Search

Purpose: The objective of this study was to present the 5-year results from a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 randomized trial of every-other-day (EOD) versus once-a-week (QW) urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Between 2012 and 2015, 170 patients with cT1c-3aN0M0 prostate cancer from 9 European institutions were randomized to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy/fraction to the urethra) delivered either EOD (arm A, n = 84) or QW (arm B, n = 86). The median follow-up was 78 months (interquartile range, 66-89 months) and 77 months (interquartile range, 66-82 months) for arms A and B, respectively. Results: Among the 165 patients treated and retained for the final analysis (arm A, n = 82; arm B, n = 83), acute toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 scale) was mild or absent, with no differences between arms. The 5-year grade 2 or greater genitourinary toxicity-free survival was 75.9% and 76.1% for arms A and B, respectively (P =.945), whereas the 5-year grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity-free survival was 89% and 92% for arms A and B, respectively (P =.596). No changes in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-PR25 scores were observed in both arms for genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual domains at 5-year follow-up compared with baseline. At the last follow-up, biochemical failure was observed in 14 patients in the EOD arm and in 7 patients in the QW arm, with a 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival rate of 92.2% and 93% for arms A and B, respectively (P =.13). Conclusions: Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer with a 10% dose reduction to urethra was associated with a minimal effect on urinary function and quality of life regardless of an EOD or QW fractionation schedule. Biochemical control so far has been encouraging and much alike in both study arms, although longer follow-up is probably needed to assess the true value of overall treatment time on disease outcome.

Purpose: To reconstruct the dose delivered during single-fraction urethra-sparing prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) accounting for intrafraction motion monitored by intraprostatic electromagnetic transponders (EMT). Methods: We analyzed data of 15 patients included in the phase I/II "ONE SHOT" trial and treated with a single fraction of 19 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) and 17 Gy to the urethra planning risk volume. During delivery, prostate motion was tracked with implanted EMT. SBRT was interrupted when a 3-mm threshold was trespassed and corrected unless the offset was transient. Motion-encoded reconstructed (MER) plans were obtained by splitting the original plans into multiple sub-beams with isocenter shifts based on recorded EMT positions, mimicking prostate motion during treatment. We analyzed intrafraction motion and compared MER to planned doses. Results: The median EMT motion range (±SD) during delivery was 0.26 ± 0.09, 0.22 ± 0.14 and 0.18 ± 0.10 cm in the antero-posterior, supero-inferior, and left-right axes, respectively. Treatment interruptions were needed for 8 patients because of target motion beyond limits in the antero-posterior (n = 6) and/or supero-inferior directions (n = 4). Comparing MER vs. original plan there was a median relative dose difference of -1.9% (range, -7.9 to -1.0%) and of +0.5% (-0.3-1.7%) for PTV D98% and D2%, respectively. The clinical target volume remained sufficiently covered with a median D98% difference of -0.3% (-1.6-0.5%). Bladder and rectum dosimetric parameters showed significant differences between original and MER plans, but mostly remained within acceptable limits. Conclusions: The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion was minimal for target coverage for single-fraction prostate SBRT with real-time electromagnetic tracking combined with beam gating. Keywords: Dose reconstruction; Electromagnetic transponder; Intrafraction motion; Prostate cancer; Single-fraction; Stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Background To present the 18 months results from a prospective multicenter phase II randomized trial of short vs protracted urethra‐sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Methods Between 2012 and 2015, a total of 170 PCa patients were randomized to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy × 5 to the urethra) delivered either every other day (EOD, arm A, n = 84) or once a week (QW, arm B, n = 86). Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (CTCAE v4.0 scale), IPSS, and QoL scores were assessed at baseline, at the 5th fraction (5fx), 12th weeks (12W), and every 6 months after SBRT. The primary endpoint was biochemical control at 18 months and grade ≥ 3 toxicity (including grade ≥ 2 for urinary obstruction/retention) during the first 3 months. Results Among the 165 patients analyzed, the toxicity stopping rule was never activated during the acute phase. Maximum acute grade 2 GU toxicity rates at 5fx were 17% and 19% for arms A and B, respectively, with only 2 cases of grade 2 GI toxicity at 5fx in arm A. At month 18, grade ≥ 2 GU and GI toxicity decreased below 5% and 2% for both arms. No changes in EORTC QLQ‐PR25 scores for GU, GI, and sexual domains were observed in both arms between baseline and month 18. Four biochemical failures were observed, 2 in each arm, rejecting the null hypothesis of an unfavorable response rate ≤ 85% in favor of an acceptable ≥ 95% rate. Conclusions At 18 months, urethra‐sparing SBRT showed a low toxicity profile, with minimal impact on QoL and favorable biochemical control rates, regardless of overall treatment time (EOD vs QW)., Dose per fraction and overall treatment time can impact tolerance of prostate SBRT. Urethra‐sparing SBRT showed a low toxicity profile and minimal impact on QoL. An EOD or QW SBRT schedule had a comparable tolerance and efficacy at 18 months.

