Search

Adjuvant therapy; Breast cancer; Olaparib Terapia adyuvante; Cáncer de mama; Olaparib Teràpia adjuvant; Càncer de mama; Olaparib Background The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety. Patients and methods One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015. Results With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Δ 3.4%, 95% CI −0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Δ 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Δ 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion With 3.5 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDFS and DDFS with no new safety signals. Funding for this work, which was conducted as a collaborative partnership among the Breast International Group, NRG Oncology, Frontier Science, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, U.S.A. (MSD), was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers: U10CA 180868, UG1CA 189867, and U10CA 180822) and by AstraZeneca as part of an alliance between AstraZeneca and MSD. Provision of olaparib and placebo was from AstraZeneca.

PURPOSE: There is currently no standardised definition for patients at high risk of recurrence of HER2-negative early breast cancer (eBC, stages 1–3) after surgery. Recognising that the assessment of high risk is often multifactorial, the aim of this modified Delphi panel was to establish expert UK consensus on this definition, separately considering HR-positive and triple-negative (TN) patients. METHODS: A total of 45 UK-based clinicians, including breast cancer oncologists and surgeons, were invited to participate. The number of respondents in each of three rounds was 29, 24 and 22 respectively. Statements were developed using the results from a targeted literature review and the guidance of a lead clinician, and comprised free-text, single-choice or numerical formats. The first round aimed to determine which factors are currently used in clinical practice to assess risk of recurrence in the populations of interest. In the subsequent rounds, the objective was to establish thresholds indicative of high risk in a 10-year timeframe for each of the factors retained in Round 1. Between each round, statements were refined, considering the distribution of responses and free-text notes provided by participants. Consensus for single-choice questions was set at a pre-defined threshold of ≥70% of respondents. RESULTS: Consensus was achieved on the need to assess age, tumour size, tumour grade, number of positive nodes, presence of inflammatory breast cancer and one or more risk prediction tools to define high risk of recurrence in all HER2-negative patients. In HR-positive patients, there was agreement on the use of one or more tumour profiling tests and biomarkers to define high risk of recurrence. However, there was no consensus on biomarker use in TN patients, and support for specific biomarkers (such as Ki-67) was conflicting for both sub-populations based on the analysis of free-text notes. Similarly, while there was consensus on the use of pCR status/residual disease to indicate high risk in TN patients, this factor failed to reach consensus for the HR-positive sub-population. Germline BRCA status and menopausal status were not considered to be key factors for risk of recurrence in either biological subtype. In the second and third rounds, thresholds indicative of high recurrence risk were agreed; it should be noted that the free-text responses provided by the participants frequently highlighted that many of the factors should be considered along a continuous scale when assessing the risk of individual patients. In HR-positive patients, these thresholds included: age < 35 years, tumour size >5 cm (each when considered independently from other risk factors); tumour grade 3 (independently or in combination with other factors); number of positive lymph nodes ≥4 when considered independently or ≥1 in combination with other factors. For patients with TN tumours, the following thresholds reached consensus, whether considered independently or in combination with other factors: tumour size >2 cm, tumour grade 3, number of positive lymph nodes ≥1. In several cases, however, no consensus could be reached on the appropriate threshold indicating high risk of recurrence. In the HR-positive sub-population, these included thresholds for age and tumour size, when considered in combination with other factors. In the TN sub-population, this included age, whether independently or in combination with other factors. CONCLUSIONS: The expert consensus reached in this panel highlights that an integrated model is important in assessing recurrence risk in eBC and that definitions of high risk differ according to biological subtype. The results may serve as a valuable reference point for clinicians to use in assessing risk of disease recurrence and in making treatment decisions after surgery in the HER2-negative eBC population. FUNDING: AstraZeneca UK Ltd. Writing support: Costello Medical. Citation Format: Ellen R. Copson, Jean E. Abraham, Jeremy P. Braybrooke, Stuart A. McIntosh, Caroline O. Michie, Carlo Palmieri, Rebecca Roylance, Saiqa Spensley. Expert consensus on the definition of high risk of recurrence in HER2-negative early breast cancer: a modified Delphi panel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-39.

PDF file - 165K, Sweave document describing all statistical analysis performed in research.

PDF file - 65K

PDF 249K

Background: Chromosomal instability (CIN) is thought to be associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors; however, evidence from preclinical and mouse tumor models suggest that CIN may paradoxically enhance or impair cancer cell fitness. Breast cancer prognostic expression signature sets, which reflect tumor CIN status, efficiently delineate outcome in estrogen receptor ER-positive breast cancer in contrast to ER-negative breast cancer, suggesting that the relationship of CIN with prognosis differs in these two breast cancer subtypes.Methods: Direct assessment of CIN requires single-cell analysis methods, such as centromeric FISH, aimed at determining the variation around the modal number of two or more chromosomes within individual tumor nuclei. Here, we document the frequency of tumor CIN by dual centromeric FISH analysis in a retrospective primary breast cancer cohort of 246 patients with survival outcome.Results: There was increased CIN and clonal heterogeneity in ER-negative compared with ER-positive breast cancer. Consistent with a negative impact of CIN on cellular fitness, extreme CIN in ER-negative breast cancer was an independent variable associated with improved long-term survival in multivariate analysis. In contrast, a linear relationship of increasing CIN with poorer prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer was observed, using three independent measures of CIN.Conclusions: The paradoxical relationship between extreme CIN and cancer outcome in the ER-negative cohorts may explain why prognostic expression signatures, reflecting tumor CIN status, fail to predict outcome in this subgroup.Impact: Assessment of tumor CIN status may support risk stratification in ER-negative breast cancer and requires prospective validation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(10); 2183–94. ©2011 AACR.

PDF file - 106K

PDF file - 201K, Heatmap of centromeric distribution for ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients: Separate heatmaps for ER-negative and ER-positive cancers showing the centromeric distribution for chromosome 2 and 15 ranked according to MCD cohort, with corresponding HER2 status (center colourbar): HER2 negative (red) HER2 positive (black). The heatmap columns indicate the centromere number for each chromosome per nucleus and colours represent the percentage of nuclei having that particular centromere number (blue = 0%, red = 100%). For diagrammatic purposes the figure only portrays centromere counts between one and five.

PDF file - 106K, Association of Mean Centromeric Deviation Cohort with Breast cancer death for patients treated with chemotherapy: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of extreme aneuploid (MCD4) ER negative breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy compared to all other MCD groups together.

PDF file - 199K, Distribution of centromere signals for MCD1 and MCD4 ER-negative breast cancer patients: Histograms of centromere numbers for chromosome 15.

