Search

Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins bind and inactive bacterial endotoxin in vitro and prevent death when given before a lethal dose of endotoxin in animals. However, lipoproteins have not yet been demonstrated to improve survival in polymicrobial gram-negative sepsis. We therefore tested the ability of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to prevent death after cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in rats. Animals were given bolus infusions of either chylomicrons (1 g triglyceride/kg per 4 h) or an equal volume of saline for 28 h after CLP. Chylomicron infusions significantly improved survival (measured at 96 h) compared with saline controls (80 vs 27%, P < or = 0.03). Chylomicron infusions also reduced serum levels of endotoxin, measured 90 min (26 +/- 3 vs 136 +/- 51 pg/ml, mean +/- SEM, P < or = 0.03) and 6 h (121 +/- 54 vs 1,026 +/- 459 pg/ml, P < or = 0.05) after CLP. The reduction in serum endotoxin correlated with a reduction in serum tumor necrosis factor, measured 6 h after CLP (0 +/- 0 vs 58 +/- 24 pg/ml, P < or = 0.03), suggesting that chylomicrons improve survival in this model by limiting macrophage exposure to endotoxin and thereby reducing secretion of inflammatory cytokines. Infusions of a synthetic triglyceride-rich lipid emulsion (Intralipid; KabiVitrum, Inc., Alameda, CA) (1 g triglyceride/kg) also significantly improved survival compared with saline controls (71 vs 27%, P < or = 0.03). These data demonstrate that triglyceride-rich lipoproteins can protect animals from lethal polymicrobial gram-negative sepsis.

Background: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a method for avoiding conversion to laparotomy in patients considered for laparoscopic colectomy. Patients deemed to be at high risk for conversion to laparotomy were initially approached via an 8-cm midline incision ("peek port") with the laparoscopic equipment unopened. If intraperitoneal conditions were favorable, the procedure was performed using hand-assisted laparoscopy. If intraperitoneal conditions were unfavorable, the incision was extended to a formal laparotomy. Patients deemed to be at low risk for conversion to laparotomy were approached laparoscopically from the outset.Methods: Data from 241 consecutive patients brought to the operating room for intended laparoscopic colectomy were retrieved from a prospective database.Results: The study population consisted of 132 men and 109 women with a mean age of 62 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28. Prior abdominal surgery had been performed in 49% of these patients. Inflammatory conditions accounted for 38% of the diagnoses, and enteric fistulas were present in 7% of the cases. Of the 25 patients who underwent the initial "peek port," 8 (32%) underwent immediate incision extension to formal laparotomy. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy was performed in 17 (68%) of these 25 patients, with one subsequent conversion to formal laparotomy. Of the 216 patients initially approached laparoscopically, 5 (2%) required conversion to laparotomy. The laparotomy rate for the "peek port" group (9/25, 36%) was higher than for the initial laparoscopy group (5/216, 2%) (p < 0.0001). Of the 233 patients from both groups who underwent laparoscopy, the overall rate for conversion to laparotomy was 3% (6/233).Conclusions: The "peek port" approach to the patient with a potentially hostile abdomen allows for rapid assessment of intraperitoneal conditions and is associated with an overall low rate of conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy. This technique should reduce overall cost by avoiding the use of laparoscopic equipment as well as potential complications related to trocar placement and laparoscopic dissection in patients who will ultimately require formal laparotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spurred by mounting evidence that the detection and treatment of early-stage colorectal cancers and adenomatous polyps can reduce mortality, Medicare and some other payors recently authorized reimbursement for colorectal cancer screening in persons at average risk for this malignancy. A collaborative group of experts convened by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research has recommended screening for average-risk persons over the age of 50 years using one of the following techniques: fecal occult blood testing each year, flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years, fecal occult blood testing every year combined with flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years, double-contrast barium enema every five to 10 years or colonoscopy every 10 years. Screening of persons with risk factors should begin at an earlier age, depending on the family history of colorectal cancer or polyps. These recommendations augment the colorectal cancer screening guidelines of the American Academy of Family physicians. Recent advances in genetic research have made it possible to identify persons at high risk for colorectal cancer because of an inherited predisposition to develop this malignancy. These patients require aggressive screening, usually by lower endoscopy performed at an early age. In some patients, genetic testing can guide screening and may be cost-effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Benign multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (BMPM) is a rare condition, in which patients have multiple cystic lesions of the peritoneum. BMPM can mimic mucinous carcinomatosis and can thus create a diagnostic dilemma. We present the case of a 76-year-old woman who was referred for management of ascending colon adenocarcinoma and was noted to have several nonspecific cystic lesions in the abdomen and pelvis on preoperative computed tomography and diagnostic laparoscopy. Frozen section analysis suggested the lesions contained 'mucin'. Due to concern for metastases, right colectomy was aborted. Final histologic analysis of the laparoscopic biopsies revealed mesothelial cysts, consistent with BMPM, unrelated to her colon adenocarcinoma. Laparoscopic right colectomy was performed 2 weeks later. BMPM can create diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty in patients with known visceral malignancies when discovered incidentally. Frozen section analysis may not be accurate in differentiating the two, and final histologic confirmation should be sought prior to definitive treatment., Competing Interests: Authors have no conflicts of interests or disclosures to report., (Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. © The Author(s) 2024.)

Background: Sarcopenia is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing operations for malignancy, but its influence on patients undergoing elective colectomy for diverticulitis is unknown. We hypothesized that sarcopenia is associated with adverse perioperative events in patients undergoing elective colectomy for diverticulitis., Methods: Comorbidities, operative characteristics, and postoperative complications were extrapolated from our institutional EMR in patients undergoing elective colectomy for diverticulitis from 2016 to 2020. Sarcopenia was calculated using perioperative imaging and defined by standard skeletal muscle index (SMI) and psoas muscle index (PMI) thresholds. Univariate analysis was used to compare sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients., Results: 148 patients met inclusion criteria. Using SMI thresholds, 95 patients (64%) were sarcopenic. With SMI criteria, sarcopenic patients were older (67 vs 52 years old; P < .01) and had lower BMIs (26.2 vs 34.0, respectively; P < .001) than non-sarcopenic patients. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, postoperative complications, and non-home discharge between groups ( P > .05 for all). Postoperative length of stay was greater in sarcopenic patients (3 IQR 2-5 vs 2 IQR 2-3 days; P < .01). Using PMI thresholds, 68 (46%) met criteria for sarcopenia. Using PMI thresholds, sarcopenic patients were older (68 vs 57.5 years old; P < .01) and had lower BMIs (25.8 vs 32.8; P < .01). There were no differences in comorbidities or measured operative outcomes between groups ( P > .05 for all), other than postoperative length of stay which was longer in the sarcopenic group (3.5 IQR 3-5 vs 2 IQR 2-3; P < .01)., Conclusions: Incidence of sarcopenia was high in patients undergoing elective colectomy for diverticulitis in our practice, but sarcopenia was not associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. In select patients, elective colectomy for diverticulitis can be safely performed in the presence of sarcopenia., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: In the United States, 37% of all opioids are prescribed in the surgical setting, many of which report initial exposure in the postoperative period., Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of a narcotic-sparing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on postoperative narcotic use by patients and to assess its impact on the narcotic-prescribing practices of physicians., Design: Data regarding consecutive narcotic-naïve patients who underwent a surgical procedure from January 2013 to August 2017 were retrospectively reviewed., Settings: Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: preimplementation (2013-2015) and postimplementation (2015-2017) of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol., Patients: This study included patients who underwent elective inpatient abdominal colorectal surgery at the University of Florida Health., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative narcotic use (inpatient and outpatient). Other outcomes measured included pain scores, time to diet institution, length of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, and postoperative complications., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the preprotocol group (n = 537) and postprotocol group (n = 790). Protocol implementation was associated with a decrease in the total 30-day postoperative narcotic amount used by patients (2481 vs 31 morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.05), inpatient patient-controlled analgesia use (63% vs 0.5%; p < 0.00001; dosage 1254 vs 5 morphine milligram equivalents), inpatient on-demand oral narcotic use (90% vs 32%; p = 0.001; dosage 47 vs 5 morphine milligram equivalents), and outpatient narcotic amount used (46 vs 6 morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.001). Average pain scores were similar., Limitations: Retrospective nature of the study and possible underestimation of pre- and postoperative narcotic use., Conclusions: Implementation of a narcotic-sparing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol was associated with a decrease in both inpatient and 30-day outpatient postoperative narcotic use. Variation in resident physician prescribing practices suggests the need for ongoing education to accompany these protocols. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B936 ., El Impacto De Un Protocolo De Recuperacin Mejorado Con Ahorro De Narcticos En El Uso Postoperatorio De Narcticos Despus De Una Colectoma: ANTECEDENTES:En los Estados Unidos, el 37 % de todos los opioides se prescriben en el entorno quirúrgico. Entre los adictos a los narcóticos, muchos reportan una exposición inicial en el período posoperatorio.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el impacto de un protocolo de recuperación mejorada después de la cirugía que ahorra narcóticos en el uso de narcóticos postoperatorios por parte de los pacientes y evaluar su impacto en las prácticas de prescripción de narcóticos de los médicos.DISEÑO:Se revisaron retrospectivamente los datos de pacientes consecutivos sin tratamiento previo con narcóticos que se sometieron a un procedimiento quirúrgico colorrectal abdominal electivo para pacientes hospitalizados desde enero de 2013 hasta agosto de 2017.AJUSTE:Los pacientes se dividieron en 2 cohortes: antes de la implementación (2013-2015) y después de la implementación (2015-2017) del protocolo de recuperación mejorada después de la cirugía.PACIENTES:Pacientes de cirugía colorrectal abdominal electiva para pacientes internados en University of Florida Health.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:La medida de resultado primaria fue el uso de narcóticos postoperatorios de 30 días (pacientes hospitalizados y ambulatorios). Otros resultados medidos incluyeron puntuaciones de dolor, tiempo hasta la institución de la dieta, duración de la estancia hospitalaria, costo de la hospitalización y complicaciones postoperatorias.RESULTADOS:Las características iniciales fueron similares entre los grupos antes (n = 537) y después del protocolo (n = 790). La implementación del protocolo se asoció con una disminución en la cantidad total de narcóticos postoperatorios de 30 días utilizada por los pacientes (2481 mg frente a 31 mg de equivalentes de morfina, p = 0,05), uso de analgesia controlada por pacientes hospitalizados (63 % frente a 0,5 %, p < 0,00001; dosis 1254 mg frente a 5 mg), uso de narcóticos orales a demanda en pacientes hospitalizados (90 % frente a 32 %, p = 0,001; dosis de 47 mg frente a 5 mg) y cantidad de narcóticos utilizados en pacientes ambulatorios (46 mg frente a 6 mg, p = 0,001). Las puntuaciones medias de dolor fueron similares.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio y la posible sub estimación del uso de narcóticos antes y después de la operación fueron limitaciones de los hallazgos del estudio.CONCLUSIÓN:La implementación de un protocolo de recuperación mejorada después de la cirugía que ahorra narcóticos se asoció con una disminución en el uso de narcóticos en el postoperatorio de pacientes hospitalizados y ambulatorios de 30 días. La variación en las prácticas de prescripción de los médicos residentes sugiere la necesidad de una educación continua que acompañe a estos protocolos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B936 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2022.)

Background: Smoking has been shown to negatively affect surgical outcomes, so smoking cessation prior to elective operations is often recommended. However, the effects of smoking status on inguinal hernia repair outcomes have not been extensively studied. Hence, we investigated the association between smoking status and short-term adverse outcomes following inguinal hernia repair., Methods: Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was queried for elective, clean inguinal hernia repairs, excluding those with concomitant procedures or where length of stay > 30 days. The resulting cohort was divided into three groups: current smokers, former smokers, and never smokers. Baseline patient, hernia, operative characteristics, and 30-day outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between smoking status and overall and wound complications., Results: 19,866 inguinal hernia repairs were included (current smokers = 2239, former smokers = 4064 and never smokers = 13,563). Current smokers and former smokers, compared to never smokers, had slightly higher unadjusted rates of overall complication rates (9% and 9% versus 7%, p = 0.003) and surgical site occurrences/infection (6% and 6% versus 4%, p < 0.001). However, on multivariable analysis, compared to current smokers, neither the rates of overall complications nor surgical site occurrences were significantly different in former smokers (OR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.76, 1.13] and OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.73, 1.17]) and never smokers (OR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.83, 1.18] and OR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.70,1.06]) respectively., Conclusions: Smoking status is not associated with short-term adverse outcomes following inguinal hernia repair. Mandating smoking cessation does not appear necessary to prevent short-term adverse outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Different approaches and mesh positions are used for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (MIS-VHR). Our aim was to evaluate the trends and short-term outcomes of intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM), preperitoneal, and retromuscular repairs for small ventral hernias., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). We included elective MIS-VHR in adults with hernia defect width < = 6 cm from 2012 to 2021. We compared patient/hernia characteristics, trends, and short-term outcomes between IPOM, preperitoneal, and retromuscular repairs. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics., Results: A total of 7261 patients were included (IPOM = 4484, preperitoneal = 1829, retromuscular = 948). Preperitoneal repair was associated with lower rates of incisional (preperitoneal = 37%, IPOM = 63%, retromuscular = 73%) and recurrent hernias (preperitoneal = 11%, IPOM = 21%, retromuscular = 22%) compared to IPOM and retromuscular. Median defect width was 3.0, 2.0, and 4.0 cm for IPOM, preperitoneal, and retromuscular, respectively. There has been a progressive increase in the proportion of preperitoneal and retromuscular repairs over time (10% in 2013-53% in 2021 of all MIS-VHR). Robotic approach was more frequently utilized in preperitoneal and retromuscular (both > 85%) compared to IPOM (47%). Transversus abdominis release was performed in 14% of retromuscular repairs. After IPTW, no clinically significant differences were noted in the short-term outcomes between IPOM versus preperitoneal. Retromuscular repairs were associated with higher risk of 30-day reoperation (OR = 3.54, 95%CI [1.67, 7.5] and OR = 5.29, 95%CI [1.23, 22.74]) compared to IPOM and preperitoneal repairs, respectively, and higher risk of 30-day readmission compared to preperitoneal repairs (OR = 2.6, 95%CI [2.6, 6.4])., Conclusion: Based on ACHQC data, preperitoneal and retromuscular approaches for MIS-VHR of small hernias have increased over time and are primarily performed robotically. Transversus abdominis release was performed in 14% of retromuscular repairs of these small hernias. Retromuscular repairs were associated with higher 30-day readmission and reoperation rates compared to the other approaches., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Elevated preoperative glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is believed to predict complications in diabetic patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). Our objective was to assess the association between HbA1c and outcomes of VHR in diabetic patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database. We included adult diabetic patients who underwent elective VHR with an available HbA1c result. The patients were divided into two groups (HbA1c < 8% and HbA1c ≥ 8%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, hernia characteristics, operative details, and surgical outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of complications was performed. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess probability of composite recurrence at different HbA1c levels., Results: 2167 patients met the inclusion criteria (HbA1c < 8% = 1,776 and HbA1c ≥ 8% = 391). Median age was 61 years and median body mass index was 34 kg/m 2 . 75% had an American Society of Anesthesiology class of 3. The median HbA1c was 6.5% in the HbA1c < 8% group versus 8.7% in the HbA1c ≥ 8% group. 73% were incisional hernias, 34% were recurrent, and median hernia width was 6 cm. Open approach was used in 63% and myofascial release was performed in 46%. Median follow-up was 27 days. There were no clinically significant differences in the rates of overall 30-day complications, wound complications, reoperation, readmission, mortality, length of stay and quality of life and pain scores between the two groups. Regression analyses did not identify an association between HbA1c and the rates of complications, surgical site infection or composite recurrence across the spectrum of HbA1c values., Conclusion: Our study finds no evidence of an association between HbA1c and operative outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing elective VHR., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: Dr L.M.F. received effort support from the American College of Surgeons George H. A. Clowes, Jr., MD, FACS, Memorial Research Career Development Award. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

