1. Inter-laboratory comparison of Ki-67 proliferating index detected by visual assessment and automated digital image analysis.
- Author
-
Tomić S, Mrklić I, Razumović JJ, Jonjić N, Šarčević B, Blažičević V, Jurković I, Vrbičić B, Lisica Šikic N, Peteh LL, Lončarić ČT, Vučić M, Gašparov S, Švagelj D, Radiković S, and Mahovne I
- Subjects
- Automation, Laboratory standards, Automation, Laboratory statistics & numerical data, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Croatia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted statistics & numerical data, Immunohistochemistry, Laboratories, Hospital statistics & numerical data, Paraffin Embedding, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Cell Proliferation, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted standards, Ki-67 Antigen analysis, Laboratories, Hospital standards
- Abstract
Background: Proliferation rate is a major determinant of the biologic behavior of the tumor and provides information that can be used to guide treatment decisions., Methods: This ring study included 27 pathologists from 14 Institutions, in order to assess inter-observer concordance between pathologists in Croatia. We analyzed Ki-67 proliferative index on ten randomly selected breast cancer samples comparing consistency between visual assessment using light microscopy compared to digital image analyses results from one central laboratory as a referral value., Results: When we analyzed Ki-67 as numeric value high concordance rate was found between Ki-67 score visually assessed in all participating Institutions compared to referral value assessed by digital image analysis (ICC 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.91), and Krippendorff's alpha was 0.79 (95% CI 0.58-1.00). Concordance was better in slides with higher Ki-67 values. When we categorized Ki-67 values according to generally accepted 20% cut-off value we noticed the lower concordance rate among participants in our study., Conclusion: Proliferation remains one of the most important parameters for tumor characterization helpful in making clinical decisions, but it should be used with great caution. Standardization of the Ki-67 assessment is essential and proliferating index should be expressed as exact numeric value. For patients with proliferative index near the cut-off value, other factors must be considered in making clinical decisions.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF