role in patient management., Objective.—: To study the impact that regular participation in the National Cancer Grid (NCG) external quality assurance (EQA) system has on concordance rates for biomarkers in breast carcinoma., Design.—: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing breast carcinomas were circulated to participating laboratories that performed immunohistochemistry for breast biomarkers. The returned TMAs were then assessed for test concordance., Results.—: A total of 105 laboratories participated in the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) EQA system cycles, and 99 centers participated in the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) EQA system. In the ER EQA in the first cycle only 1 laboratory had a 100% concordance rate, which improved to 59 of 77 (76.6%) and 85 of 97 (87.6%) in the fourth and fifth cycles, respectively. In the PR EQA the 100% pass rate jumped from zero to 52 of 76 (68.4%) in the fourth cycle and 86 of 97 (88.6%) in the last cycle. For HER2 EQA, the 100% pass rates were seen in 7 of 23 laboratories (30.4%) in the first cycle, 49 of 78 laboratories (62.8%) in the fourth cycle, and 48 of 94 laboratories (51.1%) in fifth cycle of EQA. Centers that participated in the NCG EQA system for a longer period often changed testing methodology, with consequent improvement in their laboratory concordance rates. An increasing trend for the use of automated platforms and of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved antibody for HER2 testing was observed., Conclusions.—: Our experience demonstrates that laboratory performance improves with participation in an EQA system even in less perfect settings, and this drives the placement of more proficient practices across the country., Competing Interests: The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article., (© 2024 College of American Pathologists.)

Background: HER2 is a key biomarker for breast cancer treatment and prognosis. Traditional assessment methods like immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are effective but costly and time-consuming. Our model incorporates these methods alongside photoacoustic imaging to enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide more comprehensive clinical insights., Materials and Methods: A total of 301 breast tumors were included in this study, divided into HER2-positive (3+ or 2+ with gene amplification) and HER2-negative (below 3+ and 2+ without gene amplification) groups. Samples were split into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Statistical analyses involved t-tests, chi-square tests, and rank-sum tests. Predictive factors were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, leading to the creation of three models: ModA (clinical factors only), ModB (clinical plus ultrasound factors), and ModC (clinical, ultrasound, and photoacoustic imaging-derived oxygen saturation (SO2))., Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for ModA was 0.756 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.82), ModB increased to 0.866 (95 % CI: 0.82-0.91), and ModC showed the highest performance with an AUC of 0.877 (95 % CI: 0.83-0.92). These results indicate that the comprehensive model combining clinical, ultrasound, and photoacoustic imaging data (ModC) performed best in predicting HER2 expression., Conclusion: The findings suggest that integrating clinical, ultrasound, and photoacoustic imaging data significantly enhances the accuracy of predicting HER2 expression. For personalised breast cancer treatment, the integrated model could provide a comprehensive and reproducible decision support tool., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In this study, we present a novel biomarker detection platform employing a modified S-tapered fiber coated with gold nanoparticle/graphene oxide (GNP/GO) for quantifying human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) concentrations, using antibodies as sensing elements. The fabrication of this device involves implementing an in-situ layer-by-layer technique coupled with a chemical adsorption step to achieve the self-assembly of GNP, GO, and antibodies on the STF surface. The detection mechanism relies on monitoring the refractive index changes induced by the adsorption of HER2 onto the immobilized antibodies. For comparative analysis, both monoclonal antibody (mAb) and the novel nanobody (Nb) were employed in constructing the STF immunosensor, referred to as the mAb immunosensor and Nb immunosensor, respectively. Spectral analysis results highlight that the Nb immunosensor exhibits twice the sensitivity of the mAb immunosensor. This enhanced sensitivity is attributed to the small size, high antigen affinity, strong specificity, and structural stability of Nb. The Nb immunosensor demonstrated an impressive detection limit of 0.001 nM for HER2, surpassing the detection limit of the mAb immunosensor. These findings underscore the potential of the proposed Nb immunosensor as a promising and sensitive tool for HER2 detection, contributing to the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. Furthermore, the simplicity of production and excellent optical performance position the Nb immunosensor as a prospective real-time biosensor with minimal cytotoxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Guangyong Jin reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. Yongsen Yu reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer exhibits an aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis. The application of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with breast cancer can significantly reduce the risks of disease recurrence and improve survival. By integrating different clinicopathological factors, nomograms are valuable tools for prognosis prediction. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of clinicopathological factors in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and construct a nomogram for outcome prediction., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data from 374 patients with breast cancer admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2009 and December 2017, who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer through preoperative core needle biopsy pathology, underwent surgical resection after NAT, and were HER2-positive. Patients were randomly divided into a training and validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results of the multivariate analysis were used to create nomograms predicting 3-, 5-, and 8-year overall survival (OS) rates. Calibration curves were plotted to test concordance between the predicted and actual risks. Harrell C-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the discriminability of the nomogram prediction model., Results: All included patients were women, with a mean age of 50 ± 10.4 years (range: 26-72 years). In the training set, both univariate and multivariate analyses identified residual cancer burden (RCB) class, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes(TILs), and clinical stage as independent prognostic factors for OS, and these factors were combined to construct a nomogram. The calibration curves demonstrated good concordance between the predicted and actual risks, and the C-index of the nomogram was 0.882 (95 % CI 0.863-0.901). The 3-, 5-, and 8-year areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.909, 0.893, and 0.918, respectively, indicating good accuracy of the nomogram. The calibration curves also demonstrated good concordance in the validation set, with a C-index of 0.850 (95 % CI 0.804-0.896) and 3-, 5-, and 8-year AUCs of 0.909, 0.815, and 0.834, respectively, which also indicated good accuracy., Conclusion: The nomogram prediction model accurately predicted the prognostic status of post-NAT patients with breast cancer and was more accurate than clinical stage and RCB class. Therefore, it can serve as a reliable guide for selecting clinical treatment measures for breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors disclosed no relevant relationships. The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, author- ship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

This revised consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathological Anatomy (SEAP) updates the recommendations for biomarkers use in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer that we first published in 2018. The expert group recommends determining in early breast cancer the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2), as well as BReast CAncer (BRCA) genes in high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer, to assist prognosis and help in indicating the therapeutic options, including hormone therapy, chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and other targeted therapies. One of the four available genetic prognostic platforms (Oncotype DX ® , MammaPrint ® , Prosigna ® , or EndoPredict ® ) may be used in ER-positive patients with early breast cancer to establish a prognostic category and help decide with the patient whether adjuvant treatment may be limited to hormonal therapy. In second-line advanced breast cancer, in addition, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) should be tested in hormone-sensitive cases, BRCA gene mutations in HER2-negative cancers, and in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1). Newer biomarkers and technologies, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing, serine/threonine kinase (AKT) pathway activation, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), are at this point investigational., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that, when writing and revising the text, they did not know the names of the pharmaceutical companies that provided financial support for this project, so this support has not influenced the content of this article. Ethics approval The study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: Recently, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low (i.e. HER2 score 1+ or 2+ without amplification) breast cancer patients became eligible for trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment. To improve assay standardisation and detection of HER2-low in a quantitative manner, we conducted an external quality assessment-like study in the Netherlands. Dynamic range cell lines and immunohistochemistry (IHC) calibrators were used to quantify HER2 expression and to assess interlaboratory variability., Methods and Results: Three blank slides with a dynamic range cell line and an IHC calibrator were stained with routine HER2 assays by 35 laboratories. Four different antibody clones were used: 19 (54.3%) 4B5, six (17.1%) A0485, five (14.3%) DG44 (HercepTest) and five (14.3%) SP3. Laboratories used two different detection kits for 4B5 assays: 14 (73.7%) ultraView and five (26.3%) OptiView. Variability of HER2 expression in cell lines, measured with artificial intelligence software, was median (min-max) = negative core 0.5% (0.0-57.0), 1+ core 4.3% (1.6-71.3), 2+ core 42.8% (30.4-92.6) and 3+ core 96.2% (91.8-98.8). The calibrators DG44 and 4B5 OptiView had the highest analytical sensitivity, closely followed by 4B5 ultraView. SP3 was the least sensitive. Calibrators of A0485 assays were not analysable due to background staining., Conclusions: As assays were validated for detecting HER2-amplified tumours, not all assays and antibodies proved suitable for HER2-low detection. Some tests showed distinct expression in the negative cell line. Dynamic range cell line controls and quantitative analysis using calibrators demonstrated more interlaboratory variability than commonly appreciated. Revalidation of HER2 tests by laboratories is needed to ensure clinical applicable HER2-low assays., (© 2024 The Author(s). Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Rapid and accurate detection of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is crucial for the early diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. In this study, we reported an iron-manganese ion N-doped carbon single-atom catalyst (FeMn-NC etch /SAC) bimetallic peroxidase mimetic enzyme with abundant active sites etched by H 2 O 2 and further demonstrated unique advantages of single-atom bimetallic nanozymes in generating hydroxyl radicals by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. As a proof of concept, a portable device-dependent electrochemical-photothermal bifunctional immunoassay detection platform was designed to achieve reliable detection of HER2. In the enzyme-linked reaction, H 2 O 2 was generated by substrate catalysis via secondary antibody-labeled glucose oxidase (GOx), while FeMn-NC etch /SAC nanozymes catalyzed the decomposition of H 2 O 2 to form OH*, which catalyzed the conversion of 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) to ox-TMB. The ox-TMB generation was converted from the colorimetric signals to electrical and photothermal signals by applied potential and laser irradiation, which could be employed for the quantitative detection of HER2. With the help of this bifunctional detection technology, HER2 was accurately detected in two ways: photothermally, with a linear scope of 0.01 to 2.0 ng mL -1 and a limit of detection (LOD) of 7.5 pg mL -1 , and electrochemically, with a linear scope of 0.01 to 10 ng mL -1 at an LOD of 3.9 pg mL -1 . By successfully avoiding environmental impacts, the bifunctional-based immunosensing strategy offers strong support for accurate clinical detection.