Introduction: There are a paucity of data regarding the safety of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy (APT/ACT). We aim to compare the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic (LIHR) vs. open repair of inguinal hernias (OIHR) in patients on APT/ACT., Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Vizient Clinical DataBase. We included adults receiving APT/ACT who underwent outpatient, elective, and primary inguinal hernia repair between 2017 and 2019. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients receiving aspirin, non-aspirin antiplatelet, and anticoagulant therapy. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess both the effect of APT/ACT on the probability of receiving LIHR vs OIHR and their respective outcomes., Result: A total of 142,052 repairs were included, of which 21,441 (15%) were performed on patients receiving APT/ACT. Mean age was 69 years (± 10.5) and 93% were male. 19% of hernias were bilateral. 40% of operations were performed at teaching hospitals. On multivariable analysis, patients on non-aspirin antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy were more likely to receive an open procedure (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.2; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) [1.1, 1.4] and OR = 1.4; CI [1.3, 1.5], respectively). LIHR was associated with a lower rate of length of stay > 1 day (OR = 0.65; CI [0.5, 0.9]). Rates of 30-day postoperative hematoma, transfusions, stroke, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, readmission, and emergency department visits were similar between the two operative approaches., Conclusion: Patients on APT/ACT represent a substantial proportion of those undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Non-aspirin antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy are independent predictors of choosing an open repair. Laparoscopic repair appears to be safe in patients receiving APT/ACT under current perioperative management patterns., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Patients with coagulopathy requiring emergent appendectomy constitute a challenging patient population. It is unclear whether laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is as safe as open appendectomy (OA) in these patients., Methods: We queried the ACS-NSQIP database for adults with coagulopathy undergoing emergent appendectomy from 2014 to 2017. Demographic characteristics and operative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Propensity weighting for LA versus OA was estimated using augmented inverse probability of treatment weights (AIPW)., Results: A total of 137,429 patients were included, of which 7049 (5%) had coagulopathy. In patients with coagulopathy, LA was the most common approach (89%). After AIPW, there was no difference in the adjusted risk of either postoperative transfusion or 30-day reoperation between OA and LA. LA was associated with reduced operative time (56 versus 75 min), length of stay (3.5 versus 7.0 d), and surgical site infection rate (6% versus 13%) compared to OA., Conclusions: Patients with coagulopathy represent a significant proportion of those undergoing an appendectomy. The majority of patients with coagulopathy who require appendectomy undergo LA, and this approach appears to be safe with regard to transfusion requirement and reoperation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lessons Learned: Treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically involves multiple lines of therapy with eventual development of treatment resistance. In this single-arm, phase II study involving heavily pretreated patients, the combination of sorafenib and capecitabine yielded a clinically meaningful progression-free survival of 6.2 months with an acceptable toxicity profile. This oral doublet therapy is worthy of continued investigation for clinical use in patients with mCRC., Background: Capecitabine (Cape) is an oral prodrug of the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil. Sorafenib (Sor) inhibits multiple signaling pathways involved in angiogenesis and tumor proliferation. SorCape has been previously studied in metastatic breast cancer., Methods: This single-arm, phase II study was designed to evaluate the activity of SorCape in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients received Sor (200 mg p.o. b.i.d. max daily) and Cape (1,000 mg/m 2 p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14) on a 21-day treatment cycle. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with preplanned comparison with historical controls., Results: Forty-two patients were treated for a median number of 3.5 cycles (range 1-39). Median PFS was 6.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-7.9) months, and overall survival (OS) was 8.8 (95% CI, 4.3-12.2) months. One patient (2.4%) had partial response (PR), and 22 patients (52.4%) had stable disease (SD) for a clinical benefit rate of 54.8% (95% CI, 38.7%-70.2%). Hand-foot syndrome was the most common adverse event seen in 36 patients (85.7%) and was grade ≥ 3 in 16 patients (38.1%). One patient (2.4%) had a grade 4 sepsis, and one patient (2.4%) died while on treatment., Conclusion: SorCape in this heavily pretreated population yielded a reasonable PFS with manageable but notable toxicity. The combination should be investigated further., (© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary are the property of the authors.)

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of a method to avoid conversion to laparotomy in patients considered for laparoscopic colectomy. Patients considered being at high risk for conversion to formal laparotomy were initially approached via a small midline incision ("peek port") with the laparoscopic equipment readily available but unopened. If intraperitoneal conditions were favorable, the procedure was performed using hand-assisted laparoscopy (HALS); if intraperitoneal conditions were unfavorable, the incision was extended to a formal laparotomy., Methods: Data from 664 patients from a single surgeon brought to the operating room with the intention of proceeding with laparoscopic colectomy (either via straight laparoscopy or HALS) were retrieved from a prospective database. Comparison of conversion rates between groups was performed using χ 2 analysis., Results: The study population consisted of 361 men and 303 women with a mean age of 61 years. Inflammatory conditions accounted for 40% of the diagnoses and enteric fistulas were present in 12%. Of the 79 patients who underwent initial "peek port" exploration, 38 (48%) underwent immediate extension to formal laparotomy, whereas 41 (52%) underwent HALS colectomy, with one subsequent conversion from HALS to formal laparotomy. Of the 585 patients initially approached laparoscopically, 14 (2%) required conversion to laparotomy. Of the 626 patients from both groups who underwent laparoscopy, the overall conversion to laparotomy rate was 15/626 (2%)., Discussion: The "peek port" approach to the patients with a potentially hostile abdomen allows for prompt assessment of intraperitoneal conditions and is associated with an overall low rate of conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy during colectomy. This technique may reduce expense and morbidity for patients who ultimately require laparotomy, while allowing some patients with complex disease to be managed laparoscopically who would not normally be considered for a minimally invasive procedure.