Highlights • 7 patients were implanted with lung-specific electromagnetic transponders (EMT). • We report no complications from implantation and no migration of the EMT. • 7 non-small cell lung cancer patients underwent SBRT using EMT real-time tracking. • SBRT was delivered in free-breathing (FB) or in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH)., Background and purposes Motion management is crucial for optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of moving targets. We aimed to describe our clinical experience with real-time tracking of lung-specific electromagnetic transponders (EMTs) for SBRT of early stage non-small cell lung cancer in free-breathing (FB) or deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). Material and methods Seven patients were implanted with EMTs. Simulation for SBRT was performed in FB and in DIBH. We prescribed 60 Gy in 3, 5 or 8 fractions to the tumor and delivered SBRT with volumetric modulated arcs and a 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam. Patients’ setup at the linac was performed using EMT positions and cone-beam CT (CBCT) verification. Four patients were treated in DIBH because of a dosimetric benefit. We analysed patient alignment and treatment delivery parameters using DIBH or FB and EMT real-time tracking. Results There were no complications from the EMT implantation. Visual inspection of CBCT before and/or after SBRT revealed good alignment of structures and EMTs. The median setup time was 9.8 min (range: 4.6–34.1 min) and the median session time was 14.7 min (range: 7.3–36.5 min). EMT positions in lungs remained stable during overall treatment and allowed real-time tracking both in FB and in DIBH SBRT. The treatment beam was gated when EMT centroid position exceeded tolerance thresholds ensuring correct delivery of radiation to the tumor. Conclusion Using EMTs for real-time tracking of tumor motion during lung SBRT proved to be safe, accurate and easy to integrate clinically for treatments in FB or DIBH.

Purpose The advantage of prone setup compared with supine for left-breast radiotherapy is controversial. We evaluate the dosimetric gain of prone setup and aim to identify predictors of the gain. Methods Left-sided breast cancer patients who had dual computed tomography (CT) planning in prone free breathing (FB) and supine deep inspiration breath-hold (DiBH) were retrospectively identified. Radiation doses to heart, lungs, breasts, and tumor bed were evaluated using the recently developed mean absolute dose deviation (MADD). MADD measures how widely the dose delivered to a structure deviates from a reference dose specified for the structure. A penalty score was computed for every treatment plan as a weighted sum of the MADDs normalized to the breast prescribed dose. Changes in penalty scores when switching from supine to prone were assessed by paired t-tests and by the number of patients with a reduction of the penalty score (i.e., gain). Robust linear regression and fractional polynomials were used to correlate patients’ characteristics and their respective penalty scores. Results Among 116 patients identified with dual CT planning, the prone setup, compared with supine, was associated with a dosimetric gain in 72 (62.1%, 95% CI: 52.6–70.9%). The most significant predictors of a gain with the prone setup were the breast depth prone/supine ratio (>1.6), breast depth difference (>31 mm), prone breast depth (>77 mm), and breast volume (>282 mL). Conclusion Prone compared with supine DiBH was associated with a dosimetric gain in 62.1% of our left-sided breast cancer patients. High pendulousness and moderately large breast predicted for the gain.

Purpose Metallic hip implants (MHI) are common in elderly patients. For pelvic cancers radiotherapy , conventional approaches consist of MHI avoidance during treatment planning, which leads, especially in case of bilateral MHI, to a decreased quality or increased complexity of the treatment plan. The aim of this study is to investigate the necessity of using avoidance sectors (AvSe) using a 2-arcs coplanar pelvic volumetric modulated arc-therapy (VMAT) planning. Methods We evaluated: (1) The dose calculation error of a static 6 MV open beam traversing a MHI; (2) The magnitude of an error's decrease within the planning target volume (PTV) for a 360° VMAT treatment without AvSe as compared to the static open beam; (3) The dosimetric influence of MHI misalignment generated by patient's repositioning rolls during image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Results (1) In the static 6 MV beam configuration, for distances between 0.5 cm and 6 cm from the MHI, the median (maximum, number of points) dose calculation error was −1.55% (−2.5%, 11); (2) Compared to the static open beam, in the 360° VMAT treatment without AvSe a simulated error was decreased by a factor of 4.4/2.4 (median/minimum); (3) MHI anterior-posterior misalignment exceeding 0.6 cm, resulted in error at PTV surface of >2%. Conclusions A standard 2 coplanar arcs 360° VMAT treatment, with dedicated artifact reduction algorithms applied, decreased the error of static beam traversing MHI, in patients presenting a bilateral MHI and might be used to treat the pelvic region without MHI avoidance.

