Search

Abstract Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with insulin resistance and progressive dysfunction of β-pancreatic cells, leading to persistent hyperglycemia. Macrophages play a crucial role in this context, influencing both the development and progression of insulin resistance. These innate immune cells respond to inflammatory stimuli and reprogram their metabolism, directly impacting the pathophysiology of T2D. Macrophages are highly plastic and can adopt either pro-inflammatory or pro-resolutive phenotypic profiles. In T2D, pro-inflammatory macrophages, which rely on glycolysis, exacerbate insulin resistance through increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide. In contrast, pro-resolutive macrophages, which prioritize fatty acid metabolism, have different effects on glucose homeostasis. Metaflammation, a chronic low-grade inflammation, is induced by pro-inflammatory macrophages and significantly contributes to the progression of T2D, creating an environment conducive to metabolic dysfunction. This review aims to clarify the contribution of macrophages to the progression of T2D by detailing how their inflammatory responses and metabolic reprogramming influence insulin resistance and the disease’s pathophysiology. The review seeks to deepen the understanding of the biochemical and metabolic mechanisms involved, offering broader insights into the impact on the quality of life for millions of patients worldwide.

Abstract Despite all efforts to combat the pandemic of COVID-19, we are still living with high numbers of infected persons, an overburdened health care system, and the lack of an effective and definitive treatment. Understanding the pathophysiology of the disease is crucial for the development of new technologies and therapies for the best clinical management of patients. Since the manipulation of the whole virus requires a structure with an adequate level of biosafety, the development of alternative technologies, such as the synthesis of peptides from viral proteins, is a possible solution to circumvent this problem. In addition, the use and validation of animal models is of extreme importance to screen new drugs and to compress the organism's response to the disease. Peptides derived from recombinant S protein from SARS-CoV-2 were synthesized and validated by in silico, in vitro and in vivo methodologies. Macrophages and neutrophils were challenged with the peptides and the production of inflammatory mediators and activation profile were evaluated. These peptides were also inoculated into the swim bladder of transgenic zebrafish larvae at 6 days post fertilization (dpf) to mimic the inflammatory process triggered by the virus, which was evaluated by confocal microscopy. In addition, toxicity and oxidative stress assays were also developed. In silico and molecular dynamics assays revealed that the peptides bind to the ACE2 receptor stably and interact with receptors and adhesion molecules, such as MHC and TCR, from humans and zebrafish. Macrophages stimulated with one of the peptides showed increased production of NO, TNF-α and CXCL2. Inoculation of the peptides in zebrafish larvae triggered an inflammatory process marked by macrophage recruitment and increased mortality, as well as histopathological changes, similarly to what is observed in individuals with COVID-19. The use of peptides is a valuable alternative for the study of host immune response in the context of COVID-19. The use of zebrafish as an animal model also proved to be appropriate and effective in evaluating the inflammatory process, comparable to humans.

The zebrafish is an animal model of increasing use in many biomedical fields of study, including toxicology, inflammation, and tissue regeneration. In this paper, we have investigated the inflammatory effects of Loxosceles intermedia’s venom (LIV) on zebrafish, as well as the effects of Maresin 2 (Mar2) and Resolvin D5 (RvD5), two specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), in the context of tissue regeneration after fin fold amputation. Furthermore, increasing concentrations of LIV (250–2000 ng) were assayed for their haemolytic effects in vitro, and, afterwards, the same concentrations were evaluated in vivo, when injected intraperitoneally. LIV caused haemolysis in human red blood cells (RBCs), but not in zebrafish RBCs. The survival curve was also not altered by LIV injection, regardless of venom dosage. Histological analysis of renal and hepatic tissues, as well as the whole animal, revealed no pathological differences between LIV-injected and PBS-injected groups. Fin fold regeneration was not altered between LIV-injected and control groups, nor in the presence of MaR2 and RvD5. Results of swimming behavioral analysis also did not differ between groups. Moreover, in silico data indicated differences between human and zebrafish cell membrane lipid constitutions, such as in phospholipases D preferred substrates, that could lead to the protection of zebrafish against LIV. Although our data implies that zebrafish cannot be used as a toxicological model for LIV studies, the absence of observed toxicological effects paves the way for the comprehension of the venom’s mechanism of action in mammals and the fundamental evolutionary processes involved.