To develop machine learning models based on preoperative dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics and to explore their potential prognostic value in the differential diagnosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low from HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). A total of 233 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and December 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. Of these, 103 cases were diagnosed as HER2-positive and 130 cases were HER2 low-expression BC. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique is employed to address the class imbalance problem. Patients were randomly split into a training set (163 cases) and a validation set (70 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics features from DCE-MRI second-phase imaging were extracted. Z-score normalization was used to standardize the radiomics features, and Pearson's correlation coefficient and recursive feature elimination were used to explore the significant features. Prediction models were constructed using 6 machine learning algorithms: logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, AdaBoost, decision tree, and auto-encoder. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and predictive models were evaluated according to the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. In the training set, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of all models were 1.000. However, in the validation set, the auto-encoder model's AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.994, 0.976, 0.972, and 0.978, respectively. The remaining models' AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 1.000. The DeLong test showed no statistically significant differences between the machine learning models in the training and validation sets (Z = 0, P = 1). Our study investigated the feasibility of using DCE-MRI-based radiomics features to predict HER2-low BC. Certain radiomics features showed associations with HER2-low BC and may have predictive value. Machine learning prediction models developed using these radiomics features could be beneficial for distinguishing between HER2-low and HER2-positive BC. These noninvasive preoperative models have the potential to assist in clinical decision-making for HER2-low breast cancer, thereby advancing personalized clinical precision., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Aims: Advanced gallbladder carcinoma (AGBC) carries a poor prognosis with dismal survival. There are no data regarding HER2/ERBB2 expression in AGBC. This study evaluated the overexpression of HER2/ERBB2 in cytological aspirates from AGBCs to identify potential patients for whom anti-HER2 targeted therapies can benefit., Methods: This prospective, case-control study was performed on 50 primary AGBC cases. A detailed cytomorphological assessment, followed by immunocytochemistry (ICC) for HER2/ERBB2, was performed on AGBC cell blocks. A similar number of age-matched and gender-matched resected chronic cholecystitis specimens were included as controls. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was performed in equivocal cases., Results: A total of 10 (20%) cases showed positive (3+), 19 (38%) equivocal (2+) expression and 21 (42%) were negative on HER2/ERBB2 ICC. None of the equivocal cases demonstrated HER2 amplification by FISH. Among the controls, none showed positive (3+) immunoexpression, 23 (46%) demonstrated equivocal expression and 27 (54%) were negative. On statistical analysis, HER2/ERBB2 overexpression was significantly associated with AGBC compared with the controls. Of all the clinical, radiological and cytomorphological parameters, the predominant papillary or acinar arrangements of the tumour cells were significantly associated with HER2/ERBB2 overexpression., Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the expression of HER2/ERBB2 on cytological aspirates in AGBC using ICC and FISH. HER2/ERBB2 overexpression(20%) was significantly associated with AGBC. Furthermore, predominant papillary or acinar arrangements of tumour cells in the cytological smears were significantly associated with HER2/ERBB2 overexpression. They can serve as potential predictors of HER2/ERBB2 overexpression to select AGBC patients for anti-HER2 targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: A head-to-head comparison of efficacy between a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus combination chemotherapy (CT) has never been reported in patients with clinically aggressive hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC)., Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial, pre/perimenopausal women with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line ribociclib (600 mg once daily; 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus letrozole/anastrozole and goserelin or investigator's choice of combination CT (docetaxel plus capecitabine, paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, or capecitabine plus vinorelbine). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Among 222 patients randomly assigned to ribociclib plus ET (n = 112) or combination CT (n = 110), 150 (67.6%) had symptomatic visceral metastases, 41 (18.5%) had rapid disease progression per investigator's judgment, and 31 (14.0%) had symptomatic nonvisceral disease. Overall, 106 (47.7%) patients had investigator-assessed visceral crisis. The median follow-up time was 37.0 months. At data cutoff, 31.3% (ribociclib arm) and 15.5% (CT arm) of patients had completed study treatment and transitioned to post-trial access. The median PFS was 21.8 months (ribociclib plus ET; [95% CI, 17.4 to 26.7]) and 12.8 months (combination CT; [95% CI, 10.1 to 18.4); hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87]; P = .003. The overall response rates and the median time to response in the ribociclib versus CT arms, respectively, were 66.1% and 61.8% and 4.9 months and 3.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.06]). Lower rates of symptomatic adverse events were observed in the ribociclib versus CT arm., Conclusion: First-line ribociclib plus ET showed a significant PFS benefit, similar response rates, and better tolerability over combination CT in patients with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC.

Background: Odontogenic cysts and tumors develop from the dental follicle of asymptomatic impacted teeth. Odontogenic tissues express the epidermal growth factor receptor family (EGFR), which mediates cell proliferation, survival, and neoplastic differentiation. The present study aimed to compare the immunohistochemical expression of EGFR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the dental follicle of impacted wisdom teeth with normal and abnormal radiographic size., Methods: In this analytical study, immunohistochemical staining of EGFR and HER2 was performed on 30 normal and 30 abnormal follicles of impacted third molars. Follicles with a width of <2.5 mm were considered normal, whereas those with a width of ≥2.5 mm were regarded as abnormal. The immunoreactive score (IRS) was used to report the expression levels of EGFR and HER2. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software. Age and sex were compared in normal and abnormal groups with independent t test and Chi square test, respectively. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: The EGFR and HER2 overall expression was high in all normal and abnormal follicles. The comparison of the percentage of stained cells and intensity of EGFR and HER2 staining in normal and abnormal follicles were not significantly different (P=0.73, P=0.63, P=0.95, respectively)., Conclusion: Due to the high expression of EGFR and HER2 in normal and abnormal follicles, as well as the lack of significant differences in these two groups, the radiographic size of dental follicles might not indicate the potential capabilities of their cells, and more research in this field is recommended., Competing Interests: None declared., (Copyright: © Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences.)

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is widely used in the treatment of triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), but its use in estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive/HER2-negative BC is questioned because of the low pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. This retrospective study assessed the mRNA-based MammaTyper® assay's capability of predicting pCR with NACT, and ER, PR, Ki67, and HER2 status at immunohistochemical (IHC) through transcriptomics., Methods: Diagnostic biopsies from 76 BC patients treated at the Cremona Hospital between 2012-2018 were analyzed. Relative mRNA expression levels of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR, and MKI67 were measured using the MammaTyper® kit and integrated into a pCR score. Predicting capability of pCR and standard IHC biomarkers could be assessed with ROC curves in 75 and 76 patients, respectively., Results: Overall, 68.0% patients obtained a MammaTyper® high-score and 32.0% a MammaTyper® low-score. Among high-score patients, 62.7% achieved pCR, compared to 16.7% in the low-score group (p = 0.0003). The binary MammaTyper® score showed good prediction of pCR in the overall cohort (area under curve [AUC] = 0.756) and in HR+/HER2-negative cases (AUC = 0.774). In cases with residual disease, the continuous MammaTyper® score correlated moderately with residual tumor size and decrease in tumor size. MammaTyper® showed substantial agreement with IHC for ESR1/ER and ERBB2/HER2, and moderate agreement for PGR/PR and MKI67/Ki67., Conclusion: Overall, MammaTyper® pCR score may serve as a standardized tool for predicting NACT response in HR+/HER2-negative BC, potentially guiding treatment strategies. Additionally, it could provide a more standardized and reproducible assessment of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 status., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Francesco Schettini reports honoraria from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo for educational events/materials and travel expenses from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo. Daniele Generali declares personal fees for educational events by Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichy-Sankyo, Roche; research funds from Astrazeneca, Novartis and LILT. Uğur Şahin is CEO and Mark Laible is an employee of BioNTech SE. Ralph M Wirtz is an employee of STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH. The other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: AMEERA-5 investigated amcenestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor [ER] degrader) plus palbociclib versus letrozole plus palbociclib as first-line treatment for ER-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (aBC)., Materials and Methods: In AMEERA-5 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04478266), a double-blind, double-dummy, international phase III trial, adult pre-/post-menopausal women and men without previous systemic therapy for ER+/HER2- aBC were randomly assigned 1:1 to amcenestrant 200 mg once daily + standard palbociclib dosage (125 mg once daily, 21 days on/7 days off) or letrozole 2.5 mg once daily + standard palbociclib dosage, stratified by de novo metastatic disease, postmenopausal women, and visceral metastasis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), compared using a stratified log-rank test with one-sided type I error rate of 2.5%. Secondary end points included overall survival (key secondary), pharmacokinetics, and safety., Results: Between October 14, 2020, and December 2, 2021, 1,068 patients were randomly assigned to amcenestrant + palbociclib (N = 534) or letrozole + palbociclib (N = 534). At the interim analysis (median follow-up 8.4 months), the stratified hazard ratio for PFS was 1.209 (95% CI, 0.939 to 1.557; one-sided P value = .9304); therefore, the study was stopped for futility. The 6-month PFS rate was 82.7% (95% CI, 79.0 to 85.8) with amcenestrant + palbociclib versus 86.9% (95% CI, 83.5 to 89.6) with letrozole + palbociclib. In the amcenestrant + palbociclib versus letrozole + palbociclib groups, treatment-emergent adverse events (any grade) occurred in 85.6% versus 85.4% of patients and grade ≥3 events in 46.3% versus 60.8%, respectively., Conclusion: The AMEERA-5 study was discontinued on the basis of the recommendation of the data monitoring committee at the interim futility analysis. No new safety signals were identified.

Introduction: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5-15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical ILCs. This study compared subtypes of ILC in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to biomarker profile., Methods: All patients with ILC treated in a single centre from January 2005 to December 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and outcome data was collected and analysed according to tumour biomarker profile., Results: A total of 582 patients with ILC were treated. Typical ILC was observed in 89.2% (n = 519) and atypical in 10.8% (n = 63). Atypical ILCs were of a higher grade (35% grade 3 vs 9.6% grade 3, p < 0.001). A larger proportion of atypical ILC received NACT (31.7% vs 6.9% p < 0.001). Atypical ILCs showed a greater response to NACT (mean RCB (Residual Cancer Burden Score) 2.46 vs mean RCB 3.41, p = 0.0365), and higher pathological complete response rates (15% vs 0% p = 0.017). Despite this, overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients with typical ILC (91% vs 83%, p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Atypical ILCs have distinct characteristics. They are more frequently of a higher grade and demonstrate a superior response to NACT. Despite the latter, atypical ILCs have a worse 5-year DFS which should be taken into consideration in terms of prognostication and may assist patient selection for NACT., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this population-based cohort study was to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared to adjuvant chemotherapy in prognosis among patients with HR+/HER2 negative breast cancer., Method: This population-based study utilized data from the research database BCBaSe 3.0, based on the Swedish National Quality breast cancer register, including all patients with breast cancer diagnosis in Sweden between 2008 and 2019. Propensity score matching approach was applied. The outcomes of interest consisted of distant-disease free (DDFS), breast-cancer specific (BCSS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: In total, 14 459 patients were included in the study cohort of whom 2086 received NACT. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 1539 patients in each study group were available for analyses. No statistically significant difference in survival outcomes were observed between patients treated with NACT compared to those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (Hazard Ratio (HR) for DDFS: 1.20; 95 % CI: 0.80-1.79; HR for BCSS: 1.16; 95 % CI: 0.54-2.49; HR for OS: 1.14; 95 % CI: 0.64-2.05)., Conclusion: In this population-based cohort study of patients with HR+/HER2-breast cancer, the use of NACT seems to be comparable to adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of prognosis, although non-inferiority cannot be proven by this study design. Until further evidence suggesting a survival benefit in favor of either treatment is available, NACT can be pursued when surgical-de-escalation is intended., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The DESTINY Breast-04 trial revealed survival advantages of trastuzumab deruxtecan for women with metastatic HER2-low breast cancer (1+ or 2+ immunohistochemistry [IHC], without amplification). Although this trial applied the 2018 Americal Society of Clinial Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) HER2 IHC scoring criteria, the subjectivity and imprecision in IHC scoring have raised concerns that patients' treatment may be misaligned. Our group of 9 experienced breast pathologists collated a deidentified set of 60 breast cancer core biopsies from 3 laboratories, evaluated with the Ventana 4B5 HER2 assay and mostly scored locally as HER2 0 or 1+. Based on ASCO/CAP 2018 criteria and our extensive experience of reporting HER2 IHC, we specified scoring conventions for cancers with low levels of HER2 protein expression, articulating specific scoring pitfalls. Each pathologist then reviewed digitized whole slide images of the IHC slides and scored the HER2 expression for each case. At a subsequent consensus workshop, we reviewed the cases jointly to establish consensus scores for each case and determine the percentage of HER2 expressing tumor cells. Consensus was reached on all cases, with 40 classified as 1+ and 3 as 2+ (not amplified), totaling 43 (71.7%) HER2-low cancers. The remaining cases were HER2 0. In 93.3% of cases (56/60), the consensus score matched with the majority opinion of pathologists' independent scores. Seven (41.2%) of the 17 cases reported locally as HER2 0 were classified as HER2 low. Conversely, among 32 cases with local scores of 1+, 7 (21.8%) were reclassified as ultralow or null. Individual pathologists' accuracy in matching the consensus scores ranged from 73.3% to 91.67% (mean, 80.74%). Among HER2-low cancers those in which <20% of the tumor cells expressed HER2 had the lowest concordance levels. Observers Cohen's κ coefficients for concordance were excellent for 4, good in 1, and moderate in the 4 observers. This reference set of cases with expert consensus HER2 scores will be invaluable for peer training and development of our national external quality assurance program for HER2-low cancers. For assessing breast cancers at the low end of HER2 protein expression, our targeted scoring criteria and explicit instruction on pitfalls improved pathologists' accuracy and concordance., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. All rights reserved.)

Breast cancer (BC) with average human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) signals/cell ≥6 and HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) ratio <2 (in situ hybridization [ISH] group 3) is very rare, accounting for 0.4% to 3.0% of cases sent for the dual-probe ISH assay. Although such patients are currently eligible for treatment with HER2-targeted therapy, their characteristics and outcomes remain poorly understood. Sixty-two BCs with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemical score (2+) and reflex ISH group 3 results were identified across 4 institutions. Available clinicopathologic characteristics, MammaPrint and BluePrint molecular results, and follow-up information were retrospectively analyzed. Most BCs with HER2 equivocal immunohistochemical and ISH group 3 results were histologic grade 2 or 3 (100%), estrogen receptor (ER) positive (90.3%), with an average HER2 signals/cell of 7.3. Molecular profiles revealed that 80% (16/20) of tumors were luminal subtypes, and HER2 molecular subtype was identified in 10% of tumors (2/20). Twelve (19.4%) out of 62 patients developed local recurrence and/or distant metastasis with a median follow-up of 50 months. One (10%) of 10 patients achieved pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-nine (79%) out of 62 patients completed anti-HER2 agents, and exploratory analysis showed no statistically significant difference in disease outcomes between patients who completed anti-HER2 treatment and those who did not. Univariate analysis revealed advanced clinical stage, and ER/progesterone receptor negativity was associated with unfavorable disease outcomes, and exploratory multivariate analysis demonstrated that clinical stage was the most significant factor associated with disease outcomes in the studied population. These findings increase our understanding of this rare, but clinically important HER2 category. Large-scale prospective randomized studies are needed to further evaluate the role of perioperative HER2-targeted therapy in this patient population., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Accurate assessment of HER2 expression in tumor tissue is crucial for determining HER2-targeted treatment options. Nevertheless, pathologists' assessments of HER2 status are less objective than automated, computer-based evaluations. Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in HER2 interpretation. This study aimed to systematically evaluate current AI algorithms for HER2 immunohistochemical diagnosis, offering insights to guide the development of more adaptable algorithms in response to evolving HER2 assessment practices. A comprehensive data search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted using a combination of subject terms and free text. A total of 4994 computational pathology articles published from inception to September 2023 identifying HER2 expression in breast cancer were retrieved. After applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven studies were selected. These seven studies comprised 6867 HER2 identification tasks, with two studies employing the HER2-CONNECT algorithm, two using the CNN algorithm, one with the multi-class logistic regression algorithm, and two using the HER2 4B5 algorithm. AI's sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing HER2 0/1+ were 0.98 [0.92-0.99] and 0.92 [0.80-0.97] respectively. For distinguishing HER2 2+, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 [0.50-0.92] and 0.98 [0.93-0.99], respectively. For HER2 3+ distinction, AI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.99 [0.98-1.00] and specificity of 0.99 [0.97-1.00]. Furthermore, due to the lack of HER2-targeted therapies for HER2-negative patients in the past, pathologists may have neglected to distinguish between HER2 0 and 1+, leaving room for improvement in the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in this differentiation. AI excels in automating the assessment of HER2 immunohistochemistry, showing promising results despite slight variations in performance across different HER2 status. While incorporating AI algorithms into the pathology workflow for HER2 assessment poses challenges in standardization, application patterns, and ethical considerations, ongoing advancements suggest its potential as a widely effective tool for pathologists in clinical practice in the near future., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