Purpose: To present the radiation therapy quality assurance results from a prospective multicenter phase 2 randomized trial of short versus protracted urethra-sparing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Between 2012 and 2015, 165 patients with prostate cancer from 9 centers were randomized and treated with SBRT delivered either every other day (arm A, n = 82) or once a week (arm B, n = 83); 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions were prescribed to the prostate with (n = 92) or without (n = 73) inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SV), and the urethra planning-risk volume received 32.5 Gy. Patients were treated either with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; n = 112) or with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT; n = 53). Deviations from protocol dose constraints, planning target volume (PTV) homogeneity index, PTV Dice similarity coefficient, and number of monitor units for each treatment plan were retrospectively analyzed. Dosimetric results of VMAT versus IMRT and treatment plans with versus without inclusion of SV were compared. Results: At least 1 major protocol deviation occurred in 51 patients (31%), whereas none was observed in 41. Protocol violations were more frequent in the IMRT group (P 98% (31.1 vs 30.8 Gy, P 2% (37.9 vs 38.7 Gy, P 50% (24.5% vs 33.5%, P =.0001). To achieve its goals volumetric modulated arc therapy required fewer monitor units than IMRT (2275 vs 3378, P 90% (9.1% vs 10.4%, P =.0003) and V80% (13.2% vs 15.7%, P =.0003). Conclusions: Protocol deviations with potential impact on tumor control or toxicity occurred in 31% of patients in this prospective clinical trial. Protocol deviations were more frequent with IMRT. Prospective radiation therapy quality assurance protocols should be strongly recommended for SBRT trials to minimize potential protocol deviations.

Purpose Tumor hypoxia is associated with radioresistance and poor prognosis after radiation therapy for prostate cancer (PCa). In this prospective pilot study, we assessed the ability of 18F-misonidazole (18F-MISO) positron emission tomography (PET)–magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect hypoxia in high-grade PCa patients who were candidates for curative radiation therapy, and we evaluated 18F-MISO PET-MRI modulation after 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT). Methods and Materials Eleven PCa patients with a Gleason score (GS) ≥ 8 underwent 18F-fluorocholine (18F-FCH) PET–computed tomography at diagnosis and an 18F-MISO hybrid PET-MRI examination before nADT; a second 18F-MISO PET-MRI examination was acquired after 3 months of nADT for all patients but one who dropped out because of noncompliance with nADT. Immunohistochemistry for tissue hypoxia- and proliferation-related biomarkers (glucose transporter 1, carbonic anhydrase IX, vascular endothelial growth factor A, Ki-67, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha, and epidermal growth factor receptor) was performed in lesions bearing the highest GS. We used nonparametric tests to assess (1) the presence of 18F-MISO–positive regions (tumor-to-background ratio [TBR] ≥ 1.4) at baseline; (2) the correlation between imaging parameters (PET tracer uptake, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PIRADS] scores, and dynamic contrast enhancement perfusion markers) at baseline; (3) the difference in immunohistochemistry staining between 18F-MISO–positive and –negative lesions; and (4) the changes in 18F-MISO PET-MRI after nADT. Results Uptake of 18F-MISO was significant in 7 patients, being coincidental with the highest GS region in 5 of them. A significant correlation was found at baseline between GS and 18F-MISO TBR, between 18F-MISO TBR and MRI perfusion markers, between GS and 18F-FCH maximum standardized uptake value, between GS and PIRADS score, and between 18F-FCH maximum standardized uptake value and PIRADS score. No difference was found between 18F-MISO–positive and –negative biopsy specimens with respect to tissue biomarkers. The TBR of 18F-MISO diminished significantly after nADT only in high-grade lesions and in regions with a significant uptake at baseline. Conclusions PET imaging with 18F-MISO showed variable uptake in PCa, associated with a higher GS, lowering significantly after 3 months of nADT in high-grade lesions. These results suggest the existence of a hypoxic microenvironment in PCa and a reoxygenation effect of nADT.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the impact of radiation dose on rectal toxicity after salvage external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with or without a brachytherapy boost for exclusive local failures after the primary EBRT for prostate cancer. Methods and materials: Fourteen patients with no severe residual late toxicity after primary EBRT ± brachytherapy were reirradiated after a median time interval of 6.1 years. The median normalized total dose in 2 Gy fractions (NTD2Gy, α/β ratio = 1.5 Gy for prostate cancer cells) was 74 Gy at primary EBRT and 85.1 Gy at reirradiation. Rectal dose-volume histograms (converted to NTD2Gy_alpha/beta = 3 Gy) and the corresponding normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) values for gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were evaluated for 2 groups: High GI toxicity (grade ≥3) and low GI toxicity (grade ≤2). Results: The 5-year grade ≥3 GI toxicity-free survival rate was 57.1%. The median rectal V70Gy and maximum dose to 1 cm3 (D1ccrect) at primary EBRT were both predictive for grade ≥3 GI toxicity (9% vs 0%; P = .04 and 72.2 Gy vs 66.8 Gy; P 10% at primary RT was predictive for high GI toxicity at reirradiation (P 70 Gy and NTCP >10% calculated for a first irradiation may be associated with a higher risk of developing high GI toxicity at reirradiation with a possible D1ccrect threshold of 130 Gy.

Postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a validated treatment option in the adjuvant setting for prostate cancer patients with aggressive pathological features following radical prostatectomy (RP) or as salvage modality in patients with biochemical recurrence after RP. Contemporary randomized phase III trials have provided evidence for using hypofractionation in the definitive treatment setting as an alternative to standard fractionated regimens. Biomathematical modeling for prostate cancer fractionated EBRT associated with widely available refined treatment delivery techniques such as volumetric modulated-arc therapy with image-guided RT may improve the therapeutic ratio. Nevertheless, the role of hypofractionation in the postoperative setting still remains investigational. In this systematic review of the literature we reviewed the role of hypofractionation for postoperative EBRT in the adjuvant or salvage setting in prostate cancer patients previously treated by RP. A favorable acute toxicity profile with, at least, as good biochemical control rates with hypofractionation has been suggested. And yet conflicting results have been reported concerning long-term genitourinary late toxicity. Prospective studies are eagerly awaited to assess the role of hypofractionation in the postoperative setting.

In this retrospective study we evaluated the long-term results of 35 early-stage favourable T1-2 N0 M0 anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques combining low dose prophylactic inguinal-pelvic irradiation with dose-escalated boost. Optimal locoregional control and good tolerance makes this treatment a valuable alternative to brachytherapy boost and involved-field radiotherapy plans.

Purpose: The aims of this study were to assess the intraindividual performance of F-18-fluorocholine (FCH) and C-11-acetate (ACE) PET studies for restaging of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa), to correlate PET findings with long-term clinical and imaging follow-up, and to evaluate the impact of PET results on patient management.Methods: Thirty-three PCa patients relapsing after radical prostatectomy (n = 10, prostate-specific antigen [PSA]

Purpose Our purpose was to assess the ability of electromagnetic transponders (EMTs) to localize and track movements in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with metallic hip prostheses (MHPs) treated with curative radiation therapy (RT). Methods and Materials Data sets of 8 PCa patients with MHPs (3 bilateral and 5 unilateral) treated between 2016 and 2018 with RT and EMT tracking were retrospectively assessed. The distances between the 3 EMTs (apex to left, left to right, right to apex) and the isocenter were calculated both on planning computed tomography (CT) and cone beam CT (CBCT) at the first treatment fraction and compared with data reported by Calypso. EMT position and treatment interruptions triggered by Calypso were analyzed for all evaluable treatment fractions (n = 120). Localization accuracy was quantified by recording the geometric residual value (expected limit ≤0.2 cm) at the RT setup. Results The Calypso system was able to localize and track prostate position without any detectable interference from MHP. For every treatment fraction, the agreement between the CBCT images and Calypso guidance was optimal, with EMTs always within the defined tolerance (ie, CT-Calypso or CBCT-Calypso measured differences in inter-EMT distances within 0.3 cm). EMT to isocenter distances measured by Calypso reproduced CT data and were confirmed on CBCT scans. During RT, the EMT centroid exceeded the threshold 24 times (20% of all fractions): 5 times in the left-right, 15 times in the anteroposterior, and 4 times in the superoinferior directions. The largest motions recorded were in the anteroposterior axis: 0.6 cm anteriorly and 0.5 cm posteriorly in patients with unilateral and bilateral MHP, respectively. Conclusions Our study represents the first clinical experience assessing the localization and tracking accuracy of Calypso EMTs during curative RT of patients with PCa with unilateral or bilateral MHP.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is one of the treatment options for localized prostate cancer, with an excellent disease control rate. However, these patients can experience late disease recurrence with metastatic dissemination. Peritoneal metastases are an uncommon recurrence site. Here, we discuss 3 cases of peritoneal metastases following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and the mechanisms of peritoneal invasion. Through a literature review and our case reports, we postulate the existence of 2 distinct mechanisms of peritoneal invasion: one being iatrogenic, following a laparoscopic surgery with a well differentiated prostate cancer at a nonadvanced stage of the disease, the other involving the natural course of poor-prognosis tumors, even without surgery.

Hodgkin lymphoma is a haematological malignancy predominantly affecting young adults. Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly curable disease by current treatment standards. Latest treatment guidelines for Hodgkin lymphoma however imply access to diagnostic and treatment modalities that may not be available in settings with restricted healthcare resources. Considerable discrepancies in Hodgkin lymphoma patient survival exist, with poorer outcomes reported in resources-constrained settings. Resources-stratified guidelines for diagnosis, staging and treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma were derived in an effort to optimize patient outcome provided a given setting of available resources. These guidelines were derived based on the framework of the Breast Health Global Initiative stratifying resource levels in basic, core, advanced and maximal categories.