PDF file - 315K, Immunostaining of ASS1, TS, and DHFR in representative urothelial carcinomas.

PDF file - 408K, Pyrosequencing data of bladder cancer cell lines and primary bladder cancer samples.

PDF file - 177K, Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test for disease-specific and metastasis-free survival.

PDF file - 65K

PDF file - 198K, Table S1 Correlation between ASS1 expression and various clinicopathological factors. Table S2 Univariate log-rank analysis for disease-specific survival and metastasis-free survival. Table S3 Correlation between ASS1 IHC and pyrosequencing of primary bladder cases. Table S4 Combination index (CI) analysis.

PDF file - 802K, Metabolomics of ADI-PEG20 in a corroborative cell line panel (mesothelioma).

Background Abemaciclib is approved in 1st and 2nd line for hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, outcomes on this agent are unclear in the real world.We determined the safety and efficacy profile of abemaciclib across 15 institutions in the United Kingdom. Methods We retrospectively identified HR-positive, HER2-negative ABC patients who received abemaciclib between July 2018 and June 2020. Demographics, disease characteristics, prior treatments, blood tests, toxicities, treatment delays and responses were recorded. Simple statistics, Fisher’s exact test, chi-squared method and Cox regression were used as appropriate. Results 228 patients identified had median age of 64 (31-93). 172 (75.4%) were postmenopausal and 209 (91.7%) had ECOG Performance Status 0-1. 145 (63.6%) had visceral involvement and 44 (19.3%) only bone disease. Patients received a median 1 (range 0-7) prior lines of treatment and 0 (range 0-5) prior chemotherapy lines.148 patients (64.9%) experienced diarrhoea (grade ≥3 in 16 [7.0%]). 146 patients (64.0%) developed neutropenia (grade ≥3 in 40 [17.5%]). 5 experienced febrile neutropenia (2.2%). 32 patients (14.0%) required hospitalisation due to toxicity (diarrhoea in 9 [3.95%]).Dose reductions were required in 107 patients (46.9%), mainly due to diarrhoea (55 [24.1%]) and to 50mg BD in 30 patients (13.2%). Dose delays were in median 14 (range 2-118). Abemaciclib was discontinued in 121 patients (53.1%) due to disease progression in 61 (26.7%) and toxicity in 48 (21.0%) (diarrhoea in 16 [7.0%]).Abemaciclib produced clinical benefit rate of 82.8% and overall response rate of 47.2% in 163 patients assessed. Overall, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-7.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months (95% CI 7.6-10.6). Conclusions This a large real-world analysis of the safety and efficacy of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for advanced HR-positive breast cancer. In this analysis, the rates of diarrhoea were lower compared with the pivotal trial data, while neutropenia was more frequent. Although the PFS outcomes were similar to those previously reported, median OS was worse in this cohort which may reflect the different population of patients included, who were older and had more frequent visceral involvement. The selection of patients suitable for abemaciclib is crucial to ensure adequate efficacy and safety outcomes in this setting. Citation Format: Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti, Laura Morrison, Tamsin Nash, Nishanti Senthivel, Samantha Kestenbaum, Parvin Begum, Mariam Obeid, William Hayhurst, Dorothy Yang, Shafiah Gafoor, Caroline Brown, Farah Rehman, Laura Kenny, Olivia Hatcher, Susan Susan, Jennet Williams, Anna Brown, Hamoun Rozati, Alexandros Alexandros, Elinor Sawyer, Charalampos Gousis, Eleni Karapanagiotou, Anna Rigg, Kleopatra Rapti, Rebecca Roylance, Mark Beresford, Abigail L Gee, Apostolos Konstantis, Judy King, Mark Nathan, Emma Spurrell, Mark Pearce, Dane Bradwell, Arshi Denton, Kate Swain, Sophie McGrath, Mark Allen, Alistair Ring, Stephen Johnston, Fharat Raja. Abemaciclib and endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: A real-world UK multicentre experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-08.

Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) are a biologically diverse and aggressive subgroup lacking targeted therapy. Germline BRCA (gBRCA) breast cancer and TNBC share some phenotypic and molecular similarities, with 10%-20% of TNBC patients having gBRCA mutations. Homologous recombination deficient tumours are particularly sensitive to PARP inhibitors such as olaparib (Lynparza). It has been shown that adjuvant olaparib for patients with high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer and gBRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants after adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves 3-year invasive and distant disease-free survival compared to placebo (OlympiA). Aim: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for basal TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR) rate). Trial design: 3-stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin +/- olaparib, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen. Stage 1 and 2: Randomisation (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or one of two research arms with the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD for 12 days. Stage 3: Randomisation (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2. End-points: Stage 1: Safety; Stage 2: Schedule selection using pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib using a “pick-the-winner” design. Stage 3: pCR rate. This trial includes an optional pathway (PARTNERING) aiming to establish if the addition of new agents (ATR inhibitor and PDL1 inhibitor) can improve response in those patients with evidence of residual disease before surgery. Eligibility criteria: Aged 16-70; histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer; ER-negative, HER2-negative with TNBC basal phenotype or gBRCA positive, HER2-negative irrespective of hormone status; clinical stage T1-4 N0-2; performance status 0-1; treatment commenced within 6 weeks of diagnostic biopsy; biomarker scores: TILs, CK 5/6, EGFR +/- AR. Statistical methods: The recruitment of TNBC non-gBRCA and gBRCA patients is independent. Enrichment design is applied with an overall significance level 0.05(α) and 80% power. A minimum of 780 patients will be included to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients and the TNBC non-gBRCA cohort) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to platinum based chemotherapy. It is planned to recruit a minimum of 188 gBRCA patients. A maximum of 15 patients will be allocated into each PARTNERING cohort. Present accrual: Recruitment commenced 27 May 2016 and 678 patients from 30 sites have been accrued to date. The IDSMC reviewed the trial after Stages 1 and 2 and recommended to continue the trial without change. Data analysis for Stage 2 revealed no safety concerns and research arm 2 (olaparib on day 3 to day 14) was selected. Stage 3 Phase I recruitment is in progress (recruiting TNBC non-gBRCA and gBRCA patients) and we anticipate moving to Phase II (recruiting gBRCA patients only) by early 2022. Four patients have been accrued to the PARTNERING optional pathway to date. The trial is open and enrolling patients to UK and international sites. Contact information: partner@addenbrookes.nhs.uk Citation Format: Lynsey M Drewett, Karen A Pinilla, Louise Grybowicz, Jerome Wulff, Alimu Dayimu, Nikolaos Demiris, Jessica Martin, Camila Maida de Pontes, Nicola Johnson, Caron Harvey, Erdem Demir, Kimberley St John Green, James Jones, Gemma Young, Anne-Laure Vallier, Wendi Qian, Andrea Machin, Karen McAdam, Rebecca Roylance, Ellen R Copson, Anne Armstrong, Nicola Levitt, Elena Provenzano, Marc Tischkowitz, Emma McMurtry, Helena Earl, Jean E Abraham. PARTNER: Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-24-01.

BackgroundNeutrophils kill antibody-opsonized tumor cells using trogocytosis, a unique mechanism of destruction of the target plasma. This previously unknown cytotoxic process of neutrophils is dependent on antibody opsonization, Fcγ receptors and CD11b/CD18 integrins. Here, we demonstrate that tumor cells can escape neutrophil-mediated cytotoxicity by calcium (Ca2+)-dependent and exocyst complex-dependent plasma membrane repair.MethodsWe knocked down EXOC7 or EXOC4, two exocyst components, to evaluate their involvement in tumor cell membrane repair after neutrophil-induced trogocytosis. We used live cell microscopy and flow cytometry for visualization of the host and tumor cell interaction and tumor cell membrane repair. Last, we reported the mRNA levels of exocyst in breast cancer tumors in correlation to the response in trastuzumab-treated patients.ResultsWe found that tumor cells can evade neutrophil antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) by Ca2+-dependent cell membrane repair, a process induced upon neutrophil trogocytosis. Absence of exocyst components EXOC7 or EXOC4 rendered tumor cells vulnerable to neutrophil-mediated ADCC (but not natural killer cell-mediated killing), while neutrophil trogocytosis remained unaltered. Finally, mRNA levels of exocyst components in trastuzumab-treated patients were inversely correlated to complete response to therapy.ConclusionsOur results support that neutrophil attack towards antibody-opsonized cancer cells by trogocytosis induces an active repair process by the exocyst complex in vitro. Our findings provide insight to the possible contribution of neutrophils in current antibody therapies and the tolerance mechanism of tumor cells and support further studies for potential use of the exocyst components as clinical biomarkers.

In DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) and DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated unprecedented activity in patients (pts) with HER2+ (immunohistochemistry 3+; immunohistochemistry 2+/in situ hybridization+) advanced metastatic breast cancer (mBC), leading to regulatory approvals in several countries for HER2+ unresectable/mBC after a prior anti–HER2-based regimen. DESTINY-Breast02 (NCT03523585) is a phase 3 trial of T-DXd vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). It acts as a confirmatory study for the pivotal phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial. Here we report the primary results of DESTINY-Breast02. Methods: Pts with HER2+ mBC were randomized 2:1 to receive T-DXd or TPC (trastuzumab + capecitabine or lapatinib + capecitabine) and stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status (HR+/HR-), prior pertuzumab treatment, and history of visceral disease. The primary endpoint of this time-driven primary analysis was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR). The powered secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by BICR, duration of response (DoR) by BICR, PFS by investigator assessment, safety, and others. Results: 608 pts were randomized to receive T-DXd (n = 406) or TPC (n = 202). Pts receiving T-DXd and TPC had a median age of 54.2 years (range, 22.4-88.5 years) and 54.7 years (range, 24.7-86.5 years), respectively, with a median of 2 (range, 0-10 and range,1-8) prior lines of systemic therapy (excluding hormone therapy) in the metastatic setting. Median treatment duration was 11.3 mo in the T-DXd arm and ~4.5 mo in the TPC arm. Efficacy and safety results are shown in the table below. T-DXd significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.28-0.45; P Conclusions: Results from DESTINY-Breast02 confirmed the clinical benefit and superiority of T-DXd over conventional chemotherapy-based regimens in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with T-DM1, as evidenced by significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS and OS. These data, together with earlier reported results from the DESTINY-Breast03 study of T-DXd vs T-DM1 solidify T-DXd as an optimal treatment option in pts with progressive HER2+ mBC across broad settings. Editorial Acknowledgment Under guidance of the authors, assistance in medical writing and editorial support was provided by Caylin Bosch, PhD, of ApotheCom, and was funded by Daiichi Sankyo. Funding This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca. Table. Summary of Efficacy and Safety Results for T-DXd and TPC in Patients With HER2+ mBC Previously Treated With T-DM1 Citation Format: Ian Krop, Yeon H. Park, Sung-Bae Kim, Giuliano Borges, Sercan Aksoy, Joaquin Gavila Gregori, Rebecca Roylance, Elgene Lim, Rinat Yerushalmi, Flora Zagouri, Francois P. Duhoux, Tanja Fehm, Toshimi Takano, Anton Egorov, Iris Wu, Jillian Cathcart, Changan Chu, Fabrice Andre. GS2-01 Trastuzumab deruxtecan vs physician’s choice in patients with HER2+ unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine: primary results of the randomized, phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast02 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-01.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of hormone-positive metastatic breast cancers (mBCs). They are currently established as standard therapies in combination with endocrine therapy as first- and second-line systemic treatment options for both endocrine-sensitive and endocrine-resistant mBC populations. In the first-line metastatic setting, the median progression-free survival for the three currently approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, with aromatase inhibitors is greater than 2 years (palbociclib 27.6 months; ribociclib 25.3 months; and abemaciclib 28.18 months). Although CDK4/6 inhibitors have significant clinical benefits and enable physicians to delay starting chemotherapy, they are expensive and can be associated with drug toxicities. Here, we have performed a systemic review of the reported molecular markers predictive of drug response including intrinsic and acquired resistance for CDK4/6 inhibition in mBC. The rapidly emerging molecular landscape is captured through next-generation sequencing of breast cancers (DNA with or without RNA), liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA), and protein analyses. Individual molecular candidates with robust and reliable evidence are discussed in more depth.