Background: The optimal strategy for colonic polyps not amenable to traditional endoscopic polypectomy is unknown. Endoscopic step up is a promising strategy for definitive treatment., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether endoscopic step up leads to improved outcomes and decreased costs compared with planned colectomy for endoscopically unresectable colon polyps., Design: This was a retrospective review of a prospective database., Setting: The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center., Patients: Consecutive patients referred for endoscopically unresectable colon polyps 15 to 50 mm in size were included., Interventions: Patients underwent planned colectomy or endoscopic step up at the surgeon's discretion. Endoscopic step up began with diagnostic colonoscopy in the operating room. If the polyp was amenable to endoscopic removal, endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed with progression to combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery or laparoscopic colectomy, as indicated., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was 30-day adverse events. We also examined length of stay, hospital charges, insurer payments, and polyp recurrence., Results: A total of 52 patients underwent planned colectomy (48 laparoscopic), and 38 underwent endoscopic step up (28 endoscopic mucosal resection, 2 endoscopic submucosal dissection, 6 combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery, and 2 colectomy). Compared with planned colectomy, endoscopic step-up patients had fewer complications (13% vs 33%; p = 0.03) and shorter length of stay (median, 0 vs 4 d; p < 0.001). There was 1 readmission in the endoscopic step-up group and 5 in the planned colectomy group. Endoscopic step-up patients had lower hospital costs ($4790 vs $13,004; p < 0.001) and insurer payments ($2431 vs $19,951; p < 0.001). One-year polyp recurrence-free survival was 84% (95% CI, 67%-93%) in endoscopic step-up patients. All of the recurrences were benign, <1 cm, and managed endoscopically., Limitations: The study was limited by its nonrandomized design and short follow-up., Conclusions: An endoscopic step-up approach to colon polyps is associated with less morbidity, decreased healthcare costs, and colon preservation in 95% of patients. Additional studies are needed to evaluate long-term quality of life and polyp recurrence in this group. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B188., Endoscopic Step Up: UNA ALTERNATIVA A COLECTOMíA PARA PRESERVACIóN DE COLON CON LOS PROPóSITOS DE MEJORAR RESULTADOS Y REDUCIR COSTOS EN PACIENTES CON PóLIPOS NEOPLáSICOS AVANZADOS: Se desconoce la estrategia óptima para los pólipos de colon no susceptibles a la polipectomia endoscópica tradicional. Endoscopic Step Up es una estrategia prometedora para el tratamiento definitivo.Determinar si Endoscopic Step Up produce mejores resultados y menores costos en comparación con la colectomía programada para pólipos de colon endoscópicamente no resecables.Revisión retrospectiva de una base de datos prospectiva.Centro de referencia de tercer nivel.Pacientes consecutivos remitidos para pólipos de colon endoscópicamente irresecables de tamaño 15-50 mm.Los pacientes se sometieron a colectomía programada o Endoscópico Step Up a discreción del cirujano. Endoscopic Step Up comenzó con una colonoscopia diagnóstica en el quirófano. Si el pólipo era susceptible de extirpación endoscópica, la resección endoscópica de la mucosa o la disección submucosa endoscópica se realizaba con progresión a cirugía endoscópica-laparoscópica combinada o colectomía laparoscópica, según a cosnideraciones clínicas en el transoperatorio.El resultado primario fue los eventos adversos a 30 días. Duración de la estadía hospitalaria, los cargos hospitalarios, los pagos de las aseguradoras y la recurrencia de pólipos también fueron examinados.Un total de 52 pacientes se sometieron a colectomía programada (48 laparoscópicas) y 38 se sometieron a Endoscopic Step Up (28 resección endoscópica de la mucosa, 2 disección submucosa endoscópica, 6 cirugía endoscópica-laparoscópica combinada y 2 colectomía). En comparación con la colectomía programada los pacientes endoscópicos Step Up tuvieron menos complicaciones (13% versus 33%, p = 0.03) y una estadía hospitalaria más corta (mediana 0 versus 4 días, p <0.001). Hubo 1 reingreso hospitalario en el grupo Endoscopic Step Up y 5 en el grupo de colectomía programada. Los pacientes endoscópicos Step Up tuvieron costos hospitalarios más bajos ($ 4,790 versus $ 13,004, p <0,001) y pagos de la aseguradora ($ 2,431 versus $ 19,951, p <0,001). La supervivencia libre de recurrencia de pólipos a un año fue del 84% (IC 95% 67-93) en pacientes endoscópicos Step Up. Todas las recurrencias fueron benignas, <1 cm, y manejadas endoscópicamente.Diseño no aleatorizado y seguimiento corto.El abordaje endoscópico Step Up para pólipos de colon se asocia con menos morbilidad, disminución de los costos de atención médica y preservación del colon en el 95% de los pacientes. Se ocupan más estudios para evaluar la calidad de vida a largo plazo y la recurrencia de pólipos en este grupo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B188. (Traducción-Dr Adrián Ortega Robles).

Objective: Colorectal surgery (CRS) training has seen many changes over the years. This study sought to identify aspects of CRS residency curriculum that were most valued by recent graduates and what changes could be made to improve training., Design: Semistructured interviews were performed with board-certified colorectal surgeons 2 to 7years removed from their CRS residency. Interview responses were qualitatively analyzed and converted to coded, categorizable data. Subjects were recruited via a snowball sampling method., Setting: Interviews were conducted in person and via telephone with surgeons in a variety of practices across the United States and Canada. Analysis was performed by a team at Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA, an academic, tertiary care center., Participants: Board certified colorectal surgeons 2 to 7years removed from CRS residency., Results: Twenty surgeons from 11 different CRS residencies were interviewed. At the time of the interview, surgeons were employed in 13 states and 1 foreign country. When asked what aspects of their CRS residency were of value, surgeons produced 74 comments emphasizing: volume of cases (65% of subjects), variety of cases (55%), development of technical skills (40%), management of specific diseases (35%), faculty (30%), mentorship (30%), and practice management (15%). With regard to technical skills, surgeons cited pelvic surgery (40%) and minimally invasive techniques (45%) as the exposures that helped them become successful. When discussing what could be added to training, subjects made 54 comments identifying: more robotic exposure (35%), more anorectal disease (30%), more pelvic floor exposure (25%), and practice management/billing (35%) as items to incorporate. Sixty five percent of subjects believed that "nothing" should be eliminated from their training., Conclusions: Young colon and rectal surgeons valued their training highly and strongly declined to eliminate any substantial part of the existing curriculum. They also expressed a strong desire to add more elements to the CRS residency including further robotic training, more anorectal, more pelvic floor, and further training in practice management., (Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence after the treatment of patients with rectal cancer with open (OPEN) or laparoscopic (LAP) resection., Background: This randomized clinical trial (ACOSOG [Alliance] Z6051), performed between 2008 and 2013, compared LAP and OPEN resection of stage II/III rectal cancer, within 12 cm of the anal verge (T1-3, N0-2, M0) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The rectum and mesorectum were resected using open instruments for rectal dissection (included hybrid hand-assisted laparoscopic) or with laparoscopic instruments under pneumoperitoneum. The 2-year DFS and recurrence were secondary endpoints of Z6051., Methods: The DFS and recurrence were not powered, and are being assessed for superiority. Recurrence was determined at 3, 6, 9, 12, and every 6 months thereafter, using carcinoembryonic antigen, physical examination, computed tomography, and colonoscopy. In all, 486 patients were randomized to LAP (243) or OPEN (243), with 462 eligible for analysis (LAP = 240 and OPEN = 222). Median follow-up is 47.9 months., Results: The 2-year DFS was LAP 79.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.4-84.9) and OPEN 83.2% (95% CI 78.3-88.3). Local and regional recurrence was 4.6% LAP and 4.5% OPEN. Distant recurrence was 14.6% LAP and 16.7% OPEN.Disease-free survival was impacted by unsuccessful resection (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.21-2.91): composite of incomplete specimen (HR 1.65, 95% CI 0.85-3.18); positive circumferential resection margins (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.40-3.79); positive distal margin (HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.30-3.77)., Conclusion: Laparoscopic assisted resection of rectal cancer was not found to be significantly different to OPEN resection of rectal cancer based on the outcomes of DFS and recurrence.

Background: Hospital readmission and anastomotic leak following colorectal resection have a negative impact on patients, surgeons, and the health care system. Novel markers of patients unlikely to experience these complications are of value in avoiding readmission., Objective: This study aimed to determine the predictive value of C-reactive protein for readmission and anastomotic leak within 30 days following colorectal resection., Design: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively compiled single-institution database., Patients: From January 1, 2013, to July 20, 2017, consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resection with anastomosis without the presence of proximal intestinal stoma, who had C-reactive protein measured on postoperative day 3, were included., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measured was the predictive value of C-reactive protein measured on postoperative day 3 for readmission or anastomotic leak within 30 days after colorectal resection., Results: Of the 752 patients examined, 73 (10%) were readmitted within 30 days of surgery and 17 (2%) had an anastomotic leak. Mean C-reactive protein in patients who neither had an anastomotic leak nor were readmitted (127 ± 77 mg/L) was lower than for patients who were readmitted (157 ± 96 mg/L, p = 0.002) and lower than for patients who had an anastomotic leak (228 ± 123 mg/L, p = 0.0000002). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for readmission was 0.59, with a cutoff value of 145 mg/L, generating a 93% negative predictive value. The area under the curve for the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for anastomotic leak was 0.76, with a cutoff value of 147 mg/L generating a 99% negative predictive value., Limitations: This study was limited by its retrospective design and because all patients were treated at a single center., Conclusions: Patients with a C-reactive protein below 145 mg/L on postoperative day 3 after colorectal resection have a low likelihood of readmission within 30 days, and a very low likelihood of anastomotic leak. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A761.

Background: ACS-NSQIP classifies hospitals as "high outliers" if their performance is significantly worse than expected. We determined how often hospitals return to as-expected performance after being newly identified as outliers., Methods: Outlier status was identified in ACS-NSQIP semi-annual reports (SARs) 2008-2011 for 13 postoperative adverse events. Pearson correlation and R 2 measured the relationship between frequency of changes in outlier status, frequency of outlier identification, and adverse event rate., Results: Among 284 hospitals, 75% were classified as high outliers for an adverse event at least once. New high outliers frequently did not remain outliers in the next SAR. Of new outliers, mortality had the highest percentage return to as-expected performance (62.7%), while surgical site infection had the lowest (20.5%). The likelihood of an outlier hospital returning to as-expected performance was inversely related to the percentage of hospitals classified as outliers. The percentage of hospitals classified as outliers for an event explained 60% of variation in outlier hospitals returning to as-expected performance., Conclusions: Outlier status may be less meaningful for adverse events with relatively few outlier hospitals., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hypothermia has been associated with an increase in the rate of infectious complications following colectomy. We hypothesized that a substantial fraction of temperature loss in patients undergoing elective colectomy occurs prior to operation., Methods: Temperature data were collected from 105 consecutive patients undergoing elective colectomy at a single institution., Results: The study population consisted of 105 patients; 67(64%) male, median age 59 years (range 17-95 years), median body mass index 27 kg/m 2 (range 15-48 kg/m 2 ). Median preoperative temperature was 36.7 °C (range 35.2-39.2 °C), dropping to 35.7 °C (range 34.0-37.3 °C) immediately following intubation and then rising to 36.2 °C (range 34.0-38.0 °C) prior to leaving the operating room. The median first postoperative temperature was 36.3 °C (range 34.4-37.7 °C). Temperatures were significantly different from one another (p < 0.05, ANOVA), except for the last operative and first postoperative temperature. A first postoperative temperature of ≥ 36.0 °C (meeting Surgical Care Improvement criteria Inf-10) was achieved in 78 (74%) of patients. A preoperative temperature of ≥ 36.5 °C was associated with a first postoperative temperature of ≥ 36.0 °C, but operative approach (laparoscopic versus open) was not., Conclusions: Most temperature loss occurs prior to operation in patients undergoing colectomy. Patients are rewarmed during the operative procedure. The time period prior to operation should be the focus of efforts designed to ensure normothermia.

Background: Approximately half of Crohn's patients require intestinal resection, and many need repeat resections., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the increased risk of clinical anastomotic leak in patients with a history of previous intestinal resection undergoing repeat resection with anastomosis for Crohn's disease., Design: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected departmental data with 100% capture., Settings: The study was conducted at the department of colorectal surgery in a tertiary care teaching hospital between July 2007 and March 2016., Patients: A cohort of consecutive patients with Crohn's disease who were treated with intestinal resection and anastomosis, excluding patients with proximal fecal diversion, were included. The cohort was divided into 2 groups, those with no previous resection compared with those with previous resection., Main Outcome Measures: Clinical anastomotic leak within 30 days of surgery was measured., Results: Of the 206 patients who met criteria, 83 patients had previous intestinal resection (40%). The 2 groups were similar in terms of patient factors, immune-suppressing medication use, and procedural factors. Overall, 20 clinical anastomotic leaks were identified (10% leak rate). There were 6 leaks (5%) detected in patients with no previous intestinal resection and 14 leaks (17%) detected in patients with a history of previous intestinal resection (p < 0.005). The OR of anastomotic leak in patients with Crohn's disease with previous resection compared with no previous resection was 3.5 (95% CI, 1.3-9.4). Patients with 1 previous resection (n = 53) had a leak rate of 13%, whereas patients with ≥2 previous resections (n = 30) had a leak rate of 23%. The number of previous resections correlated with increasing risk for clinical anastomotic leak (correlation coefficient = 0.998)., Limitations: This was a retrospective study with limited data to perform a multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Repeat intestinal resection in patients with Crohn's disease is associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leakage when compared with initial resection despite similar patient, medication, and procedural factors. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A459.

Objective: To prospectively evaluate the effect of introducing a clinical skills "passport" on medical students' reporting of their experience with basic clinical skills., Design: A prospective longitudinal intervention study was conducted. Medical students were administered a questionnaire at the conclusion of their 12-week surgery clerkship regarding their experience with 15 clinical skills, inquiring whether they had "learned on surgery clerkship", "learned before surgery clerkship", or "not learned". Preintervention baseline data were obtained for 2 consecutive academic years (n = 213 students). In the third year, students (n = 124) were given a clinical skills passport to document performance of 8 of the 15 skills under the supervision of a surgical resident or faculty member. After excluding from analysis those students who learned a skill before their surgery clerkship, the fraction of students who reported learning clinical skills during their surgery clerkship before and after the introduction of the clinical skills passport was compared using Fisher exact test and chi-squared test, where appropriate (p ≤ 0.003 was considered significant; Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons)., Setting: Washington University School of Medicine., Participants: A total of 337 medical students completing the junior surgery clerkship over a 3-year period were included in the study., Results: All 337 students completed a survey. Considering each skill individually, survey response rate was 5045/5055 (99.8%). Combining all responses for all skills, the fraction of students reporting that skills were learned on the surgery clerkship increased after the introduction of the clinical skills passport (1498/1938 [77%] preintervention vs. 974/1109 [88%] postintervention, p < 0.0001, chi square). After the introduction of the clinical skills passport, the fraction of students reporting that a skill was "learned on surgery clerkship" significantly increased for the 8 skills listed on the passport (1026/1699 [83%] preintervention vs. 685/714 [96%] postintervention, p < 0.0001, chi square), but did not increase for the 7 skills not listed on the passport (472/695 [68%] preintervention vs. 289/395 [73%] postintervention, p = 0.08, chi square). Considering each skill individually, after the introduction of the clinical skills passport, the fraction of students reporting that a skill was "learned on surgery clerkship" significantly increased for 4/15 skills (all listed on the clinical passport) and decreased for 0/15 skills (p < 0.003, Fisher exact test, 2 tailed)., Conclusions: Institution of a clinical skills passport system during a surgery clerkship increased medical student reporting of their performance of basic clinical skills., (Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Auscultation for bowel sounds has been advocated by some clinicians as a method to determine the resolution of postoperative ileus., Objective: Our primary aim was to prospectively evaluate the relationships between bowel sounds and the ability to tolerate oral intake in patients after major abdominal surgery. Secondarily we aimed to evaluate relationships among bowel sounds, flatus and bowel movement, and oral intake., Design: This was a prospective, blinded observational study., Settings: The study was conducted at Western Pennsylvania Hospital., Patients: A total of 124 adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were included., Main Outcome Measures: Data were collected by medical students blinded to the purpose of the study for 10 days postoperatively or until discharge, including the presence of bowel sounds (auscultation for 1 minute), flatus, bowel movement, and tolerance of oral intake (defined as ingestion of ≥1000 mL/24 h and each subsequent day without vomiting). Associations between paired variables were determined using ϕ coefficient testing., Results: The study population consisted of 51 men and 73 women, with a mean age of 64 years (range, 20-92 y). The majority of patients (78/124 (63%)) underwent colorectal resection. The median length of hospital was 6 days. Bowel sounds were not associated with flatus, bowel movement, or tolerance of oral intake throughout the study period. The positive predictive value of bowel sounds in predicting flatus and bowel movement was low in the early postoperative period and remained <25% in predicting tolerance of oral intake throughout the study period. The analysis was repeated, including only those patients undergoing colorectal procedures, and was essentially unchanged. Flatus correlated with bowel movement in the first 6 days postoperation, but neither flatus nor bowel movement was associated with tolerance of oral intake., Limitations: The rate of tolerance of oral intake was relatively modest throughout the study period., Conclusions: Bowel sounds are not associated with flatus, bowel movement, or tolerance of oral intake after major abdominal surgery.