PURPOSE To evaluate the planning feasibility of dose-escalated total marrow irradiation (TMI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the active bone marrow (ABM) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and to assess the impact of using planning organs at risk (OAR) volumes (PRV) accounting for breathing motion in the optimization. METHODS Five patients underwent whole-body CT and thoraco-abdominal 4DCT. A planning target volume (PTV) including all bones and ABM was contoured on each whole-body CT. PRV of selected OAR (liver, heart, kidneys, lungs, spleen, stomach) were determined with 4DCT. Planning consisted of 9-10 full 6 MV photon VMAT arcs. Four plans were created for each patient with 12 Gy prescribed to the PTV, with or without an additional 4 Gy SIB to the ABM. Planning dose constraints were set on the OAR or on the PRV. Planning objective was a PTV Dmean

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a whole-body 18F-choline (FCH) hybrid PET/MRI for prostate cancer patients at biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP) compared to pelvic multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), one of the standard imaging modality for this patient population. From 2010 to 2016, 58 whole-body FCH PET/MRI studies with mpMRI acquisitions were performed in 53 prostate cancer patients relapsing after curative RP. Median PSA and PSA doubling time (PSA DT) at PET study were 1.5 ng/ml and 6.5 months, respectively. The overall positivity rate of FCH PET/MRI was 58.6% (n = 34), dropping to 44% in patients with a PSA ≤ 2 ng/ml (n = 36). Median PSA values in positive and negative PET/MRI studies were 2.2 ng/ml and 0.8 ng/ml, respectively, with no differences in PSA DT (6.5 vs. 6.6 months). A PSA value ≥ 1.5 ng/ml was a significant predictor of positivity on PET/MRI studies. Compared to PET, mpMRI identified more local relapses (17 vs. 14, p = 0.453) while PET outperformed whole-body Dixon MRI for regional (16 vs. 9, p = 0.016) and distant (12 vs. 6, p = 0.031) metastases. Compared to pelvic mpMRI, the treatment approach turned out to be influenced more frequently using whole-body FCH hybrid PET/MRI studies (58.6% vs. 38%). In prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after RP, whole-body FCH PET/MRI achieved a higher detection rate of nodal/distant metastases compared to pelvic mpMRI alone, increasing the change of treatment strategy by more than 20%.

The ONE SHOT trial is the first phase I/II prospective, multicenter, single-arm study assessing the efficacy and safety of a single-dose SBRT for men with localized prostate cancer. Aim of this paper is to present the phase I results of a 19 Gy single fraction urethra-sparing SBRT with real-time electromagnetic tracking.

Installation and use of a new radiotherapy device require an adequate quality and safety policy. The process leading to the commissioning of an accelerator following the construction of a bunker includes, among other tasks, the installation of the accelerator, the verification of compliance with the specifications, the signature of the acceptance specification as well as the process of characterization and modeling of the accelerator before its clinical use. The emergence of modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity modulated conformational radiotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy, has resulted in more complex quality controls. The purpose of this article is to explain the different stages of the implementation of innovative radiotherapy techniques and to specify their features.

Background Magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound was suggested for the induction of deep localized hyperthermia adjuvant to radiation- or chemotherapy. In this study we are aiming to validate an experimental model for the induction of uniform temperature elevation in osteolytic bone tumours, using the natural acoustic window provided by the cortical breakthrough. Materials and methods Experiments were conducted on ex vivo lamb shank by mimicking osteolytic bone tumours. The cortical breakthrough was exploited to induce hyperthermia inside the medullar cavity by delivering acoustic energy from a phased array HIFU transducer. MR thermometry data was acquired intra-operatory using the proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) method. Active temperature control was achieved via a closed-loop predictive controller set at 6 °C above the baseline. Several beam geometries with respect to the cortical breakthrough were investigated. Numerical simulations were used to further explain the observed phenomena. Thermal safety of bone heating was assessed by cross-correlating MR thermometry data with the measurements from a fluoroptic temperature sensor inserted in the cortical bone. Results Numerical simulations and MR thermometry confirmed the feasibility of spatio-temporal uniform hyperthermia (± 0.5 °C) inside the medullar cavity using a fixed focal point sonication. This result was obtained by the combination of several factors: an optimal positioning of the focal spot in the plane of the cortical breakthrough, the direct absorption of the HIFU beam at the focal spot, the “acoustic oven effect” yielded by the beam interaction with the bone, and a predictive temperature controller. The fluoroptical sensor data revealed no heating risks for the bone and adjacent tissues and were in good agreement with the PRFS thermometry from measurable voxels adjacent to the periosteum. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the feasibility of MR-guided focused ultrasound hyperthermia inside the medullar cavity of bones affected by osteolytic tumours. Our results are considered a promising step for combining adjuvant mild hyperthermia to external beam radiation therapy for sustained pain relief in patients with symptomatic bone metastases.

Head and neck squamous-cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) have a significant lymph node tropism. This varies considerably depending on the primary tumor site and the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status of the disease. The best therapeutic option, between up-front lymph node dissection and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) +/- followed by lymph node dissection in case of persistent lymphadenopathy or regional relapse, remains unclear. The purpose of this review is to discuss the pros and cons related to the different approaches of the neck management in HNSCC. A narrative review of the management of the cervical lymph nodes was undertaken. Searches of PubMed database were performed using the terms 'neck management' OR 'cervical lymphadenopathies' AND 'head and neck neoplasms'. Recent advances in imaging, pathological analysis, surgery and radiotherapy let to personalize the type of lymph node dissection and, the volumes of radiation therapy. Excluding inoperable patients and unresectable diseases, N3 lymphadenopathies, as well as bulky N2 stages, specifically HPV- or necrotic nodes, would be in favor of an up-front surgical approach, while HPV+ diseases, and lymphadenopathies of unknown primary would support CRT first. However, efficacy of such strategies is challenged by a significant morbidity in the medium and long terms. In the absence of higher level of evidence, the decision-making tools for the neck dissection before or after the CRT are based on the Mehanna's trial and retrospective studies with significant biases. Consequently, the approaches and the ensuing outcomes remain not homogenous depending on the centers' experience, in the context of limited data, especially for N2-3 HPV- HNSCC.

Purpose To evaluate the safety, feasibility, side-effect profile, and proof of concept of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with or without a brachytherapy (BT) boost for salvage of exclusive local failure after primary EBRT for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials Fourteen patients with presumed exclusive local recurrence after primary EBRT with or without BT were considered eligible for reirradiation. The median normalized total dose in 2-Gy fractions (NTD 2Gy , α/β ratio = 1.5 Gy) was 74 Gy (range, 66-98.4 Gy) at first irradiation. Median time between the first irradiation and the reirradiation was 6.1 years (range, 4.7-10.2 years). Results Between 2003 and 2008 salvage treatment was delivered with a median NTD 2Gy of 85.1 Gy (range, 70-93.4) to the prostate with EBRT with (n=10) or without (n=4) BT. Androgen deprivation was given to 12 patients (median time of 12 months). No grade ≥3 toxicity was observed during and within 6 weeks after RT. After a median follow-up of 94 months (range, 48-172 months) after salvage RT, 5-year grade ≥3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity-free survival figures were 77.9% ± 11.3% and 57.1% ± 13.2%, respectively. Four patients presented with combined grade 4 genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicity. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free, local relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survival rates were 35.7% ± 12.8%, 50.0% ± 13.4%, 85.7% ± 9.4%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusion Salvage whole-gland reirradiation for patients with a suspicion of exclusive local recurrence after initial RT may be associated with a high rate of severe radiation-induced side effects and poor long-term biochemical and local control.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided attenuation correction (AC) of positron emission tomography (PET) data and/or radiation therapy (RT) treatment planning is challenged by the lack of a direct link between MRI voxel intensities and electron density. Therefore, even if this is not a trivial task, a pseudo-computed tomography (CT) image must be predicted from MRI alone. In this work, we propose a two-step (segmentation and fusion) atlas-based algorithm focusing on bone tissue identification to create a pseudo-CT image from conventional MRI sequences and evaluate its performance against the conventional MRI segmentation technique and a recently proposed multi-atlas approach. The clinical studies consisted of pelvic CT, PET and MRI scans of 12 patients with loco-regionally advanced rectal disease. In the first step, bone segmentation of the target image is optimized through local weighted atlas voting. The obtained bone map is then used to assess the quality of deformed atlases to perform voxel-wise weighted atlas fusion. To evaluate the performance of the method, a leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) scheme was devised to find optimal parameters for the model. Geometric evaluation of the produced pseudo-CT images and quantitative analysis of the accuracy of PET AC were performed. Moreover, a dosimetric evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy photon treatment plans calculated using the different pseudo-CT images was carried out and compared to those produced using CT images serving as references. The pseudo-CT images produced using the proposed method exhibit bone identification accuracy of 0.89 based on the Dice similarity metric compared to 0.75 achieved by the other atlas-based method. The superior bone extraction resulted in a mean standard uptake value bias of -1.5 +/- 5.0% (mean +/- SD) in bony structures compared to -19.9 +/- 11.8% and -8.1 +/- 8.2% achieved by MRI segmentation-based (water-only) and atlas-guided AC. Dosimetric evaluation using dose volume histograms and the average difference between minimum/maximum absorbed doses revealed a mean error of less than 1% for the both target volumes and organs at risk. Two-dimensional (2D) gamma analysis of the isocenter dose distributions at 1%/1 mm criterion revealed pass rates of 91.40 +/- 7.56%, 96.00 +/- 4.11% and 97.67 +/- 3.6% for MRI segmentation, atlas-guided and the proposed methods, respectively. The proposed method generates accurate pseudo-CT images from conventional Dixon MRI sequences with improved bone extraction accuracy. The approach is promising for potential use in PET AC and MRI-only or hybrid PET/MRI-guided RT treatment planning.

This study evaluates edited/reviewed automatically-segmented structures of the breast target in patients planned in prone position and their dose/volume effects. Contouring times were reduced using automatic-segmentation. Similarity-indexes and pendulousness showed that targets with Dice values over 0.965 and high pendulousness, presented the best dosimetric results.

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is considered a standard treatment option for patients with aggressive localized and locally-advanced prostate cancer. Randomized phase III trials have provided evidence for combining EBRT to short-term ADT for intermediate-risk disease and to long-term ADT for patients harboring high-risk tumors. Even if several improvements and developments have been made in the last years in terms of radiotherapy delivery techniques, image-guided radiotherapy, and better sparing of the organs at risk the current use of ADT remains still linked to a therapeutic algorithm based on the prostate cancer risk classification as proposed by clinical trials. Emerging literature has recently shown that the biochemical response to a course of neoadjuvant ADT before EBRT, called the "prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir" (lowest value after treatment), may influence the long-term biochemical tumor-control outcomes of prostate cancer patients. An individualized approach adapting the duration of hormonal treatment according to the PSA response during the neoadjuvant phase, as well using new generation hormonal agents, may represent a new therapeutic strategy and a future way to improve the therapeutic ratio for prostate cancer patients. In this systematic review of the literature we explored the prognostic value of the PSA response to the neoadjuvant ADT phase and the rationale to adjust the use of ADT and EBRT in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer based on the biochemical response to the neoadjuvant androgen ablation phase.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) are being investigated as metastasis-directed treatments in oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PC); however, comparative data are still lacking. Objective: To compare outcome and toxicity between both treatments. Primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival, adjusted for selected variables (aMFS). Design, setting, and participants: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective analysis of 506 (SBRT: 309, ENRT: 197) patients with hormone-sensitive nodal oligorecurrent PC (five or fewer lymph nodes (LNs; N1/M1a), treated between 2004 and 2017. Median follow-up was 36 mo (interquartile range 23-56). Intervention: SBRT was defined as a minimum of 5 Gy per fraction to each lesion with a maximum of 10 fractions. ENRT was defined as a minimum dose of 45 Gy in up to 25 fractions to the elective nodes, with or without a simultaneous boost to the suspicious node(s). The choice of radiotherapy (RT) was at the discretion of the treating physician, with treatments being unbalanced over the centers. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: In total, 506 patients from 15 different treatment centers were included. Primary treatment was radical prostatectomy, RT, or their combination. Nodal recurrences were detected by positron emission tomography/computer tomography (97%) or conventional imaging (3%). Descriptive statistics was used to summarize patient characteristics. Results and limitations: ENRT was associated with fewer nodal recurrences compared with SBRT (p

Introduction To prevent radiation pneumonitis following total body irradiation (TBI) clinicians usually use lung shield blocks. The correct position of these shields relative to the patient's lungs is usually verified via mega-voltage imaging and computed radiographic (CR) films. In order to improve this time-consuming procedure, we developed in our department a dedicated, movable, real-time imaging system for image-guided TBI. Material & Methods The system consists of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) mounted on a dedicated support whose motion along a rail can be controlled from the linac console outside the bunker room. Images are acquired online using a stand-alone console. To test the system efficacy we retrospectively analyzed data of lung blocks positioning from two groups of 10 patients imaged with EPID or CR-films, respectively. Results The median number of portal images per fraction was 2 (range 1-5) and 1 (range 1-2) for the EPID and the CR-film system, respectively. The minimum time required for an EPID image acquisition, without interpretation and no need of patient position correction in the bunker, was 20 seconds against 214 seconds for the CR-film. Lung shielding positioning in the right-left and superior-inferior directions was improved using the EPID system (p Conclusions Compared to CR-films, our movable real-time imaging EPID system is a simple technical solution able to reduce the minimum imaging time for lung shielding by a factor of 10. With the increased possibility to acquire more images as compared to CR-film system the EPID system has the potential to improve patient alignment, as well as patient's comfort and overall setup time.

Purpose: To measure the impact of contouring on worktime in the adjuvant radiation treatment of breast cancer, and to identify factors that might affect the measurements. Material and methods: The dates and times of contouring clinical target volumes and organs at risk were recorded by a senior and by two junior radiation oncologists. Outcome measurements were contour times and the time from start to approval. The factors evaluated were patient age, type of surgery, radiation targets and setup, operator, planning station, part of the day and day of the week on which the contouring started. The Welch test was used to comparatively assess the measurements. Results: Two hundred and three cases were included in the analysis. The mean contour time per patient was 34 minutes for a mean of 4.72 structures, with a mean of 7.1 minutes per structure. The clinical target volume and organs at risk times did not differ significantly. The mean time from start to approval per patient was 29.4 hours. Factors significantly associated with longer contour times were breast-conserving surgery (P = 0.026), prone setup (P = 0.002), junior operator (P < 0.0001), Pinnacle planning station (P = 0.026), contouring start in the morning (P = 0.001), and contouring start by the end of the week (P < 0.0001). Factors significantly associated with time from start to approval were age (P = 0.038), junior operator (P < 0.0001), planning station (P = 0.016), and contouring start by the end of the week (P = 0.004). Conclusion: Contouring is a time-consuming process. Each delineated structure influences worktime, and many factors may be targeted for optimization of the workflow. These preliminary data will serve as basis for future prospective studies to determine how to establish a cost-effective solution.

Although encouraging results in terms of disease control and acute toxicities have been reported with extreme hypofractionation in different prostate SBRT series, the possible impact on health-related quality of life (QoL) of SBRT treatments represents one of the highest research questions and constitutes a central consideration for treatment decision.

Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment alternative for patients with localized prostate cancer. Promising results in terms of disease control and toxicity have been reported with 4 to 5 SBRT fractions. However, question of how far can the number of fractions with SBRT be reduced is a challenging research matter. As already explored by some authors in the context of brachytherapy, monotherapy appears to be feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile and a promising outcome. The aim of this multicenter phase I/II prospective trialis to demonstrate early evidence of safety and efficacy of a single-fraction SBRT approach for the treatment of localized disease. Methods Patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer without significant tumor in the transitional zone will be treated with a single SBRT fraction of 19 Gy to the whole prostate gland with urethra-sparing (17 Gy). Intrafractional motion will be monitored with intraprostatic electromagnetic transponders. The primary endpoint of the phase I part of the study will be safety as assessed by CTCAE 4.03 grading scale, while biochemical relapse-free survival will be the endpoint for the phase II. The secondary endpoints include acute and late toxicity, quality of life, progression-free survival, and prostate-cancer specific survival. Discussion This is the first multicenter phase I/II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of a single-dose SBRT treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer. If positive, results of ONE SHOT may help to design subsequent phase III trials exploring the role of SBRT monotherapy in the exclusive radiotherapy treatment of localized disease. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03294889; Registered 27 September 2017.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment alternative for patients with localized prostate cancer. Promising results in terms of disease control and toxicity have been reported with 4 to 5 SBRT fractions. However, question of how far can the number of fractions with SBRT be reduced is a challenging research matter. As already explored by some authors in the context of brachytherapy, monotherapy appears to be feasible with an acceptable toxicity profile and a promising outcome. The aim of this multicenter phase I/II prospective trialis to demonstrate early evidence of safety and efficacy of a single-fraction SBRT approach for the treatment of localized disease. Patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer without significant tumor in the transitional zone will be treated with a single SBRT fraction of 19 Gy to the whole prostate gland with urethra-sparing (17 Gy). Intrafractional motion will be monitored with intraprostatic electromagnetic transponders. The primary endpoint of the phase I part of the study will be safety as assessed by CTCAE 4.03 grading scale, while biochemical relapse-free survival will be the endpoint for the phase II. The secondary endpoints include acute and late toxicity, quality of life, progression-free survival, and prostate-cancer specific survival. This is the first multicenter phase I/II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of a single-dose SBRT treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer. If positive, results of ONE SHOT may help to design subsequent phase III trials exploring the role of SBRT monotherapy in the exclusive radiotherapy treatment of localized disease. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03294889 ; Registered 27 September 2017.

International audience; The best curative option for locally advanced (stages II-III) squamous-cell carcinomas of the anal canal (SCCAC) is concurrent chemo-radiotherapy delivering 36-45 Gy to the prophylactic planning target volume with an additional boost of 14-20 Gy to the gross tumor volume with or without a gap-period between these two sequences. Although 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy led to suboptimal tumor coverage because of field junctions, this modality remains a standard of care. Recently, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques improved tumor coverage while decreasing doses delivered to organs at risk. Sparing healthy tissues results in fewer severe acute toxicities. Consequently, IMRT could potentially avoid a gap-period that may increase the risk of local failure. Furthermore, these modalities reduce severe late toxicities of the gastrointestinal tract as well as better functional conservation of anorectal sphincter. This report aims to critically review contemporary trends in the management of locally advanced SCCAC using IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy.