Search

– OBJECTIVE: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is an uncommon but frequently fatal complication following acute myocardial infarction. In medically treated patients, mortality rates exceed 90%, while the surgical repair is associated with better outcomes, even though optimal surgical timing is still under debate. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 78-years-old man with no previous remarkable cardiological history admitted to our Emergency Department with the diagnosis of anteri- or ST-elevation myocardial infarction and significant reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction. The emergency coronary angiography showed sub-occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery, treated with stent implantation. The post-procedural echocardiography unveiled the presence of an apical VSD with a large left-to-right shunt, significant right ventricular overload and dysfunction. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was positioned and, after Heart Team evaluation, a delayed surgical approach was planned. As a bridge to the intervention Levosimendan infusion was administered, on top of IABP support, and a significant improvement in bi-ventricular function and pressure profiles was obtained. Cardiac surgery was successfully performed 9 days after the admission without periprocedural complications. CONCLUSIONS: This unique case supports the use of Levosimendan as a valid pharmacological strategy for perioperative management of VSD.

Objective: Patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) present an acute microvascular dysfunction that leads to an impaired myocardial perfusion and, in more severe forms, an impaired epicardial flow. However, clinical relevance of a delayed coronary flow, the coronary slow flow (CSF), has never been investigated. We studied the prognostic value of CSF occurring in the acute phase of TTS. Methods: This cohort study prospectively evaluated patients with a diagnosis of TTS. CSF was defined as angiographically non-obstructive coronary arteries with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction-2 flow. The incidence of overall mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as the composite of TTS recurrence, cardiac rehospitalisation, cerebrovascular events and mortality, was assessed at follow-up. Results: We enrolled 101 patients (mean age 71.0±11.1 years, 86 (85.1%) female); CSF occurred in 18 (17.8%) patients. At admission, patients with CSF presented more frequently with Killip class III/IV, moderate-to-severe left ventricle systolic dysfunction and right ventricle dysfunction. During the index admission, patients with CSF had a higher rate of intrahospital complications (12 (66.7%) vs 28 (33.7%), p=0.01). At long-term follow-up, patients with CSF had a significantly higher occurrence of overall mortality (9 (50%) vs 19 (22.9%), p=0.011), mainly due to non-cardiac causes (89.3%), and a higher rate of MACE (10 (55.5%) vs 27 (32.5%), p=0.06). At multivariable Cox regression, CSF was independently associated with death from any causes. Conclusions: Patients with TTS presenting with CSF have a worse clinical presentation with a higher rate of intrahospital complications and a poor long-term clinical outcome.

extraordinary large CAF which, due to lack of appropriate correction at younger age, resulted in an “ab extrinseco” severe myocardial ischemia due to coronary compression.

Aims Stent implantation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients can be challenging and sometimes associated with immediate and long-term suboptimal results. Stent malapposition and strut uncoverage, predictors of stent thrombosis, are frequently detected in STEMI patients at medium/long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, data at a short follow-up are missing. We aimed to assess the extent of stent malapposition and struts coverage in the subacute phase of STEMI after stent implantation in primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods STEMI patients undergone primary or rescue PCI and scheduled for a second coronary angiography after 2-7 days were enrolled. During the second procedure, frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) was performed to assess percentage of malapposed struts (MS%), percentage area of malapposition (MA%), percentage of uncovered struts (US%), percentage area of atherothrombotic prolapse (PA%) and optical coherence tomography thrombus score (OCT-TS). Results Twenty patients were included and 21 stents (19 865 struts) were evaluated. Strut uncoverage was relatively limited [US% = 11.1 (8.1-13.6) %]. Stent malapposition was observed frequently, even if at low degree [MS% = 6.4 (3.3-13.3) %, MA% = 1.80 (0.46-2.76) %] as well as atherothrombotic prolapse [PA% = 0.09 (0.00-1.06) %]. Both MA% and PA% were significantly related to residual OCT-TS (R = -0.52, P = 0.02 and R = 0.71, P < 0.001, respectively), use of thrombolysis (P = 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively) and time elapsed from PCI to FD-OCT analysis (P = 0.001). Conclusion In the subacute phase after stenting in STEMI patients, strut uncoverage is relatively limited, while stent malapposition and atherothrombotic prolapse are common albeit limited features. Residual thrombus burden influences the degree of both stent malapposition and atherothrombotic prolapse.

Background: Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease (SIHD) is universally accepted, while in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) is less established. Aims of this retrospective study were: to compare in patients undergoing FFR assessment the prognostic impact of ACS vs SIHD, to evaluate the clinical relevance of the modality of utilization and timing of FFR assessment and to assess the different outcomes associated with an FFR> or ≤0.80. Methods: Major cardiac adverse events were assessed at a follow up of 16.4 ± 10.5 months in 543 patients with SIHD and 231 with ACS needing functional evaluation. FFR was used for lesions of ambiguous significance in the absence of a clear culprit vessel (first intention, FI) and for incidental lesions in the presence of a clear culprit vessel (second intention, SI). The decision to perform FFR and the identification of the stenosis needing functional assessment were left to the operator's discretion. Revascularization was performed when FFR was ≤0.80. Results: SIHD and ACS patients were not significantly different for principal clinical characteristics. ACS patients had significantly more events than SIHD, due to an excess of death and myocardial infarction. This was confirmed when FFR was used as FI, in particular if FFR was >0.80. On the contrary, when FFR was used as SI, event rates were similar between ACS and SIHD patients, regardless of FFR value. Conclusions: Our study shows that using FFR the risk of recurrent events in ACS is significantly higher than in SIHD. This different outcome is confined to those patients in whom FFR is utilized for lesions of ambiguous significance in the absence of a clear culprit vessel.

Background: Systemic inflammation is involved in several pathological cardiovascular processes. However, whether it plays a role in the no-reflow phenomenon occurring in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. Methods: We studies 60 consecutive patients (59.5 ± 12 years, 82% males) with a first ST-segment elevation AMI, treated by primary or rescue PCI within 6 h of symptom onset. Angiographic indexes of no-reflow, evaluated at the end of the procedure, included coronary TIMI flow grading, corrected TIMI frame count (c-TFC) and myocardial blush grade (MBG). ECG indexes of no-reflow included the lack of ST segment resolution (defined as a reduction < 50% of the measured ST-segment elevation at 90 min, compared to the admission ECG), as analyzed both in the single lead with the maximal ST elevation and in all leads showing ST elevation on admission. Patients were divided into two groups according to baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels measured on admission: high CRP group (CRP > 5 mg/L) and low CRP group (CRP < 5 mg/L). Results: A similar prevalence of final TIMI flow < 3 and MBG < 3 was observed in patients with high and low CRP serum levels (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.1, and 50% vs. 53%, p = 1.0, respectively), and c-TFC was also similar in the two groups (26 ± 4.5 vs. 24 ± 6, p = 0.5). Accordingly, the prevalence of lack of ST-segment resolution in the two groups was similar, both by the single-lead method (25% vs. 25%, p = 1.0) and the multiple-lead method (29% vs. 19%, p = 0.4). Conclusion: In this study we failed to demonstrate any significant association between CRP serum levels on admission and coronary no-reflow, as assessed by both angiographic and ECG parameters in AMI patients treated by successful primary or rescue PCI within 6 h of chest pain onset. © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.