Aims/hypothesis Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is independently associated with silent myocardial ischaemia, major cardiovascular events, myocardial dysfunction and cardiovascular mortality. Several studies have highlighted the increased prevalence of CAN in prediabetes (impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glucose). Considering the exponential rise of prediabetes, we aimed to determine the prevalence of CAN through a systematic literature review. Methods This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019125447). An electronic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Published full text, English language articles that provide CAN prevalence data of studies in individuals with prediabetes and aged over 18 years were included. Prevalence data for normal glucose tolerance and diabetes were also extracted from the selected articles, if present. All articles were screened by two independent reviewers using a priori criteria. Methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using a critical appraisal tool. Results Database searches found 4500 articles; subsequently, 199 full text articles were screened, 11 of which fulfilled the inclusion criteria (4431 total participants, 1730 people with prediabetes, 1999 people with normal glucose tolerance [NGT] and 702 people with predominantly type 2 diabetes). Six of the selected studies reported definite CAN prevalence data (9–39%). Only a single large population-based study by Ziegler et al (KORA S4 study, 1332 participants) determined definite CAN based on two or more positive autonomic function tests (AFTs), with a mean prevalence of 9% in all prediabetes groups (isolated impaired glucose tolerance 5.9%; isolated impaired fasting glucose 8.1%; impaired fasting glucose plus impaired glucose tolerance 11.4%), which was higher than NGT (4.5%). This study is most likely to provide a reliable population-specific estimate of CAN in prediabetes. There was a higher than expected prevalence of CAN in prediabetes (9–38%) when compared with normal glucose tolerance (0–18%) within the same studies (n = 8). There was a wide prevalence of possible CAN based on one positive AFT (n = 5). There was heterogeneity between the studies with variations in the definition of CAN, methodology and characteristics of the populations, which likely contributed to the diversity of prevalence estimates. The overall risk of bias was low. Conclusions/interpretation There is a higher than expected prevalence of CAN in prediabetes. Early detection of CAN in prediabetes through population screening needs careful consideration in view of the excess morbidity and mortality risk associated with this condition.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy.METHODS: We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182634; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804.FINDINGS: Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96–99% (n=800, kappa 0·89–0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83–98) overall and 98% (87–100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0–23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9–49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6–48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3–17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1–33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were raised gamma-glutamyltransferase (13 [16%] of 80 patients; cohort A); diarrhoea (four [25%] of 20; cohort B); fatigue (four [22%] of 18; cohort C); and rash (five [26%] of 19; cohort D). 17 serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients, and there was one treatment-related death caused by grade 4 dyspnoea (in cohort C).INTERPRETATION: ctDNA testing offers accurate, rapid genotyping that enables the selection of mutation-directed therapies for patients with breast cancer, with sufficient clinical validity for adoption into routine clinical practice. Our results demonstrate clinically relevant activity of targeted therapies against rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, confirming these mutations could be targetable for breast cancer treatment.FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, and Puma Biotechnology.

Background: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing may provide a more current assessment of the genetic profile of advanced breast cancer (BC) compared with analysis of the primary tumour, with repeat advanced disease biopsy conducted infrequently in routine clinical practice. The plasmaMATCH trial was designed to assess the clinical utility of using ctDNA testing to select patients for targeted therapies. Methods: The plasmaMATCH trial was an open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort platform trial, consisting of ctDNA testing in ~1000 patients with advanced BC, with patients recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts with therapies matched to mutations identified in ctDNA (A: ESR1 mutation - extended-dose fulvestrant 500mg every 2 weeks, B: HER2 mutation - neratinib +/- fulvestrant (standard dosing), C: AKT1 in ER positive BC -capivasertib + fulvestrant (standard dosing), D: AKT1 in ER negative BC or PTEN inactivating mutation - capivasertib). A fifth cohort (E) recruited patients with triple negative BC with no actionable mutation to receive olaparib + AZD6738, and will be reported separately. Each cohort had a specific phase II single arm design. ctDNA testing was conducted with two technologies: digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) at a central laboratory prospectively in all patients, and error corrected sequencing with Guardant360 prospectively from part-way through recruitment and retrospectively for the remaining patients. Tumour sequencing from an advanced disease biopsy was conducted retrospectively, not influencing cohort entry. The primary endpoint for Cohorts A-D is confirmed objective response rate by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, safety and frequency of mutations identified in ctDNA screening. Results: Entry into ctDNA testing for Cohorts A-D was closed on 26/Apr/2019 with 1044 patients registered. ctDNA screening results were received for 1033 patients (99%), with 142 patients entered into Cohorts A-D (A 84, B 21, C 18, D 19). Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and sequencing results was high (individual gene level agreement 95.5%-99.4%, kappa 0.89-0.93). Predefined efficacy criteria were met in Cohorts B (neratinib for HER2 mutations) and C (capivasertib for AKT mutations), with exploratory analysis of Cohort D identifying activity of capivasertib in AKT1 mutations (Table 1). Efficacy criteria were not met in Cohort A (extended-dose fulvestrant for ESR1 mutations). Adverse events were consistent with prior reports, with extended-dose fulvestrant well tolerated. Table 1: Efficacy results from plasmaMATCHMutationCohortConfirmed response rate, % (95%CI; n/N)Median PFS (IQR), monthsAll patientsFirst 16 evaluable patients*ESR1A8.1% (3.0-16.8; 6/74)-2.2 (1.7-5.3)HER2B25.0% (8.7-49.1; 5/20)25.0% (7.3-52.4; 4/16)5.4 (3.4-9.1)AKT1C22.2% (6.4-47.6; 4/18)18.8% (4.0-45.6; 3/16)10.2 (3.2-18.2)AKT basketD10.5% (1.3-33.1; 2/19)12.5% (1.6-38.3; 2/16)3.4 (1.8-5.5)AKT133.3% (4.3-77.7; 2/6)--PTEN0 % (0/13)--*Predefined cohort efficacy thresholds for response were set: 13/78 (A); 3/16 (B, C, D) Conclusion: Circulating tumour DNA testing offers accurate tumour genotyping, sufficient for routine clinical practice. This approach can be used to identify patients with rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, who have clinically relevant response rates with matched targeted therapies. Citation Format: Nicholas Turner, Belinda Kingston, Lucy Kilburn, Sarah Kernaghan, Andrew M Wardley, Iain Macpherson, Richard D Baird, Rebecca Roylance, Peter Stephens, Olga Oikonomidou, Jeremy P Braybrooke, Mark Tuthill, Jacinta Abraham, Matthew C Winter, Hannah Bye, Michael Hubank, Claire Snowdon, Daniel Rea, David Cameron, Abeer Shaaban, Katrina Randle, Katie Wilkinson, Laura Moretti, Judith M Bliss, Alistair Ring, on behalf of the plasmaMATCH Trial Management Group. Results from the plasmaMATCH trial: A multiple parallel cohort, multi-centre clinical trial of circulating tumour DNA testing to direct targeted therapies in patients with advanced breast cancer (CRUK/15/010) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-06.

Background: Ribociclib, an oral, selective inhibitor of CDK4/6 (CDK4/6i), is approved for use in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC in multiple countries, including the UK, based on three phase III registration studies (MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7). Ribociclib plus ET demonstrated significantly improved PFS in all the phase III studies compared with placebo plus ET and significantly increased OS in the 1st line study of premenopausal women (MONALEESA-7). Here we report interim safety and efficacy results from the UK cohort of CompLEEment-1, a phase 3b trial evaluating RIBO+LET in an expanded patient (pt) population. Methods: Pts with HR+, HER2- ABC, ≤1 line of prior chemotherapy (CT), and no prior ET for ABC received RIBO+LET. Treatment regimens and study endpoints have been reported previously (De Laurentiis, et al. ASCO 2018. Poster 1056). Results: Out of the 3,246 patients recruited globally, 139 patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment at UK sites, were evaluated. At the cut-off date (August 8, 2018), 83 patients (59.3%) were still receiving treatment, with adverse events (20.9%) and progressive disease (12.9%) the most common reasons for discontinuation. Demographic and baseline characteristics indicated a diverse population including premenopausal women (9.4%), patients aged ≥70 years (25.2%) and ECOG ≥1 (35.9%; 1[34.5%], 2 [1.4%]). The median age of the participants was 62 yrs (range 34-86). De novo ABC was the most recent diagnosis in 18.7% of patients, 10.1% had DFI ≤24 months and 70.5% had DFI >24 months. Visceral disease was present in 59.7% of patients, 24.5% had bone-only metastases, 2.9% had CNS metastases and the proportion of patients with ≥3 metastatic sites was 41.8%. The most common adverse events (all grades) were neutropenia (66.2%), nausea (59.0%) and fatigue (51.1%). AEs of special interest (AESI) and their clinical impact are shown in table 1. The only non-hematologic any-cause grade ≥3 AEs ≥5% were increased ALT (11.5%) and AST (7.2%). There were no on study deaths in the UK cohort. The overall response rate was 22.3% (95% CI: 15.7%, 30.1%) and clinical benefit rate was 71.2% (95% CI: 62.9%, 78.6%). Conclusions: This interim analysis provides safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ribociclib in combination with letrozole in UK pts with HR+, HER2- ABC who had not previously received ET for ABC. Safety results and response rates were consistent with those observed in the international phase III registration studies. NCT02941926. Table 1. Clinical impact of AESI, n (%)NeutropeniaALT increasedAST increasedQTcF prolongationAll grade92 (66.2)29 (20.9)24 (17.3)10 (7.2)Grade 3/469 (49.6)16 (11.5)10 (7.2)1 (0.7)Leading to dose interruption63 (45.3)13 (9.4)14 (10.1)3 (2.2)Leading to dose reduction21 (15.1)1 (0.7)0 (0)2 (1.4)Leading to dose withdrawal0 (0)13 (19.4)6 (4.3)0 (0)Leading to hospitalization4 (2.9)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0) Citation Format: Alistair Ring, Timothy Crook, Mark Tuthill, Rebecca Roylance, Trevor McGoldrick, Stephen Chan, Helen Lo'Monte, William Roberts. Phase IIIb CompLEEment-1 study of ribociclib plus letrozole in the treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC): Interim results from the UK cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-17.

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is found in the plasma of over 90% of patients with advanced breast cancer (BC). ctDNA analysis can establish the current genomic profile of an individual’s cancer and identify potentially targetable mutations. The genomic landscape of advanced BC and clinical associations has yet to be fully defined. This analysis describes the genomic landscape of ctDNA in patients screened for the UK plasmaMATCH study. Methods: The plasmaMATCH trial was an open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort platform trial, consisting of ctDNA testing in ~1000 patients with advanced BC. The trial consists of parallel treatment cohorts (Cohorts A-E) with therapies matched to mutations identified in ctDNA testing. The genomic landscape of ctDNA in advanced BC was prospectively analysed for hotspot PIK3CA,AKT1, HER2 and ESR1 mutations using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR, Bio-Rad), and using an error-corrected 73-gene targeted panel (Guardant360, Guardant Health) prospectively from part-way through the trial, and retrospectively for the remaining patients. Results: Entry into ctDNA testing for Cohorts A-D was closed on 26/Apr/2019, at which time 1044 patients had been registered and 1025 tested with ddPCR. 800 patients had targeted panel ctDNA sequencing (364 prospective, 436 retrospective) (Table 1). Targeted sequencing identified a somatic alteration in 92.9% of patients (743/800). The most frequent mutations were TP53 (44.1%), PIK3CA (34.9%), ESR1 (33.1%), GATA3 (11.0%) and ARID1A (7.8%). ESR1 (33.1%) and KRAS (4.1%) alterations occurred at higher frequency in ctDNA compared to a metastatic tissue sequencing series (q Genomic AlterationddPCR*Targeted Panel**All % n = 1025HR+ HER2-% n = 658HR+ HER2+ % n = 62HR- HER2+ % n = 36TNBC % n = 172All % n = 800HR+ HER2- % n = 515HR+ HER2+ % n = 48HR- HER2+ % n = 26TNBC % n = 136PIK3CA mutation25.829.933.919.49.334.939.041.734.614.7ESR1 mutation27.737.819.40033.143.522.900.7AKT1 mutation4.24.01.604.75.05.22.104.4ERBB2 mutation2.73.208.31.26.46.612.515.42.2PTEN mutationNANANANANA6.98.54.23.84.4ERBB2 amplificationNANANANANA5.81.931.357.71.5MSI highNANANANANA1.10.42.101.5* Phenotype data based on 928 patients with known phenotype tested by ddPCR for targetable hotspot mutations.** Phenotype data based on 725 patients with known phenotype sequenced by targeted panel. All pathogenic mutations are shown, including mutations not tested by ddPCR. Citation Format: Belinda Kingston, Hannah Bye, Michael Hubank, Giselle Walsh, Claire Swift, Matthew Beaney, Lucy Kilburn, Sarah Kernaghan, Andrew M Wardley, Iain Macpherson, Richard D Baird, Rebecca Roylance, Katie Wilkinson, Isaac Garcia-Murillas, Judith M Bliss, Nicholas Turner, Alistair Ring, on behalf of the plasmaMATCH Trial Management Group. The genomic landscape of breast cancer based on ctDNA analysis: Data from the plasmaMATCH trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-07.

