1. Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry
- Author
-
Donnelly, Daniel P, Rawlins, Catherine M, DeHart, Caroline J, Fornelli, Luca, Schachner, Luis F, Lin, Ziqing, Lippens, Jennifer L, Aluri, Krishna C, Sarin, Richa, Chen, Bifan, Lantz, Carter, Jung, Wonhyeuk, Johnson, Kendall R, Koller, Antonius, Wolff, Jeremy J, Campuzano, Iain DG, Auclair, Jared R, Ivanov, Alexander R, Whitelegge, Julian P, Paša-Tolić, Ljiljana, Chamot-Rooke, Julia, Danis, Paul O, Smith, Lloyd M, Tsybin, Yury O, Loo, Joseph A, Ge, Ying, Kelleher, Neil L, and Agar, Jeffrey N
- Subjects
Biological Sciences ,Biotechnology ,Prevention ,Underpinning research ,1.1 Normal biological development and functioning ,Generic health relevance ,Benchmarking ,Mass Spectrometry ,Protein Denaturation ,Protein Processing ,Post-Translational ,Proteins ,Proteomics ,Technology ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Developmental Biology ,Biological sciences - Abstract
One gene can give rise to many functionally distinct proteoforms, each of which has a characteristic molecular mass. Top-down mass spectrometry enables the analysis of intact proteins and proteoforms. Here members of the Consortium for Top-Down Proteomics provide a decision tree that guides researchers to robust protocols for mass analysis of intact proteins (antibodies, membrane proteins and others) from mixtures of varying complexity. We also present cross-platform analytical benchmarks using a protein standard sample, to allow users to gauge their proficiency.
- Published
- 2019