We present herein an extension to our recently developed and published method termed "Fractionation of Nodal Cell Suspension" (FNCS). The method enables efficient subcellular fractionation into nuclear (N) and cytosolic (C) compartments of extremely fibrous and problematic metastatic axillary lymph node (mALN) tissue, using the entire nodule. For the purpose of the present study, a case of invasive lobular breast cancer (BC) patient with pT2N3aMx status and defined primary tumor markers (ERα 8, PR-B 8, and HER2 score 0) was available. Initially, the mALN tissue of this patient was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and a positive correlation of nodal ERα, PR-B and HER2 biomarkers to those of the primary tumor was obtained. Subsequently, the mALN was FNCS fractionated into N and C, and Western blot (WB) analysis demonstrated a single band for ERα, PR-B and nuclear loading control (HDAC1) in nuclear, but not in the cytosolic compartments, confirming the efficiency of our fractionation protocol. At the same time, HER2 bands were not observed in either compartment, in accordance with HER2 negativity determined by IHC in both primary tumor and mALN tissue. In conclusion, by confirming the nuclear expression of ERα and PR-B biomarkers in metastatic loci, we demonstrate the purity of the FNCS-generated compartments - the protocol that offers a reliable tool for further analysis of nuclear versus cytosolic content in downstream analysis of novel biomarkers in the whole mALN of BC patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: DESTINY B04 provided clinical meaning to a new classification of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression in breast cancer: HER2-low. Patients with germline breast cancer type 1 gene pathogenic variants (gBRCA1) often develop triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), but the proportion who could be classified as HER2-low and qualify for an additional targeted therapy option is unknown. This study aims to characterize the proportion of gBRCA1 or germline breast cancer type 2 gene pathogenic variants patients for whom these novel targeted therapies may be an option., Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with gBRCA1/2 treated at our institution for invasive breast cancer from 2000 to 2021. Synchronous or metachronous contralateral breast cancers were recorded separately. HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. We excluded patients without complete HER2 data., Results: Among the 95 breast cancers identified in our cohort of 85 gBRCA1/2 patients, 41 (43%) were TNBC, 38 (40%) were hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, and 16 (17%) were HER2-positive based on standard conventions. We found that 82% of the HR+/HER2-cancers and 66% of TNBCs would be reclassified as HER2-low. After stratifying by BRCA gene status, 64% of cancers in patients with gBRCA1 and 58% of cancers in patients with germline breast cancer type 2 gene pathogenic variants were HER2-low., Conclusions: A significant portion of gBRCA1/2 patients who were previously diagnosed with TNBC or HR+/HER2- breast cancer would now be classified as HER2-low and could be considered for the use of trastuzumab deruxtecan in the metastatic setting. Outcome differences from therapy changes in this cohort should now be assessed., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As an important prognostic indicator in breast cancer, human epithelial growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) is of importance for assessing prognosis of breast cancer patients, whose accurate and facile analysis are imperative in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Herein, photoactive Z-scheme UiO-66/CdIn 2 S 4 heterojunction was constructed by a hydrothermal method, whose optical property and photoactivity were critically investigated by a range of techniques, combined by elucidating the interfacial charge transfer mechanism. Meanwhile, PtPdCu nanoflowers (NFs) were fabricated by a simple aqueous wet-chemical method, whose peroxidase (POD)-mimicking catalytic activity was scrutinized by representative tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) oxidation in H 2 O 2 system. Taken together, the UiO-66/CdIn 2 S 4 based photoelectrochemical (PEC) aptasensor was established for quantitative analysis of HER-2, where the detection signals were further magnified through catalytic precipitation reaction towards 4-chloro-1-naphthol (4-CN) oxidation (assisted by the PtPdCu NFs nanozyme). The PEC aptasensor presented a broader linear range within 0.1 pg mL -1 -0.1 μg mL -1 and a lower limit of detection of 0.07 pg mL -1 . This work developed a new PEC aptasensor for ultrasensitive determination of HER-2, holding substantial promise for clinical diagnostics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER)-positive breast cancer (BC) is characterized