Background: Activation of the AKT pathway can result from diverse rare genetic events, including mutation of AKT1, AKT2/3 E17K, and through inactivating mutation or homozygous deletion of PTEN. AKT1 mutations and genetic loss of PTEN are associated with activation of AKT signalling and selective sensitivity to AKT inhibition in pre-clinical models. Capivasertib is a potent catalytic inhibitor of AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3 with activity both in vivo and in the clinic. The plasmaMATCH trial assessed the efficacy of capivasertib in BC patients with rare AKT activating mutations. Methods: The plasmaMATCH trial is an open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort platform trial, consisting of ctDNA testing in ~1000 patients with advanced BC. Patients with AKT1 mutations in ER negative BC; or AKT2/3 E17K mutations, PIK3R1 or PTEN inactivating mutations orhomozygous deletion of PTEN in both ER positive and ER negative BC were recruited. Mutations were identified in ctDNA testing in plasmaMATCH or in prior tumour sequencing. Patients were treated with capivasertib 480mg BID 4 days on - 3 days off. The primary endpoint for Cohort D is confirmed objective response rate as defined by RECIST v1.1. Using a single stage A’Hern design with a target response rate of 25%, unacceptable response rate of 5%, alpha=5% and power=80%, at least 3 responses out of 16 evaluable patients were required to infer efficacy for capivasertib. Results: In total 19 patients were recruited in Cohort D, 12 following ctDNA testing and 7 on tumour testing. Fifteen (79%) were ER positive, all were HER2 non-amplified, and 14 (74%) had visceral metastases. Mutations were AKT1 E17K (5 patients), AKT1 L52R (1), PTEN inactivating mutation (12), and PTEN homozygous deletion (1). All patients were evaluable with overall confirmed response rate of 10.5% (95%CI 1.3-33.1%, 2/19) (first 16 evaluable patients: 2/16, 12.5% (95%CI 1.6-38.3)). Two further patients had unconfirmed responses. Median progression free survival was 3.4 months (IQR 1.8-5.5 months) and median duration of response 3.9 months (IQR 3.7-4.2 months) with 1 patient continuing treatment. In patients with AKT1 mutations there was a 33% response rate (2/6) with 2 further unconfirmed responses. There were no responses in patients with PTEN mutations (0/13). The most common clinically significant grade 3 or 4 adverse events were rash (26%), hypertension (11%), transaminase increase (11%) and vomiting (11%). Conclusions: Capivasertib monotherapy did not meet pre-specified criteria for efficacy in this group of patients with a range of AKT pathway activating mutations. In exploratory analysis, capivasertib was active in patients with AKT1 mutations. Citation Format: Richard D Baird, Lucy Kilburn, Sarah Kernaghan, Andrew M Wardley, Iain Macpherson, Rebecca Roylance, Peter Stephens, Olga Oikonomidou, Jeremy P Braybrooke, Mark Tuthill, Jacinta Abraham, Matthew C Winter, Belinda Kingston, Katie Wilkinson, Nicholas Turner, Alistair Ring, Judith M Bliss, on behalf of the plasmaMATCH Trial Management Group. Results from plasmaMATCH trial treatment cohort D: A phase II trial of capivasertib in patients with an AKT activation basket mutation identified via ctDNA testing or tumour sequencing (CRUK/15/010) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-14.

Background: HER2 mutations occur in approximately 3% of HER2 non-amplified cancers and include missense substitutions and indels within the tyrosine kinase domain resulting in oncogenic HER2 activation. Neratinib, an irreversible EGFR, HER2 and ERBB4 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in pre-clinical HER2 mutant models, and in a prior phase I trial with HER2 mutations identified through tumour testing. The plasmaMATCH trial Cohort B assessed the efficacy of neratinib in BC patients with a HER2 mutation identified in ctDNA testing. Methods: The plasmaMATCH trial was an open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort platform trial, consisting of ctDNA testing in ~1000 patients with advanced BC. Patients with a HER2 mutation identified via ctDNA testing were registered to Cohort B. Patients were treated with 240mg neratinib once daily. Patients with ER positive BC were also treated with fulvestrant 500mg intramuscularly on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15, and Cycle 2 onwards every 28 days. The primary endpoint for Cohort B was confirmed objective response rate as defined by RECIST v1.1. Using a single stage A’Hern design with a target response rate of 25%, unacceptable response rate of 5%, alpha=5% and power=80%, at least 3 responses out of 16 evaluable patients were required to infer efficacy. Results: Following ctDNA testing, 21 patients enrolled in Cohort B (58% of patients with HER2 mutations identified in ctDNA testing). Eighteen (86%) were ER positive, 2 (10%) were HER2 amplified, and 18 (86%) had visceral metastases. The most common HER2 mutations detected in baseline plasma were L755S (47.6%), V777L (19%), and S310F (14.3%). In the 20 evaluable patients, confirmed response rate was 25.0% (95%CI 8.7-49.1%, 5/20) (first 16 evaluable patients: 4/16, 25.0% (95%CI 7.3-52.4)). One patient had a complete response, ongoing at 29 months duration, and three additional patients had unconfirmed partial responses. Median progression free survival was 5.4 months (IQR 3.4-9.1) and median duration of response was 5.7 months (IQR 3.7-9.7 months) with 3 patients continuing on treatment. The most common clinically significant grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhoea (20%) and hypertension (15%). Conclusions: Neratinib, with or without fulvestrant, was active in advanced BC patients with HER2 mutations identified in ctDNA testing, meeting the pre-specified threshold for efficacy. Citation Format: Andrew M Wardley, Lucy Kilburn, Sarah Kernaghan, Iain Macpherson, Richard D Baird, Rebecca Roylance, Peter Stephens, Olga Oikonomidou, Jeremy P Braybrooke, Mark Tuthill, Jacinta Abraham, Matthew C Winter, Belinda Kingston, Katie Wilkinson, Judith M Bliss, Alistair Ring, Nicholas Turner, on behalf of the plasmaMATCH Trial Management Group. Results from plasmaMATCH trial treatment cohort B: A phase II trial of neratinib plus fulvestrant in ER positive breast cancer or neratinib alone in ER negative breast cancer in patients with a HER2 mutation identified via ctDNA screening (CRUK/15/010) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-07.