Background: The impact of process improvement through surgeon feedback on outcomes is unclear., Objective: We sought to evaluate the effect of biannual surgeon-specific feedback on outcomes and adherence to departmental and Surgical Care Improvement Project process measures on colorectal surgery outcomes., Design: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected 100% capture surgical quality improvement data., Setting: This study was conducted at the department of colorectal surgery at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2008 through December 2013., Main Outcome Measures: Each surgeon was provided with biannual feedback on process adherence and surgeon-specific outcomes of urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality. We recorded adherence to Surgical Care Improvement Project process measures and departmentally implemented measures (ie, anastomotic leak testing) as well as surgeon-specific outcomes., Results: We abstracted 7975 operations. There was no difference in demographics, laparoscopy, or blood loss. Adherence to catheter removal increased from 73% to 100% (p < 0.0001), whereas urinary tract infection decreased 52% (p < 0.01). Adherence to thromboprophylaxis administration remained unchanged as did the deep vein thrombosis rate (p = not significant). Adherence to preoperative antibiotic administration increased from 72% to 100% (p < 0.0001), whereas surgical site infection did not change (7.6%-6.6%; p = 0.3). There were 2589 operative encounters with anastomoses. For right-sided anastomoses, the proportion of handsewn anastomoses declined from 19% to 1.5% (p < 0.001). For left-sided anastomoses, without diversion, anastomotic leak testing adherence increased from 88% to 95% (p < 0.01). Overall leak rate decreased from 5.2% to 2.9% (p < 0.05)., Limitations: Concurrent process changes make isolation of the impact from individual process improvement changes challenging., Conclusions: Nearly complete adherence to process measures for deep vein thrombosis and surgical site infection did not lead to measureable outcomes improvement. Process measure adherence was associated with decreased rate of anastomotic leak and urinary tract infection. Biannual surgeon-specific feedback of outcomes was associated with improved process measure adherence and improvement in surgical quality.

Purpose: Preoperative short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) has rarely been used for rectal cancer in the United States, although 2 randomized phase 3 trials demonstrate equivalence to conventional chemoradiation (CRT), and recent updates to national guidelines include this regimen as a treatment option. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative SCRT followed by immediate surgery within 1 week to treat rectal cancer in the US setting., Methods and Materials: All patients treated with preoperative SCRT (4 Gy × 5 fractions for total 20 Gy) followed by planned surgery within 1 week at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. Censored cases with ≥2 years of follow-up were included along with any disease failure or death. Patients with cM1 disease were excluded. Patients with yp stage II/III disease typically received adjuvant chemotherapy from the 1990s onwards. The primary outcomes were actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) 5-year locoregional control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) as well as late severe (greater than or equal to grade 3) toxicity., Results: Our analysis included 202 consecutive patients with clinical stage I-III disease treated from 1977 through 2011. Median follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 2-29.2). Five-year disease outcomes were 95.9% ± 1.5% for LC, 76.4% ± 3.1% for DFS, and 84.6% ± 2.6% for OS. For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4 and/or cN+), 5-year LC, DFS, and OS were 95.1% ± 2.1%, 73.3% ± 4.3%, and 80.6% ± 3.7%, respectively. The late severe toxicity rate was 11.4%., Conclusions: SCRT followed by immediate surgery is a safe and effective treatment for patients with rectal cancer in the United States. Though SCRT has not been widely adopted, recent updates to the national guidelines for rectal cancer as well as financial pressures to reduce healthcare costs may lead to increased utilization of this treatment regimen in the future., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this article is to evaluate geographic variation in the incidence of diverticulitis and examine behavioral and environmental factors associated with high rates of diverticulitis across the United States. We used state hospital discharge data from 20 states to determine rates of inpatient diverticulitis from January 2002 to December 2004 at patient's county of residence. Next, we merged the county level data with behavioral and environmental survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Finally, we determined the association between behavioral and environmental factors (i.e., teeth removal, dental cleaning, air quality, smoking, alcohol, vaccine, vitamins, and mental health) and high rates of diverticulitis. From January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2004, a total of 345,216 hospitalizations for acute diverticulitis were recorded for 1,055 counties. We identified rates of diverticulitis that ranged from 35.4 to 332.7 per 100,000 population. On univariate analysis, high diverticulitis burden was associated with regions of the country with substantial tooth loss from dental disease (45.8% for high diverticulitis counties vs. 37.5% for low diverticulitis counties; p = 0.0001). There is considerable variability in diverticulitis cases by county of residence across the nation. Potential triggers of diverticulitis may be associated with tooth removal and sun exposure.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between appendicitis and diverticulitis., Design: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis., Setting: This study was conducted in a subspecialty practice at a tertiary care facility., Patients: We examined the rate of appendectomy among 4 cohorts of patients: 1) patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy, 2) inpatients with medically treated diverticulitis, 3) patients who underwent left-sided colectomy for diverticulitis, and 4) patients who underwent colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer., Interventions: There were no interventions., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measured was the appendectomy rate., Results: We studied a total of 928 patients in this study. There were no differences in the patient characteristics of smoking status, nonsteroidal use, or history of irritable bowel syndrome across the 4 study groups. Patients with surgically treated diverticulitis had significantly more episodes of diverticulitis (2.8 ± 1.9) than the medically treated group (1.4 ± 0.8) (p < 0.0001). The rate of appendectomy was 8.2% for the diverticulosis control group, 13.5% in the cancer group, 23.5% in the medically treated diverticulitis group, and 24.5% in the surgically treated diverticulitis group (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for demographics and other clinical risk factors, patients with diverticulitis had 2.8 times higher odds of previous appendectomy (p < 0.001) than the control groups., Limitations: The retrospective study design is associated with selection, documentation, and recall bias., Conclusions: Our data reveal significantly higher appendectomy rates in patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis, medically or surgically managed, in comparison with patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis. Therefore, we propose that appendicitis and diverticulitis share similar risk factors and potentially a common pathological link.

Readmissions pose a significant hardship for patients and constitute a major quality and financial concern for hospitals. We sought to define risk factors associated with hospital readmission after colorectal surgery at a tertiary care hospital. We evaluated readmission among all patients who underwent a colorectal surgical procedure between July 16, 2007 and June 30, 2011. In a cohort of 4879 operative encounters, 492 (10%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Procedures with highest readmissions included stoma creation (22%), ileoanal pouch surgery (22%), and total proctocolectomy (30%). In multivariate analysis, the following variables were associated with risk of readmission: postoperative complication, use of anxiolytics, high comorbidity score, patient setting, alcohol use, and stoma creation. Surgeon of record was not associated with readmission. In conclusion, several patient, procedural, and postoperative factors were associated with an increased risk of readmission. Considerably high rates of readmission were noted after stoma creation, ileoanal pouch procedures, and proctocolectomy. Surgeon of record was not associated with risk of readmission, indicating little value to this metric as a physician-specific indicator of quality.

Background: We sought to determine the differential role of patient safety indicator (PSI) events on mortality after weekend as compared with weekday admission., Materials and Methods: We evaluated Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PSI events within a cohort of patients with nonelective admissions. First, we identified all patients with a PSI based on day of admission (weekend versus weekday). Then, we evaluated the outcome of mortality after each PSI event. Finally, we entered age, sex, race, median household income, payer information, and Charlson comorbidity scores in regression models to develop risk ratios of weekend to weekday PSI events and mortality., Results: There were 28,236,749 patients evaluated with 428,685 (1.5%) experiencing one or more PSI events. The rate of PSI was the same for patients admitted on weekends as compared to weekdays (1.5%). However, the risk of mortality was 7% higher if a PSI event occurred to a patient admitted on a weekend as compared with a weekday. In addition, compared to patients admitted on weekdays, patients admitted on weekends had a 36% higher risk of postoperative wound dehiscence, 19% greater risk of death in a low-mortality diagnostic-related group, 19% increased risk of postoperative hip fracture, and 8% elevated risk of surgical inpatient death., Conclusions: Risk adjusted data reveal that PSI events are substantially higher among patients admitted on weekends. The considerable differences in death after PSI events in patients admitted on weekends as compared with weekdays indicate that responses to adverse events may be less effective on weekends., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Operative results of volvulus are largely unknown because of infrequent diagnosis., Objective: We examined the results of operative intervention for colonic volvulus., Design: We merged trackable data from the California Inpatient Database with Supplemental Files for Revisit Analyses between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007., Settings: Trackable data from California discharge records., Patients: We identified all of the patients with colonic volvulus who underwent 1 of 4 surgical procedures, including manipulation/fixation of the colon, right colectomy, left colectomy, or total colectomy., Main Outcome Measures: During the 36-month study period, we identified recurrence risk, recurrence requiring reoperation, time to reoperation, stoma formation, disposition on discharge, and in-hospital mortality. Fisher exact, χ(2), and ANOVA tests were used when appropriate., Results: We identified 2141 patients with colonic volvulus who were undergoing intraoperative manipulation/fixation of the colon (n = 209 (12%)), right (n = 728 (41%)), left (n = 781 (44%)), or total colectomy (n = 56 (3%)). Patients treated with intraoperative manipulation/fixation were younger, more likely to be women, and more likely to have private insurance. Patients who underwent total colectomy had the highest risk of mortality (21%), highest risk of stoma creation (64%), and longest length of stay (18 days); were more likely to be readmitted (9%); and were the most likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (48%). Patients treated with intraoperative manipulation/fixation had the lowest mortality, risk of stoma formation, length of stay, and likelihood of discharge to skilled nursing facility but the highest risk of subsequent procedures for volvulus (26%) over a follow-up ranging from 0 to 687 days., Limitations: This study was limited by retrospective study design, heterogeneous patient factors, and inability to identify the time of last follow-up., Conclusions: The majority of patients with volvulus underwent a resectional procedure. A subset without resection had favorable initial outcomes but remained at high risk for subsequent procedures. There may be a potential role for evaluating intraoperative manipulation/fixation in a small subset of patients with colonic volvulus.

Background: There is an accelerated effort to reduce hospital readmissions despite minimal data detailing risk factors associated with this outcome., Materials and Methods: We analyzed National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data from January 1, 2011-December 31, 2011, evaluating all patients undergoing one of 34 targeted operative procedures across all surgical specialties. Multivariate regression models of risk for readmission were developed including targeted procedure codes, demographic variables, preoperative variables, intraoperative variables, and postoperative adverse events. Our main outcome measure was hospital readmission., Results: A total of 217, 389 patients met study inclusion criteria. Minimal associations existed between patient factors and risk of readmission. Adverse events including unplanned operating room return (odds ratio [OR] 8.5; confidence interval [CI] 8.0-9.0), pulmonary embolism (OR 8.2; CI 7.1-9.6), deep incisional infection (OR 7.5; CI 6.7-8.5), and organ space infection (OR 5.8; CI 5.3-6.3) were associated with increased risk of readmission. Our data suggest the type of procedure performed is significantly associated with risk of readmission. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed procedures, involving the pancreas, rectum, bladder, and lower extremity vascular bypass, were associated with the highest risk of readmission., Conclusions: Postoperative complications demonstrated stronger association with readmission than patient factors. Focused analysis of higher risk procedures may provide insight into strategies for risk reduction., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Efforts to improve the quality of surgical care and reduce morbidity and mortality have resulted in outcomes reporting at the service and institutional level. Surgeon-specific outcomes are not readily available., Objective: The aim of this study is to compare surgeon-specific outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 100% capture institutional quality data., Design: We conducted a cohort study evaluating institutional and surgeon-specific outcomes following colorectal surgery procedures at 1 institution over 5 years., Patients: All patients who underwent an operation by a colorectal surgeon at Lahey Hospital & Medical Center from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2012 were identified., Main Outcome Measures: Thirty-day mortality, reoperation, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, superficial surgical site infection, and organ space infection were the primary outcomes measured., Analysis: We compared annual and 5-year institutional and surgeon-specific adverse event rates between the data sets. In addition, we categorized individual surgeons as low-outlier, average, or high-outlier in relation to aggregate averages and determined the concordance between the data sets in identifying outliers. Concordance was designated if the 2 databases classified outlier status similarly for the same adverse event category., Results: In the 100% capture institutional data, 6459 operative encounters were identified in comparison with 1786 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program encounters (28% sampled). Annual aggregate adverse event rates were similar between the institutional data and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. For annual surgeon-specific comparisons, concordance in identifying outliers between the 2 data sets was 51.4%, and gross discordance between outlier status was in 8.2%. Five-year surgeon-specific comparisons demonstrated 59% concordance in identifying outlier status with 8.2% gross discordance for the group., Limitations: The inclusion of data from only 1 academic referral center is a limitation of this study., Conclusions: Each surgeon was identified as a "high outlier" in at least 1 adverse event category. Comparisons at the annual and 5-year points demonstrated poor concordance between our 100% capture institutional data and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

The rate of reoperation after transabdominal as compared with transperineal repair for rectal prolapse is unknown. We evaluated all patients who underwent surgical treatment for rectal prolapse performed through transabdominal or transperineal repair from the trackable California Inpatient data files and Revisit Analyses during the time period of January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2007. We specifically evaluated rates of reoperation and stoma formation during the 36-month study period. A total of 3400 patient discharges with rectal prolapse from California during the 36-month study period was identified. Of this cohort, 1772 patients had one or more prolapse repairs. Procedures were more likely to be performed through a transabdominal (1035 [58%]) as compared with a transperineal approach (737 [42%]). There was no difference in reoperation for transabdominal (11%) as compared with transperineal procedures (11%; P = 0.9). However, a significantly larger proportion of patients underwent stoma formation after transabdominal (8%) as compared with transperineal repair (5%; P < 0.02). Time to reoperation was not significantly different for patients treated with transabdominal (295 ± 254 days) as compared with transperineal repair (271 ± 246 days; P = 0.6). In conclusion, the risk of reoperation is substantial for both transabdominal and transperineal procedures for rectal prolapse.

Background: Validated risk adjustment programs do not use patient diagnosis as a potential covariate in the evaluation of organ space infections., Objective: We hypothesized that patient diagnosis is an important risk factor for organ space infection after colorectal resections., Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study abstracting data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from January 2005 through December 2009., Patients: Patients who underwent 1 of 3 types of colorectal resections (ileocolostomy, partial colectomy, and coloproctostomy) were identified by the use of Current Procedural Terminology codes. We excluded patients with concomitant formation of diverting or end stoma., Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measured was organ space infection., Analysis: Validated risk adjustment models were used with the addition of diagnostic codes., Results: We identified 52,056 patients who underwent a colorectal resection of whom 1774 patients developed an organ space infection (3.4%) and 894 (50.2%) returned to the operating room for further surgery. For ileocolostomy, operations for endometriosis (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.7-36.6) and intra-abdominal fistula surgery (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-6.0) were associated with increased risk of organ space infection. For partial colectomy, operations for intra-abdominal fistula surgery (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3), IBD (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6-3.8), and bowel obstruction (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6) were associated with an increased risk of organ space infection. For coloproctostomy, operations for malignant neoplasm (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3) and diverticular bleeding (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-9.0) were associated with an increased risk of organ space infection., Limitations: This study was limited by the retrospective study design., Conclusions: After adjustment for National Surgical Quality Improvement Program covariates, intra-abdominal fistula, endometriosis, and diverticular bleeding were the diagnoses associated with the highest risk of organ space infection following colorectal resections.

Introduction: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of stoma creation on deep and superficial surgical site infections after an index colorectal surgical procedure., Methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We evaluated all patients who underwent colorectal surgery procedures from January 2005 to December 2009 with or without creation of a stoma and sought to identify the effect of stoma creation on deep and superficial surgical site infections., Results: A total of 79,775 patients underwent colorectal procedures (laparoscopic 30.7%, open 69.3%), while 8,113 patients developed a surgical site infection (10.2%). The univariate analysis revealed that surgical site infections were much more common in patients with a stoma compared to those with no stoma (11.8% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, stoma construction during the index colorectal procedure (OR 1.3, CI 1.2 to 1.4), ASA class ≥2, smoking, and abnormal body mass index were associated with surgical site infection., Conclusions: The construction of a stoma with colorectal procedures is associated with a higher risk of surgical site infection. Although the stoma effect on surgical site infection is attenuated with laparoscopic techniques, the association remained statistically significant.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether mobilization of the splenic flexure during anterior resection is associated with an increased number of complications., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of all non-emergent anterior resections with anastomosis (open and laparoscopic) between January 2005 and December 2009 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Infectious, renal, and pulmonary adverse events as well as operative times were analyzed for cases with splenic flexure mobilization as compared to no mobilization. We then constructed multivariate models to identify risk factors for postsurgical adverse events., Results: During the 5-year study period, 6,324 (57 %) open resections and 4,788 (43 %) laparoscopic resections were performed. Mobilization of the splenic flexure was associated with an increase in operating room time (204 vs 172 min, p < 0.0001). Although anastomotic leaks were not recorded, there was no difference in organ space infections (3.9 vs 3.7 %, p = 0.7) or return to operating room events between the two groups. However, patients who underwent splenic flexure mobilization had significantly more superficial surgical site infections (10.6 vs 8.4 %, p < 0.0002). Multivariate analysis accounting for laparoscopic or open surgery and standard preoperative and intraoperative variables demonstrated a persistent increase in superficial surgical site infections for patients with splenic flexure mobilization., Conclusions: Operating room times are longer and superficial surgical site infections are more common when the splenic flexure is mobilized. The absolute indications for splenic flexure mobilization should be addressed in further research.

Background: Several studies have demonstrated increased inhospital mortality following weekend admission. We hypothesized that the presence of resident trainees reduces the weekend mortality trends., Methods: We identified all patients with a non-elective hospital admission from 1/1/2003 through 12/31/2008. We abstracted vital status on discharge and calculated the Charlson comorbidity score for all inpatients. We compared odds of inpatient mortality following non-elective admission on a weekend day as compared to a weekday, while considering diagnosis, patient characteristics, comorbidity, hospital factors, and care at hospitals with resident trainees., Results: Data were available for 48,253,968 patient discharges during the six-year study period. The relative risk of mortality was 15% higher following weekend admission as compared to weekday admission. After adjusting for diagnosis, age, sex, race, income level, payer, comorbidity, and weekend admission the overall odds of mortality was higher for patients in hospitals with fewer nurses and staff physicians. Mortality following a weekend admission for patients admitted to a hospital with resident trainees was significantly higher (17%) than hospitals with no resident trainees (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Low staffing levels of nurses and physicians significantly impact mortality on weekends following non-elective admission. Conversely, patients admitted to hospitals with more resident trainees had significantly higher mortality following a weekend admission.

In this study we sought to identify changes in the etiology and surgical treatment of acute gastrointestinal perforations in the United States over the past 20 years. We performed a retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2007. We first identified all patients with gastrointestinal perforations, the perforated organ, and treatment rendered. During the study period, 550,132 patients experienced a gastrointestinal perforation for a mean rate of 3.9 cases per 1,000 discharges. Total number of perforations rose significantly over the study period, yet surgical procedures were performed in less than half of the patients (47.6%). The most common surgical procedures for gastrointestinal perforation were colorectal in origin (38.3%), upper gastrointestinal tract (30.0%), small intestine (29.2%), esophagus (3.0%), and anus (0.1%). At study end, colorectal procedures for perforation were the most commonly performed (40.4%), whereas upper gastrointestinal procedures experienced the greatest decline. In conclusion, our data demonstrate a decline in procedures for upper gastrointestinal perforation and an increase in colorectal procedures during the two-decade study period. These data should be used to assist in the training of acute care surgeons.

Introduction: There has been increased attention focused on reducing postoperative length of stay and mortality following colorectal surgery. We sought to identify adverse events associated with prolonged length of stay and mortality., Methods: We evaluated postoperative "adverse events," prolonged length of stay, and mortality within 30 days of colorectal surgery in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) hospitals from January 2005 through December 2008. We then used multivariate models to establish the associations between adverse events and prolonged length of stay and mortality., Results: A total of 54,237 patients underwent colorectal surgery: 39,980 (74 %) experienced no postoperative adverse events, while 14,257 (26 %) experienced one or more adverse events. Length of stay was prolonged (longer than 10 days) in 38 % of patients who experienced a postoperative adverse event and in 15 % of patients without events. Mortality increased with the number of postoperative adverse events. In multivariate models including preoperative comorbidity, patient risk factors, and adverse events, patients who experienced a cardiac arrest, septic shock, stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or renal failure were at highest odds of dying within 30 days of surgery., Conclusions: Patients with cardiac arrest, septic shock, stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or renal failure are at highest risk of mortality following colorectal surgery.

Aim: We sought to identify the rate of re-operation after an index colorectal surgical procedure and potential contributing risk factors., Method: This is a retrospective cohort study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We identified all patients who either returned or did not return to the operating room after any colorectal resection from January 2005 to December 2008., Results: From a total cohort of 635, 265 patients included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program over the 4-year study period, we identified 54, 237 patients who underwent colorectal operations. A return to the operating room was coded in 5.4 ± 0.1% of non colorectal resection patients and 7.6 ± 0.2% of colorectal resection patients (P < 0.001). The multivariate model identified patients with postoperative diagnostic codes for abdominal cavity hernia or colostomy complication as having the highest odds of return to the operating room within 30 days. Patients returning to the operating room had longer length of stay and higher overall mortality compared with those patients who did not return to the operating room., Conclusion: Return to the operating room is a relatively common occurrence after colorectal resections, with an associated high rate of mortality. Given the association between return to the operating room and adverse patient outcomes, emphasis should be placed on determining strategies to reduce the need for return to the operating room., (© 2011 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2011 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: Data comparing surgical outcomes following abdominal and transperineal approaches for rectal prolapse are limited., Objective: We sought to identify differences in postoperative complications following abdominal vs transperineal approaches to rectal prolapse., Design: We studied a retrospective cohort in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from January 2005 through December 2008., Patients: We identified all patients who underwent surgical treatment for rectal prolapse., Intervention: We compared surgical outcomes of standard abdominal approaches compared with standard transperineal approaches to rectal prolapse., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes measured were the validated morbidity outcomes and 30-day mortality., Results: During the study period, 1485 patients underwent rectal prolapse surgery (706 abdominal and 779 transperineal). Patients treated with abdominal approaches had significantly higher rates of infectious (9.8% vs 3.7%) and overall (12.9% vs 7.6%) complications in comparison with those treated with transperineal approaches. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for overall complications were ASA class 4 (OR 6.4) and abdominal surgery (OR 2.3), whereas an albumin level of ≥ 2.5 was protective (OR 0.05). Significant predictors of infectious complications were ASA class 4 (OR 7.5), BMI >25 (OR 1.8), and rectal prolapse surgery performed with an abdominal approach (OR 2.8)., Limitations: The retrospective design introduces potential selection bias., Conclusions: Abdominal surgery for rectal prolapse is a predictor of both infectious and overall complications. Patients with significant comorbidities or a high BMI are at particularly high risk for complications and may be better suited for a transperineal rather than abdominal approach for the treatment of rectal prolapse.