by an aggressive clinical course. In the case of HER2 overexpression/amplification, patients benefit from HER2-targeting therapies. Standardized diagnostic HER2 assessment includes immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridization (ISH). The aim of this study was to compare this "gold standard" with the Droplet Digital™ polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), a method that allows sensitive and precise detection of copy number variations (CNV) in FFPE (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) DNA samples. Partitioning of the PCR reaction into 20,000 droplets enables a precise quantitative "CN" discrimination also in heterogeneous samples. FFPE breast cancer samples (n = 170) with routinely assessed HER2 status by IHC/ISH were retrospectively analyzed using the ddPCR CNV ERBB2 assay. Comparison of HER2 status assessment by the two methods revealed concordant results in 92.9% (158/170) of the cases. Discrepant cases were verified and interpreted. For ddPCR, a cut off value of 3 HER2 copies was set to distinguish between HER2-negative and HER2-positive BC. Results obtained with the ddPCR CNV ERBB2 assay were consistent and reproducible, and serial dilutions demonstrated a high stability and sensitivity of the method. The ddPCR CNV ERBB2 assay may be a specific and convenient tool to quantify HER2 copy numbers in BC samples. In our study, this method showed high reproducibility in accuracy of HER2 assessment compared to IHC/ISH analysis., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: HER2-targeted therapies have recently emerged as an option in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) overexpressing HER2. However, data regarding HER2 status in primary CRC and its corresponding liver metastases are limited, potentially influencing clinical decisions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the HER2 status in primary CRC and paired liver metastases., Methods: Patients with mCRC who were operated from their primary colorectal cancer and their corresponding synchronous or metachronous liver metastases, in the digestive surgery department of Besançon University Hospital, between April 1999 and October 2021, were included. Tissue microarrays were constructed from matched primary CRC and liver metastastic tissue samples. HER2 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization according to Valtorta's criteria., Results: A series of 108 paired primary CRC and liver metastases, including a series of multiple liver metastases originating from the same patients (n = 24), were assessed. Among the primary CRC, 89 (82.4%), 17 (15.8%) and 2 (1.8%) cases were scored 0, 1 + and 2 + respectively. In liver metastases, 99 (91.7%), 7 (6.5%) and 2 (1.8%) were scored 0, 1 + and 2, respectively. Overall, there was a 19% discrepancy rate in HER2 status between primary CRC and metastases, which increased to 21% in cases with multiple synchronous or metachronous liver metastases in a given patient. No significant difference was found between metachronous and synchronous metastases regarding the HER2 status (p = 0.237)., Conclusions: Our study highlights the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of HER2 status between primary CRC and corresponding liver metastases. These findings raise the question of a sequential evaluation of the HER2 status during disease progression, to provide the most suitable treatment strategy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Recent evidence brought by novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugates is leading to significant changes in HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) best practices. A new targetable category termed 'HER2-low' has been identified in tumors previously classified as 'HER2-negative'. Daily practice in pathology and medical oncology is expected to align to current recommendations, but patient access to novel anticancer drugs across geographies might be impeded due to local challenges., Materials and Methods: An expert meeting involving ten regional pathology and oncology opinion leaders experienced in BC management in four Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia) was held. Herein we summarized the current situation of HER2-low metastatic BC (mBC), local challenges, and action plans to prevent delays in patient access to testing and treatment based on expert opinion., Results: Gaps and differences at multiple levels were identified across the four countries. These included variability in the local HER2-low epidemiology data, certification of pathology laboratories and quality control, and reimbursement conditions of testing and anticancer drugs for HER2-negative mBC. While clinical decisions were aligned to international guidelines in use, optimal access to testing and innovative treatment was restricted due to significant delays in reimbursement or limitative reimbursement conditions., Conclusions: Preventing delays in HER2-low mBC patient access to diagnosis and novel treatments is crucial to optimize outcomes. Multidisciplinary joint efforts and pro-active discussions between clinicians and decision makers are needed to improve care of HER2-low mBC patients in CEE countries., (© 2024 Simona Borstnar et al., published by Sciendo.)