Background: AKT1 mutation occurs in approximately 3% of breast cancer (BC), enriched in advanced BC. The AKT1 E17K mutation results in constitutive activation of AKT1, associated with sensitivity to AKT inhibitor capivasertib in pre-clinical models, and in a prior phase I trial with AKT1 mutations identified through tumour testing. The plasmaMATCH trial Cohort C assessed the efficacy of capivasertib and fulvestrant in ER positive BC patients with an AKT1 mutation in ctDNA testing. Methods: The plasmaMATCH trial was an open-label, multi-centre, multi-cohort platform trial, consisting of ctDNA testing in ~1000 patients with advanced BC. Patients with an AKT1 mutation identified via ctDNA testing were registered to Cohort C. Patients were treated with capivasertib 400mg BID 4 days on - 3 days off, plus fulvestrant 500mg intramuscularly on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15, and Cycle 2 onwards every 28 days. The primary endpoint for Cohort C was confirmed objective response rate as defined by RECIST v1.1. Using a single stage A’Hern design with a target response rate of 25%, unacceptable response rate of 5%, alpha=5% and power=80%, at least 3 responses out of 16 evaluable patients were required to infer efficacy. Results: Following ctDNA testing, 18 patients enrolled in Cohort C (42% of patients with AKT1 mutations identified in ctDNA testing). All were ER positive, 1 (5.6%) was HER2 amplified, and 17 (94%) had visceral metastases. Mutation was AKT1 E17K in 17 patients and AKT1 L52R in 1 patient. All patients were evaluable with a confirmed response rate of 22.2% (95%CI 6.4-47.6%, 4/18) (first 16 evaluable patients: 3/16, 18.8% (95%CI 4.0-45.6)). A further 4 patients had an unconfirmed partial response. Median progression free survival was 10.2 months (IQR 3.2-18.2 months) and the median duration of response was 7.5 months (IQR 4.1-9.8 months) with 4 patients continuing on treatment. The most common clinically significant grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue (22%), rash (17%), diarrhoea (11%) and hyperglycaemia (11%). Conclusions: Capivasertib plus fulvestrant was active in patients with ER positive breast cancer and AKT1 mutations identified in ctDNA testing, meeting the pre-specified threshold for efficacy Citation Format: Rebecca Roylance, Lucy Kilburn, Sarah Kernaghan, Andrew M Wardley, Iain Macpherson, Richard D Baird, Peter Stephens, Olga Oikonomidou, Jeremy P Braybrooke, Mark Tuthill, Jacinta Abraham, Matthew C Winter, Belinda Kingston, Katie Wilkinson, Alistair Ring, Judith M Bliss, Nicholas Turner, on behalf of the plasmaMATCH Trial Management Group. Results from plasmaMATCH trial treatment cohort C: A phase II trial of capivasertib plus fulvestrant in ER positive breast cancer patients with an AKT1 mutation identified via ctDNA screening (CRUK/15/010) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-11.

Background: oestrogen receptor positive/ human epidermal growth factor receptor positive (ER+/HER2+) breast cancers (BCs) are less responsive to endocrine therapy than ER+/HER2- tumours. Mechanisms underpinning the differential behaviour of ER+HER2+ tumours are poorly characterised. Our aim was to identify biomarkers of response to 2 weeks’ presurgical AI treatment in ER+/HER2+ BCs. Methods: all available ER+/HER2+ BC baseline tumours (n=342) in the POETIC trial were gene expression profiled using BC360™ (NanoString) covering intrinsic subtypes and 46 key biological signatures. Early response to AI was assessed by changes in Ki67 expression and residual Ki67 at 2 weeks (Ki67 2wk). Time-To-Recurrence (TTR) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox models adjusted for standard clinicopathological variables. New molecular subgroups (MS) were identified using consensus clustering. Findings: HER2-enriched (HER2-E) subtype BCs (44.7% of the total) showed poorer Ki67 response and higher Ki67 2wk (p2wk. Five new MS that were associated with differential response to AI were identified. HER2-E had significantly poorer TTR compared to Luminal BCs (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.14–5.69; p=0.0222). The new MS were independent predictors of TTR, adding significant value beyond intrinsic subtypes. Interpretation: our results show HER2-E as a standardised biomarker associated with poor response to AI and worse outcome in ER+/HER2+. HRD, TP53 mutational score and immune-tumour tolerance are predictive biomarkers for poor response to AI. Lastly, novel MS identify additional non-HER2-E tumours not responding to AI with an increased risk of relapse. Funding: Cancer Research UK (CRUK/07/015).

ImportanceAccurate identification of patient groups with the lowest level of protection following COVID-19 vaccination is important to better target resources and interventions for the most vulnerable populations. It is not known whether SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing has clinical utility for high-risk groups, such as people with cancer.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether spike protein antibody vaccine response (COV-S) following COVID-19 vaccination is associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection or hospitalization among patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a population-based cross-sectional study of patients with cancer from the UK as part of the National COVID Cancer Antibody Survey. Adults with a known or reported cancer diagnosis who had completed their primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule were included. This analysis ran from September 1, 2021, to March 4, 2022, a period covering the expansion of the UK’s third-dose vaccination booster program.InterventionsAnti–SARS-CoV-2 COV-S antibody test (Elecsys; Roche).Main Outcomes and MeasuresOdds of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and COVID-19 hospitalization.ResultsThe evaluation comprised 4249 antibody test results from 3555 patients with cancer and 294 230 test results from 225 272 individuals in the noncancer population. The overall cohort of 228 827 individuals (patients with cancer and the noncancer population) comprised 298 479 antibody tests. The median age of the cohort was in the age band of 40 and 49 years and included 182 741 test results (61.22%) from women and 115 737 (38.78%) from men. There were 279 721 tests (93.72%) taken by individuals identifying as White or White British. Patients with cancer were more likely to have undetectable anti-S antibody responses than the general population (199 of 4249 test results [4.68%] vs 376 of 294 230 [0.13%]; P P P Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that COV-S antibody testing allows the identification of patients with cancer who have the lowest level of antibody-derived protection from COVID-19. This study supports larger evaluations of SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to patients with cancer should be prioritized to minimize impact on cancer treatments and maximize quality of life for individuals with cancer during the ongoing pandemic.

Simple Summary Cancer patients may have increased risk from COVID-19 due to impaired fitness and immunosuppression secondary to underlying cancer and the effects of anti-cancer treatments. We previously demonstrated that solid cancer and anti-cancer treatments may be associated with increased death following COVID-19 in an analysis of patients treated in our London hospital during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (March to May 2020). The United Kingdom experienced a second peak of COVID-19 hospitalizations during December 2020 to February 2021. We aimed to compare the outcomes between patients with solid cancer presenting to our hospital during the first and second peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic and to determine if cancer and anti-cancer treatments were still risk factors for death. We found lower overall deaths in our hospital during the second peak. Metastatic cancer and anti-cancer treatments were risk factors for worse outcomes following COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Abstract An increased mortality risk was observed in patients with cancer during the first wave of COVID-19. Here, we describe determinants of mortality in patients with solid cancer comparing the first and second waves of COVID-19. A retrospective analysis encompassing two waves of COVID-19 (March–May 2020; December 2020–February 2021) was performed. 207 patients with cancer were matched to 452 patients without cancer. Patient demographics and oncological variables such as cancer subtype, staging and anti-cancer treatment were evaluated for association with COVID-19 mortality. Overall mortality was lower in wave two compared to wave one, HR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30–0.56). In patients with cancer, mortality was 43.6% in wave one and 15.9% in wave two. In hospitalized patients, after adjusting for age, ethnicity and co-morbidities, a history of cancer was associated with increased mortality in wave one but not wave two. In summary, the second UK wave of COVID-19 is associated with lower mortality in hospitalized patients. A history of solid cancer was not associated with increased mortality despite the dominance of the more transmissible B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 variant. In both waves, metastatic disease and systemic anti-cancer treatment appeared to be independent risk factors for death within the combined cancer cohort.

Background: Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) accounts for approximately 15% of invasive breast carcinomas and is commonly associated with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Both have been shown to have higher familial risks than the more common ductal cancers. However, there are little data on the prevalence of the known high and moderate penetrance breast cancer predisposition genes in ILC. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of germline variants in CDH1, BRCA2, BRCA1, CHEK2, PALB2, and TP53 in sporadic ILC and LCIS diagnosed in women ages ≤60 years. Methods: Access Array technology (Fluidigm) was used to amplify all exons of CDH1, BRCA2, BRCA1, TP53, CHEK2, and PALB2 using a custom-made targeted sequencing panel in 1,434 cases of ILC and 368 cases of pure LCIS together with 1,611 controls. Results: Case–control analysis revealed an excess of pathogenic variants in BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, and CDH1 in women with ILC. CHEK2 was the only gene that showed an association with pure LCIS [OR = 9.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.42–28.66, P = 1.4 × 10−5] with a larger effect size seen in LCIS compared with ILC (OR = 4.31; 95% CI, 1.61–11.58, P = 1.7 × 10−3). Conclusions: Eleven percent of patients with ILC ages ≤40 years carried germline variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes. Impact: Women with ILC ages ≤40 years should be offered genetic screening using a panel of genes that includes BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, and CDH1.

Background Palbociclib is approved in 1st line for hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). A Compassionate Access Program (CAP) previously allowed patients to receive it in 4th line. However, Palbociclib has not been specifically tested in this population. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy profile of Palbociclib within the CAP across ten institutions in the United Kingdom. Methods We retrospectively identified HR-positive HER2-negative ABC patients on the Palbociclib CAP between December 2015 and September 2017. Demographics, disease characteristics, prior treatments, blood tests, toxicities, treatment delays and responses were recorded. Simple statistics, Fisher's exact test, chi-squared method and Cox regression were used as appropriate. Results 118 patients identified had median age of 59 (32-82). 97 (82.20%) were postmenopausal and 109 (92.37%) had ECOG Performance Status 0-1. 96 (81.36%) had visceral involvement, 19 (16.10%) bony only and 15 (12.71%) visceral only disease. Patients received a median 5 (range 3-11) prior lines of treatment and 3 (range 0-8) prior chemotherapy lines. 105 patients (89.74%) developed neutropenia (grade ≥3 in 59 [56.19%]). 6 experienced febrile neutropenia (5.13%). 57 (48.72%) had a dose reduction, down to 100mg in 48 (41.03%) and 75mg in 9 (7.69%) due to hematologic toxicity in 46 (80.70%). Dose delays were in median 7 days long (range: 0-56). Palbociclib was discontinued due to disease progression in 97 (82.91%) and to toxicity in 5 (4.27%). Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 45 patients (67.16%) who received ≥3 and in 22 (32.84%) who received Palbociclib produced clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 47.52% and overall response rate of 15.84% in 101 patients assessed. CBR was 45.45% with previous endocrine treatment (ET) progression-free survival (PFS) Overall, median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.7-5.9). The PFS seen in different subgroups showed no impact in relation to the number of lines of prior chemotherapy ( Median OS was 15.8 months (95% CI 13.3-18.7) for the whole cohort and it was greater in patients who derived longer PFS from prior ET (≥6 months: 18.1 months [95% CI 13.0-NR]; Conclusions To date, this is the most extensive analysis of Palbociclib outcomes in ≥4th-line setting. In this heavily pretreated population clinical benefit was confirmed particularly for endocrine-sensitive disease and predominantly involving the bones and in earlier lines of treatment. Grade ≥3 neutropenia rates were similar to PALOMA trials, but the higher incidence of febrile neutropenia need to be carefully considered. Citation Format: Battisti NML, Kingston B, King J, Denton A, Waters S, Sita-Lumsden A, Rehman F, Stavraka C, Kristeleit H, Sawyer E, Houghton D, Davidson N, Howell S, Choy J, Harper P, Roylance R, Fharat R, Mohammed K, Ring A, Johnston S. Palbociclib and endocrine therapy in fourth line and beyond for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: The UK compassionate access program experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-23.

Palbociclib is approved in 1st line for hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). A Compassionate Access Programme previously allowed patients to receive it in 4th line. However, Palbociclib has not been specifically tested in this population. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy profile of Palbociclib within the Programme across ten institutions in the United Kingdom. We retrospectively identified HR-positive HER2-negative ABC patients on the Programme between December 2015 and September 2017. Demographics, disease characteristics, prior treatments, blood tests, toxicities, treatment delays and responses were recorded. Simple statistics, Fisher’s exact test, χ2 method and Cox regression were used. 118 patients identified had a median age of 59. 82.2% were postmenopausal and 92.4% performance status 0–1. 81.4% had visceral involvement and 6.8% bone-only disease after a median of 5 prior treatments and 3 prior chemotherapies. Clinical benefit rate was 47.5%, overall response rate 15.8%, median PFS 4.5 months and median OS 15.8 months. Longer progression-free survival on prior endocrine therapy was a predictor of longer PFS and OS. 89.7% developed neutropenia (grade ≥ 3 in 56.8%). 5.1% experienced febrile neutropenia. 48.3% had dose reductions and 3.4% discontinued Palbociclib following toxicity. No statistically significant difference in grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was observed according to metastatic sites nor previous treatments. This is the most extensive analysis of palbociclib in ≥ 4th-line setting. Clinical benefit was confirmed particularly for endocrine-sensitive, predominantly bony disease and in earlier lines of treatment. Safety was similar to PALOMA trials with higher febrile neutropenia rate.