1. Characteristics of paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and its influence on tuberculosis treatment outcomes in persons living with HIV
- Author
-
Gopalan Narendran, Keerthana Jyotheeswaran, Thirumaran Senguttuvan, Caian L. Vinhaes, Ramesh K. Santhanakrishnan, Tamizhselvan Manoharan, Anbhalagan Selvaraj, Padmapriyadarsini Chandrasekaran, Pradeep A. Menon, Kannabiran P. Bhavani, Devarajulu Reddy, Ravichandran Narayanan, Balaji Subramanyam, Sekhar Sathyavelu, Raja Krishnaraja, Pownraj Kalirajan, Dhanalakshmi Angamuthu, Stella Mary Susaimuthu, Ranjit R.K. Ganesan, Srikanth P. Tripathy, Soumya Swaminathan, and Bruno B. Andrade
- Subjects
HIV ,Tuberculosis ,Antiretroviral therapy ,Anti-TB treatment ,IRIS ,Paradoxical reaction ,Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
Objective: The influence of tuberculosis (TB)-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) on TB treatment outcomes and its risk factors were investigated among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and co-infected with TB. Methods: Newly diagnosed, culture-confirmed, pulmonary TB patients with HIV and enrolled in a clinical trial (NCT00933790) were retrospectively analysed for IRIS occurrence. Risk factors and TB outcomes (up to 18 months after initiation of anti-TB treatment [ATT]) were compared between people who experienced IRIS (IRIS group) and those who did not (non-IRIS group). Results: TB-IRIS occurred in 82 of 292 (28%) participants. Significant baseline risk factors predisposing to TB-IRIS occurrence in univariate analysis were: lower CD4+ T-cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, haemoglobin levels, presence of extra-pulmonary TB focus, and higher HIV viral load; the last two retained significance in the multivariate analysis. After 2 months of ATT commencement, sputum smear conversion was documented in 45 of 80 (56.2%) vs. 124 of 194 (63.9%) (p = 0.23), culture conversion was in 75 of 80 (93.7%) vs. 178 of 194 (91.7%) (p = 0.57) and the median decline in viral load (log10copies/mm3) was 2.7 in the IRIS vs. 1.1 in the non-IRIS groups (p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF