Search

Mexico currently has no governmental consensus to willingly renounce the enormous drug profits flowing into the country from sales in the United States as harmful to Mexican national interests. Any U.S. drug control strategy must accept this fact at the outset in determining the prospects for success. Competing interests within the Mexican government prevent the formation of a consensus that drug profits are harmful to Mexico. Mexican presidents have framed the solution as demand reduction in the United States, while the United States has focused on supply reduction from Mexico. A significant amount of money is involved in the drug trade, with estimates ranging from $5 billion to $40 billion annually. Over 75% of the Mexican economy relies on cash transactions, making the actual amount difficult to determine. President Felipe Calderon has proposed legislation to strengthen the Mexican government's hand in fighting money laundering, but the Mexican Congress has not passed it into law. Various barriers to better cooperation exist between Mexico and the United States. The Mexican Army shows signs of corruption and military action seems to favor the ascendancy of the Sinaloa Cartel. Any solution to the problem must take the money out of the drug trade., Civilian Research Project.

An approach to quantitatively describe the relationship between the volatile organic chemical profile associated with human emanations, as measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, and genetic composition, specifically the HLA complex, was developed. To reduce random noise in the analysis, variable selection was carried out. Subsequently, two statistical analysis methods were evaluated and used to further eliminate those elements that did not significantly contribute to the distinction of the genotypes. These methods were: analysis of variance and Stepwise Linear Discriminant Analysis (SLDA). Not surprisingly, the latter was found to be superior because it takes into account the data covariance structure. For classification of the chemical profiles, several linear and nonlinear discriminant analyses were evaluated. These results showed that Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) are preferred among the linear and nonlinear classification methods, respectively. RTI methods successfully classified individual samples into the correct genotype 90% of the time when the number of genotypes was relatively small (less than 10). The recommended approach is SLDA to select important components followed by LDA when the sample size is small and SVM when the sample size is moderate or large for classification purposes.

In the current war on terrorism, the President of the United States has specifically identified two former wartime enemies of the United States as members of an evil axis. The regimes ruling these two states (North Korea and Iraq) are the same ones that existed when the United States fought conventional wars against them. The primary research question asks, Did doctrine address at the time, or has it evolved to address, the issues of war termination which have created a 50+ year armistice in Korea and a 10+ year undeclared war against Iraq? The monograph distinguishes war termination from the broader term of conflict termination to avoid discussing certain forms of international conflict beyond the scope of military doctrine. The method of evaluation uses the war termination issues identified among the three levels of examining the causes of war proposed by Kenneth Waltz, as well as several considerations dealing with military force, surrender, and negotiation identified in previous literature.

Corps engineer battalions have acquired more responsibility to provide support across the spectrum of conflict in the areas of mobility, countermobility, survivability, and general engineering. The various organizational designs of corps engineer units limit their capability to provide support in all four areas. The central research question asks: Is the proposed echelons above division engineer battalion design a better one for active and reserve component corps engineer forces to respond in a contingency? The method of evaluation is an adaptation of the seven characteristics of the Army Transformation Force: agility, deployability, lethality, responsiveness, survivability, sustainability, and versatility. The research evaluates the engineer units deployed under the current force structure in their ability to accomplish engineer support requirements (based upon the Army Facilities Components System) for a two-division peacekeeping deployment to Africa. The study then examines the ability of a hypothetical engineer force built around a proposed multifunctional corps engineer battalion design in the same operation. It also compares the two forces in personnel, equipment, and structure using the objective tables of organization and equipment. The force built around the proposed multifunctional battalion design is superior in all seven characteristics and has pronounced advantages in agility, deployability, responsiveness, survivability, and versatility.

Corps engineer battalions have acquired more responsibility to provide support across the spectrum of conflict in the areas of mobility, countermobility, survivability, and general engineering. The various organizational designs of corps engineer units limit their capability to provide support in all four areas. The central research question asks: Is the proposed echelons above division engineer battalion design a better one for active and reserve component corps engineer forces to respond in a contingency? The method of evaluation is an adaptation of the seven characteristics of the Army Transformation Force: agility, deployability, lethality, responsiveness, survivability, sustainability, and versatility. The research evaluates the engineer units deployed under the current force structure in their ability to accomplish engineer support requirements (based upon the Army Facilities Components System) for a two-division peacekeeping deployment to Africa. The study then examines the ability of a hypothetical engineer force built around a proposed multifunctional corps engineer battalion design in the same operation. It also compares the two forces in personnel, equipment, and structure using the objective tables of organization and equipment. The force built around the proposed multifunctional battalion design is superior in all seven characteristics and has pronounced advantages in agility, deployability, responsiveness, survivability, and versatility.

In the current war on terrorism, the President of the United States has specifically identified two former wartime enemies of the United States as members of an evil axis. The regimes ruling these two states (North Korea and Iraq) are the same ones that existed when the United States fought conventional wars against them. The primary research question asks, Did doctrine address at the time, or has it evolved to address, the issues of war termination which have created a 50+ year armistice in Korea and a 10+ year undeclared war against Iraq? The monograph distinguishes war termination from the broader term of conflict termination to avoid discussing certain forms of international conflict beyond the scope of military doctrine. The method of evaluation uses the war termination issues identified among the three levels of examining the causes of war proposed by Kenneth Waltz, as well as several considerations dealing with military force, surrender, and negotiation identified in previous literature. War termination issues identified by the research methodology in the Korean War include the importance of clear guidance on war objectives between the civilian political leadership and the commander in the theater of war; the influence of domestic elections; the effect of announced negotiations on public opinion and troop morale; the importance of established diplomatic communication channels between belligerents; the difficulty of negotiating with communist officials and the loss of initiative on the battlefield that accompanied truce talks; the difference in war objectives between the United States and other members of the UN command; and the impact of ambiguous foreign policy on US decision making. War termination issues identified during Operation DESERT STORM include the inadequate advice to the civilian leadership by military commanders concerning the capability of military force to achieve war objectives; the influence of limited support in the US Senate for the war; t