Search

Purpose Crizotinib has been one of the standard treatment options for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on higher progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates in phase III clinical trials. However, real-world data about the long-term efficacy and toxicity of crizotinib is limited. Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, treated with crizotinib between March 2014 and December 2016, was performed. The main outcomes measured were PFS, overall survival (OS), and adverse effects. Results One hundred and eighty-eight patients treated with crizotinib during this period were included in this study. The median age was 50 years (range: 24–74) with a majority being males (73.2%) and 80.3% with a performance status of 0 to 1. The median duration of follow-up was 49.4 months (range: 3.4–86.3%). The median PFS of crizotinib was 17.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.0–21.6) and 12.8 months (95% CI, 8.1–17.6) when used in first line or subsequent lines, respectively. The median OS was 38.3 months (95% CI, 28.4–48.2). The patients who received crizotinib in the first line had a median OS of 45.5 months (95% CI, 29.6–61.4) as compared with 29.7 months (95% CI, 22.2–37.2) for those who received in subsequent line (hazard ratio, 0.6, 95% CI, 0.4–0.9, p=0.022). The most common all grade toxicities include transaminitis, anemia, fatigue, and corrected QT prolongation. Conclusion This real-world study confirms the long-term beneficial effects of crizotinib in ALK rearranged NSCLC with favorable toxicity profile like that of the registration studies, in resource constrained settings.

Purpose The objective of this study was to assess the proportion of patients developing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) after receiving chemotherapy for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, despite receiving antiemetic prophylaxis (AEP) as per the standard guidelines. Patients and Methods Between April 2019 and March 2020, all patients planned for chemotherapy were eligible for enrolment in the study. The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of complete response (CR) rates. Results Overall, 1,276 consecutive patients were screened for this study, while 738 patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included. A total of 23.2% of the whole cohort failed to achieve CR. Also, 28.2, 16.9, and 16.6% of patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), low emetogenic chemotherapy (LEC), and high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC), respectively, failed to achieve CR. The differences in failure to achieve CR was statistically significant between MEC and HEC (p < 0.001) groups. Among MEC group, there was no difference between those who received oxaliplatin (27.8%) versus nonoxaliplatin regimens (25.8%) in terms of failure rates (p = 0.613). Conclusion Approximately one-fourth of patients failed to achieve a complete response from CINV in GI cancers despite using guideline-based AEP. Patients receiving MEC had the highest failure rates suggesting a need to improve AEP in these patients.

Background There is scant data from India on efficacy and safety of palbociclib and ribociclib in routine clinical practice. Methods This retrospective, observational, single institution study included patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancers, who received palbociclib or ribociclib with any partner endocrine therapy in any line of treatment between January 2016 and June 2019. Data were analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results The study included 101 female patients with median age of 57 (IQR 48–62) years, of whom 80 (79.2%) were postmenopausal, 79 (78.2%) received palbociclib or ribociclib in second- or later-line treatment, 59 (58.4%) received fulvestrant and 41 (40.6%) received an aromatase inhibitor. In first-line treatment, at a median follow-up of 21.7 (0.5–41.9) months, median PFS and OS were 21.1 (95%CI 16.36-not estimable) months and not reached, respectively. In second- or later-line setting, at a median follow-up of 17.2 (0.5–43.7) months, median PFS and OS were 5.98 (95%CI 4.96–7.89) months and 20.2 (95%CI 14.1-not estimable) months, respectively. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were seen in 45 (45.0%) and 9 (9.0%) patients, respectively while dose reduction was required in 32 (31.7%) patients. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, first-line setting (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.25–0.97, p = 0.043) and ECOG performance status 1 (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.20–0.91, p = 0.028) were significantly associated with PFS while only ECOG PS 1 was significantly associated (HR 0.04, 95%CI 0.008–0.206, p = 0.000) with OS. Conclusion Palbociclib and ribociclib, when used in routine clinical practice in first or subsequent lines of treatment, resulted in efficacy and toxicity outcomes in concordance with those expected from pivotal trials.

e21188 Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) constitutes a heterogeneous group of poorly differentiated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since these are rare tumors, no definitive randomized trials or clinical guidelines are available for management. This is the largest single centre study of patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma between January 2013 to September 2020 at the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Cases were identified from the pathology database. Baseline demographic, treatment data and outcomes were obtained from a prospectively maintained database in the Department of Medical Oncology. Results: A total of 151 patients with PSC were diagnosed during this period. Among these, 129 patients were included for survival analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range, 18-87) with a majority of them being males (81.5%) and smokers (73%). A significant percentage of patients presented with poor performance status (PS was 2-4 in 48%). A majority of patients had T4 (73%) or N3 nodal status (44%). The clinical stage was stage I in 2%, stage II in 2.7%, stage III in 25.9%, and stage IV in 69.4%. The initial treatment modalities include surgery (10.9%), radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT, 3.9%), palliative chemotherapy (46.5%), palliative radiotherapy (7%), and best supportive care (31.8%). The median follow-up duration for the entire cohort was 32 months (95% CI 15.0 to 48.9). The median OS for the entire patient cohort was 5 months (95% CI 3.4 to 6.5). The median OS of patients who received curative surgery was 18 months (95% CI: 2.59 to 33.4) and the corresponding 1- and 5-year survival rates for patients who underwent surgery were 64% and 33% respectively. The median OS for patients who received CRT was 11 months (95% CI: 2.99 to 19). The median OS for the patients who received palliative radiotherapy alone was 4 months (95% CI: 1.91 to 6.08), for palliative chemotherapy was 8 months (95% CI: 5.24 to 10.75) and for patients who received only best supportive care was 1 month (95% CI: 0.43 to 1.57, p = 0.001). The median PFS and ORR for first, second- and third-line palliative chemotherapies were 4 months (95% CI: 2.95 to 5.04) and 15.1%, 4 months (95% CI: 0.33 to 7.67) and 13.3%, and 1 month (95% CI 0.21 to 1.78) and 0%. In a multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors included the presence of brain metastasis (p 0.018, HR, 2.47, 95% CI 1.34-4.49) and administration of palliative chemotherapy (p = 0.037, HR2.2, 95% CI 1.04-4.94). Conclusions: PSC usually presents in advanced stages and carries a poor prognosis. Effective therapeutic options are required to improve the outcomes.