Search

The validity of the 'Portable Ergonomic Observation' method (PEO) was investigated against posture measurements based on continuous optoelectronic and video recordings made simultaneously with the observation. Work postures and actions during different frequently changing tasks were analyzed using both methods. In general, a high agreement between measured and observed data was achieved for the duration of clearly identifiable sustained postures and actions (such as repetitive movements of hands when typing), as well as for the frequency of clearly distinguishable actions (such as lifts). The agreement between observations and measurements was low for neck postures. In dynamic tasks the agreement was generally low. This was probably because of high levels of simultaneous information for the observer. No improvement in the agreement between measured and observed events could be achieved by leaving parts of the PEO categories unobserved at a time. Playback of video tapes to observe each category separately would increase the reliability of the observations but at the expense of increased time for the analysis. Keywords: working postures, observation, musculoskeletal load