Search

Since 1984, Republican administrations in the US have enacted the global gag rule (GGR), which prohibits non-US-based non-governmental organisations (NGOs) from providing, referring for, or counselling on abortion as a method of family planning, or advocating for the liberalisation of abortion laws, as a condition for receiving certain categories of US Global Health Assistance. Versions of the GGR implemented before 2017 applied to US Family Planning Assistance only, but the Trump administration expanded the policy's reach by applying it to nearly all types of Global Health Assistance. Documentation of the policy's harms in the peer-reviewed and grey literature has grown considerably in recent years, however few cross-country analyses exist. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of the GGR's impacts across three countries with distinct abortion laws: Kenya, Madagascar and Nepal. We conducted 479 in-depth qualitative interviews between August 2018 and March 2020. Participants included representatives of Ministries of Health and NGOs that did and did not certify the GGR, providers of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services at public and private facilities, community health workers, and contraceptive clients. We observed greater breakdown of NGO coordination and chilling effects in countries where abortion is legal and there is a sizeable community of non-US-based NGOs working on SRH. However, we found that the GGR fractured SRH service delivery in all countries, irrespective of the legal status of abortion. Contraceptive service availability, accessibility and training for providers were particularly damaged. Further, this analysis makes clear that the GGR has substantial and deleterious effects on public sector infrastructure for SRH in addition to NGOs., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The identification of allergens is essential in the management of allergic rhinitis. Sugarcane produces anemophilic pollen. The purpose of our study is to assess the role of sugarcane pollen in the occurrence of allergic rhinitis. We conducted a case-control analytical study of patients living in a Malagasy rural commune in which sugarcane cultivation and processing are important sources of employment, from July 2017 to June 2018. We enrolled 182 patients (91 cases and 91 controls). Factors associated with the occurrence of symptoms of allergic rhinitis were: a distance of less than 500 meters between homes and sugarcane fields (OR = 1.50), being a sugarcane worker (OR=1.16) and having a family history of allergic rhinitis (OR=13.67). In addition, exposure to wind gusts (OR=0.84) and outdoor occupation (OR=0.92) were protective factors. Exposure of patients to sugarcane pollen is associated with clinical manifestations of allergic rhinitis and confirms the role of this allergen in the occurrence of the disease. Avoidance and hygiene measures are the basis of treatment., Competing Interests: Les auteurs ne déclarent aucun conflit d´intérêts., (Copyright: Patrick Maholisoa Randrianandraina et al.)

Introduction: malnutrition due to inadequate food supply is a major challenge in low- and middle-income countries. The purpose of this study is to identify the sociocultural drivers of malnutrition., Methods: we conducted a qualitative study in the Amoron´I Mania region, Madagascar. The study involved pregnant women, mothers and fathers, grandmothers and health actors such as "matrones", community workers and health workers. A total of 24 semi-structured individual interviews and 6 focus groups were used to collect data. Thematic analysis was used., Results: malnutrition refers to a lack of food and undernourishment. It revolves around the amount of rice consumption, socio-cultural factors and insufficient financial resources. Vulnerable groups were mainly composed of children and pregnant women. Severe malnutrition including signs was reported, but there was evidence for local adaptation. Thus, families were trying by different means to fight against malnutrition., Conclusion: the socio-cultural context modulates knowledge and perception of the causes, the manifestations and the vulnerability or non-vulnerability of an individual as well as the severity of malnutrition., Competing Interests: Les auteurs ne déclarent aucun conflit d´intérêts., (Copyright: Lantonirina Ravaoarisoa et al.)

Madagascar's health system is highly dependent on donor funding, especially from the United States (US), and relies on a few nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) to provide contraceptive services in remote areas of the country. The Trump administration reinstated and expanded the Global Gag Rule (GGR) in 2017; this policy requires non-US NGOs receiving US global health funding to certify that neither they nor their sub-grantees will provide, counsel or refer for abortion as a method of family planning. Evidence of the impact of the GGR in a country with restrictive abortion laws, like Madagascar - which has no explicit exception to save the woman's life - is limited. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 259 representatives of the Ministry of Health and NGOs, public and private health providers, community health workers and contraceptive clients in Antananarivo and eight districts between May 2019 and March 2020. Interviews highlighted the impact of the GGR on NGOs that did not certify the policy and lost their US funding. This reduction in funding led to fewer contraceptive service delivery points, including mobile outreach services, a critical component of care in rural areas. Public and private health providers reported increased contraceptive stockouts and fees charged to clients. Although the GGR is ostensibly about abortion, it has reduced access to contraception for the Malagasy population. This is one of few studies to directly document the impact on women who themselves described their increased difficulties obtaining contraception ultimately resulting in discontinuation of contraceptive use, unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions.

Introduction: Madagascar has adopted strategies to fight against maternal malnutrition, but the evaluation of their implementation is not effective.Purpose of research: The present study aims to describe beneficiary appreciation of interventions to fight maternal malnutrition and to identify their expectations., Method: A qualitative study was conducted in the Amoron’i Mania region, Madagascar. The study included mothers of children under 5, pregnant women, and other family members and community members (fathers, grandmothers, matrons and community workers). Six focus groups and 16 individual interviews were conducted to collect the data. The thematic analysis was used., Results: Food supplementation, improved production of agriculture and livestock, and nutrition education, operated by NGOs, are the best-known interventions. The health centers were not mentioned as interveners and their interventions were ignored. The effectiveness of the intervention is generally judged on the benefits perceived by the beneficiaries. Interveners working on a project basis were assessed as unsustainable. Two main problems were mentioned: first, the insufficiency of agricultural production resulting in the inaccessibility of the ingredients required for the nutrition education, and second the low coverage of the interventions. The improvement of agricultural production is the main suggestion mentioned to fight against maternal undernutrition., Conclusions: Beneficiaries thought that existing interventions in the region are insufficient to address the problem of malnutrition among mothers.